Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Consanguineous Marriages in India
Consanguineous Marriages in India
Development Team
Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor
Principal Investigator
Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi
Module Id 21
Introduction
Marriage is a universal institution evolved in the course of cultural-evolution. It is a legally and
socially sanctioned union between one or more husbands and one or more wives that accords status to
their offspring and is regulated by laws, rules, customs, beliefs and attitudes that prescribe the rights
and duties of the partners. The universality of marriage within different societies and cultures is
attributed to the many basic social and personal functions for which it provides structure, such as
procreation, sexual gratification and regulation, care of children and their education and socialization,
regulation of lines of descent, division of labour between the sexes, economic production and
consumption, and satisfaction of personal needs for affection, status, and companionship.
India is a country of diversities, where variety of cultures and people co-exists. Beside bio-
ethnic variation, the people are divided into various caste groups. Even, the religious groups like
Christianity and Islam have casteism or they are treated as a caste. These castes are endogamous.
Beside castes and religious groups, Indian is also inhabited by a large number of tribal groups many of
them are in the earliest stage of development and cultural-evolution. Earliest form of cultural
institutions like matrilineality and polyandry still exist among Indian tribes (Gautam and Kshatriya
2011, Gautam, Kshatriya and Kapoor, 2007).
There are different types and form of marriages based on different criterion. For example:
group marriage, polygamy, monogamy, endogamy, exogamy, hypergamy, hypogamy, levirate
marriage, sorrorate marriage and so on. Consanguineous marriage is based on kinship.
The word consanguineous comes from the two Latin words “con” meaning shared and
“sanguis” meaning blood. Consanguinity describes a relationship between two people who share an
ancestor, or share blood. Such marriages are favoured by different populations usually bound to
traditional customs, beliefs and to keep property in united form within the family.
Reasons of consanguinity
There are several circumstances that would give a population a reason to practice consanguinity at a
large scale. Some of these reasons for practicing consanguinity include royalty, religion, rural
background, culture, casteism, poverty, isolation and small population size. Among many of Indian
tribes cross cousin marriages are considered as preferential marriage.
The specific types of consanguineous marriage that are favoured can vary quite widely between and
within different countries, with religious, ethnic, and tribal traditions playing a major role at local and
national levels. The reasons most commonly given for the popularity of consanguineous marriage can
be summarized as: a strong family tradition of consanguineous unions; the maintenance of family
structure and property, and the strengthening of family ties; financial advantages relating to dowry or
bridewealth payments; the ease of marital arrangements and a closer relationship between the wife and
her in-laws; and greater marriage stability and durability (Bittles 1994). The degree of social
compatibility, and the close involvement of the entire family in consanguineous unions, may explain
both the greater stability that has been claimed for consanguineous unions, which have lower divorce
rates, and enhanced female autonomy. Among the major populations so far studied, the highest rates of
consanguineous marriage have been associated with low socioeconomic status, illiteracy, and rural
background.
In some populations a high prevalence of marital unions between close relatives has however been
reported among land-owning families, and in traditional ruling groups and the highest socioeconomic
strata (Bittles 1994, 1995a).
There appears to be no particular rationale for the subdivision of human populations into opposing
forms of marriage preference, and even within the major religions there are quite marked differences in
attitude to close kin marriage (Bittles et al. 1999). Thus in Christianity, the Orthodox churches prohibit
consanguineous marriage, the Roman Catholic church currently requires Diocesan permission for
marriages between first cousins, and the Protestant denominations sanction marriages up to and
including first cousin unions.
A similar degree of non-uniformity exists in Hinduism. The Aryan Hindus of northern India prohibit
marriage between biological kin for approximately seven generations on the male side and five
5
In general, Muslim regulations on marriage parallel the Judaic pattern detailed in Leviticus 18: 7-18.
However, uncle-niece unions are permitted in Judaism. Yet they are forbidden by the Koran, even
though double first cousin marriages, which have the same coefficient of inbreeding (F = 0.125), are
recognized within Islam. In southern Asia, Buddhism sanctions marriage between first cousins,
whereas the Sikh religion forbids consanguineous marriage, although some minority Sikh groups
appear to exercise flexibility in the observance of this proscription.
Legislation
A similar lack of coherence exists in legislation enacted in different countries to govern permitted
types of consanguineous relationships in marriage. For example, first cousin marriages are legal in
countries such as the U.K. and Australia, but they are criminal offenses in eight of the states of the
U.S.A. and illegal in a further 31 states (Ottenheimer 1990). Yet exceptions can be incorporated into
state laws, for example, to permit uncle-niece marriage within the Jewish community of Rhode Island
(Bratt 1984).
Legislation approved and adopted at the national level may also prove to be inoperable in practice, as
exemplified by the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 which includes a ban on uncle-niece marriage
(Kapadia 1958). Yet in a study conducted between 1980 and 1989 in Bangalore and Mysore, the two
major cities of the state of Karnataka in southern India, 21.3% of Hindu marriages were uncle-niece
unions (Bittles et al. 1992). Consanguineous unions are regarded as customary for the peoples of
southern India, i.e. those living south of the Narmada River. Cross-cousin marriage was recognized in
the Hindu Marriage Act of
1955, and the legality of uncle–niece unions was subsequently confirmed in the Hindu Code Bill of
1984 (Appaji Rao et al. 2002).
Most common form of consanguineous marriage in all major societies is between first cousins, the
importance of customary influences is apparent from variations in the specific types of first-cousin
marriage contracted. While marriage to mother’s brother’s daughter is the strongly preferred form of
consanguineous union among Indian Hindus, all four types of first-cousin union, i.e. to father’s
ndia is a multi ethnic, multi-lingual country having wide diversity on the basis of region, religion,
caste, culture, custom, believes and so on. In most of the cases, there are arrange marriages. Caste
endogamy is also very common. In spite of different forms of marriages, a wide range of population in
Indian still practice consanguinity or consanguineous marriages.
As per National Family Health Survey 1992-93 (IIPS 1995) south of India has higher prevalence of
consanguineous marriages. Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka have highest prevalence (30%) of such
marriages; followed by Maharashtra (21%) and Goa (10.6%). Kerala and Uttar Pradesh have almost
similar prevalence of consanguineous marriages i.e.
7.5%. In northern India the highest prevalence of consanguineous marriages are in the state of Jammu
and Kashmir (8%) followed by Uttar Pradesh. The lowest prevalence of such marriages were reported
from the state of Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh i.e. nearly 1%. The capital of India i.e. Delhi
have 4.3% consanguineous marriages. In central India, the prevalence varies from 4.1 to 7.5%. In east
India the prevalence is 5 to 5.7%. In general, the prevalence of consanguineous marriages is low in
North-East India. The state of Arunachal Pradesh have 3.9% of such marriages, which is highest in
North-East and Mizoram have lowest (0.5%) consanguineous marriages
Table 2: Consanguineous marriages among different Indian population (After Bittle 1998).
Many different types of genetic disorders have been reported to be more common among
consanguineous progeny, for example congenital disorders (Centerwall and Centerwall 1966;
Asha Bai et al. 1981; Agarwal et al. 1991), including neural tube defects (Kulkarni et al.
1989; Jain et al. 1993) and congenital heart defects (Jain et al. 1993; Badaruddoza et al.
1994; Gnanalingham et al. 1999). Autosomal recessive hearing loss disorders (Chen et al.
1997) and visual defects such as early-onset retinal dystrophies (Rahi et al. 1995), primary
congenital glaucoma (Panicker et al. 2002) and anophthalmos (Hornby et al. 2001) also are
present at increased prevalence. The excess risk that an autosomal recessive disorder will be
expressed in the progeny of a consanguineous union is inversely proportional to the
frequency of the disease allele in the gene pool (Bittles 2001). For this reason, during the last
decade many disease genes that are rare in the general population have been identified and
their chromosomal locations mapped by studying highly inbred families with multiple
affected members.
10
Differential was significant at P < 0.0001 (Bittles et al. 2002). Most studies in India have
indicated that early postnatal mortality is higher in the progeny of consanguineous unions,
owing to the expression of deleterious recessive genes. Consanguinity-associated deaths are
largely concentrated during the first year of life (Hussain et al. 2001), and multiple deaths
have been reported in specific consanguineous families in proportion to the level of parental
genetic relatedness (Bittles et al. 1991). The mean coefficient of inbreeding for the total
population of India in the 1992–1993 National Family and Health Survey (IIPS 1995) was a
= 0.0075 (table 1). The data of Bittles and Neel (1994), where consanguinity associated
mortality to approximately 10 years of age averaged 44/1000 births at F = 0.0625, would
suggest that on a national basis consanguinity would be a contributory factor in 5.2/1000
deaths (Bittles 2002).
A recessive gene carried in a single dose in a common ancestor may remain hidden
until it comes to light for the first time in an inbred descendant. Therefore, recessive traits
will occur with increased frequency in the progeny of consanguineous mates
Conclusion
It is established that increased urbanization and the gradual shift to smaller family sizes will
impose constraints on consanguineous marriage in future generations. In this respect, a
reduced prevalence of uncle–niece marriages would appear to be especially likely because of
unacceptable age differentials between the potential partners (Radha Rama Devi et al. 1982).
It seems probable that this decline will not be uniform in effect across populations but will be
mainly observed in urbanized populations and among couples who share higher educational
standards and later ages at marriage. The specific type of consanguineous union contracted
may also prove to be an important determining factor.
11
Given the numbers of consanguineous marriages contracted in the world's most populous
country like India, and the fact that inherited disorders which currently are lethal in less
developed societies, it is essential that multidisciplinary surveys should be conducted to
estimate the extent of the problem, accompanied by the initiation of community-based
counseling programs and lifetime care under improved treatment facilities. Programs of this
nature would clearly be beneficial to human society as a whole.
12