Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 08 PDF
Chapter 08 PDF
1 Identify all of the different management functions that Rebecca fulfilled during this
busy day. [5]
The five functions identified in the textbook are all evident in Rebecca’s day:
(i) setting objectives and planning
(ii) directing and motivating staff
(iii) measuring performance against targets and taking action over
underperformance
(iv) organising resources to meet objectives
(v) coordinating activities.
2 Outline the personal qualities that you think Rebecca needed to carry out all of these
roles successfully. [6]
3 Examine the problems that this store might encounter if Rebecca was not an effective
manager. [9]
There are many possible consequences for Allstyles department store of ineffective
management. They include:
• Lack of coordination of activities, e.g. the electronic exercise bicycle being
stocked by two departments − this would waste scarce sales space.
• A lack of direction for staff, e.g. Rebecca has ensured that all managers
are prepared to deliver the store’s end-of-season sale − without this, the
organisational goals of Allstyles will not be met.
• A failure to plan for the future, e.g. it is crucial that Rebecca is able to plan
strategies for achieving the targets set by senior executives − it is also important
that she is able to ensure that senior executives set realistic goals for the store.
1 Identify the management roles that Eli seems to have demonstrated in this case. [4]
The management roles could be taken from the ten common roles identified by
Henry Mintzberg. Some of the key roles suggested by the text include:
• liaison − communicating with people outside the business, e.g. the owner of the
competing bakery
• monitor − collecting information from relevant sources, e.g. the commercial
estate agent
• disseminator − communicating with staff following the fire
• spokesperson − communicating information about the bakery to suppliers and
customers
• disturbance handler − responding to the changing situation of the business as a
result of the fire
• resource allocator − deciding how to use human resources.
2 What leadership style did Eli seem to be employing in the case? Explain your answer. [3]
3 Discuss whether this was the appropriate style of management to apply in this
situation. [8]
Appropriate Inappropriate
• In a crisis, decisions need to be taken • Involving workers in discussion
quickly. Consultation and discussion may lead to better decision
would slow down decision making. Eli making. Workers may have had
needed to get some production up and useful ideas to contribute on how
running immediately. to tackle the crisis. The adage that
• Eli, although being autocratic, took ‘two heads are better than one’
complete control of the situation applies.
and showed strong leadership to his • The sales manager may feel
employees at this difficult time. His style undermined by Eli’s decision to
may reassure workers that the crisis will contact customers. He might feel
be overcome. that Eli does not trust him/her,
• With such a serious problem, a laissez- thus causing demotivation.
faire approach may send the wrong
message to employees.
In this case, the judgement may be that the exceptional circumstances of a fire
destroying the bakery justifies a more autocratic style of management. There is no
Top tip
Students often argue that a democratic style of
management is the best approach in the modern
business world. This may be true in some circum-
stances, but not in all circumstances. Sometimes an
autocratic style may be appropriate, e.g. during a
crisis when a leader needs to show leadership.
1 How would you classify Kevin’s style of leadership according to McGregor – Theory X
or Y? Explain your answer. [4]
2 Outline three ways in which methods of working and, with them, the expectations of steel
workers may have changed in the 25 years since Kevin started working at the plant. [6]
3 Discuss whether the leadership style used by Kevin is the best one to use in the
circumstances described. [10]
Appropriate Inappropriate
• Kevin does not have the skills/ • The workers that Kevin is responsible
personality to take a Theory Y for are multi-skilled and educated. They
approach. are capable of making decisions and
• Kevin’s style may ensure that do not need close supervision. Kevin is
operations are carried out in a not making the most of the skills these
consistent manner due to clear workers possess.
instructions being given.
(Continued)
There is no evidence that the employees fit the Theory X assumptions about worker
behaviour and attitudes. These are workers who wish to take responsibility and would
benefit from a more participative style of management. Kevin’s approach may result in
workers gradually fulfilling his expectations of them and they will cease to contribute in
any meaningful way to the business.
1 Outline possible reasons why the members of Zeke’s workgroup were so keen to follow
his lead and take his advice rather than that of Akiko and Keira. [6]
Essay
1 a Outline the main styles of leadership. [8]
Autocratic:
• Leader takes an authoritarian approach.
• Decisions are not discussed with workers.
• Leader instructs workers what to do and closely controls work.
• Workers are made to accept the decision.
Democratic:
• Workers play a full part in decision making.
• Leader consults workers and discusses decisions.
• Organisations, such as the John Lewis Partnership, describe their employees as
associates, emphasising their integrated role within the business.
• Decision making may be slower due to the amount of discussion that takes place.
Paternalistic:
• Leader aims to do what is in the best interests of their workers.
• Similar to autocratic, as the leader takes decisions alone.
• More consultative approach, as leader will listen to workers before taking
decisions.
• Decisions take into account the needs of workers as well as of the business.
• Leader tries to persuade the workers to accept the decision rather than simply
enforcing the decision.
Laissez-faire:
• This approach allows workers to get on with the job within very broad limits.
• This may be seen as an extreme form of democratic leadership, as workers are
able to take decisions for themselves.
• There is little management input into the work done by employees.
Autocratic:
• This approach may be useful in a crisis situation where decisions need to be
taken quickly. In a crisis there is no time to discuss issues with workers; leaders
may need to act quickly to minimise the damage to the business.
• This approach is typically used in armed forces and the police – there is a need
for swift decision making.
• This approach may be appropriate if workers are lazy and unwilling to take
responsibility.
• This approach may be appropriate in a recession as an autocratic leader will
make quick decisions.
• This approach is likely to cause problems, as it leaves workers feeling
demotivated and unimportant.
• A problem with autocratic leaders is that they become bottlenecks because
people learn that the best survival skill is to ask the manager first before making
a decision. People learn to wait for instructions or become terrified about
making the wrong decision. Creativity is discouraged, and the most talented
people eventually leave.
Democratic:
• This approach may be more effective at motivating workers, as they will
feel valued by the organisation. Motivational theorists, such as Maslow and
Herzberg, identify responsibility as a factor that will motivate.
• Where workers are highly trained, motivated and ambitious, a democratic style
of management may be beneficial.
• In a recession a democratic leader may be better as they will help create a more
positive environment.
• Democratic leaders typically need excellent communication skills and the
ability to generate two-way communication.
Laissez-faire:
• This approach may be beneficial where jobs are easily learned and, therefore,
workers can be left to get on with it.
• It may also be appropriate where workers are highly skilled or have technical
expertise, e.g. in research and development.
• If workers are essentially lazy, then it will not be successful as workers will avoid
work if allowed to.
Top tip
Although four styles of leadership are identified
in the Coursebook, in practice there is a spectrum
of styles from autocratic to laissez-faire. Applied
answers recognise that an individual leader often
displays a range of styles in the way they manage.
Further reading
McGregor, D., The Human Side of Enterprise, Penguin.