Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sprinting Ability As An Important Indicator of Performance in Elite Long-Distance Runners
Sprinting Ability As An Important Indicator of Performance in Elite Long-Distance Runners
Sprinting Ability As An Important Indicator of Performance in Elite Long-Distance Runners
Purpose: Increases in maximal oxygen uptake (V 02max) and running economy improve performance in long-distance runners.
Nevertheless, long-distance runners require sprinting ability to win, especially in the final phase of competitions. The authors
determined the relationships between performance and sprinting ability, as well as other abilities in elite long-distance runners.
Methods: The subjects were 12 elite long-distance runners. Mean official seasonal best times in 5000-m (5000 m-SB) and
10,000-m (10,000 m-SB) races within 1 year before or after the examination were 13:58.5 (0:18.7) and 28:37.9 (0:25.2) (mean
[SD]), respectively. The authors measured 100-rn and 400-m sprint times as the index of sprinting ability. They also measured
V 0 2max and running economy (V 02 at 300 m-min~' of running velocity). They used a single correlation analysis to assess
relationships between 5000 m-SB or 10,000 m-SB and other elements. Results: There were significant correlations between
5000 m-SB was significantly con-elated with 100-m sprint time (13.3 [0.7] s; r= .68, A*= .014), 400-m sprint time (56.6 [2.7] s;
r=. 69, ^= .013), and running economy (55.5 [3.9] m Lkg“ l-min“ l; r= .59, P=. 045). There were significant correlations
between 10,000 m-SB and 100-m sprint lime (r= .72, P= .009) and 400-m sprint time (r= .85, P< .001). However, there was no
significant correlation between 5000 m-SB or 10,000 m-SB and V 0 2max (72.0 [3.8] mL-kg^-min-1). Conclusions: The authors'
data suggest that sprinting ability is an important indicator of performance in elite long-distance runners.
Keywords: 400-m sprint time, running economy, standing broad jump, 100-m sprint time
As reviewed in a recent study,1 maximal oxygen uptake that would be important factors for performance as previously
(V 02max)2^t and lactate metabolism4-5 are related to performance reported, including V 0 2max, lactate metabolism, and RE, in elite
in long-distance runners. Running economy (RE) is another impor long-distance runners. We measured 100-m and 400-m sprint times
tant performance factor in long-distance runners.3-6-7 Therefore, it which could assess the sprinting ability in the last phase of
is important for long-distance runners to increase V 0 2max, lactate competitions, and the standing broad jump as the index of leg
metabolism, and RE in order to improve their performance. power, which is related to sprinting ability.12 We hypothesized that
On the other hand, some studies have shown that elite long sprinting ability is an important indicator of performance in elite
distance runners should also have other abilities in order to run long-distance runners.
faster and win competitions. Yamanaka et al8 demonstrated that the
5000-m seasonal best time of elite junior long-distance runners was
comelated with the cross-sectional area of the psoas major, which is Methods
directly related to sprinting ability.9 Moreover, Tucker et al10
Subjects
showed a variation in running velocity during a world-record
performance and reported that the final kilometer lap was signifi The subjects were 12 men. Some subjects were national top-level
cantly faster than the middle sections of 5000-m and 10,000-m athletes. Mean age, height, and weight were 25.2 (2.9) years, 173.4
races. In addition, de Koning et al" found an exponential increase in (5.7) cm, and 58.3 (4.1) kg, respectively. All results in this study
running velocity in the final kilometer by the winner of the Beijing were expressed as mean (SD). The official average personal best
Olympics men’s 10,000-m race. Therefore, sprinting ability seems times in 5000-m and 10,000-m races were 13:52.8 (0:21.6) (13:19—
to be an important indicator of performance for elite long-distance 14:15) and 28:31.3 (0:30.9) (27:29-29:06), respectively. The official
runners especially in the final phase of competitions. Nevertheless, average seasonal best times in 5000-m (5000 m-SB) and 10,000-m
there have been no publications reporting the relationship between (10,000 m-SB) races within 1 year before or after the examination
performance and sprinting ability in elite long-distance runners. were 13:58.5 (0:18.7) (13:28-14:24) and 28:37.9 (0:25.2) (27:44-
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships 29:10), respectively. We defined the 5000 m-SB and 10,000 m-SB
between performance and sprinting ability as well as other elements as the index of performance in the long-distance runners.
The protocol was reviewed and approved by the research ethics
committee of the Japan Institute of Sports Sciences in accordance
Yamanaka is with the Faculty of Agro-Food Sciences, Niigata Agro-Food Univer
with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent
sity, Niigata, Japan. Yamanaka, Ohnuma, Ando, Tanji, Ohya, Hagiwara, and Suzuki
are with the Dept of Sports Sciences, Japan Inst of Sports Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
was obtained from each subject prior to examination.
Ohnuma is also with the Kansai University of Social Welfare, Ako, Japan. Tanji is
also with Sports Medical Science Research Inst, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Japan. Methodology
Ohya is also with the Dept of Health Science, School of Health and Sport Sciences,
Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan. Hagiwara is also with Japan Olympic Commit Each subject performed
Sprinting Ability a n d Leg P o w e r Ability.
tee, Tokyo, Japan. Yamanaka (ryo-yamanaka@nafu.ac.jp) is corresponding author. 100-m and 400-m sprints to measure sprinting ability using a
141
142 Yam anaka et al
wireless phototube system (Brower TCi Timing Systems; HaB Japan). All results were expressed as mean (SD). Spearman
International Ltd. England, United Kingdom) on a 400-m all- correlation coefficient was used to assess a single correlation
weather running track. Each subject warmed up for 20 minutes between 5000 m-SB or 10,000 m-SB and the other variables,
and then performed two 100-m trials and one 400-m trial from a because our data were skewed. Stepwise multiple linear regression
standing start. We recorded the fastest 100-m time. analysis was used to assess the relationships between 5000 m-SB or
We also measured standing broad jumps as an index of 10,000 m-SB and 2 or more independent variables. A value of
leg power ability measured in a sandpit 2 times. We recorded P c . 05 was considered as statistically significant.
the longest jump.
Aerobic Ability. Each subject performed a step exercise test and a
graded exercise test to determine V 0 2max, RE, and lactate metab Results
olism. All exercise tests were carried out on a computer-controlled
treadmill. After a 15-minute warm-up, each subject performed the Significant correlations were identified between 5000 m-SB and
step exercise test, which consisted of 5 levels steps (270, 300, 330, 100-m sprint time (13.3 [0.7] s; r - .68, P - .014), and 400-m sprint
360, and 390 m-min-1 of running velocity) with no slope angle time (56.6 [2.7] s; r=. 69. P=.013), respectively (Figure 1). Sig
(0%). Duration time of each step and rest time between steps were nificant correlations were identified between 10,000 m-SB and
3 minutes and 1 minute, respectively. Three minutes after the end of 100-m sprint time (r = .72, P = .009), and 400-m sprint time (r = .85,
the step exercise test, each subject performed the graded exercise P < .001), respectively (Figure 2). There was a significant correla
test until they could not run al the running velocity. The running tion between 5000 m-SB and standing broad jump (2.1 [0.1] m;
velocity of the graded exercise test started at 390 m-min-1 and r = -.77, P - .004) but no significant correlation between 10,000 m-
increased 10 nt-min-1 every minute (390, 400, 410, 420, 430, 440, SB and standing broad jump (r= -.5 5 , P = .064) (Figure 3).
There was a significant correlation between 5000 m-SB and RE
450, 460 m-min-1, . . . ) with no slope angle (0%).
During the 2 exercise tests, expired 0 2 and C 0 2 were mea (55.5 [3.9] mL-kg- -min-1; r - .59, P = .045) but no significant corre
sured using a respiratory gas analyzer (AE-310S; Minato Medical lation between 10,000 m-SB and RE (r=.57, P=.055) (Figure 4).
Science, Osaka, Japan), which was calibrated prior to each test with There was no significant correlation between 5000 m-SB
or 10,000 m-SB and VCL max (72.0 [3.8] mL-kg-1-min-1)
a standard syringe and 2 precision reference gases. For analysis,
0 2 uptake (V 0 2) was determined by averaging the data over (5000 m-SB: r = - . l 1, P = ,75; 10,000 m-SB: r= .25,"p = .443).
30-second intervals. Maximal V 0 2 (V 02max) was defined as Moreover, there were no significant correlations between 5000
the highest V 0 2 value during the 2 tests. We defined V 0 2 at m-SB or 10,000 m-SB and running velocities at 2 mmol-L-1 (321
300 m-min-1 of running velocity as RE. [13] m-min-1) (5000 m-SB: r= .04, P = .914; 10,000m-SB: r = .21,
P - . 948) and 4 mmol-L-1 (352 [11] m-min-1) (5000 m-SB:
During the step exercise test, we collected blood samples from
the fingertips. The samples were analyzed using a lactate analyzer r = —.25, P = .429; 10,000 m-SB: r = ~ . 22, P = .484) of lactate
(Lactate Pro 2; Arkray, Kyoto, Japan) to measure lactate ion concen ion concentration in the blood.
tration in the blood. Blood was sampled at the end of every stage We found that 5000 m-SB significantly correlated with only
during the step exercise test. We calculated the running velocities at 2 400-m sprint time (F = 14.279, P = .004) by multiple linear regres
and 4 mmol-L-1 of lactate ion concentration in the blood from the sion analysis. The contribution and standard error of the estimate
results of analysis during the step exercise test using the least squares value were 58.8% { r - .11) and 13.1 seconds, respectively. More
method. over. 10,000 m-SB was significantly correlated with only 400-m
sprint time (P = 14.958, P=.003) by multiple linear regression
analysis. The contribution and standard error of the estimate value
were 59.9% (r= .77) and 17.5 seconds, respectively.
Statistical Analysis
The time range between the performance of long-distance
Statistical analyses were performed using statistics processing runners (5000 m-SB and 10,000 m-SB) and the examination was
software (SPSS 19.0.0 for Windows; IBM Japan Ltd, Tokyo, 3 months to 1 year.
5o °
?
o
Q o
/<p
Z
6
r = .69
P = .013
52 56 60 64
400-m sprint time (s)
Figure 1 — Relationships of 5000-m seasonal best time with 100-m and 400-m sprint times.
o 6
V
3 1740 -
cu
6
y
1720 ■
/o
1700 -
1680 -
o
o
o
o
o ' 1660 • o o
r = .72 r =.85
P = .009 R <.001
1640 -
11 12 13 14 15 48 52 56 60 64
100-m sprint time (s) 400-m sprint time (s)
Figure 2 Relationships of 10,000-m seasonal best time with 100-m and 400-m sprint times.
Figure 3 — Relationship of 5000-m seasonal best time with standing broad jump and relationship of 10,000-m seasonal best time with standing broad jump.
Figure 4 — Relationship of 5000-m seasonal best time with running economy and relationship of 10,000-m seasonal best time with running economy.
Running economy indicated oxygen uptake at 300 m-min-1 of the running velocity.
5. Farrell PA, Wilmore JH, Coyle EF, Billing JE, Costill DL. Plasma 15. Ramirez-Campillo R, Alvarez D, Henriquez-Olguin C, et al. Effect of
lactate accumulation and distance running performance. Med Sci plyometric training on endurance and explosive strength performance
Sports. 1979; 11 (4):338—344. PubMed ID: 530025 in competitive middle- and long-distance runners. J Strength Cond
6. Larsen HB. Kenyan dominance in distance running. Comp Biochem Res. 2014;28C1):97—104. PubMed ID: 23838975 doi: 10.1519/JSC.
Physiol 2003 ;136(1): 161-170. doi: 10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00227-7 0b013e3182alf44c
7. Saunders P, Pyne D, Telford R, Hawley J. Factors affecting running 16. Costill DL, Funk WJ, Pollock ML. Muscle fiber composition and
economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med. 2004;34(7):465^t85. enzyme activities of elite distance runners. Med Sci Sports. 1976;
PubMed ID: 15233599 doi:10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005 8(2):96—100. PubMed ID: 957938
8. Yamanaka R, Matsubayashi T, Saeki T, Enomoto Y, Yamazaki K, 17. Kenny WL, Hodgson JL. Variables predictive of performance in elite
Sugita M. Relationships between running performance and the middle-distance runners. Br J Sports Med. 1985; 19(4):207—209.
cross-sectional area of the psoas major, and peak oxygen uptake in doi: 10.1136/bjsm. 19.4.207
elite junior long-distance runners. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med. 18. Bubulian R, Wilcox AR, Darabos BL. Anaerobic contribution to
2016;65(3):307—313. doi: 10.7600/jspfsm.65.307 distance running performance of trained cross-country athletes. Med
9. Hoshikawa Y, Muramatsu M, Iide T, et al. Influence of the psoas Sci Sports Exerc. 1986;18(1): 107—113.
major and thigh muscularity on 100-m times in junior sprinters. Med 19. Foster C, Daniels JT, Yarbrough RA. Physiological and training
Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38( 12):2138—2143. PubMed ID: 17146321 correlates of marathon running performance. Aust J Sports Med.
doi: 10.1249/01 .mss.0000233804.48691.45 1977;9:58-61.
10. Tucker R, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. An analysis of pacing strategies 20. Hartung H, Squires WG. Physiological measures and marathon
during men’s world-record performances in track athletics. Int J running perfonnance in young and middle-aged males. J Sports
Sports Physiol Perform. 2006; 1(3):233—245. PubMed ID: 19116437 Med Phys Fitness. 1982;22(3):366-370. PubMed ID: 7162193
doi: 10.1123/ijspp. 1.3.233 21. Denadai BS, de Aguiar RA, de Lima LC, Greco CC, Caputo F.
11. de Koning JJ, Foster C, Bakkum A, et al. Regulation of pacing Explosive training and heavy weight training are effective for
strategy during athletic competition. PLoS ONE. 2011 ;6( 1):e 15863. improving running economy in endurance athletes: a systematic
PubMed ID: 21283744 doi: 10.1371/joumal.pone.0015863 review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47(3):545—554. PubMed
12. Misjuk M, Vim M. The relationships between jumping tests ID: 27497600 doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0604-z
and speed abilities among Estonian sprinters. Acta Academiae 22. MacDougall JD, Hicks AL, MacDonald JR, Mckelvie RS, Green HJ,
Olympiquae Estoniae. 2007;15:9-16. Smith KH. Muscle performance and enzymatic adaptations to sprint
13. Gibala MJ, Little JP, van Essen M, et al. Short-term sprint interval interval training. JApplPhysiol. 1998;84(6):2138-2142. PubMed ID:
versus traditional endurance training: similar initial adaptations in 9609810 doi: 10.1152/jappl. 1998.84.6.2138
human skeletal muscle and exercise performance. ./ Physiol. 2006; 23. Hayes PR, Bowen SJ, Davies EJ. The relationships between local
575(pt 3):901-911. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112094 muscular endurance and kinematic changes during a run to exhaus
14. Lum D, Tan F, Pang J, Barbosa TM. Effect of intermittent sprint tion at vV02max- J Strength Cond Res. 2004; 18(4):898—903. PubMed
and plyometric training on endurance running performance. J Sport ID: 15586950
Health Sci. 2016; 1—7. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.005