Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Easement and Nuisances
Easement and Nuisances
Easement and Nuisances
Easement
An encumbrance imposed upon an immovable for the benefit of another
immovable belonging to a different owner.
Characteristics:
1. It is a real right but will affect third persons only when duly registered;
2. It is enjoyed over another immovable, never on one’s own property;
3. It involves two neighboring estates (in case of real easements) – the
dominant and the servient estate (CIVIL CODE, Art. 613);
4. It is inseparable from the estate to which it is attached, and, therefore
cannot be alienated independently of the estate (CIVIL CODE, Art. 617);
5. It is indivisible for it is not affected by the division of the estate between
two or more persons. The mere fact that the property was subdivided does
not extinguish the easement (CIVIL CODE, Art. 618);
6. It is a right limited by the needs of the dominant owner or estate, without
possession;
7. It cannot insist in the doing of an act unless the act is accessory in relation
to a real easement; and
8. It is a limitation on the servient owner’s rights of ownership for the benefit
of the dominant owner; and therefore, it is not presumed.
Classification
1. As to recipient of Benefit:
a. Real/ Predial- imposed upon an immovable for the benefit of another
immovable belonging to a different owner
b. Personal- established for the benefit of a community, or of one or more
persons to whom the encumbered estate does not belong
b. Legal- when it is imposed by law either for public use or in the interest
of private persons
c. Mixed- when it is created partly by will or agreement and partly by law
3. As to its Exercise:
a. Continuous Easements- those the use of which are or may be,
incessant without the intervention of any act of man
Note: The easement itself exists continuously but its exercise may be
continuous or discontinuous or there may be no exercise at all.
When the court says that an easement exists, it is not creating one
(hence, there are no judicial easements); it merely declares the
existence of an easement created by law or by the parties or testator
Note: The mark or sign need not be seen but should be susceptible of
being seen.
b. Non-apparent Easements- those which show no external indication of
their existence
2. By Deed of recognition
The absence of document or proof showing origin of an easement which
cannot be acquired by prescription may be cured by a deed of recognition
by the owner of the servient estate or by final judgment
4. By Final judgment
Note: If the owner of the servient estate refuses to execute the deed of
recognition, the court may, in its judgment, declare the existence of the
easement.
5. By Title
Dominant Owner
The owner of the immovable in favor of which the easement is established
Servient Owner
The owner of the immovable whose property is subject to easement for the
benefit of the dominant owner
Reckoning Period:
a. Discontinuous easement- counted from the day the easement ceased
to be used (CIVIL CODE, Art. 631, par. 2);
b. Continuous easement- counted from the day an act adverse to the
exercise of easement took place (CIVIL CODE, Art. 631, par. 2);
Note: This mode is applicable only to easements that have been in use
and later abandoned, for one cannot discontinue using what one has never
used.
The proof of non-use must be indubitable and this is particularly true if the
easement of right of way was annotated in the Torrens Title.
The non-use must be due to the dominant owner’s voluntary abstention
and not to fortuitous event; otherwise, there is only suspension of
easement.
The running of the 10-year period will be prevented by the use of the
easement of any of the co-owners of the dominant estate
7. Bad condition- when either or both estates fall into such a condition that
the easement could not be used;
Note: This merely suspends since possibility of use revives the
easement. Resolution of the right to create the servitude;
8. Expropriation of the servient estate; and
9. Waiver or renunciation by the dominant owner.
The sale of the dominant estate does not extinguish the easement. There
must be a statement abolishing or extinguishing it. Hence, the use of the
servient estate is continued by operation of law.
Legal Easements
Easements imposed by law have for their object either public use or the interest
of private persons
Note: Art. 637 of the Civil Code has already been superseded by Article
50 of the Water Code.
Lower estates (servient estates) are obliged to receive the waters which
naturally and without the intervention of man flow from the higher estate
(dominant estate), as well as the stone or earth which they carry with
them.
Limitations:
a. The owner of the lower estate cannot construct works which will
impede this natural flow, unless he provides an alternative method of
drainage;
b. Neither can the owner of the higher estate make works which will
increase this natural flow.
Note: Water right, such as the right to use a drainage ditch for irrigation
purposes, which are appurtenant to a parcel of land, pass with conveyance
of the land, although not specifically mentioned in the conveyance
Note: Art. 638, par.1 of the Civil Code has been modified by Art. 51 of the
Water Code. It states that the banks of rivers and streams and the shores
of the seas and lakes throughout their entire length and within a zone of
three (3) meters in urban areas, twenty (20) meters in agricultural areas,
and forty (40) meters in forest areas along their margins are subject to the
easement of public use in the interest recreation, navigation, floatage,
fishing, and salvage.
E. Easement of Aqueduct
Right arising from a forced easement, by virtue of which the owner of an
estate who desires to avail himself of water for the use of said estate may
make such waters pass through the intermediate estate with the
obligation of indemnifying the owner of the same and also the owner of
the estate to which the water may filter or flow.
Requisites: (SIC2)
1. He must prove that the water is Sufficient for the intended use;
2. Indemnity must be paid;
3. Dominant owner must prove that he has the Capacity to dispose of the
water; and
4. The course is most Convenient, and least onerous to the third person.
General Rule: The least prejudice criterion and the shortest distance
criterion must concur (Calimoso v. Roullo, G.R. No. 198594, January 25,
2016).
2. The servient owner must demand for release of his estate coupled
with return of indemnity received without interest
Party Wall
Common Wall which separates 2 estates built by a common agreement at the
dividing line such that it occupies a portion of both estates on equal parts
Presumptions of Existence
1. In dividing walls of adjoining buildings, up to point of common elevation;
2. In dividing walls of gardens and yards situated in cities, towns, or in rural
communities;
3. In dividing fences, walls and live hedges rural lands;
4. In ditches or drains between two estates;
Rebuttal of Presumption:
1. By title;
2. By proof to the contrary;
3. By exterior signs to the contrary.
Exterior signs Rebutting the Existence of a Party Wall:
It is understood that there is an exterior sign, contrary to the easemnet of a
party wall;
1. Whenever in the dividing wall of buildings there is a window or opening;
2. Whenever the dividing wall is, on one side, straight and plumb on all its
facement, and on the other, it has similar conditions on the upper part, but
the lower part slants projects outward;
3. Whenever the entire wall is built within the boundaries of one of the
estates;
4. Whenever the dividing wall bears the burden of the binding beams, floor
and roof frame of one of the buildings, but not those of the others;
5. Whenever the dividing wall between courtyard, garden and tenements is
constructed in such a way that the coping sheds the water upon only one
of the estates;
6. Whenever the dividing wall, being built of masonry, has stepping stones,
which at certain intervals project from the surface on one side only, but
not on the other;
7. Whenever lands enclosed by fences or live hedges adjoin others that are
not enclosed.
8. Whenever the earth or dirt removed to open the ditch or to clean it is only
on one side thereof. The ownership of the ditch shall belong to the owner
of the land having this exterior sign in his favor.
Obligations of Part-owners:
1. To contribute proportionately to the repair and maintenance unless he
renounces his part-ownership
2. If one part-owner raises the height of the wall, he must: (MECA)
a. Bear the cost of Maintenance of the additions;
b. Bear the increased Expenses of preservation;
c. Bear the Cost of construction; and
d. Give Additional land, if necessary, to thicken the wall.
Requisites: (DINE)
1. Least possible Damage caused;
2. There must be payment of proper Indemnity;
3. There must be No adequate outlet to the rain water because the yard or
court of a house is surrounded by other houses;
4. The outlet to the water must be at the point where Egress is easiest and
establishing a conduit for drainage
b. Plantings
Rules (OC-2-50):
1. Follow distances as prescribed by Ordinances;
2. In the absence of ordinances, Customs must be observed;
3. If none, the followign rules shall be observed:
i. For large trees: at least 2m from boundary;
ii. For shrubs, at least 50cm from the center of the tree
The general public, or anybody injured by the nuisance is the dominant owner in
an easement against nuisance.
Subjacent Support
When the supported land is above and the supporting land is beneath
Note: There exists a doubt as to whether easements against nuisance and lateral
and subjacent support may be categorized as legal easements. While they are
restrictions on ownership, still even without prohibition by the dominant estate,
the elimination of such support would be unlawful.
VOLUNTARY EASEMENTS
These are easements constituted by will of the parties or of a testator.
Extinguishment
A voluntary easement could be extinguished only by mutual agreement or by
renunciation of the owner of a dominant estate. The fact that an easement by
grant may have also qualified as an easement by necessity does not detract
from its permanency as a property right, which survives the termination of the
necessity.
It is generally effective between the parties, their heirs and assigns, except in
case where the rights and obligations under the contract are not transmissible by
their nature.
When the easement in this case was established by contract, the parties
unequivocally made provisions for its observance by all whom in the future might
succeed them in dominion.
Abandonment of Property
If upon the establishment of voluntary easement, the servient owner bounds
himself to bear the cost of use and preservation, he may free himself
therefrom, by renunciation of his property. The abandonment must appear in
a public instrument for convenience only.
NUISANCES
Nuisance is so comprehensive that it has been applied to almost all ways which
have interfered with the rights of the citizens, either in person, property, the
enjoyment of his property, or his comfort.
Classes of nuisance:
As to the object it affects:
1. Public- affects the community or a considerable number of persons
2. Private- affects only a person or a small number of persons
3. Mixed- nuisance may be both public and private in character
Extrajudicial Abatement
Requisites:
1. Nuisance must be specially injurious to the person affected;
2. No breach of peace of unnecessary injury must be committed;
3. Prior demand;
4. Prior demand has been rejected;
5. Approval by district health officer and assistance of local police;
6. Value of destruction does not exceed P3,000.