Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Helen Simpson Interview: The Great Unspoken Subject For Couples Is Probably: Whose Job Is More Impo
Helen Simpson Interview: The Great Unspoken Subject For Couples Is Probably: Whose Job Is More Impo
Helen Simpson Interview: The Great Unspoken Subject For Couples Is Probably: Whose Job Is More Impo
H
alfway through our interview, Helen Simpson begins to worry
about the time. We’d frittered the first few minutes on general
civilities, and squandered several more fiddling with books
and bags and glasses of water. Now the clock is ticking, and
we’re paying for our profligacy. “We’ve only got an hour,” she
frowns. “How far in are we?” She unclasps her watch and lays it on the
table between us. “There. We’re all right. We can see how long we’ve got
left.”
Simpson brought out her first book, Four Bare Legs in a Bed, in 1990,
followed it up with a second, Dear George, five years later, and a third,
Hey Yeah Right Get a Life, five years after that. At this point, the
inadvertent pattern of her publishing began to acquire the look of a
hallmark. Her decision to carry on working to a five-year plan was pivotal,
though it probably didn’t look it at the time; only now, from the vantage
point of 15 years and three collections later, can its real impact be felt.
While the heroines in Simpson’s collections come and go, changing from
story to story, they share crucial strands of DNA. In the first place they are,
mostly, heroines: men step into the spotlight from time to time, but
generally they are there as the foil for Simpson’s astringent depictions of
contemporary female lives. In the second, they are drawn almost
invariably from the metropolitan middle classes: educated professionals
with mortgages and (of course) children. Finally – and this is the part that
gets more interesting with every passing book – their average age mirrors
Simpson’s own, edging up half a decade between collections. Four Bare
Legs’ amorous newlyweds morph into the stupefied mothers of Hey Yeah
Right Get a Life, Constitutional’s (2005) divorcees and outpatients, and,
finally, into Cockfosters’ “sandwich generation”; women who, while
“caught between teens and aged parents”, are nevertheless liberated from
the daily burden of childcare and are feeling out the edges of their
newfound freedom.
Simpson was born in Bristol in 1959. Her mother was a Londoner, forced
out of school by the war at 14; afterwards she trained as a primary school
teacher. Her father’s family were shipbuilders from the north-east; he was
apprenticed in the shipyards and ended up as a naval architect, but left in
his 40s to become a teacher, too. Simpson herself was “the first in my
family to go to university; the first from my school to go to Oxford”; her
education deposited her in precisely the professional middle-classes from
which her characters are lifted. It’s a milieu that only came into existence
in the last half century; a function of history, she believes, rather than
class. “I think I’m very typical of my times,” she says, “and the people I’m
writing about are people like me: those of my generation who, for the first
time, found they could move around, do something different from their
parents and, in the case of women, do something based on their brain.”
So typical was her biography, in fact, that she rewrote it at the first
opportunity. She stayed on at Oxford to study for a PhD, but her heart
wasn’t in it; one day, she picked up a copy of Vogue and saw they were
running a talent contest “in which you had to write your life story in 700
words. My life seemed deeply boring, so I made up a more sensational
one.” She relocated her family from the London suburbs to the wilds of
Yorkshire, gave herself a market gardener father and four paratrooper
brothers, generally amped up the drama. Pure fiction, but it won her a job;
she spent five years at Vogue, writing travel pieces and interviewing the
likes of Angela Carter, Salman Rushdie and an aged Lawrence Durrell.
“I envisage the new state as being like Arizona,” said Mae at last, opening a
new packet of needles. “Arizona?” said Liz, nonplussed. “Yes,” shruMed
Mae. “What, a desert?” “No, not that. I see it as ... arriving in another state
... brilliantly lit and level and filled with dependable sunshine.” “So that’s it,”
said Liz. “We’re about to emigrate.”
It’s a bright, benevolent vision of a future filled, not with losses, but with
possibilities; as shocking, in its way, to those of us conditioned to the
notion of female old age as dark and witchy, as Simpson’s depiction of
motherhood’s sticky intimacy was a decade and a half ago. “The fact is,”
Simpson says now, “that some people do have a wretched time, but a lot
are fine. It’s like anything else: there are enjoyable bits, too. Old age has
shifted; people expect a lot more of it now. And this has all changed in the
last decade. Children were taboo, then death was taboo, but everyone’s
done death now. Old age – the pleasures of old age – that’s the last one,
maybe.”
And with that, the hour closes; time has run out. We part in a flurry of
coats and goodbyes. Any chance we might meet again in five years’ time,
when the next instalment comes out? “Yes! I don’t see why not. I’d like to
carry on; there’s lots to say, if you’re prepared to say it. Telling the truth is
the main thing: nothing else is consoling. Even if you write something that
seems hard or grim, if it’s truthful, it consoles. You think, ‘yes: that’s how
it is’.” You do.
Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our
own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political
bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means
we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away,
and rigorously challenge those in power.