Nilkanta Report

Initial Structural Modeling, Analysis & Design Report for commercial building structure
STRUCTURAL MODELING, ANALYSIS
&
DESIGN REPORT
OF
RESIDENTAL/COMMERCIAL BUILDING
SUBMITTED BY:
1|Page
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This report comprises the summary of the commercial/ residential building of

Nilkanta Agrawal Ithari -6 Nepal. The reports consist of the design procedures
adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output.
During the design, it is assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as
well as the structural design. It is also assumed that the construction will be
supervised by professional engineer.
The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system made by
the client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the
alterations to non-structural system made such that the weight of each individual floor or
the weight of the whole building is altered by more than 10% of design weight of each
floor and the total weight.
The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the
concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be
provided to the client or concerned authorities when needed, upon request. The
building is newly designed conforming to 1994 Nepal National Building code, and
expects underlying intent of Life Safety performance under design earthquake.
…………………………
. Er.
NEC No. Civil
Civil “A” Category
2|Page
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………..4
1.0 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 5
2.0 SALIENT FEATURES ................................................................................................................. 5
3.0 Loading……………………………………………………………………………………………….7
3.1 DEAD LOADS .................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 LIVE LOADS ...................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.1 LOAD ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................... 7
3.3 EARTHQUAKE LOADS ........................................................................................................ 7
3.4 LOAD CASES AND COMBINATIONS ..................................................................................... 8
3.4.1 LOAD CASES .................................................................................................................... 8
3.4.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS........................................................................................................ 8
3.5 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ..................................................................................................... 9
3.5.1 LEVEL OF DESIGN ............................................................................................................. 9
3.5.2 METHOD OF SEISMIC ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 10
3.5.2.1 DESIGN SEISMIC FORCES ............................................................................................... 10
3.5.3 DESIGN AND DETAILING .................................................................................................. 10
4. KEY FRAME DIAGRAM ..................................................................................................... 11
5. BEAM AND COLUMN GRID PLAN....................................................................................... 12
6. Beam and Column SECTIONAL VIEW……………………………………………………..16
SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS .............................................. 18

1.0 Load Calculation .................................................................. ……………………….…19
2.0 Time period and Base Shear Calculation ..................................................................20
3.0 Joint reaction………………………………………………………………………………..21
4.0 Moment Diagram…………………………………………………………………………..22
5.0 Axial Force Diagram……………………………………………………………………….25
6.0 Design of Member………………………………………………………………………....28
6.1 Design of Beam and Column……………………………………………………………..28
6.2 Design of Floor Slab……………………………………………………………………….34
6.3 Design of Footing…………………………………………………………………………..36
6.3.1 Design of Eccentric Footing…………………………………………………………….36
6.3.2 Design of Isolated Footing……………………………………………………………...39
6.4 Design of Staircase………………………………………………………………………...41
6.5 ETAB 2015 concrete frame design(Column Section).………………………………….42
6.6 ETAB 2015 concrete frame design(Beam Section)…………………………………….44
7.0 Reinforcement Details……………………………………………………………………..45
3|Page
Part 1
INTRODUCTION
4|Page
1.0 Background
This report summarizes structural analysis and design of the Residential building
for Dharan Sub-Metropolitan City. The analysis and design has been based on
the prevailing codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building Code
of Nepal and the IS codes at places.
2.0 Salient Features

2.1 Project Information:
Owner :Nilkanta Agrawal
Building Type :Commercial/Residental
Location :Itahari -
Plot No. :
Plot Area :0-0-
2.2 Building Features:

Type of Structure :RCC Framed Structure
Storey :3Storey+ staircase cover
Storey Height :3.2m
Total Height :9.6 m
2.3 Structural Features:

Foundation type :Mat 18”
Column :Square 16”x 16” (M20)
Beam :Rectangular – 14”x 20”,10X14”14”X22” (M20)
Slabs :Two-way, 5.” (127mm)thick (M20)
Staircase : 6” thick (M20)
Wall :Non-load bearing brick wall
Structural System :RCC Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
5|Page
2.4 Site Condition:

Soil Type :III
Seismic Zone Factor :V
Safe Bearing Capacity :89 KN/m2 ( From Report)
2.5 Material Properties
Cement :Ordinary Portland Cement(OPC)

Concrete
Grade :M20,
Density :25 KN/ m3
Poisson’s ratio :0.2
Modulus of Elasticity (5000√fck) :22360.68 N/mm2 for M20
: 25000 N/mm2 for M25
Steel Grade (for reinforcement) :Fe500
2.6 Design Basis
The building is designed following the standard codes and norms. The
different codes used for the structural design are
 IS 456:2000 : Code of practice for plain and reinforced

concrete.
 NBC 105:1994 : Code of practice for Earthquake resist design of
structures.
 IS 875:1987 : Code of practice for design loads (other than
earthquake) for Building and structures.
 SP16:1980 :Design aids for reinforced concrete to IS
456:1978
 IS 13920:1993 :Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures
subjected to seismic forces.
6|Page
3. Loading
3.1 Dead Loads

Dead loads include the self weight of the structure and all other permanent loads such
as partitions, floor finish, etc, which are fixed in position and invariable with time. Dead
loads are calculated based on IS 875:1987 part 1
Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) 25 KN/m3
Brick masonry along with plaster in wall 18.85 KN/m3
Floor Finishing Rooms with plaster punning 20.4 KN/m2
3.2 Live loads
Live loads include movable or moving loads without acceleration. This includes
movable partitions, furniture, equipments, people, vehicles, stored materials, etc. Live
loads are calculated based on IS 875:1987 part II
Rooms 2,3,4KN/m2
Balcony / Stair 4 KN/m2
Roof 1.5 KN/m2
Roof (Inaccessible) 0.75 KN/m2
Toilet 2 KN/m2
3.3 Earthquake loads
Earthquake load has been calculated based on IS 1893:2000. Basically, horizontal

seismic forces shall be considered for the structures that depends on different
parameters. Different parameters for generating earthquake loads are:
Seismic Zone :V (as per classification of IS 1893)
Zone factor(Z) :0.36
Importance Factor :1.0 (for Commercial building)
Reduction Factor :5 (for SMRF)
Soil Type : loose
Height of building :9.6m
Fundamental Time Period :0.5076 seconds
Spectral Acceleration (Sa/g) :PC
Hor. Seismic Coefficient (Ah) :(Z*I/2*R) *Sa/g = PC
Seismic Weight of building (W s ) :DL+0.25(LL≤3)+DL+0.5(LL>3) = PC KN
Base Shear (Vb) : Ah * Ws = PC KN
7|Page
3.4 Load Cases and Combinations
3.4.1 Load Cases
Load cases are the independent loadings for which the structure is explicitly analyzed.
Earthquake forces occur in random fashion in all directions. For buildings, whose
lateral load resisting elements are oriented in two principal directions, it is usually
sufficient to analyze in these to principal directions (X – and Y – direction) separately
one at a time. Thus, the load cases adopted are as follows:
i. Dead Load (DL)

ii. Live Load (LL)
iii. Earthquake load in +ve X- direction
iv. Earthquake load in - ve X- direction
v. Earthquake load in +ve Y- direction
vi. Earthquake load in - ve Y- direction
3.4.2 Load Combinations
Load combinations are the loadings formed by the linear combination of the
independent loading conditions. The different load cases have been combined as per
Clause 6.3.1.2 of IS 1893:2002 Part I. The load combinations are as follows:
i. 1.5D.L
ii. 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL
iii. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQ (+X)
iv. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQ (-X)
v. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQ (+Y)
vi. 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQ (-Y)
vii. .9 DL +1.5 EQ (+X)
viii. .9 DL +1.5 EQ (-X)
ix. .9 DL +1.5 EQ (Y)
x. .9 DL +1.5 EQ (-Y)
xi. 1.5 DL +1.5 EQ (X)
xii. 1.5 DL+1.5 EQ(-X)
8|Page
xiii. 1.5 DL+1.5 EQ(Y)

xiv. 1.5 DL+1.5 EQ(-Y)
3.5 Analysis and Design

The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package ETABS 2016 V
16.2.1 based on finite element method. The software is capable of carrying out a
Three-Dimensional analysis. It can account for the rigid zones at the beam - column
junction. It has a capability to create a special joint at any grid intersection.
A Three-Dimensional Linear elastic analysis has been carried out. A model based on
Rigid Diaphragm Concept has been considered. This is done by creating a special joint
at the centre of mass of each floor level and constraining all the joints at this level by a
diaphragm constraint.
The stiffness contribution of brick walls on the structure has been ignored and the
building has been modeled as a “Bare Frame” with no infill wall panels.
The flange effect of the slab has been neglected. The beams have been modeled as
rectangular beams.
3.5.1 Level of Design
The design is considered as “Professionally Engineered Structure”.

3.5.2 Method of Seismic Analysis
The building can be classified as an regular

one. The program automatically calculates
the centre of stiffness and centre of mass of
the structure. Therefore, Torsion is
9|Page
Figure 1 Application of Seismic Force at Floor Level
automatically accounted by the program itself. So, no extra calculation is needed to find
out extra forces due to torsion.
3.5.2.1 Design Seismic Foces
The computation of horizontal forces and their distribution has been carried out as
per clause 6.4.2 as per IS 1893:2002 Part I
The horizontal seismic shear force at the base of the structure is given by:
V = Ah*Wt
The horizontal seismic force coefficient Cd is given by:
Ah =(Z*I/2*R) *sa/g
The horizontal seismic force is distributed at each level i according to the following
equation:
Fi = V Wi hi / ∑ Wi hi
3.5.3 Design and Detailing
The design of reinforced concrete structural members includes selection of material

properties (grade of steel and concrete), shape and size of cross section, factor of
safety and amount of steel required. The design of reinforced concrete members is
carried out using limit state method as per IS 456: 2000. The limit state method is the
modern and latest design methodology. This method evolved around 1970’s. Prior to
this working stress method and ultimate load methods were in use. Limit state method
is based on the concept of multiple safety factors and attempts to provide adequate
safety at the ultimate loads and adequate serviceability at service loads. Limit state
method can be termed as an extension of Working state method and ultimate load
method.
10 | P a g e
4. Key Frame Diagram
11 | P a g e
5. Beam and Column Grid Plan
Fig: Typical Roof Beam Plan(Storey 1)
12 | P a g e
6. Beam and Column Sectional View
Fig: Section 2-2 beam column
13 | P a g e
Part 2
SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS
14 | P a g e
1. Load Calculation
Static loading on the Building
As per IS 875 part I:
Dead Load Unit Wt. of Materials:
Rein. Cement Concrete= 25.00 KN/m3
Brick Masonary= 18.85 KN/m3
Finishing Work :
Cement Plaster = 20.4 KN/m3
Screeding= 20.4 KN/m3
Marble Finish Work= 26.67 KN/m3
Glass work= 25 KN/m3
Steel= 78.6 KN/m3
Wall Load per meter Bldg Ht= 3.20
Dimensions
Finishing Self Total per
S.no. Building Components Width Height Units Deduction Remarks
Load Weight load
(b) m (H) m
1 10" outer wall without opening 0.254 2.69 1.37 12.89 14.26 KN/m 0 0% opening outer wall
2 10" outer wall with opening 0.254 2.69 1.37 12.89 12.84 KN/m 10 10% opening outer wall
10" outer wall with opening 0.254 3.08 1.57 14.72 16.29 KN/m 0 0% opening
6 10" -Parapat wall 0.254 1 0.51 4.79 5.30 KN/m 0 0% opening outer wall
Dimensions
Finishing Self Total per
S.no. Building Components Width Height Units Deduction Remarks
Load Weight load
(b) m (H) m
1 5" outer wall without opening 0.125 2.69 1.37 6.34 7.72 KN/m 0 0% opening outer wall
AS per IS 875 Part II:

Live Load For Residental Building:
Live Load Intensity for Room= 2,3,4 KN/m2
Live Load Intensity forToilet= 2.00 KN/m2
Live Load Intensity for balcony, Stair & Corridors= 4.00 KN/m2
Live Load for flat roof with acess provided= 1.50 KN/m2
Live Load for flat roof with acess not provided= 0.75 KN/m2
Slab Floor Finishing Load
1 Room Finishing Load

Thicknes
Item s mm Unit Wt. Kn/m2
Screeding/ Punning 35.00 20.40 0.71
Ceiling Plaster 15.00 20.40 0.31
1.02
15 | P a g e
Floor Finish load
16 | P a g e
Live > 3 load
17 | P a g e
Live <_ 3 load
18 | P a g e
Wall load
19 | P a g e
2. Base Shear Calculation
S.n Description of items Quantity unit Remarks

1 Time peroid= 0.508 sec. In X- direction
0.508 sec. In Y- direction
2 Base Shear Calculation

Vb=Ah* W
Ah= Base coefficent
W= weight of building
Ah=(Z*I*Sa/g)2R
Zone factor(Z) 0.36 For Zone V
Importance Factor(I) 1 for commercial Bldg
Response reduction factor 5 For SMRF
Spectral Acceleration (Sa/g) 2.5 From Chart( IS 1893:2002)
Soil Type III From Soil Report
Ah=(Z*I*Sa/g)2R 0.09
Weight of building 6848.60 KN From Etabs Model
3 Base Shear (Vb) 616.37 KN
TABLE: Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2002

Load Pattern Type Direction Eccentricity User T Top Story Bottom Story Z Soil Type I R Period Used Coeff Used Weight Used Base Shear
% sec sec kN kN
EQXP Seismic X + Ecc. Y 5 0.508 Story4 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.508 0.09 6848.5961 616.3736
EQXP Seismic X - Ecc. Y 5 0.508 Story4 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.508 0.09 6848.5961 616.3736
EQYP Seismic Y + Ecc. X 5 0.508 Story4 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.508 0.09 6848.5961 616.3736
EQYP Seismic Y - Ecc. X 5 0.508 Story4 Base 0.36 III 1 5 0.508 0.09 6848.5961 616.3736
20 | P a g e
Structural Modeling, Analysis & Design Report for commercial/Residential building structure
3. Joint Reaction
21 | P a g e
4. Moment Diagram
Fig:-Sample moment 3-3 diagram
22 | P a g e
5. Axial Force Diagram
Fig:-Sample Axial Load diagram
23 | P a g e
6. Shear Force Diagram
Fig:-Sample Shear Load diagram
24 | P a g e
7. Design Of Member
7.1 Design of beams and columns

The design of beams and columns are done from the software itself. However, it is to
be notified that the limitations of the design by the software have been evaluated and the
adjustments have been made accordingly. The samples (summary) of the design through
the software based on IS456:2000 has been presented hereunder.
Output for the Reinforcement Area (Beams and Columns)
Fig: Grid 1-1
25 | P a g e
Fig: Grid 2-2
26 | P a g e
Fig: Grid C 3-3
27 | P a g e
Fig: Grid C 4-4
28 | P a g e
Strong column weak beam capacity Ratio
Fig: Grid Strong column weak beam capacity ratio>1.1
29 | P a g e
Beam reinforcement output
Fig: Story 1st
30 | P a g e
Fig: Story 2nd
31 | P a g e
Fig: Story 3rd
32 | P a g e
Fig: Story 4th
33 | P a g e
7.2 Design of floor slab

DESIGN OF SLAB
Analysis
Shorter Span (Lx) = 3.87 m Load detail low er upper exact
Longer Span (Ly) = 4.05 m dead Load= 3.175 kn / m2 now , Ly / Lx = 1 Ly / Lx = 1.1 1.04651
Ly / Lx =
Now , Ly / Lx = 1.04651 ok live load= 4 kn / m2 coff. ax ax ax ay
other= 1.5 kn / m2 edge 0.047 0.053 0.0498 0.047
Type of Panel (case No.) = 4 8.675 mid 0.035 0.04 0.0373 0.035
Suggested Span / depth (L/d) = 23 Load Calculation
Then, depth (d) = 176.087 mm Wx= 13.01 kn / m2 moment about Y axis about X axis
Shear force (Vx) = 16.7861 kn Edge -9.159684829 -9.70355528
depth Taken (d)= 112 mm (Vy) = 13.1491 kn mid 6.821041894 7.274267269
(D)= 127 mm Verification of depth d min= 59.294 mm fy= 500 n/mm2
check "dado pt >dmin" OKEY fck= 20 n/mm2
Reinforcement Design
a) Along X-Direction
End Reinforcement Mid Reinforcement

Adopt d = 112 mm Adopt d = 112 mm
No Deflection contrl finding area of steel (Ast) according to deflection control criteria
needed at end portion Hence, moment (M)= 6.82104 kn-m
moment (M)= 9.15968 kn-m Ast = 144.677 mm2
Ast = 196.638 mm2 Req. Ast = 144.677 mm2
Req. Ast = 196.638 mm2 actual L/d = 34.5536
Provided L/d= 23 * modification factor
provide the steel as = Hence needed M .F.= 1.50233 Changing steel can make safe against deflection
8 mm dia 150 mm c/c distance
then provided steel = 335.103 provide the steel as 10 mm dia 150 mm c/c distance
% of tension steel= 0.2992
Okey then provided steel = 523.599 Okey % of tension steel= 0.4675
fs= 80.1308
Date: May 2020 hence, modification factor = 2
Ok and Finished
b) Along Y-Direction
End Reinforcement Mid Reinforcement

Adopt d = 107 mm Adopt d = 107 mm
No Deflection contrl finding area of steel (Ast) according to deflection control criteria
needed at end portion Hence, moment (M)= 7.27427 kn-m
moment (M)= 7.27427 kn-m Ast = 162.451 mm2
Ast = 162.451 mm2 Req. Ast = 162.451 mm2
Req. Ast = 162.451 mm2 actual L/d = 36.1682
Provided L/d= 23 * modification factor
provide the steel as = Hence needed M .F.= 1.57253 Changing steel can make safe against deflection
10 mm dia 150 mm c/c distance
then provided steel = 523.599 provide the steel as 10 mm dia 150 mm c/c distance
% of tension steel= 0.48934
Okey then provided steel = 523.599 Okey % of tension steel= 0.4893
fs= 89.9747
hence, modification factor = 2
Ok and Finished
34 | P a g e
7.3 Design of Mat Footing
The foundation of proposed building was modeled, analyzed and designed using
commercial software CSI SAFE v.2016. The model was created with the input
parameter imported from the ETABS model of the superstructure. The load were also
input from the ETABS model
FE Model Created for Design of Foundation in SAFE v.2016
35 | P a g e
Figure: Point Loads (DEAD - LIVE) [kN, ]
36 | P a g e
Figure: Strip moment diagram in layer- A [kN-m]
37 | P a g e
Figure: Strip moment diagram in layer- B [kN-m]
Figure: Punching shear capacity ratio
38 | P a g e
Figure: Slab Strip Design - Layer A & B - Top Reinforcement Intensity (Enveloping Flexural) [mm2/m]
Figure: Slab Strip Design - Layer A & B – Bottom Reinforcement Intensity (Enveloping Flexural)
[mm2/m]
39 | P a g e
Figure: Strap beam Design - (Enveloping Flexural) [KN/m]
40 | P a g e
7.4 Stair Case Design
Data
Effective Span (l) 4.38 m
Riser (R) 150 mm
Tread (T) 250 mm
Waist Slab thickness (t) 150 mm
Clear Cover 12 mm
Effective Depth of Waist Slab (d) 138 mm
Grade of Concrete (fck) 20 MPa

Grade of Steel (fy) 500 MPa
Loading
Loads on going Loads on waist slab
Self weight of landing
Self weight of waist slab 4.37 KN/m slab 3.75 KN/m
Self weight of steps 1.88 KN/m Live Load 3.00 KN/m
Live Load 3.00 KN/m Floor Finish Load 1.50 KN/m
Floor Finish Load 1.50 KN/m Total Load 8.25 KN/m
Total Load 10.75 KN/m Factored Load 12.38 KN/m
Factored Load 16.12 KN/m
Bending Moment
Bending Moment = 39 KN-m
Reaction
to be used as UDL = 35 KN
60 KN-m
Area of Main Steel
Ast 745 sqmm
Spacing
Diameter of bar 12ø 16ø
270
Spacing across x 152 c/c c/c
Provded Main Steel: 12ø @ 125 mm c/c
Area of Distribution Steel

Ast 180 sqmm
Spacing
Diameter of bar 8ø 10ø
436
Spacing across y 279 c/c c/c
Provided Distridution Steel: 10ø @ 150 mm c/c
41 | P a g e
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C50 30 C16X16 DCon14 0 3200.4 1
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
406.4 406.4 62.5 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 415
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3 (Part 1 of 2)
Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm²
-317.1209 -136.3602 8.7236 6.3424 6.3424 3108
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3 (Part 2 of 2)
Rebar %
%
1.88
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 1 2692.4 3.4895 0 6.3424
Minor Bend(M2) 0.664623 2692.4 -55.809 0 6.3424
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3
Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
42 | P a g e
Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 39.2489 89.777 55.9045 39.2489 450.47
Minor, Vu3 74.795 89.777 55.9045 70.209 450.47
Joint Shear Check/Design
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1651.6 31.1 2651.8447 638.1593 -317.1209 1
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 1 of 2)
Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth

Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.841 406.4 6.625 12 No
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.841 406.4 4.403 12 No
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 2 of 2)

Ma
Moment (kN-m)
0
0
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design
Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B151 135 B 13X20 DCon8 203.2 6680.2 1
43 | P a g e
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
330.2 508 330.2 0 25 25
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 415
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Factored Forces and Moments
Factored Factored Factored Factored

Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-197.1002 17.193 167.7341 0
Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt
Factored Factored Positive Negative

Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-197.1002 25.6727 0 -222.7729
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu
Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required

-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -222.7729 1296 0 1296 360

Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 648 0 93 648
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
210.1353 91.7166 203.0195 79.0396 1164.77
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, T u & VU2
Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s

kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
17.193 167.7341 300.2 478 914.1
44 | P a g e
8. Reinforcement Details
Column Reinforcement
Column Type Ground floor First floor Top floor Stair cover STIRRUPS
C-1(16"X16") 4-20Ø+ 8-16Ø 4-20Ø+ 8-16Ø 4-20Ø+ 8-16Ø X 4L-8 DIA @ 4" C/C near
C-2(16"X16") 12-20Ø 12-20Ø 12-20Ø 12-20Ø joint & 6" C/C at mid
Raft Footing Reinforcement

Footing
Concrete
Footing depth from
Reinforcement (in X-direction & y-diretion) Footing
Type Ground
depth(m)
level
16mm Ø @ 4.5" spacing on Long Direction
Top
16mm Ø @ 5" spacing on Short Direction
Mat 18" 7'
16mm Ø @ 6" spacing on Long Direction
Bottom
16mm Ø @ 6" spacing on Short Direction
45 | P a g e
Annex
- Story Stiffness
Load Shear X Drift X Stiffness X Shear Y Drift Y Stiffness Y

Story
Case kN mm kN/m kN mm kN/m
Story4 EQXP 1 88.9494 1.8 49422.274 0 0.148 0

Story3 EQXP 1 393.8591 2.28 172715.246 0 0.177 0
Story2 EQXP 1 571.5093 3.217 177642.311 0 0.207 0
Story1 EQXP 1 616.3736 2.765 222938.939 0 0.168 0
Story4 EQXP 2 88.9494 1.75 50825.932 0 0.106 0
Story3 EQXP 2 393.8591 2.314 170242.533 0 0.088 0
Story2 EQXP 2 571.5093 3.274 174533.324 0 0.17 0
Story1 EQXP 2 616.3736 2.774 222187.468 0 0.148 0
Story4 EQYP 1 0 0.175 0 88.9494 2.16 41186.434
Story3 EQYP 1 0 0.34 0 393.8591 2.375 165867.935
Story2 EQYP 1 0 0.367 0 571.5093 3.277 174394.967
Story1 EQYP 1 0 0.218 0 616.3736 2.791 220812.475
Story4 EQYP 2 0 0.13 0 88.9494 2.041 43585.608
Story3 EQYP 2 0 0.101 0 393.8591 2.409 163471.421
Story2 EQYP 2 0 0.018 0 571.5093 3.329 171651.755
Story1 EQYP 2 0 0.009 0 616.3736 2.789 221000.271
- Modal Periods and Frequencies

Circular
Period Frequency Eigenvalue
Case Mode Frequency
sec cyc/sec rad²/sec²
rad/sec
Modal 1 0.494 2.025 12.7223 161.8581
Modal 2 0.479 2.089 13.1268 172.3132
Modal 3 0.428 2.338 14.6909 215.8232
Modal 4 0.175 5.706 35.8492 1285.1645
Modal 5 0.171 5.858 36.8039 1354.5294
Modal 6 0.147 6.785 42.6324 1817.5205
Modal 7 0.122 8.219 51.6428 2666.9833
Modal 8 0.116 8.594 53.9976 2915.7415
Modal 9 0.103 9.682 60.8332 3700.6728
Modal 10 0.099 10.101 63.4674 4028.1057
Modal 11 0.097 10.328 64.8904 4210.7661
Modal 12 0.087 11.501 72.2627 5221.8957
Modal 13 0.02 49.568 311.4478 96999.744
Modal 14 0.02 50.576 317.7761 100981.641
Modal 15 0.019 52.817 331.8566 110128.7742
Modal 16 0.018 54.582 342.9468 117612.535
Modal 17 0.016 60.892 382.5932 146377.5199
Modal 18 0.016 63.075 396.3139 157064.7241
Modal 19 0.014 71.348 448.2944 200967.8875
Modal 20 0.013 79.782 501.2863 251287.9765
Modal 21 0.011 87.743 551.3045 303936.6166
Modal 22 0.01 97.126 610.2608 372418.2725
Modal 23 0.008 121.423 762.9247 582054.0684
Modal 24 0.008 122.176 767.6546 589293.5911
- Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 1 of 2)

Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
sec
Modal 1 0.494 0.0067 0.7375 0 0.0067 0.7375 0
Modal 2 0.479 0.8707 0.0077 0 0.8775 0.7452 0
Modal 3 0.428 0.0009 0.1291 0 0.8784 0.8743 0
Modal 4 0.175 0.0033 0.0751 0 0.8817 0.9493 0
46 | P a g e
Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
sec
Modal 5 0.171 0.0841 0.0023 0 0.9658 0.9516 0
Modal 6 0.147 0.0006 0.0219 0 0.9664 0.9736 0
Modal 7 0.122 0.0194 0.0043 0 0.9859 0.9778 0
Modal 8 0.116 0.0042 0.0101 0 0.9901 0.988 0
Modal 9 0.103 0.0002 0.0035 0 0.9903 0.9915 0
Modal 10 0.099 0.0035 0.0057 0 0.9938 0.9972 0
Modal 11 0.097 0.006 0.0026 0 0.9998 0.9998 0
Modal 12 0.087 0.0002 0.0002 0 1 1 0
Modal 13 0.02 1.828E-06 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 14 0.02 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 15 0.019 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 16 0.018 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 17 0.016 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 18 0.016 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 19 0.014 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 20 0.013 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 21 0.011 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 22 0.01 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 23 0.008 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 24 0.008 0 0 0 1 1 0
- Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 2 of 2)
Case Mode RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ
Modal 1 0.3508 0.0015 0.1138 0.3508 0.0015 0.1138

Modal 2 0.0029 0.3362 0.0002 0.3537 0.3377 0.114
Modal 3 0.009 0.0031 0.7644 0.3627 0.3408 0.8785
Modal 4 0.4618 0.0218 0.0233 0.8246 0.3627 0.9018
Modal 5 0.0143 0.5752 0.0015 0.8388 0.9379 0.9033
Modal 6 0.1179 0.0017 0.0683 0.9567 0.9396 0.9716
Modal 7 0.0078 0.0337 1.825E-06 0.9645 0.9733 0.9716
Modal 8 0.0118 0.006 0.0056 0.9763 0.9792 0.9772
Modal 9 0.005 0.0002 0.0092 0.9814 0.9794 0.9864
Modal 10 0.0102 0.0071 0.0062 0.9916 0.9865 0.9926
Modal 11 0.0057 0.0129 0.003 0.9973 0.9994 0.9956
Modal 12 0.0027 0.0006 0.0044 1 1 1
Modal 13 0 2.697E-06 0 1 1 1
Modal 14 0 1.903E-06 0 1 1 1
Modal 15 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 16 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 17 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 18 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 19 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 20 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 21 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 22 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 23 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 24 0 0 0 1 1 1
- Modal Load Participation Ratios

Static Dynamic
Case Item Type Item
% %
Modal Acceleration UX 100 100
Modal Acceleration UY 100 100
Modal Acceleration UZ 0 0
47 | P a g e
TABLE: Story Drifts

Story Load Case/Combo Direction Drift per drift Z
m
Story4 EQXP 1 X 0.06% 0.40% 12.8016
Story3 EQXP 1 X 0.08% 0.40% 9.6012
Story2 EQXP 1 X 0.11% 0.40% 6.4008
Story1 EQXP 1 X 0.09% 0.40% 3.2004
Story4 EQYP 1 Y 0.08% 0.40% 12.8016
Story3 EQYP 1 Y 0.11% 0.40% 9.6012
Story2 EQYP 1 Y 0.15% 0.40% 6.4008
Story1 EQYP 1 Y 0.12% 0.40% 3.2004
48 | P a g e

Nilkanta Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Nilkanta Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nilkanta Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Initial Structural Modeling, Analysis & Design Report for commercial building structure

STRUCTURAL MODELING, ANALYSIS

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the commercial/ residential building of

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS .............................................. 18

2.0 Salient Features

2.2 Building Features:

2.3 Structural Features:

2.4 Site Condition:

2.5 Material Properties

Cement :Ordinary Portland Cement(OPC)

2.6 Design Basis

 IS 456:2000 : Code of practice for plain and reinforced

3.1 Dead Loads

3.2 Live loads

3.3 Earthquake loads

Earthquake load has been calculated based on IS 1893:2000. Basically, horizontal

3.4 Load Cases and Combinations

3.4.1 Load Cases

i. Dead Load (DL)

3.4.2 Load Combinations

xiii. 1.5 DL+1.5 EQ(Y)

3.5 Analysis and Design

3.5.1 Level of Design

The design is considered as “Professionally Engineered Structure”.

The building can be classified as an regular

3.5.2.1 Design Seismic Foces

3.5.3 Design and Detailing

The design of reinforced concrete structural members includes selection of material

4. Key Frame Diagram

5. Beam and Column Grid Plan

Fig: Typical Roof Beam Plan(Storey 1)

6. Beam and Column Sectional View

Fig: Section 2-2 beam column

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS

AS per IS 875 Part II:

1 Room Finishing Load

Floor Finish load

Live > 3 load

Live <_ 3 load

2. Base Shear Calculation

S.n Description of items Quantity unit Remarks

2 Base Shear Calculation

3 Base Shear (Vb) 616.37 KN

TABLE: Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2002

Fig:-Sample moment 3-3 diagram

5. Axial Force Diagram

Fig:-Sample Axial Load diagram

6. Shear Force Diagram

Fig:-Sample Shear Load diagram

7.1 Design of beams and columns

Output for the Reinforcement Area (Beams and Columns)

Fig: Grid 1-1

Fig: Grid 2-2

Fig: Grid C 3-3

Fig: Grid C 4-4

Strong column weak beam capacity Ratio

Fig: Grid Strong column weak beam capacity ratio>1.1