Secretary of DOTC vs. Mabalot

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Sec. of DOTC vs.

Mabalot, 378 SCRA 129 (2000)

FACTS:

The Sec. of DOTC issued to LTFRB Chairman MO 96-735, transferring the regional functions
of that office to DOTCCAR Regional Office, pending creation of a Regional LTFRO. Later, the
new Sec. of DOTC issued DO 97-1025, establishing the DOTCCAR Regional Office as the
Regional Office of the LTFRB to exercise regional functions of the LTFRB in the CAR subject
to the direct supervision and control of the LTFRB Central Office. Mabalot protested.

ISSUE:

W/N the MO and DO are violative of the provision of the Constitution against encroachment on
the powers of the legislative department

HELD:

SC upheld the validity of the issuance of the challenged orders.

In the absence of any patent or latent constitutional or statutory infirmity attending the issuance
of the challenged orders, Court upholds. The President, through his duly constituted political
agent and alter ego, may legally and validly decree the reorganization of the Department,
particularly the establishment of the DOTCCAR as the LTFRB Regional Office of CAR with the
concomitant transfer and performance of public functions and responsibilities appurtenant to a
regional office of the LTFRB.

There are three modes of establishing an administrative body: (1) Constitution; (2) Statute; and
(3) by authority of law. This case falls under the third category.

The DOTC Secretary, as alter ego of the President, is authorized by law to create and establish
the LTFRB-CAR Regional Office. This is anchored on the President’s “power of control” under
sec. 17, Art. VII, 1987 Constitution.

By definition, control is “the power of an officer to alter or modify or nullify or set aside what a
subordinate officer had done in the performance of his duties and to substitute the judgment of
the former for that of the latter.” It includes the authority to order the doing of an act by a
subordinate or to undo such act or to assume a power directly vested in him by law.

Under sec. 20, Bk. III, E.O. 292, the Chief Executive is granted residual powers, stating that
“unless Congress provides otherwise, the President shall exercise such other powers and
functions vested in the President which are provided for under the laws xxx”

What law then gives him the power to reorganize? It is PD 1772 which amended PD 1416.
These decrees expressly grant the President of the Philippines the continuing authority to
reorganize the national government, which includes the power to group, consolidate bureaus and
agencies, to abolish offices, to transfer functions, to create and classify functions, services and
activities and to standardize salaries and materials.

Granted that the President has the power to reorganize, was the reorganization of DOTCCAR
valid?

In this jurisdiction, reorganization is regarded as valid provided it is pursued in good faith. As a


general rule, a reorganization is carried out in good faith if it is for the purpose of economy or to
make bureaucracy more efficient. The reorganization in the instant case was decreed “in the
interest of service” and “for purposes of economy and more effective coordination of the DOTC
functions in the Cordillera Administrative Region.” It thus bear the earmarks of good faith.

You might also like