The document discusses the relationship between law and ethics, using the landmark Karen Ann Quinlan case as an example. It outlines that ethics tell people what they should do, while law provides boundaries and consequences. In the Quinlan case, the court agreed patients have a legal right to refuse treatment, and allowed Quinlan's parents to remove her ventilator against doctor objections. The ventilator was removed but Quinlan continued breathing on her own for nearly 10 more years until dying of pneumonia.
The document discusses the relationship between law and ethics, using the landmark Karen Ann Quinlan case as an example. It outlines that ethics tell people what they should do, while law provides boundaries and consequences. In the Quinlan case, the court agreed patients have a legal right to refuse treatment, and allowed Quinlan's parents to remove her ventilator against doctor objections. The ventilator was removed but Quinlan continued breathing on her own for nearly 10 more years until dying of pneumonia.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document discusses the relationship between law and ethics, using the landmark Karen Ann Quinlan case as an example. It outlines that ethics tell people what they should do, while law provides boundaries and consequences. In the Quinlan case, the court agreed patients have a legal right to refuse treatment, and allowed Quinlan's parents to remove her ventilator against doctor objections. The ventilator was removed but Quinlan continued breathing on her own for nearly 10 more years until dying of pneumonia.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
on medical ethics, which they believed prohibited taking an action
A. FUNCTIONS OF LAW that might lead to the death of the patient. The lawyers of Quinlan 1) Nature of Law family argued that what was at stake was not medical ethics but (a) Normative: obligatory on human conduct the legal rights of the individual patient to refuse medical treatment that was highly invasive and offered no chance for a cure. (b) Institutionalized The court agreed that patients have the legal right to (c) Coercive refuse medical treatment, determined that honouring such a refusal (d) General application was consistent with medical ethics, and decided that the parents of (2) Functions of Law Karen Ann Quinlan could exercise her right to refuse treatment on (a) Law as preservation of order her behalf. In order to reassure the physicians involved, however, -public order law, criminal law the court also decreed that if a hospital’s ethics committee agreed (b) Law as platform for human co-operation with the prognosis of permanent coma, the removal of the ventilator -law of contract could take place and all parties involved would have legal immunity (c) Law as medium of dispute resolution from civil or criminal prosecution. Karen Ann Quinlan’s ventilator was removed, although -law of tort she continued to breathe on her own. She survived in a coma until (d) Law as tool of domination she died ofpneumonia almost 10 years later. -counter-revolutionary offences (e) Law as mechanism for social engineering C. SOURCES OF LAW -land registration (f) Law as bulwark of morality 1. Constitution- is fundamental laws or -decriminalizing homosexual acts between principles that govern a nation, society, consenting adults (g) Law as regulation of governmental powers and corporation. -constitutional law, administrative law • The purpose is to establish basic governing (h) Law as protection of individual freedom system. -bill of rights, anti-discrimination legislation 2. Statutes- laws that govern. (i) Law as attainment of justice • Enacted by the legislative body and compile -rules of natural justice, bill of rights, social security into codes, collections of statutes and law ordinances. (3) Limits of Law 3. Administrative agencies- third source of law. (a) What law could not achieve • Bodies to manage crises, redress serious -e.g. love social problems, or oversee complex (b) What law should not interfere with: matters of governmental concern beyond -private life the expertise of legislators. • Example: National Youth Commission (NYC), B. RELATIONSHIPS OF ETHICS AND LAW Professional Regulation Commission, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, Department of Health, According to Lon Fuller an American Legal Philosopher: Department of Interior and Local Government, Department of Justice, Department of Labor and Employment Ethics tells people what they should do and embodies the ideals they should strive to attain. 4. Court Decision- interprets legal issues that are in dispute. Unethical behaviour leads to punishments that are related to how an individual is perceived, both by himself or herself and others. Types of Law and Court
Law, on the other hand, provides boundaries of actions, set by http://law.hku.hk/lawgovtsociety/nature.htm
society, beyond which a person may go only by risking external http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/372 sanctions, such as incarceration or loss of a medical license. 261/health-law/35626/Relationship-of-law-and- ethics This may explain why ethical codes usually involve generalities, while laws tend to be more specific. http://legal- dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Administrative EXAMPLE: The landmark case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Her parents requested +Agency that physicians remove the mechanical ventilator in order to let their daughter die a natural death. The doctors refused, relying primarily http://www.lawphil.net/administ/administ.html
LAWS GOVERNING NURSING | Error! No text of specified style in document. 1