Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Justice Reinvestment: A Framework For Reducing Spending On Corrections and Increasing Public Safety
Justice Reinvestment: A Framework For Reducing Spending On Corrections and Increasing Public Safety
Michael D. Thompson
Director
April 22, 2009
Justice Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
Council of State Governments
Non-profit, non-partisan membership association of state government officials
Support from the U.S. Department of Justice and private grantmakers such as The
Pew Charitable Trusts
2
Overview
4
Justice Reinvestment: Key Funders
5
Unprecedented Momentum in the States
How do we use data to cut spending and increase public safety in those areas that are
driving crime and incarceration rates?
Justice Reinvestment Strategy
9
Incarceration Rates in 4 Large States
11500
11000
10500 1834
bed
10000 shortfall
Current Capacity (9397)
9500
$500 m
9000 10 yr Costs
8500
20% 26% $180 m
Construction
8000 increase increase
$320m
7500 Operating
7000
13
Kansas
Recidivism a Key Driver
Prison Admissions
FY2006
– 65 % of admissions
New Court
Commitments 27 percent 35 %
– 27 % of prison population
Probation
36 percent – Annual cost of $53 million
Violations
65 %
Parole
Violations 29 percent
Prob./Parole,
5 percent
New Sentence 14
Kansas
Focus on Reducing Recidivism
Before & After Release
15
Kansas: Options for Policymakers
FY2008-2016 (9 years) Projected Prison Population
9500
9000
8500
8000
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
16
Kansas
Estimated Savings & Reinvestment
$80 m
5 Year Savings
Kansas
Identifying Reinvestment Opportunities
40 percent of prison
admissions come from
two counties
August 8, 2006 19
04
20
41
21
43
22
Arizona
The Problem
Maricopa County
1/2 Mile Grid Map
A single neighborhood in Phoenix is home
to 1% of the state’s total population but
6.5% of the state’s prison population
Further, in 2007 the state spent more than
$70 million to incarcerate residents from a
single Phoenix zip code (85041).
South Mountain
Population = 55,000
Prison Admissions = 12.3 per 1000 adults
Ahwatukee Foothills
Population = 50,000
Prison Admissions = 1.1 per 1000 adults
Prisoners
Admissions, 2006
Maricopa County
1/2 Mile Grid Map
North Mountain
Maricopa County
1/2 Mile Grid Map
GLENDALE
Alhambra
Camelback East
Maryvale
Encanto
Central City
Estrella
$1.1 Million
Within high expenditure
neighborhoods there are
Laveen $1.8 Million
South Mountain
numerous, smaller area,
$1.6 Million
million dollar block groups
High Density of Probationers in South Phoenix
Arizona
Performance Driven Funding Incentive
–
Baseline
FY2008 Rate x FY2009
FY2009
Revocations x Est. Averted Costs
(~$20,0000)
x 40% =
Population
2000
– 1714 x $20,000 x 40% =
$2.3m
Michigan
1. 2. 3.
32
Michigan
Violent Crime & Police Per Capita
Michigan has
the highest
violent crime
rate in the Great
Lakes region…
Michigan National
Average
Violent Index 28 % 44 %
Crime
Murder 37 % 61 %
Source: CSG Analysis of 2007 parole e and probation populations matched to Michigan State Police arrest records. 35
Note: MI UCR Estimated Arrests are using 2006 data, due to 2007 data not yet having been released by Michigan State Police.
Michigan
Unsustainable Spending on Corrections
36
Source: Data analyzed by Citizen’s Research Council.
Michigan
Impact of Policy Options
Estimated
FY2011-2015
Cumulative Savings:
$262
million
37
Texas
Prison Population Projection
170,000 Population
168
164,592
17,332
165,000 162,298
159,492 Bed
160,000 157,029 Shortfall
153,849
155,000 3,015
Operational
150,000 Capacity
15
150,834
145,000
140,000
2007 2008 2009
Source: Legislative Budget Board, June 06 and January 07, Adult and Juvenile Correctional 2010 2011 20
Population Projections 38
Expanding
Capacity of
Treatment &
Diversion
Programs
39
Texas
Impact of Policy Options
Baseline
1 7 0 ,0 0 0 Potential $377 million 1 6 8 ,1 6 6
1 6 7 ,5 0 0 in avoided prison
construction costs 1 6 4 ,5 9 2
1 6 5 ,0 0 0 1 6 2 ,2 9 8 Probation/Treatment
75% Diversions
1 6 2 ,5 0 0 $65.1 million in probable
1 5 9 ,4 9 2
net savings 08-12
1 6 0 ,0 0 0
1 5 7 ,0 2 9
1 5 7 ,5 0 0
1 5 3 ,8 4 9 1 5 5 ,6 1 6
1 5 5 ,0 0 0 Parole Scenario
1 5 3 ,8 4 9 $543 million in probable
1 5 2 ,5 0 0 savings 08-12
1 5 3 ,8 4 9
1 5 0 ,0 0 0 1 5 1 ,8 1 7
1 4 7 ,5 0 0
1 4 5 ,0 0 0
2007 2008 2009
Source: Legislative Budget Board, January 07 Scenarios Impact Analysis 2010 2011 2012 40
Texas
Estimated Savings & Reinvestment
41
Texas
Impact of Policy Options
2007 Baseline
Projection
Actual Population
$443 million in
savings from 2008-
$241 million to expand 2009
in-prison and community-
based treatment and
diversion programs
Overview
44
Overview
Michael Thompson
Council of State Governments Justice Center
100 Wall Street / 20th Floor
New York, NY 10005
t. 212-482-2320
mthompson@csg.org
www.justicecenter.csg.org
46