Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tema 16
Tema 16
1.Introduction
Case is defined by Quirk as “ a grammatical category that can express a number of different
relationships between nominal elements”.
2.Origin.
In O.E. the genitive was used much as for instance in German and Latin.
Nowadays the genitive is chiefly used as the adjunct of primary placed after the genitive
while the opposite order was frequent in O.E., as it is still in German.
Ending Genitive
Singular -s engles
-e grefe
-a handa
-n guman
- dothter
With the decay of inflexional endings which took place in Middle English, the ending “-s”
is the only one that has survived into Modern English, and this has been supplemented by a
new construction consisting of the preposition “of” followed by the uninflected form of the
noun.
But with Greek names of more than one syllable ending in “-s”, we use only the
apostrophe:
And there is a vacillation in the spellingof many other names ending in the voiced sisilant
/z/;the normal spelling is with apostrophe only,though apostrophe only,though apostrophe
plus “-s” is not rare in this case.The normal ponunciation appears to be / iz /.
But names ending in other sibilants than /z/ have regular /iz/ genitive.
Another important thing is that the genitive suffix is omitted after words in / S / or / Z /. In
the phrase “ for…..sake”:
My friends´jewels
The genitive plural of those words which may be confused with their genitive singular
forms is used very seldom indeed.
They are a very limited number.They are formed by adding apostrophe plus “-s”, that is, the
same suffix as in the genitive singular.
The number of possible relations between a genitive and its headword, regarded from the
point of view of meaning, is practically inlimited: Zandvoot distinguishes the following:
4.1.1-possessive genitive.
The central but far from the only use of the genitive is to express possession.If the
headword denotes an object, the genitive may denote the possessor.
4.1.2.Subjective genitive.
If the headword denotes action, the genitive may denote the agent.
His father´s consent
4.1.3.objective genitive.
The objective genitive is not very usual in ordinary English, which prefers the of-
construction:
But the construction in the genitiveis rather more frequent when the genitive may be
interpreted as one of possession.
4.1.4.Many other possible relations are not covered by these three terms.Among them
Quirk distinguishes:
4.1.4.2.Descriptive genitive as in :
My car is faster than John´s
At the butcher´s
a)Specifying genitive.
My mother´s picture
b)Classifying genitive.
When the noun in the genitive denotes the class or kind to which the person or thing
denoted by the headword belongs:
Sheep´s eyes
Thus,”sheep´s eyes” are not the eyes of one particular sheep, but a kind of eyes or glances.
We have said that when the genitive is used without a headword, it may be called the
independent genitive.We can find three special uses of this:
Sometimes the headword is omitted because it occurs in the immediate context, either
before or after the noun in the genitive:
Since there is a noun in the context that can be regarded as the headword of the genitive
here, it has been suggested that this type should be called “ semi-independent”.Other
grammarians such as Quirk use another term for this constructions elliptic genitive.
He is a friend of my father´s
A work of Milton´s
5.2.3.Local genitive.
I dined at my uncle´s
5.2.3.2.To indicate a shop.This association here is that of the shop seen from customer´s
point of view.
5.2.3.3.To indicate a person´s house or home.There the genitive has an association of the
host-guest relationship, not simply of locality.
She left her husband and went to his father´s
5.2.3.4.Functions.
When there are two ways of denoting a place ( St.Paul´s—St.Paul´s cathedral ),the shorter
is usually the more familiar, the longer the more formal way.
Quirk says that the main factor governing the choice of the one or the other form is the
animate or rather personal quality of the modifying noun.Nouns denoting persons, whether
proper names (John´s car) or ordinary countable nouns (the student´s car),can always take
inflected genitives.It can also be used with animals.The general rule here is that what he
calls “higher animals” are more likely to have the –s genitive than what he calls “lower
animals”.So the of-construction is chiefly used with nouns denoting lower animals and with
inanimate nouns.Nevertheless, there are numerous inanimate nouns which can often take
the –s genitive;they may be characterized as “being of special interest to human
activity”,denoting parts of the body (brain,mind) cultural activities(orchestra,play),means of
transpot(ship,radio,…) and so forth.
--names of relations: names of relations that occur without a preceding attreibutive word-
(grand) father, (grand) mother, uncle, aunt…-nearly always prefer the genitive-construction
to the one with an of-adjunct:
mother´s birthday
--classifying genitives:they are mostly inseparable from their head-words.so that there can,
as a rule. Be no question of replacing them by an adjunct.But in some cases, where the
connection between genitive and head-words is less close, an of-adjunct may occur:
A doctor´s degree
A lady´s maid
an hour´s work
--post-genitive:we have already see the distinction in meaning between the post-genitive an
the of-adjunct in sime examples given above:
a portrait of my father´s
a portrait of my father
--the local genitive:the local genitive being, not an adjunct to another noun, but the head of
the phrase,cannot be replaced by an of-adjunct, although it may form part of one:
at St.Andrew´s
At arm´s length
--with proper names of persons:there is commoner the construction the genitive, the of-
construction being used for the sake of balance,or in order to give more prominence to the
proper name.
Shakespeare´s plays
Love´s spirit
--with nouns denoting things: the blue of the sky looked marvellous
--adjectives used substantivally with a plural value cannot be used in the genitives.
The extensive use of the of-construction,which first appeared in the 12th century, is to some
extent due to French influence,though this influence should be exaggerated as we have seen
in the treatment of this subject.
7.the possessives.
Unlike many other languages, English uses possessives to refer to parts of the body and
personal belonging as well as in several other expressions_
8.Conclusion.
As you have seen, there are several ways of expressing possession,it depends on the type of
thing it refers to.
9.Bibliography.
-Quirk,R.”A grammar of Contemporary English”.Longman.London.1973.