Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development Plan Salvador
Development Plan Salvador
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of Parañaque City
District VII
PARAÑAQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BACLARAN
table of content
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
OBJECTIVE 1
Department of Education
Name of Teacher MARY JADE SALVADOR
Postion Title Teacher II Salary Grade 13
Parenthetical Title Secondary School Teacher Effectivity Date
Office Unit SDO Parañaque City
Reports to ERZENIA P. DE GUZMAN, Ph.D Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications Current Qualification
Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Science
Bachelor of Secondary Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18
Education professional unit in Education Master of Arts in Education Major in Educational
Management
Page 1 of 1
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
Division of Parañaque
PARAÑAQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL-TAMBO
NAIA Rd. Brgy. Tambo, Parañaque City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Basic
Education
1. Content 1. Applied knowledge
Knowledge and of content within and
June 2018
to March
7.50% Quality Showed
knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
No acceptable
evidence was
4 3 3.50 0.26
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across and across and across and
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence was
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
4 3 3.5 0.26
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
literacy and numeracy and across and across and across and
skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as and/or numeracy
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 skills as shown in
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic
Education
3. Applied a range of June 2018
teaching strategies to to March
7.50% Quality Used different
teaching
Used different
teaching
Used different
teaching
Used different
teaching
No acceptable
evidence was
3 4 3.5 0.26
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable 5 4 4.5 0.34
Education Environment classroom structure to March management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity to engage learners, 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
of Learners individually or in engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
groups, in in in in in
meaningful activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
exploration, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a
hands-on activities rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV any 1of the MOV
other given
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Managed learner June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education behavior to March management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of shown
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote
discipline to ensure positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and
learning- focused non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 4 3.5 3.75 0.28
Education and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning process learning
learning processes as shown in as shown in as shown in process as
to meet curriculum MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1
requirements and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
varied teaching
contexts.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning
learning process as evidently as evidently process as
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 and supported and supported in any 1 of the
and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the given MOV
by any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 4 3.5 0.34
Education collegial to March participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ shown
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results 0.26
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 5 4 4.5 0.34
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services organized and used 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT, to address learning address learning address learning address
address learning goals as shown goals as shown goals as shown learning goals
goals. in MOV1witha in MOV1witha in MOV 1 with a as shown in
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable
least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was
teaching and and learning and learning learning shown
learning resources, resources, resource,
resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently shown evidently shown as evidently
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and shown in any of
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by the acceptable
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education and Reporting selected, organized to March selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services and used 2019 organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence was
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated shown
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
learner attainment and and and and
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education promptly and to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and evidence was
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear shown
needs, progress communication communication communication communication
and achievement to of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
key stakeholders, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
including and and and and
parents/guardians. achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related shown
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning process learning process learning process learning process
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.9
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
B. DepEd Competencies
Core Behavioral: Self-Management Core Behavioral: Attendance
Registration Fees
Transportation Fees
Seminars on Education and its Profession May 2019-March 2020
Focus more on school work and ask assistance from
Sets personal goals and direction, needs and
relatives and friends to attend some important matters Learning Materials
development. not within school hours.
Core Skills: Computer and ICT Skills Core Skills: Service Management
Registration Fees
Participate on school's yearly outreach programs and Transportation Fees
May 2019-March 2020
community service.
Used Quipper Online to let the students engaged in Be engaged on different services that the school offers within and
different ICT programs and lessons outside the community.