Development Plan Salvador

You might also like

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of Parañaque City
District VII
PARAÑAQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BACLARAN

rpms portfolio for teacher I - iii (proficient teachers)

table of content

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
OBJECTIVE 1

MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)


MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 2 on
MOV 5 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 6 DLL 3 on
MOV 7 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 8 DLL 4 on
OBJECTIVE 2
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 2 on
MOV 5 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 6 DLL 3 on
MOV 7 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 8 DLL 4 on
OBJECTIVE 3
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 2 on
MOV 5 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 6 DLL 3 on
MOV 7 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 8 DLL 4 on
2. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND DIVERSITY
OBJECTIVE 4
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 2 on
MOV 5 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 6 DLL 3 on
MOV 7 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 8 DLL 4 on
OBJECTIVE 5
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 2 on
MOV 5 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 6 DLL 3 on
MOV 7 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 8 DLL 4 on
OBJECTIVE 6
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 3 on
KRA 3 : CURRICULUM AND PLANNING
OBJECTIVE 7
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 1 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 1 on
MOV 3 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 4 DLL 2 on
MOV 5 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 3 on (TOPIC)
MOV 6 DLL 3 on
MOV 7 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 8 DLL 4 on
OBJECTIVE 8
MOV 1 Personal Notes LAC/FGD 1 with proof of attendance
MOV 2 Personal Notes LAC/FGD 2 with proof of attendance
MOV 3 Personal Notes LAC/FGD 3 with proof of attendance
MOV 4 Personal Notes LAC/FGD 4 with proof of attendance
OBJECTIVE 9
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 2 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 2 on
KRA 4 : ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING
OBJECTIVE 10
MOV 1 Rating Sheet Observation Notes Form for COT 4 on (TOPIC)
MOV 2 DLL 4 on
OBJECTIVE 11
MOV 1 Class Records Grading Sheets for 1st Quarter
Summative Assessment Tool used in 2nd Quarter with TOS, Frequency of errors,
MOV 2
identified least mastered skills
MOV 3 DLLs in the 3rd Quarter showing index of mastery
MOV 4 Compilation of a learner's written work in the 4th Quarter with summary of result
with signature of parents
OBJECTIVE 12
MOV 1 Three(3) samples of corrected test papers in the 1st Quarter of the same 3 learner
parents' or guardians' signature and date of receipt
MOV 2 Minutes of PTA Meeting in All Quarters with proof of parents' guardians' attendance
MOV 3 Sample Report cards with parents'/guardians' in All Quarters
MOV 4 Communication letter sent to parents'/guardians' during the 4th Quarter
KRA 5 : PLUS FACTOR
OBJECTIVE 13
MOV 1 Certificate of recognition or participation
MOV 2 Certification of Committe Involvement
MOV 3 Certificate of mentoring for pre-service teacher
MOV 4 Certificate of Coaching learners in completion
RPMS TOOLS FOR TEACHER 1-III
PROFICIENT TEACHER

POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. _________ Revision Code: 00

Department of Education
Name of Teacher MARY JADE SALVADOR
Postion Title Teacher II Salary Grade 13
Parenthetical Title Secondary School Teacher Effectivity Date
Office Unit SDO Parañaque City
Reports to ERZENIA P. DE GUZMAN, Ph.D Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications Current Qualification
Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Science
Bachelor of Secondary Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18
Education professional unit in Education Master of Arts in Education Major in Educational
Management

Experience None required None required

Eligibility RA 1080, PD 907 Licensure Examination for Teacher, CSC Eligibility

Trainings None required None required

B. Preferred Qualifications Current Qualification


BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with education units (18-21), MA units 18 Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Science
Education units
Master of
Arts in Education Major in Educational Management

Experience Years in Service 3 years

Eligibility PBET/LET Passers(Indicate the Scores) LET Passer/75.00%

Trainings TrainingS/Seminars Mid Year and Year End IN-SET,GAD

Duties and Responsibilities


1. Applies mastery of content knowledge and its application across learning areas
2. Facilitates learning using appropriate and innovative teaching strategies and classroom management practices
3. Manages an environment conducive to learning
4. Addresses learner diversity
5. Implements and supervises curricular and co-curricular programs to support learning
6. Monitors and evaluates learners’ progress and undertakes activities to improve performance
7. Maintains updated records of learners’ progress
8. Counsels and guides learners
9. Works with relevant stakeholders, both internal and external, to promote learning and improve school performance
10. Undertakes activities towards personal and professional growth
11. Does related work - Class Adviser,ICT/LIS Coordinator

Page 1 of 1
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
Division of Parañaque
PARAÑAQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL-TAMBO
NAIA Rd. Brgy. Tambo, Parañaque City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: SALVADOR, MARY JADE S. Name of Rater: .


Position: TEACHER I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period: DIVISION OF PARANAQUE
S.Y. 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
KRA
Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic
Education
1. Content 1. Applied knowledge
Knowledge and of content within and
June 2018
to March
7.50% Quality Showed
knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
No acceptable
evidence was
4 3 3.50 0.26
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across and across and across and
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence was
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
4 3 3.5 0.26
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
literacy and numeracy and across and across and across and
skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as and/or numeracy
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 skills as shown in
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)

Basic
Education
3. Applied a range of June 2018
teaching strategies to to March
7.50% Quality Used different
teaching
Used different
teaching
Used different
teaching
Used different
teaching
No acceptable
evidence was
3 4 3.5 0.26
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given MOV
supported by supported by any1 supported by any
any1ofthe other of the other given 1of the other given
given MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable 5 4 4.5 0.34
Education Environment classroom structure to March management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity to engage learners, 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
of Learners individually or in engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
groups, in in in in in
meaningful activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
exploration, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a
hands-on activities rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments. Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV any 1of the MOV
other given
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Managed learner June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education behavior to March management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of shown
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote
discipline to ensure positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and
learning- focused non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the of the given evidence was
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as shown
as observed in as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only
at least 4 lessons lessons 1 lesson
lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4 3.5 3.75 0.28
Education differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
Services developmentally 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
appropriate learning strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
experiences to address learner address learner address learner address learner
address learners’ diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
gender, needs, shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
strengths, interests with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
and experiences. of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 4 differentiated differentiated at least 4 evidence was
differentiated teaching teaching lessons as shown
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2 observed in 3
strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as lessons as
least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by observed in 2
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and lessons
MOV 1 and supported by supported by observed in only
supported by any1ofthe other any1ofthe other 1 lesson
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV differentiated
other acceptable teaching
MOV strategy in only
1 lesson as
evidently shown
in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 4 3.5 3.75 0.28
Education and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning process learning
learning processes as shown in as shown in as shown in process as
to meet curriculum MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1
requirements and rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
varied teaching
contexts.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning
learning process as evidently as evidently process as
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 and supported and supported in any 1 of the
and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the given MOV
by any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 4 3.5 0.34
Education collegial to March participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ shown
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable


least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ in evidence was
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as any 1 of the shown
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown given MOV
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results 0.26
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 5 4 4.5 0.34
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services organized and used 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT, to address learning address learning address learning address
address learning goals as shown goals as shown goals as shown learning goals
goals. in MOV1witha in MOV1witha in MOV 1 with a as shown in
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable
least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was
teaching and and learning and learning learning shown
learning resources, resources, resource,
resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently shown evidently shown as evidently
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and shown in any of
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by the acceptable
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
any 1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education and Reporting selected, organized to March selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services and used 2019 organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool evidence was
assessment assessment assessment as evidently shown
tools as tools as tools as shown in any of
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable
inany1ofthe inany1ofthe in any1ofthe MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence was
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated shown
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
learner attainment and and and and
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable


combination of combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV evidence was
at least 4 of the of the of the shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.26
Education promptly and to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and evidence was
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear shown
needs, progress communication communication communication communication
and achievement to of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
key stakeholders, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
including and and and and
parents/guardians. achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No acceptable


combination of combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given evidence was
at least 4 of the of the of the MOV shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 5 5 0.5
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related shown
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning process learning process learning process learning process
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable


least 4 different different kinds of different kinds of of the evidence was
kinds of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 3.9
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 -5.000 Outstanding


3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

SHAROL I. SEGARRA MARY JADE S. SALVADOR ERZENIA P. DE GUZMAN, Ph.D


Rater Ratee Approving Authority
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of Parañaque City
District VII
PARAÑAQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL - TAMBO

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Adjectival Rating Numerical Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives VERY SATISFACTORY 3.910


Ratee-Rater Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Name of Employee: MARY JADE S. SALVADOR Name of Rater: SHAROL I. SEGARRA
Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER 1
Signature: Signature:
Date: 22-Apr-19 Date:
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF THE IPCRF (IPCRF-DP)
Strengths Development Needs Action Plan (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
A. Teaching Competencies (PPST)
KRA No: 5 KRA No: 1

Plus Factor Content and Knowledge Pedagogy


Internet Connection
Since the teacher is handling Filipino subject, Attend seminars about proper selection of appropriate Laptop
Objective No: `13 Objective May 2019-March 2020
which is farNo: 1
beyond the teacher's teaching approaches, content and pedagogy on Filipino Printer
specialization, the teacher must study and Projector
Able to finished Masters Degree Program relevant learn more about the topics assigned to
for the development and improvement of both teach.
learners and the teacher.

B. DepEd Competencies
Core Behavioral: Self-Management Core Behavioral: Attendance
Registration Fees
Transportation Fees
Seminars on Education and its Profession May 2019-March 2020
Focus more on school work and ask assistance from
Sets personal goals and direction, needs and
relatives and friends to attend some important matters Learning Materials
development. not within school hours.
Core Skills: Computer and ICT Skills Core Skills: Service Management
Registration Fees
Participate on school's yearly outreach programs and Transportation Fees
May 2019-March 2020
community service.
Used Quipper Online to let the students engaged in Be engaged on different services that the school offers within and
different ICT programs and lessons outside the community.

MARY JADE S. SALVADOR SHAROL I. SEGARRA ERZENIA P. DE GUZMAN Ph.D.


TEACHER I MASTER TEACHER 1 Secondary School Principal I
RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

You might also like