Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 11 & 12
Lecture 11 & 12
• To remove very fine particles which are not settled with coagulant
and plain sedimentation.
Filters
Filters
Nowadays, rapid sand filters are most commonly used. The water from the
coagulation-sedimentation plant directly fed into the rapid gravity filters.
Slow sand filter (SSF)
Constituents of Slow sand filter
• Enclosure tank:
• Open water-tight rectangular tank made of masonry or concrete.
• Bed slope: 1 in 100.
• Depth: 2.5 to 3.5 m.
• Plan area: 100 to 2000 m2 or more (Depends on quality of water to
be treated).
• Filter media:
• Sand layers of 90 to 110 cm deep placed over a gravel support.
• Effective size (D10) of the sand = 0.2 to 0.4 mm.
• Uniformity coefficient (D60/D10) varies from 1.8 to 3.0
• Base Material:
• Base material is gravel.
• In total 30 to 75 cm thick.
• Laid in 3-4 layer, starting from coarsest at the bottom to finest at the
top.
• At the bottom size = 40 to 65 mm.
• At the top size = 20 to 40 mm.
Now six units are to be used, out of them one has to be kept as stand-by, and hence only 5 units
should provide the necessary area of filter required
Solution Contd……
The area of each filter unit = Total area required/5
= 3125/5 = 625 sq. m
Lets assume L = length and B = breadth of each unit, then according to question
L=2B
Thus 2B . B = 625
So B = 17.7 m = 18 m (say)
Now L = 2*18 = 36 m
Hence use 6 filter units with one unit as stand-by, each unit of size 36 m * 18 m
Rapid sand filter (mechanical sand filter)
• Base Material:
• Like slow sand filter, the base material is gravel.
• In addition to supporting sand layer, it distributes wash water and hence careful
grading is very important.
• Total 60 to 90 cm thick.
• Laid in 5-6 layer, starting from coarsest at the bottom to finest at the top.
• At the bottom size = 20 to 40 mm.
• Intermediate layer size = 12 to 20 and 6 to 12 mm.
• At the top size = 3 to 6 mm.
Under-drainage system:
Unlike slow sand filter, under drainage system for rapid gravity filters serves two
purposes.
• Rate of back wash water flow: 300-900 litres/min /m2 of filter area.
• Rate of filtration: 50-100 litres/ min/m2 of filter area.
• Therefore, rate of back wash water flow is 6-18 times greater than the rate of
filtration.
• The design of under drainage system depend on uniform distribution of back
wash water.
• Types of under-drainage system:
a) Manifold and lateral system (mostly used)
b)The wheeler bottom
c) Porous plate bottom
• In pipe and strainer system, compressed air is used to back wash the filter,
hence saving the wash water.
• In perforated system ( when no strainers are used), the water jet is used for
back wash and the required velocity is very high – 600 to 800 litre/min/m2 of
filter area, known as high velocity wash.
• When strainers are used wash water is required at the rate of 250 to 300
litre/min/m2 of filter area because compressed air assists in agitating sand
particles , known as slow velocity wash.
Design considerations
• Total c/s area of perforations should be about 0.2% of the total filter area.
• The c/s area of the manifold should be twice the c/s area of lateral drains.
Where,
hL is frictional head loss (m)
v is approach velocity or filtration velocity (m/s)
D is depth of filter (m)
Φ is shape factor for non-spherical particles
d is dia. of sand particles (m)
n is porosity
CD is drag coefficient
f is mass fraction of sand particles of dia. d
Working and cleaning of rapid gravity filters
Backwashing
• Valves 1 and 4 open (normal condition)
• Valves 5 and 6 open (1 & 4 closed)
• 5 closed
• 2 open
• Valves 1 and 3 open (6 & 2 closed)
• 3 closed 4 open
Working and cleaning of rapid gravity filters
• Back washing require about 15 min time.
• Amount of water required for back wash vary from 2 to 5 % of total
amount of water filtered.
• Rapid gravity filters are required to wash every 24 to 48 hrs.
• Rate of filtration: 3000 to 6000 ltrs/hr/m2 of filter area.
• Efficiency: 80 to 90% efficient in bacteria removal, therefore less efficient
than slow sand filter.
• Rapid gravity filters are best and most economical, therefore, most widely
used.
• However, it is less safer as compared to slow sand filter and hence require
further treatment before supply.
Operational difficulties in rapid gravity filters
• Formation of mud balls
• Accumulation of mud on the sand surface.
• if inadequate washing is done, mud may sink into the sand bed and
stick to the sand grains, thereby forming mud balls.
• Size of mud balls gradually increases.
• May sink down to gravel layer and interfere with upward movement of
water during back wash.
• Mud balls may be broken by mechanical rakes, using water stream or
injecting compressed air.
• Sometimes caustic soda, is used to soak the filter bed for 12 hours,
then agitated with air-wash.8 hours later filter bed is washed until clear
water comes out.
• If filter gets badly clogged, entire filter bed may be replaced
• Cracking of filters:
• Shrinkage cracks develop at the wall junctions when fine sand
contained in the top layers shrinks.
• Cracks gradually propagates through filter sand.
• The floc, mud and other impurities get arrested in the crack and thus
effecting both washing of filter and rate of filtration.
Problem: Design a rapid sand filter unit for 4 MLD of supply.
Water required per day = 4 ML
Assuming that 4% of filtered water is required for washing of the filter every day, we have
Total filtered water required per day = 1.04 * 4 ML = 4.16 MLD
Further assuming that 0.5hr is lost everyday in washing the filter, we have
Filter water required per hour = 4.16/23.5 = 0.177 ML/hr
Also assuming rate of filtration to be 5000 litres/hr/sq.m, we have
The area of filter required = (0.177*106/5000) m2 = 35.4 m2
Assuming L = 1.5 time B, two beds, the total area provided
2*(L*B) = 35.4
3 B2 = 35.4
B = 3.43 m
L = 1.5 *3.43 = 5.14 m (say 5.2 m)
B = 35.4/5.2 = 3.4 m
Hence adopt 2 filter units each of dimension 5.2 m * 3.4 m
Comparison of Slow Sand Filter and Rapid Sand Filter
SSF RSF
• No pre-treatment (coagulation, • Required
flocculation or sedimentation) required
• Base material is gravel of size 3-65 mm • Size 3-40 mm and depth 60-90 cm
and 30-75 cm in depth
• Effective size of filter sand is 0.2-0.4
mm and uniformity coefficient 1.8-2.5 • 0.35-0.55 and 1.2-1.8 respectively
• Under drainage system is laid to • to receive clear water as well as to
receive filtered water pass water for back washing
• Size of each unit is large 100-2000 m2 • small size 10 to 80 m2
• Rate of filtration is small, 100 to 200 • large 3000 to 6000 lits/hr/sq m
lits/hr/sq m
• High initial cost of land and material • Low initial cost but high cost of
operation and maintenance
Comparison of Slow Sand Filter and Rapid Sand Filter
SSF RSF
• Very efficient in removing bacteria • Efficient in removing turbid, coloured
upto 99 % but less effective in water but less efficient in removing
removing turbidity and colour bacteria (80 to 90 %)
• Require lesser space and filtering material for treating same quantity of
water because rate of filtration is 2 to 5 times greater than rapid gravity
filters.
• Economical for treating smaller quantities of water (for ex. Swimming pools).
• Since the water coming out with sufficiently high head re-pumping of the
filtered water is not required.
Disadvantages of pressure filters
• Although rate of filtration is high, filter unit being smaller, overall
capacity of the plant is small.
• Since the filtration and back washing takes place in closed container,
proper quality control is not possible.
• Diatomite filters
• Raw water is allowed to pass through a diatomite deposit
(sedimentary deposit of silica) that acts like a filter
• Small potable filters developed by Army.
• Useful for field applications.
Disinfection or Sterilisation
• The filtered water obtained from slow/rapid sand filters may contain
harmful disease producing bacteria.
• In case of emergencies such as water supply for army during war times;
sedimentation and coagulation can not be done, however, sterilisation is
the only treatment process applied in raw water.
• Disinfection not only removes existing bacteria from the water, but also
ensures its immediate killing even afterwards in the distribution
system.
• Chlorine is the most ideal disinfectant and thus this process is also
known as Chlorination.
Other minor methods of disinfection
• Boiling of water
• Effective for removal of bacteria but further contamination can not be
avoided.
• Treatment with excess lime
• Excess lime kills bacteria, however before consuming excess lime needs
to be removed from water.
• Treatment with ozone
• Ozone breaks into O2 and free oxygen which is a very good disinfectant.
However, it is very costly.
• Treatment with iodine and bromide
• Used as pills to kill the bacteria, not useful for large municipal water
treatment
• Treatment with ultra-violet rays
• Very effective as disinfectant, however, costly.
• Useful for small domestic plant, hospitals etc.