Statutory Construction

Format Notes:
1. Badge - nature and keywords of the case
2. Caption - title, date, citation, ponente
3. Syllabus - italicized in SCRA, relevant doctrine
4. Facts - narrative and procedural
5. Issues connected to Stat Con
6. Ruling - words of SC
7. Dispositive portion

Boys Girls
1 1)The Government of the Philippines Islands v HSBC, GR. No. 44 2
3 (3.1)Antonio v COMELEC 4
5 (4)Tanada v Tuvera 6
7 (5.2)Daoang v Municipal Judge 8
9 (6.2) Endencia vs David 10
11 (7.2) People vs. Concepcion 12
13 (8.2) Floresca vs Philex 14
15 (9.2)Saguisag et al v Ochoa 16
17 (10.2)People v Purisima 18
19 (11.1)Del Mar v Pagcor et al 20
21 (11.3) In re Allen 22
23 (13.1) In re Maxshoop 24
25 (13.3) Angara vs Electoral Commision 26
27 (13.5) Republic vs Cagandahan 28
29 (14.2) US vs Go Chico 30
31 (15.2) NPC vs City of Cabanatuan 32
33 (17.1) Office of the Court Administrator vs Garong 34
35 (18) Duncan vs CFI 36
37 (20.1) Bagong Bayani vs Comelec 38
39 (20.3) Francisco vs HOR 40
41 (20.5) Chavez vs JBC 42
43 (21.1) Caudal vs CA 44
45 (21.3) Florentino vs PNB 46
47 (21.5) Manila Railroad Co. vs Collector 48
49 (21.6) Collector vs Manila Lodge No. 761 50
51 (21.8) Geotina vs CA 52
53 (21.10) Pilar vs COMELEC 54
55 (21.12A) Buenaseda vs Secretary Flavier 56
57 (21.13) Mutuc vs COMELEC G.R.No.L-32717 58
59 (21.15) Sarmiento III vs Mison 60
61 (21.17) People vs Manantan 62
63 (21.19) Mapa vs Arroyo 64
65 (21.21) US vs Hart 66
67 (21.23) Sterling Selections Corp. vs LLDA 68
69 (21.25) Director of Lands vs CA 70
71 (21.27) Diokno vs Rehabilitation Finance Corp. 72
73 (21.29) Microsoft Corp vs Manansala 74
75 (22.1) Manila Jockey Club Inc. vs GAB G.R.No.L-12727 76
77 (22.3) Commisioner vs Esso 78
79 (22.5) Manila Jockey Club Inc vs GAB, supra 80
81 (22.7) Gaanan vs IAC 82
83 (22.9) Bengzon vs Secretary of Justice 84
85 (22.11) Philippine Global Communications Inc vs Relova 86
87 (22.13) US vs De Guzman 88
89 (23.2) LLDA vs CA 90
91 (23.4) US vs Soliman 92
93 (24.2) Senarillos vs Hermosisima 94
95 (24.4) People vs Macarandang 96
97 (25.1) Lambert vs Fox G.R.No.7991 98
99 (25.3) Abad vs Goldloop 100

Note: All cases in the syllabus (both in the footnotes and boxes) are included.
Notes:
Hand Written
Bond Paper: Long (8.5"x13")
Margins: 1" - all sides
No Correction Ink / Tape

Make a Table of Contents

Ring Bound
Sumission date: A week before Final Exam

Girls
(2)Eugenio v Drilon GR No. 109404, January 22, 1996
(3.2)Tatad v DOE
(5.1)People v Mapa
(6.1)Alonzo v IAC
(7.1) Nitafan vs CIR
(8.1) Tanada vs Yulo
(9.1) Globe-Mackay and Radio Corp vs NLRC and Salazar
(10.1)Salvacion v Central Bank
(10.3)Matabuena v Cervantes
(11.2)People v Nazario
(12) Lopez & Sons Inc. vs CTA
(13.2) Whitelight Corp vs City of Manila
(13.4) Caltex vs. Palomar
(14.1) Centeno vs Villalon Pornillos
(15.1) Marinduque Iron Mines vs Municipal Council
(16) International Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Secretary
(17.2) Provincial Sherrif of Rizal vs CA
(19) San Juan vs CSC
(20.2) Manila Prince Hotel vs GSIS
(20.4) De Castro vs JBC
(20.6) David vs Senate Electoral Tribunal
(21.2) City of Baguio vs Marcos G.R.No.L-26100
(21.4) People vs Yabut
(21.6) David vs CA G.R.No.L-57719-21
(21.7) Gatchalian vs COMELEC
(21.9) Claudio vs COMELEC G.R.No.140560
(21.11) Manila Herald Publishing vs Ramos
(21.12B) Ledesma vs CA
(21.14) Cagayan Valley Enterprises vs CA
(21.16) Pepsi Cola Products Phils. Inc. vs Secretary of Labor
(21.18) People vs Tamani
 (21.20) Paras vs COMELEC G.R.No.123169
(21.22) Mercado et. al. vs NLRC
(21.24) In re McGee vs Republic
(21.26) Bersabal vs Salvador
(21.28) RMBSA vs HDMF
(21.30) In re The Intestate Estate of Pedro Satillon
(22.2) Lagman et. al vs Medialdea et. al.
(22.4) Filipinas Life Assurance Company vs CTA
(22.6) Astorga vs Villegas
(22.8) League of Cities vs COMELEC
(22.10) Navarro et. al vs Executive Secretary
(22.12) Escosura vs San Miguel Brewery Inc. G.R.No.L-1669
(23.1) Mecano vs COA
(23.3) Dreamwork Construction vs Janiola
(24.1) Universal Corn Products Inc et. al vs Rice and Corn Board
(24.3) People vs Lucero
(24.5) People vs Jabinal
(25.2) Manila Banking Corp. vs Teodro
(25.4) NIA vs Gamit

s) are included.