Moire Fringes and the Conic Sections

Author(s): M. R. Cullen
Source: The College Mathematics Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5 (Nov., 1990), pp. 370-378
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Mathematical Association of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2686902
Accessed: 24-05-2018 16:22 UTC

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms

Mathematical Association of America, Taylor & Francis, Ltd. are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The College Mathematics Journal

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 Moir4 Fringes and the Conic Sections
M. Ft. Cullen

Mike Cullen is Professor of Mathematics and former chairman

at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, and has been a
faculty member at Grinnell College, L.S.U., and New Mexico
Highlands University. He received his Ph.D. in mathematics at
age 24 from the University of Iowa and has done post-graduate
work in biomathematics at the University of Washington. His
publications include research papers in classical complex analy?
sis and two undergraduate books in mathematical biology. He
takes special delight in uncovering nonstandard applications of
undergraduate mathematics.

When two geometric patterns are superimposed, additional geometric patterns

(known as moire patterns) may become visible. In the "Op Art" posters of the
1960's two superimposed screens create additional images that appear to change
rapidly with the slightest movement of the viewer [2, pp. 239-252], [3], [12]. To
create a moire or "watered" silk, two layers of ribbed silk are steam pressed
together and a third pattern emerges which resembles reflections on the surface of
a pool of water [5]. The scientific applications of the mathematical theory of
overlapping geometric patterns range from wave interference phenomena in physics
to the detection of stress patterns in metals and of aberrations in lenses [4], [5],
[11]. Two objects can be positioned precisely by arranging for moire patterns to
appear with any small displacement in alignment [8]. Particular examples will be
given later in the paper.
Figure 1 shows a family of concentric circles that has been superimposed on a
grid of horizontal lines. A third family of oval-shaped curves, the moire pattern of
the two original families of curves, can be clearly seen near the vertical bisector of
the figure. Notice that each individual oval (or moire fringe) appears as the eye
follows successive intersections of lines and circles. The moire fringes arising from

Figure 1

370 THE COLLEGE MATHEMATICS JOURNAL

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
such families of lines and circles are indeed conic sections, as we will show. We
first explain exactly how these fringes are formed.

General Moire Fringes

Let f(x, y) = c denote the family of level curves of a function of two variables.
When the collection of values that c assumes is discrete, we call the family a
grating and write fix, y) = cm, where m ranges over a set of consecutive integers
and ck<ck+l. Moire fringes are formed from points of intersection of two gratings.
If, for a particular m and n, point P is an intersection point of fix, y) = am and
gix,y) = bn, we will record (m,n) as the grating coordinates of P. In Figure 2,
A = (m + 1, n-l), B = (m-1, n + 1), C = (m - 1, n-l), and D =
<m + l,n + l>. Note that A,P, and B each have m+nas the sum of their grat
coordinates. Thus a moire fringe through A,P, and B may be found by solvin
system

fix,y) =am
gix,y) =bn

subject to the condition that m + n = a, a fixed integer. The set of all such curves,
generated from different values of a, is a moire pattern. Likewise, the difference
between the first and second coordinates of C, P, and D is m ?n, and so a second
moire fringe may be found by solving the same system subject to the condition
m ? n = a.

The moire fringe with the smaller diagonal distance (

2) is the fringe that the eye perceives. The relative re
diagonal distances may change as one grating slides over
some dramatic op art effects. Note that AB is the small
9 in Figure 2 is acute. Since 6 is equal to the angle bet
and Vg, it follows that cos0= -(V/)-(Vg)/(||-V/|| ||V
conclude that the moire pattern corresponding to
regions for which

df dg df dg
-+-<0
dx dx dy dy

and the moire pattern corresponding to m?n=a is visible in thos

8(x,y) = bn + K DJ(x,y) = am + 1
g(x,y) = bn
fix,y) = am

fix,y) = am_x
B

Figure 2

VOL. 21, NO. 5, NOVEMBER 1990 371

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
which

df dg df dg
-+->0
dx dx dy dy

[11, pp. 14-17].

Circular and Line Gratings

The radii of the circles in Figure 1 increase by a fixed amount p calle
the circular grating. The distance between the horizontal lines is kp
constant A > 0, and we will call this distance the pitch of the lin
corresponding system may be written as

x2+y2 (mp)
y = n{kp),

where m and n range over the integers. From the partials condition we see that a
fringe is visible in the upper half plane y > 0 when we impose the condition
m-n=a. Although it can be proved algebraically that this fringe is a conic (by
solving the corresponding system), it is much easier to give a demonstration that
uses the polar definition of a conic: A conic is the set of all points P such that the
ratio of the distance from P to a fixed point F to the distance from P to a fixed
line / is a constant (called the eccentricity of the conic).
Let / denote the fixed horizontal line y= -a(Xp) and let P = (0,0) be the
fixed point. If P=(m,n), then, as illustrated in Figure 3, d(P,F) = mp and
d(p, /) = n(Xp) + a(\p). Using the condition m - n = a, it follows that the ratio

d(P,F)_
mp

d(P,/) ~ kp(n + a)
is constant and so P lies on a conic with eccentricit
(which uses the condition m + n = a) can be given f
plane y < 0. We may therefore conclude:
1. If the pitch of the circular grating equals the pit
family of parabolas is formed with common focus at
for a an integer.

y = n(Xp)

y= -a(\p)

Figure 3

372 THE COLLEGE MATHEMATICS JOURNAL

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 2. If the pitch of the lines is greater than that of the circles (i.e., A > 1), a family
of ellipses is formed as in Figure 1. Each ellipse has one focus at (0,0) and
eccentricity 1/A.
3. If the pitch of the lines is less than that of the circles (i.e., 0 < A < 1), a family
of hyperbolas is formed. Each hyperbola has one focus at (0,0) and eccentricity
1/A.
The third case is illustrated in Figure 4. These three cases can be presented to a
class using transparencies and an overhead projector. The images are quite
pleasing to observe and it is not necessary to align the circles and lines carefully to
see the moire fringes.

Figure 4

Two Circular Gratings

If the centers of two identical circular gratings each of pitch p are positioned at a
distance of 2c from each other, the equations of the two families of curves can be
written as

(x + c)2+y2 = (mp)2
and

(x-c)2+y2 = (np)2,
where m and n range over the positive integers. If Fx =(-c,0), P2 = (c,0), and
P = (jc, y), then the equations may be expressed as
d{P,Fx)=mp
d(P,F2)=np.
The condition m ?n=a is equivalent to mp ? np=ap or

d(P,Fi)-d(P9F2)=ap.

Thus the corresponding moire fringes are hyperbolas with foci at Fx and
Likewise the condition m + n = a leads to a family of ellipses with foci at F{ a
F2. The hyperbolas can be clearly seen in Figure 5 as the partials conditi
predicts. The ellipses are more apparent when the distance between the centers
increased.

VOL. 21, NO. 5, NOVEMBER 1990 373

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 Figure 5

We can also consider circular gratings for which the distance between successive
circles is not constant. For example, in a regular Fresnel zone grating, the area of
each ring is equal to the area of the center circle. Thus, if rn denotes the radius of
the nth circle,

irrZ+l-irrZ = irp2
or

2 2 2

where rx =p. It follows

sented by x2 +y2 = np2
positioned 2 c units apar

(x + c) -\-y2 = m

(x-c) -\-y2 = n

In this case it is easier t

impose the condition
ap2 or x = ap2/(4c). Th

Figure 6

374 THE COLLEGE MATHEMATICS JOURNAL

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
composed of vertical lines. If we impose the condition m + n = a and add the
two equations, we obtain the family of circles x2-\-y2 = \{ap2 ? 1c2). Set r2 =
\{ap2 - 2c2) and note that r2+1 = r2 + \p2. The area of each ring is therefore
\irp2. Thus the second moire pattern is itself a special Fresnel zone grating (see
Figure 7). As the centers of the original two Fresnel zone gratings are moved
apart, you will also see additional circular moire fringes that correspond to side
conditions of the form m + fin = a.

Figure 7

Physical Applications
A ripple tank creates moire fringes from the superposition of the crests of two
wave trains. A train of horizontal waves may be generated by dipping a ruler into
the surface of the water with a certain frequency, while circular waves are easily
formed by dipping a pencil into the tank. If wave trains are generated simultane?
ously from two such sources, the moire fringes correspond to positions where
double crests are formed. These appear as bright regions when the wave pattern is
projected onto the screen of the ripple tank. Excellent ripple tank photos are given
in many physics texts (see, e.g. [7]).
Moire patterns can be used for the precise linear and angular positioning of
objects. Typically, one grating is fixed to an object which is then viewed through an
identical transparent master grating. If the previously aligned object is displaced, a
moire pattern will be visible. For example, to obtain a continuous record of the
movement of a building during an earthquake, a high speed camera can record the
moire patterns formed when a line grating on a wall is viewed through a second
line grating [1].
When two identical line gratings of pitch p are superimposed, the moire pattern
is again a family of parallel lines with pitch p/(2 sin(0/2)), where 6 is the acute
angle that the lines make with one another. Note that when 6 is near zero, the
moire fringes are far apart and the slightest displacement of the gratings causes
the fringes to move rapidly (see Figure 8). Aside from alignment problems in
optics, this key property can be used to detect loose thermal-protection tiles on the
space shuttle [10], to align cloth while being heat set [9], and to detect movement
of teeth [6]!

VOL 21, NO. 5, NOVEMBER 1990 375

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 Figure 8

If the two line gratings are placed on a circular grating of the same pitch, three
moire patterns are visible?two families of parabolas formed from the circular
grating and each line grating, and a third family formed by the circular grating and
the linear fringes of the two line gratings (see Figures 9 and 10). When 0 < 60?, A
= l/(2sin(0/2)) > 1 and so this third family is a family of ellipses. When 0 = 60?,
the pitch of the moire pattern is again p, and a third family of parabolas is formed.
This provides us with a visual way of positioning the two line gratings at an angle
of 60?. The method can be accommodated to an angle 0O other than 60? by
adjusting the pitch (A = \ sec 0O) of the second line grating.

Figure 9
0<6O?

376 THE COLLEGE MATHEMATICS JOURNAL

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
 Figure 10
0>6O?

Projects for Students

The following moire fringe problems are well within the capabilities o
calculus students. Students can experiment with transparencies or com
anticipate or verify their results:
1. Find the moire fringes that result from the two families of lines

y = mp

y = 5X + nirp)

for m and n integers and s and r fixed real numbers. (The second family of lines
has pitch (r cos 6)p, where s = tan 0.)
2. Find the moire fringes that result when the Fresnel zone grating x2+y2 = mp2
is placed on a grid of horizontal lines y = niXp).
3. The centers Fx and F2 of circular gratings of pitches p and Xp, respectively
are positioned at a distance of 2c from one another. Show that the moire fringes
may be described as {P:AdiP,Fl)?diP,F2) is constant}. When A # 1, these
curves are not conies. Experiment with circular gratings to discover the shapes of
these curves.
4. The moire pattern corresponding to m + n = a is visible in those regions for
which

df dg df dg
-+-<0.
dx dx dy dy

Use this criterion to explain why the centers of the circular gratings in Figure
must be pulled apart in order for the elliptical fringes to be seen. Perform a similar
analysis for the Fresnel zone plates in Figure 6.

VOL 21, NO. 5, NOVEMBER 1990 377

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
References

1. R. Chang and C. Lin, Test the high building vibration and the deformation during an earthquake by
high speed camera with moire fringe technique, Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for
Optical Engineering 497 (1984) 36-39.
2. M. Gardner, Martin Gardner's Sixth Book of Mathematical Games from Scientific American, W. H.
Freeman, New York, 1971.
3. G. Oster, Optical art, Applied Optics 4 (11), (1965) 1359-1369.
4. _, Moire patterns, Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, McGraw-Hill, 1985, pp. 299-301.
5. G. Oster and Y. Nishijima, Moire patterns, Scientific American 208 (5), (1963) 54-63.
6. R. L. Paterson et a!., A technique for real time measurement of tooth eruption, Proceedings of the
Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2 (1987) 737-8.
7. Physical Science Study Committee, Physics, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA, 1960, Chapters 17 and 18.
8. C. A. Sciammarella, The moire method?a review, Experimental Mechanics 22 (11) (1982) 418-433.
9. Thomas P. Sheahen, Opportunities to apply physics to energy conservation problems in process
industries: examples from textiles and papermaking, Proceedings of Conference on Physics Careers,
Employment and Education, State College PA, 1-3, 1978, pp. 201-206.
10. W. L. Snow, et al., Dynamic moire methods for detection of loosened space shuttle tiles, NASA,
Report No: NASA-TM-83205, Sept. 1981, 17 pages.
11. P. S. Theocaris, Moire Fringes in Strain Analysis, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, 1969.
12. W. Witschi, Moires, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 12B (1-2), 1986, pp. 363-378.

(Reviewers, continued from page 369.)

Hurley, U. of Connecticut; Martin Isaacs, U. of Wisconsin, Madison; Walther Janous, Innsbruck,
Austria; Charles Jepsen, Grinnell C; Elgin Johnston, Iowa State U.; Charles Jones, Grinnell C;
Zaven Karian, Denison U.; Jerome Keisler, U. of Wisconsin, Madison; Paul Kelly, Santa Barbara,
CA; James R. King, U. of Washington; L. R. King, Davidson C; Roger Kirchner, Carleton C;
David Klein, California State U., Northridge; Benjamin G. Klein, Davidson C; Vivian Kraines,
Meredith C; Joseph B. Kruskal, AT&T Bell Laboratories; Lester H. Lange, San Jose State U.; L.
Carl Leinbach, Gettysburg C; Louis Leithold, Pacific Palisades, CA; Tung-Po Lin, California State
U., Northridge; Peter Lindstrom, North Lake C; Andy Liu, U. of Alberta; Donna Llewellyn,
Georgia Tech.; Robin Lock, St. Lawrence U.; Antonio Lopez, Jr., Loyola U., New Orleans; Robert
Lopez, Rose-Hulman Institute; B. Pauline Lowman, Western Kentucky U.; William F. Lucas,
Claremont Graduate School; Roy Luke, Los Angeles Pierce C; Rajindar Singh Luthar, Janesville,
WI; Frederick Luttmann, Sonoma State U.; W. A. J. Luxemburg, Caltech; Joseph Malkevitch,
York C, Jamaica, NY; Colin L. Mallows, AT&T Bell Laboratories; Stephen Maurer, Swarthmore
C; Thomas R. McCutcheon, Los Angeles Pierce C; Richard McIntosh, U. of Regina; B. Arthur
Miller, Mount Allison U.; Charles G. Moore, Northern Arizona U.; Jerry Moreno, John Carroll
U.; Frank Morgan, Williams C; Roy Myers, Pennsylvania State U., New Kensington; Richard D.
Neidinger, Davidson C; Yves Nievergelt, Eastern Washington U.; Andrew M. Odlyzko, AT&T
Bell Laboratories; Morris Orzech, Queen's U., Kingston; Arnold Ostebee, St. Olaf C; Paul R.
Patten, North Georgia C; Brian Peterson, San Jose State U.; Richard Pfiefer, San Jose State U.;
Stephen Pierce, San Diego State U.; John Poole, Furman U.; Gerald Porter, U. of Pennsylvania;
Charles Rees, U. of New Orleans; Amy Rocha, San Jose State U.; Edwin Rogers, Siena C; Mary
Rosen, California State U., Northridge; Kenneth Ross, U. of Oregon; Edward Rozema, U. of
Tennessee; Dieter Ruoff, U. of Regina; Hans Sagan, North Carolina State U.; Paul Schaefer,
Honeoye, NY; Mark Schilling, California State U., Northridge; George Schnibben, Francis Marion
C; Alan Schoenfeld, U. of California, Berkeley; William C. Schulz, Northern Arizona U.; Jon
Scott, Montgomery C; J. Arthur Seebach, St. Olaf C; Judy Seery, AT&T Bell Laboratories;
Annie Alexander Selden, Tennessee Technical U.; Lester Senechal, Mount Holyoke C; Donald
R. Sherbert, U. of Illinois; Tatiana Deretsky Shubin, San Jose State U.; David B. Singmaster,
Polytech. of the South Bank, London; Daniel Sloughter, Furman U.; Larry Small, Los Angeles
Pierce G; Donald B. Small, Colby G; Andy Sterrett, Denison U.; J. Suck, Essen, FRG; Alvin
Swimmer, Arizona State U.; Richard Trout, Rutgers U.; George Tsintsifas, Thessaloniki, Greece;
Thomas Tucker, Colgate U.; Barbara Turner, California State U., Long Beach; Floyd Vest, U. of
North Texas; Michelle Wachs, U. of Miami, Coral Gables; Bert Waits, Ohio State U.; William T.
Watkins, Pan American U.; Joan W. Weiss, Fairfield U.; Ronald Wenger, U. of Delaware; John
Williams, U. of Hartford; Stephen Willson, Iowa State U.; Lynn Wilson, AT&T Bell Laboratories;
Jeff Witmer, Oberlin G; John W. Wrench, Jr., Frederick, MD; Paul Zorn, St. Olaf G

378 THE COLLEGE MATHEMATICS JOURNAL

This content downloaded from 148.204.78.237 on Thu, 24 May 2018 16:22:26 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms