Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Accounting for Income Tax-problems

by Alfredo Garcia
February 22, 2005

[Send a comment to Alfredo Garcia | Print View]

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

a1.Which of the following creates a permanent difference between financial income and
taxable income?
   a.Interest received on municipal bonds
   b.Completed contract method of recognizing construction revenue
   c.Unearned rent revenue
   d.Accelerated cost recovery on plant and equipment

b2.Which of the following creates a temporary difference between financial and taxable
income?
   a.Interest on municipal bonds
   b.Accelerated cost recovery on plant and equipment
   c.Fines from violation of law
   d.Premiums paid for officer's life insurance (company is beneficiary)

c3.The purpose of an interperiod income tax allocation is to


   a.allow reporting entities to fully utilize tax losses carried forward from a previous year.
   b.allow reporting entities whose tax liabilities vary significantly from year to year to
smooth payments to taxing agencies.
   c.recognize an asset or liability for the tax consequences of temporary differences that
exist at the balance sheet date.
   d.amortize the deferred tax liability shown on the balance sheet.

d4.The result of interperiod income tax allocation is that


   a.wide fluctuations in a company's tax liability payments are eliminated.
   b.tax expense shown in the income statement is equal to the deferred taxes shown on
the balance sheet.
   c.tax liability shown in the balance sheet is equal to the deferred taxes shown on the
previous year's balance sheet plus the income tax expense shown on the income
statement.
   d.tax expense shown on the income statement is equal to income taxes payable for the
current year plus or minus the change in the deferred tax asset or liability balances for the
year.

a5.Which of the following temporary differences ordinarily creates a deferred tax asset?
   a.Accrued warranty costs
   b.Depreciation
   c.Installment sales
   d.Amortization of goodwill
c6.An example of a "deductible temporary difference" occurs when
   a. the installment sales method is used for tax purposes, but the accrual method of
recognizing sales revenue is used for financial reporting purposes.
   b. accelerated depreciation is used for tax purposes but straight line depreciation is used
for accounting purposes.
   c. warranty expenses are recognized on the accrual basis for financial reporting
purposes but recognized as the warranty conditions are met for tax purposes.
d. the completed-contract method of recognizing construction revenue is used for tax
purposes, but the percentage-of-completion method is used for financial reporting
purposes.

a7.Which of the following situations would require interperiod income tax


allocation procedures?
   a.A temporary difference exists because the tax basis of capital equipment is less than
its reported amount in the financial statements.
   b.Proceeds from an insurance policy on capital equipment lost in a fire exceed the book
value of the equipment.
   c.Last period¡¦s ending inventory was understated causing both net income and income
tax expense to be understated.
   d.Nontaxable interest payments are received on municipal bonds.

d8.An item that would create a permanent difference in pretax financial and taxable
incomes would be
a.using accelerated depreciation for tax purposes and straight-line
depreciation for book purposes.
   b.purchasing equipment previously leased with an operating lease in prior years.
   c.using the percentage-of-completion method on long-term construction contracts.
   d.paying fines for violation of laws.

d9.Which of the following is the most likely item to result in a deferred tax asset?
   a. Using accelerated depreciation for tax purposes but straight line depreciation for
accounting purposes
   b. Using the completed-contract method of recognizing construction revenue tax
purposes, but using percentage-of-completion method for financial reporting purposes
   c. Prepaid expenses
   d. Unearned revenues

a10.Which of the following arguments is supportive of allocation of income taxes?


   a.Future predictions of net income are enhanced when income taxes are allocated.
   b.Income tax expense computed under interperiod tax allocation is a better predictor of
future cash flows than income taxes actually paid.
   c.Income tax is not an expense; it is a sharing of profits with government.
   d.Income tax expense based on actual payments is more understandable to users than
allocated income taxes.

d11.Which of the following temporary differences ordinarily results in a deferred tax


liability?
   a.Accrued warranty costs
   b.Subscription revenue received in advance
   c.Unrealized losses on marketable securities
   d.Depreciation

d12.When enacted tax rates change, the asset and liability method of interperiod tax
allocation recognizes the rate change as
   a.a cumulative effect adjustment.
   b.an adjustment to be netted against the current income tax expense.
   c.a separate charge to the current year's net income.
   d.a separate charge or benefit to income tax expense.

c13.Recognizing tax benefits in a loss year due to a loss carryforward requires


   a.only a footnote disclosure.
   b.creating a new carryforward for the next year.
   c.creating a deferred tax asset.
   d.creating a deferred tax liability.

a14.A company would most likely choose the carryforward option for a net
operating loss if the company expected
   a.higher tax rates in the future compared to the past.
   b.lower tax rates in the future compared to the past.
   c.lower earnings in the future compared to the past.
   d.higher earnings in the future compared to the past.

a15.All of the following can result in a temporary difference between pretax financial
income and taxable income except for
   a.payment of premiums for life insurance.
   b.depreciation expense.
   c.contingent liabilities.
   d.product warranty costs.

c16.Which of the following items results in a temporary difference deductible amount for
a given year?
   a.Premiums on officer's life insurance (company is beneficiary)
   b.Premiums on officer's life insurance (officer is beneficiary)
   c.Vacation pay accrual
   d.Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes; straight-line for financial reporting
purposes

d17.Which of the following items results in a temporary difference taxable amount for a
given year?
   a.Premiums on officer's life insurance (company is beneficiary)
   b.Premiums on officer's life insurance (officer is beneficiary)
   c.Vacation pay accrual
   d.Accelerated depreciation for tax purposes; straight-line for financial reporting
purposes

d18.Alpha Company reported net incomes in 2001 and 2002 before sustaining a
significant operating loss in 2003. All of the 2003 loss can be carried back against the
income of 2001 and 2002 for purposes of determining the company¡¦s 2003 income tax
liability. How should the carryback be presented in the company¡¦s 2003 financial
statements?
   a.As an extraordinary item in the income statement
   b.As a revenue from operations in the income statement
   c.As the correction of an error in the retained earnings statement
   d.As a reduction in the operating loss on the income statement for the year 2003

a19.Intraperiod income tax allocation arises because


   a.items included in the determination of taxable income may be presented in different
sections of the financial statements.
   b.income taxes must be allocated between current and future periods.
   c.certain revenues and expenses appear in the financial statements either before or after
they are included in taxable income.
   d.certain revenues and expenses appear in the financial statements but are excluded
from taxable income.

b20.Assuming no prior period adjustments, would the following allocations affect net
income?
         Interperiod Tax   Intraperiod Income
         Tax Allocation     Tax Allocation
   a.      Yes   Yes
   b.      Yes   No
   c.      No      Yes
   d.      No      No

c21.Which of the following statements is not correct?


   a.All current deferred tax liabilities and assets shall be offset and presented as a single
amount on the balance sheet.
   b.Deferred tax assets related to carryforwards shall be classified as current or
noncurrent on the balance sheet based on their expected date of reversal.
   c.All current and noncurrent deferred tax assets shall be offset and presented as a single
amount on the balance sheet.
   d.Deferred tax liabilities and assets shall be classified as current or nocurrent on the
balance sheet based on the classification of the asset or liability giving rise to the deferred
tax item.

b22.A deferred tax liability arising from the use of an accelerated method of depreciation
for tax purposes and the straight-line method for financial
reporting purposes would be classified on the balance sheet as
   a.a current liability.
   b.a noncurrent liability.
   c.a current liability for the portion of the temporary difference reversing within a year
and a noncurrent liability for the remainder.
   d.an offset to the accumulated depreciation reported on the balance sheet.

c23.International accounting standards currently are moving toward the


   a.no-deferral approach.
   b.partial recognition approach.
   c.comprehensive recognition approach.
   d.discounted comprehensive recognition approach.

b24.If all temporary differences entering into the determination of pretax


accountingincome are considered in the computation of deferred taxes and income tax
expense, then
   a.the no-deferral approach is being applied.
   b.the comprehensive recognition approach is being applied.
   c.the partial recognition approach is being applied.
   d.the net-of-tax method is being applied.

d25.The asset-liability method of interperiod tax allocation currently required by U.S.


GAAP is an example of the
   a.discounted comprehensive recognition approach.
   b.no-deferral approach.
   c.partial recognition approach.
   d.comprehensive recognition approach.

b26.Historically, the United Kingdom has recognized only those deferred tax
liabilities expected to ¡§crystallize.¡¨ The term ¡§crystallize¡¨ is most nearly synonymous
with the term
   a.amortized.
   b.realized.
   c.recognized.
   d.liquidated.

a27. On the statement of cash flows using the indirect method, an increase in the deferred
tax liability would be shown as
a.an addition to net income.
b.a deduction from net income.
c.an increase in investing activities.
d.an increase in financing activities.

b28.In 2002, Eric Corporation reported $90,000 net income before income taxes. The
income tax rate for 2002 was 30 percent. Eric had an unused $60,000 net operating loss
carryforward arising in 2001 when the tax rate was 35 percent. The income tax expense
Eric would report for 2002 would be
   a.$6,000.
   b.$9,000.
   c.$10,500.
   d.$27,000.

a29.The Gayle Corporation reported a $66,000 operating loss in 2002. In the preceding
three years, Gayle reported the following income before taxes and paid the indicated
income taxes:
   Year   Income   Taxes   Tax Rate
   1999   $36,000   $10,800   30%
   2000   24,000   8,400   35%
   2001   48,000   16,200   35%
         
The amount of tax benefit to be reported in 2002 arising from the tax carryback
provisions of the current tax code would be
   a.$23,100.
   b.$22,500.
   c.$21,300.
   d.$19,200.

c30.The Indy Company had taxable income of $12,000 during 2002. Indy used
accelerated depreciation for tax purposes ($3,400) and straight line depreciation for
accounting purposes ($2,000). Assuming Indy had no other temporary differences, what
would the company¡¦s pretax accounting income be for 2002?
   a. $1,400
   b. $6,600
   c. $13,400
   d. $17,400

b31.The following information is taken from Blackhawk Corporation's 2002 financial


records:
   Pretax accounting income      $1,500,000
   Excess tax depreciation       (45,000)
   Taxable income      $1,455,000

Assume the taxable temporary difference was created entirely in 2002 and will reverse in
equal net taxable amounts in each of the next three years. If tax rates are 40 percent in
2002, 35 percent in 2003, 35 percent in 2004, and 30 percent in 2005, then the total
deferred tax liability Blackhawk should report on its December 31, 2002, balance sheet is
   a.$13,500.
   b.$15,000.
   c.$15,750.
   d.$18,000.

d32.The following information was taken from Buccaneer Corporation's 2002


income statement:
   Income before income taxes         $   1,500,000
   Income tax expense:
      Current      $564,000
      Deferred       36,000    600,000
      Net income         $   900,000

Buccaneers' first year of operations was 2002. The company has a 30 percent tax rate.
Management decided to use accelerated depreciation for tax purpose and the straight-line
method of depreciation for financial reporting purposes. The amount charged to
depreciation expense in 2002 was $600,000. Assuming no other differences existed
between book income and taxable income, what amount did Buccaneer deduct for
depreciation on its tax return for 2002?
   a.$480,000
   b.$570,000
   c.$600,000
   d.$720,000

a33.Warren Corporation began operations in 1997 and had operating losses of $400,000
in 1998 and $300,000 in 1999. For the year ended December 31, 2000, Warren had a
pretax financial income of $600,000. For 1998 and 1999, assume an enacted tax rate of
30 percent, and for 2000 a 35 percent tax rate. There were no temporary differences in
any of the years. In Warren's 2000 income statement, how much should be reported as
income tax expense?
   a.$0
   b.$30,000
   c.$180,000
   d.$210,000

b34.On December 31, 1999, Alton, Inc., reported a current deferred tax liability of
$140,000 and a noncurrent deferred tax asset of $40,000. At the end of 2000, Alton
reported a current deferred tax liability of $100,000, and a noncurrent deferred tax
liability of $44,000. The deferred tax expense for 2000 is
   a.$144,000.
   b.$44,000.
   c.$36,000.
   d.$4,000.

d35.Eden Company had pretax accounting income of $24,000 during 2002. Eden's only
temporary difference for 2002 relates to a sale made in 2000 and recognized for
accounting purposes at that time. However, Eden uses the installment sales method of
revenue recognition for tax purposes. During 2002 Eden collected a receivable from the
2000 sale which resulted in $6,000 of income under the installment sales method. Eden's
taxable income for 2002 would be
   a.$6,000.
   b.$18,000.
   c.$24,000.
   d.$30,000.
c36.Begal Corporation paid $20,000 in January of 2002 for premiums on a two-year life
insurance policy which names the company as the beneficiary. Additionally, Begal
Corporation's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 revealed the
company paid $105,000 in taxes during the year and also accrued estimated losses on
disposal of unused plant facilities of $200,000. Assuming these facilities were sold in
February of 2003 (at which time a $200,000 loss was recognized for tax purposes) and
that Begal's tax rate is 30 percent for both 2002 and 2003, what amount should Begal
report as asset for net deferred income taxes on its 2002 balance sheet?
   a.$54,000
   b.$57,000
   c.$60,000
   d.$66,000

c37.Dodger Corporation reported a loss for both financial reporting purposes and tax
reporting purposes of $231,000 in 2002. For financial reporting purposes, Dodger
reported income before taxes for years 1999-2001 as listed below:
   1999      $   66,000
   2000         99,000
   2001         132,000

Assuming Dodger's tax rate is 30 percent in all periods, and that the company uses the
carryback provisions, what amount should appear in Dodger's statements for financial
reporting purposes as a net loss in 2002?
   a.$0
   b.$69,300
   c.$161,700
   d.$234,300

b38.Analysis of the assets and liabilities of Marie Corp. on December 31, 2002, disclosed
assets with a tax basis of $1,000,000 and a book basis of $1,300,000. There was no
difference in the liability basis. The difference in asset basis arose from temporary
differences that would reverse in the following years:
   2003      $80,000
   2004      70,000
   2005      72,000
   2006      40,000
   2007      38,000

The enacted tax rates are 30 percent for the years 2002-2005 and 35 percent for 2006-
2009. The total deferred tax liability on December 31, 2002, should be
   a.$105,000.
   b.$93,900.
   c.$90,000.
   d.$69,000.
c39.Schaeffer Products, Inc., reported an excess of warranty expense over
warranty deductions of $72,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. This temporary
difference will reverse in equal amounts over the years 2003 to 2005. The enacted tax
rates are as follows:
   2002   40%
   2003   35%
   2004   30%
   2005   25%

The reporting for this temporary difference at December 31, 2002, would be
   a.a deferred tax liability of $28,800.
   b.a deferred tax asset of $28,800.
   c.a current deferred tax liability of $8,400 and a noncurrent deferred tax liability of
$13,200.
   d.a current deferred tax asset of $8,400 and a noncurrent deferred tax asset of $13,200.

d40.In 2003, The Worf Company, reported pretax financial income of $500,000. Included
in that pretax financial income was $90,000 of nontaxable life insurance proceeds
received as a result of the death of an officer; $120,000 of warranty expenses accrued but
unpaid as of December 31, 2003; and $20,000 of life insurance premiums for a policy for
an officer. Assuming that no income taxes were previously paid during the year and
assuming an income tax rate of 40 percent, the amount of income taxes payable on
December 31, 2003, would be
   a.$180,000.
   b.$200,000.
   c.$212,000.
   d.$220,000.

b41.Fieldcrest Company, newly formed on January 1, 2002, prepared a temporary


difference reversal schedule at the end of 2003 that disclosed the following taxable
income (loss) amounts before application of the carryback/carryforward rules:
   2002      $    64,000
   2003          (128,000)
   2004          (12,000)
   2005          80,000
   2006          20,000
      
The enacted tax rate for all years was 30 percent. Using the provisions of FASB
Statement No. 109, the total noncurrent deferred tax liability on December 31, 2003, was
   a.$0.
   b.$7,200.
   c.$10,800.
   d.$30,000.

b42.For three consecutive years, 2000-2002, Twins Corporation has reported


income before taxes of $100,000 for both financial reporting purposes and tax reporting
purposes. During this time, Twins income tax rates were as follows:
   2000      20%
   2001      25%
   2002      30%

In 2003, Twins¡¦ tax rate changed to 35 percent. Also in 2003, the company reported a
loss for both financial reporting and tax reporting purposes of $100,000. Assuming the
company uses the carryback provisions, the amount Twins¡¦ should report as an income
tax refund receivable in 2003 is
   a.$20,000.
   b.$25,000.
   c.$30,000.
   d.$35,000.

c43.Viking Corporation reported depreciation of $250,000 on its 2002 tax return.


However, in its 2002 income statement, Viking reported depreciation of $100,000. The
difference in depreciation is a temporary difference that will reverse over time. Assuming
Viking's tax rate is constant at 30 percent, what amount should be added to the deferred
income tax liability in Viking's December 31, 2002, balance sheet?
   a.$30,000
   b.$37,500
   c.$45,000
   d.$75,000

b44.Cowboy Corporation reported depreciation of $450,000 on its 2002 tax return.


However, in its 2002 income statement, Cowboy reported depreciation of $300,000--as
well as $30,000 interest revenue on tax-free bonds. The difference in depreciation is only
a temporary difference, and it will reverse equally over the next three years. Cowboy's
enacted income tax rates are as follows:
   2002      35%
   2003      30%
   2004      25%
   2005      20%
         
What amount should be included in the deferred income tax liability in Cowboy's
December 31, 2002, balance sheet?
   a.$30,000
   b.$37,500
   c.$45,000
   d.$52,500

c45.The books of the Tracker Company for the year ended December 31, 2002,
showed pretax income of $360,000. In computing the taxable income for federal income
tax purposes, the following timing differences were taken into account:
   Depreciation deducted for tax purposes in excess
   of depreciation recorded on the books      $16,000
   Income from installment sale reportable for tax
   purposes in excess of income recognized on
   the books 12,000
         
What should Tracker record as its current federal income tax liability at December 31,
2002, assuming a corporate income tax rate of 30 percent?
   a.$99,600
   b.$103,200
   c.$106,800
   d.$108,000

c46.Frey Corporation's income statement for the year ended December 31, 2002, shows
pretax income of $1,000,000. The following items are treated differently on the tax return
and in the accounting records:

                Tax Accounting


Return Records
   Rent income      $ 70,000   $120,000
   Depreciation expense    280,000    220,000
   Premiums on officers'
life insurance    --    90,000

Assume that Frey's tax rate for 2002 is 30 percent. What is the amount of income tax
payable for 2002?
   a.$360,000
   b.$320,000
   c.$294,000
   d.$267,000

   
c47.Inventive Corporation¡¦s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2002,
shows pretax income of $300,000. The following items are treated differently on the tax
return and in the accounting records:

                Tax Accounting


Return Records
   Warranty expense   $170,000   $185,500
   Depreciation expense    150,000    100,000
   Premiums on officers'
life insurance     --    60,000

Assume that Inventive¡¦s tax rate for 2002 is 40 percent. What is the current portion of
Inventive's total income tax expense for 2002?
   a.$106,200
   b.$120,200
   c.$130,200
   d.$144,200

The following information relates to questions 48-50:


   
The Hart Company paid $400,000 in income taxes for the year ended December 31,
2002. Of these taxes, $23,000 related to an extraordinary gain that was taxed at 25%.
The company discontinued one of its business segments during 2002 and realized a tax
savings of $55,000 from the loss on disposition of the segment. The loss was treated for
tax purposes as an ordinary loss and was deducted from ordinary income that was taxed
at 40%. Included in the $400,000 tax payment was $12,000 resulting from a gain on the
sale of equipment. The tax rate on the gain was 25%. All other income items were from
normal operations and were taxed at 40%.

c48.Income from continuing operations for Hart Company for the year 2002 was
   a.$1,000,000.
   b.$1,080,000.
   c.$1,098,000.
   d.$1,050,000.

a49.Income taxes from continuing operations for Hart Company for the year 2002 was
   a.$432,000.
   b.$420,000.
   c.$400,000.
   d.$455,000.

b50.Operating income for Hart Company for the year 2002 was
   a.$1,000,000.
   b.$1,050,000.
   C.$1,098,000.
   d.$1,080,000.

c51.During a year, Great Northern Company reported income tax expense of


$200,000. The amount of taxes currently payable remained unchanged from the
beginning to the end of the year. The deferred tax liability classified as noncurrent that
resulted from the use of MACRS for tax purposes and straight-line depreciation for
financial reporting purposes, increased from $40,000 at the beginning of the year to
$44,000 at the end of the year. How much cash was paid for income taxes during for the
year?
   a.$156,000
   b.$160,000
   c.$196,000
   d.$206,000

a52.For the current year, Northern Pacific Company reported income tax expense   of
$45,000. Income taxes payable at the end of the prior year were $20,000 and at the end of
the current year were $27,000. The deferred tax liability classified as noncurrent that
resulted from the use of MACRS for tax purposes and straight-line depreciation for
financial reporting purposes increased from $18,000 at the beginning of the current year
to $23,000 at the end of the current year. How much cash was paid for income taxes
during the year?
   a.$33,000
   b.$45,000
   c.$38,000
   d.$47,000
            
a53.For the current year, Santa Fe Company reported income tax expense
of $195,000. Income taxes payable at the end of the prior year were $125,000 and at the
end of the current year were $130,000. The deferred tax liability classified as noncurrent
that resulted from the use of MACRS for tax purposes and straight-line depreciation for
financial reporting purposes increased from $120,000 at the beginning of the current year
to $123,000 at the end of the current year. How much cash was paid for income taxes
during the year?
   a.$187,000
   b.$197,000
   c.$195,000
   d.$190,000      

a54.For the current year, Northern Pacific Company reported income tax expense   of
$11,000. Income taxes payable at the end of the prior year were $9,000 and at the end of
the current year were $10,000. The deferred tax liability classified as noncurrent that
resulted from the use of MACRS for tax purposes and straight-line depreciation for
financial reporting purposes increased from $11,000 at the beginning of the current year
to $13,000 at the end of the current year. How much cash was paid for income taxes
during the year?
   a. $8,000
   b.$10,000
   c.$11,000
   d. $9,000

PROBLEMS

Problem 1
Garrison Designs, Inc., a corporation organized on January 1, 1993, reported the
following incomes (losses) for the ten-year period, 1993-2002:
            Year   Income (Loss)   Income Tax Rate   Income Tax Paid
   1993 16,000   50%   $ 8,000
   1994    (40,000)   50   0
   1995    16,000   48   7,680
   1996    24,000   48   11,520
   1997    (32,000)   45   0
   1998    16,000   42   6,720
   1999    32,000   42   13,440
   2000    64,000   34   21,760
   2001    80,000   34   27,200
   2002    (16,000)   30   0

Applying the carryback provisions in the tax law, compute the net amount of taxes paid
(amounts paid less refunds) for the ten-year period ending December 31, 2002.

Solution 1
LO3
Income taxes paid through December 31, 1998, net to zero because the $40,000 net
operating loss in 1994 and the $32,000 net operating loss in 1997 are applied against the
entire income earned for the years 1993, 1995, 1996, and 1998.

Net taxes paid between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2002, were:

      Year   Net Taxes Paid


      1999    $13,440
      2000 (after applying 2002 loss)   16,320
      2001   27,200
      2002    --

Total income taxes actually paid (1993 - 2002)   $56,960

Problem 2
The following differences between financial and taxable income were reported by Dider
Corporation for the current year.
   (a)Excess of tax depreciation over book depreciation      $60,000
   (b)Interest revenue on municipal bonds      9,000
   (c)Excess of estimated warranty expense over actual
         expenditures      54,000
   (d)Unearned rent received      12,000
   (e)Fines paid      30,000
   (f)Excess of income reported under percentage-of-completion
      accounting for financial reporting over completed-contract
      accounting used for tax reporting   45,000
   (g)Interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase tax-exempt
         securities      3,000
(h)Unrealized losses on marketable securities recognized for
         financial reporting      18,000

Assume that Dider Corporation had pretax accounting income [before considering items
(a) through (h)] of $900,000 for the current year. Compute the taxable income for the
current year.

Solution 2
LO2
Pretax financial income       $ 900,000
Add (deduct) permanent differences:
      (b)   Tax-exempt interest       (9,000)
      (e)   Fines paid        30,000
      (g)   Interest expense on funds used to purchase tax-exemptsecurities 3,000
      Subtotal       $ 924,000

Add (deduct) timing differences:


      (a)Excess of tax over book depreciation    (60,000)
      (c)Excess of warranty expense over actual expenditures       54,000
      (d)Unearned rent received       12,000
      (f)Excess of percentage-of-completion income over completed
         contract income       (45,000)
      (h)Unrealized loss on marketable securities 18,000
         Taxable income       $ 903,000

Problem 3
Walsh Services computed pretax financial income of $220,000 for its first year of
operations ended December 31, 2002. In preparing the income tax return for the year, the
tax accountant determined the following differences between 2002 financial income and
taxable income.

(1)   Nondeductible expenses       $40,000


(2)   Nontaxable revenues       14,000
(3)   Temporary difference--Installment sales reported in financial
   income but not in taxable income       70,000

The temporary difference is expected to reverse in the following pattern.


         2003         $14,000
         2004         32,000
         2005         24,000
             $70,000

The enacted tax rates for this year and the next three years are as follows:
         2002         40%
         2003         35%
         2004         32%
         2005         30%

Use the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109.

(1)   Prepare a schedule showing the reversal of the temporary differences and the
computation of income taxes payable and deferred tax assets or liabilities as of December
31, 2002.
(2)   Prepare journal entries to record income taxes payable and deferred income taxes.
(3)   Prepare the income statement for Walsh Services beginning with ¡§Income from
continuing operations before income taxes¡¨ for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Solution 3
LO4
(1)                     Reversal Years
                   2002 2003    2004 2005
      Pretax financial income       $220,000
      Nondeductible expense   40,000
      Nontaxable revenue    (14,000)
      Taxable financial income   $246,000
      Temporary difference:
      Gross profit on installment sales    (70,000)    $14,000    $32,000     $24,000
      Taxable income $   176,000     $14,000    $32,000    $24,000
      Enacted tax rate        40%    35%    32%     30%
      Income taxes payable   $    70,400
      Deferred tax liability:
         Current             $ 4,900
         Noncurrent              $10,240    $ 7,200

(2)   2002 Journal Entries:


         Income Tax Expense--Current   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K 70,400
            Income Taxes Payable   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K..       70,400

         Income Tax Expense--Deferred   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K. 22,340


            Deferred Tax Liability--Current   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K.       4,900
            Deferred Tax Liability--Noncurrent   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K       17,440

(3)   2002 Income Statement Presentation:


         Income from continuing operations before
         income taxes         $220,000
         Less income taxes:
            Current provision       $ 70,400
            Deferred provision       22,340
                            92,740
         Income from continuing operations         $127,260

Problem 4
Millcroft Inc. computed a pretax financial income of $40,000 for the first year of its
operations ended December 31, 2002. Analysis of the tax and book basis of its liabilities
disclosed $360,000 in unearned rent revenue on the books that had been recognized as
taxable income in 2002 when the cash was received.

The unearned rent is expected to be recognized on the books in the following pattern.
      2003   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K..$ 90,000
      2004   160,000
      2005   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K.. 70,000
      2006   ¡K¡K¡K¡K.¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K 40,000
          $360,000

The enacted tax rates for this year and the next four years are as follows:
      2002      40%
      2003      36%
      2004      33%
      2005      30%
      2006      32%

Use the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109.

(1)   Prepare a schedule showing the reversal of the temporary difference and the
computation of income taxes payable and deferred tax assets or liabilities as of December
31, 2002.(2)   Prepare journal entries to record income taxes payable and deferred income
taxes.
(3)   Prepare the income statement for Millcroft beginning with ¡§Income from
continuing operations before income taxes¡¨ for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Solution 4
LO4
(1)                        Reversal Years
                      2002     2003     2004     2005     2006
Taxable financial income    $ 40,000    $ 0    $ 0 $    0     $ 0
Temporary differences:
Unearned rent revenue    360,000
      Rent revenue earned     0    (90,000)    (160,000)    (70,000)    (40,000)
Taxable income (loss)    $ 400,000    $(90,000)    $(160,000)    $(70,000)    $(40,000)
Loss carryback:
      2003 carryback    (90,000)    90,000
      2004 carryback    (160,000)       160,000
      2005 carryback (70,000)            70,000
   Net taxable (deductible)
    amount $ 80,000     $ 0    $ 0    $ 0   $(40,000)
Enacted tax rate   40%    36%   30%   30%   32%

Income taxes payable (40% x $400,000)      $160,000


Deferred tax asset:
         Current (40% x $90,000)      36,000
         Noncurrent (40% x $160,000)         64,000

(2)   2002 Journal Entries:


         Income Tax Expense--Current      160,000
            Income Taxes Payable         160,000

         Deferred Tax Asset--Current      36,000


         Deferred Tax Asset--Noncurrent      92,000
            Income Tax Benefit--Deferred         128,000

(3)   2002 Income Statement Presentation:


      Income from continuing operations before
      income taxes         $40,000
      Less income taxes:
         Current provision      $160,000
         Deferred benefit       (128,000)    32,000
      Income from continuing operations         $ 8,000

Problem 5
Radford Appliances computed a pretax financial loss of $60,000 for the first year of its
operations ended December 31, 2002. Analysis of the tax and book basis of its liabilities
disclosed $80,000 in accrued warranty expenses on the books that had not been
deductible from taxable income in 2002, but would be deductible in future years when
the warranty expenses were paid.

The future warranty payments are expected to occur in the following pattern.
      2003      $14,000
      2004      36,000
      2005      18,000
      2006       12,000
               $80,000

The enacted tax rates for this year and the next four years are as follows:
      2002      40%
      2003      35%
      2004      32%
      2005      30%
      2006      30%

Use the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109.

(1)   Prepare a schedule showing the reversal of the temporary difference and the
computation of income taxes payable and deferred tax assets or liabilities as of December
31, 2002.
(2)   Prepare journal entries to record income taxes payable and deferred income taxes.
(3)   Prepare the income statement for Radford beginning with "Income from continuing
operations before income taxes" for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Solution 5
LO4
(1)                           Reversal Years
                      2002     2003     2004     2005     2006
Taxable financial income   $(60,000)   $ 0    $ 0    $ 0    $ 0
Temporary differences:
Estimated warranty
      payment in future years 80,000
Deductible amount--
      warranty payments        (14,000)    (36,000)    (18,000)    (12,000)
Taxable income (loss) $ 20,000     $(14,000)    $(36,000)    $(18,000)    $(12,000)

Loss carryback:
2003 carryback (14,000)    14,000
2004 carryback (6,000)        6,000       
Net taxable (deductible
    amount) $ 0     $ 0    $(30,000)    $(18,000)    $(12,000)
Enacted tax rate 40%     35%    32%    30%    30%

Income taxes payable (40% x $20,000)      $8,000


Deferred tax asset:
      Current (40% x $14,000)      5,600
      Noncurrent (40% x $6,000)      2,400

(2)   2002 Journal Entries


      Income Tax Expense--Current      8,000
         Income Taxes Payable         8,000
      Deferred Tax Asset--Current      5,600
      Deferred Tax Asset--Noncurrent      2,400
         Income Tax Benefit--Deferred         8,000

(3)   2002 Income Statement Presentation:


      Loss from continuing operations before
      income taxes         $(60,000)
      Less income taxes:
         Current provision       $8,000
         Deferred benefit       (8,000) 0
      Loss from continuing operations         $(60,000)

Problem 6
Seta Associates computed a pretax financial income of $280,000 for the first year of its
operations ended December 31, 2002. Included in financial income was $20,000 of
nondeductible expense and $70,000 gross profit on installment sales that was deferred for
tax purposes until the installments were collected.
The temporary differences are expected to reverse in the following pattern.

         Gross Profit on Collections


         2003         $20,000
         2004       30,000
         2005          20,000
                     $70,000

The enacted tax rates for this year and the next three years are as follows:
         2002         40%
         2003         35%
         2004         32%
         2005         30%

(1)   Prepare a schedule showing the reversal of the temporary differences and the
computation of income taxes payable and deferred tax assets or liabilities as of December
31, 2002.

(2)   Prepare journal entries to record income taxes payable and deferred income taxes.

(3)   Prepare the income statement for Seta beginning with "Income from continuing
operations before income taxes" for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Solution 6
LO4
(1)                   Reversal Years
                2002    2003    2004    2005
Pretax financial income (loss)   $280,000
Nondeductible expense    20,000
Taxable financial income (loss)   $300,000
Temporary difference:
Gross profit on installment sales   (70,000)
Taxable amount--collections       $20,000   $30,000   $20,000
Taxable income (loss)    $230,000   $20,000   $30,000   $20,000

Enacted tax rate      40%   35%   32%   30%


Income taxes payable (40% x $230,000)      $92,000
Deferred tax liability:
Current (35% x $20,000)      7,000
Noncurrent (32% x $30,000) + (30% x 20,000)      15,600

Under the provisions of the proposed modification to FASB Statement No. 109, the
classification of the deferred tax liability into current and noncurrent portions follows the
classification of the underlying installment receivable.

(2)   2002 Journal Entries


      Income Tax Expense--Current      92,000
         Income Taxes Payable         92,000

      Income Tax Expense--Deferred      22,600


         Deferred Tax Liability--Current         7,000
         Deferred Tax Liability--Noncurrent         15,600

(3) 2002 Income Statement Presentation:


      Income from continuing operations before income taxes         $280,000
      Less income taxes:
         Current provision      $92,000
         Deferred provision       22,600    114,600
      Income from continuing operations         $165,400

Problem 7
Cardinal Industries computed a pretax financial income of $118,500 for the first year of
its operations ended December 31, 2002. Cardinal uses an accelerated cost recovery
method on its tax return, and straight-line depreciation on its books.

The difference between the tax and book deduction for depreciation over the five-year
life of the assets acquired in 1999 are as follows:
      2002       $(24,000)
      2003       (39,000)
      2004       (9,000)
      2005   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K 30,000
      2006   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K 42,000
          $ 0

The enacted tax rates for this year and the next four years are as follows:
      2002      40%
      2003      38%
      2004      36%
      2005      35%
      2006      32%

Use the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109 and assume that it is more likely than not
that income will be sufficient in all future years to realize any deductible amounts.

(1)   Prepare a schedule showing the pattern of depreciation differences, the computation


of income taxes payable, and deferred tax assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2002.
(2)   Prepare journal entries to record income taxes payable and deferred income taxes.
(3)   Prepare the income statement for Cardinal Industries beginning with "Income from
continuing operations before income taxes" for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Solution 7
LO4
(1)                        Reversal Years
                    2002    2003 2004    2005    2006
Taxable financial income    $118,500
Temporary difference
    between tax and book
    depreciation    (24,000)    $(39,000)   $(9,000)   $30,000   $42,000
Taxable income (loss)    $ 94,500     $(39,000)   $(9,000)   $30,000   $42,000
Enacted tax rate    40%   38%   36%    35%    32%

Income taxes payable ($94,500 x 40%)      $37,800


Deferred tax asset:
    Noncurrent (38% x $39,000) + (36% x $9,000)      18,060
Deferred tax liability:
Noncurrent (35% x $30,000) + (32% x $42,000)      23,940

Under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109, the classification of the deferred tax
asset and liability as noncurrent follows the classification of the underlying depreciable
asset.

The deferred tax asset and liability can be offset and reported as a noncurrent deferred tax
liability totaling $5,880 ($23,940 - $18,060).

(2)   2002 Journal Entries


      Income Tax Expense--Current      37,800
         Income Taxes Payable         37,800

      Income Tax Expense--Deferred      5,880


         Deferred Tax Liability--Noncurrent         5,880

(3)   2002 Income Statement Presentation:


      Income from continuing operations before income taxes         $118,500
      Less income taxes:
         Current provision      $37,800
         Deferred provision       5,880    43,680
      Income from continuing operations          $ 74,820

Problem 8
Halverson Company reported taxable income of $60,000 for 2002, its first year of
operations. This amount reflects temporary differences between financial and taxable
income that are scheduled to reverse in subsequent years as shown below. As of
December 31, 2002, the enacted tax rate for 2002 and future years was 40 percent.

                  Temporary Difference Reversals


                        Taxable (Deductible)
                  Year       Amounts
                  2003         $(24,000)
                  2004           27,000
                  2005           (36,000)
                  2006           (18,000)
                  2007          101,000

Use the provisions of FASB Statement No. 109 and assume that it is more likely than not
that income will be sufficient in all future years to realize any deductible amounts. Also
assume that all the temporary differences relate to noncurrent items.

Compute the amount of the deferred tax assets and/or liabilities that would be reported on
Halverson's balance sheet as of December 31, 2002.

Solution 8
LO2
Since future tax rates are unchanging and since FASB Statement No. 109 classifies
deferred tax assets and liabilities according to the classification of the underlying items
and not the expected time of reversal, no scheduling is necessary in this case.

Noncurrent deferred tax liability: ($50,000 x 0.40) = $20,000

Problem 9
Assume Ernst Corporation has the following income components on its income
statement. Amounts are before tax.
   Income from continuing operations    $40,000
   Gain on disposal of business segment    20,000
   Extraordinary gain on early extinguishment of debt    24,000
   Extraordinary loss on property loss    (34,000)
   Cumulative effect of change in depreciation method    (12,000)
   Total income before considering income taxes    38,000

Assume further that the tax department has applied the current tax regulations and rates to
Ernst¡¦s various income categories and computed the following tax information using the
¡§with and without¡¨ concept required for intraperiod tax allocation:

Tax on total income ($38,000)    $14,400


Tax on income from continuing operations ($40,000)    16,200
Tax on total income before considering all irregular and
extraordinary losses    29,000

The tax department also has computed the following incremental tax benefits and
expenses on each individual gain or loss component:

Incremental tax expense--gain components:


      Gain on disposal       $6,500
      Extraordinary gain    6,700
Incremental tax benefit--loss components:
      Extraordinary loss    10,500
      Cumulative effect    4,600

1.   Compute the total tax to be allocated to all income components after income from
continuing operations, the total tax benefit allocated to the two loss categories, and the
total tax expense allocated to the two gain categories.

2.   Allocate the total tax benefit and tax expense from (1) to the separate gain and loss
components.

Solution 9
LO8
(1)      Tax on income from continuing operations    $16,200
      Less: Tax on total income¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K... 14,400
      Total tax benefit to be allocated¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K.. $ 1,800

      Tax on total income before considering all


      irregular and extraordinary losses¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K. $29,000
      Less: Tax on total income   ¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K¡K.. 14,400
      Tax benefit from loss categories    $14,600

      Total tax benefit from loss categories    $14,600


      Less: Total tax benefit to be allocated    1,800
      Tax expense allocated to gain categories    $12,800

(2)      Allocation to gain categories:


      Total tax expense to allocate to gains    $12,800
      Incremental tax--Gain on disposal    $ 6,500
      Incremental tax--Extraordinary gain     6,700
      Total expense on gains    $13,200
      
      Tax expense allocated to gain on disposal
      [($6,500 „i $13,200) x $12,800]    $ 6,303
      Tax expense allocated to extraordinary gain
      [($6,700 „i $13,200) x $12,800]    6,497
                   $12,800
      Allocation to loss categories:
      Total tax benefit allocated to losses    $(14,600)
      Incremental tax benefit--Extraordinary loss    $10,500
      Incremental tax benefit--Cumulative effect    4,600
      Total tax benefit from losses    $15,100

      Tax benefit allocated to extraordinary loss


      [($10,500 „i $15,100) x ($14,600)]    $(10,152)
      Tax benefit allocated to cumulative effect
      [($4,600 „i $15,100) x ($14,600)]    (4,448)
      Total tax benefit allocated to all losses    $(14,600)

You might also like