Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Falls and Depression in Older People PDF
Falls and Depression in Older People PDF
net/publication/8380231
CITATIONS READS
57 510
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Flexibility of muscular synergies in anticipatory postural adjustments: from healthy subject to elderly patients with potential cognitive impairment View project
Alzheimer's Disease and Implicit Motor Learning (Maladie d'Alzheimer et Apprentissage Moteur Implicite - MAAMI) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by France Mourey on 25 February 2015.
Table 4. Relationship between depression and MMT, walking speed, falls, associated diseases and MMSE
The NDF group was composed of patients who presented a GDS of ^10, and the DF
group was composed of patients with a GDS of 1 10.
pared to the NDF group (12.8 B 5.2 vs. 15.6 B 3.7). The [15], and (2) GDS has been validated in just as well medi-
2 groups were then compared for each part of the MMT cal outpatients as in medical inpatients [16].
(abilities in bed, quality of the sitting position, abilities in Previous studies have suggested that depression is
the standing position, and quality of gait). A significant associated with falls, and particularly with falls which
difference between groups was noted only for abilities in resulted in serious injury [17, 18]. To our knowledge,
the standing position; impairment was more pronounced there are no published data showing the prevalence of
in the DF that in the NDF group (table 5). depression in old hospitalized fallers. Such a high preva-
Walking speed was measured in 41 patients. The lence makes it essential to systematically search for de-
remaining 28 patients did not show enough standing and pression in old hospitalized fallers in order to initiate psy-
walking abilities to allow walking velocity to be measured. chological support and possibly antidepressive drug treat-
Although walking speed was higher in the NDF than in ment.
the DF group (0.56 B 0.56 vs. 0.40 B 0.21 m/s), the dif- A significant difference in the MMT score between the
ference was not statistically significant (table 4). DF and NDF groups was observed, showing that our
depressed patients had lower motor performances than
non-depressed ones. We choose to use the MMT score
Discussion over other validated geriatric assessments of posture and
gait in order to identify subjects at high risk of falling [19–
Our results show a high prevalence of depression 22]. This choice was imposed by the fact that, contrary to
among hospitalized fallers (66.7%). In elderly hospital- other tests, the MMT can assess motor abilities in bed and
ized patients, numerous studies have shown that the prev- in the sitting position in frail older patients who usually
alence of depression was high with a range between 12 show great disabilities in the standing position and walk-
and 45% [15]. To assess depression, a variety of self-rated ing. Then, this test makes it possible to assess the minimal
instruments have been used, and therefore may produce motor and postural abilities which may be dramatically
marker difference in prevalence rates. The GDS has been altered in depressed patients with motor retardation.
widely used and seems to be particularly suitable for the When comparisons were made according to the 4 parts of
diagnosis of depression in hospitalized elderly people the MMT test (abilities in bed, quality of the sitting posi-
because: (1) GDS focuses on the cognitive aspects of tion, abilities in the standing position, and quality of gait),
depressive illness rather than physical symptomatology only postural abilities in the standing position were signif-
References
1 Lilley JM, Arie T, Chilvers CE: Accidents in- 5 Sloman L, Pierrynowski M, Berridge M, Tu- 9 Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O,
volving older people: A review of the literature. pling S, Flowers J: Mood, depressive illness and Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO: Development
Age Ageing 1995;24:346–365. gait patterns. Can J Psychiatry 1987;32:190– and validation of a geriatric screening depres-
2 American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics 193. sion scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr
Society, and American Academy of Orthopedic 6 Buchner DM, Cress ML, Esselman PC, Margh- Res 1983;17:37–49.
Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention: Guideline erita AJ, de Lateur BJ, Campbell AJ, Wagner 10 Yesavage JA: Geriatric depression scale. Psy-
for the prevention of falls in older persons. J EH: Factors associated with changes in gait chopharmacol Bull 1988;24:709–710.
Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:664–672. speed in older adults. J Gerontol 1996;51A: 11 Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHuth PR. Mini-
3 Ruthazer R, Lipsitz LA: Antidepressants and M297–M302. Mental State: A practical method for grading
falls among elderly people in long-term care. 7 Chang RW, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Hughes S: The the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.
Am J Public Health 1993;83:746–749. determinants of walking velocity in the elderly. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
4 Tinetti ME, Baker DI, Garett PA, Gottschalk Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:343–350. 12 Brorsson B, Asberg KH: Katz index of indepen-
M, Koch ML, Horwitz RI: Yale FICSIT: Risk 8 Lemke MR, Wendorff T, Mieth B, Buhl K, dence in ADL. Reliability and validity in short-
factor abatement strategy for fall prevention. J Linneman M: Spatiotemporal gait patterns term care. Scand J Rehabil Med 1984;16:125–
Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:315–320. during over ground locomotion in major de- 132.
pression compared with healthy controls. J
Psychiatr Res 2000;34:277–283.