Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/8380231

Falls and Depression in Older People

Article  in  Gerontology · August 2004


DOI: 10.1159/000079128 · Source: PubMed

CITATIONS READS

57 510

6 authors, including:

France Mourey Philippe D'Athis


University of Burgundy Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon
134 PUBLICATIONS   1,297 CITATIONS    21 PUBLICATIONS   607 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Flexibility of muscular synergies in anticipatory postural adjustments: from healthy subject to elderly patients with potential cognitive impairment View project

Alzheimer's Disease and Implicit Motor Learning (Maladie d'Alzheimer et Apprentissage Moteur Implicite - MAAMI) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by France Mourey on 25 February 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Clinical Section

Received: February 19, 2003


Gerontology 2004;50:303–308
Accepted: September 9, 2003
DOI: 10.1159/000079128

Falls and Depression in Older People


Alin Turcu Sandrine Toubin France Mourey Philippe D’Athis
Patrick Manckoundia Pierre Pfitzenmeyer
Service de Gériatrie, Hôpital de Champmaillot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Dijon, France

Key Words was higher in the non-depressed fallers (NDF) group


Falls W Depression W Posture and gait abnormalities W (GDS ^10) compared to the depressed fallers (DF) group
Older patients (GDS1 10; p ! 0.05). The 2 groups were compared for
each of the 4 items of the MMT: the difference between
the DF and NDF groups was mainly explained by the
Abstract impairment of postural abilities in the standing position.
Background: Depression is one of the most common risk Conclusions: Our results support the idea that depres-
factors for falls, but links between falls and depression sion is associated with postural abnormalities in the
are still unclear. Few studies have examined the relation- standing position, which may predispose to falls. In clini-
ship between depression and gait alteration, which may cal practice, more attention should be given to old fallers
increase the risk of fall. Objective: This study aims to concerning diagnosis and treatment of associated de-
assess a possible relationship between depression, pos- pression.
tural and gait abnormalities, and falls. Methods: We con- Copyright © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

ducted a 1-year prospective study on patients 670 years


who were admitted to a geriatric unit for ‘spontaneous’
unexplained falls. Patients were tested for depression Introduction
using the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
Their motor performances were assessed using the Mini Falls are among the most common and serious prob-
Motor Test (MMT), which is an easy direct-observation lems facing older persons [1]. They usually result from an
test, validated in France, for assessment of frail old peo- interaction between environmental challenges and nu-
ple who present with severe postural and gait impair- merous deficits concerning particularly cognitive, neuro-
ment. This scale is composed of 4 categories of items: muscular or cardiovascular functions. Diverse risk factors
(1) abilities in bed; (2) quality of the sitting position; and situations act on a background of age-related func-
(3) abilities in the standing position, and (4) quality of tional impairment with consequent vulnerability when
gait. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included. Depres- walking.
sion was found in 46 patients (66.7%). The MMT score

© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel Prof. Pierre Pfitzenmeyer


ABC 0304–324X/04/0505–0303$21.00/0 Service de Gériatrie, Hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU
Fax + 41 61 306 12 34 2, Rue Jules Violle
E-Mail karger@karger.ch Accessible online at: FR–21034 Dijon (France)
www.karger.com www.karger.com/ger Tel. +33 3 80 29 39 70, Fax +33 3 80 29 36 21, E-Mail ppfitzenmeyer@chu-dijon.fr
Numerous studies have shown that falls and depres- Table 1. Items of the Mini-Motor Test (MMT)
sion were linked in the old: (1) depression is considered as
1 0
one of the most common risk factors for falls [2]; (2) anti-
depressants may be associated with an increasing inci- In bed
dence rate of falls [3], and (3) subjects who fall are more 1 Able to roll to one side – –
prone to anxiety and depression [4]. 2 Able to rise from lying to sitting position – –
Studies concerning gait and postural abnormalities in Sitting position
depressed older people are scarce. Abnormal gait patterns 3 No retropulsion of the trunk – –
have been observed in depressed patients [5]. Changes in 4 Able to bend trunk forward – –
gait may be an important component of psychomotor 5 Able to rise from a chair – –
retardation which is characterized by impairment of gait Standing position
and stride. In older adults, depressive symptoms were cor- 6 Possible – –
related with gait speed [6, 7]. Moreover, compared to 7 Without assistance (material or human) – –
8 Able to stand on two legs with closed eyes – –
adult controls, depressed subjects showed reduced stride 9 Able to stand on one leg – –
length and double limb support [8]. 10 No retropulsion – –
We conducted a prospective study in older fallers 11 Reactive postural responses – –
admitted to a geriatric acute care unit in order to deter- 12 Protective reactions of upper limbs – –
mine the prevalence of depression in this population, and 13 Stepping reactions forwards – –
14 Stepping reactions backwards – –
to clinically search for a relationship between depression,
posture, and gait abnormalities in these patients. Gait
15 Possible – –
16 Without assistance (material or human) – –
17 Normal heel strike – –
Methods 18 No knee flexion – –
19 No retropulsion – –
All patients aged 70 years and over who were admitted to our 20 Harmonious turn round – –
geriatric hospital unit for ‘spontaneous’ unexplained falls during a Total: –/20
1-year period were included. For these patients, we assessed the pres-
ence of depression, cognitive function, motor performance, blood
pressure, and the number of falls prior to admission. Subjects who
presented with malaise and other direct causes of falls in which envi-
ronmental factors could be held responsible were excluded. Patients
who could not perform the required depression test were also
excluded. and validated in a French study that included 4 geriatric centers
The diagnosis of depression was made using the Geriatric De- (Strasbourg, Saint-Etienne, Marseille, and Dijon) [14]. MMT was
pression Scale (GDS). This scale has 30 items and scores range from created as a 20-item measure (table 1). These 20 items can be catego-
0 to 30. A score of 11 or more characterizes depression with a sensi- rized into 4 parts: (i) abilities in bed; (ii) quality of the sitting posi-
tivity of 65–100% and a specificity of 89–93% [9, 10]. Clinical signs tion; (iii) abilities in the standing position, and (iv) quality of gait.
of major anxiety were systematically noted by the clinician. Three of these 20 items assess the trend to backward disequilibrium
Cognitive performance was investigated using the Mini-Mental because this postural impairment, in our experience, was the main
Status Examination [11]. characteristic of several frail older people [12]. We have called back-
The capacities in daily activities were measured using the Katz ward disequilibrium ‘retropulsion’. Based on clinical observation,
index [12] in grades A, B, C, D, E, F and G, where A is the least and G this test has only 2 levels. When the response to the item is ‘yes’, the
the most dependent grade. Dependence was retained if subjects were score is 1, and when the response is ‘no’, the score is 0. Thus, the
not able to wash themselves or eat without aid. maximum total score of MMT (20/20) is reached by the patients who
Blood pressures were measured using standard sphygmomanom- show the best physical abilities. MMT is accepted by numerous
eter measurements in the supine position and after 3 min of standing. French geriatric centers. This scale is an easy direct observation test
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) was defined as a drop in systolic blood which may be particularly useful in frail old people who present with
pressure of at least 20 mm Hg from the supine to the standing posi- severe postural and gait impairment in order to develop rehabilita-
tion at 3 min, or a drop in diastolic blood pressure of at least 10 mm tion goals.
Hg while standing, or both [13]. Walking speed was also calculated over a distance of 10 m and is
The number of falls in the past 6 months was noted using expressed in meters per second. All these gait and postural tests were
patient’s history notes and the information provided by the patient’s performed by our department’s physiotherapists.
family. These data were then correlated in order to determine an
Motor disturbances were assessed using a scale named the Mini eventual relationship with the presence of depression. Data were
Motor Test (MMT). MMT was elaborated 10 years ago in our center compared using the ¯2, and Fisher statistical tests.

304 Gerontology 2004;50:303–308 Turcu/Toubin/Mourey/D’Athis/


Manckoundia/Pfitzenmeyer
Table 2. General characteristics of the patients Results

Sex (female/male) 48/21


We included 69 older fallers (48 women and 21 men).
Mean age, years 84.1B6.6 (70–100)
Mini-Mental Status examination 21.8B6 (8–29) The mean age was 84.1 B 6.6 (range 70–100) years. Gen-
Geriatric Depression Scale 13.3B6.4 (3–24) eral characteristics of the patients are given in table 2.
Mini-Motor Test 13.6B4.9 (6–20) Depression was found in 46 fallers, corresponding to a
Walking speed, m/s 0.45B0.36 (0.08–0.96) prevalence of 66.7% (table 3). A comparison was made
Falls in the last 6 months 3.2B2.7
between depressed fallers (DF; GDS 110) and fallers
Orthostatic hypotension 16 (23%)
High level of dependency1 29 (42%) without depression (NDF; GDS ^10). The results are
shown in table 3. Depression was significantly more fre-
Unless otherwise indicated the values are the means B SD with quent among female fallers (p ! 0.05). Concerning the
ranges in parentheses. past history of depression, there was no statistically signif-
1 Patients in grades D, E, F and G, of the Katz index.
icant difference between the DF and the NDF groups (p =
0.087). Major anxiety was significantly more frequent in
the DF group compared to the NDF group (p = 0.015).
Although the number of past falls was higher in the DF
group compared to the NDF group (3.6 vs. 2.3), no signifi-
Table 3. Comparison of depressed fallers (DF group) and fallers cant difference was observed.
without depression (NDF group) There was no significant difference for OH in the DF
group compared to the NDF group (p = 0.157). This lack
NDF group DF group ¯2/Fisher
(n = 23) (n = 26)
of significant difference persisted after eliminating pa-
tients who had been taking antidepressive treatment.
Sex (male/female) 13/10 8/38 p! Although high levels of dependency were more fre-
0.001 quent in the DF group than in the NDF group (52.2 vs.
Past history of depression 7 (30%) 24 (52%) NS 21.8% of patients in grades D, E, F and G of the Katz
Major anxiety 2 (9%) 18 (39%) p ! 0.05
index), the difference did not reach the significant level
Orthostatic hypotension 3 (13%) 13 (28%) NS
High level of dependency1 5 (22%) 24 (52%) p= (p = 0.053).
0.053 We were able to perform the MMT for 54 patients. The
7 remaining patients either refused or presented osteoar-
The NDF group was composed of patients who presented a GDS ticular or neurological diseases which made evaluation
of ^10, and the DF group was composed of patients with a GDS of
impossible. Comparison of motor performances between
1 10.
1 Patients in grades D, E, F and G of the Katz index. the DF and the NDF groups are given in table 4. The
MMT score was significantly lower in the DF group com-

Table 4. Relationship between depression and MMT, walking speed, falls, associated diseases and MMSE

NDF group DF group ANOVA


Fisher test
patients mean B SD patients mean B SD

MMT 16 15.6B3.74 38 12.8B5.2 p ! 0.05


Walking speed, m/s 14 0.56B0.56 31 0.40B0.21 NS
Falls1 23 2.3B1.4 46 3.6B3.1 NS
Associated diseases 23 3.1B1.3 46 3.4B1.4 NS
MMSE 23 20.7B6.7 46 22.3B5.6 NS

1 Number of falls in the past 6 months.

Falls and Depression Gerontology 2004;50:303–308 305


Table 5. Comparison of depressed fallers
(DF) and fallers without depression (NDF) NDF group (n = 16) DF group (n = 38) ¯2/Fisher
for each part of the MMT (abilities in n % n %
bed, quality of the sitting position, abilities
in the standing position, and quality of gait) In bed score
0–1 4 25 9 23.7 NS
2 12 75 29 76.3
Sitting position score
0–2 3 18.7 10 26.3 NS
3 13 81.3 28 73.7
Standing position score
0–6 3 18.7 19 50 p ! 0.01
7–9 13 81.3 19 50
Gait score
0–3 7 43.7 26 68.4 NS
4–6 9 26.3 12 31.6

The NDF group was composed of patients who presented a GDS of ^10, and the DF
group was composed of patients with a GDS of 1 10.

pared to the NDF group (12.8 B 5.2 vs. 15.6 B 3.7). The [15], and (2) GDS has been validated in just as well medi-
2 groups were then compared for each part of the MMT cal outpatients as in medical inpatients [16].
(abilities in bed, quality of the sitting position, abilities in Previous studies have suggested that depression is
the standing position, and quality of gait). A significant associated with falls, and particularly with falls which
difference between groups was noted only for abilities in resulted in serious injury [17, 18]. To our knowledge,
the standing position; impairment was more pronounced there are no published data showing the prevalence of
in the DF that in the NDF group (table 5). depression in old hospitalized fallers. Such a high preva-
Walking speed was measured in 41 patients. The lence makes it essential to systematically search for de-
remaining 28 patients did not show enough standing and pression in old hospitalized fallers in order to initiate psy-
walking abilities to allow walking velocity to be measured. chological support and possibly antidepressive drug treat-
Although walking speed was higher in the NDF than in ment.
the DF group (0.56 B 0.56 vs. 0.40 B 0.21 m/s), the dif- A significant difference in the MMT score between the
ference was not statistically significant (table 4). DF and NDF groups was observed, showing that our
depressed patients had lower motor performances than
non-depressed ones. We choose to use the MMT score
Discussion over other validated geriatric assessments of posture and
gait in order to identify subjects at high risk of falling [19–
Our results show a high prevalence of depression 22]. This choice was imposed by the fact that, contrary to
among hospitalized fallers (66.7%). In elderly hospital- other tests, the MMT can assess motor abilities in bed and
ized patients, numerous studies have shown that the prev- in the sitting position in frail older patients who usually
alence of depression was high with a range between 12 show great disabilities in the standing position and walk-
and 45% [15]. To assess depression, a variety of self-rated ing. Then, this test makes it possible to assess the minimal
instruments have been used, and therefore may produce motor and postural abilities which may be dramatically
marker difference in prevalence rates. The GDS has been altered in depressed patients with motor retardation.
widely used and seems to be particularly suitable for the When comparisons were made according to the 4 parts of
diagnosis of depression in hospitalized elderly people the MMT test (abilities in bed, quality of the sitting posi-
because: (1) GDS focuses on the cognitive aspects of tion, abilities in the standing position, and quality of gait),
depressive illness rather than physical symptomatology only postural abilities in the standing position were signif-

306 Gerontology 2004;50:303–308 Turcu/Toubin/Mourey/D’Athis/


Manckoundia/Pfitzenmeyer
icantly altered in the DF compared to the NDF group. To manifestation being common to depression and frontal-
assess our population, the choice of MMT may be dis- subcortical dysfunction. In this way, we can hypothesize
cussed, because validation of this scale has been insuffi- that high rates of false-positive score may be observed
ciently published in international literature. Nevertheless, when the GDS is used in patients with frontal-subcortical
MMT assessment has largely been used in France for sev- dysfunction. (2) Brain damage in subcortical areas may be
eral years. Moreover, numerous items of the MMT which common in depression and postural abnormalities. Re-
assess disabilities in the standing position are used in the cent work has shown that white matter lesions (WML)
majority of other postural assessment scales such as the were associated with major depression in the older people
Tinetti test: quality of immediate standing with or with- [24]. WML in depressed older patients were also corre-
out support; quality of balance with eyes closed; quality of lated with a poor prognosis, and associated with altera-
one leg standing balance, and quality of reactive postural tions in cognitive performance [25, 26]. On the other
responses. That is why, we would like to think that our hand, several reports have suggested that WML might be
results, which showed that postural abilities in the stand- associated with gait disorders, postural abnormalities and
ing position were significantly altered in DF compared to mobility problems in very old patients, independent of
NDF, can be accepted. specific medical illness [23, 27–29]. Our results show that
Nevertheless, the correlation between postural distur- depressed patients showed no more frequent history of
bance and depression observed in present study cannot depression than non-depressed subjects, and these find-
make causal attributions: we do not know if depression ings support the idea that depression in our fallers may be
was a consequence of a fall, or if depression had triggered linked to organic neurological lesions.
the fall. Nevertheless, several suggestions may be given to Consequently, we think that depression and falls in
explain the link between depression and falls observed in very elderly subjects might be closely linked by a common
present study. (1) The use of the GDS to screen our frail pathophysiology. Nevertheless, more work is needed to
very elderly patients is not without problems. In previous establish the relationship between falls, depression and
works [15, 23], we noted that alterations in postural abili- WML.
ties were highly correlated with frontal-subcortical dys- In conclusion, this study observed a high prevalence of
function (called ‘psychomotor disadaptation syndrome’ depression among hospitalized fallers. Depression was
in the French literature) which is characterized by major associated with postural abnormalities probably consecu-
psychomotor retardation. Within the relationship be- tive to psychomotor retardation. Organic subcortical le-
tween psychological state and movement patterns, psy- sions may perhaps contribute to both the occurrence of
chomotor retardation appears as a common point be- depression and postural impairment. Nevertheless,
tween depression and falling [23]. Several items of the pathophysiological links between postural abnormalities
GDS are interested in slowness of activity which is associ- and depression still need to be elucidated.
ated with psychomotor retardation, this neurological

References

1 Lilley JM, Arie T, Chilvers CE: Accidents in- 5 Sloman L, Pierrynowski M, Berridge M, Tu- 9 Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O,
volving older people: A review of the literature. pling S, Flowers J: Mood, depressive illness and Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO: Development
Age Ageing 1995;24:346–365. gait patterns. Can J Psychiatry 1987;32:190– and validation of a geriatric screening depres-
2 American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics 193. sion scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr
Society, and American Academy of Orthopedic 6 Buchner DM, Cress ML, Esselman PC, Margh- Res 1983;17:37–49.
Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention: Guideline erita AJ, de Lateur BJ, Campbell AJ, Wagner 10 Yesavage JA: Geriatric depression scale. Psy-
for the prevention of falls in older persons. J EH: Factors associated with changes in gait chopharmacol Bull 1988;24:709–710.
Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:664–672. speed in older adults. J Gerontol 1996;51A: 11 Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHuth PR. Mini-
3 Ruthazer R, Lipsitz LA: Antidepressants and M297–M302. Mental State: A practical method for grading
falls among elderly people in long-term care. 7 Chang RW, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Hughes S: The the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.
Am J Public Health 1993;83:746–749. determinants of walking velocity in the elderly. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
4 Tinetti ME, Baker DI, Garett PA, Gottschalk Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:343–350. 12 Brorsson B, Asberg KH: Katz index of indepen-
M, Koch ML, Horwitz RI: Yale FICSIT: Risk 8 Lemke MR, Wendorff T, Mieth B, Buhl K, dence in ADL. Reliability and validity in short-
factor abatement strategy for fall prevention. J Linneman M: Spatiotemporal gait patterns term care. Scand J Rehabil Med 1984;16:125–
Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:315–320. during over ground locomotion in major de- 132.
pression compared with healthy controls. J
Psychiatr Res 2000;34:277–283.

Falls and Depression Gerontology 2004;50:303–308 307


13 Liu BA, Topper AK, Reeves RA, Gryfe C, 18 Whooley MA, Kip KE, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, 24 Salloway S, Malloy P, Kohn R, Gillard E, Duf-
Maki BE: Falls among older people: Relation- Nevitt MC, Browner WS: Depression, falls, fy J, Rogg J, Tung G, Richardson E, Thomas C,
ship to medication use and orthostatic hypo- and risk of fracture in older women. Study of Westlake R: MRI and neuropsychological dif-
tension. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:1141– Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch ferences in early- and late-life – Onset geriatric
1145. Intern Med 1999;159:484–490. depression. Neurology 1996;46:1567–1574.
14 Mourey F, Camus A, Mischis C, Pfitzenmeyer 19 Tinetti M: Performance-oriented assessment of 25 Kramer-Ginsberg E, Greenwald BS, Krishnan
P: Assessment of balance and mobility in frail mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am KR, Christiansen B, Hu J, Ashtari M, Patel M,
elderly patients: Validation of the Mini Motor Geriatr Soc 1986;34:119–126. Pollack S: Neuropsychological functioning and
Test. 17th World Congr Int Assoc Gerontol, 20 Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J, MRI signal hyperintensities in geriatric depres-
Vancouver, 2001. Gerontology 2001;47(suppl Maki B: Measuring balance in the elderly: Vali- sion. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:438–444.
1):467. dation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 26 O’Brien J, Ames D, Chiu E, Schweitzer I, Des-
15 Jackson R, Baldwin B: Detecting depression in 1992;83:S7–S11. mond P, Tress B: Severe deep white matter
elderly medically ill patients: The use of the 21 Wolfson L, Whipple R: Gait assessment in the lesions and outcome in elderly patients with
Geriatric Depression Scale compared with elderly: A gait abnormality rating scale and its major depressive disorder: Follow-up study.
medical and nursing observations. Age Ageing relation to falls. J Gerontol 1990;45:M12– BMJ 1998;317:982–984.
1993;22:349–353. M19. 27 Masdeu J, Wolfson L, Lantos G, Tobin JN,
16 Koenig HG, Meador KG, Cohen HJ, Blazer 22 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed ‘Up & Grober E, Whipple R, Amerman P: Brain
DG: Screening for depression in elderly medi- Go’: A test of basic functional mobility for frail white matter changes in the elderly prone to
cal inpatients: Taking a closer look. J Am Ger- elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39: falling. Arch Neurol 1989;46:1292–1296.
iatr Soc 1992;40:1013–1017. 142–148. 28 Briley DP, Wasay M, Sergent S, Thomas S:
17 Tinetti M: Factors associated with serious inju- 23 Pfitzenmeyer P, Martin-Hunyadi C, Mourey F, Cerebral white matter changes (leukoaraiosis),
ry during falls by ambulatory nursing home res- d’Athis Ph, Baudouin N, Mischis-Troussard C: stroke, and gait disturbance. J Am Geriatr Soc
idents: J Am Geriatr Soc 1987;35:644–648. Cardiovascular characteristics and cerebral CT 1997;45:1434–1438.
findings in elderly subjects with psychomotor 29 Camicioli R, Moore MM, Sexton G, Howieson
disadaptation syndrome. Aging Clin Exp Res DB, Kaye JA: Age-related brain changes associ-
2002;14:100–107. ated with motor function in healthy older peo-
ple. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:330–334.

308 Gerontology 2004;50:303–308 Turcu/Toubin/Mourey/D’Athis/


Manckoundia/Pfitzenmeyer
View publication stats

You might also like