Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T-Mu-Md-00009-Sp-V2.0 - AEO Authorisation Model
T-Mu-Md-00009-Sp-V2.0 - AEO Authorisation Model
T-Mu-Md-00009-Sp-V2.0 - AEO Authorisation Model
Specification
Version 2.0
Issued date: 29 August 2017
Important message
This document is one of a set of standards developed solely and specifically for use on Transport Assets (as defined in the Asset
Standards Authority Charter). It is not suitable for any other purpose.
The copyright and any other intellectual property in this document will at all times remain the property of the State of New South Wales
(Transport for NSW).
You must not use or adapt this document or rely upon it in any way unless you are providing products or services to a NSW
Government agency and that agency has expressly authorised you in writing to do so. If this document forms part of a contract with, or
is a condition of approval by a NSW Government agency, use of the document is subject to the terms of the contract or approval. To be
clear, the content of this document is not licensed under any Creative Commons Licence.
This document may contain third party material. The inclusion of third party material is for illustrative purposes only and does not
represent an endorsement by NSW Government of any third party product or service.
If you use this document or rely upon it without authorisation under these terms, the State of New South Wales (including Transport for
NSW) and its personnel does not accept any liability to you or any other person for any loss, damage, costs and expenses that you or
anyone else may suffer or incur from your use and reliance on the content contained in this document. Users should exercise their own
skill and care in the use of the document.
This document may not be current and is uncontrolled when printed or downloaded. Standards may be accessed from the Asset
Standards Authority website at www.asa.transport.nsw.gov.au
Standard governance
Owner: Manager Authorisation, Asset Standards Authority
Authoriser: Director Authorisation and Audit, Asset Standards Authority
Approver: Executive Director, Asset Standards Authority on behalf of the ASA Configuration Control
Board
Document history
Version Summary of Changes
1.0 First issue 8 May 2017
2.0 Inclusion of maritime engineering disciplines
Preface
The Asset Standards Authority (ASA) is a key strategic branch of Transport for NSW (TfNSW).
As the network design and standards authority for NSW Transport Assets, as specified in the
ASA Charter, the ASA identifies, selects, develops, publishes, maintains and controls a suite of
requirements documents on behalf of TfNSW, the asset owner.
The ASA deploys TfNSW requirements for asset and safety assurance by creating and
managing TfNSW's governance models, documents and processes. To achieve this, the ASA
focuses on four primary tasks:
• publishing and managing TfNSW's process and requirements documents including TfNSW
plans, standards, manuals and guides
• collaborating with the Transport cluster and industry through open engagement
The AEO framework authorises engineering organisations to supply and provide asset related
products and services to TfNSW. It works to assure the safety, quality and fitness for purpose of
those products and services over the asset's whole-of-life. AEOs are expected to demonstrate
how they have applied the requirements of ASA documents, including TfNSW plans, standards
and guides, when delivering assets and related services for TfNSW.
Compliance with ASA requirements by itself is not sufficient to ensure satisfactory outcomes for
NSW Transport Assets. The ASA expects that professional judgement be used by competent
personnel when using ASA requirements to produce those outcomes.
This specification forms part of a suite of documents that describe the management of the AEO
model.
Table of contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 7
2. Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 7
2.1. Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
2.2. Application ............................................................................................................................................. 7
3. Reference documents ............................................................................................................................. 7
4. Terms and definitions ............................................................................................................................. 8
5. AEO authorisation arrangements ........................................................................................................ 10
5.1. AEO assessment method .................................................................................................................... 11
5.2. AEO surveillance method .................................................................................................................... 13
6. AEO authorisation model ..................................................................................................................... 15
7. AEO authorisation scoping .................................................................................................................. 17
7.1. Specifying scope of authorisation in T MU MD 00009 F1 and T MA MD 00009 F1............................ 19
7.2. Scoping for specialist assurance services ........................................................................................... 20
7.3. Scoping for management assurance ................................................................................................... 20
7.4. Scoping for engineering management services .................................................................................. 21
7.5. Scoping for non-asset specific specialist engineering services ........................................................... 22
7.6. Scale and complexity of authorised services ....................................................................................... 22
7.7. Grouping of cells in the matrix ............................................................................................................. 22
7.8. Arrangements for personnel ................................................................................................................ 23
7.9. AEO organisational boundaries ........................................................................................................... 23
7.10. Customer evidence supporting the selected scope ......................................................................... 24
8. AEO maturity .......................................................................................................................................... 24
8.1. AEO requirements ............................................................................................................................... 25
8.2. AEO maturity rating ............................................................................................................................. 26
9. AEO authorisation assessment process ............................................................................................ 27
9.1. Step one - initial engagement .............................................................................................................. 28
9.2. Step two - scoping and self-assessment ............................................................................................. 29
9.3. Step three - ASA assessment.............................................................................................................. 30
9.4. Step four - follow-on assessment site visits (optional) ........................................................................ 31
9.5. Step five - assessment finalisation ...................................................................................................... 32
10. AEO services supporting TfNSW asset life cycle .............................................................................. 32
10.1. Transport needs analysis, model or plan ......................................................................................... 33
10.2. Operations concept development .................................................................................................... 33
10.3. Maintenance concept development ................................................................................................. 34
10.4. Optioneering .................................................................................................................................... 34
10.5. Business requirements specification or user requirements ............................................................. 34
10.6. Single option development .............................................................................................................. 35
10.7. System requirements specification (SRS) development ................................................................. 35
10.8. Concept or reference design ........................................................................................................... 36
1. Introduction
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) is collaborating with industry to improve the engineering
governance of TfNSW asset related projects and to employ skilled resources from both
government and industry more effectively. A key initiative is the Authorised Engineering
Organisation (AEO) model. This document provides engineering organisations and other
stakeholders, including the ASA and other TfNSW business units, with details of the AEO model
and authorisation process.
2. Purpose
Details of the AEO model and authorisation process are provided in this document for
engineering organisations and other stakeholders, including the ASA and other TfNSW
business units. This process allows organisations to obtain AEO authorisation by demonstrating
that they have appropriate systems, processes, resources and competencies to deliver and
assure engineering services to the TfNSW transport network.
2.1. Scope
This document covers the AEO authorisation model and process.
2.2. Application
This document applies organisations seeking to provide engineering services to TfNSW as well
as organisations that have gained AEO status.
This document is also designed to inform TfNSW and its agencies of the authorisation
processes.
3. Reference documents
The following documents are cited in the text. For dated references, only the cited edition
applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document applies.
Australian standards
AS/NZS ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 Systems and software engineering - System life cycle processes
TfNSW standards
ASA Charter
applicant an organisation that has applied to the ASA for consideration for AEO status
asset life cycle stages for an asset from recognition of need through to disposal and any
residual risks or liability period
assurance is a set of structured and planned activities conducted through the asset life cycle
providing progressive justified confidence that objectives are being achieved and that the asset
is or will be fit for purpose
auditor the ASA representative that performs ongoing surveillance audits of the AEO
compliance the state or fact of according with, or meeting, rules, requirements or standards
CT current transformer
HV high voltage
IP internet protocol
IT information technology
LV low voltage
noncompliance not having the ability to operate in accordance with the AEO authorisation
requirements
PA public address
PV photovoltaic
transport infrastructure infrastructure (including associated vehicles, vessels and rolling stock)
used for or in connection with or to facilitate the movement of persons and freight by road, rail,
sea, air or other mode of transport (including walking and cycling). It includes:
e) systems, works, structures, buildings, plant, machinery and equipment associated with or
incidental to transport infrastructure.
VT voltage transformer
The AEO model provides the mechanism for determining the AEO scope of authorised services
and matching it with that required by the TfNSW scope of services for a project. See Section 5.1
for details.
The AEO authorisation process consists of an initial assessment for the defined scope of
engineering services and periodic surveillance of the engineering services provided by an AEO
to TfNSW or on behalf of TfNSW and possible scope expansion assessments or re-
assessments.
services. It also provides assurance that a supplier can perform those services at the necessary
level of maturity.
The initial level of surveillance is based on the risk identified in the assessment. This will be
adjusted depending upon further risks and issues identified as part of service delivery. This
allows the ASA to ensure that surveillance levels remain appropriate to the level of
demonstrated self-assurance by the AEO along with the associated risk. As the assessed risk
level reduces, confidence in the supplier increases and the frequency and depth of surveillance
reduces. See Section 5.2 for more details.
The assessment is conducted by examining evidence against the AEO requirements and
industry best practice as applicable to the proposed scope of authorisation for a defined scope
of works.
• AEO risk profile, or confidence level of an AEO based on the maturity ratings and identified
weaknesses
The approved scope of authorisation is represented in the supplier's engineering services matrix
which lists a range of transport related engineering disciplines, services and activities the
supplier is authorised to deliver and assure. See Section 6 for details.
The scope identification and verification is done during the assessment through verification of
the applicant's record of relevant experience and the suitability of the relevant organisational
processes and practices.
The scope of authorisation can be expanded through the scope expansion assessment.
The authorisation of the supplier also includes consideration of the maturity of the organisational
systems and tools that are used to deliver and assure engineering services. The AEO maturity
assessment model used by the ASA is based upon recognised industry frameworks and
standards.
• Detailed assessment phase when the ASA assesses the maturity of organisational
systems and processes through the evaluation of compliance to the relevant AEO
requirements (this is optional for scope expansion assessments or re-assessments). It also
verifies evidence of relevant experience of successful delivery, assurance and verification
using the deployed processes and systems in accordance with the expected relevant
industry practices.
If an AEO has an identified weakness and relevant open actions and performs work for TfNSW,
then there can be a need to mitigate the associated risks by advising the relevant TfNSW
project team the AEO is engaged with.
When an AEO undergoes a significant material change it shall inform the ASA as soon as
possible as a re-assessment can be required. This will be determined by the ASA in
collaboration with the AEO. Material changes can include, but are not necessarily limited to,
changes to the following:
• AEO ownership
It is expected that the AEO establishes a long-term direct engagement with the ASA 'in the spirit
of AEO' and to ensure mutually beneficial collaboration and knowledge transfer on AEO related
matters to support industry growth and the AEO model benefits realisation.
A member of the AEO management team shall be appointed as an AEO representative to act
as a direct contact with the ASA. This role cannot be substituted by the third party consultant.
Surveillance activities aim to maintain ASA awareness and confidence in relation to the ongoing
AEO performance, scope of authorisation and level of maturity.
During this phase the ASA continues monitoring the AEO systems, processes, procedures,
tools and deliverables.
• residual risk identified in the original assessment including level of maturity rating and
identified weaknesses
• service delivery risks that depend on the nature and level of the AEO involvement with
TfNSW works (complex high risk works, or low profile low risk projects)
• AEO performance including issues of a systemic nature identified through other sources
during AEO engagements with TfNSW
The surveillance phase aims to ensure that an AEO remains compliant against its assessed
level of capability within the authorised scope and to understand the impacts of major changes
or incidents on an organisation's authorisation.
The surveillance is aligned with AEO involvement in TfNSW works and its performance. While
surveillance is an independent ASA program, it relies on communication from the AEO and the
involved TfNSW agency to provide early warning of factors or incidents that can impact on an
AEO’s authorisation. Surveillance activities can also be informed through the outcomes of the
relevant TfNSW service delivery activities such as project or program monitoring and control
events, judgement of significance events and other assurance activities.
• AEO diligence in managing agreed actions from assessment and surveillance audit
findings and the type of findings
• risk factors such as project or contract technical risk and the AEO's maturity ratings and
identified weaknesses
• notification by TfNSW of AEO performance issues indicating systemic issues with an AEO
• incidents such as project delivery or AEO organisational changes that represent a systemic
issue impacting on an AEO's ability to deliver asset life cycle services
• collection and review of information about AEO engagements and performance on the
TfNSW projects
• monitoring the progress of actions arising from nominated ASA assessment and
surveillance audit activities
• regular periodic AEO surveillance audits of the AEO performance within the existing scope
of authorisation
The initial frequency of surveillance audits is based on the level of risk associated with the
AEO's maturity assessed during the authorisation phase and the results of ad hoc audits
triggered by incidents, risk or nonconformance raised by a TfNSW stakeholder.
The output of these ongoing surveillance activities impacts on the consequent frequency, depth
and focus of subsequent surveillance activities.
• requirement for action plans from the AEO to address identified nonconformance
• withdrawal of selected engineering service areas or disciplines from the AEO status
2. serious incident affecting TfNSW staff, contractor, passenger or general public safety
Conditions one and two would normally be reported to the ASA by means of existing TfNSW
contracting arrangements with the AEO.
2. AEO requirements that represent expected organisational practices as suitable for the
scope of authorisation
3. capability maturity ratings definition that represents the level of compliance to the model
requirements
The AEO model allows for assessing and representing organisational engineering service
delivery and assurance capability through the following:
The scope of authorised engineering services outlines the range of engineering services an
AEO is recognised to be able to provide in relation to the TfNSW Transport Assets supporting
the TfNSW asset life cycle. It is represented using T MU MD 00009 F1 AEO Engineering
Services Matrix or T MA MD 00009 F1 AEO Engineering Services Matrix - Maritime, each a two
dimensional representation of engineering services. The vertical columns are based on the
TfNSW asset life cycle model phases to ensure consistent coverage and ease of alignment of
engineering activities an AEO may offer with the TfNSW asset life cycle model. The horizontal
rows are engineering disciplines and sub-disciplines that require distinctly different skills,
systems, tools and processes.
When an organisation applies for AEO status it shall define the scope of engineering services it
intends to deliver to TfNSW or on behalf of TfNSW using T MU MD 00009 F1 or
T MA MD 00009 F1.
There is also a set of AEO requirements that represent recognised industry best practice that
needs to be in place as suitable to the scope of authorisation. These requirements are grouped
into eleven generic engineering management capabilities that are used to assess and quantify
organisational maturity within the selected scope of engineering services. These requirements
are provided in T MU MD 00009 ST AEO Authorisation Requirements.
Section 7 to Section 8 provide further details of these two AEO model elements.
Bidding AEOs use their own matrix to demonstrate their combined AEO authorisation coverage
against the project needs.
Section 7.1 to Section 7.10 elaborate on rules for authorisation scoping identification and
documenting.
o output provided
o specialist engineering sub-disciplines used to further define and clarify the specific
service an organisation can provide at the lowest level allowed by the AEO model
• engineering services related to the TfNSW asset life cycle activities in vertical columns that
an AEO may offer which has direct reference to the systems engineering life cycle
processes defined by AS/NZS ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 Systems and software engineering -
System life cycle processes
The current list of specialist engineering disciplines covers heavy rail and light rail services
including rolling stock, signalling and control systems, communications, track engineering, civil
and related engineering, buildings and stations, and electrical engineering.
1. services specific to a particular AEO asset life cycle activity for a specialist engineering
sub-discipline
More details and definitions for life cycle activities and disciplines are contained in Section 10 to
Section 12.
integration and interfacing and systems safety assurance integration across the entire scope of
authorisation.
The authorised service provision and assurance including specialist assurance is accomplished
using the organisation's own processes, tools and competency capabilities.
The scope of authorisation is specified by marking the relevant cell with an X in the matrix.
The notes section at the bottom of the matrix should be used to specify details of the selection
as suitable. For example, the added elaboration text to the marked cell with X 'Design' activity
could be 'independent design review only'. The notes section of the matrix is also used to clarify
and record any conditions or limitations to the authorised capability.
Section 10 to Section 11.8 explains the various elements of the engineering service matrix to
assist in the completion of the matrix.
The authorisation option for the specialist assurance only service is only available for disciplines
or activities where this is an existing recognised industry practice. Expected processes, tools
and competency capabilities for the technical assurance only authorisation are assessed.
The selection in the service matrix is made by marking the relevant cell with an X and also by
making a relevant comment (for example, independent specialist assurance only) in the notes
section of the matrix.
For example, there exists an engineering, procurement, and construction management (EPCM)
arrangement that is a special form of contracting for some projects within the infrastructure,
transport, mining, resources and energy industries. In an EPCM arrangement, the client selects
a contractor who provides management services for the whole project on behalf of the client.
The EPCM contractor coordinates all design, procurement and construction work and ensures
that the whole project is completed as required and in time.
The EPCM contractor may or may not undertake actual site work. It depends on the contractor's
specialist engineering capabilities that are scoped separately in the engineering services matrix.
Note: There is no need to select the engineering services management section in the
matrix to demonstrate the ability for an organisation to manage its own authorised
specialist asset or non-asset specific services scope including engaging
subcontractors within its own scope of authorised specialist disciplines to support its
business. This is the default assessed and recognised to be an inherent capability that
is detailed in T MU MD 00009 ST. Any restrictions, weaknesses in relation to this
capability are documented in the matrix notes section in relation to the impacted scope
of authorisation.
These are not internal organisational capabilities supporting its operations, but services it can
deliver externally as specialist services – although the name of those services can be identical
to the internal organisational capabilities listed in the AEO requirements document.
For example, there can be a service offering to provide a specialised non-asset specific
requirements management engineering, verification and validation, human factors integration,
configuration management, or systems integration service (process, tools, personnel or
management) to other organisations for some project or program.
Scoping is documented by placing an X in the relevant cell of the non-asset specific engineering
services section of the services matrix and also adding mandatory notes as guided in this
specification. The selection indicates that an organisation is capable of delivering and self-
assuring (including necessary specialist assurance and management assurance - as
appropriate) the selected non-asset specific specialist engineering service.
Conditions and limitations for those capabilities shall be outlined in the notes section of the
matrix.
The service offering of only managing non-asset specific services (for example managing
service integration or managing systems safety assurance) that do not require specialist
qualifications, tools and systems that are necessary to deliver the service are scoped in the
engineering management section of the services matrix (with appropriate notes). See Section
7.4 for details.
The notes section of the matrix can be used to provide relevant comments based on the
assessment findings.
practice may be discussed during assessment. However, the model does not prescribe any
formal rules in this regard.
Grouping of various service capabilities in the organisational matrix for the purpose of matching
the requirements for a particular work package or project delivery outcome is a project or
contract matter and not defined in the AEO model.
There may be no in-house competent personnel available for some positions all the time or at
the time of assessment to cover the entire scope of authorisation. This is acceptable if an
organisation can demonstrate through documentation and proven delivery history that it meets
all competency management AEO requirements and can demonstrate its capability to
successfully mobilise-demobilise and manage its services delivery teams using its own
competency management system and necessary core permanent in-house personnel. It is
unlikely that an organisation will be able to demonstrate compliance with the AEO competency
management requirements without having any skilled core specialist personnel in-house.
However, the AEO model does not explicitly prohibit this arrangement.
In such a scenario evidence of the organisational ability to manage the local Australian and
NSW domain knowledge capability is important.
This can be a business entity with its own registered business name, own Australian Business
Number or overseas equivalent, a subsidiary of a larger organisation, an entire multinational
organisation, a distinct organisational unit or department within a larger organisation or an
alliance consisting of more than one organisation. The legal details of the grouping are not
relevant to the AEO model as long as the authorised entity boundaries can be clearly identified
and processes, systems and tools ownership, integration and adherence can be demonstrated.
The agreed AEO authorisation boundaries are decided at the time of authorisation.
The applicant shall demonstrate its most relevant experience in the successful delivery and
assurance of the selected activities within the proposed scope life cycle activity for the specialist
sub-discipline or non-asset specific service. The following evidence should be meaningful and
specific for each selected activity:
• the project name and brief meaningful description of the relevant successfully delivered
and assured service
• the most suitable evidence supporting the service referred to in the preceding bullet point
which could be work product examples (reports and design examples), signed plans,
acceptance certificates and so on - that would clearly demonstrate to the relevant ASA
SME what work has been done, assured and successfully accepted
Only a few of the most relevant evidences are to be demonstrated for each AEO requirement
and discipline applied for. Necessary detailed guidance in relation for any particular scope or
discipline will be provided by the ASA.
8. AEO maturity
An applicant shall demonstrate justified confidence in their own systems and processes to
deliver and assure effective asset life cycle services in compliance with the prescribed AEO
requirements as applicable.
These requirements are specified in T MU MD 00009 ST and represent the list of necessary
organisational practices that are assessed against recognised industry best practice as relevant
to the authorisation and allow for quantifying organisational maturity for the selected
engineering services. The same AEO model is used during the surveillance period to monitor
AEO performance.
The assessed maturity is an indication of the level of risk associated with the delivery processes
of an organisation. More highly integrated and elaborate organisational systems and tools will
result in a higher rating indicating a greater likelihood that an organisation will repeatedly
produce consistent outcomes for its customers. The minimum acceptable maturity rating reflects
the acceptable level of risk in permitting the organisation to participate in the procurement
process.
Organisations are not expected to develop bespoke processes for AEO assessment or
specifically for TfNSW projects except for necessary alignments of processes with the TfNSW
Configuration Management and Asset Assurance Committee (CMAAC) processes if an AEO
plans to interface with TfNSW and deliver directly to TfNSW. Organisations are required to
demonstrate how their existing processes deliver and assure asset life cycle services to the
required level of quality.
Where processes or practices, or both are not sufficiently mature, organisations are encouraged
to improve their existing processes and systems using the recognised industry best practice and
as suitable for the business.
The maturity assessment is done by verifying the most relevant evidence of compliance to
industry best practice for AEO requirements of an organisation’s documented systems and
deployed or executed practices for a particular scope as applicable.
• final ratings
The detailed list of requirements, including supporting guidance specific to the discipline and the
life cycle phase, references to other relevant standards and examples of typical evidence to
assist the applicant to self-assess are provided in T MU MD 00009 ST.
The ASA provides self-assessment tools and forms and guides applicants in relation to the AEO
requirements applicability and compliance evaluation.
The engineering management capabilities addressed in items one to nine in the preceding list
represent capabilities that are always applicable; however the extent of applicability and typical
evidence will differ depending on the scope of authorisation and other limitations. For example,
some specific design AEO requirements may not be applicable for a construction company or a
consultancy that provides a niche non-asset specific engineering service.
If a particular capability consists of only one AEO requirement – this requirement is always
applicable and assessed. For example, the configuration management requirement is always
applicable although the method of fulfilment depends on the scope of authorisation and the
nature of the AEO scope. The configuration management scope can vary from the very complex
configuration and change management processes aligned with the CMAAC process to the
simple basic work product or document control.
For each applicable AEO requirement the applicant shall provide evidence of both documented
and deployed aspects of applicant systems.
Maturity ratings range from zero to five as shown in Table 1. A rating of zero or one
demonstrates that the relevant AEO requirement is not implemented at all or documented or
deployed unpredictably and inconsistently with poor control and is reactive. A rating of five
demonstrates evidence of effective and efficient fulfilment of the requirement with full control
backed up with continuous measured optimisation and improvement.
Level four and level five can only be achieved in addition to full compliance to maturity rating
three.
The rating impacts the frequency of surveillance audits. An organisation that demonstrates a
high level of maturity and compliance will have a less frequent surveillance period than an
organisation that demonstrates a low level of maturity.
• scope expansion applications from AEOs to add service areas and disciplines
An organisation can apply to be assessed outside the normal procurement cycle. In this case
the organisation will not have a current contract or will have a contract issued prior to the roll out
of the AEO model. The scope of assessment will depend on the organisational business goals.
The scope will be clarified during the preparation for assessment and verified during the actual
assessment.
An organisation can also be required to apply for or complete an AEO authorisation assessment
or undertake an AEO scope expansion for a particular project as part of a tendering process
should the complexity and nature of the tender require it. In this case, the scope and the
timeline for the authorisation assessment will be defined by the project needs.
1. initial engagement
3. ASA assessment
5. assessment finalisation
Successful completion of steps one and two result in the organisation being granted
pre-qualified organisation status.
Successful completion of steps three or four can result in the ASA issuing a letter of intent to
recommend AEO authorisation. This option is available to support the procurement timeline if
necessary.
Further information about steps one to five is provided in Section 9.1 to Section 9.5.
After successful completion of the assessment the ASA issues the following to the AEO:
• authorisation certificate
The ASA assigns a facilitator to guide the applicant through the assessment process.
The facilitator provides the applicant with forms to collect the necessary information about the
applicant and arranges an initial meeting for new organisations. At the initial meeting the AEO
process is explained in detail and documents and tools are provided to the applicant.
At this stage a determination is made for new applicants, in consultation with relevant ASA
SMEs if required, whether an applicant needs to become an AEO. This determination is based
on the applicant profile and other information related to the nature of the applicant's business
and services provided.
Where existing AEOs require authorisation scope expansion or re-assessment the process
commences with a meeting with an ASA facilitator who explains the process as applicable.
The timeline depends on the defined scope of authorisation, applicant needs and the ASA
service priority and can be driven by procurement.
• connecting the applicant with various ASA SME groups via email and telephone or with
meetings at the ASA in exceptional cases
• assisting the applicant enrolling in relevant ASA educational and information sessions
where the applicant needs education or guidance in relation to particular AEO
requirements or documents
The ASA provides a variety of supporting materials including guides, FAQs and videos. There
are also regular information and education sessions held by various ASA SME groups where
relevant AEO requirements and expectations are explained in detail.
After completing the applicant self-assessment the applicant shall submit its responses.
At this stage the ASA facilitator accepts the self-assessment responses and examines the
information for relevance and completeness involving relevant ASA SMEs. All scope-related
issues and any issues related to completeness of responses and relevance of listed evidence
are resolved through facilitation between the applicant and the ASA. The ASA facilitator
involves the ASA SMEs as required. Face-to-face meetings at the ASA premises are possible
only in exceptional cases.
When the self-assessment pre-validation is completed to the satisfaction of the ASA the
applicant is requested to submit supporting evidence organised in a way that provides clear
traceability between the relevant responses in self-assessment tools and evidence. Once the
submission is accepted and validated the applicant is considered to have been qualified for
assessment for the entire scope or for the applied scope expansion.
• alignment and concurrency of assessment activities and information flow from an ASA
perspective
The intent is to ensure consistency and alignment of the assessment process through close
collaboration between ASA systems SMEs, assessing systems and processes maturity and the
ASA specialist SMEs, verifying suitability of documentation and evidence of deployment of
those systems, in accordance with industry best practice for the delivery and self-assurance of
engineering services for specific engineering discipline.
The facilitator manages and monitors the assessment progress in accordance with the plan and
manages communication with the applicant including requests for clarification raised by SMEs.
The duration of this stage depends on the scope of assessment; however, it should typically
take less than two weeks.
An organisation's process maturity evaluation is done by verifying the correctness and suitability
of the applicant responses and evidence as follows:
• for adherence of those to the acceptable TfNSW and the industry expectation or practice
for that requirement implementation as suitable for the applied scope of engineering
disciplines
• evidence of process deployment for disciplines or services within the scope of authorisation
(relevant deliverables and processes tailoring to the specific discipline)
• detailed and aggregated maturity ratings that reflect the required relevant practices
maturity within the scope of authorisation
• final scope of authorisation that would only include services where the demonstrated
maturity of relevant processes and practices (AEO requirements) is above the minimum
acceptable level (level two)
The ASA assessment is not an assessment of the applicant's personnel involved in the
assessment unless the assessed capability depends on a particular person's expertise. In this
case it will be a condition of authorisation that the person is available and that the organisation
shall undertake an agreed reasonable action or effort to document the process or capability.
Note: The ASA assessment does not include detailed technical review of the work
products for compliance to all applicable ASA engineering standards as it is limited to
verification that a suitable process was applied and the presented outcome was
successfully delivered or accepted by the client.
This can be done as face-to-face individual or group assessment interviews at the applicant's
site if required. The efficiency in conducting the assessment shall be taken into account.
A post-assessment internal ASA review is conducted. This review requires the assessment
team to undertake a final joint overview of the applicant's submission and the assessment
outcomes. Following this the assessment team shares opinions and concerns, discusses risks
and issues and identifies new concerns or risks including those that can arise as a significant
area of concern. This can result in raising additional areas of concern, conditions of
authorisation or a decision not to recommend AEO authorisation.
During this stage, the lessons learned and process improvement suggestions shall be
discussed and documented. The review is organised as required and can be conducted by
telephone, email or meetings. A post-assessment report is created by the facilitator to capture
the outcome of the review.
After the assessment report is reviewed internally within the ASA, the applicant is consulted to
obtain their commitment and timeline to close actions.
Where the assessment identifies partial or full noncompliance against some AEO authorisation
requirements this does not necessarily lead to refusal but can result in the imposition of
conditions on the AEO status. The imposition of conditions occurs if the ASA concludes that
identified noncompliance findings are not significant enough to refuse authorisation and agrees
to accept the applicant's commitment to eliminate the noncompliance within a reasonable
period. The facilitator will discuss, agree and record any actions the applicant needs to perform
to achieve compliance.
After the assessment is finalised internally and reviewed with the customer the authorisation
pack including AEO letter of authorisation, AEO certificate, signed and approved AEO
assessment summary report and signed engineering services matrix is issued.
The ASA publishes the new or updated AEO engineering services matrix on ASA website.
Authorisation can be applied for and granted for an authorised entity for engineering services
that are represented in the AEO engineering services matrix.
T MU MD 00009 F1 and T MA MD 00009 F1 are used for scoping of AEO authorised services.
Section 10 provides information on services described in each column of the matrices which are
aligned with the TfNSW asset life cycle.
AEOs may provide the service of performing a needs analysis, model demand and potential
services or plan for TfNSW assets.
This engineering service would normally be undertaken by TfNSW; however an AEO can be
requested to perform some or the entire analysis for their particular discipline as a technical
advisor to TfNSW.
This activity is where stakeholders are consulted and managed; the needs are defined and
tested. This TfNSW asset life cycle element is utilised to define the strategy and specific
requirements in a business context. Activities may include high level strategic modelling and
planning.
The AEO defines the extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of developing an operations concept for the proposed services in
support of the TfNSW asset life cycle plan phase.
This engineering service would normally be undertaken by TfNSW however an AEO can be
requested as a technical advisor to provide input for some or the entire concept for their
particular discipline.
This activity is a strategic guide to how the need and demand will be achieved over the life cycle
of the asset. The operations concept development (OCD) is required in order to understand how
assets will be operated to achieve the service.
For additional information regarding the OCD see T MU AM 06008 ST Operations Concept
Definition and T MU AM 06010 GU Business Requirements Specification.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of developing a maintenance concept for assets in support of the
TfNSW asset life cycle Plan phase.
The maintenance concept development (MCD) defines how the assets are going to be
maintained and supported over the life of the system in a cost effective manner. The MCD is an
input into the subsequent design process and can be combined into one document with the
OCD.
For additional information regarding the MCD see T MU AM 06009 ST Maintenance Concept
Definition.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
10.4. Optioneering
This life cycle activity covers engineering support in performing optioneering and trade-off
studies for various infrastructure options to support the business case.
AEOs may provide the service of developing an options assessment of multiple possible
solutions in support of the TfNSW asset life cycle plan phase.
The optioneering element includes the options intended to support the concepts within the
business case. The optioneering in this phase will include the no asset option and other high
level trade-offs and options to be considered in the project justification business case. Any
options should include that assets are fit for purpose for its intended use including whole-of-life
considerations.
This is not the low level design solution optioneering that takes place in the design phase of the
life cycle.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of developing business or user requirements in support of the
TfNSW asset life cycle plan phase.
This service would normally be undertaken by TfNSW however an AEO can be requested to
provide input as a technical advisor for some or the entire business or user requirements for
their particular discipline.
The business requirements specification (BRS) is a document in which the business opportunity
or problem space is defined. A BRS documents the business goals, business needs, and
business capabilities and also references the customer requirements that should be achieved
by the project or program. The BRS precedes the development of the system requirements
specification (SRS) and is a subset of the total requirements needed to characterise the
solution. A BRS is prepared before a final business case, which outlines why the project is
being developed or changed.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide a service developing a single preferred option as an output from the options
analysis, to be considered in the project justification final business case.
Single option development would normally be undertaken by TfNSW as part of the TfNSW
asset life cycle plan phase however an AEO can be requested to provide input for some of the
development of the option for assets.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide a service developing system requirements as the responsible party for
assets in support of the plan phase of the asset life cycle.
The SRS, alternatively referred to as the system requirements document, is a description of the
solution of what the system should do, in terms of the system’s functions, interactions and
interfaces with its operational environment. It communicates the stakeholder requirements to
the industry supply chain who will specify and build the system.
For additional information regarding the SRS see T MU AM 06007 GU Guide to Requirements
Definition and Analysis.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the concept or reference design for assets in support of the plan phase of
the asset life cycle.
The concept or reference design traces to the SRS and identifies the design in sufficient detail
to go to tender for the detailed design and construction.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
10.9. Design
AEOs may provide the design for assets as part of the acquire phase of the asset life cycle.
The design ensures that requirements are traced and allocated to subsystems and translated
into a physical design solution.
The service may include preliminary design (engineering design to 70% completion) or detailed
design (engineering design to 100%) to approved for construction (AFC) including production of
material procurement specifications and final acceptance of design prior to construction.
Some examples of considerations during design include, but are not limited to the following:
• safety
• interfaces
• whole-of-life cost
• human factors
• constructability
• design assurance
• design management
• supportability
• security
• resilience
• test requirements
• design life
Design AEOs will be required to have capability to provide design support during construction,
inspection, test and commissioning stages.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
A contracted AEO provides this service on behalf of TfNSW and is accountable for assuring the
selection and delivery of supply as well as verifying and validating it in accordance with TfNSW
requirements and expectations. Such expectations include, but are not limited to the following:
• the product is fit for purpose for its intended use (including whole-of-life and reliability,
availability, maintainability and safety (RAMS) considerations where necessary)
• the delivery of the physical resources or materials is coordinated with the end user and an
appropriate handover is conducted
Verifying and validating the supply can include activities such as checking the test certificates,
inspection of materials compliance to design and assembly and acceptance testing.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
This can be at the component, module, assembly, and subsystem or system level and can be at
site or at the original equipment manufacturer's premises prior to transport to site.
In some cases, fabricating or manufacturing services can be performed by the same company
providing on-site construction services.
Not every manufacturer can or needs to become an AEO. As an indicator, only those that
demonstrate an established capability to provide assurance including technical assurance
through a structured assurance argument that the product they produce complies with the
TfNSW asset management policy and requirements need to be an AEO. This assurance should
demonstrate RAMS, where necessary, and whole-of-life considerations for the associated
TfNSW assets.
Where an AEO provides a sub-system or assembly that has a safety critical function, either in
hardware or software, they need to assure the integrity of those functions through design.
It is possible for an AEO to provide assurance including technical assurance to other, non-AEO
manufacturers or fabricators if it holds the appropriate scope of authorisation. In this case the
AEO takes full accountability for the non-AEO manufacturer's product assurance including
technical assurance. In doing so the AEO will utilise its own authorised manufacturing
knowledge and skills to review the non-AEO manufacturing process and to impose any
additional steps as necessary (for example, deploying additional qualified staff, extra testing
activities, sample checking or review) to satisfy itself and TfNSW that the non-AEO product will
meet TfNSW requirements in full.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of the construction and installation service for assets on behalf of
TfNSW under a contract.
The construction and installation element ensures that assets are delivered against an agreed
design.
Some examples of activities during construction and installation include, but are not limited to
the following:
• site management
• stage works
• construction management
• community relations
• resources management
• quality control
• environmental management
• interface management
• contractor management
• change management
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide subsystem integration of assets in support of the acquire phase of the
TfNSW asset life cycle.
The subsystem integration is done in order to bring the various subsystems together in a
controlled manner and includes the specification of integration tests with input from the
designer.
Some examples of activities during system integration include, but are not limited to the
following:
For additional information regarding systems integration see TS 10507: 2103 AEO Guide to
Systems Integration.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide testing and commissioning of assets in support of the Acquire phase of the
TfNSW asset life cycle.
Testing and commissioning demonstrates that the requirements that have been identified and
defined that satisfy and are traceable to original user needs (demand analysis) defined at the
very beginning of the system life cycle.
Some examples of items during testing and commissioning include, but are not limited to the
following:
For additional information regarding systems integration see TS 10506: 2013 AEO Guide to
Verification and Validation.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of quantifying and documenting conditions of the asset at the
beginning of the contract.
AEOs may provide the service of physical inspection and documentation verification necessary
for the asset survey class registration.
AEOs may provide acceptance services of assets in support of the Acquire phase of the TfNSW
asset life cycle.
Some examples of items to consider during acceptance service include, but are not limited to
the following:
• records of commissioning
• acceptance certificates
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the Notes section.
AEOs may provide the plan asset maintenance service in support of the operate maintain phase
of the TfNSW asset life cycle.
Some examples of activities during plan asset maintenance include, but are not limited to the
following:
• asset maintenance activity plans (routine preventive and corrective) including but not
limited to the following activities:
o measurements
o settings,
o reference documentation
o OEM manuals
o training manuals
o spares
o consumable items
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of maintaining or upgrading the assets in support of the operate
and maintain phase of the TfNSW asset life cycle.
Some examples of activities during plan asset maintenance include, but are not limited to the
following:
• preventive maintenance
• corrective maintenance
• performance reporting
• logistics management
• obsolescence management
• manage regulatory compliance (that is, environmental, heritage, workplace health and
safety and so on)
• plan, manage, build, deliver and accept into service asset upgrades
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of conducting asset condition surveys for assets in support of the
operate and maintain phase of the TfNSW asset life cycle.
• detailed asset condition inspection to determine overall condition, determine remaining life
and enable future maintenance and upgrade strategy and planning
The AEO will be required to define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of planning the sale, decommissioning or disposal for assets in
support of the dispose phase of the TfNSW asset life cycle.
Disposal is not just the decision to no longer use an asset; only at the time when the asset is
removed from the asset register and all accountability for the asset ceases will the asset be
considered as disposed. An asset may be decommissioned but still remain as an asset on the
asset register.
• community considerations
• environmental considerations
• heritage considerations
• retention of record associated with the management of the asset(critical when disposing
through sale or vesting)
• possible reuse
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
AEOs may provide the service of decommissioning or disposing of assets in support of the
dispose phase of the TfNSW asset life cycle.
The AEO should define the exact extent of their service offering in the notes section.
11.1.1. Locomotives
Services related to locomotives.
If the scope of AEO applicant services offering includes the defined in the AEO matrix
disciplines (Signalling Control Systems, Communications, other) and spans onto the on-board
systems or services, or to interfacing with the rolling stock subsystems or services, then scoping
for such authorisation is made by selecting in the matrix the relevant life cycle activity in both –
this section, and also in the relevant discipline. Notes should be used to elaborate.
11.3. Communications
Section 11.3.1 to Section 11.3.11 cover the various services related to communications
engineering.
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include
design, installation and commissioning, and operation of communications cable routes.
Specifically this related to placement of telecommunications cabling, optical fibre and copper,
cable termination, station and building information technology (IT), and communications cabling.
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include
design, installation and commissioning, and operation of telecommunications telephony
services.
Services related to design, installation, and commissioning and operation of CCTV surveillance
systems, alarm and security systems either local systems or network wide.
Services related specifically to design, installation and commissioning and operation of wayside
and condition monitoring systems, telemetry and other associated with trackside heavy and light
rail systems.
Services related to design, installation and commissioning, and operation of local and wide area
network packet switched systems (IP, MPLS and other).
Services related to design, installation and commissioning, and operation of circuit switched
network systems, SDH, DWDM, ATM, ISDN and other.
Services related to design, installation and commissioning, and operation of packet switched
wireless systems, WiFi, 3G (data), 4G, LTE and other.
Services related to design, installation and commissioning, and operation of circuit switched
wireless systems, GSM, GSM-R, 2G, 3G (voice), mobile radio systems, PMR, terrestrial trunked
radio (TETRA), Association of Public Safety Communication Officials (US) (APCO25) and other
radio systems.
Services related to design, installation and commissioning, and operation of network and
information management systems and IT and communications security systems. This sub
discipline relates to any management system associated with communications and IT sub
disciplines. It is not just confined to telecommunications network management systems. Any
system that is not electrical (including electrical supervisory control and data acquisition system
(SCADA)), rail signalling related, or a subsystem of a building management system can be
assumed to be within this communications sub discipline.
• horizontal and vertical alignment design of plain line and special trackwork, including
junctions associated with:
o resignalling projects
o bridge renewals
o turnout renewals
• integrated survey grid (ISG) to map grid of Australia (MGA) alignment conversions
Railway surveying encompasses a broad range of surveying activities from general engineering
and cadastral, to high precision control and monitoring surveys, and to specialised railway
surveying. Railway surveying is focused on providing and managing the spatial information
required for the design and maintenance of rail infrastructure. Some examples of these tasks
include, but are not limited to, surveys for: survey control, track control, track design and
realignment, engineering works for track reconstruction, track monitoring, bridges (over and
under) and tunnels including direct-fix, platform interface issues, track drainage and OHW
issues.
Table 2 describes typical capabilities for different life cycle activities for track and engineering
survey. Note that any other, not listed here activities are not expected to be used for this sub-
discipline:
Table 2 - Typical capabilities for different life cycle activities for track and engineering
survey
The civil discipline scope doesn't include services in relation to building structures such as
station buildings, workshop buildings, at grade and multistorey carparks, electrical substations
and section huts. The civil discipline doesn't include civil works associated with these structures
such as drainage. These structures and associated works are covered by the Stations and
Buildings discipline section.
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include the
following:
• setting-out surveys for construction works (bridges, earthworks, overhead wiring structures
(OHWS), drainage, roadworks, and so on)
11.5.2. Geotechnical
Services related to geotechnical investigations, surveys and assessments as inputs to design,
as well as support prior or post construction, during maintenance and during decommissioning
of civil assets.
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include the
following:
• geotechnical ground investigations including boreholes, test pits, geophysical surveys, soil
and rock sampling, in-situ testing and laboratory testing (soil and rock), geological mapping
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include the
following:
11.5.4. Tunnelling
Services related to road, rail and pedestrian tunnels and associated civil works.
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability related to
aspects of bored and driven tunnels and associated station caverns include the following:
• durability studies
• concept design
• detailed design
Note: Cut and cover tunnels are covered by 'civil – bridges and structures'
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability related to
aspects of bridges and structures rail infrastructure include the following:
• durability studies
11.5.6. Earthworks
Services related to earthworks (railway embankments, railway related formation, railway
cuttings).
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability related to
design and construction of railway embankments, cuttings, and track formation include the
following:
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include the
following:
• services related to all aspects of roads and pavements associated with rail infrastructure
Some of the typical services an AEO would be providing if applying this capability include the
following:
• services related to all aspects of drainage and hydrology associated with rail infrastructure
including, track drainage systems, transverse drainage, scour protection, onsite detention,
pollutant trap devices and dams
• flood studies, catchment area analysis, average recurrence interval estimation, flood level
determination
Note: This area is distinct from civil engineering which deals, in the main, with
non-building assets. Civil assets are of the general types listed in that section,
although it is recognised that some skills will be common. Specific areas of
specialisation should be mentioned in either case.
Services related to external party HV aerial lines that interface with TfNSW assets are also
covered.
o feeder route
• provision of subject matter (SME) assurance for standards and configuration compliance to
TfNSW requirements associated with the external party assets
Services related to external party HV cables that interface with TfNSW assets are also covered.
• AEO services related to this capability include the following services related to insulated
HV and traction power supply cables, including the following:
o cable route
o insulation and electrical requirements, including cable screen bonding, lightning, EMF
and electrical safety
o UGOH transitions
Traction substations are generally located within the rail corridor and contain equipment to
convert 66kV or 33kV ac supply to 1500V dc for the traction network.
Sectioning huts provide sectioning and paralleling of the 1500V OHW system. Both locations
have 1500V dc switchgear and isolating links, auxiliary equipment services and equipment.
• ventilation design
• AS2067 requirements
Distribution substations are locations usually at 11kV containing 11kV switchgear. They vary
from simple padmount locations to dedicated switch room on stations, maintenance centres and
include pole top substations.
• 11kV switch rooms and transformer rooms (usually located on stations, maintenance
centres and so on)
HV protection systems refer to the protection scheme and associated equipment (relays,
voltage transformer (VT),current transformer (CT) and so on) that provide protection to HV
electrical equipment installed in traction substations, HV switching stations, distribution
substations.
Typically this refers to LV systems or supplies for tunnels, stations, workshops and shore
supplies within a train maintenance centre. TfNSW has all facets of low voltage installations.
This discipline also includes photovoltaic (PV) arrays and associated systems.
• 240V lights and power to substation, switching stations, sectioning huts, stations, signalling
systems, maintenance facilities and so on
• IT systems
• UPS
• PV arrays
• earthing systems for distribution and traction substations and electrical installations
• DC bonding to protect against electric shock and isolation to mitigate corrosion due to
electrolysis
o site investigation
The master station connects to remote terminal units (RTU) over a communication network.
RTUs interface to substation equipment and intelligent electronic devices as well as tunnel
pumps and spark gaps.
For work on SCADA communications external to the RTU, it would be expected that appropriate
authorisation is selected in the communications discipline in the engineering services matrix.
• RTUs
• marshalling terminals
Work on the master station is only performed by the supplier and Sydney Trains, so it is
expected that AEOs rarely request this.
• insulation and electrical requirements, including clearances, lightning, electrical safety, and
structure bonding
It also covers provision of network planning and modelling functions (system capacity, load flow
studies and system interconnectivity)
Note: AEO authorisations for this service capability are not issued till further notice.
Currently this work is restricted to the Engineering & Systems Integrity unit within
Sydney Trains. Special permission will be required from the TfNSW to undertake AEO
authorisation for this discipline.
• design, installation and maintenance of navigation systems (for example, radar, forward
looking infrared (FLIR), compass and so on)
• management of system integrations and interface points (for example, propulsion and
engine management systems, multiple displays and so on)
• working with naval architects to design a suitable propulsion system for the type of service
and nature of operational waterway
• working with naval architects to design a suitable propulsion system for the type of service
and nature of operational waterway
• electrical engineering design of power supply and systems for operation of all vessel
electrical services and components
• electrical installation and testing of wiring and components and successful operation of
connected components
• retrofitting new or updated systems and wiring looms into older assets
• identification of hull plate condition (corrosion, porosity) in alloy and steel vessels
• cut, removal, fabrication, shaping and replacement of plate sections in compliance with
class or regulatory requirements for welding qualifications and skills and approved welding
procedures
• design of Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) specified fire safety and
suppression systems for vessels
• testing vessels for electrical potentials at regular intervals and advise on level suitability or
remedial actions required
• working with naval architects to develop and understand a suitable docking plan for the
vessel
• preparing vessels for docking and slipping to achieve correct condition, stability and pitch
• managing docking teams to achieve a safe, stabilised vessel fully withdrawn from the water
• shore up and verification of stability and safety of vessels out of water and suitability to
conduct maintenance works
• management of docking teams to refloat vessels and check vessel integrity at dockside
before releasing vessels for service
• provision of advice to asset owners of likely risks to asset, environment or people resulting
from specialist dive works
• conduct of dive works and provision of detailed written or photographic reports on findings
and results
• capability to conduct required mechanical and repair works and ability to interpret and
resolve discovered issues during works
• specification of suitable paint or coating systems to protect surfaces from the elements or
submersion
• design of EPA compliance, overwater, liquid handling systems with double containment
capability and compliant bunding, valving and flow control systems
• risk analysis and resolution design for safe access to vessels, including gangways, ladders
and other systems
• fabrication, testing and certification of systems including load testing and stress testing
• analysis of structure and design resolution for required seating, restrooms and other
passenger amenities to meet regulatory, DDA and climatic requirements to current
Australian standards
11.9.1. Geotechnical
Provision of professional services for geotechnical assessment and determination for input into
design and maintenance projects.
• advice on issues that could impact structural integrity or compromise EPA requirements
• working with civil engineers to resolve waterside infrastructure issues and facilitate
development
11.9.2. Earthworks
Provision of professional earthwork services in proximity to sensitive environmental zones and
waterways.
• movement of heavy equipment and disposal of material over water, where local land
access is restricted
• measurement of the seafloor around wharves, vessel fairways and fixed assets
• provide descriptions of conditions and make predictions about seabed issues that may
impact assets or services
• conduct of environmental impact studies on seabed and marine life associated with
operational activities
11.9.4. Hardstands
Provision of services for the design, construction and maintenance of hardstand areas.
• design suitable resolution to conduct waterside works and accommodate services and their
access in hardstand
• assessment of load requirements and local waterway conditions and design suitable
mooring equipment
• design bespoke floating structures to meet operational outcomes (for example, navigational
assistance, support of temporary services and so on)
• establishing electrolysis threats to submerged fixed assets design and design suppression
systems
• testing structures for electrical potentials at regular intervals and provide advice on level
suitability or remedial actions required
• survey and provision of evidence of dredging completion in accordance with initial plans
AEO services related to this capability includes designing and maintaining systems designs for
water run-off prevention from shore side into waterways.
11.9.9. Structures
Provision of civil engineering services for the design, construction and maintenance of land
based and fixed structures in the maritime environment.
• design of non-vessel assets to achieve specified functions (for example, dry docks,
slipways, sea walls, wharves, jetties and so on)
• provision of certification for the fit for purpose use of existing structures and loads that are
operationally imposed on them
• provision of computer-aided design (CAD) services for as-built and as-is drawings as
records for service locations and in structure issues
• design of non-vessel assets to achieve specified functions (for example, dry docks,
slipways, sea walls, wharves, jetties and so on)
• provision of certification for the fit for purpose use of existing structures and loads that are
operationally imposed on them
• provision of CAD services for as-built and as-is drawings as records for service locations
and structure issues
• maintenance of electrical and liquid handling services with minimised impacts to vessel
operations
• provision of advice to asset owners of likely risks to assets, environment or people resulting
from specialist dive works
• conduct of dive works and provision of detailed written or photographic reports on findings
and results
• capability to conduct required mechanical and repair works and ability to interpret and
resolve discovered issues during works
11.10.5. Piling
Provision of piling services for the installation, maintenance and removal of timber, plastic and
steel piles at the direction of a civil engineer.
• assessment of condition and integrity of piles and structural components (for example,
head stocks, corbel blocks, beams and so on)
• extracting, replacing and driving piles to embedment depths specified by civil engineers
• operate within EPA requirements for seabed impacts and noise requirements
• assessment of impact loads for fendering requirements and design suitable resolutions
• assessment and design of fuel storage and delivery systems to meet operational
requirements in full compliance with environmental and Australian standards for fuel
facilities
• assessment and design of liquid storage and delivery systems to meet operational
requirements in full compliance with environmental and Australian standards for over water
liquid handling facilities
• equipment maintenance
• working with special projects to monitor and intervene, when required, if breaches are
detected
• ensuring TfNSW supplied systems meet ingress protection ratings for marine environments
• ensuring TfNSW supplied systems meet ingress protection ratings for a marine
environment
• ensuring supplied systems meet ingress protection ratings for marine environment
• designing processes for where, how and when to capture data and by whom
• developing systems for archiving and retrieving data easily including working with
regulators and maintenance practitioners
Relevant entries are selected in the matrix in accordance with the definitions provided in Section
12.1 to Section 12.3.
These are often in the concept stage, for example, modelling, requirements analysis and BCA
compliance.
They may also provide whole-of-life cycle services, such as establishing and managing systems
for configuration management, asset management, safety management and quality
management.
These specialist services could be non-asset specific or have some specialisation in relation to
a particular discipline or asset life cycle stage.
Place an X in the systems engineering and assurance services section of the matrix and in the
notes section use the codes listed in Section 12.2.1 to Section 12.2.10.
This is a specialist service that is normally led by a particular discipline depending on the nature
of the project works.
Place an X in the other professional engineering services section of the matrix and in the notes
section use the codes listed in Section 12.4.1 to Section 12.4.9.