Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manifest Destiny V1
Manifest Destiny V1
Manifest Destiny V1
I. Abstract
The whites are the winning race, not only in North America. It is the tradition in the USA to call
this phenomenon 'Manifest Destiny'. Christians used to believe that Jesus helped the Europeans to
conquer the New World. Others refer to Darwinism and white supremacy. Critics put the blame
on slavery, colonialism and apartheid. But all those ideologies fail to explain the magic of
destiny.
With good reason, the young USA was not based on Puritan ideas of a Christian Calvinist
tyranny. Instead a humane state ideology was established, a mixture of belief in liberty, justice
and human rights as well as in Manifest Destiny. This text looks in great detail at US-American
history, and how the whites won the west, starting with dubious earliest traces of whites in the
Americas.
The text also gives answers to other destiny-related questions. A lot of typical stories, from the
adventures of travellers to famous events of history, from the plots of Hollywood films to
classical Shakespearean plays, helps to understand how destiny works. And this text only begins
when destiny starts to become unexplainable or even unbelievable.
The text also addresses the most basic issues of religion and philosophy. Are we bound for
paradise, or must we fear global catastrophes and more mad terror assaults? Old-time ideologies
present a confusing and often worthless plethora of lores. We find that only a very new way may
really allow us to understand our reality and to foresee our destiny.
II. Overview
III. Main Points and Best Parts IV. A very short Introduction
1. From Religion to Manifest Destiny Many religions, ideologies or groups tell us that destiny
favours them... 1.1 ...but the obvious truth is that destiny favours white power. 1.2 We find the
same structures and recipes in apparently very different religions. 1.3 The bad secret of the Nazi
flag and a short introduction into UTR. 1.4 Topless – all the secrets of the Great Seal of the USA.
1.5 The American Renaissance turned the Washington Mall into a Solar Temple. 1.6 The Bible
could not explain America, but Lady Columbia helped out. 1.7 Shakespeare knew that the whites
have the magic. 1.8 Pilgrim fathers wanted to build a New Israel... 1.9 ...but their sons chose a
more worldly way. 1.10 Only a he-man like Teddy Roosevelt really understood Manifest
Destiny... 1.11 ...but often crooks learned that destiny supported them too. 1.12 Take a new look
at Samuel Adams - the man who made the USA. 1.13 Greed did not turn the USA into a desert,
but into a blooming landscape. 1.14 It's wrong to think that the USA is a land without dukes. 1.15
Ugly and coloured people cannot get pretty and white, but they can get rich. 1.16 Typical
discussion points about Manifest Destiny are summed up here.
2. Weird Movies, weirder Life There are a few movies only who show us not Hollywood
mythology but weird destiny like it really happens. 2.1 The film 'Magnolia' confronts us with they
cynical reality jokes we know from the Bible. 2.2 In the film 'Friends with Money' we encounter
more such weird jokes and mysteries. 2.3 The British film 'Brassed Off' tells us of the mysterious
problems of musicians on the way towards success. 2.4 The film 'Top Gun' tells us how much of
a problem B-class mavericks eventually become. 2.5 The film 'Virgin Suicides' looks at A-class
girls who flirt with 'whales' but end up in a trap of destiny. 2.6 This chapter has nicer stories from
'Star Wars' and other popular films. 2.7 What can we learn from the best opera of all? Love and
patience make good destiny.
3. The Lion King Many people look up to heroes of reality and fantasy. The Lion King is one of
them – not a nice lion, but a man who took the skin from the beast. 3.1 Why destiny wanted
Germans to become the world's first artists. 3.2 Hercules or Ogma the Lion King fought down
lots of beasts – including those of the zodiac. 3.3 The weird Tsavo lions are believed to be
especially ferocious. 3.4 Not only in films like 'Narnia' we find two royal brothers, a fair-haired
and a darker one. 3.5 Bizarre stories exist of a dog king of America 3.6 Is Superman a saviour-
deity or rather his lesser opponent?
4. The Wheel of Fortune This chapter tells stories of the rise and fall of famous conquerors and
men at war. 4.1 The troubles of Macbeth remind us of the story of Julius Cæsar and Brutus. 4.2
Alexander the Great compared to the perverted pope Alexander VI. 4.3 Only when courageous
politicians started to break bad laws, Rome became really big. 4.4 The myth of Jesus and the
three holy kings was just a common destiny myth. 4.5 Constantine and others committed not to
the cross but to the god of war. 4.6 Spaniards were destined to be pioneers only in many regions
of the world. 4.7 There was one blond German diplomat who did his best to get the USA
involved into World War I. 4.8 Why Hitler spoke of Aryans all the time, but then made friends
with the Japs. 4.9 The cold war was making fighters of Germany's most secret command unit
really hotheaded.
5. God on the Road This small chapter tells of the adventures of US-American travellers, who
learned something about religion abroad. 5.1 An American in Australia struggled in vain to
understand his destiny. 5.2 Does it help to obey to the pressure that wants you to climb another
mountain? 5.3 Negroes have their special problems, including religious stupidity that may be
contagious for whites.
6. White Men's Land This largest chapter tells stories of pre-Columbian travellers to the
Americas. Many very unclear finds are diligently discussed. We find that Caucasoid and white
travellers visited the New World early. But they met the strange spell of the continent. 6.1 Did a
Great Ireland exist in the New World? Barry Fell claimed he found traces. 6.2 A look at the bad
Maya religion, but also at the good prophecy of the flying snake. 6.3 This chapter deals with the
degradation of Amerindian skulls and the fate of the Polynesians. 6.4 Why did the Greenlanders
give up the colony Leifsbudir? 6.5 A look at the Kensington runestone and other authentic finds.
6.6 The large Nordic colony in Greenland was exterminated. 6.7 The Welsh fortresses of Madoc
were overrun. 6.8 The descendants of Viracocha, white settlers in Peru, were all killed. 6.9 In pre-
Columbian America Negro migrants were present - at the bottom of society. 6.10 The feat of
Captain Alexander and more true stories from sources of the antiquity. 6.11 Some of the best
forged traces of early seafarers in the Americas are Jewish. 6.12 Mormons did their best to create
some really unreal forged artefacts. 6.13 Seafarers from pre-Celtic Atlantis erected megalithic
buildings in New Hampshire... 6.14 ...but for Egyptians and Phœnicians the Atlantic crossing was
barred by ancient mythology. 6.15 Did the Indios of Ecuador need 'white gods'? Surely those
isolationist experts did. 6.16 This amusing chapter looks at the bizarre tales of Saint Brendan.
6.17 According to Spanish maps North America was some kind of Devil's Island. 6.18 White men
were first in the Americas. But Berk-OS turned Caucasoid types into coloureds. 6.19 Will the
USA remain a white country? We decide, not only destiny.
7. Apocalypse 2012? This chapter looks at our future. Scientists and film makers like to tell tales
of doomsday, but because they know nothing of God. 7.1 Where is the enemy? They try to
control your mind. 7.2 Must we expect more acts of Islamic terrorism? Islam might end soon. 7.3
A closer look at Ga-Musa, one of our enemies from outer space. 7.4 At the origin of astrology we
find the confrontation with the beasts of the zodiac. 7.5 Satanism and Angel-worshipping are
equally dangerous. 7.6 Checking out disaster movies and disasters of the last years we find that
we were not warned. 7.7 Soothsaying works, but only if the future is fractally fixed. 7.8 Are
earthquakes linked to space shuttle flights? Conspiracy theories sometimes help to cover up bad
aspects of destiny. 7.9 A new view on the solar cycle explains many ups and downs of history
and also tells us why we can expect better times for the year 2012.
It is significant that the European neolithic revolution of agriculture stopped somewhere in the
middle of Germany. In regions north of Frankfurt and the German river Main, the more ancient
culture of the hunters and gatherers remained autonomous for a long time. The few archæological
testimonies seem to show relatively well, that the Germanic tribes of Northern Europe did
gradually take over cultural achievements and technologies of agriculture from their new southern
neighbours, but without making way for migrants. Southerners eventually immigrated into
Middle Europe to try and build up farms and settlements. But for instance a large scan of
Bandkeramiker (a prehistoric German peasant culture named after their stripe-adorned pottery)
settlements in the region west of Cologne, carried out by Jens Lüning and colleagues, showed that
the Southerners could not take a stand here. At first they were building houses. Later they were
building clay-walled fortresses. Then they disappeared completely, after having struggled in vain
for 400 years to make the land their own. The Bandkeramiker nevertheless spread from humble
beginnings to a large region in Middle and Eastern Europe. But their pottery was never found in
the North. UTR pundits should know that the Earth Goddess is not fond of pottery and porcelain
because of problems of contamination and poisoning, she prefers glass plates and cups. It's also
an often overseen fact that human remains of European bread eaters show substantially more
traces of diseases and malnutrition than those of fishers, hunters and gatherers. Agriculture can
indeed feed a much larger population, but at a high price.
The Romans then again had to stop their expansion at the rivers Rhine and Main. Many surprising
finds show that the Germans east and north of the Roman Empire took over lots of cultural
achievements from the Romans and Celts. But during very bitter guerilla wars the Germans made
sure that they wanted to stay independent.
And still today, 'Celtic' South Germany and 'Germanic' North Germany are two culturally rather
diverse regions who are more or less separated by the Rhine-Main line. In the South we just find
much more 'Celtic types', more darker and smaller people than in the North, where people
definitely look more Nordic. And also those Southerners in Germany and Austria are traditionally
nearly all Roman Catholics, while by some strange fate north of the Rhine-Main line nearly all
the people have become protestants. South Germany by tradition favours the Christian party
CDU, while in North Germany often a majority votes for the other party, the Social Democrats.
From the point of view of the Earth Goddess, this great religious and political divide was installed
with good reason. She wanted to separate the more Nordic population of North Germany from the
population of South Germany.
If we compare developments in Europe and North America, then we must conclude that the
notion that the white settlers won the land from the Amerindians because they had a superior
technology and a sophisticated culture is not all correct. Destiny could well have worked another
way in the USA. We might well imagine that the Amerindians could have united fast under a
Spanish or French banner to form a nation like Mexico, that they could have taken up some
techniques of agriculture and cattle breeding, that they could have learned how to build stone
houses, corrals and rifles. But all that did not happen. The Amerindians did not grow with the
coming of the white migrants. They did not take over cultural achievements and learn, but they
tumbled and fell to the ground with their culture. One reason for this is surely that the
Amerindians are still today unable to let go their traditional primitive culture. Another reason is
that the Amerindians are by nature far less able and willing to work and to build up a high
culture. If we search for differences between the neolithic revolution in Europe and Manifest
Destiny in the USA, we end up with differences in the quality of humans. Those Amerindians are
just less able and good. And this is why the whites won the west. Destiny wanted white power.
Today many of those Amerindians are nice and try to behave, they have made peace with other
tribes, they care for the environment. Problems plenty still remain in those reservations. But
things were never that nice before the whites poured into the west. Alone on a vast continent
those Amerindians fought out the most cruel and bitter wars, they were constantly stealing and
bullying each others, they diligently tortured to death their prisoners or held them as slaves, they
had little respect for their women. They suffered a lot. Books like 'Lakota Woman' tell us how
badly destiny treats some Amerindians even today. If the Amerindians would try to be honest,
they would surely concede that all looks as if the whites are indeed the people with the better
destiny.
Destiny wanted white Anglo-American power in New England and the USA. Let us think of the
times of the colonial wars between England and France. Those French settlers from the colony of
Quebec and the region of Louisiana had well made friends with the Amerindians. They traded
rifles for furs and also allowed other cultural transfer. For decades some Quebec insurgents and
Amerindian allies waged a nasty small war against New England, until Britain had enough of it
and conquered the colony. France had not been satisfied with the colony of Quebec and all the
west down to Louisiana anyway, and in the end emperor Napoleon traded that huge lump of
territory for just a few places in the Caribbean. It was surprising how fast Lady Luck made the
Anglo-Americans become the masters of this widespread region. We may conclude that destiny
did not well tolerate a mixed French-Amerindian nation in North America. It was significant that
France cared little for it's colony in Quebec and didn't send ships and replacements, while the
British cared a lot for the New World. Earlier already, the English kings had shown much more
will to win the New World than the Dutch or the Swedes or any other European nation had.
Rather soon the Anglo-Americans, who had hardly taken up any Amerindian mercenaries or
friends or servants, were the ones who ruled all the continent.
Those white settlers were Christians. It was the common thinking in the 19th century that
Christianity was leading the whites on the path of victory. Indeed this is what many US-
Americans still think today. They silence their bad conscience with the notion that their conquest
of the west was in some way justified by Christianity. However, if we check out the Bible we find
of course not a word in it about the Americas. There is no justification in Christian traditions for
taking the land. The Jewish Bible tells us that God promised all the world to Abraham and his
Israelite offspring. But later Moses, the scourge of Egypt, this Jewish insurgent, was leading a
flock of Hebræan nomads and runaway slaves into the desert, for to win a small strip of land in
Canaan only. The myth of Eretz Israel, the promised land of Israel, now had replaced the earlier
fantasies of a Jewish planet. Jesus for a change did teach his disciples that they were not of this
world, but would eventually find a new home ground up in the sky. When we read that three
kings visited Jesus in Bethlehem, we find that those allegorical kings represent the three known
continents of the antiquity: Europe, Asia and Africa. But Lady Columbia, representing North
America, did not attend.
So much about the Bible. The simplistic Jewish priests who wrote the books of the Bible did not
understand a lot about this world, and of course they did not know that there were other
continents beyond the Atlantic ocean. Well-read and thoughtful ancient Greeks like the historian
Strabo realized that the vast globe of the Earth was likely to harbour other worlds, continents
inhabited by unknown peoples, see chapter 6.10.2. But in later centuries, stupid Christian monks
again believed that the Earth was flat like a disk with Jerusalem at the centre, with the stars above
fixed to the sky spheres like lamps. The bad aspect of this religion was, that Christians in North
America believe that the Bible justified their undertakings. This was just untrue.
So, when first British settlers set a foot on the New World in Virginia and elsewhere, they asked
God what to do now. Once again, they searched the Bible in vain for answers. Their Biblical old-
time religion could not advise them what to think and what to do now. Should they build missions
and try to baptise the Amerindians, maybe by force? They did not do this. Already Britain had
moved away quite a bit from old-time Christianity and it's mindless fears. The land was there, and
it was ready for loads and loads of white settlers. All the old Christian explanation models had
failed, but that did not bother the settlers. This land was rough but not devilish. Christianity could
not help to explain. Puritans and other early settlers may have still believed that there was a
paradise up in the sky with angels sitting on the tops of clouds and playing their harps. But they
also had a sound sense of what was good and true, and this made them simply scrap the teachings
of Jesus that it is good to be poor, chaste and homeless for the sake of a fantasy afterlife.
Christian Religion was unable to explain the fact that the Americas exist at all. But here the
ideology of Manifest Destiny helped out. This was simply some kind of US-American state
ideology that tried to provide an explanation for the luck and success that those white settlers
experienced. This ideology was especially some kind of justification for the sometimes bad and
evil things that the whites did regarding the natives. It was an ideology that justified the wars
against the Amerindians, and it was an ideology that seemed to promise victory.
The main point of the ideology of Manifest Destiny was not that whites were the better warriors.
The main point was that they were good, doing good things and spreading civilisation and peace.
The whites won the west not because they were the better warriors, but because they were the
better builders. However, here we find soon the detriments of all ideologies. This ideology was
sometimes at odds with reality. The whites were often not really better than the Amerindians. It
was hard to tell why sudden raids on Amerind villages and broken treaties should be justified by
destiny. When the whites slaughtered down the buffalo herds and resettled the Amerindians to the
most barren remote reservations, they were not supported by Manifest Destiny, but they made
bad destiny for the Amerindians. Sometimes it was a genocide. The settlers told themselves that
they were supported by Lady Luck because they were Christians and because they were civilised.
But the truth is that they won the upper hand in this conflict because they were the Anglo-Saxon
whites.
Manifest Destiny did justify injustice, it explained the taking away of land as the will of God. In
those years, everybody realized that the whites were expanding all across the continent of North
America, and not there alone. This white supremacy was just a fact, it was 'manifest'. And also,
the whites of the USA (and Canada too) had a feeling that it was wanted, it was 'destiny'. Even
more than in the USA, in Canada the doctrine of Manifest Destiny lead to the notion that it was
the fate of the Amerindians to give way to the white man in peace, that it was not necessary nor
gentlemanly to take action against them because they would obey and gradually die out, they
would vanish naturally. Surely it was some kind of advantage that Canada still did have royals
while the USA had not. While the Canadians had the notion that Manifest Destiny was making
way for them, the US-Americans were rather making destiny with their own efforts, and ascribed
their successes to Manifest Destiny.
But where was destiny manifest regarding the whites? Many parts of the west were not won by
nice pioneering farmers with the Bible in hand and ready to love their enemies, but by rough
military action of the US cavalry. If we look at the pioneers in the west, we find that good destiny
was often hardly on their side. If we look at the whites and their performance, we find that many
of them were having alcohol problems and problems of social depravity too. At times the west
was the place for the outlaws, where handguns ruled instead of laws. The German pioneer
Friedrich Gerstäcker wrote in his 19th century book about the 'Regulators' of Arkansas, that in
those early days the West had acquired the reputation that all the rabble from the East and the
South had taken refuge in it's trailless woods and swamps from the punishing arm of justice.
The Christian religion of the whites was not better than the nature religions that the Amerindians
followed, but in many aspects it was worse. The Amerindians were right when they sometimes
had the feeling that they should be the ones to teach the whites a better religion. While the 'red
man' was often relatively even with nature, this enabled him to endure hardships and to live
relatively well, without a lot of work. The whites had a tendency to retreat from nature into the
cities, but city life often brought them hard work and a lowly unhealthy life, because of pollution,
bad nutrition and the weaknesses of civilisation.
In chapter 1.1.2 we compared Manifest Destiny to the neolithic revolution in Europe. When
peasant peoples from Minor Asia and the Mediterranean migrated into Europe they introduced
agriculture there. They also came with cultural innovations, with fire pots and millstones. As a
result, the population in Europe multiplied, towns and trade routes and social structures were
created. But that caused lots of avoidable problems. Life had been much better for the hunters and
gatherers in those only sparsely populated but densely forested regions of Europe. This is not my
esoteric belief, but it is proven by hard science. Archæologists know the traces of the neolithic
revolution as they excavate burial sites in Europe. The skulls and bones of earliest peasants look
worse than those of the hunters and gatherers. The peasants especially used to have tooth
problems. It was and is really healthier to eat nuts and acorns and herbs and meat instead of bread
and soup.
So why did the Amerindians lose the struggle against the whites? From a Darwinian point of
view this is rather incomprehensible. We might well say that they were the people who knew
much better how to get along in North America. But we can only understand Manifest Destiny
with Berk-OS in mind. The Amerindians had so many innate detriments. They had acquired a
race problem, they had these coloured genes, and this is why God had to replace them with the
whites.
The challenge for the whites is today to learn anew how to get even with nature. They must learn
to live a healthy and fit life. They must learn to live without the fire pot and the millstone. In the
end, the chosen ones will learn that the life at the side of God is the better and easier life.
After the end of the Civil War the USA developed swiftly. The late 19th century was a period of
time when a few rich people gained an astonishing amount of economic and political powers. But
these 'carpet baggers' and 'robber barons' were often swindlers and men without culture. Mark
Twain called this period of time the 'Gilded Age' , a derogatory term. Twain complained that the
rich people of this period of time made America shine like a gilded façade. But behind this
shining outward appearance bad taste, social injustice and corruption won the upper hand.
Famous in those years became the enterprise Crédit Mobilier because ”it used to buy
congressmen like potato sacks”. Not those elected representatives, but the rich 'robber barons'
who bribed them really decided over big development and investment projects. The USA had
acquired a new layer of nobles. But those rich people were not really noble, they were rather
ignoble, and this shaped the whole society and made it become ignoble too. In +1899 the
economist Thorstein Veblen complained that barbarians were now ruling the nation, industrial
tycoons who had not come to wealth by way of own hard work but by way of cleverly robbing
the assets of others. From the point of view of UTR we may justify such developments a bit with
the notion that the gilded age maybe helped to bring genetically noble clans to top positions, clans
who just were more clever and more lucky than others. Nevertheless, such a robber oligarchy was
regarded as unfair and tyrannical, it left a bad taste in the mouths of many law-abiding citizens.
We may well think that the Civil War lead to shifts in the balance between the North and the
South who were in some aspects not really good for society. The USA became a much more
liberal and open society now, but also lost a great part of it's formerly noble Southern culture. The
age of glamorous barbecues and gilded façades also meant more tyranny and incompetence at the
workplace.
Fifty years later, with the Black Friday of +1929, the gilded age was definitely over. Now misery
ruled, the rich had just driven the nation into it's worst ever economic crisis. Now President
Franklin D. Roosevelt was well advised to take over the political powers again that the
government of the USA had lost to the rich and the robber barons in past decades. Subsequently
the government grew a lot, many new authorities were installed, the US government organized
the Tennessee Valley project and many other development projects in a good way. The policy of
the New Deal in fact meant that the USA became a much bigger and stronger nation, a nation that
provided good jobs for many hungry and unemployed young people. Thus the USA became fit
enough to win World War II. And this time the government policy did not lead to an age of bad
taste and of robber barons, but to more life quality and good spirits for it's people.
Today most of our political and economical theorists have well adapted to the situation that the
rich have again become the replacement nobles. At the stock markets again people make a fortune
by way of hostile takeovers, they profit like 'robber barons' from other people's work. But most
economists don't see a problem here, they think that the rich must naturally decide about
investments, and that our society works fairly good that way. So all the people try to be nice to
rich investors and businessmen, despite of their often poor performance.
Let me just mention here the unique case of the German airship company Cargolifter. With the
help of massive government funds this firm tried to build up a fleet of gigantic cargo airships.
Germany didn't really need them, but they would have been a great help for many remote regions
from Alaska to Siberia to Colombia. The problem was that it was dubious whether under the
conditions of a free market they could ever be profitable. So some investors jumped off the
airships before they were built, the firm went bankrupt. Of course if the German government
would have decided to take over the project then we would be proud today of our cargo airships,
something that no other nation of the world has. People all over the world would just love to see
them. But consulted by liberal economists, the German government decided otherwise. The
largest airship hall of Germany is today a tropical resort, and all those government funds got lost
forever.
How can we explain that nevertheless, economists think that it's good that entrepreneurs rule the
world and decide over investments and development projects? Really, there is a spell that makes
people look up to celebrities and to charismatic 'barons'. Simple people eventually get really weak
as they are facing such sharp dressed he-men at the top. They just believe in people like Richard
Branson, the Virgin boss who built his own private space ships. They then have a tendency to
disregard their own interests and to try and do everything to make the people at the top happy and
lucky. Some such rich people or celebrities make use of this spell to get women laid, or to
unscrupulously rid fans of their money, or to behave like the public bad boys, or to make their
most weird dreams come true. So this is the danger when people look up to persons who are
replacement nobles without being noble on the inside.
Are the rich worthy, do they do good jobs? Where does the money go that the rich people spend?
This money makes everybody work for the rich. The rich want super-sized yachts and splendid
public harbours for them, and luxury villas with fine public roads leading to them, and impressive
public museums for their private art collections. The politicians are wont to nod at their
undertakings. Those ordinary people but should rather want to work for other and better things,
we all should rather want this. We should want better public schools for better children, and
working public transport systems, and public parks who are safe for women and children too.
Ordinary people would want to work for their own interests, for their own homes for instance.
We don't need such a lot of luxury leisure estates in the holiday regions of this planet, but we
need better homes for many poor people. If the rich really were nobles, they should work for such
projects. But many of those rich people work not a lot or not at all, they only let their money
'work'. They don't need public schools nor public transport systems nor public parks nor homes
for the poor, and this is why they are not in favour of building such things. They don't care if
investments make sense for society or not. They are not competent regarding such investments,
they mainly care for their own flukes and whims. The rich people move into expensive estates
that other people have built, and there they have housekeepers and guards and private teachers
and big cars and their private parks, no trespassing allowed. They are no longer a part of the
society that they are supposed to control by their investments.
They rarely can control their own greed and be satisfied when they have enough. They want
another car and another million bucks. They want to own more because they win more power
then. The tendency is that the rich take into possession more and more of the land that once was
there for all. They are wont to say that this is good for competition and therefore good for society.
So should we privatize Central Park in N.Y.C. and charge admission from all who want to take a
walk? The rich people often forget that God has created this world and must help a lot to make it
look agreeable. They often are in favour of Christianity because this is such a silly religion, a
religion that seems to tell all the world how ridiculous the idea is that God might really exist.
From the point of view of the early settlers in New England, this order of society is all but fair.
Those Puritans highly valued personal manual labour, and this made them successful. The
American revolutionaries of +1776 believed that their work did give them ownership rights, and
this is what made them disobey when the rich Englishmen came to demand taxes of them. We
might well say from this point of view that idle rich people should not really be regarded as the
owners of estates that they didn't even help to build and where they only occasionally reside.
Those places could well be shared with other people who earned themselves a fine luxury
holiday. We may well say that the USA has in the end betrayed the ideals of the American
revolution. The freedom dream failed. The expectations of the settlers to get away from the unfair
tyranny of a rich gentry in old England did not come true, since a new rich gentry developed soon
in the USA.
Let us look at the example of the Kauka widow from Germany. Her dead husband had been
someone like the German Disney, he used to make millions in Germany with cartoons and
children's entertainment of a low quality, comparable to Mickey Mouse. She just was his wife,
but now she is in control of his fortune. The company in Germany went bankrupt, and the Kauka
widow lives now in the USA. She spends her money for her luxury villa, for shopping sprees in
New York and for painfully futile beauty treatments. She still dreams of a revival of the deceased
Kauka cartoon characters, but maybe not seriously. Our plans are to rid those rich non-intellectual
widows of the fortunes they didn't earn, and to redistribute those assets to people who know how
to make good use of them. In the new empire of God, we might ask the Kauka widow to give
away the lion's share of her wealth to a new company that then would start in Germany with
quality entertainment for children. But as things are right now, the Kauka widow spends her
money for her daughter's plans, who has become a member of several Indio tribes of the Amazon
river jungle and who fights against development projects there. In some aspects it is good what is
done here, but we fear that those Indios will not accept the message that God wants them to die
out. But while the Kauka daughter floods a few villages of the Indios with money and lets them
have internet computers that those savages don't really need, she diverts the money that German
children once were paying for Kauka cartoons.
We respect the actions of warm-hearted charity ladies. But we think that everyone will agree that
too much money ends up in the coffers of widows who give it away for this or that dubious
purpose. That money should be under societal control. This is what we need the new order of
nobles for. They should be the ones to carry out unpopular decisions too. If you just have charity
money but no political or social powers, then much money that you give away in good intentions
might only end up on the counter of the next drugs and liquor store of some third world shanty
town.
If the rich rule, this means that money is used as a replacement of political powers. But money
alone is too weak. You can't buy everyone you need, and you would not want to make politics
that way. But once again, there are few people who seem to perceive this unfairness of society.
Most people in the countries of the west believe that it is okay and justified that the rich rule, they
want to be rich themselves. In all kinds of societies, there are a few people who are in control,
and most of the rest looks up to them. So can it be that in the end some kind of magical spell
protects this order of society? Must we call it a hierarchy (a holy order) that some people rule and
others must obey? Indeed, such spells do exist, and so does a holy order of our society. The Earth
Goddess needs this holy order of society, for instance if the task is to distribute luck and to make
reality. So again, this is why we need the rich.
Sofia Ewa told me to admit in this chapter 4.8 the fact that
she got very angry with the Jews during World War II. She
who knows alternative realities also knew that she could have
saved Germany from the big catastrophe that evolved. But
she would have needed the Jews to be brighter and more
sensible. If many religious Jews would have conceded in
those years that the Germans are maybe the chosen people
while they are visibly not, then the pressure would not have
mounted so high on the Nazi régime, the pressure that made
those guys crack up and start this insane tyranny. Then it
would have been possible to gradually replace Hitler and the
radicals with more moderate and noble people. But all this
was not possible, because the Jews were unable to admit their
shortcomings, and presented themselves as the most innocent
and nice victims of German subhuman beings. Most older
Jews still share this view today. And yes, it was this religious
Jewish world-conspiracy that naturally turned most of the Jews into tough talking opponents and
competitors of the Germans.
To win the fight in a humane way and to become good, the Nazis would have needed some kind
of true religion, something that was better than the old barbaric Germanic traditions. But let us
also think of Heinrich Himmler, the leader of the SS, who looked like a Japanese half-breed. His
name leads us to the sky (German: Himmel). In fact it would have been possible for the Earth
Goddess to let Christianity go under, the way she allowed it in the times of the French
Revolution. But the alternative in Germany was, to risk it that too many people would have
looked up to the sky in search of a new living god. In pre-revolutionary Beijing they used to have
a main temple where the tiëntsü (Chinese: the Son of the Sky), the 'emperor' of China, prayed to
the sky for advice. The Earth Goddess just didn't want to see such a cult site erected in Berlin,
where Hitler and Himmler and all the Nazis would then pray to the spirit in the sky. But while all
the people in Europe think that Asia is far away and needs not bother us a lot, she also knows
how strongly those coloured Asians indeed influence our emotions and also our religious
intuition. There are just so terribly many coloured Asians on Earth, and they all think so wrongly!
It was another good aspect of the real existing Jewish world-conspiracy that it always kept the
Asians and all the coloureds at bay.
Now this is the oldest reconstruction of a Neanderthal human, and it's also by far the ugliest. It's
strange that for decades, people commonly believed that Neanderthals were such really dumb and
primitive looking creatures, with hanging shoulders. Experts who studied this illustration
concluded that Neanderthals were unable to even make good use of their hands. Only in the fifties
of past century, a surprising discovery was made. More remains of Neanderthals had been found.
Other reconstructions were giving a better picture of a Neanderthal man, still being primitive but
with much better looking arms. Experts now concluded that you could shave Neanderthals and
place them in a New York subway, where they would not attract much attention. So since when
do any sorts of freaks attract much attention in New York? Even Superman flying by wouldn't
make most New Yorkers look up, ha, ha.
But seriously, Leakey writes that the answer to the riddle was that Marcellin Boule, the
Frenchman who had reconstructed the Neanderthal man on this picture, had chosen a specimen
that had been suffering from old age and heavy arthritis. I don't think
that this is a bad coincidence, but we may think that our picture of
the Neanderthals improved with the finds. The Neanderthals had
come a long way down, and when the first fossils of this extinct
species were found they didn't look well. But later that changed just
a bit, when more fossils were found. The reality of such extinct
humans is shifting heavily, and if modern humans just look at their
fossils and try to reconstruct their faces, this helps them, back down
in time.
Leakey again points out that the pre-Neanderthals weren't really
looking that bad 200,000 years ago. Most of those earlier skulls
were looking better than later skulls! The early Neanderthals had
had features who were rather primitive but also a bit modern. But
that period of time ended roughly 70,000 years ago. Only now the
primitive humans of Europe and Eurasia, those white Neanderthals
were starting to look really weird. Leakey writes that only then the
characteristic features of the Neanderthals began to really express.
They then developed those bizarre faces and those hanging
shoulders. This was also the period of time when another harsh ice
age made life in Europe rather unpleasant. It seems that the Earth
Goddess really wanted to get rid now of the Neanderthals. She left
this dirty work to the hostile aliens, to occupy them. The Forces of
Evil did what they always like to do, they killed them all in the end.
But before that time, the hostile aliens were starting to nefariously deform the Neanderthals.
It is obvious that in the 18th and 19th centuries, the movement of the whites into the New World
had become an unstoppable stream. We all know these stories, who tell us about the sufferings
and victories of this young proud nation, the USA, but also of the suffering and the futile
resistance of the Amerindians, who were forced by an inescapable destiny to give way to the
whites, again and again. This was the period of time when Manifest Destiny really gained
momentum. Only with a much sharpened view we may be able to see small ups and down in this
constant and endless trek of white immigrants into the west. At some times all were Christians,
and their thinking was Christian. They then hated and rejected the Amerindians who would not
agree to become dumb Christians too, but stayed with their traditional religions. To replace the
often hostile Amerindians those whites were importing Negroes, because the dumb Negroes were
more ready to accept everything, including slavery and bad religion. But already in +1808 the
import of Negroes was stopped, a landmark decision that helped the whites in America a lot to
remain the dominating race so far.
In such periods of time, when Christianity was strong and seemed to decide history, the pagan
Amerindians were pushed to the edge by the white Christians. In a lot of aspects, the natural
religion of the Amerindians was and is better than Christianity. But it was often seen in history
that the lesser people had the better religion, a religion that did not save them. Not religion but
race decided who would win the upper hand in North America. The USA became a white nation
very soon, with the exception of those slave-holding regions in the South.
There were good times for the Christians, but there also were bad times for them. At first try,
Christian religion would often expand into all the world. Then efforts of the missionaries to
convert or reeducate coloureds of all races would suddenly seem to be successful. But those
Christian times often ended soon, after some decades. The coloureds would learn about the innate
weaknesses of this white religion, it often made them secretly remain with their older religious
traditions. Civilisation and sceptical knowledge replaced barbarian Christian theologism. And
when the coloureds learned, then also the whites could allow themselves to move away from
Christianity a bit. I have the theory that it was also because of the stupid, strong believing
Negroes that Christianity became the leading religion of the USA, and was not replaced by a
somewhat wiser religion. It's just easier to fool Negroes. While those whites would always have
the perspective of a better, wiser religion, Negroes and other coloureds would have to stay with
their old-time religion, knowing that the churches had a place for them but the edifices of the
imperial order of true religion have not. We find that Amerindians are so much bound to their
traditions because there is no place for them in a future world. The same is true for American
Negroes, but here Christianity and also Islam, foolish old-time religions have replaced the role of
the old-time traditions.
Sometimes suddenly Christianity went out of fashion, while the wiser men favoured human rights
and classical education instead. During such a period of a non-Christian trend, black man Othello
suddenly lost his social skills as well as his sexual spell. In such a period of time, suddenly
humans gained a sense for the natural nobleness of blond women and men.
In +1922, Hitler had been a fervent Roman Catholic in Munich, but just a few years later he was
an atheist with Germanic-pagan sympathies in Berlin. If a big man turned away from Christianity
and the Christians, the result was a sudden loss of influence for the representatives of this
religion, and a sudden gain for the reasonable and the humane, the nobles, the right-wingers, the
romantic pagans, often a dangerous mixture. It often depends on the performance of a few big
men whether God is able to control the movement that then is about to begin. And this depends
on who controls the women in the background. Without the presence of the saviour the Earth
Goddess just always depended too much on individual humans.
In +1933, Germany had turned into a country of many who could not believe in Christianity any
more. It was not that Nazis suddenly became so popular with their ideology. But people suddenly
became so aware of all the bloody nonsense that was written in their books of religion. The result
was a massive move against Christians, but even more against the Jews.
We may compare the genocide versus the Jews to that versus the Amerindians. At first, there was
talk in Germany of erecting a state of Israel for the Jews, something that would have served the
interests of all participants. But Manifest Destiny did not allow this. Only in +1938, when during
the so-called Kristallnacht the Jewish synagogues in Germany were destroyed, the Jews learned
that not only Germany, but with Germany also destiny had massively turned against them. This
mainly happened because of the repercussions of the coming of the Messiah. The age of true
religion was looming in the future, and this age did push the Jews into the position of the big
losers, the wrong thinkers. The old aristocracy of Germany had also lost influence massively, and
this reduced a lot the amount of Force that the Earth Goddess had at her disposal. The immediate
result was that the devils lead Germany into the hell of war, a hell that would destroy many Jews
and many Germans alike. The Earth Goddess but soon knew that the time of the Nazis would end,
but that the time of her weakness regarding confrontations and detrimental developments would
last for another 50 years or so, until her new and maybe final paredros would have appeared.
Sofia Ewa always knew that all she needed to secure the future of our two or three planets was a
good man at her side who would speak for her, safe and sound for a lifetime, the message of
truth.
Amerindian culture today has apparently recovered from the downfall of the 19th century. For
centuries drastic measures of the whites had been taken to suppress the culture of the
Amerindians. Even one hundred years ago the total headcount of the Amerindians was constantly
diminishing. But in the fast changing last decades this trend has been stopped and sometimes
even reversed. Amerindians in the USA, in Canada and elsewhere today form a large number of
tribes, some speak of 500 first nations. It has always been regarded as the essence of the principle
of Manifest Destiny that the white man pushes away the red man, that the white man wins the
land that the red man has to surrender. But lately much land has been given to a few tribes. The
'Indians' have built casinos, and also the incomes of fishing, mining and exploitation of natural
resources have turned some of them into wealthy men and women. At official occasions
sometimes Amerindian chiefs are greeted with the respect that people normally preserve for
nobles. So is the trend reversing, are those 'first nations' about to become the new nobles of North
America? Every region and nation has it's nobles, but not always are the people who are greeted
as nobles also those who really hold the power in their hands. Sometimes shady people just like
to push simple people to the front, business people and gangsters who have the idea that they
must fear true religion.
Surely the new trend is due to the new humane policy of the white men. Since the beginning of
the conquest of America, the white settlers tried to uproot the 'Indians' with the help of their
firearms. They killed the buffaloes to let the Amerindian buffalo hunters die of hunger. The
whites chased away the savages to infertile regions and let them die of addictions and social
depravation. Even one hundred years ago the native Americans were drastically re-educated, by
way of legal duress they were forced to give up their traditionally culture. But lately, the
Amerindian culture, like many other so-called 'world cultures', came into fashion. Today the
whites are much less belligerent than before. The white men have changed much more than the
Amerindians have. Many see today the world as a puzzle of many cultures who are all supposed
to fit together. Of course the whites have changed because Christianity is gradually losing this
infantilizing grip on their minds. It was Christianity that made Christians hate non-Christians so
much, and since the latter years of this religion are about to end, not so soon but rather suddenly,
this brings to an end the fervour of Christian duress.
Time marches on, but only some people are ready to follow. While the white man is often ready
to give up his traditions, the Amerindians often hang very much on to their old-time culture. I
would call it significant that Amerindians of today still struggle a lot to preserve their traditions
and to revive lost customs and spirituality. Some rather white Amerindians like the Haida of the
Vancouver region have taken up again their traditional wood carving, and this is the essence of
their movement of cultural renewal. Their traditional artwork is selling well to tourists. It is also
the white influence that has led to this small cultural renewal.
Before the whites arrived at the northern Pacific Coast, the Amerindians there used to work only
primitive wooden sculptures. But when the whites introduced metal tools, and also because of the
cultural contact, those culturally very primitive Caucasoid Amerindians of the Vancouver region
learned how to work more sophisticated totem poles, larger and more colourful totem poles with
more than one floor. We are reminded of the fact that primitive Neanderthals took up a little of
the culture and the artistry of more sophisticated homo sapiens – many thousand years before
they died out.
People who like 'Indian' artwork and culture may see it as a fine development that the
Amerindians find back to their traditions. We may in general see that it's often possible to educate
and promote the whiter and more evolved specimen among the coloured 'first nations', while the
darker and less intelligent people suffer a great loss of self-confidence and fitness only from their
encounters with whites. That's especially true for the small, shallow people with the small heads.
Certainly the decline of Christianity leads to a new religious and cultural renaissance for the
Amerindians. The Navajo in California are again performing religious rituals of their ancestors,
they climb the holy mountains and sit in their traditional sauna huts. The government grants them
access to sites who are off limits for tourists. Of course the white men have only under the
influence of bad religion learned that the Amerindians are equal in principle, and that their rights
must be respected. In the past the whites didn't really play the game fair, but now their sense of
fairness has much increased. But the problem is that some whites also see things completely
different, and much overestimate the value and the quality of Amerindian cultures and peoples.
It's the typical wrong thinking of B-class people. Berk-OS seems to grab their minds now, and
they see the Americas as land that belongs to coloured races, to the C-class people.
So is destiny now in favour of the Amerindians? Is it the trend that they shall win back the land
that once was their own, in some kind of reconquista? The Earth Goddess however sees things
differently. She has her clear objectives. She wants to introduce an overall change in society. She
thinks not that rich people should be rich forever, because their ancestors became wealthy men at
a time long ago. She thinks that the property of owners is not protected forever, but only for a
reasonable time. She thinks that a new fair world government has the right to redistribute land,
rights and legacies anew into the hands of the right stuff, the good people who are fit for the
future. From the point of view of manifest destiny and UTR, we must redefine the word fairness.
It means that it's only fair if lesser people give up land and retreat, when better evolved people
come as new settlers to replace them.
As we check out who is fit for the future, we look at intelligence and fitness, we look at beauty
and size, we look at bright natural colours of the hair and the eyes, we look at cultural quality and
social skills, we look at resistance to mental disturbances and to unwanted inspiration, we look at
the ability to abstain from drugs and indolence. It's not our fault that we must keep up such
criteria. But the situation we are in is critical. We must save our Earth and improve the quality of
humanity in short time. We must see to it that the lesser people vanish, that they die out in peace.
The devils are out there, and right now they try their worst to make our green Earth turn grey, just
the way they look too, by way of a series of cosmic catastrophes.
At the opening ceremony of the winter Olympics in Vancouver in +2010, it seemed that the
Amerindians suddenly were in favour of Manifest Destiny. The chiefs of the local tribes sat in the
honorary lounge, while feathered and costumed dancers of the 'first nations' were beating a big
drum with frozen faces and hopping kiddy-style in the arena. In the absence of British nobles a
Negro woman from Haiti was presiding the opening ceremony, to our amazement we learned that
she was some kind of royal British governor of the whole province – Canada's worst shame, or
was this just a joke? I dunno, it was 3:00 A.M. in the morning local time and I didn't pay much
attention. Meanwhile the audience even greeted the coloured Asian athletes of this planet's worst
rogue nation North Korea with warm applause. Darling of the media was a Negro from Ghana, an
amateurish ski athlete and grinning dumbbell who mockingly was named by the press 'the snow
leopard'. So must we read this ceremony as a sign that the Amerindians are about to regain the
hunting grounds of their forefathers, to part them with funny Negroes now? Is British Columbia
about to become Indian-Haitian Columbia soon? No way. Sometimes things have to get worse
before they can improve. The 'first nations' or tribes of the region appeared as the real hosts of the
Olympics. But in fact they didn't provide for the arenas nor for any of the services. They appeared
at the opening ceremony like actors and got paid with a large sum for this. Shame shame I say,
and surely we would need to change this in the future.
But then again, we are always busy with disaster protection. Shortly before the ceremony, a
Georgian athlete had died – a bad omen. All the time the Chinook kept blowing, the weather was
especially mild for the season. Definitely these winter Olympics had a bad star hanging over the
Canadian city of Vancouver. It's the bad star that we are trying to avoid. But often the alternative
that we have is to let some unpleasant things happen, to let Negroes and Amerindians reap the
fame, or to risk a sudden unfortunate event of larger dimensions. It's a blackmail situation we are
in, also see chapter 7.2.1.
Canada just would need better nobles. Already at the opening of the winter Olympics of Torino in
Italy +2006 we learned that any such big event naturally searches for nobles. In Torino the
organizers had staged comedy actors and dwarfs who had disguised themselves as king and queen
and nobles and then populated the honorary lounge. Well, Torino used to be ill reputed in the past
as this world's capital of Satanism. But we may think that not devil worshippers but organized
crime kingpins controlled these winter Olympics, the way it is typical for Italy. Those genuine
Mafia people see themselves as the heads of society, of course they cannot tolerate real nobles. In
many international organisations as well as in many countries of this planet, the gangsters are so
mighty and well organized that they are a de-facto nobility. But such a shady, twisted nobility is
not well presentable during official celebrations. This opens up the way to the top for Negroes,
comedians and dumbbells, and dwarfs and costumed Amerindians. So this is what a nation gets
who is without nobles.
So we may think that in Vancouver too, the people who really held power in the city decided to
push the Amerindians to the front, together with a few selected Negroes. Twisted destiny often
unites the gangsters and the coloureds and the rich, see chapter 1.11. But we should also think
that Christians suddenly discovered Amerindian culture and traditions, facing the silent challenge
of UTR. In such a situation Negroes and other humans of bad quality are most likely to step into
leading positions, we must take President Barrack Obama as another example. While such token
Negroes are in office they at times do a surprisingly good job, since the hostile aliens are
unusually nice to them. Indeed this means that Manifest Destiny has suddenly turned against the
whites, at least to a certain degree. But this changes nothing much on the long run. But we must
see such an period of instability as unavoidable before the coming up of the age of true religion.
The high times of those coloureds end with the end of their bad old religion.
The age of true religion means that the magic of the white race suddenly soars. This means for
peoples like those of the Amerindian 'first nations', that in the big casino of life they have the
lesser cards in hand. Their social skills and intelligence are not as good as we would need it. Just
listen to their music, something that is often a very significant indicator of God's favour. Some of
those natives eventually beat a simple rhythm with sticks and howl and yowl like wolves, sorry
but that is the truth. Others sing harmonized children's songs, I once bought one of their compact
disks, it was painful. The age of true religion also means that the magic of the coloureds fails
them, the magic that used to protect them from disasters and detrimental developments. But at the
same time, white performers can masterly build on and develop the cultural traditions of the
Amerindians.
Today the traditional culture of the Amerindians is their safe haven, and this is why they stick to
it with such fervour. Many Amerindians perform very poorly in life, unable to lead a decent life
and prone to excesses of alcohol abuse. They cannot well become integral parts of the society and
the culture of the white men. In a way their own traditions, especially their religious beliefs form
a shelter around their reservations. But as the truth of true religion spreads, the religious shelters
of the old times crumble and crash. Not only Christianity will take a downfall soon, but also
pagan Amerindians must then say the last goodbye to the totem spirits and the ghosts of their
ancestors. For the believers it will simply appear as if those spirits who were always guiding them
suddenly cease to exist. And bang goes the groundwork of American culture and self-esteem.
First nations are not likely to survive this.
Many Amerindians cannot react when the spirit of the future visits them, a spirit that sadly only
comes to them to nail the CONDEMNED shingles at the doors of their houses. The whites adapt
much better to a new situation. They too need to change much in the new era. They need to find
their way back to nature. For 2,000 years Christianity has separated the best children of humanity
from their divine mother, so to say. If it comes to the wise guidances of true religion, then some
of the Amerindians can proudly say that they knew much of this before the white man did. They
knew before what whites will have to learn now, they knew how to live in accordance with
nature. Many of the 'Indians' did not accept Christianity, because they had the better religion in
comparison. But it's typical for ages past that those with the better religion also were the ones
with the worse genes.
Already in the age of the Pilgrim Fathers the whites had to learn that their traditional ways were
not good for to live well in the New World. Those Christian fundamentalists had to adapt to
nature a bit, and thence the Amerindians could help and teach them. Later, the whites always
drove, with covered wagons and cars who separated them from the soil. But while the white
humans must learn anew how to walk the footpaths to get grounded and to live a life in
accordance with Mother Nature, they are bound to overtake the Amerindians by foot. Again, the
fact that the Amerindians were first does not turn them into winners. But while the whites are
able to adapt to the new insights of UTR, the Amerindians are not. Their old-time traditions are
not fit for the future, and they cannot leave them alone, because they then fall down mentally. It's
because their traditions define their place in society, while true religion has no permanent place in
life ready for them. There is simply no room for such lesser people in the new New World, they
are asked to retreat and to accept white governance and to finally die out in peace. Many
Amerindians may protest against this. But as they try to adapt to the new times and to really
change their habits they get weak, they stop to care. They rarely ever can design new traditions
who would be fit for a future life outside of the white society. They miss the magic of creativity
that they would need for this modernisation of their traditions. At the core their problem is not so
much bad genes or bad looks, but bad magic.
But all is not over for those Amerindians. A time will come when the old traditions are no longer
the shelter that they used to be, while there are no new traditions in sight to fill the gap. But this
will probably be the time when the 'first nations' will finally dissolve, and when better rests of the
remaining Amerindians will integrate more or less at the bottom of the society of the whites, to
gradually become whites themselves.
So is the USA going down, technology-wise? Doesn't this mean that I must be wrong with the
things I write? No, but let me remind you of something else. Manifest Destiny can change
drastically in a few decades due to the actions and opinions of me, of the paredros. This means
that in just a few years, we should see the trend reverse that used to carry so many lesser Indios
and Chicanos into Mexico and North America. Instead we will see anew a period of time where
Mexico gets much influenced by the USA. We plan a worldwide program of resettlement that
will allow it for the white and rich nations to put the lesser unwanted immigrants to the places
where they belong, and also to resettle lesser racial, ethnic or religious groups from places where
they are a disturbance and a danger to worldwide progress to reservations and camps. We are
talking here about more or less voluntary and socially feasible programs. Nobody will have to
suffer from famine or comparable dangers in the resettlement programs, that's a promise. The
trend of a high level of illegal low quality immigration into the USA will reverse, because we are
determined to reverse this trend. We will make destiny, the way it needs to be done.
For years I was not seeing these problems, but this changed for me, and it will change for
probably all humanity too. I used to rely on the Roman Catholic church for years, and my
activities were centred on attempts to help the churches to initiate reforms. This helped the
Roman Catholic Hispanics to become numerous, back in history. It also helped other Christians
to get influential. This also darkened lots of minds with religious fears and Biblical nonsense.
But since a few years now, this period of time is over. Now I have renewed my program of
religious and political reform. Suddenly a lot of good Force gets transported to the better whites,
but the churches where the little folks and the coloureds used to meet are emptying. We have
taken now tough action to try and reduce fertility and reproductiveness of lesser humans. The
results of this policy are not well visible right now. But we expect a time to come soon, when few
of those lesser people who today push into the big cities of the USA, causing so much crime,
pollution, vandalism and other social problems there, will have children. And this will turn out to
be the best way to make sure that the North America that we all like and need won't become a
coloured nation, or a group of many such nations, or tribes or hordes and gangs again.
Despite of all the troubles and uncertainties of destiny, we are on a good way with the USA,
Canada and other American nations. Looking back into history, we God are proud of the
development of the New World, a development that we greeted with our okay when it began. Not
Jesus but Lady Columbia was leading the whites into the west. Not Jesus, but Lady Liberty still
greets those white settlers in New York. In difficult times we have managed to lead the USA
against it's will into two world wars it needed to win. We also managed to prevent a catastrophic
religious or racial global war.
Today most people have come to their senses, religion-wise; this means that they value human
rights and basic values higher than the old menaces and 'values' of outdated religions. We put our
trust in countries like the USA; and we were right, so far. It was always a risky business to create
a world under circumstances as dire as they are in this sector of the galaxy, a galaxy that is
predominantly inhabited by insectoid low-quality Berks and devilish congeras. But let us not look
up into the sky, let us look at what we have built up here, down on Earth. Here on our often rather
beautiful Earth, all looks as if we have made it. Good destiny is visibly on our side, it is manifest.
7. Apocalypse 2012?
For many people the big question: "How could the terror attacks of 9/11 happen?" is still
unanswered. Destiny always seemed to better protect the USA. This chapter deals with the
dynamics and backgrounds of terror attacks and disasters in the past and in our immediate future.
One important aspect that played a role on 9/11 was that in +2001 we encountered a so-called
solar maximum, a regular peak of the activity of the Sun. This caused a reversal of the magnetic
field of the Sun and a period of instability of the magnetic-gravitational force fields of Jupiter and
the whole Solar System. Hostile aliens, bad and evil congeras, used this period of instability to
intrude with N-rays into the magnetic-gravitational force-shields of planet Earth for an
unprecedented attack.
There are hostile aliens in outer space who regularly modulate
common magneto-gravitational field lines. They direct active
field lines, here so-called N-rays, against us. Common
magnetic field lines are well known by science, we see them
for instance as protuberances, bright hoses who transport
plasma from the Sun into near space. In my other document
'NEMESIS – Terror Rays from Outer Space' I have gathered a
surprising amount of facts and conclusions about these N-
rays, see for the 9/11 incidents chapter 11.1. For instance,
sometimes ionospheric bulges, magnetic holes who reach
through moving clouds or electrical anomalies appear right
above the places where planes crashed or earthquakes
occurred. On this illustration an N-ray bulge was added to the picture of a 9/11 plane crash.
Let me here look at how such regular ups and downs of N-ray activity influence destiny on Earth.
The recent science-fiction shocker '2012' by Roland Emmerich, a film from +2009 that 'predicts'
super-catastrophes for the year +2012, is indeed based on a similar scenario. According to the
film script, a sudden peak of solar activity leads to cataclysmic earthquakes and volcano
eruptions. The film also 'predicts' that hundreds of people may commit suicide, clutched by
doomsday fears. That is not a far-fetched perspective, since +2012 will probably become the year
of the next regular solar maximum. Any large disturbance of our environmental system could
make some of the prophecies of Emmerich come true and lead to a worldwide doomsday panic
and a wave of mass suicides. Read more about Emmerich's script and real doomsday fears in
chapter 7.6.
I have written this chapter in a way that it repeats and explains in the first sub-chapter 7.1.2 in
short the basic doctrines of UTR, to make it intelligible for people too who do not have the time
to occupy with the rest of this long document. This chapter also talks in 7.2.7 about the
'expiration prophecy' of Islam, the day when Islam will officially end. Also discussed are
astrology and soothsaying, Italian Satanism and the prophecies of the Russian doomsday
professor Kopylov, secret projects of the CIA and conspiracy theories. Such exotic and science
fiction material is surprisingly popular, and it is entertaining and eventually helps us to evaluate
what the hostile aliens are planning for the next solar maximum period. In chapter 7.3 I sketch a
profile of Ga-Musa, as an example for one of the evil congeras.
What we really must fear for +2012 is not the end of the long count of the Maya calendar, but a
period of time when the N-rays will be able to better focus on selected minds. In the testimonies
of Islamic terrorists as well as other crackpots or malefactors we sometimes find evidence for the
fact that they were addressed by inner voices. One well-known example is that of the biblical
'prophet' Samuel, who suddenly heard a mystery voice calling him every time he tried to find
sleep. Those voices eventually give clear orders or advice how to commit deeds justified by bad
religion.
It may be relatively easy for most strong believing or mentally disturbed persons to acknowledge
that they occasionally hear such voices. Most other people may know such situations too when
they are tempted, by something that they might call intuition or inner voices, to do things who are
bad, wrathful, vengeful or insane. That's rather normal, and normal people don't do such bad
things then. But the hard part starts when people have to admit that those inner voices are not
coming from spirits or deities or from the inside of their minds, but that they come from real
devils, evil creatures who cleverly manipulate or disturb selected human minds by way of N-rays.
Regarding common disasters of the past years, we find that often they hit hard places of our
planet where Negroes or coloureds live under chaotic conditions. This is true for all of the severe
recent natural disasters. It's true for the +2010 earthquake that hit the Negro poorhouse Haiti, but
not the neighbouring Dominican Republic. It's true for the earthquake in China of +2008 and the
big tsunami of Christmas +2004 that hit Indonesia. It's true for many minor disasters, like the
Katrina hurricane that hit Negro New Orleans or the volcano eruption that forced the
predominantly Negro population to leave the Caribbean island of Montserrat. It's true for hunger
disasters that hit North Korea, and in a way also for the earthquakes that hit Iran, this other worst
rogue nation of our planet. And let me not repeat here those news about drought disasters who hit
Negro Africa in a fairly regular frequency.
A century ago, all those Negro territories were under white control, and that was beneficial for
those poor, socially disabled humans. Subsequently, many Negroes violently struggled to gain
equal rights. But it did them no good that Negro nations were formed and made independent in
the 20th century. Tyranny, slavery or chaotic civil wars were the consequence. Even in
comparably rich and apparently civilised nations like South Africa, many Negroes live under
chaotic and very violent conditions in their territories, while whites face a series of never-ending
robberies, assaults and acts of public unrest. Strong nations like the USA then struggled hard to
help those Negroes in countries like Sudan or Somalia, who only exist on paper but are in reality
torn apart by total anarchy. But trying to help and to just feed all those ever larger hordes of
'skinnies' is a waste of time and money, it even cost the lives of brave white soldiers!
Today many people still pretend that Negroes are in principle as good or bad as other people. But
the facts of history show well that they are not able to control themselves. And with UTR only we
have a chance to make the ignorant and diplomatic world public accept that fact. So for the first
time, we have a chance to end the series of disasters that regularly hit our miserable planet. We
whites must again govern those coloured territories and stop those ill-fated humans from
unwanted reproduction.
I think that it is right now typical that those hostile aliens keep a preparatory crisis on a low level
and prepare a sudden outburst. Like: There was always trouble at a certain trouble spot. It never
got serious, and that makes experts and leaders ignore it at first when suddenly, secretly the
troubles get really bad. This was for instance the case, when suddenly in +2009 Islamic
fundamentalists from Afghanistan and Pakistan were trying to overthrow the Pakistani
government. The Earth Goddess always tries to stop such developments rather late. This means
that it is typical for such a crisis, that the fundamentalists may seem to make dangerous progress.
But suddenly the moment has come to stop them and revert the situation. And then, suddenly the
government seems to wake up, and foreign and national troops unite to fight down the danger.
The times when fundamentalists could bring down whole governments are over, but the partly
demented hostile aliens are not well able to learn such things now.
We must see the whole movement of Islam as a movement that is a constant latent danger for
world peace and global civilisation. This movement gives opportunities to the hostile aliens. This
means that there is always the Islamic scare, not only the scare of Islamic terrorism. Not only the
radicals, but all the Muslims are part of the problem. The broad mental block of Islam, we may
call it the Islamic world conspiracy, gives opportunities to the hostile aliens to turn a small
margin of them into really dangerous tools. Either they try something in Afghanistan, or there is a
new wave of insurgency in Iraq, or a crisis erupts somewhere in Southern Russia, or Muslims in
France force their women again to carry the head-cloth. So what if you didn't hear any bad news
of Islam recently? The danger is there that they are planning something that we don't know.
But the enemy is making mistakes too. Like in Viëtnam, the insurgents in Pakistan tried to
organize troops and fight field battles while they had no real chance to win them. This is due to
the efforts of the hostile aliens, who really like to see field battles and heavy arms in action, and
who are often tired of small war and terror scenarios only. They are out there really like cruel
children who watch us on TV and want to see action in their reality movies. They also like to
watch hostages and tortured prisoners, but at the moment they are not able to control the
perpetrators for a long time, and this is why recently hostage taking has come out of fashion.
The recent insurgency in Pakistan was caused by the fall of the Red Mosque in Islamabad. This
mosque had been a centre of Islamic extremism. Government troops stormed the building, and
hundreds were killed. Of course, government and counter-insurgency troops are also part of the
strategy to drive Islamic communities into the madness of armed uprisings, by way of
unnecessary, ruthless brutality. The networks of radical Islamic propaganda thrive with such
stories who are often left out in the official bulletins of the government, this gives those radicals
the justification to continue with their insurgency policy.
The fall of the Red Mosque was of course special, it was a key conflict between 'reds' and the
majority. While others only see an internal problem of an Islamic country here, UTR pundits but
may think of the genetic programs who are linked to colour genes. The name Red Mosque must
mean that we had here a stronghold of 'reds' inside of the movement of Islam. Those Islamic reds
are similar to reds of other cultures and nations. As they follow their specific genetic and cultural
programs, they may even show the tendency towards atheism that is typical for reds. It is typical
for reds that they have sympathy for B-class people but instinctively reject those people of A-
quality, people with bigger heads and brighter hair, who are in Pakistan typically descendants of
the Indo-Aryan migrants. This means that we do have a sub-racial conflict here in Pakistan that is
well comparable to similar conflicts in other Arab or European countries, where also 'reds' oppose
the governments. It is typical for those reds that they are in tendency unfair and tyrannical, when
they refuse to make way for better evolved humans. But then again, they are more fair regarding
the economic system and the distribution of riches. Those reds don't keep a distance to coloureds
and to mobsters. But they are also people who disobey when it's necessary and who protest
against discrimination. They are typically those whose minds are blocked by ideologies, but then
again this prevents them from becoming cold and desperate egoists who have lost all hope for a
better future. So really, those 'reds' are good for something, and this explains that surprisingly
often they are supported by good manifest destiny too.
Humans with red genes are often more aggressive and dominant than others, and this not rarely
helps them to get to the top positions of society. Here they are the ones who come up with the
revolutionary political programs, or also with the toughest liberal reform programs, designed to
bring the other reds to the top. The reds are often the hardest and most intolerant people, those
who want their subordinates to work hard without talking back. That is a problem especially in
societies who do not have a layer of A-class nobles or influential celebrities at the top who could
exert a moderating and calming influence on society. Then the reds dominate all the political and
ideological groups, and they always escalate the conflicts.
We expect that Islam will vanish in the next decades, but that does not mean that the typical
conflict situations who are caused by 'reds' will vanish too. We expect that after the downfall of
Islam and other religions, political movements of reds will continue to be a danger, but also a
challenge to find to better ways of government. Reds will continue to be a problem, but hopefully
only on the usual low level. We are always well advised to not try and escalate the natural
conflict of the reds versus the better majority by way of unnecessary brutality.
“We were warned”, this is what Mr. Master of Desaster wants to tell us with his film '2012'.
Indeed the Bible warns us of similar disasters. But as we regard our history, we find that destiny
often goes another way. We were not warned when the Christmas Tsunami +2004 struck, and
also the bombings of 9/11 met a totally, suspiciously unexpecting and unprepared nation. My
hope is that with the help of UTR we can get to a more realistic prediction and risk evaluation of
possible future crisis scenarios.
The problem is simply that all the old-time scientists seem to act as silly as sheep. They are
guided by their typical misconceptions, they have their strict mental ways they cannot leave. If
they read my warnings, this does not help them much, since I am not a renowned expert. Alas, it
seems to be typical for old-time scientists that they react with anxieties and megalomania when
they are challenged by dissenting opinions like mine. We should expect them to get cautious and
maybe even humble now, as they lately realize that there is much that speaks against their older
theories, that there is much that they never understood. Instead they get even more convinced that
they are right. The secret unacknowledged fear that the old experts now have is that they may
lose face, massively and shamefully. This makes them struggle hard to stay on the top of their
research field. They are determined to prove now that they are not too old and incompetent, but
most important for the whole world! Just this mental climate in the old-time research institutions
is the ideal breeding-ground for another weird catastrophic theory, a theory that the world or the
USA may go under soon. The old-time experts still have the ears of the press and the government
men. They warn, and all the world listens. And also Roland Emmerich helps them with films like
'2012', whose stills show us people who just stand there stymied, facing flare-ups of super-
volcanoes, submerging cities and flood-waves as high as the Mount Everest. All they can say now
to the old-time experts before they die is: We were warned! So surely the old-time experts who
utter such warnings often are secretly glad that such movies are constantly made.
But isn't there something that we can learn from real disasters, instead of just staring at the scary
diagrams who tell us not much about possible disasters? Let us look for instance at the two
tsunami events who hit South East Asia in the last years. The super-tsunami of Christmas +2004
killed several hundred thousands of people, and it came without a warning. If there was a scientist
who warned of a possible catastrophe of these dimensions, then I have overheard it. The next big
tsunami of September +2009 hit Samoa, again totally unexpectedly. At the same time the whole
region was getting a bit unstable, and earthquakes struck Indonesia again. At the same time,
strong typhoons were raging in South East Asia. What we did experience here was not one big
disaster, but a cluster of several apparently unconnected minor disasters. Old-time experts can
easily explain all this with geological instabilities of the whole Pacific Rim. But UTR speaks of
N-rays here, and N-rays indeed come in in clusters. Many simple people were scared by this
mysterious and totally unforeseen cluster of disasters. The German tabloid BILD-Zeitung titled
on the next day: “This World makes us Angst!” So is the Earth Goddess to blame? It's the
tradition of the simple people to blame the Earth for earthquakes, while the sky is held
responsible for the impact of celestial bodies. But the problem is, that reality is just too
complicated for the simple people.
Simple people are often into old-time religions. They believe in the almighty God of the Bible in
the aspect of the bringer of disasters. Their basic notion regarding catastrophes is the motto of
Roland Emmerich's film '2012': “We were warned!” This is the motto that we already find in the
Biblical book of Jonah. Jonah received orders to go to the city of Nineveh and to warn the people
there before a catastrophe. Also Moses III warned Pharaoh Ai (Eje) to let the Hebræan nomads
go, lest God would send nasty diseases and catastrophes. In the book of Apocalypse, we humans
are warned before a future series of very bad comet impacts.
So are we warned? Must we read films like '2012' as a divine warning? Let's look at our
immediate past. Nobody really expected catastrophes like the cluster of assaults of 9/11or the
Pear Harbour attacks. It seems to be typical for the worst of the recent catastrophes, that the
public and the experts were totally unsuspecting. They were occupied with worrying about
completely different catastrophes, about floodings due to global warming in Europe or a big
earthquake in California. They even ignored clear warnings and turned their backs to the people
who gave them.
From a Christian point of view it is not comprehensible why the almighty God should warn here
but treacherously strike at a completely different corner of the globe. But UTR sees here the
simple strategy of the hostile aliens to start a cluster of well-prepared surprise attacks. Those
surprise attacks are more likely to succeed and raise terror when they hit people who are all
unprepared. The devils relish and consume the feelings of distress, angst and despair that they
eventually cause with such attacks. Our lifeforce is their food.
Regarding the disastrous tsunami of Christmas +2004 we may say from the point of view of
UTR, that this was the last big disaster that was related to the old Polish pope in Rome, John Paul
II. I don't take much of an interest of what is going on in the Vatican. But I heard more than once
that the Earth Goddess has to allow something that we might call 'blackmail with the pope'. The
hostile aliens try to get a strong grip on the pope, and when they lose their grip because the pope
is about to die they let go only for the price of one last big disaster. If the Earth Goddess pays the
price and allows negative developments, then the pope will not have said or written things who
might be dangerous or detrimental for God. The people here in Cologne who persistently and
dangerously harass me are typically Roman Catholics, and bad news from the Vatican would
surely result in a loss of wellness and personal security for me. Also such little mean assaults hit
me typically when I least expect them. I ask Sofia Ewa: “So can't this little man from the Vatican
retire in time?” But she only points to Barsoom as an answer. There is also this blackmail with
planet Barsoom that often plays a role if the Earth Goddess must allow disasters to happen and
old men to stay in office.
By the way, did we receive a warning before the the tsunami of 9/30 +2009 that hit Samoa? In the
internet I found strange gossip from Iceland maybe, that went like this: “A tsunami might hit
Japan in July +2009”. It is maybe correct that this was what the hostile aliens tried out just at
that period of time. But who can say what they really try next month? They are many, and they
always try out this and that disaster plan, and at times they suddenly succeed. Sofia Ewa
sometimes falls into minutes of exhausted sleep, to wake up when she hears the laughter and the
scornful messages of the devils, who then succeeded with causing another bad road accident.
When I started being the Messiah, the total death toll of the German high-speed autobahns was
over 10,000 a year. Now, in the year +2008, it is down to just 5,000. Only such statistics can tell
something about the tremendous success that the Earth Goddess had in the last decade as she tried
to prevent disasters. People who always complain about recent disasters and predict and fear
more and worse disasters, catastrophes and cataclysms, are surely just too stupid to perceive the
overall good tendency of the disaster statistics.