Ferry I.

Sadikin
(ferrysadikin@gmail.com or ferry.imanudin.sadikin@lipi.go.id)

Panitia Penilai Majalah Berkala Ilmiah

(P2MBI)
 (1) Who are we?
(2) Where are we now?
What have we done?
(3) Where are we going?
How will we get there?
What support do we
need?
(1) WHO
ARE WE?
Panitia

P2 Penilai
Majalah
Berkala
MBI Ilmiah
P2MBI tasks and functions are stipulated in

• Menpan’s Decree
128/KEP/M.PAN/9/2004 concerning
Functional Researchers and Their Credit
Points
• Joint Decrees between LIPI Chairman
3719/D/2004 and BKN Chairman
60/2004 concerning Guidelines for the
Implementation of Functional
Researchers and Their Credit Points
• LIPI Chairman’s Decree 01/E/2005
concerning Guidelines for Scientific
Journal Accredition
 Scientific Journal
a periodical publication intended
to disseminate and to further the
progress of science, usually by
reporting new research

Types of Articles
•Letters
•Research Notes
•Articles
•Supplemental Articles
•Review Articles
 Panitia
Types of Articles expected P2 Penilai
Majalah

to be acrredited by P2MBI MBI

Berkala
Ilmiah

Articles*
Usually 5 to 20 pages; Complete descriptions of
current original research findings

Review Articles
Not cover original research but rather accumulate
the results of many different articles* on a
particular topic into a coherent narrative about
the state of the art in that field
(2) Where are
we now?
What have we
done?
Implementation of Journal Accreditation

2006: Journal accreditation process

was initiated
2006-2009: Transition phase
(development process to integrate hi-
quality Indonesian scientific journals)
28 Aug 2009: 165 journals have been
accredited
22 Oct 2009: ISJD (Indonesian
Scientific Journal Database) was
launched
 Evaluation Criteria

# CRITERIA Weight
1. Name of Journal 5
2. Publisher’s Institution 13
3. Board of Editors 12
4. Steadiness of Appearance 9
5. Writing Style 11
6. Substance (Scientific Content) 28
7. Periodical Aspects 10
8. Journal Distribution 5
9. Other Aspects 7
TOTAL 100
 Accredited Journals (Institutions)
# INSTITUTION • %
1 Ministry of Agriculture 23 13.9
2 Indonesian Institute of Sciences 23 13.9
3 Ministry of Industry 11 6.7
4 National Nuclear Energy Agency 10 6.1
5 Ministry of Forestry 10 6.1
6 Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources 10 6.1
7 Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries 10 6.1
8 Agency for Assessment and Application of Technology 8 4.8
9 Ministry of Communications and Informatics 8 4.8
10 Ministry of Culture and Tourism 7 4.2
11 Others 45 27.3
TOTAL 165 100.0
 Accredited Journals (Scientific Fields)
45

40
24.2%
35 22.4% 22.4%

30

25
20 13.3%

15

10

5 4.8% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2%

0
Agricult, Engineer Political Medical
Earth
Vet Sc., and Science Economics Humanity Sc. and Other
Sciences
Enviro Techno and Policy Health
Count 40 37 22 8 7 7 7 37
 Accredited Journals (Cities)
70
60
60
36.4%

50
41
40 24.8%

30 24
20 14.5%
11 13
10 7 5 7.9%
6.7% 4
4.2% 3.0% 2.4%
0
Jkt Bgr Bdg Tgr Yog Mdn Mks Oth
Accredited Journals (Predicate)

B 83 C 53
50.3% 32.1%
A 29
17.6%
Accredited Journals (Language)

Indonesian
153
92.7%

12
7.3%
 (3) Where are we going?

How will we get there?

What support do we need?

Panitia

P2 Penilai
Majalah
Berkala
MBI Ilmiah
 Future Expectations:
Continously improve the evaluation instrument
Integrate Urge editorial boards of accredited journals to
be more concerned with substances (scientific
efforts contents) without ignoring the importance of
both journal management and appearance
with Drive accredited journals to be more focused on
specific fields
journals’
Encourage the publication of on-line journals
editors Recommend hi-quality journals to be published
in two versions (Indo & Eng)
Build and maintain ISJD (Indonesian Scientific
Build and Journal Data Base) at www.jurnal.pdii.lipi.go.id
link Encourage journals to be registered at
international index centers
websites (GO INTERNATIONAL)
 Author
Promoting

Integrity
Peer
Owner Editor Reviewer
in Scientific

Journal

Publications
Reader
Editor responsibilities to authors (1)
• Providing guidelines for preparing and
submitting manuscripts.
• Establishing and enforcing authorship criteria.
• Treating all authors with fairness, courtesy,
objectivity, and honesty.
• Establishing and defining policies on conflicts of
interest.
• Protecting the confidentiality of every author’s work.
• Establishing a system for effective and rapid peer
review.
• Making editorial decisions with reasonable
speed and, when the manuscript is potentially
appropriate for the journal, with input from
peer reviewers who have adequate expertise
to judge the manuscript, and communicating
these decisions to authors in a constructive
and helpful manner.
 Editor responsibilities to authors (2)
• Establishing clear guidelines for authors regarding
acceptable practices for sharing information before and
after publication.
• Establishing a procedure for reconsidering editorial
decisions.
• Describing, implementing, and regularly
reviewing policies for handling ethical issues
and allegations or findings of misconduct by
authors.
• Informing authors of solicited manuscripts
that the submission will be evaluated
according to the journal’s usual procedures or
outlining the decision-making process if it
differs from those procedures.
• Developing mechanisms to ensure timely publication of
accepted manuscripts.
• Clearly communicating all other editorial policies and
standards.
Editor responsibilities to reviewers (1)
• Assigning papers for review appropriate to the
reviewers’ areas of interest and expertise.
• Establishing a process for reviewers to ensure that
they treat the manuscript as a confidential
document and complete the review promptly.
• Informing reviewers that they are not allowed to
make any use of the work described in the
manuscript or take advantage of the knowledge they
gained by reviewing it until it is published.
• Providing reviewers with written, explicit
instructions on the journal’s expectations for the
scope, content, quality, and timeliness of their
reviews to promote thoughtful, fair, constructive,
and informative critique of the submitted work.
Editor responsibilities to reviewers (2)
• Requesting that reviewers identify any potential
conflicts of interest and asking that they recuse
themselves if they cannot provide an unbiased
review.
• Allowing reviewers appropriate time to complete their
reviews.
• Requesting reviews at a frequency that does not
overtax any one reviewer.
• Finding ways to recognize the contribution of
reviewers, for example by publicly thanking
them in the journal, providing letters that
might be used in applications for academic
promotion, offering professional education
credits, or inviting them to serve on the
editorial board of the journal.
Editor responsibilities to readers (1)
• Evaluating all manuscripts considered for
publication to make certain that each
manuscript provides the evidence readers
need to evaluate the authors’ conclusions and
that authors’ conclusions reflect the evidence
provided in the manuscript.
• Providing literature references and author
contact information so that interested readers
may pursue further discourse.
• Identifying individual and group authorship clearly
and developing processes to ensure that authorship
criteria are met to the editors’ knowledge.
Editor responsibilities to readers (2)
• Requiring all authors to review and accept
responsibility for the content of the final draft
of each paper or for those areas to which they
have contributed; this may involve signatures
of all authors or of only the corresponding
author on behalf of all authors.
• Maintaining the journal’s internal integrity
(e.g., correcting errors; clearly identifying and
differentiating types of content such as reports of
original data, opinion pieces such as editorials, letters
to the editor, corrections/errata, retractions,
supplemental data, and promotional material or
advertising; identifying published material with
proper references).
• Disclosing sources (e.g., authorship, journal
ownership, funding).
Editor responsibilities to readers (3)
• Creating mechanisms to determine whether the
journal is providing what readers need and want
(e.g., reader surveys).
• Disclosing all relevant potential conflicts of interest of
those involved in considering a manuscript or
affirming that none exist.
• Providing a mechanism for a further discussion on
the scientific merits of a paper, such as by publishing
letters to the editor, inviting commentaries, or
soliciting other forms of public discourse.
• Explicitly stating journal policies regarding
ethics, embargo, submission and publication
fees, and accessibility of content (what is
freely available vs what is under a subscription
model).
 Editor responsibilities to journal owners
• Conducting peer review of submitted
manuscripts and complying with the
guidelines and procedures of the owner
organization, including any terms specified
in the contract with that organization.
• Making recommendations about improved
evaluation and dissemination of scientific
material.
• Operating the journal in a fiscally
responsible manner.
• Adhering to the agreed-on mission, publication
practices, and schedule.
 Editorial Freedom
To establish and maintain high-
high-quality journal
content (regardless of the scientific field), prior
to accepting a position, editors should:

n receive an explicit, written statement

from the journal’s owner that defines
the editor’s responsibilities and
autonomy.
n be given full responsibility for editorial
decisions on individual manuscripts.
 ISJD
(Indonesian Scientific Journal Database)

www.jurnal.pdii.lipi.go.id
 R
E I
T M
THANX
K A
A H
S I
Panitia

www.jurnal.pdii.lipi.go.id
P2 Penilai
Majalah
Berkala
MBI Ilmiah
Journals of Medical Science and Health
# Name of Journal Publisher Pred.
Buletin Penelitian R&D Center for Health System and
1 A
Sistem Kesehatan Policy, Ministry of Health
Media Penelitian dan
Research & Development Agency for
2 Pengembangan B
Health, Ministry of Health
Kesehatan
Buletin Penelitian Research & Development Agency for
3 B
Kesehatan Health, Ministry of Health
Indonesian Journal of “Dharmais” Cancer Hospital, National
4 B
Cancer Cancer Center
Penelitian Gizi dan R&D Center for Nutrition and Food,
5 B
Makanan Ministry of Health
Association of Indonesian
6 Gizi Indonesia B
Nutritionists (PERSAGI)
Jurnal Ekologi R&D Center for Ecology and Health
7 C
Kesehatan Status, Ministry of Health
 Jurnal Hortikultura
(Journal of Horticulture)

Vol. 18 No. 2 ISSN 0853-7097 Juni 2008

Terakreditasi dengan Predikat B Nomor: 050/Akred-LIPI/P2MBI/03/2008

Jurnal Hortikultura (J. Hort.) memuat artikel primer yang bersumber langsung
pada hasil penelitian hortikultura yang belum pernah dipublikasikan. Jurnal
Hortikultura terbit empat nomor dalam setahun

Penanggung jawab Kepala Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hortikultura

Officially incharge (Director of R&D Center for Horticulture)

Dewan Redaksi Ir. Sabari, M.S. (Pascapanen/Postharvest)

Editorial board Prof. Dr. Ati Srie Duriat (Virologi/Virology)
Dr. Witono Adiyoga, M.S. (Sosial Ekonomi/social economics)
Prof. Dr. Ir. Aziz Azirin Asandhi (Agronomi/Agronomy)
Dr. Ir. Aan A. Daradjat, M.S. (Pemuliaan/Breeding)
Dr. Budi Marwoto (Pemuliaan/Breeding)

Mitra Bestari Dr. Bambang Sunarko

Peer Reviewer Prof. Dr. Bambang Subiyanto, M.Agr.Sc.
Dr. Ir. Endang Tri Margawati, M.Agr.Sc.
Dr. Gono Semiadi
Dr. Ir. M. Ahkam Subroto, M.Appl.Sc.
Prof. Dr. Ir. Roedhy Poerwanto, M.Sc.
Prof. Dr. Subandriyo

Redaksi pelaksana Ria Riati Rahati, Sri Ita Bangun, Ofi Luthfiyah, Suarti Soetadi, M.
Managing editor Adnan Yasin, Sartono

Alamat (Address)
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengemba ngan Hortikultura, Departemen Pertanian RI
Jl. Raya Ragunan 29 A, Pasar Minggu, Jakarta 11540
Telp. (021) 7805768, 7890990, Faks. (021) 7805135
Email: pushor@rad.net.id, pushorti@yahoo.com
Website: www.hortikultura.litbang.deptan.go.id

Isi Jurnal Hortikultura dapat dikutip dengan menyebutkan sumbernya

(Citation is permitted with acknowledgement of the source)
 Berita Biologi 9 (2) August 2008

Berita Biologi is highly grateful to the following

Peer Reviewers (Referees) in this edition

Dr. Didik Widyatmoko

(Indonesian Institute of Sciences)
Prof. Dr. Bambang Satyo Purwoko
(Bogor Institute of Agriculture)
Prof. Dr. Adek Zamrud Adnan
(Andalas University)
Prof. Dr. Chair Rani
(Hasanuddin University)
Dr. Nyoto Santoso
(Assessment and Development Center for Mangrove)
Dr. Deasy Natalia
(Bandung Institute of Technology)
Dr. Ocky Karna Radjasa
(University of Diponegoro)