Professional Documents
Culture Documents
655 Week 10 Notes PDF
655 Week 10 Notes PDF
SECTION CC
COURSE NOTES
WEEK 10
OTHER ROLLOVERS
1
Copyrighted Materials
All book excerpts included in these notes come from the required text for this course:
Byrd & Chens Canadian Tax Principles, 2019-2020 Edition. We gratefully
acknowledge permission from the publisher to use these excerpts.
2
ROLLOVERS UNDER SECTION 85
3
What is a Rollover?
Examples:
1. Incorporation of a business
2. Estate freeze
3. Corporate reorganizations
4
How does a section 85 rollover work?
Assume a sole proprietor has business assets, including land and buildings,
where the current FMV is in excess of the ACB and UCC. If the proprietor
decides to incorporate a company and transfers these assets to the new
incorporation, there is a possibility for significant capital gains and
recapture.
Section 85 permits the vendor to elect (choose) the sales price on the
transfer of most assets to a corporation to be anywhere between FMV and
ACB/UCC
FMV $30,000
ACB $10,000
POD $10,000
ACB 10,000
CG NIL
GENERAL RULES
o ITA 85(1):
- Individual
- Trust
- Corporation
o ITA 85(2):
- Partnership
5
6
Property Eligible to be Transferred - s. 85(1.1)
Cash
7
Property for which s. 85 is of no advantage
Any eligible asset where FMV ≤ tax cost. In these situations section 85
makes the ETP to equal the FMV of the asset, such that s. 85 is not
needed (you can simply sell the asset to the corporation for FMV).
Losses on transfer are deductible for tax purposes, unless the transfer was
to an affiliated corporation.
Consideration
Consideration is the proceeds received by the transferor (i.e., vendor) in return for
the eligible properties transferred to the corporation.
Consideration includes:
Boot is optional
8
Making the Election
Both transferor and transferee must file a joint election, either form T2057
(for an individual/corporation) or T2058 (partnership).
Time limit to file: Earliest date for filing tax returns by the purchaser and
vendor.
Late filing election allowed within 3 years of the due date, but with a
penalty.
The CRA can accept a new or amended election after the 3 year deadline if
it would be “just an equitable.”
9
Establishing the Elected Transfer Price (ETP)
Example:
ETP $10,000
Result:
POD $10,000
10
Range for the ETP:
Examples:
Takeaway:
11
12
Sale of Corporate Assets – Accounts Receivable:
Example:
13
Sale of Depreciable Assets
Example – Machine:
o Cost = $350,000
o UCC = $275,000
o Elected Value = $275,000
Example - Building:
o Cost $500,000
o FMV $600,000
o UCC $300,000
o ETP $600,000
Result:
o Capital gain: $100,000
o Recapture: $200,000
14
o Cost per ITA 13(7)(e):
New UCC
= Old Cost $500,000
Elected Value $600,000
Less: Capital Cost (500,000)
Bump Up $100,000
Inclusion Rate x½ 50,000
New UCC $550,000
Example:
ETP $10,000
Allocation
Consideration FMV of ACB
15
DISPOSITIONS TO AFFILIATED PERSONS (STOP LOSS PROVISIONS)
o The rules for loss denial depends on the type of vendor. We will examine:
o Capital losses:
Corporate vendor
Individual vendor
o Terminal losses
Corporate and individual vendor
16
Capital Losses
Example - Land:
FMV $10,000
ACB $30,000
ETP $10,000
Example - Land:
FMV $10,000
ACB $30,000
ETP $10,000
17
Terminal Losses (depreciable property)
Result:
The rules of section 85 do not apply
Purchaser has UCC: $70,000; CC: $200,000; CCA deemed to have
been previously claimed $130,000
Terminal loss for vendor, $80,000, is denied
The denied loss goes to a separate class and is deemed to be a
depreciable property of the vendor, subject to CCA at 30% (i.e., the
same CCA rate as for the disposed asset)
18
PUC OF SHARES ISSUED – ITA 85(2.1):
When shares are issued under a s. 85 rollover, the LSC of the newly
issued shares is almost always reduced either by 85(2.1) or 84.1 (covered
later).
FMV $30,000
ACB $10,000
ETP $10,000
Consideration:
LSC $24,000
Debt $ 6,000
LSC $24,000
1 Note: If more than one class of shares are issued, the PUC reduction is prorated
on the basis of the fair market value of the shares.
19
GIFT TO RELATED PERSON – ITA 85(1)(e.2)
2) ETP
1. POD, and
ACB $10,000
ETP $10,000
Consideration:
Preferred shares with a LSC $10,000
20
Required: Determine the tax implications.
Benefit:
FMV of land $60,000
Less greater of:
FMV of consideration $10,000
ETP $10,000 10,000
Excess (Gift) $50,000
POD:
ETP $10,000
+ Gift 50,000
Deemed ETP (POD) $60,000
Less: ACB of land 10,000
Capital gain $50,000
21
PUC of shares received:
LSC $10,000
22
EXCESS CONSIDERATION RECEIVED
In the previous example, the shareholder took less out of the company than
he transferred in (gift situation).
What would happen if he took out more from the company than he put in?
23
Takeaway: When transferring assets to a corporation ensure that the FMV of the
consideration received is not in excess of the FMV of the asset transferred to the
corporation.
24
SALE OF SHARES TO A RELATED CORP.- CG CRYSTALLIZATION
Example:
FMV $950,000
ACB $100,000
PUC $100,000
The individual believes the ITA might be amended in the near future to
eliminate the CGD. The individual previously used $266,912 of the CGD,
and now wishes to crystallize the remaining $600,000.
25
(CG Crystallization – continued)
Capital gain:
Less:
Greater of:
o PUC of shares transferred: $100,000
o ACB of shares transferred: $100,000 $100,000
LSC $950,000
Less PUC reduction, per above 850,000
PUC of Holdco’s shares for tax purposes $100,000
26
SALE OF SHARES TO A RELATED CORPATION
Example: Shares sold to a related corp. and boot received by the shareholder.
FMV $950,000
ACB $100,000
PUC $100,000
27
The individual believes the ITA might be amended in the near future to
eliminate the CGD. The individual previously used $266,912 of the CGD,
and now wishes to crystallize the remaining $600,000.
The individual would like to take out $500,000 cash from his company, not
as a taxable dividend but rather as a capital gain.
Consideration received -
Shares of Holdco:
FMV and LSC: $450,000
Cash: $500,000
Note: Whenever boot is received when shares are sold to a related corporation that
are connected, you must check for an 84.1(1)(b) deemed dividend.
28
PUC of Holdco shares:
Plus:
PUC reduction under 84.1(1)(a)
(see below) 450,000 550,000
29
Capital Gain or Capital Loss on disposal of Opco shares:
ETP $700,000
Less: 84.1(1)(b) Deemed dividend 400,000
Deemed POD $300,000
ETP $700,000
Less: Amount allocated to boot 500,000
ACB of Holdco shares received $200,000
Takeaway:
Boot received is > (PUC or ACB of the shares sold) = Deemed dividend
3. The individual and the purchaser corporation are not at arm’s length,
and
4. The subject corporation (the shares of the corporation whose shares are sold)
must be connected (i.e., > 10% ownership or control) to the purchaser
corporation after the transfer.
30
Section 85 rollover
31
CFE Question concerning s. 85(1) Rollover
Issues:
Candidate should give basic details of the s. 85(1) rollover, such as:
2. Form T2057 must be filed and agreed to by both the purchaser and vendor.
Planning:
1. Consider using an ETP higher than cost in cases where you can use the
CGD, or have unutilized losses.
32
CAPITAL GAINS STRIPPING ITA 55(2)
2. The dividend significantly reduced the capital gain on the disposition of the
shares,
and
3. The sale of the shares by the corporation was to an arm’s length party.
33
EXAMPLE:
Lor Inc. currently owns Lee Ltd. An arm’s length purchaser has made an offer for
$800,000 to buy the shares of Lee Ltd. In order to reduce the amount of the CG,
the following plan was carried out.
Step 3: Lor Inc. sells the shares of Lee Ltd to the purchaser for $200,000
POD $200,000
Add dividend received 600,000
Revised POD $800,000
ACB (200,000)
Revised CG $600,000
34
Tax Planning:
Under ITA 55(5)(f) the corporation receiving the dividend (Lor Inc. in our case)
can designate the dividend received to be more than just one dividend.
In our example, Lor Inc. would designate that it received two separate dividends, as
follows:
Dividend of $250,000 (equal to save income)
Dividend of $350,000 (to be added to POD)
Note that the “safe income” amount (Retained Earnings after 1971 computed on a
tax basis) will remain as a dividend.
By designating that 2 dividends were received, the CG realized by Lor Inc. was
reduced from $600,000 to $350,000.
35
SECTION 85 PROBLEM
Mr. Rollover, a client, indicates that he wishes to incorporate early in 2019 his sole
proprietorship which he carried on as an active business in Ontario.
The assets and liabilities of the sole proprietorship, as at December 31, 2019, are listed below:
Additional Information:
(1) The prepaids have not been written off for tax purposes.
(3) The following information relates to the fixed assets as at January 1, 2019:
Undepreciated Capital
capital cost cost
Land ................................................................. — $ 25,000
Building……………………………………… $100,000 110,000
Equipment…………………………………… 60,000 100,000
(4) Mr. Rollover has $22,500 of net capital losses which arose in 1997 and which he would
like to use.
36
Required:
(A) Concerning Mr. Rollover’s transfer of assets to his new corporation, explain:
(i) Which assets which should not be transferred to the corporation, and
(ii) Which assets should be transferred to the corporation, but cannot are should not be
transferred under subsection 85(1), .and provide the amount and type of
consideration that should be received for each asset.
(B) For assets which should be transferred to the corporation using s. 85(1), take back the
maximum debt for each asset (to the nearest $100) without causing an increase in his
taxable income. Also, Mr. Rollover wants the new corporation to assume the liabilities
of the sole proprietorship.
(C) (i) Determine the cost of the consideration received from the corporation.
(ii) What would be the tax consequences if the shares of the newly created corporation
are sold to an arm’s length party for their fair market value shortly after the subsection
85(1) rollover?
(D) (i) Determine the paid-up capital for tax purposes of the shares received from the
corporation.
(ii) What would be the tax consequences if the shares are redeemed by the corporation for
their fair market value shortly after the subsection 85(1) rollover?
37
SECTION 85 SOLUTION
Accounts receivable If use section 85, will have a $2,000 capital loss which will
be denied. If s. 22 is used, the $2,000 is deductible as a
business loss and is not denied. Transfer for $4,000 debt
consideration.
38
(C) (i) Elected transfer
price
.............................................................................................................................................. $ 155,001
Allocation of A.C.B. to debt consideration:
Debt assumed $ 30,000
New debt issued 125,000 (155,000)
A.C.B. of shares $ 1
― NOTES TO SOLUTION
(1) The capital cost of the building to the corporation will be the original capital cost of
$110,000.
(2) Subsection 13(21.2) applies to deny the unrealized terminal loss where the transferor is
an individual and the asset is transferred to an affiliated person. The capital cost addition
to U.C.C. to the corporation will be $40,000. Mr. Rollover will have a notional asset of
$20,000, equal to the amount of the terminal loss. CCA can be claimed on the $20,000 at
the same rate as the equipment class.
(3) The elected amount of the land was increased by $30,000, so that net capital losses of
$15,000 could be fully utilized ($22,500 x 4/3 = $30,000 x ½ = $15,000).
39
CFE CASE
The following is the suggested answer to a question which required the use of s. 85(1).
This question was asked when the Tax Elective Role required a “B” level. As it is now
a “C” level, Elective Role candidates need only understand the discussion below, in
particular the highlighted areas.
Suggested Solution:
40
Section 85(1) Solution - continued
41
OTHER ROLLOVERS
Byrd & Chen: Chapter 17
42
85.1 SHARE FOR SHARE EXCHANGES
Note: As there is nothing in the 2019 CPA Competency Map which refers to
Section 85.1, it should not be tested on the CFE, and you can ignore pages
46-48 of these notes.
Instead of paying cash for the acquisition, newly issued shares of the
purchaser are used
Example:
Results:
43
Summary of Results
2. ACB and PUC of shares sold roll over to new shares received
44
Conditions for 85.1 to Apply:
No election is required
If the vendor does not want to take advantage of the rollover, they need
only declare the gain or loss on the sale, or file a section 85(1) rollover
Tax Planning:
The vendor may choose not to take advantage of the rollover by including
the gain or loss resulting from the disposition in his/her tax return for the
year of the exchange (to take advantage of the CGD, or unused losses).
45
SEC 86 REORGANIZATION OF SHARE CAPITAL
When is it used?
How is it accomplished?
It involves the exchange of all the shares of a particular class owned by a
taxpayer for another class of newly issued shares, and sometimes boot is
included
Typical example is the exchange all of a person’s common shares for
preferred shares.
46
ITA 86(1) Procedures
Note:
Will have an 84(3) deemed dividend if boot is > PUC of old shares
Could also have a capital gain or a capital loss on the disposition of the old
shares
47
Example: Estate Freeze, No Gift
48
Takeaway for CFE: Reorganization of Capital
49
PLANNING: KEY EMPLOYEE SUCCESSIONS
Key employee might not have sufficient funds for the purchase
The above freeze transaction can be carried out, with the key employee
acquiring the new common shares and the owner/manager exchanging their
old common shares for new preferred shares
50
ITA 86(2) Benefit Rule (Review only if tax is your elective role)
Tax consequences:
i. Proceeds of disposition:
Lesser of:
o FMV of Boot + Gift amount
o FMV of old shares
51
Example: Estate Freeze, With Gift
52
AMALGAMATIONS – ITA 87
3. All assets, liabilities, and tax accounts including any loss carryovers are
transferred on a rollover basis to the new corporation.
53
Detailed explanation:
The predecessor corporations are deemed to have a year end the day before
the amalgamation.
This may give rise to a short year, meaning certain items have to be
prorated, such as CCA and the SBD. It also counts as a year for purposes
of the loss carry forwards.
54
Tax implications for the new amalgamated corporation
Asset values, losses, and the tax accounts of the predecessor corporations
flow through to the new corporation, as follows:
The tax year begins the day of the amalgamation, and the new corporation
can choose its year end.
55
Vertical Amalgamations
In cases where the parent company owns 100% of the subsidiary, certain
assets of the subsidiary can be bumped by a total of $350,000.
56
WINDING UP OF A CANADIAN CORPORATION – ITA 88
After winding up, a corporation ceases to exist as a separate legal entity and
obtains a certificate of dissolution from the government (i.e. it surrenders its
charter).
- All debts, payables, including income taxes, have been paid (or
creditors have given consent to dissolution if corporation did not
have sufficient funds)
- All remaining property after paying off the above is distributed to the
shareholders.
57
There are two types of wind-ups
ITA 88(1): Wind-up of a ≥ 90% owned subsidiary into its parent. 88(1) is a
rollover provision.
ITA 88(2): Wind-up of all other corporations (e.g.: Corporations owned <
90% by parent, or corporations owned by individuals). 88(2) is
not a rollover provision.
There is no reference in the 2019 CPA Competency Map for Section 88(1) Wind-
Ups. Therefore you don’t need to know pages 61-66.
1. All assets, liabilities, and tax accounts, including any loss carryovers, are
transferred on a rollover basis to the parent corporation.
58
Detailed rules:
Inventory ----------------------------------->
Tax Value
Non-Depreciable Capital Property-------> ACB
Depreciable Capital Property ------------>UCC
Debts ---------------------------------------->
Amount of Debts
Reserve ------------------------------------->
Amount of reserve
GRIP of CCPC ---------------------------->Flows thru to CCPC
parent
LRIP of non-CCPC -----------------------> Flows thru to non-CCPC
parent
59
2. ACQUISITION OF ASSETS BY PARENT
Parent is deemed to have disposed of its shares in the subsidiary for the
following proceeds:
Greater of:
i. Lesser of:
60
4. ASSET BUMP-UP
Example
If the above amounts were reversed; with the potential bump being
$1,000,000 while the excess of the FMV over the cost of the assets was
$650,000, the unused bump of $350,000 would be lost.
61
YEAR-END
All losses are transferred to the parent and can be utilized starting in the
first taxation year of the parent after the wind-up
For carry forward purposes, if a subsidiary had a different year end than
the parent, the subsidiary’s losses are deemed to have occurred in the
parent's year that includes the subsidiary’s year end
Example
If a parent’s fiscal year begins on February 1 and the winding-up
commences on February 15, 2019, the losses of the subsidiary will not be
available to the parent until its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2020.
2) The parent must own at least 90% of each class of shares of the subsidiary
before the wind-up.
62
COMPARISON – AMALGAMATION VS 88(1) WIND-UP
63
ITA 88(2) WINDING-UP OF A CANADIAN CORPORATION
After a corporation has sold all of its assets, and the corporation’s
remaining funds are distributed to the shareholder(s), the rules of ITA
88(2) are used. Commonly, this occurs when the shareholder/owner
decides to retire.
64
4. The cash available after the liquidation of all assets, less the liabilities and
taxes, is used to redeem its shares. Example:
POD $30
Note:
The CG will not be eligible for the CGD as the corporation will not
qualify as a QSBC at the time of wind-up
65
Example taken from “Introduction to Federal Income Taxation in Canada” (Beam,
Laiken, et al)
66
Solution
2. Identify the relationships among the stakeholders, e.g., related, affiliated, associated, connected
Mr. Prasad owns 100% of the company so they are related and affiliated
Planning to sell the assets of JTL in January 2020 and wind up the company
He is in the top tax bracket in 2019 and 2020
In 2021 and later years he expects his income to be approximately $100,000
3. Identify the profile of each stakeholder, e.g., tax features, risk profile
67
Mr. Prasad
An individual resident in Canada (since JTL is a CCPC)
J. Tilkenhurst Ltd.
CCPC (given)
Purchaser
A corporation
4. Understand the decision maker and their objectives
Mr. Prasad wants to retire
He wants the company to sell its assets and wind up JTL
Wants to determine how much capital he has to invest if he winds up JTL
He wants to know whether he should wind up JTL or keep it
5. Identify the relevant past transaction/events or planned future transactions/events and create a timeline
Mr. Prasad purchased the shares 10 years ago
He wants the company to sell its assets and wind up in January 2020
Planning transaction
68
Analyze the Issues
1. Identify and perform the qualitative analysis of the transactions and plans including an analysis of the
applicable provisions of the Act
Tax treatment of asset sale
The sale of assets will result in:
o Dispositions of the properties sold for tax purposes.
o Taxable income in JTL
o Possible additions to the CDA and non-eligible RDTOH
o Liabilities, including income tax, paid
o After-tax cash in the corporation available for distribution to Mr. Prasad
Tax treatment of a wind up of JTL
If JTL is to be “wound up” so s. 84(2) applies
o While s. 88(2) does apply, the assets have already been sold so there are no assets remaining to be
deemed to be disposed of; the only asset is cash. 88(2) applies to a Canadian corporation where all
or substantially of the property owned is distributed to the shareholders on wind up.
o Consequences of wind up – The shares will disappear along with the company. As a result the
wind up is treated like a redemption since the funds are coming from the company to Mr. Prasad.
Therefore, calculate
Deemed dividend [84(2)]
Capital gain or loss [84(9)]
Pros and cons of retaining JTL
If JTL is NOT to be wound up
o The PUC and CDA can still be paid out tax free
o The dividend refund is not received but future dividends can be paid to generate a dividend refund.
Dividends can be paid out over time at lower tax rates.
o Investment income earned in a corporation is taxed at the highest tax rate and there is a tax cost to
earning investment income in a corporation.
o Avoids immediate tax on the deemed dividend on wind up under 84(2)
o More difficult to access funds held in a corporation.
If JTL is wound up
o Mr Prasad no longer has ongoing filing and administrative costs associated with having a
corporation.
o Funds from the corporation can be invested personally and taxed at lower marginal tax rates or
could be invested in an RRSP or TFSA where investment income is not taxed.
o Significant deemed dividend on wind up will be taxed at highest marginal tax rate of 42.5%.
69
2. Identify and complete the supporting quantitative analysis of the transactions and plans using an appropriate
analysis format
Sale of Assets
Calculate the tax cost of selling all the assets of the company and the after-tax corporate cash available for distribution
if the JTL is wound up.
70
Wind up the Company
Compare the after-tax cash available to invest if JTL is wound up (Option A) to the after-tax cash available if the
company is retained (Options B & C). If the company is retained the PUC and CDA can be distributed tax free to
provide some personal funds for Mr. Prasad to invest (Option B). If the company is retained, it would also be possible
to pay a non-eligible dividend of $85,871 to receive a refund of the company’s non-eligible RDTOH balance of
$32,917 at a low tax cost of $3,578.
71
Option A Option B Option C
Asset Sale Asset Sale Asset Sale
Wind Up No Wind Up No Wind Up
Individual Mr P Mr P Mr P
Cash Received on Wind up 537,054
PUC Distribution Rec'd 18,000 18,000
Capital Dividend Rec'd 99,774 99,774
Taxable Dividend Rec'd - 85,871
Tax on Dividend (178,194) (36,495)
Available to Invest 358,860 117,774 167,150
3. Identify any risks including missing information, assumptions and uncertain research positions
None identified
4. Reach a conclusion on each issue
a. If Mr. Prasad sells the assets for the amounts specified and subsequently winds up the company he will have
personal after-tax cash of $358,860 to invest personally.
b. If he does not wind up the company, JTL will have $504,137 (before the dividend refund) available to invest.
c. If he does not wind up the company
He will be able to withdraw the PUC ($18,000) and CDA ($99,774) tax free.
Between the corporation and Mr. Prasad they will have a total of $504,137 available to invest.
He will also be able to access the $32,917 of non-eligible RDTOH on the payment of a dividend of
$85,871. Since his personal tax rate on this non eligible dividend of 42.5% is greater than the dividend
refund rate of 38 ⅓% he should wait until he is in a lower personal tax bracket before paying this
dividend
He will be able to defer the personal tax of $178,194 on the winding-up dividend.
5. Evaluate the strengths/weaknesses/risks of your conclusions
No weaknesses identified
72
Advise/Recommend
Advise the decision maker, integrating your conclusions on each of the issues with their objectives, giving priority to
the most important issues
Do not wind up
Pay out the PUC and CDA and invest in a TFSA or RRSP
Pay a dividend to generate the dividend refund when he is in a lower tax bracket
—NOTES TO SOLUTION
(1) Accounts receivable:
Inclusion of last year’s reserve (active business income) ............................................................ $ 5,000
Proceeds of disposition* ............................................................................................................. 52,000
Cost ............................................................................................................................................. (60,000)
Capital loss .................................................................................................................................. (8,000)
Allowable capital loss ( /2 $8,000) ...........................................................................................
1 (4,000)
Capital dividend account ( /2 $8,000) ......................................................................................
1 $ (4,000)
* The disposition does not qualify for the section 22 election, since the accounts receivable were sold to a factoring
company and, hence, the disposition does not meet the “all or substantially all” and “carrying on the business” tests.
(2) Inventory:
Proceeds ...................................................................................................................................... $ 127,000
Cost ............................................................................................................................................. (110,000)
$ 17,000
(3) Land:
Proceeds of disposition ............................................................................................................... $ 150,000
Cost ............................................................................................................................................. (85,000)
Capital gain ................................................................................................................................. $ 65,000
Taxable capital gain .................................................................................................................... $ 32,500
Capital dividend account (1/2 $65,000) .................................................................................... $ 32,500
(4) Building:
UCC ............................................................................................................................................ $ 23,000
LOCP .......................................................................................................................................... (66,000)
Recapture .................................................................................................................................... $ 43,000
73
(5) Equipment:
UCC ............................................................................................................................................ $ 10,000
Less: lower of cost or proceeds ................................................................................................... 6,000
Terminal loss ............................................................................................................................... $ (4,000)
(8) Tax @ 13% on active business income (13% of $72,239) .......................................................... $ 9,391
2 2
Tax @ 50 /3% on investment income (50 /3% of $87,774) ......................................................... 44,472
Total tax ...................................................................................................................................... $ 53,863
(9) Refundable Part I Tax(302/3% of $87,774).................................................................................. $ 26,917
74
CONVERTIBLE PROPERTIES – ITA 51
The Basics:
Rules:
No boot allowed
75
SALE OF INCORPORATED BUSINESS
76
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – ITA 56.4(2) and (3)
Tax treatment: The general rule is that the amount received for agreeing
to a restrictive covenant is 100% included in “other” income (ITA
56.4(2)).
o Sale of Assets: When assets are being sold, the restrictive covenant
amount can be treated as an acquisition of a Class 14.1 asset by the
payor, and as Class 14.1 proceeds of disposition by the recipient (the
vendor and purchaser must jointly elect). Advantage: If the vendor
doesn’t have a
Class 14.1 balance, ½ of the proceeds is included in income as a
capital gain.
o Sale of Shares: If shares are sold, the restrictive amount can be added
to the proceeds of disposition of the shares, if the vendor and
purchaser jointly elect. Advantage: Only ½ of the proceeds is
included in income as a capital gain.
77
PURCHASE AND SALE OF ASSETS VS SHARES
SALE OF ASSETS
1. If the assets are sold and the company is liquidated, the tax results are similar
to an 88(2) wind-up (i.e., deemed dividend and capital gain/loss).
2. In order to defer the tax on the dividend and capital gain, the company might
not be liquidated and instead the company:
3. If the company is to be liquidated it might choose to pay out the assets over
several years to lessen the tax bite of the shareholders.
SALE OF SHARES
1. POD – ACB = CG or CL
78
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
79
Conclusion re sell assets or sell shares
4. If the purchaser wishes to obtain the vendor’s non-capital losses, then the
shares must be purchased.
b) CDA: Tax free dividends could no longer be paid tax free out of the CDA.
Therefore, prior to the sale of the company, capital dividends should be paid
to the shareholders.
c) RDTOH: The refundable taxes will be lost, so taxable dividends equal to the
RDTOH ÷ .3833 should be paid out prior to the sale.
b) CDA: The Corporation will maintain the CDA, but dividends paid out to
non-residents will be subject to Canadian withholding tax (25% unless the
rate is reduced by a tax treaty). Therefore, prior to the sale of the company,
capital dividends should be paid to the Canadian shareholders.
80