Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neita Recommendations of Accessibility Features
Neita Recommendations of Accessibility Features
Assignment two
Submitted by
Submitted on
Table of Content
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………..………… 3
Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………..14
References ……………………………………………………………………………………....15
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 3
Introduction
Learning Management System (LMS), Learning Content Management System (LCMS) and
Content Management System (CMS) facilitates the delivery of information through an online
platform to individuals who may be separated by distance. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG) states that the delivery of electronic content and technologies must be perceivable,
operable, understandable, and robust (W3C 2008). Therefore, all learners should have the
opportunity to access and interact with technology in ways that meet their needs. It is important
that clients consider accessibility features before purchasing LMS, LCMS or CMS with the
consideration that they may be required to cater for learners with different needs based on their
disabilities. Web Content Accessibility guidelines seek to address the needs of people with all
accessibility features for persons of different settings who are expected to interact with LMS,
LCMS or CMS platforms. The aforementioned settings are Heart Trust NTA Institution,
Reliable Navigation Allows users to search Provide students with the option of
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 5
tools such as the search for content materials by using key words during their search
and menu bar typing its description Makes it easier for students to locate
into the navigation specific content material
search bar or by
selecting a particular
topic
Captions and Text Labels and provides a Allow students to easily access videos
alternative for non-text brief description of non- or images by typing its description in
content text content such as the search bar.
videos and images Students who are unable to hear the
audio of a video can have access to
the text alternative to read instead.
The Heart Trust NTA facilitates a wide diversity of learners of different ages, backgrounds, and
physical impairment such as blindness and deafness. The implementation of an LCMS at Heart
Trust NTA may result in blind students becoming dependent on another person to assist them
with accessing course content materials if the appropriate accessibility features are not available.
A screen reader and screen magnifier would be ideal alternative for visually impaired students to
benefit from the course content at their own convenience from the LCMS platform. According to
WebAIM (2019), “Screen readers were designed to convert digital text into synthesized speech
the content present on the screen.” Thus allowing the students to listen to the content on the
screen. The screen magnifier feature would be beneficial to students with poor eyesight, by
allowing them to spend less time trying to identify small text. Enlarged prints will allow students
to go through the course content quickly. It would also prevent the students’ eyes from being
strained and eventually worsen because they continuously try to read small texts.
Other accessibility features that would be beneficial to deaf students are captions and text
alternative. According to W3C (2008) “captions not only include dialogue but identify who is
speaking and include non-speech information conveyed through sound, including meaningful
sound effects.” Therefore captions would afford deaf students with the opportunity to grasp a
general concept of the content including in an audio clip by reading the description.
A variety of reliable navigation tools are necessary to assist students to urgently access necessary
content materials to assist them with their studies. According to W3C (2008) “users with visual
impairments may find it easier to navigate to the correct part of the site by using a search, rather
than scrolling through a large navigation bar using a screen magnifier or screen reader.”
Learning Management Systems (LMS) has been known for the accessibility and interactive
nature afforded to students and instructors due to the advancement of technological opportunities
and its availability to foster pedagogy. The students who attend study hall are accustomed to
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 9
being in a traditional classroom where they are required to sit and listen to lectures and follow
instructions. They often use their personal laptops to entertain themselves or when they are
forced to, they may conduct research. Therefore it may be challenging for the students to readily
adapt to the intended use of LMS. According to Goh (2014), “for the transition and adoption to
be conducted successfully, the various stakeholders need to understand the perceptions of the
lecturers in using the LMS as a teaching tool.” Therefore it is expected that the instructor
sensitizes students on the skill of maximizing the accessibility of the features that LMS offers to
The students who are required to be a part of study hall displays symptoms which suggest that
they may have a cognitive or learning disability which makes it difficult for them to focus on
reading and comprehending content material and/ or activities for a prolonged period. This
would have been one of the contributing factors which would have led to them being required to
attend the study hall programme. According to Gooding, et al (2015) “screen readers may assist
persons who are blind, visually impaired, illiterate or those with intellectual disabilities.”
Therefore screen readers can also be beneficial for students with learning disabilities. It would
be easier for these students to listen to the content (since they have to every day in a classroom
setting) and the screen reader would also provide the correct pronunciation of words they are not
accustomed to.
LMS such as Blackboard provides hyperlinks that would lead the user to locations within the
course site which may be difficult to exit. In the event that a curious teenage student may be in
the aforesaid situation, they could use breadcrumbs accessibility feature an avenue to navigate
back to the home page. Students may become frustrated if they are unable to freely move around
the course space especially without their teacher nearby to assist them.
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 10
presented on the platform are clear and simple yet attractive. Children are usually attracted to
welcoming and conducive space. According to Weakley (2005) “Content that is well written will
be easier for everyone to access including people with cognitive and learning difficulties.”
Therefore it best if the text presented is clear and simple, in the event where advance content is
available. According to W3C. (2008) “Supplemental content is required when text demands
reading ability more advanced than the lower secondary education level—that is, more than nine
years of school. Such text presents severe obstacles to people with reading disabilities and is
considered difficult even for people without disabilities who have completed upper secondary
education.”
Accessibility feature for CMS at Tiny Tots and A-Z Book Store
Menu Bars Organize the available content Provides customers with the
on the website into categories. capability to identify exactly
where information about a
specific product may be
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 11
Screen magnifier and According to Evans, et al Persons with poor eyesight will be to
screen reader (2008) “A screen magnifier access information from the
presents an enlarged portion company’s website without the
of the screen on a user’s struggle of trying to figure out the
monitor.” small prints.
Blind persons will be able to access
According to WebAIM information from the company’s
(2019), website by listening to audio clips
Screen readers were designed instead.
to convert digital text into
synthesized speech. Thus
allowing the students to listen
the content on the screen.
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 13
A Content Management System was recommended to enhance and promote Tiny Tot A-Z Book
Store. According to Kim, el al (2012) “Content Management systems (CMS) take care of content
creation, maintenance, versioning, and publishing on portals and search engines.” In order for the
implementation of a CMS to be feasible for the enhancement of the store it should be accessible
to both the staff members and the customers. Screen readers and screen magnifier would allow
staff members and customers with poor eyesight to access the stores website independently
which would be ideal when conducting personal transactions where security is needed.
Heading and Label allow users to operate menu and search bars with flexibility. According to
W3C. (2008) “headings are clear and descriptive, users can find the information they seek more
easily, and they can understand the relationships between different parts of the content more
easily. Descriptive labels help users identify specific components within the content.” The
implementation of menu bar on the store’s website would allow users to quickly access a listing
of headings and labels which makes it easier for user to identify different products from a central
page. The struggle and the time used for identifying information needed for business transaction
would be reduce.
Recommendations of Accessibility Features 14
Conclusion
This investigation and report has revealed the implementation of accessibility features for a
technological based platform should not be underestimated. Every effort should be made by the
instructor to cater for learners based on their needs. In an effort to achieve the aforesaid
statement, the accessibility features of a LMS, LCMS or CMS should be thoroughly assessed
References
Goh, W (2014). Exploring Lecturers’ Perceptions of Learning Management System: An
Gooding, et al (2015). Assistive technology as support for the exercise of legal capacity.
com.library.open.uwi.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=2608d6cd-4671-441b-
b258-e7b13321b01d%40sessionmgr104
Kim, et al (2013) Designing a social learning content management system based on learning
com.library.open.uwi.edu/docview/1422086196?accountid=42537&rfr_id=info%3Axri
%2Fsid%3Aprimo
Weakley (2005). Developing sites for users with Cognitive disabilities and learning difficulties.
https://webaim.org/techniques/screenreader/
W3C. (2008). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0: W3C Recommendation. Retrieved
from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/