Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Balanophoraceae PDF
Balanophoraceae PDF
Balanophoraceae
Author(s): Bertel Hansen
Source: Flora Neotropica, Vol. 23, Balanophoraceae (Jun. 16, 1980), pp. 1-80
Published by: New York Botanical Garden Press on behalf of Organization for Flora
Neotropica
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4393730
Accessed: 21/12/2008 17:52
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=nybg.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
New York Botanical Garden Press and Organization for Flora Neotropica are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Flora Neotropica.
http://www.jstor.org
FLORA NEOTROPIC
MONOGRAPH NUMBER 23
BALANOPHORACEAE
by
Bertel Hansen
FLORA/
,>
NEOTROPICA'
, I
I I-i Op pl AN
Published for
New York
1980
June 16, 1980
Copyright ( 1980
Hansen, Bertel.
Balanophoraceae.
Published by
The New York Botanical Garden
Bronx, New York 10458
All material subject to this copyright may be photocopied for the non-commercial purpose of
scientific or educational advancement.
A MONOGRAPH OF THE NEOTROPICAL BALANOPHORACEAE
BERTELHANSEN'
INTRODUCTION
ophoraceae into the dicotyledons close to Urticaceae but without stating his
reasons.
J. D. Hooker (1856) discussed the position of the Balanophoraceae in
detail and pointed out the strong similarities in flower characters between
Cynomorium and Hippuris and particularly between the bistylar forms, such
as Lophophytum (he did not know Ombrophytum very well) and Gunnera.
Eichler (1868) also placed the family in the dicotyledons and found their
closest relatives to be in the Santalaceae because of the strong similarity of the
reductions of the female flower.
J. D. Hooker, in Bentham & Hooker f. (1880), apparently influenced by
Eichler, placed Loranthaceae, Santalaceae and Balanophoraceae together.
The position of the Balanophoraceae close to the Santalaceae has been
followed by most subsequent authors. It was strongly advocated by Fagerlind
(1945b), who discussed in detail and illustrated the similarities of the much
reduced female flowers in Santalaceae, Myzodendraceae, Loranthaceae and
Balanophoraceae.
However, Kuijt (1969) warned against attaching too much importance to
the reduction in the gynoecium. He pointed out, that in most parasites the
gynoecium is subject to reduction, and similarities may easily be due to con-
vergence rather than to relationship.
Dahlgren (1975) in his angiosperm system places the Balanophorales (ie
Balanophoraceae s.l.) close to Gunnerales and Haloragales.
INFLORESCENCES
IAA"
A IC
4 A & kB CS
(ie lower)part and male ones on its central(ie upper)part, Fig 1, 3B and 3C,
Fig 2A. The female flowers are compressedand face with their flat sides
towardsthe petioles of the subtendingbracts;the two styles divergeover the
edgesof the ovaries.Note that the branchin Lophophytum,Fig 1, 1B and 1C
by being depressedwould transforminto a branchmuch like the one in Fig
1, 3B and 3C with regardto the arrangementof styles.
In Scybaliumdepressum,Fig 1, 4 and Fig 10, the imbricatebractscover-
ing the inflorescenceare distinctlypeltatewith a narrow,teretepetioleand an
angularly-ovatepelta. The branchof the firstorderis not even flat, but slightly
concavewith the male flowersinsertedat a lower level than the female ones,
Fig 1, 4C. A peculiar tendency in the female flowers to point their edges
towardsthe petioles of the subtendingbractsshould be noted, Fig 2B.
In Helosis, Fig 15, the bractscoveringthe inflorescenceare peltatewith
regular,hexagonal, valvate peltas, Fig 1, 5A. Each bract subtendsa totally
compressedbranchof the first order, Fig 1, 5B, which is obviouslyconcave,
Fig 1, 5C. The arrangementof the femaleflowersis the sameas in Scybalium
depressum,Fig 2C and D.
Corynaeahas the same arrangementas Helosis, but the branchesof the
first orderare even more concave,whichcausesthe centralmale flowersto be
partlycoveredby the peripheralfemale flowers, Fig 2E.
The bracts described above are considered homologous, the most
modified ones are those in Helosis and Corynaea.In fact the regular,hex-
agonalshapeof thesebractshaveoften misledearlierauthorsto considerthem
homologous to the sterile, apical, peltate part of the branches in Om-
brophytum,see Eichler (1868) and Fagerlind(1945b). In Ombrophytumthe
caducous bracts fall very early. As they are important charactersfor the
specific delimitation,collectors should always search for young specimens,
wherebractsare still present.
POLLENMORPHOLOGY
"
00 OOo""
00
'^ 0?^ O 0^eO^
o&?g
WEjC ) ,, O 0J O00oo -%q
0
Coo
00_
- ,/- o, _ooQ Ze Qjl2 ooooooo
00 ~ B
0000L0
DOj5 OOUO
c?
1.-Cameralucida drawings, x5.
10 grainsof the taxon under investigation were measured. Averages were cor-
ohavebeen prepared to throw light upon minute exine details. However, the
Scybalieae-- Scybalium
Scybalieae Scybalium (Fig 3)
(Fig 3)
8 Flora Neotropica
FIG 3. Pollen grains of Scybalium; A, B, D-F, H, I all LM x 1000; C, SEM x900, G, SEM
x 1290, K, SEM x 1910.-S. Jungiforme; A, high focus; B, optical section; C, surface view of
grain with irregular apertures.-S. glaziovii; D, optical section.-S. jamaicense; E, high focus; F,
Balanophoraceae 9
"
. _ ' .f fi i
%^
"IFF~
cal section; K surface view with one aperture open.-A-C, Ge.hr sn 1938; D, Brade sn 1948; E
and F, Alexander sn; G, Eggers sn 1887; H-K, Steyermark 52634.
10 Flora Neotropica
r4 e
x 1000;
FIG 4. Pollen grainsof Helosis cayennensis; A-F all LM G' SEM x 1275, H-K, SEM
.
ra;,i:6.._
., -r-!. _
? F.i
nensis var mexicana; . I, surface polar view; K, surface equatorial view.-, B, E, F and H, Hom-
Apocolpium diam.up.
9 m. Copi to 6 wide; os very distinct,
circular-.
.
....
'."i ? .i.,
..
:.-~~,, .::...
"q:*"
:j*" _. _::"':'
% i';Z:
nexine!); P/E: 1.24. Apocolpium
'm.diam. 7- . Colpi narrow, 1. wide; os
FIG 5. Pollen grains of Corynaea crassa; A, B, D-H all LM x 1000; C, SEM x 1660, I, SEM
x2040.-C. crassa var crassa; A, polar view in high focus; B, optical cross section; C, surface
polar view, one colpus artificially opened.-C. crassa var sprucei; D, polar view in high focus; E,
optical cross section; F, polar view in high focus of syncolpate grain; G, equatorial view in high
focus; H, optical longitudinal section; I, surface polar view of syncolpate grain, two colpi cracked
and interjacent mesocolpium slightly sunk into grain.-A-C, Asplund 10010; D, E, G, H, Holm-
Nielsen et al 6910; F, I, Haring & al 13209.
more or less distinct, lalongate, 9 x 1.8 Am. Exine 1.7 Mmthick, smooth or with
irregularly distributed nanoverrucae. Sexine 0.3 Am, irregularly loosened from
nexine except in the apocolpi and the central parts of the mesocolpi (Fig 6H-L)
(artefact ?). Material studied: Schunke 5675 (Peru).
Lophophytum mirabile (Fig 7A-F). Pollen grains usually tricolporate;
12 Flora Neotropica
1.
A :~ C S
I r
. .:'.it1
, .
wD. surface
i section;
focus; C optical' longitudinal . :H
r.. 'view os open; E, oblique~surface
equatorial
. . ':...:":
F'~
_ ":i ,. . v"
:!i ;
i
.._
_!I
G _ : ,
FIG 6. Pollen grains of Lophophytum; A-C, F-I all LM x .000 D SEM x 1365; E, SEM x 2300;
Balanophoraceae 13
view in high focus; G, focus between apocolpium and equator; H, equatorial view in high focus; I,
optical longitudinal section; K, surface equatorial view showing lalongate os; L, slightly oblique
surface equatorial view showing loose, undulating sexine which adheres to nexine in central part of
mesocolpium, compare I left side.-A-E, Krapovickas 15509; F-L, Schunke 5675.
14 Flora Neotropica
A:
.. A... g.
@B
FIG 7. Pollen grains of Lophophytum and Langsdorffia; A-C, G-L all LM x 1000; D, SEM
x1390; E, SEM x 1420; F SEM x1660; M, SEM x1775.-
Lophophytum mirabile subsp mirabile; A, polar view in high focus; B, optical longitudinal sec-
Balanophoraceae 15
o}~~~~~~~..~A 0
::
.....
K Ls
FIG 8. Pollen grains of Lathrophytum Ombrophytum; A-C, E-G, K, L all LM x 1000; D,
Lathrophytumnand Ombrophy/um;
SEM x 1225; H, SEM x 1425; I, SEM x 1400; M, SEM x 1990.-Lathrophkfum peckoltii; A,
1990.-Lathrophvtum pekoltii;
equatorial view in high focus showing colpus and os; B, optical longitudinal section; C, optical
cross section; D, slightly oblique surface view with triangular apocolpium upwards and equator at
lower
Loureig 690 H-L, Reinhard
rim.-Ombrophytum violaceum E
sn; M, Luezelburg
violaceum; sn. view in high focus; F, optical longitudinal
E, equatorial
section; G, optical cross section; H, surface polar view; 1, I, slightly oblique surface view with
apocolpium upwards.-Ombrophytum microlepis; K, optical longitudinal section; L, optical cross
section; M, oblique surface view with apocolpium downwards.-A-D, Peckolt sn 1886; E, G-l,
Sparre 13049; F, Wurdack2360; K-M, Schunke 3943.
tion; C, hexacolpate grain with three colpi focussed, compare F; D, surface polar view; E, surface
equatorial view; F, surface view of hexacolpate grain, slightly tilted over NW-SE-axis compared
with C.-Lophophytum mirabile subsp bolivianurn; G, optical longitudinal section.--Lan?s-
section.-Langs-
dorffia hypogaea; H, optical cross section; l,1, polar view in high focus; K, optical longitudinal sec-
tion; L, equatorial view in high focus; M, surface polar view, compare I.-A-E, .-A-E, Curran 22;22, G,
Lourteig 690; H-L, Reinhardt sn; M, Luetzelburg sn.
16 Flora Neotropica
EMBRYOLOGY
ffi *
: I .t
?;=- ~~~~~-
I_~ iW
X,, ?,,, .
18 Flora Neotropica
develops. Eventually the outer cells of the papilla seem to fuse with the inner
cells of the carpellary tissue, and no cavity can be demonstrated. Fagerlind
(1938a) found two megaspore mother cells in the papilla. They both enter
meiosis, and thus two dyads are formed. The upper cell in each dyad
degenerates and very soon also the lower cell in one of the dyads. The lower
cell in the second dyad quickly becomes 8-nucleate through three subsequent
divisions. The embryo sac development is thus bisporic and of the Allium-
type. The four upper nuclei form the egg-cell, two synergids and one polar
nucleus. The four lower, chalazal nuclei form 1-3 antipodal cells and 3-1 free
nuclei, which eventually fuse with the upper polar nucleus to become the cen-
tral nucleus. By this stage the hexagonal bracts, covering the inflorescence, are
shed. Now follows the fertilization and the formation of a cellular endosperm,
and finally a few-celled embryo develops. Fagerlind (1938b) demonstrated
much the same development in Ditepalanthus from Madagascar. Judging
from illustrations this development is likely to be found also in Scybalium
(Eichler 1869) and Rhopalocnemis (Lotsy 1901). It may thus be the rule in sub-
family Scybalioideae, but further research is needed to confirm this point.
Within subfamily Lophophytoideae much less is known. Eichler (1867)
investigated Lophophytum mirabile. The development of the female flower
shows obvious similarities to that of Helosis. A central, basal papilla, pro-
bably again an undifferentiated placenta, is formed. Also here a complete fu-
sion between placenta tissues and carpel walls takes place at later stages. The
further interpretation of Eichler's investigations is difficult. However, his il-
lustrations clearly show that two megaspore mother cells are developed in the
central papilla and that finally one embryo is developed, surrounded at
maturity by layers of stone cells. In Lathrophytum peckoltii only one embryo
is developed in the ovary as is shown in the illustrations of Eichler (1868,
1869). Poeppig & Endlicher (1838) described the ovary of Ombrophytum peru-
vianum as uniovular, possibly referring to the few-celled embryo. Asplund
(1928) and Sleumer (1954) found in Ombrophytum subterraneum an ovary
with the placental tissues at later stages completely adnate to the walls and only
one embryo developed. Further investigations are needed to throw light upon
details in the embryology of the Lophophytoideae, particularly the early stages
and the details of embryo sac development. However, even with the present
knowledge apparent similarities to the development within Scybalioideae may
be inferred.
Within subfamily Balanophoroideae Fagerlind (1945a, b and c) described
the embryology of Balanophora elongata and Langsdorffia hypogaea in
detail, reviewing earlier investigations. In Balanophora elongata he described
the development of the extremely undifferentiated ovary without cavity and
placenta (1945b). The centrally placed megaspore mother cell, however, has a
normal tetrad formation (1945a). The apical spore develops into an 8-nucleate
embryo sac. Already at the 2-nucleate stage a caecum develops from the basal
part of the embryo sac and grows quickly upwards, containing the basal
nucleus, eventually surpassing the morphological apex of the embryo sac. The
two nuclei each divide twice, and each end of the embryo sac thus contains a
group of 4 nuclei. Those at the morphological apex degenerate, while those at
the caecum develop into 1 egg cell, 2 synergids and 1 polar nucleus. The em-
Balanophoraceae 19
bryo sac is thus monosporic, developed from the apical spore, and subsequent-
ly 8-nucleate. A special feature is the development of the basal caecum, in
which the formation of the 8-celled embryo surrounded by a few-celled en-
dosperm takes place (Zweifel 1939).
Also in Langsdorffia hypogaea, Fagerlind (1945c) showed a monosporic
embryo sac development from the apical spore of the tetrad. At the 4-nucleate
stage a caecum is formed subbasally, growing quickly upwards as in
Balanophora elongata, containing the two basal nuclei. The further develop-
ment proceeds as in Balanophora elongata. Geesink (1972) described and il-
lustrated exactly the same kind of embryo sac in Langsdorffia papuana from
New Guinea.
ANATOMY
lustrations the connection between host and parasite is quite complicated also
in Langsdorffia where the underground tubers are much elongated and
rhizome-like. They consist of a parenchymatous tissue and 20-30 collateral
bundles. The vessels are reticulate or striate and have scalariform perforations.
The sieve tubes have perforated sieve plates.
In Helosis and Scybalium jamaicense subterranean, horizontal, rhizome-
like structures arise from the "primary" tuber. Their anatomy in Helosis was
described by Eichler (1869) and Umiker (1920). The parenchymatic cortex con-
tains numerous groups of stone cells. Centrally a single ring of 4-10 collateral
vascular bundles intermixed with medullary bundles is found. The vascular
bundles are accompanied by layers of sclerenchymatous cells.
The scaly leaves are destitute of stomata except in Cynomorium. Three
vascular bundles are found basally in the leaves of Langsdorffia hypogaea and
Lophophytum mirabile and one bundle in Scybalium fungiforme.
The inflorescence bearing stems in Helosis contain 12-20 vascular bundles
in two basal rings; the number is greater above by ramification, and the ar-
rangement is irregular; profuse branching occurs in the inflorescence. In
Scybalium fungiforme and Lophophytum mirabile up to 300 bundles are
found in the stems (Eichler 1869).
CHROMOSOMES
HOST PLANTS
Table 1. Host plants so far recorded of the following neotropical Balanophoraceae.- 1. Corynaea crassa
var sprucei.- 2. Helosis cayennensis var cayennensis.- 3. H.c. var mexicana.- 4. Langsdorffia
hypogaea.- 5. Lathrophytum peckoltii.- 6. Lophophytum leandri.- 7. L.mirabile ssp mirobile.- 8. L.m.
ssp boliviona.- 9. Ombrophytum subterraneum.- lo. Ombrophytum violaceum.- 11. Scybollum glaziovil.-
12. S. jamaicense.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lo 11 12
Arecac.: Geonoma sp. 4
- : Iriarteo sp. 4
Bignon.: unidentified taxon lo
Compos.: Baccharis petiolata DC. 9
- Eupatorium angulare B.L.Robinson 1
- - bupleurifolium DC. 9
- Heterothalamus spartioides Hook. & Am. 9
- Lepidophyllum quadrangulare (Meyen)Benth. & Hook. 9
- Scalesia pedunculota Hook.f. 9
- Tessaria absinthioides DC. 9
- Vguieria mollis Gris. 9
Dioscor.: Dioscorea megalantha Gris. 9
Euphorb.: Senefeldera sp. 5
Legum.: Anadenanthera macrocarpa (Benth.) Brenon 6
- Apuleia sp. 6
- Cassia emorginata L. 12
- Enterolobium sp. 8
- Inga sp. 2 7
- Medicago sativa L. 9
- Mimosa sp. 4
Piptadenia rigida Benth. 6
- p. 8
Pithecolobium sp. 8
Molpigh.: Byrsonima sp. 4
Meelastom.: unidentified taxon 11
Meliac.: Trichilia sp. 4
Moroc.: ticus sp. 3 4
Myrist.: Myristica bicuhyba Schott 5
Myrsir .: unidentified taxon 11
Sapot.; Achras sapota L. 3
Solon.: Nicotiana glauca Grah. 9
Urticac.: Boehmeria sp. 2
Number of hosts per taxon of parasites 1 2 2 6 2 3 1 3 lo 1 2
SYSTEMATICTREATMENT
Helosidoideae Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 311. 1935; Angely, Fl. Anal. e Fitog. Sao
Paulo 1: 55. 1969; nom. illeg. superfl.
Tribus Scybalieae Eichler, Actes Congr. Bot. Paris 152. 1867; in Martius, Fl.
Bras. 4. 2: 7. 1869; emend. Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 131. 1873; Engler,
Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 256. 1889; Angely, Fl. Anal. e Fitog. Sao
Paulo 1: 56. 1969.
Stem with triangular, scaly leaves. Inflorescences when young covered by
triangular, imbricate bracts. Pollen grains 6-polypantoporate.
Type genus. Scybalium Schott & Endlicher, Melet. Bot. 3. 1832.
1. Scybalium Schott & Endlicher, Melet. Bot. 3. 1832; Endlicher, Gen. Plant.
74. 1836; Griffith, Trans. Linn. Soc. London 20: 104. 1846; Hooker f.,
Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 50. 1856; Eichler in Martius, Fl. Bras.
4. 2: 35. 1869; in DC., Prod. 17: 131. 1873; Hooker f. in Bentham &
Hooker f., Gen. P1. 3: 236. 1880; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 256.
1889; Fawcett & Rendle, Fl. Jamaica 3: 103. 1914; Harms, Nat.
Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 318. 1935; Leon & Alain, Fl. Cuba 2: 83. 1951;
Angely, Fl. Anal. e Fitog. Sao Paulo 1: 56. 1969; Falcao, Atas Soc. Biol.
Rio de Janeiro 14: 154. 1971; Adams, Flow. PI. Jamaica 244. 1972;
Falcao, Loefgrenia 57: 1. 1973; Fl. II. Cat. BALA 18. 1975.
Phyllocoryne Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 51. 1856; Grisebach, Fl. Brit. W.
Ind. 309. 1860.
Sphaerorhizon Hooker f., Trans Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 50. 1856.
1. Bracts of inflorescence obviously peltate with narrowly angularly-ovate pelta; female flowers
compressed, arranged with edge towards petiole of bract; male flowers (2-)3-merous; heads
bisexual. 1. S. depressum.
1. Bracts of inflorescence not obviously peltate; female flowers ? compressed, arranged with
flat side facing petiole of bract; male flowers 3-merous; heads bisexual or unisexual.
2. Stem strongly obconical, terminating in a depressed, disk-like, unisexual inflorescence;
bracts of inflorescence subpeltate with flattened-canaliculate petiole 5-8 mm long and 2.5-
5 mm broad. 2. S. fungiforme.
2. Stem narrowly cylindrical, terminating in an ellipsoid to long-ellipsoid inflorescence;
bracts of inflorescence basally with very broad and short, extremely flattened-canaliculate
petiole 3 mm long and 7-16 mm wide.
3. Bracts of inflorescence arranged in ca. 6 vertical ranks. 3. S. jamaicense.
3. Bracts of inflorescence arranged in 14-20 vertical ranks. 4. S. glaziovii.
Sphaerorhizon depressum Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 65, t. 10. 1856.
Sphaerorhizon curvatum Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 50. 1856.
a
C"
W a? y. id ,,,,,I
FIG 10. Species of Scybalium. A-E, S. depres.sum, A, after Hooker f. (1856), B, C (Holm-Niel.sen
el a! 1267), D (SSteyermrk 52634), E, (fosberg et Core 21518) original. A, habit x0.5; B, bract
subtending inflorescence branch, front view of peltate part x 3; C, the same, side view (compare
Fig 1, 4B and 4C) x 3; D, dimerous male flower with perianth segments irregularly incised at apex
x6; E, female flower x7. F-M, S. fungiforme, F-L, after Eichler (1869), M (de Lima 238)
original. F, typical habit with one male inflorescence surrounded by several female ones, all ap-
pearing from the same tuber x0.5; G, bract subtending inflorescence branch, front view x 1; H,
the same, side view x 1; 1, section of male inflorescence with two buds and the two kinds of hairs
x4; K, male flower x4.5; L, longitudinal section of male flower with ovoid-
conical body basally in the staminal tube x 4; M, female flower x 7.
bisexual) brown to rose-purple root parasites. Total length from point of con-
tact with host root (4-)6-12(-15) cm. Tuber subspherical 0.8-4(-7) cm diam.,
single or a few fused together, surface finely granular, often with a few conical
appendages 2.25 mm long and 1.5 mm diam. at base. Stem cylindrical, 1.3-8
cm long, 0.8-1 cm wide. Leaves scaly, numerous, apparently spirally arranged,
at base of stem sessile, long triangular, obtuse at apex, up to 17 x 5 mm, up-
wards becoming more or less peltate, pelta narrowly angularly-ovate. In-
florescence ovoid-obovoid, 1.8-3.0(-3.8) x 1.2-2.3(-2.7) cm, densely covered
by bracts when young. Bracts peltate with a terete petiole 0.5-1.5 mm across
Balanophoraceac 27
and 1.5 mm long, pelta narrowly angularly-ovate, 12-13 x4-5 mm, apparently
spirally arranged and densely imbricate, early deciduous and then for a short
time leaving a circular cavity in the dense layer of filiform hairs covering the
inflorescence, cavity later on closing completely. The rhombic, slightly
transversally extended area delimitated by imaginary lines connecting four
neighboring petioles represents one extremely depressed branch subtended by
the lowermost of the four bracts in question. Each branch with a slightly curv-
ed central depression under which 10-15 male flowers are embedded in the
layer of hairs, surrounded by 40-60 female flowers; strongly proterogynous.
Hairs thinly clavate, 1.4-1.5 mm long. Male flowers with a 2-3-lobed tubular
perianth, by rapid growth in the tubular part appearing above layer of hairs
during anthesis, and then with tube 1.75 x 0.4 mm and tepals ovate, 2.5 x 1.5
mm. Filaments connate into a column 2.5 x0.3 mm, widening to 0.6 mm
diam. just below synandrium. Synandrium ellipsoid, 0.9x0.75 mm,
longitudinally 4-9 celled. Pollen grains spheroid-ellipsoid, polypantopororate,
26.2 Mtm diam., with extremely thin exine 0.5-0.7 Mtm,nuclei 3. Female flowers
with perianth adnate to ovary, 2 short and broad, lip-like segments protruding
above ovary, compressed with edge generally facing petioles of bracts, 1.5 mm
long from base to tip of segments, 0.4 mm wide; styles 2, filiform, 1.5 mm
long, appearing above layer of hairs; stigmas capitellate. Fruit a small,
1-seeded achene.
Type. Purdie sn July 1846, Colombia, between Niva and Paramo de Ruiz
(holotype, K).
Distribution. In montane forests 1500-3000 m, apparently flowering all
year round. Host not known.
COLOMBIA. Ewan 16075 (US); Little 7650(US); Pittier 1531 (US); Fosberg et al 21518 (US).
ECUADOR. Acosta Solis 5837 (F); Holm-Nielsen et al 1262 (AAU); Steyermark 52634 (NY).
BRAZIL. Glaziou 4070a (P); Goias: Anderson et al 7412 (NY); Minas Gerais: Regnell sn
(BR); Lemos sn (SP); Sao Paulo: Eiten, Eiten et al 3094 (K); Lima 238 (SP); Pickel 3423 (R); Mello
sn (K); Gehrt sn (SP).
3. Scybalium jamaicense (Swartz) Schott & Endlicher, Melet. Bot. 12. 1832;
Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 133. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1:
257. 1889; Urban, Symb. Ant. 4: 210. 1905; Fawcett & Rendle, Fl.
Jamaica 3: 104, pl. 5. 1914; Urban, Symb. Ant. 8: 190. 1920; Harms, Nat.
Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 319. 1935; Le6n & Alain, Fl. Cuba 2: 83, f. 31.
1951; Adams, Flow. PI. Jamaica 244. 1972.
Fig 11, Fig 3 (pollen), Fig 12 (distr.).
Cynomorium jamaicense Swartz, Nov. Gen. & Sp. P1. 12. 1788; Fl. Ind., Occ. 1: 1797.
Helosis jamaicensis (Swartz) Richard, Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat. 8: 432. 1822.
Phyllocoryne jamaicensis (Swartz) Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 51, t. 11.
1856; Grisebach, Fl. Brit. W. Ind. 309. 1860; Mem. Acad. Amer. Scient. & Artium, N.
Ser. 8: 191. 1860; Cat. PI. Cub. 118. 1866.
Cynomorium coccineum auct. non Linn.; Descourtils, Fl. Med. Antill. 2: 113, t. 96. 1822.
Balanophoraceae 29
CUBA. Oriente: Clement sn (NY); Ekman 3348 (K, NY, S); 5113 (S); 9037 (NY, S); Morton &
Acuna 3615 (UC); Shafer 8858 (NY); Taylor 219 (NY); Wright 546 (BR, GOET, K, MO, NY, P,
UC). JAMAICA. Alexander sn (GOET, K); Anderson & Sternberg 3117 (MO); Britton & Hollick
2780 (NY); Howard & Proctor 13400 (BM, LE, NY, S, U); Kramer 1780 (U); Lloyd sn (P); Maxon
9137 (S); Maxon & Killip 559 (NY); Morley & Whitefoord 638 (MO); Morris sn (K); Orcutt 2844
(UC); 5706 (K, UC); Philipson 1253 (BM); Proctor 9341 (NY); 21465 (NY); Purdie sn (K); Ridley
sn (K); Schrink sn (MO); Webster et al 4981 (BM); 8352 (S); Wullschligel 1300 (GOET, M); Yun-
cker 17553 (S); 18466 (BM, S). HAITI. Ekman 2653 (S); 3877 (S); 10581 (S); Leonard 5763 (NY).
SANTO DOMINGO. Bertero sn (MO); Eggers 1620 (C, K, L, M); Ekman 14285 (K, S); Liogier
14463 (NY); Tuerckheim 700 (BR); 2657 (BM, BR, K, L, M, MO, NY, S). PUERTO RICO.
Sintenis 4238 (B, BM, BR, GOET, K, L, LE, M, MO, NY, P, S).
'7~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-. F~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J
~~~~~~~~~~
....
-~
CC ~~ ~ ~
N ~ 3i
~~~~h ~ ~~
N.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r?.?
E
LT~~~Sa`
FI .Seiso SyaimadCrnaa -,S aaces,A ,atrHokrf I86,B
C Egr n 87,E(lchlseimna )oignl ,hbi,bat o nlrseneaese
xO5 B ongiforsecesil oeedb rat x.;C,ml ifoesec wt ud p
Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro13: 65. 1953;Falcao, Atas Soc. Biol. Rio
de Janeiro 14: 154. 1971;Fl. I1. Cat. BALA 22, f. 6. 1975.
Fig 11, Fig 3 (pollen), Fig 12 (distr.).
Tribus Helosieae Schott & Endlicher,Melet. Bot. 11. 1832 p.p. guoad gen.
Helosis; Endlicher, Gen. P1. 74. 1836 p.p. quoad gen. Helosis.
pearing above layer of hairs x0.5; D, male flower x5; E, female flower x7. F-K, S. glaziovii
(Glaziou 4070b, 4700) original. F, habit, inflorescence still covered by bracts x0.5; G, in-
florescence with bracts partly removed, each branch visible due to deep fissures in the layer of
hairs x 1; H, bract subtending inflorescence branch, front view x 3; 1, the same, side view x 3; K,
female flower x 7. L-O, Corynaea crassa, L, N after Hooker f. (1856), M, O (G6moezsn) original.
L, habit of large specimen x0.5; M, detail of another specimen x0.5; N, male flower of var
crassa x 5; 0, male flower of var sprucei x 4.5.
32 Flora Neotropica
~:. ,f BI?'
9 0T o Is
W 9f
i; 2t ' .
tX.z
-- --. -. .. -. + _ - -. .-. t -
.- -1- -
-- ----- '- T:-4op.co -
Helosideae Hooker f. [Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 1856 nom. nud. stat. incert.] ex
Eichler, Actes Congr. Bot. Paris 152. 1867 p.p. quoad gen. Helosis, Corynaea, Rhopaloc-
nemis; in Martius, Fl. Bras. 4. 2: 5. 1869 p.p. quoad gen. op. cit.; emend. Eichler in DC.,
Prod. 17: 134. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 258. 1889.
2. Helosis L. C. Richard, Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat. 8: 416, 430, 432. 1822, nom.
cons.; Schott et Endlicher, Melet. Bot. 11. 1832; Martius, Nov. Gen.
Spec. Plant. 3: 184. 1832; Endlicher, Gen. Plant. 74. 1836; Griffith,
Trans. Linn. Soc. London 20: 104. 1846; Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc.
London 22: 31, 55. 1856; Grisebach, Fl. Brit. W. Ind. 309. 1860; Eichler
in Martius, Fl. Bras. 4. 2: 21. 1869; in DC., Prod. 17: 134. 1873; Hooker
f. in Bentham et Hooker f., Gen. P1. 3: 237. 1880; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf.
ed. 1. 3. 1: 258. 1889; Duss, Ann. Inst. Bot.-Geol. Marseille 3: 325. 1897;
Lanjouw in Pulle, Fl. Suriname 1. 1: 45. 1932; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf.
ed. 2. 16b: 319. 1935; Macbride, Fl. Peru 2: 430. 1936; Standley, Fl.
Costa Rica 410. 1937; Standley & Steyermark, Fl. Guatemala 4: 92. 1946;
Le6n & Alain, Fl. Cuba 2: 84. 1951; Lemee, Fl. Guy. Franc. 1: 545. 1955;
Nevling, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 47: 304. 1960; Falcao, Rodriguesia
25(37): 135. 1966; Angely, Fl. Anal. e Fitog. Sao Paulo 1: 56. 1969;
Falcao, Atas Soc. Biol. Rio de Janeiro 14: 151. 1971; Fl. II. Cat. BALA
27. 1975.
Caldasia Mutis ex Caldas in Seman, Nuevo Reyno Granada 1810(2): 26. 1810, not seen,
nom. illeg.
Latraeophila Leandro do Sacramento ex A. St.-Hilaire, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ser. 2. 7: 32.
1837, nom. nud.
m alt. A m alt.
A A
3000 . 3000
A A
A
A
2000 * 2000
A 0o
* O
0
0 0
0 0 0
A 0
0? ?o
*?.0 *
1000 0 1000
% %
*
S lat. 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 N lat.
A Corynaea crassa
o Helosis cayennensis var mexicana
* Helosis cayennensis var cayennensis
FIG 13. Altitudinal distribution of Helosis and Corynaea along the Andes.
icana at the R-value 2.8, in other words specimens with R-values >2.8 are
referred to var cayennensis, those with R-values <2.8 to var mexicana. The
position of the type of var mexicana with R = 1.27 is indicated in Fig 14. Thus
defined var mexicana is represented with classes 7-10 in Mexico, 5, 7 and 9 in
Central America, 6 in Cuba, 5 and 7-9 in the Lesser Antilles, 7 in Colombia, 9
in Ecuador, and 5 and 7 in SE Brazil. It is apparently confined to more or less
hilly country. Short-stemmed forms with proportionately large inflorescences
are found throughout the distribution area. Such forms were the basis of
Helosis brasiliensis Schott & Endl., an entity I find impossible to distinguish at
any taxonomic level.
Cynomorium cayennense Swartz, Nov. Gen. & Sp. PI. 12. 1788; Fl. Ind. Occ. 1: 13.
1797; ("cayanense").
Class stem R
(levelof scales) base to scales
10
9
8 -------type of var mexicana-. 1.
6
2
2.5
4 2.8
3
5
2
10
10 20 30 40 50% of specimens
FIG 14. Helosis cayennensis. Frequency classes corresponding to position of scales on stem (see
text).
36 Flora Neotropica
Helosis guyanensis Richard, Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat. 8: 416, 432, t. 20. 1822 nom. illeg.
superfl. ("guyannensis"); Mart., Nov. Gen. Spec. Plant. 3: 184, t. 298, 300. 1832; Schott
& Endlicher, Melet. Bot. 12. 1832; Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 57, t. 16.
1856; Grisebach, Fl. Brit. W. Ind. 309. 1860; Eichler, Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 26: t. 9, f. 19,
20. 1868; in Martius, Fl. Bras. 4.2: 23, t. 4-6. 1869; in DC., Prod. 17: 136. 1873; Engler,
Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 258. 1889; Duss, Ann. Inst. Bot.-Geol. Colon. Marseille 3:
326. 1897; Pulle, Enum. P1. Surinam 158. 1906; Huber, PI. Duck. 341. 1908; Glaziou,
Mem. Soc. Bot. France 1(3): 610. 1913; Le6n & Alain, Fl. Cuba 2: 84. 1951; Angely, Fl.
Anal. e Fitog. Sao Paulo 1: 56. 1969. Type. Richard sn, French Guiana, Cayenne (P).
Helosis brasiliensis Schott & Endlicher, Melet Bot. 12. 1832 ("brasileensis"); Eichler in DC.,
Prod. 17: 135. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 258,f. 164. 1889; Harms, Nat.
Pflanzenf., ed. 2. 16b: 321,f. 161, 162. 1935; Falcao, Rodriguesia 25(37): 136. 1966; Atas
Soc. Biol. Rio de Janeiro 14: 151. 1971; Martins f., Leandra 2: 98. 1972; Falcao, Fl. I1.
Cat. BALA 28. 1975. Type. Schott sn, Brazil, Mt. Serra d'Estrella (Not located)
wF C B
FIG15. Helosis cayennensis. A, after Eichler (1869), B, C, after Richard (1822), D, after Hooker
f. (1856). A, habit of var cayennensis x0.5; B, male flower basally surrounded by clavate hairs
x 7; C, female flower surrounded by clavate hairs x 12; D, habit of var mexicana x 0.5.
Balanophoraceae 37
Caldasia cayennensis (Sw.) Mutis ex Steudel, Nom. ed. 2. 1: 255. 1840; Kuntze, Rev. Gen.
2: 590. 1891.
Helosis guyanensis forma brasiliensis (Schott & Endlicher) Eichler in Martius, Fl. Bras. 4. 2:
23, t. 5, f. 1. 1869.
Caldasia brasiliensis (Schott & Endlicher) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 2: 590. 1891.
Helosis mexicana auct. non Liebmann: Standley & Steyermark, Fl. Guatemala 4: 93. 1946
p.p.; Nevling, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 47: 304. 1960 p.p. quoad Kuntze 74 (= 1926) and
Seibert 469.
Stem basally with an involucre of 2-6 minute, triangular scales; the ratio
between the length of the stem and the distance from base of stem to involucre
not less than 2.8.
Type. Richard sn, French Guiana, Cayenne between 1784 and 1789 (lec-
totype here selected, C; isolectotype, P).
Distribution. Tropical rain forests and montane forests in damp places,
alt. 0-1500(-2000) m. Flowering specimens collected all year round. Hosts
recorded: Boehmeria sp. (Urticacaceae), Inga sp. (Leguminosae).
MEXICO. Morelos: Miranda 1483 (MEXU); Tabasco: Sarakhan 1985 (MEXU); Matuda
3558 (MEXU); Chiapas: Breedlove 22479 (MO); Miranda 7530 (MEXU). GUATEMALA. Peten:
Hedger 74 (BM); Steyermark 46131 (F, MO, NY); Alta Verapaz: Tuerckheim 8576 (K, NY);
Izabal: Steyermark 39584 (F). BRITISH HONDURAS. Belize: Dwyer 11696 (MO); Muchaca:
Schipp 1129 (BM, F, K, MO, NY, S). HONDURAS. Atlantida: Standley 54815 (F). COSTA
RICA. Guanacasta: Brenes 12638 (F); Tilaran: Kupper 1549 (M); Heredia: Maas 1334 (U); Car-
tago: Maas 1178 (C, U); Golfo Dulce: Pittier 9900 (BR). PANAMA. Chiriqui: Wilburet al 15454
(MO); Cocle: Seibert 469 (K, MO); Canal Zone: Kuntze 1926 (NY); Kennedy & Wilder3101 (MO);
Darien: Duke 13621 (MO); Gentry & Mori 14018 (MO); Stern et al 737 (LE). COLOMBIA.
Boioassu: Black et al 46241 (TAN); Bolivar: Curran sn (US); 334 (US); Santander: Haught 2010
(US); Choc6: Fosberg et al 21520 (US); Tolima: Barriga 8395 (COL, US); Meta: Giovanni 36
(COL); El Valle Cauca: Alston 7819 (BM); Killip 8354 (GH, NY, US); Vaupes: Pinto & Sastre 918
(COL, P); Caqueta: Castaneda 4054 (COL); Amazonas: Barriga 14700 (COL); Jaramillo 2451
(COL); Plowman et al 2345 (GH); Schultes 6197 (GH); 6323 (COL); 6657 (COL); 6829 (US); 8117
(GH); 12091a (GH). VENEZUELA. Merida: Bernardi 3347 (NY); Fendler sn (GH); Amazonas:
Maguire et al 31606 (F, GH, K, NY, P, RB, U, US); 31607 (NY, U); Aragua: Robyns et al sn (BR);
Steyermark 89838 (US); Bolivar: Steyermark 86840 (NY); 88983 (NY, US); 89372 (US); Wurdack
& Monachino 39757 (F, GH, K, NY, R, RB, US); Delta Amacuro: Rusby & Squires 105 (BM, F,
GH, M, MO, NY, US). TRINIDAD. Arena forests: Broadway 6434 (BM, S); 6568 (BM, S);
Crueger sn (K); Aripo: Herb. Trin. 15416 (K); Mt. Tamana: Purdie sn (K). GUYANA. Brit. Gui.
For. Dept. G. 79 (K); F 3023 (K); Cowan et Soderstrom 2005 (NY); Jenman 1852 (K); Maguire et
al 23524 (F, GH, K, MO, NY, U, US); Marlyn 269 (K); Sandwith 620 (K); Ward 8629 (K).
SURINAME. Cowan & Lindeman 39116 (NY); Daniels & Jonker 733 (U); 1134 (U); 1277 (U);
Florschitz & Maas 2545 (U); 2604 (GH, U); 2863 (U); 2942 (U); Jonker- Verhoef & Jonker 443
(NY, U); Kegel 607 (GOET); Kramer & Hekking 2478 (U); Maas 11068 (U); Maguire 40733 (NY,
U); 40794 (F, NY, U); Prance et al 55899 (U); Schulz 10287 (U); Splitgerber 728 (L); Stahel 803
(U); 4659 (U); Teunissen 12951 (C); Wessels Boer 734 (F, U, UC); Wullschlagel sn (BR); 843
(GOET). FRENCH GUIANA. Broadway 799 (GH, NY, US); Granville 72 (CAY, P); 2164
(CAY); Halle 636 (P); Maas 2180 (C, U); Oldeman 1141 (CAY); 1199 (CA Y); Sastre 1635 (P);
Schnell 12239 (P). ECUADOR. Guayas: Haught 2881 (US); Azuay: Lehmann 401 (K); Morona
-Santiago: Holm-Nielsen et al 4155 (AAU); Sparre 19070 (S). PERU. Loreto: Asplund 14226 (S);
Croat 18824 (MO); Ducke 7595 (MG); Ferreyra3401 (US); Killip 27622 (US); Simpson & Schunke
660 (F, NY); Wurdack 2112 (US); Amazonas: Berlin 404 (MO); 457 (MO); Junin: Ruiz sn (FI);
Cuzco: Plowman 4934 (C, CUZCO, F, GH). BOLIVIA. Pando: Prance et al 5804 (NY); 8513
(NY). BRAZIL. Gwynne Vaughan 55 (K); Miers sn (BM, K); Riedel sn (LE); Snethlage 231 (B);
Rondonia: Prance et al 8765 (F, GH, MG, NY, R, S, U); Roraima: Pires et al 14521 (IAN); Prance
et al 4457 (NY); 9370 (NY); 10499 (U); 10819 (C, NY); 13565 (MG, NY, U); Amapi: Black 498423
(IAN); Egler & Irwin 46697 (NY); Luetzelburg 20143 (R); 20173 (R); 20212 (R); 21245 (M, R);
21679 (M); 21866 (M); 21891 (M); Maguire et al 47006 (NY, U, US); 47091 (IAN, K, NY, SP, U);
Amazonas: Baldwin 3302 (US); Black et al 483416 (IAN); Cavalcante 3205 (MG); Chagas 3122
(INPA); 3553 (IAN, INPA, MO); 6309 (IAN, INPA); Ducke 6875 (MG); Ernani 6424 (INPA);
Fereira 58221 (IAN); Martius 2643 (M); Prance et al 3589 (NY, US); 8080 (MG, C); 10200 (F, MO,
NY, R, S, U); 14391 (NY, U); 15787 (C, F, MG, NY, S, U); 16309 (F, GH, M, MG, NY, S, U);
24212 (C); 24410 (C); Rodrigues 8347 (INPA); Silva 689 (INPA); Spruce 877 (BM, FI, LE, M);
1129 (GH, K); Ule 6069 (B); Para: Austin & Cavalcante 4137 (MO); Black 47957 (IAN); 472039
Balanophoraceae 39
.. -.- .. ...-.- - Tc
---
-- 1- . - '> - t--
~(IAN)~; 482388 (IAN);l 482961 (IAN); 498584 (IAN); Black et al 1410 (IAN); Ca
(IAN); 482388 (IAN); 482961 (IAN); 498584 (IAN); Black et al 1410 (IAN); Cavalcante 2261
(MG); Ducke 3462 (MG); 3561 (MG); 3632 (MG); Guedes 2298 (MG); Lima 531437 (IAN);
531526 (IAN); Luetzelburg 21085 (R); 21259 (M, R); Pires 1239 (IAN); Pires & Silva 4511 (IAN);
Prance et al 25483 (C, NY); Sastre 1518 (P); Silva 1241 (MG, SP); Spruce 151 (K); 574 (GH, K);
Acre: Prance et al 2764 (NY); 7833 (MG, NY, U); Paraiba (?): Luetzelburg sn (M); Guanabara:
Araujo et al 204 (RB); Rio de Janeiro: Araujo et al 523 (RB); Glaziou 4969a (BR, C, P); Lutz &
Sigueira sn (R); Miers sn (BM); Occhioni 981 (RB); Sick 783 (HB); Sao Paulo: Kuhlmann 4613
(SP); Mathias 5673 (SP); ParanA: Hatschbach 11287 (US); 20981 (C); Santa Catarina: Lourteig
2320 (P); Moller sn (B); Rio Grande do Sul: Leite 720 (NY); Malme sn (S).
Cynomorium cayennense Sw. This event must have taken place during
Richard's visit to Guiana and the West Indies 1784-1789 more precisely in 1784
or 1785 when von Rohr visited Cayenne. von Rohr was understood to bring
the material to Banks in London, which apparently he did, for Swartz (1788)
published Cynomorium cayennense and clearly indicated that the description
was drawn on the basis of material studied in London on his way back to
Sweden where he arrived in 1789. No type material has been traced at BM and
it must have been lost. However, von Rohr used to send plant material from
his extensive journeys to Vahl in Copenhagen. As a matter of fact there is at C
a specimen from Vahl's herbarium with "Cynomorium cajanense" and
"Richard" in Vahl's handwriting. I consider this a duplicate of the material
studied by Swartz and have chosen it as lectotype. A Richard specimen at P
may be another duplicate, and I have called it an isolectotype. The specimen at
P must be the type for the superfluous name Helosis guyanensis Richard.
Helosis mexicana Liebmann, Forhandl. Skand. Naturf. 4. Mode 1844: 181. 1847; Hooker
f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 59, t. 15, 16. 1856; Grisebach, Cat. PI. Cub. 118.
1866; Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 136. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 258. 1889;
Standley, Fl. Yucatan 250. 1930; Fl. Lancet. Hond. 178. 1931; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf.
ed. 2. 16b: 321. 1935; Standley & Record, For. & Fl. Brit. Hond. 123. 1936; Standley, Fl.
Costa Rica 410. 1937; Standley & Steyermark, Fl. Guatemala 4: 92. 1946 p.p.; Nevling,
Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 47: 304,f. 87. 1960 p.p. quoad ill.
Helosis guyanensis var andicola Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 57. 1856. Type.
Goudot 140, Colombia (lectotype here selected, K; isolectotype, FI).
Helosis guyanensis forma andicola (Hooker f.) Eichler in Martius, F. Bras. 4. 2: 23. 1869.
Helosis mexicana var andicola (Hooker f.) Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 136. 1873.
Caldasia mexicana (Liebmann) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 2: 590. 1891.
CUBA. Arroyo veintecenco: Wright2636 (BM, GOET, K, LE, MO, NY, P, S). MARTINI-
QUE. d'Alleizette 6363 (L); Duss 2106 (NY); Hahn 400 (BM). SANTA LUCIA. Proctor 17764
(BM); Ramage sn (K). MEXICO. Matuda 423 (MEXU, MO, NY); 4167 (MEXU, NY); San Luis
Potosi: Pringle 5050 (MEXU); Veracruz: Beaman 6185 (U); Bourgeau 3030 (FI, K, LE); Dressier
& Jones 38 (MEXU, NY); Linden 146 (BR, FI, K); Purpus 2750 (BM, F, MO, NY); 5896 (BM,
MO, NY); 7691 (MO, NY); Chiapas: Peldes sn (MEXU). GUATEMALA. Huehuetenango:
Steyermark 51848 (F, NY); Quezaltenango: Walker449 (BM); Alta Verapaz: Tuerckheim 1044 (K,
NY, P); Suchitep6quez: Steyermark 46801 (F). BRITISH HONDURAS. Lundell 6414 (F, MEXU,
NY, S); Schipp 719 (F). NICARAGUA. Hawkes, Hjerting & Lester 2152 (C, K). COSTA RICA.
Cartago: Lent 788 (F); 1282 (F, MO); Wilbur & Stone 10309 (F); Alajuela: Lent 1658 (F); San
Jose: Skutch 2669 (K, MO, S). PANAMA. Chirique: Croat & Porter 16158 (MO). COLOMBIA.
Balanophoraceae 41
- r'- I
Tg
--!t-f
-.
t
t*^ + ?*--
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I
Soo0 000 500
i ^
^h
.-- ...-.4--... . -
-1-\.-.J.i.- . . ....
_ ____ L
FIG 17. Distribution of Helosis cayennensis var mexicana.
El Valle Cauca: Welden sn (C); Melgar: Purdie sn (K). ECUADOR. Los Rios: Eliasson 13 (GB).
BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: Pires sn (R); Santa Catarina: Reitz & Klein 7328 (UC, US); 17353 (US);
Ule 748 (US).
3. Corynaea Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 54. 1856 emend.
B. Hansen; Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 137. 1873; Hooker f. in Bentham &
Hooker f., Gen. PI. 3: 237. 1880; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 258.
1889; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 322. 1935; Macbride, Fl. Peru 2:
431. 1936; Standley, Fl. Costa Rica 410. 1937; Nevling, Ann. Missouri
Bot. Gard. 47: 305. 1960.
1. Corynaea crassa Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 54, t. 13.
1856; Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 137. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1.
3. 1: 259,f. 165F. 1889; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 322,f. 163F.
1935; Standley, Fl. Costa Rica 40. 1937; Nevling; Ann. Missouri Bot.
Gard. 47: 306,f. 88. 1960. Fig 11, Fig 5 (pollen), Fig 18 (distr.).
Corynaea purdiei Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 55. 1856; Eichler in DC.,
Prod. 17: 138. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 259. 1889; Harms, Nat.
Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 322. 1935; Macbride, Fl. Peru 2: 431. 1936; Steyermark, Fieldiana
28: 898. 1957. Type. Purdie sn, Colombia and Weddell sn, Peru (not extant, neither at K
nor P).
Corynaea sphaerica Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 31, 55, t. 14. 1856; Eichler
in DC., Prod. 17: 137. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed 1. 3. 1: 259. 1889; Harms, Nat.
Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 322. 1935. Type Purdie sn, Colombia (holotype K).
Itoasia crassa (Hooker f.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 2: 590. 1891.
Itoasia purdiei (Hooker f.) Kuntze, I.c.
Itoasia sphaerica (Hooker f.) Kuntze, I.c.
Balanophoraceae 43
' ~ ,?I r s
001
-- - -} ~: _
' ~ '
4-
'- !
--v ^ ^^
^^^ -r
TM
--- .i . .
J' -/ ^.*l^ >^:Df, ____
- -
^ -?
?------?-??
---i--(------?-i-- .....------:,;
-^ -\ ^- ,--
_ri o;
--STopic at
2-4.5(-8.5) cm wide without bracts. Bracts with pelta 4-8 mm diam. and 1.5-3
mm thick, flattened or with a low conical knob in the centre, petiole 3 mm
long, 0.5-1 mm wide below and 1.7-2 mm wide in upper part, early deciduous.
Each bract subtends an extremely depressed, hardly discernible branch delimi-
tated by imaginary lines between the petioles of four neighboring bracts.
Branch unisexual or bisexual and then strongly proterogynous. Flowers
embedded in a dense layer of filiform, narrowly clavate hairs, which are 1.8-2
mm long. Male flowers with perianth tubular below and funnelshaped, irregu-
larly crenate to obviously 3-lobed above, 3.5-5 mm long and up to 1 mm wide,
lobes ligulate 1.8 x 0.8 mm. Stamens 3, filaments united into a tubular col-
umn, which again is united with the lower third of the perianth tube; column
2.5-6 mm long and up to 0.3 mm wide. Anthers connate into a 6-locular synan-
drium with the locules longitudinally arranged, 0.8 x 1 mm. A short, conical
structure 0.8 mm long protruding from the receptacle into the base of the
staminal tube might constitute a rudimentary ovary. Female flowers with peri-
anth adnate to ovary, 2 short and broad, lip-like segments protruding above
ovary, compressed with edge generally facing petioles of bracts, 1-1.2 mm long
from base to tip of perianth segments and 0.5-0.6 mm wide, Styles 2, filiform,
1-1.2 mm long, appearing above layer of hairs, caducous; stigma capitellate.
Fruit a small, 1-seeded achene.
lb. Corynaea crassa Hooker f. var sprucei (Eichler) B. Hansen, Bot. Tidsskr.
72:188. 1978.
Corynaea sprucei Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 137. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1:
259. 1889; Harms, Nat Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 322. 1935.
Helosis whymperi Baker f., J. Bot. 28: 161, pi. 297, f. A-E. 1890 synon. nov. Type.
Whympersn, Ecuador (holotype, BM).
Itoasia sprucei (Eichler) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 2: 590. 1891.
BRAZIL. Hubbard sn (K); Moller sn (B); Schiffner & Wettstein sn (M, W). ParanA:Hatsch-
bach 9842 (US); 19606 (C). Santa Catarina: Mueller 340 (K); Smith & Klein 7287 (US). ARGEN-
TINA. Missiones: Grondosa et al 1709 (SI); Krapovickas et al 15509 (C, F, MO, P); Marunak 633
(AK); Schwabe sn (COL). Corrientes: Krapovickas et al 28596 (C, MO).
1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
k.(i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
H L
D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~;~?:~
FIG 19. Species of Lophophytum. A-G, L. leandri (Krapovickas et al 15509) original. A, habit,
tuber were attached to host rot at scar to the left x 0.5; B, male brach, basal end to the right x 3;
C, portion of male branch with distal end upwards, anthers removed but filaments left in natural
position, in the center one male flower with its small upper perianth segment and its large lower
one, two filaments inbetween and the whole flower exceptionally subtended by a clubshaped bract
(compare E-G) x 9; D, two open anthers x 8; E, female branch, basal end to the right, the wid-
of bracts
ened distal ends of bracts subtending female flowers almost concealing these xx 3; F, female branch
female flowers
Balanophoraceae 49
2. Lophophytum weddellii Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 2: 30, 49, t.
9. 1856 emend. B. Hansen; Eichler in DC., Prod. 17: 129. 1873; Engler,
Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 255. 1889; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b:
326. 1935. Fig 20, Fig 6 (pollen), Fig. 21 (distr.).
seen from below x3; G, female flower and its subtending bract x 15. H-M, L. mirabile subsp
bolivianum, H, K-M (Ule sn 1911) I (Weddell 3631) original. H, portion of male branch with distal
end upwards, anthers and most of the filaments lost, upper perianth segment completely reduced
so that one flower is represented by the large lower segment and two stamens (compare C) x 9; I,
two stamens, anthers open x 8; K, portion of female branch, distal end upwards, styles lost x 9;
L, female flower, side view x 12; M, same seen from above, two styles have been inserted in center
of cavity x 12.
50 Flora Neotropica
jF EF H
:,,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U~;
'_:. ..
.'-~.
vc/'
FI2. ohohyu wdceli.,aferHokr . 156, ,C Plwan590ad-
(Sc~~~~~~
~~~~~~hune57)oiia.A ai 05 ,batsbedn nlrsec rnh rn iwo
pett atx ;C h am,sd iw(cmaeFg1,1 n ) ;D
aebrnhbaled
donad;E
rnh
asledt
fml
h ih t x;F,par
ffml rnh aa n
downard
x1; G,femle lowe, sde iew,x15 H,the ame dital artx15
FIG 20. Lophophytum weddel/ii. A, after Hooker f. (1856), B, C (Plowman 5940) and D-H
(Schunke 5675) original. A, habit x 0.5; B, bract subtending inflorescence branch, front view of
peltate part x 1; C, the same, side view (compare Fig 1, 1B and IC) x 1; D, male branch, basal end
downwards x 7; E, female branch, basal end to the right, x 3; F, part of female branch, basal end
downwards x 10; G, female flower, side view, x 15; H, the same, distal part x 15.
Balanophoraceae 51
Hooker f., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 30, 48. 1856 p.p. quoad spec.
Schott; Eichler, Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 26: 551, t. 9, f. 16-18. 1868; in Mar-
tius, Fl. Bras. 4. 2: 46, t. 9-14. 1869; in DC., Prod. 17: 128. 1873; Engler,
Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 255, f. 161A-C, E-K. 1889; Glaziou, Mem.
Soc. Bot. France 1(3): 611. 1913; Hauman & Irigoyen, Anales Mus. Nac.
Hist. Nat. Buenos Aires 32: 58. 1923; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b:
325,f. 164 A-C, E-K, 1935; Falcao, Rodriguesia 25(37): 137. 1966; Ange-
ly, Fl. Anal. e Fitog. Sao Paulo 1: 56. 1969; Falcao, Atas Soc. Biol. Rio
de Janeiro 14: 154. 1971; Martins f., Leandra 2: 99. 1972; Falcao, Fl. II.
Cat. BALA 12. 1975. Fig 19, Fig 7 (pollen), Fig 21 (distr.).
Archimedea pvramidalis Leandro do Sacramento ex A. St.-Hilaire, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ser.
2. 7: 32. 1837 p.p. quoad spec., incl. descr. Type. Leandro do Sacramento sn., Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, not located.
i \f;D taS AL
E
'o
4x ;:
Y_
/I LT~~~~~~~~o
20~
3a. Lophophytummirabilesubspmirabile
..r'
,-I
Stamens with one theca conspicuously shorter than the other, at least in
some of the anthers.
5. Lathrophytum Eichler, Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 26: 550. 1868; in Martius, Fl.
Bras. 4. 2: 64. 1869; in DC., Prod. 17: 130. 1873; Hooker f. in Bentham &
Hooker f., Gen. P1. 3: 239. 1880; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf, ed. 1. 3. 1: 255.
1889; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 328. 1935; Falcao, Rodriguesia
25(37): 139. 1966; Atas Soc. Biol. Rio de Janeiro 14: 153. 1971; Fl. I1.
Cat. BALA 24. 1975; B. Hansen, Bot. Tidsskr. 71: 77. 1976.
Lathrophytium Swart, Ind. Nom. Gen. 1965, orth. mut.
Juelia Asplund, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 22: 273, J: 1-3, t. 3. 1928; Harms, Nat. Pflanzenf.
ed. 2. 16h: 328. 1935; Macbride, Fl. Peru 2: 429. 1936; Pfister, Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepcion
22: 15. 1947; Sleumer, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 272, t. 16-18. 1954.
i ac 70 so so
.5
av
' '
~ S .'*' 5
SINU$SOIALPROJECTION
'-; ... ...; . ^_ !""""''^) '*) / '"**Y/-'^" V1*
0
in
~ I 2 . sriuiono
ahrpyu ipcoti, ] O
mropyu vi laeu,
recr , o
1. Male branches with 10-50 alternate flowers; bracts not hexangular, not obviously imbricate,
sometimes inconspicuous.
2. Bracts inconspicuous, almost clavate with filiform petiole and a short, obtriangular
blade; female part of inflorescence usually 1/4-1/3 the length of male part. 2. O. microlepiN.
2. Bracts conspicuous, peltate with large, variously shaped peltas; female part of inflores-
ence 1/2 the length or more of male part.
3. Bracts with almost terete petiole and ? regularly crenate pelta; female part of inflores-
cence 1/2 the length of or equal to male part. 3. 0. peruvianum.
3. Bracts with a flattened petiole and an irregularlyincised, mostly oblique pelta bearing a
subulate or biforked process in the centre; female part of inflorescence mostly much
longer than male part or inflorescence entirely female. 4. 0. euhierruneum.
I! E
I
i 1
,,/
?
" , .' -.' G"
FIG 24. Species of Ombrophyfum. A-E, 0. violaceurn, A-C (Wurdack 2360) and D, E (Mexia
6337a) after Hansen (1977). A, habit, upper part of inflorescence lost, most female branches lost
x 1; B, peltate bract subtending branch of inflorescence, side view x 6; C, the same, front view of
pelta (compare Fig 1, 2B and 2C) x 6; D, male branch, basal end to the right x 6; E, the same,
seen from distal end x 6. F-K, 0. microlepis (Ule sn 1911) original. F, clavate bract subtending
branch of inflorescence, side view x 18; G, the same, from above x 18; H, the same, front view
x 18; I, male branch, basal end to the right x 4; K, the same, seen from distal end x 4.
60 FloraNeotropica
Ab Ombrophytoperuvianoet Ombrophytoviolaceodiffertbracteolisax-
ium florescentiumlateraliumvalde diminutis,laminis bracteolarumtriangu-
laribus, non peltatis. Ab Ombrophytoviolaceo porro distinctumquod flores
in ramis lateralibusmasculinisplures quam octo sunt, plerumqueusque ad
viginti,et floribusalternantibus,numquamcruciatimoppositis.
Descriptionbased on alcohol material, dried material and color slide.
Whitishto light brownor flesh coloured,monoeciousplants(inflorescencebi-
sexual). Total lengthup to 20 cm. Tuberspheroidal,3-4 cm diam., by a con-
strictionpassinginto a volva, surfaceof both yellowishlight-brown,irregular-
ly verrucoseby smallwarts0.5-1 mm across. Volva up to 6 cm long, narrowly
funnelshaped,violet inside, burstingirregularlyupwards.Inflorescencewith
lower, sterilepart up to 6 cm long, intermediarfemale part up to 4 cm long,
and uppermale partup to 11 cm long, 2.5-3 cm acrossinclusiveof flowers.At
least some of the branchesof the inflorescencesubtendedby an inconspicuous
bract. Bract3-4 mm long with a filiformpetioleabout 3 mm long and 0.3 mm
wide, blade obtriangular,0.7-1 mm long, 1.5 mm wide, and 0.5 mm thick.
Male branches3-7 mm long, 2-3 mm wide, with a peltate, transverselyelliptic
to subcircular,slightlycrenateapicalpart about 4 mm wide. Male flowersup
to 20 in one branch, without a perianth.Stamens2, alternatelyinsertedin
fissureson the branch;filament1-1.2mm long; anther1-2mm long, 0.5-1 mm
wide. Axis of inflorescencebetweenmale branchesdenselymamillate.Pollen
grainsspheroid,tricolporate,P 22.1 Atm,E 22.2 t4m,nuclei2. Femalebranches
about 4 mm long, with peltateapicalpart as in male branches,narrowlower
partdenselycoveredby 50-80flowers.Femaleflowerswhitish,withouta peri-
anth. Ovary about 1 mm long and 0.5-1 mm wide; styles 2, 0.5 mm long,
divergingfrom a shallowpit at the truncateapical part of the ovary;stigmas
capitellate.
Type. Ule sn, Brazil,Acre, Alto Acre, Seringal,S. Francisco,Sept. 1911
(holotype,B).
Distribution.Humid tropicallowland forests in Peru and Brazil(Acre).
Floweringspecimensfrom April, September,Octoberand November. Host
recorded:a bignoniaceousclimber.
PERU. San Martin:Schunke3943 (F). Loreto:Schultes8615 (IAN). BRAZIL.Acre:Hall'
sn, Oct. 1974(photoonly).
i
s,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_ ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r
. .
:' ...
,. 't r fn , "'
.2r tX^
Fi ;4?r
K-~"' .l'
:~~~~~~~~~?.
' = <__~~~~~~~~
s' ?
:".~i[~ ;e. .. ..
Wi2E
t
r,?
'.~;?..
'liY ' ,,
.,-? .
,:'%.-
~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~.,~..!t
i~~.: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,..
;~~~~~~~~~~~
~.~g.
?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,. ::,
..::
?~t.,:
i~~~~~~~~~ij"?tl~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:..::~~~ ','::, t,,.~',..:....~:::,.:.~
.??..:i??
FI 5 mrpyu
icreis,i phot.w F. Hal,rai,Are,
194 Ot
, po. . Hall, 17.<
. .
Brail . . .cre,.. . t.
FIG 25. Ombrophytum microlepis:..~,
62 Flora Neotropica
2. 16b: 328. 1935; Macbride, Fl. Peru 2: 429. 1936; Falcao, Fl. II. Cat.
BALA 6. 1975. Fig 26, Fig 9 (pollen), Fig 27 (distr.).
Omhirophylumlzamioides Weddell, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ser. 3. 14: 184, t. 10. 1850; Eichler,
Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 26: 551, t. 9, f. 11. 1868; in Martius, Fl. Bras. 4. 2: 63, t. 16. 1869; in
DC., Prod. 17: 130. 1873; Engler, Nat. Pflanzenf. ed. 1. 3. 1: 255. 1889; Harms, Nat.
Pflanzenf. ed. 2. 16b: 328. 1935; Macbride, Fl. Peru 2: 429. 1936; Falcao, Fl. II. Cat.
BALA 38. 1975. Type. W'eddellsn, Peru, not extant; the name is typified by Weddell I.e.:
t. 10. 1850.
t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J. K -,
i
I"
it~~~~i
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/~~~~~~:/
a
'-"
64 Flora Neotropica
Juelia lilloana Sleumer, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 276, f. 1-3, t. 18. 1954. Type. Sleumer 3037
Argentina, Catamarca, Mesada de las Rosas, 1600 m. alt., 10.2. 1952 (holotype, LIL).
Jielia meyeri Sleumer, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 276, t. 16, 18. 1954. Type. Meier 17236,
Argentina, Tucuman, Cruz Alta, Los Alderetes cerca del Rio Sali, 430 m. alt., 20.5. 1949
(holotype, LIL).
01mbrophvtum peruvianum auct. non Poeppig & Endlicher: Spegazzini, Anales
Soc. Ci. Argent. 77: 150. 1914; Hauman & Irigoyen, Anales Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Buenos
Aires 32: 59. 1923; Adsersen, Bot. Not. 129: 113. 1976 quoad sp. Galapag.
0"
LI
,,N
"
:A
FIG 28. Ombrophytum sut;errar.um (Adsersenet al 243) original.A, habit x 0.5; B, bractsub-
tendinginflorescencebranch,side view x ; C, the same, front view x 3; D, two bractsfusedto-
getherx 3; E, the same, frontview x 3; F, malebranchseenfromdistalend in naturalpositionon
mamillatesurfaceof the mainaxis x 4; G, the sameremovedfrommainaxis, sideview x 4; H, the
sameseen fromproximalend x 4; I, K, stamensx 10;L, femalebranchin side view, distalend to
theleft x 4; M, the sameseenfromdistalend x 4; N, femaleflowerfromthe side x 15.
Balanophoraceae 67
ranean when flowering, with an astringent taste. I consider all these forms as
belonging in one variable species together with the Galapagos populations.
The morphology of the subtending bracts, of the male and female branches
and particularly their peltately widened apical part is strikingly uniform
throughout the entire distribution area. The variation is mostly found in the
shape and colour of the inflorescences and in the distribution of the sexes,
some individuals being entirely female, others bisexual, even within the same
population (Galapagos). These characters have proved to be most unreliable
for taxonomic purposes in other genera of Balanophoraceae also, e.g. within
Balanophora (Hansen 1972).
Description based on wet and dry specimens. Fleshy root parasites with
yellowish to wine red colors. Tuber in male specimens mostly horizontal and
much elongated, in female specimens shorter and ascending, 0.7-1.9 cm diam.,
more or less pubescent. Inflorescence-bearing stems basally with a 5-8-lobed
volva. Total length from volva inclusive of inflorescence in males 3.1-13 cm, in
females 2-14 cm. Stems with numerous spirally arranged, triangular-lanceo-
late, scaly leaves 0.4-1.0 x 1.6-3.5 cm, margin ciliate. Inflorescences unisexu-
al, not branched; male ones cylindrical, 1.8-3.2 x 2.5-5.0 cm, with flowers ex-
panded; female ones hemispherical, 1.7-5.8 cm wide and 1.4-3.5 cm long.
Male flowers bracteate with a pedicel 6-10 x 1-1.3 mm. Bracts each reduced to
2 conical bodies with a slightly widened tip. Perianth segments 3, valvate,
cucullate, 1.8-1.9 x 1.2-1.5 mm. Stamens connate into a synandrium. Anthers
,1
/1 1'
', . . . .' .
....
...
' ......
'L: ~ _i~ c~
F~~~~~~~~~~~
E `
D~~~~~~~~~
\l ^'"---.
'^*-- -..^----"^~~~~~~~~~~~~
A ?
,-'~ ~ -~-
- ^ *---- - I-
^ g~ -t^^ -- - _
-
...
- * -I 5- - .-.. - -
' ~
*> = :,.. ; t
._,,_ _- . . . . . . /
_ _
'
I - - --' 'l C* 1 '
o_
,. Y' , . 0
.---i--------
~~~~~~~~~~1T'opIc
I
- ....- .... -
/
- . .--:----jM---
* ^r
j - of C
MEXICO. Oaxaca: Liebmann sn (C). COSTA RICA. Heredia: Burger & Stolze 6066 (F,
MO); G6mez 4034 (K). PANAMA. Chiriqui: Allen 4773 (BR, C, F, K, MO, P, S, U, UC); Darien:
Duke 5320 (MO); Gentry & Mori 14019 (MO). COLOMBIA. Karsten sn (P); Purdie sn (K);
Ocanae: Purdie sn (K); Chocb: Core 330a (US); Boyaca: Lawrance 251 (F, NY, US); Cundina-
marca: Cuatrecasas 5429 (US); Jaramillo 2660 (COL); Meta: Grant 10030 (US); El Valle Cauca:
Cuatrecasas et al 6263 (US); Sneidern 1263, 1264 (S); Agustin: Little 7684 (US); Huila: Little 8991
(US); Caqueta: Little 8214 (US). VENEZUELA. Cornelio sn, Avila (US); Merida: Bernardi 969
(NY); Fendler 1743 (BR, F, GOET, K, MO, NY, P, US); Amazonas: Maguire et al 28054 (K, NY,
P, RB, US); 28057 (NY, US); Aragua: Steyermark 89852 (F, K, US); Bolivar: Maguire et al 33832
(F, NY); 33841 (F, IAN, NY, U); 33927 (F, NY); Moore et al 9709 (UC); Stevermark 75657 (NY);
4Wurdack 34062 (NY); 34063 (NY); 34073 (F, MO, NY, UC). GUYANA. Schomburgk sn (BM).
ECUADOR. Imbabura: DrewtE-51 (US); Azuay: Camp 4418 (NY, US); Santiago Zamora: Acosta
Solis 5039 (F); Stevermark 53515 (NY). PERU. San Martin: Schunke 9617 (C); Chachapoyas:
Hutchinson & H'right5551 (US); Huanuco: Wolfe sn (F). BOLIVIA. Mapiri: Buchtien 1641 (US)
Chuquisaca: Orhigny 1188 (BR, P). BRAZIL. Para: Bamps 5198 (BR); Oliveira 145 (US); 196
(IAN); 278 (IAN); 446 (IAN); Silva 2661 (MG); Ceara: Benjamin 9284 (RB); Ducke 1674 (MA);
Ule 9025 (K); Pernambuco: Barreto 8799 (F); Reitz & Klein 7156 (L, M, UC, US); Mato Grosso:
Anderson et al 9754 (C, NY); Argent 6706 (U); Hoehne 3874, 3875, 3876 (R); Hunt & Ramos 6027
(MO); Irwin et al 16560 (GH, NY); 16848 (GH, NY, S); Malmnesn (S); Rojas 3836 (US); Goias:
Duarte 10281 (RB); Heringer 8859 (HB, NY, US); Rizzo 4706 (RB); Schwarzmayersn (SP); Bahia:
Duarte 9568 (RB); Minas Gerais: Anderson et al 8419 (NY); Claussen 1410, 1411 (P); Heringer &
Britoni 6974 (HB); Lund sn (BR); Macedo 2337 (MO, NY, SP, US); Mosen 4404 (C, S); Regnell sn
(BR); Reinhardt sn (C); St. Hilaire sn (P); Warmingsn (C); Espirito Santo: Luetzelburg sn (M);
Sao Paulo: Hashitnoto 150 (SP); Hoehne 27517 (GH, K, NY, S, SP, US); Loefgren 2513 (SP);
Sucre 3052 (RB); Rio de Janeiro: Baumbart sn (HB); Langsdorff sn (H, LE); Martius sn (M);
Miers sn (BM, K); Pabst 7301 (HB); Schott sn (W); Parana: Hatschbach 20771 (C).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank the directors and curators of the herbaria consulted
or from which material was borrowed. The herbaria are AAU, AK, B, BBS,
BM, BR, C, CAY, COL, F, FI, GB, GH, GOET, GZU, H, HB, IAN, INPA,
K, L, LE, LIL, M, MEXU, MG, MO, NY, P, R, RB, S, SI, SP, U, UC, US,
W. Photographs and colour slides were kindly put at my disposal by H. Adser-
sen, W. C. Burger, T. B. Croat, A. Gentry, L. D. G6mez, F. Halle, N. Halle,
G. Harling, J. P. Hjerting, L. Holm-Nielsen, L. Nevling, T. Plowman, B.
Sparre, R. T. Thorne, and J. J. Wurdack; I am most grateful for this invalu-
able cooperation.
For help and advice I am much indebted to K. Engell, who checked the
embryological and anatomical information, A. Fox Maule, who prepared the
latin diagnosis and G. Prance, who carefully read the manuscript and cor-
rected the language.
I am especially grateful to the artist, Mrs. Victoria Friis, who prepared the
original line drawings in Figs 10, 11, 15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 28 and 29, mostly from
dried or alcohol-preserved material, and in a few cases by copying selected
illustrations, the source of which is always cited. Illustrations from Hansen
1976a and 1977 are by Bent Johnsen.
SEM-investigations were carried out with a Cambridge instrument by J.
Fuglsang Nielsen at the Institute of Historical Geology and Palaeontology,
University of Copenhagen. LM-investigations by means of a Leitz Dialux-
72 FloraNeotropica
LITERATURE CITED
Adsersen, H. 1976. Ombrophytum peruvianurn (Balanophoraceae) found in the Galapagos Is-
lands. Bot. Not. 129: 113-117.
Asplund, E. 1928. Eine neue Balanophoraceen-gattung aus Bolivien. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 22: 261-
277, fig. 1-3, t. 3.
Baker, E. G. 1890. New plants from the Andes. J. Bot. 28: 161-162, pl. 297.
Beccari, 0. 1869. Illustrazione di nuove specie di piante bornensi. Balanophoreae. Nuovo Giorn.
Bot. Ital. 1: 65-84, t. 2-4.
Blume, C. L. 1828. Flora Javae 1-2: 1-24, pl. 1-6. Bruxelles.
Browne, P. 1756. The civil and natural history of Jamaica 1-503, t. 1-49, London.
Dahlgren, R. 1975. A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the
distribution of characters. Bot. Not. 128: 119-147,fig. 1-2.
Eichler, A. W. 1867. Sur la structure de la fleur femelle de quelques Balanophorees. Act. Congr.
Int. Bot. Paris 137-155, t. 1-2.
. 1869. Balanophoreae. In Martius, Fl. Bras. 4.2: 1-74, t. 1-16.
. 1873. Balanophoraceae. In DC., Prod. 17: 117-150.
Endlicher, S. L. 1836. Rhizantheae. In Gen. Plant. 72.
Engler, A. 1889. Balanophoraceae. In Engler & Prantl, Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien ed. 1. 3.
1: 243-263,fig. 156-167.
Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy, angiosperms 1-539. Stockholm.
Fagerlind, F. 1938a. Bau und Entwicklung der floralen Organe von Helosis cayennensis. Svensk
Bot. Tidskr. 32(2): 139-159.
. 1938b. Ditepalanthus, eine neue Balanophoraceen-gattung aus Madagaskar. Ark.
Bot. 29A. 7: 1-15,fig. 1-5.
1945a. Bildung und Entwicklung des Embryosacks bei sexuellen und agamo
spermischen Balanophora-arten. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 39: 65-82.
. 1945b. Blute und Blutenstand der Gattung Balanophora. Bot. Not. 1945(4): 330-
350.
. 1945c. Bau der floralen Organe bei der Gattung Langsdorffia. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.
39: 197-210.
. 1948. Bau und Entwicklung der vegetativen Organe von Balanophora. Kongl.
Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 25(3): 1-72.
Falcio, W. F. de A. 1975. Balanoforaceas. In Fl. I1. Cat. BALA 1-43.
Geesink, R. 1972. A new species of Langsdorffia from New Guinea (Balanophoraceae). Acta Bot.
Neerl. 21: 102-106,fig. 1.
Govindappa, D. A. & G. R. Shivamurthy. 1975. The pollination mechanism in Balanophora
abbreviata Blume. Ann. Bot. 39: 977-978, pi. 1.
_ 1976. "Seed" germination in Balanophora abbreviata. Phytomorphology 26: 135-
138,fig. 1-2.
Griffith, W. 1845. On the root-parasites referred to Rhizantheae. Trans. Linn. Soc. London 19:
303-347, t. 34-39.
Hansen, B. 1972. The genus Balanophora J. R. & G. Forster. A taxonomic monograph. Dansk
Bot. Ark. 28. 1: 1-188, fig. 1-44, t. 1-6, pl. 1-8.
. 1976a. Lathrophytum peckoltii Eichl. emend. B. Hansen (Balanophoraceae).
Bot. Tidsskr. 71: 75-79,fig. 1-2.
. 1976b. Pollen and stigma conditions in the Balanophoraceae s. lat. Bot. Not.
129: 341-345,fig. 1, 1. 1.
. 1977. Ombrophytum violaceum B. Hansen sp. nov. (Balanophoraceae). Bot.
Tidsskr. 71: 231-236,fig. 1-3.
. 1978. Changes in rank within Helosis and Corynaea (Balanophoraceae). Bot.
Tidsskr. 72: 188.
& K. Engell. 1978. Inflorescences in Balanophoroideae, Lophophytoideae and Scy-
balioideae (Balanophoraceae). Bot. Tidsskr. 72: 177-187, fig. 1-8.
Harms, H. 1935. Balanophoraceae. In Engler & Prantl, Die nattirliche Pflanzenfamilien ed. 2.
16b: 296-339, fig. 154-170.
Heinricher, E. 1907. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gattung Balanophora. Sitzungsber. Kaiserl. Akad.
Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Cl., Abt. 1. llb(l): 439-465.
74 Flora Neotropica
Hooker, J. D. 1856. On the structure and affinities of Balanophoreae. Trans Linn. Soc. London
22: 1-68,pl. 1-16.
. 1880. Balanophoraceae. In Benth. & Hook. f., Gen. Plant. 3: 232-239. London.
Howard, R. A. 1959. The Balanophoraceae in the Caribbean flora. Rhodora 61: 79-81.
Junghuhn, F. 1841. Uber Javan'sche Balanophoreen. Nova Acta Phys.-Med. Acad. Caes. Leop.-
Carol. Nat. Cur. 18(Suppl. 1): 202-228.
Klotzsch, J. F. 1847. Balanophoreae C. Richard, Bartling, Schott, Endlicher, R. Brown. Linnaea
20:460-461.
Knuth, P. 1904. Balanophoraceae. In Handbuch der Bliitenbiologie 3. 1: 260-265. Leipzig.
Kuijt, J. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants 1-246. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Lanjouw, J. 1932. Balanophoraceae. In A. Pulle, Fl. Suriname 1. 1: 45-46. Amsterdam
Lemee, A. 1955. Balanophoracees. In Fl. Guy. Franc. 1: 545. Paris.
Le6n, H. & H. Alain. 1951. Balanoforaceas. In Fl. Cuba 2: 82-84,fig. 31. La Habana.
Liebmann, F. M. 1847. Over nye rodparasiter henhorende til Balanophorernes, Cytineernes, Oro-
banchineernes og Monotropieernes familier. Forhandl. Skand. Naturf. 4. Moede 1844: 177-
187.
Lotsy, J. P. 1901. Rhopalocnemis phalloides Jungh. a morphological-systematical study. Ann.
Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg 17: 73-101, pi. 3-14.
Macbride, J. F. 1936. Balanophoraceae. In Fl. Peru 2: 427-431. Chicago.
Mangenot, G. 1947. Recherches sur l'organisation d'une Balanophoracee: Thonningia coccinea
Vahl. Rev. Gen. Bot. 54: 201-244, 271-294,fig. 1-39.
Martius, C. F. P. 1818. Uber eine neue Brasilianische Pflanzengattung in W. E. de Eschwege.
J. Bras. 2: 178-191, t. 5.
. 1832. Balanophoraceae. In Nov. Gen. Spec. Plant. 3: 181-188, pi. 298-300.
Munchen.
Moore, L. B. 1940. The structure and life-history of the root parasite Dactylanthus taylorii Hook.
f. New Zealand J. Sci. Technol. 21: 206B-224B.
Nevling, L. 1. Jr. 1960. Balanophoraceae. In Fl. Panama. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 47: 303-308,
fig. 87-89.
Poeppig, E. F. 1833. Ombrophytum. In Leipz. Litteraturz. 1833: 1874.
& S. L. Endlicher. 1838. Ombrophytum peruvianum. In Nov. Gen. Spec. Plant.
2: 40-41, t. 155.
Richard, L. C. 1822. Memoire sur une nouvelle famille des plantes, les Balanophorees. Mem.
Mus. Hist. Nat. 8: 404-435, t. 19-21.
Saint-Hilaire, A. 1837. Description du nouveau genre Archimedea. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ser. 2. 7:
31-33.
Schott, H. & S. L. Endlicher. 1832. Balanophoreae. In Melet. Bot. 1-13, t. 1-2. Wien.
Sleumer, H. 1954. Die Balanophoraceen Argentiniens. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 271-280, fig. 1-3,
t. 16-18.
Solms-Laubach, H. 1867-1868. Uber den Bau und Entwicklung der Ernahrungsorgane parasiti-
scher Phanerogamen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 6: 509-638.
Sprengel, C. 1826. Helosis. In Syst. Veg. 3: 765. Gottingen.
Standley, P. C. 1930. Balanophoraceae. In Fl. Yucatan 250. Chicago.
1931. Balanophoraceae. In Fl. Lanc. Valley Honduras 178. Chicago.
1937. Balanophoraceae. In Fl. Costa Rica 409-410. Chicago.
& S. J. Record. 1936. Balanophoraceae. In The forests and flora of British Hon-
duras 123. Chicago.
& J. A. Steyermark. 1946. Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana 24(4): 1-493.
Steenis, C. G. G. J. van. 1932. Some remarks on the genus Rhopalocnemis Junghuhn. Handel. 6.
Nederl.-Ind. Natuurwet. Congr. 1931: 464-473.
Steyermark, J. A. 1957. Balanophoraceae. In Contr. Flora Venezuela. Fieldiana 28: 898.
Swartz, O. P. 1788. Cynomorium. In Nov. Gen. & Spec. Plant. 12. Stockholm, Uppsala, Abo.
. 1797. Cynomorium. In Fl. Ind. Occ. 11-14. Erlangen.
Trattinick, B. L. 1828. In D.F.L. von Schlechtendahl, Nachtrag zu der Ichtyosma wehdemanni.
Linnaea 3: 196-197.
Umiker, 0. 1920. Entwicklungsgeschichtlichzytologische Untersuchungen an Helosis guyanensis
Rich. Dissertation Zurich 1-54. Freiburg.
Balanophoraceae 75
Weddell, H. A. 1850. Considerations sur l'organe reproducteur femelle des Balanophor6es et des
Rafflesiac6es. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. S6r. 3. 14: 166-187.
Zweifel, R. 1939. Cytologisch-embryologische Untersuchungen an Balanophora abbreviata Blume
und Balanophora indica Wall. Vierteljahrsschr. Naturf. Ges. Zurich 84: 245-306, fig. 1-16, t.
1-4.
2. Helosis
1. a. H. cayennensis(Sw.) Spr.varcayen- 5. Lathrophytum
nensis 1. L. peckoltii Eichl.
1. b. H. cayennensis(Sw.) Spr.varmexi-
cana(Liebm.)B. Hansen 6. Ombrophytum
1. 0. violaceum B. Hansen
3. Corynaea 2. 0. microlepis B. Hansen
1. a. C. crassaHook.f. varcrassa 3. 0. peruvianum Poepp. & Endl.
1. b. C. crassaHook.f. var sprucei(Eichl.) 4. 0. subterraneum (Asplund) B. Hansen
B. Hansen
4. Lophophytum 7. Langsdorffia
1. L. leandriEichl. 1. L. hypogaea Mart.
76 Flora Neotropica
LIST OF EXSICCATAE
Acosta Solis, M., 5039(7-1); 5070 (3-1); Croat, T. B., 18824 (2-la)
5837 (1-1) Croat, T. B. et al, 16158 (2-lb)
Adsersen, H. et al., 243 (6-4); 244 (6-4); Crueger, H., sn (2-la)
1323 (6-4) Cuatrecasas, J., 5429 (7-1); 6263 (7-1);
Alexander, R. C., sn (1-3) 11851 (3-1); 19121 (3-1)
Alleizette, C. d', 6363 (2-lb) Curran, H. M., sn (2-la); 22 (4-3a);
Allen, P. H., 4773 (7-1) 334 (2-la); 414 (2-la)
Alston, A. H. G., 7819 (2-la)
Anderson, W. R. et al, 3117 (1-3); 7412 (1-2) Daniels, A. G. H. et al, 733 (2-la);
8419 (7-1); 9754 (7-1) 1134 (2-la); 1277 (2-la)
Araujo, D. et al, 204 (2-la); 523 (2-la) Dressier, R. L. et al, 38 (2-lb)
Argent, G. C. G., 6706 (7-1) Drew, W. B., E-51 (7-1)
Asplund, E., 2568 (6-4); 3873 (6-4); Duarte, A. P., 9568 (7-1); 10281 (7-1)
6312 (6-4); 10010 (3-la); 14226 (2-la) Ducke, A., 1674 (7-1); 3462 (2-la);
Austin, et al, 4137 (2-la) 3561 (2-la); 3632 (2-la); 6875 (2-la);
7595 (2-la)
Balansa, B., 2717 (4-3b) Duke, J. A., 5320 (7-1); 13621 (2-la)
Baldwin, J. T., 3302 (2-la) Dungs, F., sn (1-4)
Bamps, P., 5198 (7-1) Duss, A., 2106 (2-lb)
Barclay, H. G. et al, 10325 (3-1) Dwyer, J. D., 11696 (2-la)
Barreto, NI., 7431 (4-3a); 8799 (7-1)
Barriga, H. G., 8395 (2-la); 14700 (2-la) Eggers, H. von, 1620 (1-3)
Baumbart, 1., sn (7-1) Egler, W. A. et al, 46697 (2-la)
Beaman, 6185 (2-lb) Eiten, G. et al., 3094 (1-2); 3173 (1-2)
Benjamin, D. S., 9284 (7-1) Ekman, E. L., 2653 (1-3); 3348 (1-3);
Berlin, B., 404 (2-la); 457 (2-la) 3877(1-3); 5113 (1-3); 9037 (1-3);
Bernardi, A. L., 969 (7-1); 3347 (2-la) 10581 (1-3); 14285 (1-3)
Bertero, C. G. L, sn (1-3) Eliasson, U., 13 (2-lb)
Black, G. A. et al, 957 (2-la); 1410 (2-la); Emmerich, M., sn (4-3a)
2039 (2-la); 2388 (2-la); 2961 (2-1a); Ernani, sn (2-1a)
3416 (2-la); 8423 (2-la); 8584 (2-la) Ewan, J. A., 16075 (1-1); 16544 (3-lb)
Bourgeau, E., 3030 (2-lb)
Brade, A. C., 18909 (1-4) Fendler, A., sn (2-la); 1743 (7-1); 1744 (7-1)
Breedlove, D. E., 22479 (2-la) Fereira, 221 (2-la)
Brenes, A. M., 12638 (2-1a) Ferreyra, R., 3401 (2-la)
British Guiana For. Dept., 6170 (2-la); Florschutz, P. A. et al, 2545 (2-la);
6353 (2-1a) 2604 (2-la); 2863 (2-la); 2942 (2-la)
Britton, N. L. et al, 2780 (1-3) Forero, E., 1049 (3-1); 1051 (3-la)
Broadway, W. E., 799 (2-la); 6434 (2-la); Fosberg, F. R., 20923 (3-1); 21151 (3-1);
6568 (2-la) 21518 (1-1); 21520 (2-la)
Buchtien, O., 1641 (7-1)
Burger, W. C. et al, 6060 (3-1b); 6066 (7-1) Gehrt, A., sn (1-2)
Gentry, A. et al, 14018 (2-1a); 14019 (7-1)
Cabezas, V., SI 20263 (6-4); SI 20341 (6-4) Giovanni, F., 36 (2-la)
Camp, W. H., 4295 (3-lb); 4418 (7-1) Glaziou, A. F. M., sn (4-3a); sn (5-1);
Castafeda, R. R., 4054 (2-la) N. 306 (4-3a); 4070a (1-2); 4070b (1-4);
Cavalcante, P. B., 2261 (2-la); 3205 (2-la) 4700 (1-4); 4969a (2-la)
Chagas, J., INPA 3122 (2-la); INPA Golbach, R., sn (4-3b)
3553 (2-la); INPA 6309 (2-la) Gollmer, J., sn (3-lb)
Claussen, P., 1410 (7-1); 1411 (7-1) G6mez, L. D., 4034 (7-1); 786722 (3-lb)
Clement, A. C. T., sn (1-3) Goudot, J., sn (3-lb); 140 (2-lb)
Coppois, G., sn (6-4) Grant, M. L. et al, 9311 (3-1); 9701 (3-1);
Core, E. L., 330a (7-1); 331a (3-la); 10029 (3-lb); 10030 (7-1)
332a (3-1) Granville, J. J. de, C 72 (2-la); 2164 (2-la)
Cornelio, sn (7-1) Grondona, E. et al, 1709(4-1)
Cowan, R. S. et al, 2005 (2-la); 39116 (2-la) Guedes, T., 2298 (2-la)
Balanophoraceae 77
Pabst, G. F. J., 5416 (4-3a); 7301 (7-1) Schneider, M., 612 (3-1a)
Parker, K. et al, 37b (6-4) Schnell, 12239 (2-1a)
Peckolt, Th., sn (4-3a); sn (5-1); sn (1-4); Schomburgk, M. R., sn (7-1)
sn (5-1) Schott, H. W., sn (7-1); sn (1-2)
Pelaes, sn (2-lb) Schrink, sn (1-3)
Pereira, E., 5645 (5-1) Schultes, R. E., 6197 (2-la); 6323 (2-la);
Pfister, A., sn (6-4) 6657 (2-1a); 6829 (2-la); 8117 (2-la);
Pflanz, K., 8 (4-3b) 8615 (6-2); 12091a (2-la)
Philipson, W. R., 1253 (1-3); 1254 (1-3) Schulz, J. P. 10287 (2-la)
Pickel, B., 3423 (1-2) Schunke, J., 3943 (6-2); 5675 (4-2); 9617 (7-1)
Pinto, P. et al, 918 (2-la) Schwabe, W., sn (4-1)
Pires, F. D. de A., sn (2-lb) Schwarzmayer, S., sn (7-1)
Pires, J. M. et al, 1239 (2-1a); 4511 (2-1a); Seibert, R. J., 469 (2-la)
14521 (2-la) Shafer, J. A., 8858 (1-3)
Pittier, H., 1531 (1-1); 9900 (2-1a) Shepard, R. S., 246 (6-4)
Planchon, J. E., sn (4-3a) Sick, H., B 783 (2-la)
Plowman, T., 4688 (3-lb); 5940 (4-2) Silva, M., 1241 (2-la); 2661 (7-1)
Plowman, T. et al, 2345 (2-la); 4934 (2-la) Silva, M. F., 689 (2-la)
Poeppig, E., sn ill. (6-3) Simpson, D. R. et al, 660 (2-la)
Prance, G. T. et al, 2764 (2-la); 3589 (2-1a: Sintenis, P., 4238 (1-3)
4457 (2-la); 5804 (2-la); 7664 (6-3); Skutch, A. F., 2669 (2-lb)
7833 (2-1a); 8080 (2-1a); 8513 (2-1a); Sleumer, H., 3054 (6-4); 3331 (6-4)
8765 (2-la); 9370 (2-la); 10200 (2-1a); Smith, L. B., 1777 (1-4)
10499 (2-1a); 10819 (2-1a); 13565 (2-la: Smith, L. B. et al, 7287 (4-1)
14391 (2-la); 15787 (2-la); 16309 (2-la; Sneidern, K. von, 1263 (7-1); 1264 (7-1)
24212 (2-la); 24410 (2-la); 25483 (2-la; Snethlage, E. H., 231 (2-la)
55899 (2-la) Sparre, B., 13049 (6-1); 14338 (3-lb);
Pringle, C. G. , 5050 (2-lb) 16947 (3-lb); 19070 (2-la)
Proctor, G. R., 9341 (1-3); 17764 (2-1b); Splitgerber, F. L., 728 (2-1a)
21465 (1-3) Spruce, R., 151 (2-la); 574 (2-la); 877 (2-la);
Purdie, W., sn (1-3); sn (1-1); sn (7-1); 1129 (2-la); 5186 (3-lb)
sn (7-1); sn (2-lb); sn (3-la); sn (3-la); Stahel, G., 803 (2-la); 4659 (2-la)
sn (2-la) Standley, P. C., 54815 (2-la)
Purpus, C. A., 2750 (2-lb); 5896 (2-lb); Stern, W. L. et al, 737 (2-la)
7691 (2-lb) Steyermark, J. A., 39584 (2-1a); 46131 (2-1a);
46801 (2-lb); 51848 (2-1b); 52634 (1-1);
Ramage, G. A., sn (2-lb) 53515 (7-1); 55247 (3-1); 75657 (7-1);
Regnell, A. F., sn (1-2); sn (7-1) 86840 (2-1a); 88983 (2-1a); 89372 (2-1a);
Reinhardt, J. Th., sn (7-1) 89838 (2-la); 89852 (7-1)
Reitz, R. et al, 7156 (7-1); 7328 (2-lb); St.-Hilaire, A., sn (7-1)
17353 (2-lb) Sucre, D., 3052 (7-1); 10218 (4-3a)
Richard, L. C., sn (2-la) Swartz, O. P., sn (1-3)
Ridley, H. N., sn (1-3)
Riedel, L., sn (2-1a) Taylor, N., 219 (1-3)
Rizzo, 4706 (7-1) Teunissen, P. A., 12951 (2-1a)
Robyns, W. et al, sn (2-la) Triana, J. J., sn (3-lb)
Rodrigues, W. A., 8347 (2-la) Troll, K., 99 (6-4)
Rojas, 3836 (7-1) Tuerckheim, 700 (1-3); 1044 (2-lb);
Ruiz, H., sn (2-la) 2657 (1-3); 8576 (2-la)
Rusby, H. H., 256 (3-lb)
Rusby, H. H. et al, 105 (2-la) Ule, E., sn (6-1); sn (6-2); sn (4-3b);
948 (2-lb); 6069 (2-la); 9025 (7-1)
Sander & Co., sn (4-2)
Sandwith, N. Y., 620 (2-la) Venturi, 6612 (4-3b)
Sarakhan, J., 1985 (2-la) Viirsoo, sn (6-4); sn (6-4)
Castre, C., 1518 ( --a); 1635 (2-la)
Schiffner, et al, 698 (4-1) Walker, J. W., 449 (2-lb)
Schipp, W. A., 719 (2-lb); 1129 (2-la) Ward, 8629 (2-la)
Balanophoraceae 79
Archimedea45 subterranea 62
pyramidalis46, 51 Langsdorsfia 67
Balanophoroideae (subfam.)67 hypogaea 68
Caldasia33 janeirensis 68
brasiliensis37 moritziana 68
cayennensis37 rubiginosa 68
mexicana40 Lathrophytium 54
Corynaea41 Lathrophytum 54
crassa42 peckoltii 54
varcrassa44 Latraeophila 33
varsprucei44 Lepidophytum 45
purdiei42 Lophophytoideae (subfam.) 45
sphaerica42 Lophophytum 45
sprucei44 bolivianum 52
Cynomorium leandri 46
cayennense35 mirabile 49
coccineumauct. 28 subsp bolivianum 52
jamaicense28 subsp mirabile 52
Ditepalanthus33 mirabile auct. 46
Exorhopala33 weddellii 49
Helosideae(tribus)32 Ombrophytum 55
Helosidoideae(subfam.)24 microlepis 60
Helosieae(tribus)31 peruvianum 60
Helosis33 peruvianum auct. 58, 60, 64
Helosisauct.41 subterraneum 62
brasiliensis36 ulei 58
cayennensis35 violaceum 58
varcayennensis38 zamioides 62
varmexicana40 Phyllocoryne 24
guyanensis36 jamaicensis 28
formaandicola40 Rhopalocnemis 33
varandicola40 Scybalieae (tribus) 24
formabrasiliensis37 Scybalioideae (subfam.) 24, 45
jamaicensis28 Scybalium 24
mexicana40 depressum 25
varandicola40 fungiforme 27
mexicanaauct. 37 glaziovii 29
whymperi44 jamaicense 28
Itoasia41 Senftenbergia 67
crassa42 Sphaerorhizon 24
purdiei42 curvatum 25
sphaerica42 depressum 25
sprucei44 Thonningia
Juelia56 Thonningia auct. 67
lilloana64 janeirensis 68
meyeri64 mexicana 68