Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

A quasi-experimental study to assess the effectiveness of

early ambulation in post-operative recovery among post-caesarean


mothers admitted in selected areas of Nehru Hospital, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Harmanjyot Kaur, Sukhjit Kaur, Pooja Sikka
Abstract: A mother who has been delivered by caesarean section has a dual role in both
post-operative care as well as maternal care. Mothers undergoing Caesarean need more care and
attention than mothers undergoing normal vaginal delivery. The current study was undertaken with the
objective to assess the effect of early ambulation on post-operative recovery among post caesarean
mothers. The Study design was quasi-experimental. Total 80 subjects were enrolled by total
enumerative sampling technique, 40 in each experiment and control group. Subjects in experiment
group were early ambulated at 6 hours of caesarean section covering a distance of 40 meters whereas
control group was ambulated as per routine care i.e. after 13-14 hours of caesarean section. Post-
operative recovery was assessed in both the groups by structured nursing assessment sheet including
intensity of pain perceived by post caesarean mother before and after ambulation, use of analgesics
after ambulation, duration of catheterization, self-void after removal of catheter, passage of first flatus,
initiation of oral intake and breast-feeding and holding baby independently. Pain score was assessed
with numerical pain rating scale. Results showed that there was significant difference between the
mean post-operative pain score after ambulation among experimental and control group as shown by
Independent t-test (p<0.05).Other aspects of Post-operative recovery were compared between
experiment and control group by independent t-test. This difference was statistically significant in all
the variables except duration of catheterization as per the independent t-test (p<0.05). So, it was
concluded that early ambulation was effective in postoperative recovery among post caesarean
mothers.
Keywords Introduction
Early ambulation, Post caesarean mother, The well being of societies linked to the
Postoperative recovery. health and survival of mothers and children.
When mothers survive and thrive, their
children survive and thrive as well and the
Correspondence at societies in which they live prosper. The
survival and well-being of mothers and
Sukhjit Kaur children are not only important in their own
Clinical Instructor,
National Institute of Nursing Education (NINE),
self, but are also central to solving much
PGIMER, Chandigarh broader economic, social and developmental

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 33


challenges. Health of a women is not a A Caesarean section is a surgical
merely a state of physical well being but also procedure in which incision is made through
an expression of many roles they play as mother's abdomen (laparotomy) and uterus
wives, mothers and health care providers in (hysterectomy) to deliver one or more babies
1
the family. , or, rarely, to remove a dead fetus. It is
Childbirth is viewed as an important life usually performed when a vaginal delivery
event. It is a natural, normal physiological would put the baby's or mother's life or
phenomenon which introduces new health at risk. 6 The Origin of the name is
experiences in a women's reproductive life. unclear, but believed to be named for Julius
The child birth events have a great Caesar, because this surgical procedure was
physiological, emotional and social impact used at the time of his birth. It may have been
2
on a women and her family. She experiences so named because of law, enacted under
stress, physiological pain and fear of dangers Julius Caesar's rule, which required this form
related to bleeding, operative procedures like of birth, when a mother was sick or dying.
caesarean section and possibility of loss of The incidence of caesarean section is
life. Mc Donald also pointed out that steadily rising. However, rates between five
emotional factors might influence percent to ten percent are best but during the
reproductive events, including obstetric last decade there has been two to three fold
complications such as eclampsia, prolonged increase in these incidences from the initial
labour and puerperal depression etc. The rate of about 10%. The World Health
care giver should be tactful, sensitive, and Organization (WHO) recommends that
3
respectful to her. caesarean sections rates should not go
7
Vaginal delivery of a full term normal above 15% in any country. Absolute
pregnancy is a natural physiological process. indications for caesarean section are post
In caesarean section the specific needs of the caesarean pregnancy, failure to progress in
mother are much more than in the normal labour, malpresentations , ante partum
child birth. Caesarean section can be in the hemorrhage , fetal distress, cephalopelvic
form of planned elective or an emergency disproportion, PIH and other high risk
8
procedure. Physical, physiological, pregnancies and foetus.
psychological and socio cultural factors are The post-operative course of a patient
the various kinds of stressors experienced by undergone Caesarean section may be
each woman who undergoes caesarean described in terms of varying from
section.4 uneventful to extreme distress. Some
Caesarean section is an operation with mothers experience Deep venous
many risks, less than a century ago. Today, it thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism, Urinary
is one of the most frequently performed tract infection, Urinary retention, Chest
surgeries in the world. Caesarean births are infection, constipation and psychological
more common than most surgeries due to problems in post-operative period.
many factors. One factor, of course, is that Symptoms such as fatigue, headache, lack of
nearly 50% of the world population is sleep, anaemia, urinary infection and other
women, and pregnancy is still a very conditions needing treatment in the first 8
common condition.
5 weeks after delivery are higher in women

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 34


who delivered by caesarean section than Room. The study population was post
9
those who underwent vaginal delivery. caesarean mothers (18-40 years) with 32
So by preventive and promotive post- weeks to 41weeks of gestational age and
operative care the women can be helped to undergoing caesarean section with spinal
avoid the post-operative problems and anaesthesia during the month of July and
complications, which can help in early August, 2013. The subjects were recruited by
recovery. One of the important aspects of total enumerative sampling technique.
comprehensive post-operative care can be Women were consecutively allotted into
planned early ambulation. Planned early experiment (group I) and control (group II)
ambulation means that patients can be out of groups by Block randomization i.e. women
bed as early as possible based on type of undergoing during caesarean section were
surgery. Early ambulation after surgery as a
allotted in experimental group and similarly
newer concept raises medical interest and
enthusiasm.10 The goal of this concept is to women undergoing during caesarean
optimize the post-operative management of section in control group. Each group had 40
the patient in order to reduce morbidity, to patients after excluding high risk factors like
enhance recovery of the patient after a caesarean section under general
surgical procedure, to reduce hospital stay anaesthesia, mothers on magnesium
and to reduce the costs. Thus studies have s u l p h a t e t h e r a p y, m o t h e r s w i t h
showed that ambulation plays a great role in cardiovascular problems. Data was collected
early post-operative recovery among post- after getting permission from head of the
caesarean mothers department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Objectives and ethical Clearance from Institute ethical
To assess the effects of early committee. The study was carried out in
ambulation on post-operative recovery three steps: Development of procedure and
among post caesarean mothers tools, Intervention (early ambulation), and
Assessment of postoperative recovery.
Materials and Methods
Firstly, protocol was developed for providing
A quasi experimental design was early ambulation i.e. walking a distance of 40
employed to study the effect of early meters at 6 hours of caesarean section. The
ambulation on post-operative recovery tools for data collection were: Interview
among post caesarean mothers. Null schedule which included identification date,
hypothesis (H0) formulated was that: There Numerical pain rating scale, Structured
was no effect of early ambulation on post- nursing assessment sheet for assessing
operative recovery among post caesarean post-operative recovery in terms of use of
mothers at 0.05 level of significance. analgesia after ambulation, duration of
The study was conducted in Labour catheterization, self-void after removal of
room, Maternity and Gynae ward of Nehru catheter, passage of first flatus, initiation of
Hospital, PGIMER, Chandigarh .Study oral intake and breast-feeding and holding
subjects were selected from the mothers the baby independently .The tools and
undergoing caesarean section in Labour protocol were developed through review of
Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 35
relevant literature and validated by experts ambulation, duration of catheterization, self-
from field of nursing and department of void after removal of catheter, passage of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology. After validation first flatus, initiation of oral intake and breast-
of tool pilot study was conducted in labour feeding and holding baby independently
room of PGIMER, Chandigarh for assessing soon after ambulation.
feasibility of the study. Results of the pilot The data was analyzed using
study indicated that study was feasible. descriptive and inferential statistics. Analysis
Study subjects were selected and after was carried out with the help of statistical
taking the written informed consent. They package for social sciences (SPSS-16)
were explained about the purpose of the program. The findings were interpreted and
study and were told that data so collected will presented with the help of tables and graphs.
be kept confidential & will be used only for Results
research purpose. They were given full
As per socio demographic data
autonomy to participate in the study. After
summarized in the Table 1, majority of the
recruiting the subjects for the study, socio-
subjects in both the groups were in the age
demographic details were collected.
group of 24-29 year i.e. 62.5% in
In experiment group after explaining, experimental group and 57.5% in control
the subjects were ambulation early i.e. after 6 group with the mean age of 26.7 ± 3.65 years
hours of caesarean section. Post-operative in experimental group and 26.4 ± 3.90 years
Pain score was assessed before and in the control group. In experimental group
immediately after ambulating the mothers. 45% subjects were matriculate and in control
Whereas Subjects of control group were group 37.5%were graduate and above. Most
assessed without intervention with normal of the subjects in both groups were not
routine care i.e. ambulation at 13-14 hours working i.e. 65% in experimental and 80% in
after caesarean section as usually practical control group. In experimental group 70% of
in labour room. The subjects (experimental & subjects belonged to Hindu religion 52.5% in
control group) were kept under observation control group. Most of the subjects in both
throughout the procedure and monitored for the groups had joint family i.e. 77.5% in
any discomfort. Interview schedule was used experimental group and 70 % in control
to collect the information related to group. Both the groups were found to be
caesarean section details and baby details. homogenous in nature in terms of age,
Subjects were assessed after the ambulation education, occupation, religion and type of
of caesarean section with the help of family of the subjects as per chi-square test
structured assessment sheet for intensity of (p> 0.05).
post-operative pain, use of analgesics after

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 36


Table 1: Distribution of subjects as per Socio Demographic variables
N=80
2
Variables Experiment group Control group X
(n1=40) (n2=40) df
f (%) f (%) p value
Age category (in years)*
18-23 7(17.5) 9(22.5) 0.333
24-29 25(62.5) 23(57.5) 2
≥30 8(20.0) 8(20.0) 0.846
Education
Primary 5(12.5) 4(10.0) 6.74
Matric 18(45.0) 12(30.0) 3
10+2 12(30.0) 9(22.5) .081
Graduate and above 5(12.5) 15(37.5)
Occupation 2.257
Working 14(35.0) 8(20.0) 1
Not working 26(65.0) 32(80.0) 0.133
Type of family .581
Joint 31(77.5) 28(70.0) 1
Nuclear 9(22.5) 12(30.0) 0.446
Religion 4.38
Hindu 30(75.0) 21(52.5) 1
Sikh and others 10(25) 19(47.5) 0.136

*Mean ± SD (Range) in experimental group = 26.7 ± 3.65 (20-35) years


*Mean ± SD (Range) in control group = 26.4 ± 3.90 (19 – 37) years

Period of gestation (POG), Parity of the were having gestation of 36+1 to 38 weeks
subjects and in control groups 37.5% were between
Table 2 depicts that more than half of 34+1 to 36 and 36+1 to 38 weeks. Both the
the subjects (60%) in experiment and half of groups were found to be homogenous in
control group were primiparous. In relation terms of parity and period of gestation as per
to period of gestation 45% in experiment chi square test (p > 0.05).

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 37


Table 2 : Period of gestation (POG) and parity of subjects
N=80
2
Variables Experiment group Control group X
(n1=40) (n2=40) df
f (%) f (%) p value
Parity .80
Primiparous 24 ( 60.0) 20 ( 50.0) 1
Multiparous 16 ( 40.0 ) 20 ( 50.0) 0.36
Period of gestation (weeks)
32 – 34 3 (7.5) 7 (17.5) 2.0
+1
34 – 36 15 (37.5) 15 (37.5) 2
>36+1 22 (55.0) 18 (45) 0.368

Mean ambulation time of subjects after caesarean section


Figure 1 reveals that mean ambulation time after caesarean section in experimental group
was 6.00 ± 0.00 hours where as in control group it was 13.35 ± 2.38hours.

15 13.35 hours
Mean Ambulation
Time (hours)

10 6 hours

0
Experiment Group Control Group

Figure 1: Mean ambulation time of subjects after caesarean section


Pain score before and after early ± 1.94 to 6.00 ± 1.31. But the reduction was
ambulation after Caesarean Section more evident in experiment group which was
among post-caesarean mothers in both further indicated by independent t test which
groups. shows that difference in pain score in both
Table 3 shows that in both the groups groups was not significant before
the post operative pain significantly reduced ambulation but significant difference was
after ambulation. This was indicated as per observed after ambulation. Experimental
Pair t test that in experimental group it was group has significant less pain as compare to
reduced from 6.5 ± 1.82 to 5.30 ± 1.34 where control group.
as in control group it was reduced from 7.25
Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 38
Table 3: Mean post-operativePain score before and after ambulation among post-
caesarean mothers in both groups
N=80
Pain Scores Experiment group Control group Independent
(Numerical Pain (n1=40) (n2=40) t-test t-value
Rating Scale) Mean ± SD (Range) Mean ± SD (Range) df, p value
-1.778
Before Ambulation 6.5 ± 1.825 7.25 ± 1.944 78
(5-9) (6-9) 0.07
-2.106
After Ambulating 5.30 ± 1.34 6.00 ± 1.31 78
(4-6) (5-7) 0.038
Paired t test 3.47 4.01
t-value, 39 39
df 0.001 <0.001
p value
Baseline data of the mothers in first 6 hours control group had urine output >450 ml in
after Caesarean Section first 6 hours. None of the subjects from
Table 4 demonstrates the baseline data experiment and control group moved out of
of the post caesarean mothers in first 6 hours the bed and none of than passed flatus.
after caesarean section. All the subjects in 32.5% subjects in experimental and 10% in
experiment group and control group had control group initiated of breast feed after
normal vitals sign. Nearly half of the subjects caesarean section.
(47.5%) in experimental and 67.5% in
Table 4: Baseline data of the mothers in first 6 hours after Caesarean Section
Variable Experimental Control
N1=40 n2=40
f (%) f(%)
Vital
Normal 40 (100) 40 (100)
Total Urine Output
150-300 ml 7 (17.5) 7 (17.5)
301-450 ml 14 (35.0) 6 (15.0)
> 450 ml 19 (47.5) 27 (67.5)
Moved out of bed Nil Nil
Passed flatus Nil Nil
Initiation of breastfeeding 13 (32.5) 4 (10)
after caesarean section
Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 39
Post-operative recovery after ambulation of catheter while only 20% in control group.
among post-caesarean mothers in both In experiment group 57.5%subjects initiated
groups breast feeding at 6 hours whereas in control
The data in Table 5 reveals that the group it was only 15%. 80% subjects in
higher percentage of subjects in control experimental group had given breastfeeding
group (70%) required more number of and hold the baby independently at 6 hourly
analgesics i.e. 2-3 injection than experiment and started oral intake after one hour of
group (27.5%). Duration of catheterization ambulation and 62.5% passed first flatus
was same in both experiment group (45%) within one hour of ambulation as compare to
and control group (37.5%) in 19-24 hours. control group it was 10% only. These
Nearly half of subjects (45%) in experiment differences were statistically significant as
group self-voided within 1 hour after removal per Chi-square test (p<0.05).

Table 5 : Post-operative recovery among post-caesarean mothers in both groups


Variables Experiment group Control group X2
(n1=40) (n2=40) df
f (%) f (%) p value
Number of analgesic required after ambulation 14.45
nil-1 injection 29 ( 72.5) 12 (30) 1
2-3 injection 11 ( 27.5) 28 (70) <0.001
Duration of catheterization after caesarean section
6-12 hours 4 (10.0) 6 (15) 3.17
13-18 hours 15 (37.5) 16 (40) 3
19-24 hours 18 (45.0) 15 (37.5) 0.36
25 – 30 hours 3 (7.5) 3 (7.5)
Self-void after removal of catheter
<1 hour 18 (45) 8 (20) 10.24
1-2 hour 18 (45) 17 (42.5) 2
>2 hour 4 (10) 15 (37.5) 0.006
Initiation of breast-feedafter caesarean section *N1= 27 *N2 = 36 3.53
At 6 hour 23(57.5) 6(15) 1
>6 hour 4 (10) 30 (75) <0.001
Breast feeding and Holding baby
independently after caesarean section 18.33
At 6 hour 32 (80) 13 (32.5) 1
>6 hour 8 (20) 27 (67.5) <0.001
Start of oral intake after ambulation 31.27
Within 1 hour 32 (80) 7 (17.5) 1
After 1 hour 8 (20) 33 (82.5) <0.001
First flatus passed after ambulation 23.85
Within 1 hour 25 (62.5) 4(10) 1
After 1 hour 15 (37.5) 36(90) <0.001
*Subjects excluded who breast feed in first 6 hours of caesarean section
Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 40
Impact of early ambulation on post- experimental and control group. The
operative recovery among post-caesarean difference in duration of post-operative
mothers shows the comparison of variables recovery variables among experiment and
assessing the post-operative recovery control groups was statistically significant as
among post-caesarean mothers between per Independent t-test(p <0.05).
Table 6: Impact of early ambulation on post-operative recovery
among post-caesarean mothers
Variables Experimental group Control group t-value
(N1= 40) (N2= 40) df
Mean Duration in Mean Duration in p value
hours ± SD hours ± SD
Duration of catheterization 1.34
after caesarean section 19.37 ± 4.60 19.85 ± 5.47 78
0.18
Self-voided after -3.47
catheter removal 1.65 ± 0.66 2.25 ± 0.86 78
<0.001
Start of oral intake after -6.13
caesarean section 6.20 ± 0.83 8.92 ± 2.65 78
<0.001
Breastfeed and Holding -14.76
the baby independently 6.42 ± 1.69 13.27 ± 2.39 78
<0.001
First Flatus passed after -7.72
caesarean section 6.77 ± 1.09 12.02 ± 4.46 78
<0.001
Discussion helping the patient to re-establish the normal
Caesarean section is a method of physiology and preventing or minimizing
delivering baby through an incision made in post-operative complications after the
the mother's lower abdomen wall and uterus caesarean section. Ambulation hastens
instead of delivering through vagina. Post muscle redevelopment and wound
caesarean mothers require special care and it healing.Post caesarean mother should be
is quiet challenging to make this special care encouraged to get up and try to go to the
available to them. A little care given to post- bathroom after the effect of regional
11
operative phase will confirm the post- anaesthesia gone off.
operative period to be healthy and safe. Studies have shown that ambulation at
Early ambulation is a key factor in 4-6 hours after caesarean section is

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 41


recommended in some hospitals. In present suture pain score of caesarean section
study the subjects in experiment group were mothers in control group was higher than
ambulated at 6 hours of caesarean section by experimental group which indicated that
means of walking a distance of 40 meters early ambulation has a positive effect on
13
where as subjects in control group reduction of post-operative pain.
ambulated at 13-14 hours after caesarean In relation to comparison of post-
section which was normal practiced in the operative recovery after ambulation among
labour room. post-caesarean mothers between both
A number of studies on caesareans groups depicts that higher percentage
have reported increased risk of maternal subjects in experiment group self-voided
morbidities such as; hysterectomy, within 1 hour after removal of catheter as
haemorrhage, infection, thrombosis and compare to control group. This result was in
postpartum depression. UK obstetric accordance with a prospective randomized
anaesthesia guidelines suggest that the post- study which revealed that early removal of
operative care of a caesarean patient should urinary catheter after a caesarean section
be in accordance with the care of any post- offers more advantages to the patient in
operative patient as laid out in guidelines for terms of first-void discomfort, time of first
12
post anaesthetic recovery. Early catheter spontaneous void and time of ambulation.
removal, early onset of peristalsis Ambulation time in 4-hour catheterized
movement, early feeding after caesarean group was 13.15 hours and 25.46 in the 24-
section and other supportive treatment such hour catheterized group which was
14
as ambulation and privacy can enhance the statistically significant
likelihood of post-operative recovery. Present study also showed that
Hence in present study the post maximum subjects in experimental group
operative recovery was considered in terms started oral intake at much earlier time as
of the intensity of post-operative pain compare to control group. The finding was
perceived by post caesarean mother, use of supported by randomized controlled trail by
analgesics after ambulation, duration of Adupa D et al in which he compared the early
catheterization, self void after removal of feeding group v/s routine feeding group in
catheter, passage of first flatus, initiation of post caesarean mothers. The findings
oral intake and breast-feeding and holding significantly indicated that women in the
baby independently. early feeding group got out of mobilization
The findings of the present study earlier, had more rapid return of their bowel
revealed that mean post-operative pain score function (p = 0.001) than the control group15.
after ambulation was reduced significantly in The finding of the present study depict
experiment group as compared to mean pain that maximum subjects in experiment
score in control group. These findings were group initiated breast feeding at 6 hours as
accordance to the study conducted by compare to control group. This finding was
Chaudhary S which concluded that the mean similar to that of study done by Harper J on

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 42


Keeping mothers and newborns together caesarean section plays an important and
after caesarean section and early ambulating beneficial role in improving the post
has got several benefits, including the caesarean bio physiological health
promotion of maternal-infant bonding and parameters of postnatal mothers. Thus it is
breastfeeding, which are essential effective strategy which can help in early post
components of care. Results have shown caesarean recovery of the postnatal mothers.
that women who delivered by caesarean It can also be practiced safely in hospital
recovered with their infants at faster rate if setting for the benefit of patients and health
16 11
they are early ambulated. care team members.
The finding of the present study also Hence the null hypothesis (H0) was
showed that there was significant difference rejected and it showed that there was
between the post-operative recovery among significant impact of early ambulation on
experimental and control group. The finding post-operative recovery among post-
of the present study were in accordance to caesarean mothers.
the study of Dube J V et.al on effect of Based on the present study findings it
planned early ambulation on Selected was concluded that early ambulation was
Postnatal Activities of Post caesarean effective in post-operative recovery after
Patients concluded that there was significant caesarean section. Early ambulation i.e. 6
difference in the activities carried out by the hours can be initiated after caesarean section
study subjects of experimental and control for speedy post-operative recovery and to
group, as evidenced by better activities of prevent post-operative complications. Hence
experimental group. This indicated the it s recommended that early ambulation can
beneficial effect of planned early ambulation be incorporated into nursing practice in
on resumption of activities of post caesarean labour room as it can enhance the post-
patients.17 operative recovery and reduce the post-
Result of another study on operative complications. Study could
effectiveness of early ambulation on post- generate protocol for early ambulation after
operative recovery and activities of daily caesarean section which can help the staff
living (ADL) on patients undergone nurses to enhance their competences in
abdominal surgery showed that, managing the post-caesarean mothers.
experimental group experienced a significant
decrease in morbidity as well as significant
References
improvement in ADL as compared to control
group. 18 1. World health organization (WHO)
Making pregnancy safer :A health sector
Another study on effect of Planned Early strategy for reducing maternal and perinatal
Recommended Ambulation Technique on morbidity and mortality available at
Selected Post caesarean Bio physiological apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf-files/EB107/ee26.
Health Parameters concluded that planned pdf accessed on 18.8.2014.
early ambulation after lower segment

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 43


2. D u t t a D C . Te x t b o o k o f 12. Lewsi G, Drife J. Why Mothers Die
Obstetrics.6thedition.Calcutta:NewCentral 1997–1999. The Fifth Report of the Confidential
Book Publications; 2004 :134 Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United
Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
3. Donald M. The role of emotional factors
in obstetric complication. Psychosom Med.30 13. Chaudhar y S. Effactiveness of
(1968):222-234 structured teaching programme about the
knowledge of mothers on early ambulation and
4. Polden M, MandIe J. Obstetrics its impact on the recovery after caesarean
Physiotherapy in and gynecology. Butter worth- section. Sinhgad-e-Journal of Nursing: 2011-
Heinemann,Landon; 1990. 2012; May-Jun; 1 (1)
5. Wilson P D. Obstetric practice and 14. Page G, Gordon D, Wolmon I, Jaffa A,
prevention of urinary incontinence. British Kupfermic MJ, Lessing JB. Persistent
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; postpartum urinary retention in contemporary
103: 154 - 61. obstetric practice. Definition ,prevalence and
6. Finger C. Caesarean section rates clinical implications.JRedprod
skyrocket in Brazil. Many women are opting for Med.2001;46;44-8
Caesareans in the belief that it is a practical 15. Hofmeyr GJ ,Adupa D Early compared
solution. Lancet 2003; 362- 628. with delayed oral fluids and food after
7. WHO. Consensus Conference on caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst
Appropriate Technology for Birth. Lancet 1985; Rev. 2003;(2) :256-59
(2) 436-37. 16. Elliott-Carter N, Harper J.Keeping
8. Dawn CS. textbook of Obstetrics, mothers and newborns together after cesarean:
Neonatology and Reproductive and Child how one hospital made the change.Nurse
Health Education .16th edition. Dawn women health b 2012 Aug-Sep;16(4):290-5.
publishers.2004. 17. Dube JV, Kshirsagar NV, Durgawale PM.
9. Mousavi SA, Mortazavi F, Khosrav A. Effect of Planned Early Ambulation on Selected
Quality of Life after Caesarean and Vaginal Postnatal Activities of Post caesarean Patients
Delivery. Oman Med J .July 2013 28;(4):245-51 International Journal of Health Sciences &
Research December 2013; 3(12) ):110-18
10. Berghella V .Postoperative care of
women who have undergone Caesarean 18. Lin P, Wang R. 2005.Effectiveness of
delivery and discuss potential sequelae of this Early Ambulation on Postoperative Recovery
procedure. Singapore medical journal May and Activity of Daily Living. Journal of
2008; 48:152-57. Advanced Nursing. 51 (3):252-255.

11. Kshirsagar NS. Effect of Planned Early


Recommended Ambulation Technique on
Selected Post caesarean Bio physiological
Health Parameters.JKIMSU Jan-June 2014
3(1)

Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, Vol-11, No. 1, January 2015 44

You might also like