Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Importance of Macro Etch Testing of Welds
Importance of Macro Etch Testing of Welds
Welds
Comment1Share
Tweet
Share
Pin It
0
printemail
M acro etch tests are commonly done as part of
This part was being overwelded by 300%! This meant that if they stuck to
the size called for by the print they would reduce welding time by 75%.
When asked why they were not putting down 1/8-inch fillet welds they
mentioned being afraid of not getting fusion with such a small weld. For the
past 3 years they had been overwelding because they weren’t sure if that
very small 1/8-inch fillet weld could fuse to the root. A simple macro etch
test could verify that. Since they were using a robot, it would be expected
that if they get the penetration they need once, they will always get it due to
the repeatability of the robot.
We took one of their parts and cut it open and this is what we saw…
The green line shows the effective throat of the fillet weld.
As you can see they were getting not just fusion but very deep penetration.
The image shows the effective throat (green line) having a dimension of
0.209 inches. The engineering drawing required a 1/8-inch fillet weld with
fusion to the root, meaning that the necessary throat only had to be 0.088
inches. The current weld is providing more than double the throat which
means more than double the load carrying capacity. So this is not bad.
Except for using four times the amount of weld metal necessary and taking
four times as long to weld.
Much to the surprise of our customer this weld achieved a significant amount
of root penetration. The penetration was so deep that the dimension of the
throat ended up being 0.246 inches. The weld size was not quite 1/8-inch; it
was roughly 3/16-inch. Still, this would represent a 25% reduction of weld
metal. The wonderful thing was that no strength was lost. This weld, due to
a larger effective throat, had 18% higher load carrying capacity than the
bigger ¼-inch fillet weld.
This simple macro etch test provided the fabricator with proof that a better
welding procedure could provide a smaller weld and higher strength. The
procedure was later implemented. The new welding procedure specification
(WPS) was written as an AWS D1.1 prequalified welding procedure based on
the instructions in Qualification of Welding Procedures, Welders and Welding
Operators. However, due to the sensitive nature of this joint a full procedure
qualification test was conducted according Clause 4 of AWS D1.1.
The end result was a savings of 25% in filler metal, gases and welding time
and an increase in strength. The reduction of approximately 25% in welding
time resulted in a total cycle time reduction of 9%. This added capacity was
worth tens of thousands of dollars per year to this fabricator. All of this
facilitated by a simple macro etch test.
If you are looking to do macro etch testing of your welds all you need is the
following:
Band saw (or any way to cut a cross section of the weld – cutoff wheel,
oxyfuel, plasma, etc.)
Grinder