Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Difference Between Rework & Repair As Per IATF 16949?: by - Arun Kumar Sharma

    Uploaded by

    Danang Widoyoko
    93 views19 pages
    This document discusses the differences between rework and repair according to IATF 16949. Rework involves making a nonconforming product fully conform to original specifications, while repair makes a product acceptable for intended use but may require concessions from the original specifications. The document provides examples of each and notes that rework has lower risk than repair. Both require documented processes and approval from the customer in some cases. The definitions from ISO 9000 should be followed in interpreting the IATF standard.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    differencebetweenreworkrepair-190128141336.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document discusses the differences between rework and repair according to IATF 16949. Rework involves making a nonconforming product fully conform to original specifications, while repair makes a product acceptable for intended use but may require concessions from the original specifications. The document provides examples of each and notes that rework has lower risk than repair. Both require documented processes and approval from the customer in some cases. The definitions from ISO 9000 should be followed in interpreting the IATF standard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    93 views19 pages

    Difference Between Rework & Repair As Per IATF 16949?: by - Arun Kumar Sharma

    Uploaded by

    Danang Widoyoko
    This document discusses the differences between rework and repair according to IATF 16949. Rework involves making a nonconforming product fully conform to original specifications, while repair makes a product acceptable for intended use but may require concessions from the original specifications. The document provides examples of each and notes that rework has lower risk than repair. Both require documented processes and approval from the customer in some cases. The definitions from ISO 9000 should be followed in interpreting the IATF standard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 19

    Difference between Rework & Repair as

    per IATF 16949?

    By - Arun Kumar Sharma


    www.submastery.com

    1
    Why this is important?

    www.submastery.com 2
    Non
    Conformity

    Rework Repair Scrap

    8.7.1.4 - Control of reworked product


    8.7.1.5 – Control of repaired product

    www.submastery.com 3
    Which definition to follow?

    www.submastery.com 4
    The ISO 9000 definition should only be applied while
    interpreting IATF standard, any other definitions will just
    add more confusion.

    www.submastery.com 5
    Definition of Rework

    www.submastery.com 6
    Rework

    action on a nonconforming product to make it


    conform to the requirements

    www.submastery.com 7
    Rework Example

    www.submastery.com 8
    NC – Inner Dia mistakenly made undersize (Observed 16.20
    mm against 19.20 mm) because of wrong drill size.

    Action Taken – Drilling operation done again with the right


    drill size.

    Result – Product OK as per original drawing/ standard i.e


    19.20 mm. Thus, Rework

    www.submastery.com 9
    Definition of Repair

    www.submastery.com 10
    Repair

    action on a nonconforming product to make it


    acceptable for the intended use.

    Note - It can be that in conjunction with a repair


    a concession is required.

    www.submastery.com 11
    Repair Example

    www.submastery.com 12
    NC – Nut not properly welded, came out

    Action Taken - Two additional welding joint

    Result - In drawing / standard - only two welding points


    required, but we end-up having four joints. Here, no
    issue in the usage (intended use). Thus, called Repair

    www.submastery.com 13
    NC - Drilling of a hole in the wrong place

    Action Taken - Drilling of hole in the right place while


    plugging the hole in the wrong place.

    Result - Extra plugging hole NOT as per standard /


    drawings. Although, product can be used. Thus, Repair

    www.submastery.com 14
    Let us sum-up differences ..

    www.submastery.com 15
    REWORK REPAIR
    AFTER REWORK - PRODUCT IS 100 % AFTER REPAIR – PRODUCT IS GOOD FOR
    CONFORM TO ORIGINAL SPECIFICATION INTENTENDED USE (FULFILL FUNCTION)

    PRIOR APPROVAL OF REWORK FROM MUST TAKE APPROVAL / DEVIATION


    CUSTOMER NOT COMPULSORY FROM CUSTOMER PRIOR TO START REPAIR
    (EXCEPTION – IF REQUIRED) WORK
    LOWER RISK HIGHER RISK

    www.submastery.com 16
    Are there any Similarities?

    www.submastery.com 17
    - Mandatory documented process

    - Instructions along with re-inspection & traceability requirements

    - Defect phenomena /risk to be identified in FMEA

    - Documented information on disposition including quantity,


    disposition & disposition date

    www.submastery.com 18
    Get FREE Training at https://submastery.com
    Contact Us - https://submastery.com/contact-us/

    www.submastery.com 19

    You might also like