Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Example 1: Defrosting Ice From An Automobile Windshield
Example 1: Defrosting Ice From An Automobile Windshield
VL 80/3.60m/s 0.5m
Re L 8 .875 10 5
1.252 10 5 m 2 / s
1 1
h0L
Nu o 0.037 Re L 871 Pr 3 0.037 8.875 10 871 0.7387 3 1131
0 .8 5 0.8
k
k 0.02288W/m.K
h 0 1131 1131 51.75W/m 2 .K
L 0.5m
From the energy balance the heat transfer through the windshield thickness
can be written as;
T ,o Ts ,o T T , i
s ,o
1 ho t kw 1 hi
For the ice to begin melting, the outer surface temperature of the windshield
(Ts,o ) should be at least 0C. Then the convection heat transfer coefficient for
the warm air blowing over the inner surface of the wind shield must be;
1 1
1 Ts ,o T , i
t
1 0 25C 0.005m
hi 48.6 W/m .K
2
In practical situation the ambient temperature and the convective heat transfer
coefficient outside the automobile vary with weather conditions and the automobile
speed. Therefore, the convection heat transfer coefficient of the warm air necessary
to melt the ice should be varied as well. This is done by adjusting the warm air flow
rate and temperature.
Example 2
Cooling of Plastic Sheets by Forced Air
k 0.02808 W/m · C
Pr 0.7202
1.896 10 - 5 m 2 /s
We expect the temperature of the plastic sheet to drop somewhat as it flows through
the 0.6 - m - long cooling section, but at this point we do not know the magnitude of that
drop. Therefore, we assume the plastic sheet to be isothermal at 95C to get started.
We will repeat the calculations if necessary to account for the temperature drop of the
plastic sheet. Noting that L 1.2 m, the Reynolds number at the end of the air flow across
the plastic sheet is
VL 3 m/s 1.2m
Re L 1.899 10 5
1.896 10 m / s
5 2
which is less than the critical Reynolds number. Thus, we have laminar flow
over the entire sheet, and the Nusselt number is determined from the laminar
flow relations for a flat plate to be
1 1
k
Then,
k 0.02808W/m.C
h Nu 259.3 6.07 W/m 2 .C
L 1.2m
Therefore, the rate of cooling of the plastic sheet by combined convection and
radiation is
Q Q
Q 612W 768 W 1380W
total conv rad
Example 3
Heat Loss from a Steam Pipe in Windy Air
1
hD 0.62 Re Pr 2 3
Re 8
Nu 0.3
1
k
1 0.4 Pr 3
2
4 282000
4
Then,
k 0.02808W/m.C
h Nu 124 34.8 W/m 2 .C
D 0.1m
Then the rate of heat transfer from the pipe per unit of its length
becomes
A s pL DL 0.1m 1m 0.314 m 2
Q conv
hA s Ts T 34.8W/m 2 .C 0.314m 2 110 10 C 1093W
The rate of heat loss from the entire pipe can be obtained by multiplying the
value above by the length of the pipe in m.
Example 4
Cooling of a Steel Ball by Forced Air
1.562 10 5 m 2 / s
0.4 1.849 10
5 14
2 0.44.802 10
4 12
0.064.802 10
4 23
0.7296 5
135
2.76 10
Then the average convection heat transfer coefficient becomes
k 0.02551W/m.C
h Nu 135 13.8 W/m 2 .C
D 0.25m
In order to estimate the time of cooling of the ball from 300C to 200C, we determine
the average rate of heat transfer from Newton’ s law of cooling by using
the average surface temperature. That is,
A s D 2 (0.25 m) 2 0.1963 m 2
hA (T - T ) (13.8 W/m 2 · C)(0.1963 m 2 )(250 - 25)C 610 W
Q ave s s, ave
Next we determine the total heat transferred from the ball, which is simply the
change in the energy of the ball as it cools from 300C to 200C :
1
m V D 3 (8055 kg/m 3 ) (0.25 m) 3 65.9 kg
6
Q total mC p (T2 - T1 ) (65.9 kg)(480 J/kg·C)(300 - 200)C 3,163,000 J
In this calculation, we assumed that the entire ball is at 200°C, which is not
necessarily true. The inner region of the ball will probably be at a higher
temperature than its surface. With this assumption, the time of cooling is
determined to be
Q 3,163,000 J
t 5185 s 1 h 26 min
Q ave 610 J/s
The time of cooling could also be determined more accurately using the
transient temperature charts or relations introduced previously. But the
simplifying assumptions we made above can be justified if all we need is a
ballpark value. It will be naive to expect the time of cooling to be exactly 1 h 26
min, but, using our engineering judgment, it is realistic to expect the time of
cooling to be somewhere between one and two hours.
Example 5
Heating of water in a tube by steam
888kg/m 3
k 0.145W/m.C
901 10 - 6 m 2 /s
Pr 10400
c p 1880J/kg C
Vm D h 2m/s 0.3m
Re L 666
901 10 - 6 m 2 /s
Note that this Nusselt number is considerably higher than the fully
developed value of 3.66. Then,
k 0.145W/m.C
h Nu 37.3 18.0W/m 2 .C
D 0.3m
Also ,
A s pL DL 0.3m (200 m) 188.5 m 2
Therefore, the oil will lose heat at a rate of 67.4 kW as it flows through
the pipe in the icy waters of the lake. Note that ΔTln is identical to the
arithmetic mean temperature in this case, since Δ Ti ≈Δ Te.
64 64
f 0.0961
Re 666
Then the pressure drop in the pipe and the required pumping power
become
We will need a 16.1-kW pump just to overcome the friction in the pipe as
the oil flows in the 200-m-long pipe through the lake. If the pipe is long,
a more optimal design to reduce pump work would be to increase the
pipe diameter D, since pump work is inversely proportional to D5.
Optimal pipe sizing requires an economic life-cycle cost analysis
Example 7
Heating of Water by Resistance Heaters in a Tube
The properties of water at the bulk mean temperature of Tb=(Ti + Te)/2 = (15+
65)/2 = 40°C.
992.1kg/m 3
k 0.631W/m.C
0.658 10 6 m 2 /s
Pr 4.32
c p 4179J/kg C
All of this energy must come from the resistance heater. Therefore, the power
rating of the heater must be 34.6 kW.
The surface temperature Ts of the tube at any location can be determined
from
q s
q s h(Ts - Tm ) Ts Tm
h
where h is the heat transfer coefficient and Tm is the mean temperature of the
fluid at that location. The surface heat flux is constant in this case, and its
value can be determined from
Q 34.6 kW
q s 73.46 kW/m 2
A c 0.471 m 2
To determine the heat transfer coefficient, we first need to find the mean velocity
of water and the Reynolds number :
V 0.010 m 3 /min
Vm 14.15 m/min 0.236 m/s
A c 7.069 10 m -4 2
V D (0.236 m/s)(0.03 m)
Re m 10,760
0.658 10 m /s
-6 2
which is greater than 10,000. Therefore, the flow is turbulent and the entry
length is roughly
L h L t 10D 10 0.03 0.3 m
which is much shorter than the total length of the pipe. Therefore, we can assume
fully developed turbulent flow in the entire pipe and determine the Nusselt
number from
hD
Nu 0.023 Re 0.8 Pr 0.4 0.023(10,760) 0.8 (4.34) 0.4 69.5
k
Then;
k 0.631 W/m · C
h Nu (69.5) 1462 W/m 2 C
D 0.03 m
Discussion
Note that the inner surface temperature of the pipe will be 50°C higher
than the mean water temperature at the pipe exit. This temperature
difference of 50°C between the water and the surface will remain
constant throughout the fully developed flow region.
Example 8
Heat Loss from the Ducts of a Heating System
which is greater than 10,000. Therefore, the flow is turbulent and the entry
length is roughly
L h L t 10D 10 0.2 m 2 m
which is much shorter than the total length of the duct. Therefore, we can
assume fully developed turbulent flow in the entire duct and determine the
Nusselt number from
hD h
Nu 0.023 Re 0.8 Pr 0.3 0.023(35,765) 0.8 (0.7154) 0.3 91.4
k
Then, h k Nu 0.02953W/m.C 91.4 13.5W/m 2 .C
Dh 0.2m
Also ,
A s pL 4aL 4 (0.2 m)(8 m) 6.4 m 2
V
m (1.009 kg/m 3 )(0.15 m 3 /s) 0.151 kg/s
Discussion
The average fluid temperature is (80 + 71.3)/2 = 75.7°C, which is
sufficiently close to 80°C at which we evaluated the properties of air.
Therefore, it is not necessary to re-evaluate the properties at this
temperature and to repeat the calculations.