Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Continental Collisions in Wide Aspect Ratio and High: Rayleigh Number Two-Dimensional Mantle Convection
Continental Collisions in Wide Aspect Ratio and High: Rayleigh Number Two-Dimensional Mantle Convection
Btl, PAGES25,485-25,497,
NOVEMBER t0, 1996
on the basis of numerical models that hot upwellings The model consistsof two layerscoupledby a mutual
rising from deep in the mantle exert stresseson the boundary. The thicker bottom layer is the deformable
continentallithospherecapable of rifting a superconti- mantle which we model as an infinite Prandtl number,
nent. These upwellings originate as a consequenceof constantviscosity,Boussinesqfluid. Overlying this vis-
the changesin mechanicalboundary conditions at the couslayer is a thinner upper layer which comprisesthe
surface which follow a continental collision. rigidly moving plates. With the exceptionof narrow re-
To date, numerical studies of mantle convection in- gions at the plate boundaries, each plate moves rigidly
corporatingfinite thicknesscontinentshave shownthat at a uniform horizontal velocity. Together, the stipu-
at modestRayleighnumbers(,, 105)mantleupwellings lated horizontal and vertical velocitiesalong the base of
situated below continentswill grow in intensity and im- the plates provide mechanical boundary conditions at
part a shearstresson the baseof the continent, causing the top of the viscousmantle.
it to either migrate [Gurnis,1988; Gurnis and Zhong, A number of earlier studiesspecifiedsurfacevelocity
1991]or breakapart [Gurnis,1988;Lowmanand Jarvis, as a boundaryconditionon mantleflow a priori [e.g.,
1993, 1995]. However,these studieshave been lim- Parmentier and Turcotte, 1978; Lux et al., 1979; House-
ited to models having relatively narrow continents and man, 1983; Davies,1988]. However,suchan approach
Rayleigh numbers appropriate to upper mantle convec- may lead to either driving or impeding the mantle cir-
tion. At a Rayleighnumberof 107, pertinentto the culation when the chosenplate velocity is not consistent
wholemantle [e.g., Jarvisand Peltier, 1989],the con- with the buoyancydistribution in the model. A refine-
vective flow dynamics become fundamentally different ment of the prescribed velocity boundary condition is
from the motions associatedwith upper mantle convec- obtainedby adopting a uniform surfacevelocity equal to
tion models. Therefore we cannot assume that results the mean surfacevelocity found in the free-slip bound-
obtained at an upper mantle Rayleigh number can be ary caseof an otherwiseidenticalmodel [Jarvis and
scaled to the whole mantle; numerical calculations at Peltier, 1981]. Althoughthe aforementioned studies
high Rayleigh numbersare required. simulate the constant surfacevelocity observedwithin
In this paper we will consider some of the differ- plate interiors, they do not includethe finite thicknessof
ences which occur in subcontinental mantle flow for the tectonic plates which are characterizedin the Earth by
two casesof upper mantle and whole mantle convec- low strain rates throughoutthe rheologicallithosphere.
tion. The depth of upper mantle convection requires More recent studies have combined a constant veloc-
that our modelsinclude continentswith a much greater ity boundary condition with a viscousplate rheology
width than the depth of the modeled mantle. Conse- to mimic finite thicknessplates. In thesestudies,plate
quently,we considermodelswith aspectratios as large velocity is chosento meet the explicit requirement that
as 24 in a Cartesiangeometrycorresponding to a hor- no net forcebe appliedto the plates[Gableet al., 1991;
izontal dimensionof 16,080 km and study aggregated King et al., 1992]. If it is further assumedthat plate
continents up to 8040 km in width. As in our previ- edgesare weak, this requirement reducesto one of no
ous studies, we impose horizontal reflection symmetry net shear at the base of the plate.
about the midplane of each model so that the numer- Each of thesestudiesadheresto the notion that plate
ical solution domain may be restricted to one half of velocity reflects the distribution of buoyancy within
the horizontal extent of the model. To model the upper the mantle. This philosophy has motivated the time-
mantle,we use Jarvis and Peltier's[1989]estimateof dependentboundaryconditionswe employin this study.
the Rayleigh number of 255,000. For the whole man- At each time step, we obtain two successivesolutions
tle weprescribe a Rayleighnumberof 107. The aspect for the stream function field; the first is a temporary,
ratio of our whole mantle models is limited to 4, corre- or trial, solution, while the secondis the actual solution
spondingto a horizontal dimensionof 11,600 km, and used to march the temperature field forward in time.
the largestmodelsupercontinent consideredis 5800 km We solvefor the trial stream functionfield correspond-
in width. Our purposeis to identify what conditionsare ing to the temperature field below the plates using a
necessary to impart criticalshearstresses on the baseof free-slip boundary condition at the base of the plates.
a large continent. The implicationsof our resultsper- On the basis of this trial solution, each plate in the
tain to the breakup of continentsand the perpetuation two-layer model is assigneda constant velocity. The
of the Wilson cycle. magnitudeof this velocityis obtainedby averagingthe
horizontal velocity at the surfaceof the free-slip calcu-
Model Description lation, over the lateral extent of the regionbetweenthe
plate boundaries. To update the actual stream function
Our mathematical method utilizes a two-dimensional field belowthe plates,we specifythe resultingpiece-wise
streamfunction-vorticityformulation. The finite-differ- constant velocity of the plates as the upper mechanical
encescheme
described
by JarvisandPeltier[1982]with boundary condition on mantle flow.
reflecting sidewall boundary conditions was used to Since our plate velocitiesare determinedsolely from
solvethe resultingequations,with modificationsto al- the buoyancypresent in the viscousmantle, the plate-
low for rigidly movingplates. A detaileddescriptionof driving force associatedwith the plate's own thermal
our model and its mathematical formulation is given by structure (i.e., lithosphericthickening[Hager, 1978;
Lowmanand Jarvis[1995]. Hager and O'Connell,1981])is absentfromthesemod-
LOWMAN AND JARVIS: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINENTAL COLLISION MODELS 25,487
Thedimensionless
vorticity,
•, streamfunction, beneaththe entirecontinent[e.g.,Lowmanand Jarvis,
and velocity,•, are related through the expressions 1993, 1995]. In this study we reducethe influenceof
mirror symmetryby employingwidecontinentsin large
z- v xv aspectratio upper mantle modelsand high Rayleigh
and numbers in our whole mantle models.
Y- V x •b. (4)
The solenoidalvelocity field Y = (u,O,w) there- Results
fore implies • - (0, a•,0), •b - (0,•b,0) and •7 - Previous numerical studies have examined the effects
of continents on mantle convection models which are in-
Having obtainedthe stream function field which is trinsicallysteady[MimouniandRabinowicz, 1988;Gur-
consistentwith the plate-mantle boundary condition, nis, 1988; Lowmanand Jarvis,1993, 1995]. Lowman
weupdatethe temperaturefieldusingthe dimensionless and Jarvis[1993,1995]arguedthat the benefitof this
energy equation approachwas the removal of transient phenomenain
the convectingmantle which could be confusedwith
= + (5) effectsarising from the influenceof continentson the
whereR - (gaATdS/ny)and n is the thermaldiffu- mantle, which they wishedto isolate. Although these
sivity. Equation(5) is solvedthroughoutthe combined studiesprovided a rudimentary understandingof the
two layersof the modelwith boundaryconditionsT - 0 effectsof continentson mantle flow, they failed to in-
at the upper boundaryof the movingplate and T - AT corporatecontinentshavingthe appropriatedimensions
at the lower boundary of the viscouslayer. into a model of mantle convectionemployingan appro-
As with all numericalmodelswe have incorporated priate Rayleigh number.
a number of simplifyingassumptions,suchas constant Beforeanalyzing the resultsof modelswith wide con-
viscosity,uniformchemistry,planar symmetry,and two- tinents and high Rayleighnumbers,we considerthe im-
dimensionalgeometry,in order to render tractable the plications of our modelingapproachon the mantle flow
mathematicsof the problemwe wishedto study. Conse- in general. This will help separateeffectsowingto the
quently,our flow modelscannotsimulatepreciselycon- nature of the deep mantle flow as we have modeled it
vectiveflow in the Earth's mantle. Nevertheless,we ex- from behaviorprecipitated by a continentalcollision.
pect that the essence of the relevantphysicsis captured We specifya dimensionalplate thicknessbetween90
in thesemodels.We considerthe greatestlimitation of and 100 km for all the models presentedherein. The
the model to be its two dimensionality.Although the precisethicknessis a function of grid resolution. In
downwellingsheetsintrinsic to two-dimensionalmod- our models of whole mantle convectionincorporating
els may be a reasonableapproximation of subducted plates up to 5800 km in width, we find that the up-
oceanic plates, upwelling three-dimensionalcylindri- per thermal boundary layer thicknessis comparableto
cal plumesin the mantle[e.g.,Houseman,1988]may the plate thickness.Consequently,thermal instability is
producesubstantiallydifferenteffectsto the upwelling suppressedat the upper boundary. However,modelsof
sheetsof two-dimensional models. (A transitionfrom upper mantle convectionwhichincludeplates with sim-
upwellingsheetsto a systemof plumeshas been shown ilar dimensionalwidths require wide aspect ratio con-
recentlyby Guillouand Jaupart[1995]in laboratory vection cells. The intrinsic limit on heat transport as-
tank models incorporating simulated continents and sociatedwith these wide aspectratio cells (discussed
Rayleighnumbersappropriateto the mantle.) A full below) resultsin upper thermal boundarylayerswith
understandingof the dynamicsof the breakupof super- a thicknessgreater than that of our mechanicalplate.
continentswill eventuallyrequirethe additionaldegrees Nevertheless,these thick boundary layers remain sta-
of freedom associated with three-dimensional numerical ble in our modelsof upper mantle convectionfor plates
models. up to 5360 km in width. When plate widths are in-
An important limitation within the two-dimensional creasedto 8040 km, hot parcelsbreak away from the
framework of our model is the assumptionof mirror head of the upwellingbelow the site of plate accretion
symmetry about the midplane. We make this assump- and are swept along in the large-scaleflow below the
tion both as a numerical expedienceand in order to plate-mantle boundary. The resulting horizontal tem-
isolate the consequences of continental collision while perature gradientsbelow the mechanicalplate gener-
avoiding behavior specificto any particular choiceof ate vorticity and thereby lead to thermal instabilities
asymmetry. One consequenceis that our model su- in the upper boundary layer. Despite these instabili-
percontinent remains stationary, while the mantle flow ties, single-cellflowspersistbeneathour oceanicplates
reorganizesitself in responseto the changeof surface in all cases. We attribute this behavior to the stabiliz-
boundaryconditions.Another is that the upwellingor ing influencesof both the platesand the constantveloc-
downwellingat this plane remainsvertical and cannot ity boundary conditionat the top of the viscouslayer,
drift away from this location. In models with narrow which is also known to be conduciveto larger aspect
continentsand low Rayleighnumbersthe fixed nature ratio cells[Luxet al., 1979;Houseman, 1983].
of the centralupwelling(or downwelling)likely influ- Unlike the top boundary layers in our models, the
encesthe flow pattern, and hence the shear stresses, lowerthermal boundary layersare free to developther-
LOWMAN AND JARVIS: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINENTAL COLLISION MODELS 25,489
0.75
N 0.5
0.25
0 ' I
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Temperature
Figure 1. Dependenceof mean temperature on height in upper mantle convectionmodels. A
heightof zero (i.e., z = 0) corresponds to a depth d -- 670 km in the Earth. The plate-mantle
boundary is indicated by a horizontal line. Each profile is labeled with the dimensionlesswidth
of the plates in the associatedmodel. The profileslabeled 1, 1.5, and 2 are from steady state
solutions,whereasthe profileslabeled4, 8, and 12 wereselectedat randomtimes from nonsteady
solutions.
25,490 LOWMAN AND JARVIS: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINENTAL COLLISION MODELS
from the modelsof Figures 2c, 3a, and 3b. In the latter genceat the symmetry plane has been closedover by
cases,instabilities develop as soon as the lower thermal the continentalcollisionand is marked at the surfaceby
boundary layer is impacted by downwellingsemanat- a continentalsuture. In Figure 4c the cold masssinking
ing from the new subductionzoneson the continental from the new plate boundaryat the continentalmargin
margins. cuts off the large-scalecirculationin the lower thermal
Figure 4 showsa sequenceof isothermcontoursfrom boundary layer. Consequently,motion toward the left
a model with an aspect ratio 24. Continental blocks of the panel ceasesin the lower boundary layer below
each of width 6d have been introduced into the initial the new supercontinent. In Figures 4d-4j the subcon-
flow field. As in Figure 3 we present only the model tinental flow reorganizesitself, culminating in the for-
fieldsto the left of the central plane of symmetry. Con- mation of two dominantsubcontinentalupwellingsnext
tinental margins are marked at the top of the panels to the continentalmarginsand intermittently occurring
and the plate-mantle boundary is indicated by an ar- smaller upwellingswhich are carried toward the larger
row at the right-handsideof eachpanel. In Figure 4a a upwellingsby a longwavelengthsubcontinentalcircula-
continental collision is imminent as the continents ap- tion extendingfrom the midplaneof the supercontinent.
proach the site of plate convergenceat the right-hand At the sametime, the angleof the downwellingemanat-
side of the panel. Until this point the introduction ing from the continentalmargin has changedfrom shal-
of continental lithospherehas not affected the mantle low to steeply dipping. Although the subcontinental
flow. In Figure 4b the continent has collided with its mantle has heated considerablyby the time of Figure 4j,
twin at the symmetry plane at the right of the panel, the integratedeffectof the subcontinentalconvectionis
thus forming a supercontinentwith a width w = 12d. to keep the continent in a state of deviatoric horizontal
New sitesof oceanicplate subductionhave been created compressionat the continental suture. Moreover, the
at the supercontinent 's margins by the introduction of shear stressesexerted on the continent by individual
new mass flux zones. The former site of plate conver- upwellingsare insufficientto induce rifting elsewhere.
In Figures5 and 6 we illustrate the buildup of stresses
on the supercontinentof Figure 4.
Figure 5 showsthe mean deviatoric stress, Txx, at
the continentalsuture for the model of Figure 4, as a
function of time. This stressis the integratedeffect of
the tractions on the baseof the continentfrom margin
to suture zone. Negative values are associatedwith a
net force producing deviatoric horizontal compression
at the continentalsuture zone (i.e., forcesdirectedto
the right in the panelsof Figure4), whilepositivevalues
would indicate deviatoric horizontal tension. Figure 5
showsthat the integrated effect of shear stresson the
base of the supercontinentdiscussedin the description
of Figure 4 is compressiveat all times_at the suture
zone.
8O
Figure 5. Mean deviatoric normal stressat the con-
tinental suture (i.e., r•-j(5 = 6d)) of the modelrun de-
picted in Figure 4, as a function of time. Stressesat
times correspondingto Figures4c and 4j are indicated
4O t I I I
by arrows and are labeled accordingly.Stressesare di-
mensionalizedby multiplying the nondimensionalstress ,,t -.........?.:•L.
LL,.•/,._..._•_•:.;..•:LL,.;
by•R(n/d2), wherer/isthedynamic
viscosity
oftheup-
per mantle,102•Pa.s, and n is the thermaldiffusivity,
1.5x 10-•m2s-• [JarvisandPeltier,1989].
-8O
with the subcontinentallong wavelengthcell described
above which descends below the continental suture and
-120
generatesan extensiveregion of negative rxz.
0 1000 2000 3000 4( }00
The temperature field shown in Figure 4j and the
correspondingstressprofilesof Figure 6b both indicate a Distance(kin)
that the mirror symmetry imposedat the central plane
of the supercontinentis not influencingthe flow or stress
patterns closeto the continentalmargins. Subcontinen- 8O I I I
• oo
50
-100
-150
0 500 1000 1500
Tim•
Figure 8. Mean deviatoric normal stress, rx•, at
the continental suture of the whole mantle convection
model run depicted in Figure 7, as a function of time.
Dimensionalstressin the plates is obtained by multiply- Figure 9. Isotherm contoursfor whole mantle con-
ingthe dimensionless valuesby •lR•/a•, where•/is the vectionmodel B, initially incorporatingtwo continental
dynamic viscosity at the baseof the plates,102•Pa-s, blocks each with a width of d and thickness of 0.034d.
and • - 1.5 x 10-6m2s -1. Deviatoric stressesat times The Rayleighnumberis 107. The panelsproceed se-
correspondingto Figures 7e, 7g, 7n, and 7u are indi- quentially in time downward from the top left. The
cated by arrows and are labeled accordingly. total elapsedtime betweenthe continental collisionand
the isothermsillustratedis (in millionsof years)8.50
continents. (Figure9b); 22.66(Figure9c); 46.56(Figure9d); 74.24
Once a flow reversal occurs below a su-
percontinent(with a former downwellingbecomingan (Figure 9e); 100.87 (Figure 9f); 118.58 (Figure 9g);
upwelling),deviatorictensionoccursthroughoutthe su- 134.39(Figure 9h); 149.99 (Figure 9i); 164.38(Figure
9j); 178.76(Figure9k); 193.15(Figure91);310.41(Fig-
percontinent,reachinga peak at the suture zone. Since
ure 9m), and 318.68 (Figure 9n). Solutionswere ob-
the deviatoric normal stressesexperiencedat the suture tained on numerical meshes of 352 x 176.
zone result from the integrated tractions on the baseof
the continent, more stress is imparted when the conti- models of upper mantle convectiveflow below aggre-
nent is wider (providedthere is only onesubcontinental gated continentswith a width equalto twicethe depth
plume). of the upper mantle since comparable stressesto the
The influenceof the plane of mirror symmetryis ev- whole mantle convectioncasecannot be produced. Fig-
ident in modelsA and B. The upwellingswhich create ure 11 showsone instant in the evolvingflow beneath
deviatoric tension in the continent are drawn together
at the symmetry plane. In model A, they remain there lOO I [ I
Figure 11. Isotherm contoursfrom the left-hand half Summary and Discussion
of four different modelsof upper mantle convectionin-
Continental and oceanicplates were includedin a nu-
corporating supercontinentswith widths, w, equal to
merical model of mantle convection and continental col-
2d,6d,8.6d, and 12d (top to bottom panels, respec-
tively). The Rayleigh number is 255,000 and the as- lision. Continuallychangingmechanicalboundarycon-
pect ratio of the panels is 12. The plate thicknessis ditions at the upper surfaceallow for the simulation of a
0.14d. Solutions were obtained on numerical meshes of closingoceanbasin,in analogywith the periodicclosing
528 x 88. and reopeningof the Atlantic Ocean.
Despite showingan increasein subcontinentaltem-
supercontinents of different widths well after a colli- perature followingthe aggregationof a pair of continen-
sion has occurred. The aspect ratio of each model is tal blocks, our models of upper mantle convectionin-
24; only the left-hand half is shown. In each case a dicate that stressesgeneratedby divergingmantle flow
continenthas collidedwith its twin at the right-hand belowthe aggregatedcontinentsare insufficientto pro-
wall (as in Figure 3). The widths of the modeledsu- ducecontinentalrifting. Thermal blanketing,resulting
percontinentsare 2d, 6d, 8.6d, and 12d from the top to from the presenceof an overlyingcontinent,occursas a
the bottom panels, respectively. In the top panel an consequence of thick continentallithosphereinhibiting
upwellingforms below the aggregatedcontinent'smid- convectivecurrents from reachingthe Earth's surface
plane as in the case of model B, which incorporates [Anderson,1982; Ballard and Pollack, 1987; Gumis,
continents of the same nondimensional width. How- 1988;LowmanandJarvis,1993,1995].However,on the
ever, the stressgeneratedby the upwellingon the base scaleof upper mantle convectionthesemodelssuggest
of this small continent is insufficient to break the conti-
that subcontinentalflow will organizeinto a planform
nental block. This caseillustratesthat althoughsmall characterized by small-scale convectioncells(Figure4),
continental fragmentsmay be subjected to a state of resultingin conflictingstresseson the baseof the con-
mean deviatorictensioneverywherealongtheir length tinent (Figure 6). Consequently, the integratedstress
by small-scale uppermantleconvection,the vigorof the along the base of the supercontinentproducesa mean
flowis insufficientto producestresses of the magnitude deviatoric stress normal to the continental suture well
that are likely to break continents.In the secondpanel
belowthe yield stresswe havespecified(80 MPa) for
the dimensionalwidth (4020km) of the supercontinent continentallithosphere(Figure5).
is comparableto the dimensionalwidth of the super- The models presentedhere indicate that in the case
continentin Figure7 (4176km). However,we conclude of whole mantle convection,the subduction of oceanic
that continental breakup will not occur in this casefor plates at the marginsof a thick continentalplate may
reasons
differentto thosecitedin the discussion
of Fig- be the key event in the triggering of a subsequentcon-
ure 7. Namely, the alternating compressive
and tensile tinental breakup. Unlike modelshaving lower Rayleigh
deviatoric stress associated with subcontinental small numbers, models of whole mantle convection indicate
scalemulticell flow is not conduciveto breakup. For that mantle upwellingsascendingfrom a depth d impart
this reason we also conclude that the continent in the enoughstresson the baseof a continent,as they diverge
third panelof Figure11 will not break,despitehavinga at the continentalbase,to causecontinentalrifting well
comparabledimensional width (5762km) to the whole before overheatingof the subcontinentalmantle takes
mantleconvectionscenariobreakupmodelthat we pre- placedue to thermal blanketing(Figure 9). This dif-
sentedin Figure 9. Finally, in the last panelof Figure fers considerablyfrom the caseof convectionat upper
11 we present isothermsfrom the model of Figure 4. mantle Rayleigh numbersin which the vigor of subcon-
The continentalwidth (8040km) nowencompasses half tinental upwellingsincreasesslowly with time. In the
of the surfaceof the model, but at no point is the 80 latter case,thermal blanketingoccursdue to the inabil-
MPa yieldstressexceeded.Our findingsindicatethat in ity of newly developedupwellingsin the upper mantle
caseswheremultiplesubcontinental convection cellsap- to producestressescapableof breakingup a continent.
pear, eachpair of cellsdrivenby a commonupwelling The resultsof modelsA and B indicatethat at the high
has an integratedstresscloseto zero. An exception Rayleigh numbers associatedwith whole mantle con-
to this pattern is the tension-producing cell associated vection thermal blanketing is unlikely to be the cause
with the subducting oceanic plate at the continental of continentalbreakup. At high Rayleigh numbersthe
margin. This observationwasillustratedin Figure 6b. vigorof subcontinental
upwellings
fluctuates(Figure8)
25,496 LOWMAN AND JARVIS: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINENTAL COLLISION MODELS
and neither the temperature of the subcontinentalman- sentedhere (in which convectivemotion is limited to
tle nor the vigor of the subcontinentalflow appreciates. rolls), but we suggestthat wider convectioncellsassoci-
These findingsindicate that in the caseof whole man- ated with deep whole mantle convectionwould produce
tle convection,it is the shifting of subductionsites to greater continentalstressesthan in the caseof upper
the outer marginsof the supercontinentthat plays the mantle convection as in the casespresentedhere.
dominant role in the breakup of a continent rather than
thermal blanketing. Acknowledgments. Financial support by the Natural
Model A indicates that whole mantle Sciencesand EngineeringResearchCouncil of Canada for
flow reversals
may occurwithout inducingrifting in a continentover- ongoingresearchon mantle convectionat York University is
gratefully acknowledged.We are also thankful for partial
lying a new upwelling. This result implies a critical funding supplied by Lithoprobe, Canada's National Geo-
continentalwidth must be exceededin order to gener- scienceProject. We are grateful to Winston Tao for helpful
ate the stressnecessaryto rift a continent. Our models commentson an early draft of th•s manuscript and Shao-
suggestthat the breakupof a supercontinent into frag- jiang Wang for calculationsto estimate the importance of
ments comparable in width to the depth of the whole lithosphericthickening. We thank C.W. Gable, S.D. King
mantle will occurwhen subductionis initiated at previ- and S. Zhong for helpful reviews.
ously passivecontinentalmargins, due to the preferred
scale of whole mantle convection. This result is consis- References
tent with the mean width of most of the Earth's con-
Anderson,D.L., Hotspots, polar wander, Mesozoicconvec-
tinents at the presenttime. In contrast,if Tyldwere tion and the geoid, Nature, 297, 391-393, 1982.
somewhatlessthan our estimate of 80 MPa, the results Ballard, S., and H.N. Pollack,Diversionof heat by Archean
presentedhere suggestthat the scaleof upper mantle cratons:A model for southernAfrica, Earth Planet. Sci.
convectioncouldlead to continentalfragmentswith di- Left., 85, 253-264, 1987.
mensionscomparable to smaller continental blockslike Brace, W.F., and D.L. Kohlstedt, Limits on lithospheric
Madagascarbreakingaway from larger continents.On stressimposedby laboratory experiments, J. Geophys.
Res., 85, 6248-6252, 1980.
the basisof the closetemporal and spatial coincidence Busse,F.H., A modelof time-periodicflow, Geophys.J. R.
of rifting with basaltprovinces,Storey[1995]hassug- Astron. Soc., 52, 1-12, 1978.
gestedthat mantle plumesmay have playedan impor- Davies, G.F., Role of the lithospherein mantle convection,
tant role in the separationof Madagascarand the Sey- J. Geophys.Res., 93, 10,451-10,466,1988.
chellesfrom India. Furthermore,althoughwe conclude Gable, C.W., R.J. O'Connell, and B.J. Travis, Convection
upper mantle convection cannot exert deviatoric ten- in three dimensionswith surfaceplates: generationof
toroidal flow, J. Geophys.Res., 96, 8391-8405, 1991.
sile stressesas large as 80 MPa, we do find the grad- Goodwin,A.M., RootedPrecambrianring shields:Growth
ual changefrom shallowto steeplydippingsubduction, alignment, and oscillation, Am. J. Sci, 285, 481-531,
notedby Storey[1995],whichincreases
subduction
pull 1985.
at continentalmargins. Guillou, L., and C. Jaupart, On the effectsof continentson
We have appliedour model to investigatingsubcon- mantle convection,J. Geophys.Res., 100, 24,217-24,238,
1995.
tinental mantle dynamics which may result once sub-
Gurnis,M., Large-scale
mantleconvectionand the aggrega-
duction is initiated normal to a continentalmargin. tion and dispersalof supercontinents,Nature, 332, 695-
The continentsin thesemodelsare homogeneous rigid 699, 1988.
blocks and do not contain the variable thickness and Gurnis, M., and S. Zhong,Generationof long wavelength
preexistingweaknessesof real continents. The effects heterogeneityin the mantle by the dynamic interaction
of suchcomplexitiesmight includea preferredlocation between plates and convection, Geophys. Res. Left., 18,
for rifting or a lowering of the effective yield stress, 581-584, 1991.
which is necessarilyan idealizedparameter given the Hager, B.H., Oceanicplate motions driven by lithospheric
thickening and subducted slabs, Nature, œ76, 156-159,
simplified continentsin this study. These issuescould 1978.
form the basis of future research. In all of the mod-
Hager, B.H., and R.J. O'Connell,A simpleglobalmodelof
els presented here, the initiation of subduction at the plate dynamicsand mantle convection,J. Geophys.Res.,
continental margins, which follows a continental colli- 86, 4843-4867, 1981.
sion, is a model assumption. The restriction to two- Hoffman, P.F., Speculationson Laurentia's first gigayear
dimensionslimits the choiceof the new plate bound- (2.0 to 1.0 Ga), Geology,17, 135-138, 1989.
Houseman, G., Large aspect ratio convectioncells in the
ary to a casein which the recirculatingoceanicplate upper mantle, Geophys.J. R. Astron. Soc., 75, 309-334,
is forced to subduct normal to strike. This differs from 1983.
convectionin three-dimensionswherecontinuedspread- Houseman,G., The dependenceof convectionplanform on
ing of the oceanic lithosphere may result in the de- mode of heating, Nature, 332, 346-349, 1988.
velopment of a complex plate boundary characterized Jarvis,G.T., and W.R. Peltier, Effectsof lithosphericrigid-
by subductionalongan obliqueplate boundaryand/or ity on ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow, Geophys.
transform faults. The effectsof sucha plate boundary Res. Left., 8, 857-860, 1981.
Jarvis, G.T., and W.R. Peltier, Mantle convection as a
could producean equally complexsubcontinentalcon- boundarylayerphenomenon,Geophys.J.R. Astron. Soc.,
vective planform. We cannot be sure how the stress 68, 389-427, 1982.
patterns producedby the resulting convectivemotions Jarvis, G.T., and W.R. Peltier, Convection models and
would compare with the two-dimensionalstudies pre- geophysicalobservations,in Mantle Convection, edited
LOWMAN AND JARVIS: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CONTINENTAL COLLISION MODELS 25,497
by W.R. Peltier, pp. 479-593, Gordon and BreachSci., stability related to mantle convection, Geophys. Res.
Newark, N.J., 1989. Left., 15, 68-71, 1988.
King, $.D. and B.H. Hager, The relationshipbetweenplate Parmentier, E.M., and D.L. Turcotte, Two dimensional
velocityand trench viscosityin NewtonJanand power-law mantle flow beneath a rigid accretinglithosphere,Phys.
subduction calculations, Geophys. Res. Left., 17, 2409- Earth Planet. Inter., 17, 281-289, 1978.
2412, 1990. Richter, F.M., Dynamical models for sea floor spreading,
King, S.D., C.W. Gable, and S.A. Weinstein,Modelsof Rev. Geophys., 11,223-287, 1973.
convection-driventectonic plates: A comparisonof meth- Storey, B.C., The role of mantle plumes in continental
ods and results, Geophys. J. Int., 109, 481-487, 1992. breakup: Casehistoriesfrom Gondwanaland,Nature, 377,
Kohlstedt, D.L., B. Evans, and S.J. Mackwell, Strength of 301-308, 1995.
the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory ex- Wang, S., and G.T. Jarvis, A numericalstudy on the role
periments, J. Geophys.Res., 100, 17,587-17,602,1995. of perturbationpressurein mantleconvection(abstract),
Lithgow-Bertelloni,C., and M.A. Richards,Cenozoicplate Eos Trans. AGU, 77(17), SpringMeet. Suppl., 270, 1996.
Weinstein, S.A., P.L. Olson, and D.A. Yuen, Time-depend-
driving forces,Geophys.Res. Left., 22, 1317-1320,1995.
Lowman, J.P., and G.T. Jarvis, Mantle convectionflow re- ent large aspectratio thermal convectionin the Earth's
mantle, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., •7, 157-197,
versals due to continental collisions, Geophys. Res. Left., 1989.
20, 2087-2090, 1993.
Wilson, J.T., Did the Atlantic closeand then re-open?,Na-
Lowman, J.P., and G.T. Jarvis, Mantle convectionmodels
ture, 211, 676-681, 1966.
of continental collisionand breakup incorporating finite
Windley, B.F., The Evolving Continents,John Wiley and
thicknessplates, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 88, 53-68, Sons, New York, 1984.
1995.
Lux, R.A., G.F. Davies, and J.H. Thomas, Moving litho- G.T. Jarvis, and J.P. Lowman Centre for Research in
sphericplatesand mantle convection,Geophys.J. R. As- Earth and SpaceScience,York University, 4700 Keele Street,
tron. Soc., 57, 209-228, 1979. North York, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada. (e-mail: low-
McKenzie, D.P., J.M. Roberts, and N.O. Weiss,Convection man@mantle.eats.yorku.ca)
in the Earth's mantle: Towards a numerical simulation,
J. Fluid Mech., 62, 465-538, 1974. (ReceivedNovember27, 1995; revisedJuly 31, 1996;
Mimouni, A., and M. Rabinowicz,The old continentalshield acceptedAugust 19, 1996.)