What Is Logos in The Bible

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

What Is Logos in the Bible?

A Short and Extended Answer

Faithlife Staff | Thu, May 23, 2019 | Articles, Bible Study 0

More than the name of this blog and our Bible study software, logos (which we pronounce LOW-goess . .
. and LAH-gahss) is an important Greek word in biblical and theological studies.

“Logos is arguably the most debated and most discussed word in the Greek New Testament,” writes
Douglas Estes in his entry on this word in the Lexham Bible Dictionary (a free resource from Lexham
Press).

What does logos mean, and why is it significant for Christian theology and biblical studies? This post,
adapted from Estes’ explanation, offers a thorough explanation of the word.

Short answer

Logos (λόγος, logos) is a concept-word in the Bible symbolic of the nature and function of Jesus Christ. It
is also used to refer to the revelation of God in the world.

Introduction to Logos

The Greek word logos simply means “word.” However, along with this most basic definition comes a
host of quasi-technical and technical uses of the word logos in the Bible as well as ancient Greek
literature. Its most famous usage is John 1:1: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
God, and the Word was God.”

The Meaning of Logos in the Bible

The standard rendering of logos in English is “word.” This holds true in English regardless of whether
logos is used in a mundane or technical sense. Over the centuries, and in a variety of languages, other
suggestions have been made—such as the recent idea of rendering logos as “message” in English—but
none have stuck with any permanency.

There are three primary uses for the word logos in the New Testament:

Logos in its standard meaning designates a word, speech, or the act of speaking (Acts 7:22).

Logos in its special meaning refers to the special revelation of God to people (Mark 7:13).
Logos in its unique meaning personifies the revelation of God as Jesus the Messiah (John 1:14).

Since the writers of the New Testament used logos more than 300 times, mostly with the standard
meaning, even this range of meaning is quite large. For example, its standard usage can mean:

An accounting (Matthew 12:36)

A reason (Acts 10:29)

An appearance or aural display (Colossians 2:23)

A preaching (1 Timothy 5:17)

A word (1 Corinthians 1:5)

The wide semantic range of logos lends itself well to theological and philosophical discourse (Phillips,
Prologue, 106).

The Meaning of Logos in the Gospel of John

The leading use of logos in its unique sense occurs in the opening chapter of John’s Gospel. This chapter
introduces the idea that Jesus is the Word: the Word that existed prior to creation, the Word that exists
in connection to God, the Word that is God, and the Word that became human, cohabited with people,
and possessed a glory that can only be described as the glory of God (John 1:1, 14). As the Gospel of
John never uses logos in this unique, technical manner again after the first chapter, and never explicitly
says that the logos is Jesus, many have speculated that the Word-prologue predates the Gospel in the
form of an earlier hymn or liturgy (Schnackenburg, Gospel, 1.224–32; Jeremias, Jesus, 100); however,
there is little evidence for this, and attempts to recreate the hymn are highly speculative (Keener,
Gospel, 333–37). While there are a multitude of theories for why the Gospel writer selected the logos
concept-word, the clear emphasis of the opening of the Gospel and entrance of the Word into the world
is cosmological, reflecting the opening of Genesis 1 (Estes, Temporal Mechanics, 107–13).

The Meaning of Logos in the Remainder of the New Testament


There are two other unique, personified uses of logos in the New Testament, both of which are found in
the Johannine literature.

In 1 John 1:1, Jesus is referred to as the “Word of life”; both “word” and “life” are significant to John, as
this opening to the first letter is related in some way to the opening of the Gospel.

In Revelation 19:13, the returning Messiah is called the “Word of God,” as a reference to His person and
work as both the revealed and the revealer.

All of the remaining uses of logos in the New Testament are mostly standard uses, with a small number
of special uses mixed in (e.g., Acts 4:31, where logos refers to the gospel message).

The Meaning of Logos in the Old Testament (LXX)

The Old Testament (LXX, or Septuagint, the translation of the Old Testament into Greek) use of logos
closely matches both standard and special New Testament uses. As with the New Testament, most uses
of logos in the Old Testament fit within the standard semantic range of “word” as speech, utterance, or
word. The LXX does make regular use of logos to specify the “word of the Lord” (e.g., Isaiah 1:10, where
the LXX translates ‫יהוה־ ָָּדבָר‬, yhwhdavar), relating to the special proclamation of God in the world.
When used this way, logos does not mean the literal words or speech or message of God; instead, it
refers to the “dynamic, active communication” of God’s purpose and plan to His people in light of His
creative activity (Need, “Re-Reading,” 399). The key difference between the Testaments is that there is
no personification of logos in the Old Testament indicative of the Messiah. In Proverbs 8, the Old
Testament personifies Wisdom, leading some to believe this is a precursor to the unique, technical use
of logos occurring in the Johannine sections of the New Testament.

The Historical Background of the Logos Concept

Many theories have been proposed attempting to explain why the Gospel of John introduces Jesus as
the Word.

Old Testament Word

This theory proposes that the logos in John simply referred to the Old Testament word for word (‫ ָָּדבָר‬,
davar) as it related to the revelatory activity of God (the “word of the Lord,” 2 Sam 7:4), and then
personified over time from the “word of God” (revelation) to the “Word of God” (Messiah revealed;
Carson, Gospel). This theory is the closest literary parallel and thought-milieu to the New Testament. As
a result, it has gained a wide range of general acceptance. The lack of evidence showing such a
substantial shift in meaning is this theory’s major weakness.
Old Testament Wisdom

In the centuries before the writing of the New Testament, the Jewish concept of Wisdom, or Sophia
(σοφία, sophia), was personified as a literary motif in several texts (Proverbs, Wisdom of Solomon,
Sirach, Baruch), prompting arguments that “Sophia” is the root idea for Logos (Scott, Sophia). Paul
appears to make a weak allusion to these two ideas also (1 Cor 1:24). This theory may be supported by
the presence of a divine, personified hypostasis for God in Jewish contexts. The concept of Sophia shares
some similarities with “Word.” However, Sophia may simply be a literary motif. Furthermore, it is
unclear why the writer of the Gospel of John wouldn’t have simply used sophia instead of logos.

Jewish-Hellenistic Popular Philosophy

Philo (20 BC–AD 50), a Hellenistic Jew from Alexandria, wrote many books combining Hebrew and Greek
theology and philosophy; he used logos in many different ways to refer to diverse aspects of God and his
activity in the world (Tobin, “Prologue”). This theory is supported by the fact that Philo is a near-
contemporary of John. Furthermore, the use of the language has several striking similarities. However,
this theory has three major weaknesses:

Philo never appears to personify logos in the same way John does (perhaps due to his strict
monotheism).

Philo’s philosophical system is complex and frequently at odds with the Bible’s worldview.

Philo was not influential in his lifetime.

John’s Theology

One theory for the origin of the logos concept in the Gospel of John comes through the evolution of
christological thought apparent in Johannine context: after working through the creation of the letters
and the text of the Fourth Gospel, wherein the focus is repeatedly on the Christ as the revelation of God,
the fourth evangelist may have written the prologue as the fruition and capstone of all of his thoughts
on the person and work of Jesus (Miller, “Johannine”). As this theory takes the thought-process of the
evangelist seriously, it is elegant and plausible. However, it does not actually answer the question
regarding the origin of the concept, as the evangelist must have had some original semantic range for
logos.

Greek Philosophy

For Heraclitus and later Stoic philosophers, logos was a symbol of divine reason; it is possible that John
borrowed this concept from the Hellenistic milieu in which he wrote (Hook, “Spirit,” 227). While few
individuals support this theory today, early church fathers such as Irenaeus and Augustine indirectly
favored it. This theory may be plausible, as Greek philosophy did have a pervasive influence, and was
accepted by many in the early church. However, there is no direct evidence that the writer of the Fourth
Gospel knew or cared about Greek philosophy.

The Torah

In order to place the Gospel of John squarely in Jewish context, this theory proposes that logos is best
understood as the incarnated Torah (Reed, Semitic). The theory is based on some parallels between
“word” and “law” (νόμος, nomos) in the LXX (Psa 119:15); thus, one could translate John 1:1 as Jacobus
Schoneveld did: “In the beginning was the Torah, and the Torah was toward God, and Godlike was the
Torah.” This theory’s major strength is that it encourages a Jewish context for reading John.
Furthermore, some parallels between “word” and “law” are possible. However, as there is very limited
evidence for such a personified reading, this theory has received only limited acceptance.

[…]

No accepted consensus regarding the origin of the logos concept-word exists. This much appears
probable: the writer of the Gospel of John knew Greek, and thus must have encountered, to some
degree, at least a rudimentary Hellenistic philosophical understanding of the use of logos; however,
being first a Jew not a Greek, the author was more concerned about Old Testament thought patterns
and contemporary Jewish language customs. Thus, it seems likely that, in the proclamation of the
Gospel over time, these strains bore christological fruit for the evangelist, culminating in the unique
“Word” concept presented in John 1.

The Reception of the Logos Concept in Early Church History

The logos concept was a foundational idea for theological development from the start of the early
church. Perhaps the earliest Christian document after the New Testament is 1 Clement (ca. AD 95–97),
in which the author inserts logos in its special usage of God’s revelation (1 Clement 13.3). First Clement
may also contain the first existing unique, technical usage of logos as Jesus outside of the New
Testament (if 1 Clement 27.4 is read as an allusion to Colossians 1:16; if not, it is still a very close parallel
to John 1:1 and Genesis 1:1). A similar allusion to the logos as God’s revelation/Bible (New Testament)
occurs in the Letter of Barnabas 6:17 (ca. AD 100) and Polycarp 7.2 (ca. AD 120).

The first and clearest reference to logos as Christ comes in the letters of Ignatius, a bishop of Antioch,
who was martyred ca. AD 110 (To the Magnesians 8.2). By the middle of the second century, the logos
concept began to appear in conventional (Letter to Diognetus 12.9), apologetic (Justin Martyr, Irenaeus)
and theological (Irenaeus) uses. At the start of the third century, Origen’s focus on the logos as to the
nature of Christ signaled the intense interest that Christian theology would put on the word into the
future.

Logos in Culture

The logos concept continues to influence Western culture; it is foundational to Christian belief. The
Greek idea of logos (with variant connotations) was also a major influence in Heraclitus (ca. 540–480
BC), Isocrates (436–338 BC), Aristotle (384–322 BC), and the Stoics, even becoming part of ancient
popular culture (Philo). The concept has continued to influence Western culture since that time, partly
due to the philosophical tradition of the logos that resumed post-Fourth Gospel with Neo-Platonism and
with various strains of Gnosticism. Propelled through the centuries in its comparison/contrast to
Christian theology, the logos continued into modern philosophical discussion with diverse thinkers
including Hegel (1770–1831), Edmund Husserl (1859–1938), Carl Jung (1875–1961), and Jacques Derrida
(1930–2004).

Without the theology of the Gospel of John, it seems unlikely that logos would have remained popular
into late medieval or modern thought. Logos is one of the very few Greek words of the New Testament
to be transliterated into English and put into everyday Christian usage.

You might also like