Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indg 304 Reading Response
Indg 304 Reading Response
Jones, Jocelyn
Reading Response #1
INDG 303
March 9th, 2020
In chapter six of Linda Tuhiwai Smith’s book, Decolonizing Methodologies, the focus
shifts to field research and its developments by Indigenous peoples. This includes how the
Indigenous people's project sets out a new framework within Indigenous research while
explaining relevant social-historical movements, and the Indigenous research agenda (Smith
111). Lastly, Smith discusses how respect and ethical protocols are essential when conducting
Smiths' main thesis explains how using Indigenous field research is problematic from an
Indigenous person’s point of view due to the struggles throughout history. Firstly, Smith explains
the 500 years of interaction with the West. She emphasizes the basic struggle for survival and
how Indigenous peoples have faced from Eurocentric colonization (Smith 111). Smith then
begins to discuss the significance of all the Indigenous social movements and its implications.
Smith, in particular, explains how the movement shifted from for the “people” to the “peoples”
and the importance of that movement (112). It is explained how Smith focuses on the Maori
peoples, such as how their dream is centered around sovereignty, family, language, and Maori
culture (113). Smith explains how Indigenous research is highly political, with Gerald Alfred
stating that if you are born Indian you are born into politics (114). The discussion shifts onto
Jones 2
international mobilization and how different peoples in different countries have engaged in re-
establishing Indigenous communities. It is then exemplified how a simple chart, a metaphor for
the ocean, emphasizes different tides that produce a practice for methodological research from an
Within chapter six, Smith highlights important evidence surrounding her arguments.
Regarding its development, the Indigenous people's project is significant due to its growth post
World War Two, and Smith explains how it was re-formulated and faced struggles such as
violent revolutions, armed resistance, and ‘decolonization of the mind’ (111). The social
movement stems from the problematic view of cultural revitalization, referring to the Eurocentric
domination of Indigenous people’s culture (Smith 112). Among Indigenous writers, there is a
consensus that social movements by Indigenous peoples are due to urbanization, revivalism, and
out of the reserves (Smith 112). According to Smith, Indigenous communities have contested the
legitimacy of documents referring to lands that were built by colonial states. Indigenous
Australians challenge the existing documents of terra nullies because they are constantly being
denied claims to land (Smith 115). One of the central points of this chapter was the chart Smith
provided. The tides are survival, recovery, development, and self-determination at the center
which according to the chart means different research processes (Smith 121). Each tide has deep
meaning and process’s that are required to do Indigenous research. Lastly, Smith explains how
ethical protocols are important within research in Indigenous communities because it should be
centered around respect and reciprocity (125). Smith explains how there are different codes of
conduct and values that must be represented within an Indigenous community (125).
This chapter provides meaning about the importance of historical social movements by
Indigenous peoples. The people’s project agenda is important because it is creating a new
Jones 3
framework within Indigenous research methods. If applied from a Western perspective, it would
Works Cited
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd