Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Family Law
Family Law
Family Law
Hindu Law, Muslim Law and also the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 are three
distinct legal systems which are prevalent. A guardian could also be a natural
guardian, testamentary guardian or a guardian appointed by the court. When
making a decision the question of guardianship, two distinct things need to be
taken into consideration - person of the minor and his property. Often the
identical person isn't entrusted with both.
The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (32 of 1956) has codified laws of
Hindus regarding minority and guardianship. As within the case of unmodified
law, it's upheld the superior right of father. It lays down that a toddler could be
a minor till the age of 18 years. Natural guardian for both boys and unmarried girls
is first the daddy then the mother. Prior right of mother is recognized just for the
custody of kids below five. Just in case of illegitimate children, the
mother incorporates a better claim than the putative father. The act makes no
distinction between the person of the minor and his property and, therefore
guardianship implies control over both. The Act directs that when making a
decision the question of guardianship, courts must take the welfare of kid because
the paramount consideration.
Under the Muslim law, the father enjoys a dominant position. It also makes a
distinction between guardianship and custody. For guardianship, which has usually
reference to guardianship of property, according to Sunnis, the father is preferred
and in his absence his executor.If no executor has been appointed by the father, the
guardianship passes on to the paternal grandfather. Among Shias, the difference is
that the father is regarded as the sole guardian but after his death, it is the right of
the grandfather to take over responsibility and not that of the executor. Both
schools, however, agree that father while alive is the sole guardian. Mother is not
recognized as a natural guardian even after the death of the father.
As regards rights of a natural guardian, there is no doubt that father's right extends
both to property and person. Even when mother has the custody of minor child,
father's general right of supervision and control remains. Father can, however,
appoint mother as a testamentary guardian. Thus, though mother may not be
recognised as natural guardian, there is no objection to her being appointed under
the father's will. Muslim law recognises that mother's right to custody of minor
children (Hizanat) is an absolute right. Even the father cannot deprive her of it.
Misconduct is the only condition which can deprive the mother of this right. As
regards the age at which the right of mother to custody terminates, the Shia school
holds that mother's right to the Hizanat is only during the period of rearing which
ends when the child completes the age of two, whereas Hanafi School extends the
period till the minor son has reached the age of seven. In case of girls, Shia laws
uphold mother's right till the girl reaches the age of seven and Hanafi School till
she attains puberty.
Meaning of Adoption:-
“Adoption” means the process through which the adopted child is permanently
separated from his biological parents and becomes the legitimate child of his
adoptive parents with all the rights, privileges and responsibilities that are
attached to the relationship. Adoption of orphan, abandoned and surrendered
children in India is governed by a set of guidelines notified by Government of
India.
The adoption is not an institution peculiar to Hinduism, but owes its origin to the
Social communism peculiar to the primitive races. In early times, children
irrespective of their sex were taken in adoption. Manu defines an adopted son as
follows – “A son equal in caste and affectionately disposed, whom his mother or
father (or both) give with water at a time of calamity, is known as the Dattrima
(Dattaka) son.
Adoption under Hindu Law:
The Shastric Hindu Law looked at adoption more as a sacramental than secular
act. Some judges think that the object of adoption is twofold:
to secure one's performance of one's funeral rites and 2) to preserve the
continuance of one's lineage[1]. Hindus believed that one who died without
having a son would go to hell called poota and it was only a son who could save
the father from going to Poota. This was one of the reasons to beget a son.
Ancient Hindu Shastras recognized Dattaka and Kritrima as types of sons.
In the Hindu Shastras, it was said that the adopted son should be a reflection of
the natural son. This guaranteed protection and care for the adopted son. He was
not merely adoptive parents, but all relations on the paternal and maternal side in
the adoptive family also came into existence. This means he cannot marry the
daughter of his adoptive parents, whether the daughter was natural-born or
adopted. In the modern adoption laws, the main purpose is considered to be to
provide consolation and relief to a childless person, and on the other hand, rescue
the helpless, the unwanted, the destitute or the orphan child by providing it with
parents. However, in the Chandrashekhara case [2] it was held that the validity of
an adoption has to be judged by spiritual rather than temporal considerations and
devolution of property is only of secondary importance.
However this may not be essential in all cases as to the validity of adoption?
Who May Adopt?
Capacity of male
Any male Hindu, who is of sound mind and is not a minor, has the capacity to take
a son or daughter in adoption. Provided that if he has a wife living, he shall not
adopt except with the consent of his wife, unless his wife has completely and
finally renounced the world or has ceased to be a Hindu, or has been declared by
a court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound mind. If a person has more
than one wife living at the time of adoption the consent of all the wives is
necessary unless the consent of one of them is unnecessary for any of the reasons
specified in the preceding provision.
Capacity of female
b. The father alone if he is alive shall have the right to give in adoption, but
such right shall not be exercised except with the consent of the mother
unless the mother has completely and finally renounced the world or has
ceased to be a Hindu, or has been declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be of unsound mind.
c. The mother may give the child in adoption if the father is dead or has
completely and finally renounced the world or has ceased to be a Hindu, or
has been declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound
mind.
d. Where both the father and mother are dead or have completely and finally
renounced the world or have abandoned the child or have been declared
by a court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound mind or where the
parentage of the child is unknown - the guardian of the child may give the
child in adoption with the previous permission of the court. The court while
granting permission shall be satisfied that the adoption is for the welfare of
the child and due consideration will be given to the wishes of the child
having regard for the age and understanding of the child.
a. he or she is a Hindu;
d. He or she has not completed the age of fifteen years unless there is a
custom or usage applicable to the parties which permits persons who have
completed the age of fifteen years being taken in adoption.
Adoption is the transplantation of a son from the family in which he is born, into
another family by gift made by his natural parents to his adopting parents. Islam
does not recognize adoption. In Mohammed Allahabad Khan v. Mohammad Ismail
it was held that there is nothing in the Mohammedan Law similar to adoption as
recognized in the Hindu System. Acknowledgement of paternity under Muslim
Law is the nearest approach to adoption. The material difference between the
two can be stated that in adoption, the adoptee is the known son of another
person, while one of the essentials of acknowledgement is that the acknowledge
must not be known son of another. However an adoption can take place from an
orphanage by obtaining permission from the court under Guardians and wards
act.
Adoption under Parsis and Christian laws:
The personal laws of these communities also do not recognize adoption and here
too an adoption can take place from an orphanage by obtaining permission from
the court under Guardians and wards act. A Christian has no adoption law.
Since adoption is legal affiliation of a child, it forms the subject matter of personal
law. Christians have no adoption laws and have to approach court under the
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. National Commission on Women has stressed on
the need for a uniform adoption law. Christians can take a child under the said Act
only under foster care. Once a child under foster care becomes major, he is free
to break away all his connections. Besides, such a child does not have legal right
of inheritance.
The general law relating to guardians and wards is contained in the Guardians and
Wards Act, 1890. It clearly lays down that father's right is primary and no other
person can be appointed unless the father is found unfit. This Act also provides
that the court must take into consideration the welfare of the child while
appointing a guardian under the Act.
End notes
1. Inder Singh v. Kartar Singh (AIR 1966 Punj. 258), as cited in Paras
Diwan, Family Law, (Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad, Seventh Edition 2005), p. 307
2. Chandrashekhara Mudaliar v. Kulandaiveluo Mudaliar (AIR 1963 SC 185), as cited in B.M.
Gandhi, Hindu Law? (Eastern Law Book Company, Lucknow, Second Edition 2003), p. 339.