Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adjective Clauses/ Relative Clauses: "Sentences Inside Sentences"
Adjective Clauses/ Relative Clauses: "Sentences Inside Sentences"
Use which for things and who for people. Use that for things and, informally, for people.
Sometimes, you need a comma before which and who. The rule is this: If the information
added by the who or which clause is just additional information (i.e., it's not essential to
identify another word in the sentence), then you should offset the clause with commas.
This page is about the relative pronouns which, who, and that. They are used to link
information (in the form of a phrase or a clause) to another word in the sentence.
Who is used for people. Which is used for things, and that can be used for either. It is quite
unfashionable to use that for people. (The consensus seems to be that using that for people is
still acceptable in speech and informal writing, but you should avoid doing it in formal writing.)
Examples:
(The clause who swam the channel is linked to The man. As The man is a person, the clause
starts with the relative pronoun who. That could also have been used, but it runs the risk of
annoying readers.)
(which keeps breaking down is a clause. It adds information about (i.e., links to) The PC.)
The vicar which was on BBC1 last night used to be our local vicar.
Please accept my resignation. I don't want to belong to any club that will accept me as a
member. (Groucho Marx quote)
(A club is a thing. Therefore, which will accept me as a member would have been okay.
Remember, that can sometimes replace which.)
The biggest issue for native English speakers is understanding when to use a comma before
which and who. Unfortunately, the ruling is not simple. It is covered in the following lessons:
The other one covered in this section is that. All three (which, who, and that are used to link to
another word in the sentence (very often the one directly to the left) to add information about
that word.
This is a nasty subject. When who or which introduces a restrictive phrase or clause (i.e.,
additional information that is required to identify the word it is linked to), then the who or the
which can be replaced by that. If the who or which introduces information that is not essential
to identify the word it is linked to (called the antecedent), then the who or the which will be
offset with commas and it cannot be replaced with that.
There is more on whether commas are required with who or the which and whether they can
be replaced with that in this lesson: