The document outlines the rubric for grading outlines in an AP Literature and Composition course. An exceptional outline will have a clear and focused thesis, be well-organized with headings and subheadings that support the thesis, provide thorough analysis through legitimate sources, and contain virtually no errors. An unsatisfactory outline will have an unclear or unsupported thesis, poor organization, insufficient analysis, missing or inconsistent sources, and multiple errors.
The document outlines the rubric for grading outlines in an AP Literature and Composition course. An exceptional outline will have a clear and focused thesis, be well-organized with headings and subheadings that support the thesis, provide thorough analysis through legitimate sources, and contain virtually no errors. An unsatisfactory outline will have an unclear or unsupported thesis, poor organization, insufficient analysis, missing or inconsistent sources, and multiple errors.
The document outlines the rubric for grading outlines in an AP Literature and Composition course. An exceptional outline will have a clear and focused thesis, be well-organized with headings and subheadings that support the thesis, provide thorough analysis through legitimate sources, and contain virtually no errors. An unsatisfactory outline will have an unclear or unsupported thesis, poor organization, insufficient analysis, missing or inconsistent sources, and multiple errors.
An exceptional outline: A B C D F An unsatisfactory outline: Thesis: well-written, demonstrating strong Thesis is poorly worded, unclear, unfocused, and insight into the topic generally insufficient to control a college-level research paper Organized and well-developed (x2) Incomplete or poorly organized (x2) Organized and well-developed (x2) Incomplete or poorly organized (x2) Formal outline structure is used Formal outline structure is not used Headings and sub-headings clearly support Headings and sub-headings do not clearly support and and relate to the thesis relate to the thesis Supporting details clearly support and Supporting details do not clearly support and relate to relate to their headings and/or sub- their headings and/or sub-headings headings Thoroughly and impressively analyzes the Fails to analyze the work in the light of the literary work in the light of the literary theory theory chosen chosen One primary source and more than three No primary source and/or less than three legitimate legitimate secondary sources are cited secondary sources are cited Works Cited consistently uses MLA Works Cited does not use consistent MLA formatting formatting Contains virtually no errors in grammar, The outline is riddled with errors in grammar, spelling, spelling, or punctuation, and is properly punctuation, and formatting formatted TOTAL