27082018xkwk3azbeia PDF

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
PROPOSED LPG BOTTLING PLANT KHORDHA
Village: Somanathpur
Dist-Khordha, Odisha
M/s INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED
PREPARED BY
M/s. ULTRA-TECH
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTANCY
(Gazzeted By MoEF)
Unit No. 206, 224, 225 Jai Commercial Complex, Eastern Express Highway,
Opp Cadbury Factory, Khopat, Thane (West) – 400 061
Tel: 022 2534 2776, Fax: 022 25429650, Email: sales@ultratech.In
Website: www.ultratech.in
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... E-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................ 1
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................... 2
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................ 6
5.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES.............. 8
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................... 10
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME............................................................. 11
8.0 PROJECT BENEFITS ................................................................................................................ 11
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................... 11
10.0 CONCLUSIONS......................................................................................................................... 12
CHAPTER 1- INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 13
1.1. INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT AND PROJECT PROPONENT .......................................... 13

1.2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE AND LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ............. 15
1.3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................... 19
1.4. APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ............................................................ 20
1.5. STRUCTURE OF EIA REPORT ............................................................................................... 21
1.6. COMPLIANCE TO TOR ........................................................................................................... 22
CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. 32
2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT ......................................................................................................................... 32

2.2 NEED AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................ 32
2.3 LAYOUT .................................................................................................................................... 32
2.4 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT .............................................................................. 34
2.5 PROCESS DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 35
2.6 PROCESS FLOW CHART ........................................................................................................ 37
2.7 INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE FACILITY ............................................................................... 38
2.8 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM ................................................................................................. 39
2.9 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT DETAILS .................................................................................... 41
2.10 POWER REQUIREMENT ......................................................................................................... 44
2.11 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................ 44
2.12 WATER AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT .................................................................. 44
2.13 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM .................................................. 44
2.14 LITIGATION PENDING AGAINST THE PROJECT .............................................................. 45
EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha

CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT .................................................. 47
3.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................. 47

3.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ..................................................................................... 47
3.3. STUDY AREA INCLUDED IN ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................ 51
3.4. METEOROLOGICAL DATA.................................................................................................... 55
3.5. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................ 57
3.6. NOISE ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................................... 61
3.7. WATER ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................ 64
3.8. SOIL QUALITY ......................................................................................................................... 70
3.9. ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................. 73
3.10. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................... 75
CHAPTER 4 - ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION
MEASURES ................................................................................................................................ 91
4.1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 91

4.2. IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 91
4.3. IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................................................................... 95
4.4. IMPACT MATRIX ..................................................................................................................... 98
4.5. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ................ 99
4.6. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 104
CHAPTER 5: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATES ..................................................................... 105
5.1 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY........................................................................................... 105

5.2 ALTERNATIVE SITE ............................................................................................................. 105
CHAPTER :6: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME .......................... 106
6.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 106

6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ........................................................................................... 106
6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CELL ....................................................................... 110
6.4 BUDGETARY ALLOCATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES ......... 111
CHAPTER 7 - ADDITIONAL STUDIES............................................................................... 111
7.1. PUBLIC CONSULTATION..................................................................................................... 112

7.2 QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 112
CHAPTER 8: PROJECT BENEFITS .................................................................................... 163
8.1 PROJECT BENEFITS .................................................................................................................... 163

8.2 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................. 163
8.3 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE........................................................ 164

8.4 EMPLOYMENT POTENTIAL ...................................................................................................... 164
8.5 CSR AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................... 164
8.6 DIRECT REVENUE EARNING TO THE NATIONAL AND STATE EXCHEQUER ............... 165
8.7 OTHER TANGIBLE BENEFITS ................................................................................................... 166
CHAPTER 9: ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS.................................... 167
CHAPTER 10 - ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................... 168
10.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 168

10.2 EMP DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE ................................................................................ 168
10.3. EMP DURING OPERATION PHASE..................................................................................... 170
10.4. RAIN WATER HARVESTING ............................................................................................... 176
10.5. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY........................................................................... 176
CHAPTER 11. DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED ..................................... 178
11.1. CONSULTANTS ENGAGED .................................................................................................... 178

11.2 LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 180
List of Tables
Table E-1: Environmental Setting around Project Site ................................................................... 1
Table E.2 : Salient Features of Proposed Project ............................................................................ 3
Table E.3: Project Capacity ............................................................................................................ 4
Table E.4: Water Balance ............................................................................................................... 5
Table E.5: Details of Fire Tanks ..................................................................................................... 5
Table E-6: Schedule of Fire Pumps ................................................................................................ 6
Table-E-7:Summary of the Meteorological Data Generated At Site .............................................. 6
Table 1.1: Project and Project Proponent Description .................................................................. 14
Table 1.2: Environmental Setting ................................................................................................. 15
Table-2.1: Land Break Up ............................................................................................................ 33
Table 2.2: Salient Features of Proposed facility ........................................................................... 34
Table 2.3: Non-Plant Shed/Building ............................................................................................. 41

Table 2.4: Plant Shed/Building ..................................................................................................... 42
Table 2.5: Brief Description of Facilities ..................................................................................... 42
Table 2.6: Electrical Systems ........................................................................................................ 43
Table 2.7: Proposed fire fighting facilites..................................................................................... 43
Table 2.8: Water Balance Table.................................................................................................... 44
Table 2.9: Non-Hazardous Waste ................................................................................................. 45
Table 2.10: Hazardous waste ........................................................................................................ 45
Table 3.1: Landuse / Landcover Statistics of Area within 10 km Radius..................................... 51
Table 3.2: Meteorological Monitoring At Site ............................................................................. 55
Table 3.3: Meteorological Data Recorded at Site ......................................................................... 55
Table 3.4: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring.............................................. 58
Table 3.5: Ambient Air Monitoring Locations ............................................................................. 58
Table 3.6: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Results .................................................................. 60
Table 3.7: Noise Level Monitoring Stations in the Study Area .................................................... 62
Table 3.8: Ambient Noise Monitoring Results ............................................................................. 63
Table 3.9: Ambient Noise Standards ............................................................................................ 64
Table 3.10: Water Quality Sampling Locations .......................................................................... 65
Table 3.11: Ground Water Characteristics.................................................................................... 67
Table 3.12: Surface Water Characteristics.................................................................................... 69
Table 3.13: Soil Sampling Stations in the Study Area.................................................................. 71
Table 3.14(A): Chemical Characteristics of Soil in the Study Area ............................................. 71
Table 3.14(B):Standard Classification of Soil .............................................................................. 72
Table 3.15: List of Flora Observed In the Study Area .................................................................. 73
Table 3.16: List of Fauna Observed in the Study Area................................................................. 74

Table3.17: List of Villages within 10 Km. Radius Area from Project Site and Demographic
details ............................................................................................................................................ 76
Table-3.18: Name Of The Location: Near Noonmati Bus Stop ................................................... 88
Table-3.19:Traffic Survey of Lean & Peak Hrs............................................................................ 89
Table 3.20.: PCU Factors on Urban Roads .................................................................................. 89
Table 3.21: Level of Service ......................................................................................................... 90
Table 4.1: Impact Matrix .............................................................................................................. 99
Table 4.2: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ......................................................... 100
Table 4.3: Overall Matrix ........................................................................................................... 104
Table-6.1: Environmental Monitoring During Project construction Stage ................................. 106
Table-6.2: Environmental Monitoring During Project Operation Stage .................................... 109
Table 6.3: Cost of Environmental Protection Measures ............................................................. 111
Table 7.1 Storage Facility ........................................................................................................... 113
Table 7.2 Wind Proportion Details ............................................................................................. 120
Table 7.3: PasquiIl‟s Stability Class ........................................................................................... 121
Table 7.4: List of Scenarios & Failure Frequency ...................................................................... 123
Table 7.5: Effects Due To Incident Radiation Intensity ............................................................. 126
Table 7.6: Damage due to overpressure ...................................................................................... 128
Table 7.7: Consequence Results ................................................................................................. 129
Table 7.8: Individual and Societal Risk of each scenarios ......................................................... 136
Table 7.9: Risk Criteria ............................................................................................................... 138
Table 8.1 : CSR activities 2018-2019 ......................................................................................... 165
Table 10.1: Details of greenbelt plantation ................................................................................. 172
Table 11.1: EIA Team................................................................................................................. 178
Table11.2: EIA Coordinator and Functional Area Experts Involved in the EIA........................ 179

List of Figures
Figure-1.1: Location Map ............................................................................................................. 17
Figure 1.2: 10 Km Radius Study Area Map of Proposed IOCL Plant .......................................... 18
Figure-1.3 Google Map of 10 Km Radius .................................................................................... 19
Figure 2.1: Layout Showing Proposed Storage Facilities ............................................................. 34
Figure 2.2: Process Flow Chart ..................................................................................................... 38
Figure 2.3: Typical Mounded Bullet System ................................................................................ 39
Figure 2.4: Site Photograph .......................................................................................................... 46
Figure 3.1: Hydrogeology Map of Khurda District ...................................................................... 48
Figure 3.2: Map Showing Depth to Water Level in Pre-monsoon ............................................... 50
Figure 3.3: Map Showing Depth to Water Level in Post-monsoon.............................................. 50
Figure 3.4: Landuse/Landcover of 10 Km Study Area ................................................................. 51
Figure 3.5: LULC Map ................................................................................................................. 53
Figure 3.6: Drainage Map ............................................................................................................. 54
Figure 3.7:Contour Map................................................................................................................ 54
Figure 3.8: Windrose for period November-2017 to January 2018 .............................................. 56
Figure 3.9 (A): Map Showing Ambient Air Monitoring Locations.............................................. 59
Figure 3.9 ( B ) : Map Showing Water Sampling Location .......................................................... 66
Figure 3.10; Villages within 10 Km. Radius Area from Project Site. .......................................... 75
Figure 3.11: Male-Female Population Distribution Chart ............................................................ 83
Figure 3.12 : Religion distribution of khordha ............................................................................. 83
Figure 3.13: Baba Bukhari Peer majjid......................................................................................... 84
Figure3.14: SC and ST Population Distribution ........................................................................... 84
Figure 3.15: Literates and Illiterate Population ............................................................................ 85
Figure 3.16: Distribution of working population .......................................................................... 86

Figure 3.17: Traffic Study Location ............................................................................................ 88
Figure 7.1: Methodology ............................................................................................................ 114
Figure 7.2: Event Tree Analysis ................................................................................................. 133
Figure 7.3: ALARP ..................................................................................................................... 138
Figure 9.1: Health, Safety and Environmental Policy ................................................................ 174
List of Annexure
ANNEXURE I: Approved Terms of Reference for EIA Study
ANNEXURE II: Land Ownership Documents
ANNEXURE III: Proposed Layout Plan
ANNEXURE IV: Baseline Monitoring Report
ANNEXURE V: Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA)
ANNEXURE VI: HAZOP Study
ANNEXURE VII: MSDS of LPG
ANNEXURE VIII : Minutes of Public Hearing Along With Photographs
ANNEXURE IX: Rainwater Harvesting System

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) is a premier public sector company in the Oil & Gas Sector and
is engaged in the business of refining and retailing of petroleum products including LPG in the
country. It is the leading Indian corporate in the Global Fortune 500 listing, ranked at the 137th
position in the year 2017. IOCL is having about 167 bulk storage terminals and depots, 101 aviation
fuel stations and 91 LPG bottling plants which serve every corner of the country. Indane (the trade
name of LPG of IOCL) is supplied to the consumers through a network of about 10200 distributors.
As per the Govt policy, more people are induced to use clean fuel giving rise to increase in demand
for LPG.
In order to meet the local need in the State of Odisha, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd has decided to
set up an LPG Bulk Storage & Bottling Facility (Indane Bottling Plant) at Plot Nos 701, 703,704,
706, 707(P) & 708 (P), at Somanathpur of Khordha district, Odisha.
As per EIA Notification, published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part-II, Section-3, subsection
(ii) of MoEF&CC dated 14.09.2006 & subsequent amendments, the proposed project falls in Activity
6(b), Category-B of “List of Projects or Activities Requiring Prior Environmental Clearance”. As
per the above notification, proposed project will have to obtain environmental clearance from State
Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) or State Environmental Appraisal Committee
(SEAC).
2.0 PROJECT LOCATION
The details of environmental setting are given below.

Table E-1: Environmental Setting around Project Site
SN Particulars Details
1. Name of Project Proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plant at
Khordha at Somanathpur of Khordha district, Odisha
by M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
2. Project Proponent M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited

3. Plant location Village Somanathpur, Khordha district , Odisha by
M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
4. Coordinates A: 20°13‟23.51”N, 85°57‟19.10”E
B: 20°13‟50.38”N, 85°57‟31.58”E
C: 20°13‟34.13”N, 85°57‟67.04”E
D: 20°13‟06.64”N, 85°57‟50.15”E
5. General elevation above MSL 243 ft
6. Nearest highways NH 5 – 1.3 km (ES)
7. Present land use at the site Barren Land
8. Nearest railway station Khurda Road Railway Station: 18 km(NE)
9. Nearest Airport Biju Patnaik International Airport: 35 km(NE)
EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha E-1
10. Nearest major water bodies Narsingh Nala -9 (N)
11. Nearest town/City Khordha Town-10 (NE)
12. Interstate boundary None within 10 km
13. Archaeologically important None within 10 km
places
14. Protected areas as per Wildlife None within 10 km
Protection Act, 1972 (Tiger
reserve, Elephant reserve,
Biospheres, National parks,
Wildlife sanctuaries,
community reserves and
conservation reserves)
15. Reserved / Protected Forests Jariput Protected Forest-1.5(N)
Barunai Reserved Forest-4.7(NE)
16. Defence Installations None within 10 km
17. Seismicity The proposed project is in Seismic Zone III as per
IS: 1893 and all designs will be as per IS Codes
18. Industries 1. M/s Jagannath Stone Crusher-1km ( E )
2. M/s. Mahima Stone Crusher-0.5km (S)
3. M/S Bajrangi Stone Crusher-1km (SE)
4. M/S Baba sando Stone Crusher-0.75 (SE)
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Indian Oil Corporation Limited has purchased 32 acres of land from Shree Jagannath Temple Trust,
Puri and shall utilize for setting up a new LPG bottling plant. Bottling Capacity of the Bottling Plant
at Khordha is 60 TMTPA through 2 LPG Filling Systems / Carousels. There will be no chemical
process involved and the operation carried out will be: receipt of LPG in bulk form by road tankers,
storing the same in mounded storage vessel (MSV) and filling of LPG into cylinders
(domestic/commercial/industrial) using electronic carousel and associated on-line conveyor systems.
The cylinders filled will be checked for quality and quantity and then dispatched by packed cylinder
truck.
In the Proposed LPG Bottling Plant, the storage of LPG will be in liquid form in mounded bullet
storage. Total storage capacity is 1800 MT distributed in 3 MSV of 600 MT each. The system of
storing mounded storage vessel has been recognized as one of the safest forms of storage for LPG.
Bullets will be submerged in ground and enacsed in four-sided retaining wall having a designed layer
of earth over the bullets.
Table E.2 : Salient Features of Proposed Project
Sr. Description Details

No.
1 Total Land 32 Acres or 129499 SQM
2 Capacity of MSV 3 x 600 MT
3 Power requirement 400 KW
Source: M/s. Central Electricity Supply Utility, Odisha
(CESU)
D.G Sets as Backup - 1x250 kVA and 1x700 kVA
4 Water requirement Total water requirement approx. 15 m3/day including

domestic and fire water
Source: Bore well within the premises.
5 Man power Required Manpower = 80

(Direct and indirect to include contract labors and security
personnel).
6 Project Cost INR 161.59 Crore
7 Fire Fighting Facilities

A Fire water storage 3 X 2500 m3
B Fire water pumps Diesel Driven Pumps of 3 * 700 KL/hr capacity
C Jockey pumps Electric motor driven 2* 20 m3/hr capacity

C Water sprinkler / Deluge At all relevant places (will be converted to auto sprinkler
system system supported by PLC based ILSD)
D Fire Hydrant/monitor As prescribed by OISD
piping network
E DCP & CO2 extinguishers As prescribed by OISD
F Gas Monitoring System As prescribed by OISD
G ILSD As per OISD-144
8 EMP costs Capital cost- Rs. 900 Lacs
Recurring cost – Rs. 15 lacs
 Technology and Acitivity (Process) Description
There is no manufacturing process involved in the LPG Bottling Plant. The operations can be divided
into:
 Receipt of finished LPG products through bullet trucks.

 Storage of LPG products in storage tanks as per OISD norms.
 Packaging of the LPG into cylinders.
 Dispatch of LPG products through Vehicles (Lorries)
The entire operation of RECEIPT, STORAGE, FILLING AND DISPATCH of LPG will be carried
out in a closed system thereby eliminating risk of leakage of products and to achieve enhanced
safety. There is no chance of mixing LPG with atmosphere outside.
Table E.3: Project Capacity
Type of Vessel Nos Capacity Total Capacity
Mounded Bullets 3 600 MT 1800 MT
 Land Requirement
The proposed project will be carried out in the plot nos 701, 703,704, 706, 707(P) & 708 (P), Mouza
Somnathpur; District Khordha, covering a total area of 32 Ac. The plot has been purchased from
Shree Jagannath Temple Trust, Puri. The plot is close to the Industrial Estate, Khurdha.The plot is
well connected by Road and Railway line and having other infrastructural facilities. Hence, no
alternate sites were considered for the project.
 Water Requirement, Source & Wastewater Generation
Total Water Requirement will be approximately 15m3/day, which will be sourced through bore well
within the premises. Water balance table & diagram are given below
Table E.4: Water Balance
Water Consumption Wastewater Generation & Disposal

Sl. Particulars Quantity Quantity Disposal Method
No (m3/day) (m3/day)
1 Domestic water 8 6.5 septic tanks and disposed off
requirement through soak pits
2 Industrial water 5 4 Waste is treated in ETP and
requirement (Cylinder used for gardening of green
washing) belt areas.
3 Gardening 2
Total 15 10.5
 Manpower
Total Manpower Requirement of the project will be 80 (20 direct and 60 indirect to include contract
labour and security personnel).
 Power Requirement & Source
Power required for the proposed operations is 400 KW sourced from M/s. Central Electricity Supply
Utility, Odisha (CESU). Stand by DG Sets are proposed to be installed
 Fire Fighting Facilities
Following Fire Fighting Facilities will be provided.
 Medium velocity Water Sprinkler system shall be provided in product pump house, TLD
decantation Shed, Mounded bullet and all over the filling shed as per prevailing safety guidelines
issued by OISD-144
 Fire fighting system on proposed LPG Mounded Bullets as per prevailing safety guidelines
issued by OISD-150
 Provision of Fire hydrant piping network with intermittent deluge valves covering full licensed
area
 The Fire Water tanks have been provided as shown in Table E.3 and Schedule of Fire Pumps
have been provided in Table E.4.
Table E.5: Details of Fire Tanks
Dimater Height
SN Product Type of Tank Capacity
(m) (m)
1 Fire Tank Vertical Above 3 X 2500 m3 18 11.25
Water ground cone roof
Table E-6: Schedule of Fire Pumps
Head Nos of Pumps

SN Description Capacity
m WC Operating Standby
1 Main Pumps Deisel
3 x 700 m3/hr 85 m 2 1
Engine Driven
2 Jockey Pumps
2 x 20 m3/hr 85 m 1 1
Electrical Driven
 Emergency Trip Buttons & Manual Call Points
These emergency push buttons are provided at strategic places in the plant. In case of emergency,
when the emergency trip button is actuated action takes place as specified in the clause 11.11 of
OISD 144 which involves tripping of electricity to all the operating equipment in the hazardous area
of the plant, closure of all remote operated valves on the LPG pipelines and sounding of siren.
Operation of manual call point will denote a abnormal situation alerting the plant personnel and will
involve the sounding of siren only. These points are provided at strategic locations in the plant.
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
The area around the proposed LPG Bottliong Plant is being surveyed for physical features and
existing environmental scenario. The field survey and baseline monitoring has been done from the
period of November 2017 to January 2018.
 Meteorology
An automatic weather monitoring station was installed for recording hourly Wind speed, Wind
direction, Temperature, Relative humidity and Rainfall measurements during the study period near
proposed project site and the summary of meteorological datagenerated at site is presented in
following Table-E-7.
Table-E-7:Summary of the Meteorological Data Generated At Site
Temperature Relative Humidity, Wind Speed, Predominant

Month (°C) % m/s wind direction
Min Max Min Max Mean
November 2017
10.2 34.2 48 78 0.1 NE
to January 2018
 Air Environment
8 ambient air quality monitoring stations were selected in and around the project site and studies
were carried out as per CPCB standards. Levels of PM10 and PM2.5 are found to exist in the range of
90 to 268 µg/m3 and 39.7 to 166.8 µg/m3respectively. Sulphur dioxide and Oxides of Nitrogen are
observed in the range of 15 to 62 µg/m3 and 33 to 88 µg/m3respectively.
 Noise Environment
The noise monitoring has been conducted for determination of noise levels at 8 locations in the study
area. Day and night noise level at the residential zone is 61 to 63 dB(A) and 48 to 54 dB(A)
respectively, which are well within the limits as per ambient noise standards.
 Water Environment
Ground Water Quality

 The analysis results indicate that the pH ranges in between 6.98 to 7.92, which is well within the
specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5
 Total hardness was observed to be ranging from 67.68 to 325.24 mg/l. The minimum hardness
(67.68 mg/l) was recorded at GW3 and the maximum (325.24 mg/l) was recorded at GW6.
 Chlorides were found to be in the range of 13.1 to 215.25 mg/l, the minimum concentration of
chlorides (13.1 mg/l) was observed at GW2, whereas the maximum value of 215.25 mg/l was
observed at GW6.
 Sulphates were found to be in the range of 1.2 to 45.36 mg/l. The minimum value observed at
GW2 (1.2 mg/l) whereas the maximum value observed at GW6 (45.36 mg/l).
 The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations were found to be ranging in between 176.0 to
680.0 mg/l, the minimum TDS observed at GW3 (176.0 mg/l) and maximum concentration of
TDS observed at GW6 (680.0 mg/l).
 Iron is found in between 0.30 to 6.31 mg/l and Zinc found in between 0.19 to 0.45 mg/l.
Surface Water Quality

 The analysis results indicate that the pH values in the range of 6.98 to 7.51
 DO was observed to be 7.6 mg/l in both samples.
 The TDS was observed in the range of 40.0 to 69.0 mg/l, the minimum TDS value was observed
at SW2, and where as maximum value was observed at SW1.
 The chlorides and Sulphates were found to be in the range of 9.36 to 15.44 mg/l and 2.88 to 3.12
mg/l, respectively.
 Total hardness expressed as CaCO3 ranges between 11.28 to 24.44 mg/l.
 The calcium & magnesium were found to be in the range of 3.01 to 6.03 mg/l and 0.91 to 2.29
mg/l, respectively. zinc is found in between 0.15 to 0.20 mg/l.
 Soil Quality
A total of seven samples within the study area were collected and analysed. It has been observed
that the texture of soil is mostly Sandy Clay in the study area. It has been observed that the pH of
the soil quality ranged from 6.80 to 7.8 indicating that the soil is neutral to slightly alkaline in
nature. The electrical conductivity was observed to be in the range of 16.0 to 120 mmhos/cm.
 Ecology & Biodiversity
There are no endemic and endangered species of flora within the study region. There is no wild life
sanctuary, national park or bird sanctuary with in the 10 km radius of the project site. There are 1
reserve forest (Barunai) & 2 protected forests (Jariput & Tartua) in the 10 km from the study area
 Socio-Economic Environment
Study of socio-economic profile around the proposed project site has been carried out based on
“Census of India 2011. As per the prescribed TOR of the EIA Study for the proposed project, the
study area has been an area covered within a radius of 10 km around the proposed project site
beyond which appreciable positive impact due to the project is envisaged.
The salient features of socioeconomic profile of the Study Area are as follows:
 The population in the study area is 140645
 The Sex Ratio (Female per 1000 Male) is 951.
 Scheduled Tribes (ST) as percentage of total population is 8.7%. Scheduled
Castes (SC) as percentage to the total population are 13.21%.
 Overall literacy rate, according to 2011 Census is 77.72%. The male literacy rate is 55% while
female literacy rate is 45%.
 The percentage of main workers is 33.2% of total population and the Percentage of marginal
workers is 25.9 %. The percentage of non-workers is 66.8%
5.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
 Impact During Construction Phase
Appropriate environmental mitigative measures will be ensured during construction phase to

eliminate/minimize detrimental impacts during this phase. These measures include dust suppression
by arranging mobile water sprinklers; providing accommodations to the construction workers in the
nearby villages by contractor, etc
 Impact During Operation Phase
Main aspects and activities during operation phase of the proposed project having potential for
inducing environmental and/or social impacts are as follows:
• Air Environment
The only point sources of emissions are D.G sets & Fire Engines. D.G sets & Fire Engines will be
fitted with stacks of adequate height to disperse the pollutants. No emissions are generated during
the operations.
Operation of the bottling plant usually does not involve any chemical or manufacturing process,
which may lead to process specific emission of air pollutants into atmosphere. The entire operation
of receipt, storage, filling of LPG in cylinder and its transportation will be carried out under closed
circuit and leak proof system to avoid emission of hydrocarbon vapours into the atmosphere. The
intermittent sources of air emission will be limited to DG Sets and fire Water pumps only. DG sets
awill be operated only in case of power failure during working hours. Further, under normal
condition, the fire water pumps shall operated during mock fire drills only. Hence, installation of
mounded bullets shall not impart adverse impact on existing air environment.
• Water Environment
There will be no industrial effluent generated in this plant. The sanitary wastewater 6.5 m3/day) will
be disposed through septic tanks and soak pit and rest of the waste water will be reused in gardening
of greenbelt areas after treatment. Hence, no waste water shall be discharged outside the plant
boundary.
• Physical Environment
The proposed project will be established on the plot nos no701, 703,704, 706, 707(P) & 708 (P),
Mouza Somnathpur, Dist: Khordha.The plot has been purchased from Shree Jagannath Temple
Trust, Puri.and is a barren land and no habitation exists on the plot and therefore no R&R issue is
involved
 Impact of Solid Wastes
No industrial solid waste will be generated during the bottling process. Damaged cylinders will be
segregated & stored on site prior to disposal as scrap metal. Hazardous waste generated from D.G set
operation will be disposed to OSPCB Authorized Recyclers.
 Noise Environment
A little increase in the noise level during construction and operation has been envisaged. The
duration of construction activities shall be 8 to 12 hours with maximum incremental noise level
equivalent to 10 dB(A) which will correspond to 3 to 4 dB(A) on day and night levels. The
incremental increase in the noise level during operation phase shall be 8 hours (one shift). Hence,
impact on the air due to noise shall be practically insignificant during construction and operation
phase
 Biological Environment
There is no point and non-point source of emission or discharge of pollutants from LPG bottling
plant hence, no adverse impact on the biological environment is envisaged due to the proposed
project activities and operation. More over a considerable area of the plant will be developed as
green belt; the same will provide food and habitat to birds and smaller mammalian species. Thus,
significant positive impact on fauna is foreseen.
 Socio-Economic Environment
The development due to proposed project will have temporary impacts on local socioeconomic
condition of the people residing in the area. The construction of Mounded Bullets would provide
temporary employment, which may consist of locals too. This would improve the socio-economic
condition of the local population. The operation of the proposed project would result in positive
impacts such as industrial and economic development and generation of indirect employment
opportunity.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 Construction Phase
During construction phase, all precautionary measures shall be taken for dust suppression, prevention
of soil erosion and noise reduction. The effect due to construction will be temporary in nature and
will have no permanent effect on the environment.
 Operation Phase
As the bullets will be mounded and the operation will be confined in closed, leak proof system, no
impact is envisaged on the soil during operation phase.
 Air Emissions
There is no continuous source of air pollution from the process of bottling plant. The sources of air
pollution are limited to the DG Sets and the Fire water pumps. These sources of air pollution are
intermittent. During operation, when the DG set will be operated, emissions of SO2 and NOx shall
be within the threshold limit. The stack height of the DG set shall be as per prescribed standard.
 Wastewater Generation
There is no wastewater generation from operation of proposed mounded bullets. The sources of
wastewater generation are as follows: a) Sanitary wastewater from toilets, wash-rooms and canteen.
b) Non-sanitary wastewater from mock drills, Pumps & Compressor House, etc. Sanitary
Wastewater from toilets, canteen and wash rooms are treated in septic tanks and disposed off through
soak pits. Non-sanitary wastewater reused for irrigation of green belt area, lawns & gardens etc.
Hence, no wastewater is discharge outside the battery limit of the bottling plant.
 Afforestation Program
Trees and plants are well known for trapping particulate matters, noise and gaseous pollutants and
also in controlling soil erosion. About 37.5 % of the total area shall be maintained under green belt
development. Evergreen trees having thick foliage shall be planted within the green belt. Only native
species of trees, observed to prosper well in the area, shall be planted. More trees shall be planted on
roadsides around plant & offices in consultation with local forest officials.
 Preventive Maintenance / Planned Inspection
Preventive maintenance and planned inspection of the facilities will be done in accordance with
OISD and as per schedule. Record keeping for jobs done would be maintained. The intermittent
inspection and maintenance schedule would be prepared as per directive and procedures laid down
by OISD. In addition to above management plan, the project will emphasize the following programs
to catalyze the green economy of the nation:
 Solid Waste Management
 Practically, no Solid Waste shall be generated from operation of proposed Mounded Storage Vessel.
 Used oil, grease and empty drums shall be disposed of through registered vendors as per
Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
 Noise Mitigation
Noise is generated from operation of pumps, blowers and DG sets and during vehicular movement.
The mitigation measures have been implemented like acoustic enclosures for DG Sets as per CPCB
guidelines, provision of ear plugs for labour in high noise area, green belts and landscaping have
been developed which act as noise buffer.
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME
It is imperative that the IOCL shall arrange health check up camps to monitor environmental health,
post clearance.
 It helps to verify the predictions on environmental impacts presented in this study.
 It helps to indicate warnings of the development of any alarming environmental situations, and
thus, provides opportunities for adopting appropriate control measures in advance.
8.0 PROJECT BENEFITS
The proposed project is expected to bring significant socio-economic and environmental benefits
both at local and national level. Due to increase in storage capacity, supply position of petroleum
product will improve which will help in growth of economic activity. The physical and social
infrastructure will improve in a significant manner. The project will also create some long term and
short-term direct / indirect employment. Thus, the proposed project shall usher in the social and
economic up-liftment of the persons living near the Project i.e. of society at large.
9.0 RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The maximum tolerable IR is 1.0 x 10-3 per year, whilst an IR of 1.0 x 10-6 per year is regarded as
broadly acceptable. An IR falling between these values is within the ALARP region of risk
Flammable Gas Dispersion: The flammable Vapour cloud Explosion distances (LFL) are more in
case of full bore rupture 200 mm pipeline ruptuew from Bullet Truck. It goes up to approximately
255 m for 2Fwind condition.
Radiation Distances due to BLEVE: In case of Fireball for gas facility, in the event of loss of full
bore rupture 21 MT Bullet , the Fireball radiation distances for 4kW/m2 radiation goes up to approx.
350.6 m for 2F wind condition.
Radiation Distances due to Jet Fire: Jet fire is a credible scenario for gas facility, in the event of
200 mm pipeline ruptuew from Bullet Suction, the jet fire radiation distances for 4kW/m2 radiation
goes up to approx. 275 m for 2F wind condition
10.0 CONCLUSIONS
The proposed green field project will have certain level of marginal impacts on the local
environment. However, it would also generate indirect employment generation, improve the social
and economic environment in the vicinity and meets the fuel need of the state.
CHAPTER 1- INTRODUCTION
1.1. INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT AND PROJECT PROPONENT
M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) is a government of India enterprise with a
Navratna status, and a Global Fortune 500 and Forbes 2000 company. Incorporated as Indian
Oil Corporation Ltd. on 1st September, 1964 Indian Oil and its subsidiaries account for
approximately 48% petroleum products market share, 35% national refining capacity and 71%
downstream sector pipelines capacity in India. It is India‟s flagship national oil company and
downstream petroleum major thus being India‟s largest commercial enterprise.
As the flagship national oil company in the downstream sector, Indian Oil reaches precious
petroleum products, fuels to millions of people every day through a countrywide network of
about 48,000 customer touch-points, surmounting the challenges of tough terrain, climate and
accebility. They are backed for supplies by 125 bulk storage terminals and depots, 107 aviation
fuel stations and 91 Indane (LPG) bottling plants. Indian Oil's vast marketing infrastructure of
petrol/diesel stations, Indane (LPG) distributorships, SERVO lubricants and greases outlets and
large volume consumer pumps are backed by bulk storage terminals and installations, inland
depots, aviation fuel stations, LPG bottling plants and lube blending plants amongst others. The
countrywide marketing operations are coordinated by 16 State Offices and over 100
decentralized administrative offices. The R&D centre of Indian Oil Corporation at Faridabad
has garnered 611 patents, of which 388 are international patents.
IOCL is a premier public sector company in the Oil & Gas Sector and is engaged in the business
of refining and retailing of petroleum products including LPG in the country. It is the leading
Indian corporate in the Fortune 'Global 500' listing, ranked at the 137th position in the year
2017. IOCL is having about 91 LPG bottling plants which serve every corner of the country.
Indane (the trade name of LPG of IOCL) is supplied to the doorsteps of 12.69 crore households
through a network of about 10,200 distributors (51.8% of the industry).The growth in demand
of LPG for domestic purpose is increasing at a rapid pace
M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd has decided to set up a LPG Bulk Storage & Bottling Facility
(Indane Bottling Plant) at Plot No 701,703,704.706, 707(P) & 708 (P) at mouza Somanathpur of
Khordha district, Odisha. The current demand of packed LPG is about 133 TMTPA in the state
of Odisha for the year of 2016-17. The demand is being met by 2 no. of LPG Bottling Plants at,
Balasore and Jharsaguda with a bottling capacity of 90 TMTPA and the balance is met with
hospitality arrangement with other OMCs.
The project demand up to 2018-21 is expected to increase by 356 TMTPA. The increase in
demand is being met by capacity augmentation of existing LPG bottling plants and scouting for
land for grass root projects for LPG BP in the state.
The proposed project is a bottling plant with storage capacity of 1800 MT (3 x 600 MT) and
bottling capacity of 60 TMTPA through 2 LPG Filling Carousels. Estimated project cost is
around Rs 161.59 Crore
EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha 13

The details of the Project and Proponents are as mentioned in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1: Project and Project Proponent Description
Name of Project Proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plant at Khordha,

Odisha
Project Proponent M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Name, contact number and Shree A. Biswas
address of Project DGM (LPG-E)
Proponent Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Odisha State Office
Indian Oil Bhavan
A/2, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751024
Mobile: +91 9437049020
Phone No.:0674-2745875/2745853 Extn 137
Location of the Project Mouza : Somanathpur

Tehsil : Khordha
District : Khordha
State : Odisha,
Geographical Coordinates:
Latitude : 20°07'54.47"N
Longitude : 85°34'28.28"E
Name, contact number and Environmental Consultants :
address of Consultant M/s. Ultra-Tech (Environmental Consultancy &
Laboratory) (An ISO 9001-2008 Company, Accredited by
NABET, Lab: recognised by MOEF&CC, GoI), Unit No.
206, 224, 225, Jai Commercial Complex, Eastern Express
Highway, Opp. Cadbury Factory, Khopat, Thane (W) –
400601, Tel.: 91-22-25342776, 25380198, 25331438.
Fax : 91-22-25429650
Email: timirshah@ultratech.in, debasish@ultratech.in
Website : www.ultratech.in
Size of proposed project Storage Capacity -1800 MT
activity Bottling Capacity- 60 TMTPA
Plant Overview 1. LPG bottling plant

2. Distribute bulk products by road (by tank lorries )
Category of Project i.e. „A‟ Category „B‟

or „B‟
Proposed capacity/ area/
length/ tonnage to be Storage Capacity -1800 MT
handled/ command area/
lease area/ number of wells
to be drilled

1.2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, SIZE AND LOCATION OF THE PROJECT
As per the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification dated 14th September, 2006 as
amended, the proposed project falls under 'Type 6b - Isolated Storage and Handling of
Hazardous Chemicals’ (As per threshold planning quantity indicated in column 3 of schedule 2
and 3 of MSIHC Rules 1989 amended 2000), which requires preparation of an Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) Report.
State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), Odisha vide their Ref. No. 619/20018/32-IND2/08-
2017/121 dated October 06, 2017 forwarded the prescribed TOR of the EIA Study for the
proposed project. A copy of the same is also enclosed in Annexure-I. While preparing the EIA
Report, all the points of the approved TOR are addressed in the EIA Report.
The Bottling plant is located at at Plot No No 701,703,704.706, 707(P) & 708 (P) at
Somanathpur of Khordha district, state of Odisha. The land area of the proposed LPG Plant
facility is approximately 32 Acres and currently is an open vacant land. The site is easily
accessible by road. The project site is 18 km away from Khordha road Railway station on South
Eastern Railway line between Howrah & Chennai. Biju Patnaik International Airport at
Bhubaneswar is located at 35 km. The details of environmental setting are given in Table 1.2.
The location map is shown in Figure -1.1. Further, 10 km radius study area map and Google
map are given in figure 1.2 and Figure -1.3 respectively
Table 1.2: Environmental Setting
1. Name of Project Proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plant at
Khordha at Somanathpur of Khordha district,
Odisha by M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
2. Project Proponent M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited

3. Plant location Village Somanathpur, Khordha district ,
Odisha by M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
4. Coordinates A: 20°13‟23.51”N, 85°57‟19.10”E
B: 20°13‟50.38”N, 85°57‟31.58”E
C: 20°13‟34.13”N, 85°57‟67.04”E
D: 20°13‟06.64”N, 85°57‟50.15”E
5. General elevation above MSL 243 ft
6. Nearest highways NH 5 – 1.3 km (ES)
7. Present land use at the site Barren Land
8. Nearest railway station Khurda Road Railway Station: 18 km(NE)
9. Nearest Airport Biju Patnaik International Airport: 35 km(NE)
10. Nearest major water bodies Narsingh Nala -9 (N)
11. Nearest town/City Khordha Town-10 (NE)
12. Interstate boundary None within 10 km
13. Archaeologically important None within 10 km
places

14. Protected areas as per Wildlife None within 10 km
Protection Act, 1972 (Tiger
reserve, Elephant reserve,
Biospheres, National parks,
Wildlife sanctuaries, community
reserves and conservation
reserves)
15. Reserved / Protected Forests Jariput Protected Forest-1.5(N)
Barunai Reserved Forest-4.7(NE)
16. Defence Installations None within 10 km
17. Seismicity The proposed project is located in Seismic
Zone III as per IS: 1893 and all designs will
be as per IS Codes
18. Industries 1. M/s Jagannath Stone Crusher-1km ( E )
2. M/s. Mahima Stone Crusher-0.5km (S)
3. M/S Bajrangi Stone Crusher-1 km(SE)
4. M/S Baba sando Stone Crusher-0.75 (SE)

Figure-1.1: Location Map

Figure 1.2: 10 Km Radius Study Area Map of Proposed IOCL Plant

Figure-1.3 Google Map of 10 Km Radius
1.3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
EIA integrates the environmental concerns in the developmental activities so that it can enable
the integration of environmental concerns and mitigation measures in project development. The
study includes detailed characterization of existing status of environment in an area of 10 km
radius around project site. In order to get an idea about the existing state of the environment,
various environmental attributes such as meteorology, air quality, water quality, soil quality,
noise level, ecology and socio-economic environment are studied /monitored. Environmental
baseline monitoring has been carried out during November, 2017 to January, 2018 and used to
identify potential significant impacts. The report is prepared as per the Standard ToR and
additional ToR granted at the SEAC Odisha meeting held on 15th September, 2017.
The scope of the study broadly includes:
 To describe the project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out
the proposed development
 To establish the baseline environmental and social scenario of the project site and its
surroundings

 To identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be
affected by the project
 To identify, predict and evaluate environmental and social impacts during the construction
and operation phase of the project
 To study the existing traffic load, predict the increment in traffic due the project and to
suggest the management plan for the same
 Details about conservation of resources
 To design and specify the monitoring and audit requirements necessary to ensure the
implementation and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures adopted
 To access risk during construction and operation phase and formulate the disaster
management plan onsite and offsite
 To evaluate proposed pollution control measures and delineate Environmental Management

Plan (EMP)
 To delineate post-project environmental quality monitoring program to be pursued by M/s.

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
1.4. APPLICABLE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
With respect to prevention and control of environmental pollution, the following Acts and Rules
of Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India govern the proposed project:
1 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as amended in 1988

1 Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 as amended in 1987
2 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 amended in 1991 and Environment (Protection)
rules, 1986 and amendments thereafter
3 The Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016
4 Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules,
2016
5 The Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989
(amended, 1994 and 2004).
6 E- Waste (Management) Amendment Rules, 2018
7 The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 and as amended
8 EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 as amended
9 The Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness and Response) Rules,
1996.
10 The Factories Act, 1948 (amended 1987)
11 The Inflammable Substances Act, 1952.
12 The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (amended 2001).
The Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (amended 2005).

13 The Public Liability Insurance Rules, 1991 (amended 1992).
The Public Liability Insurance Rules, 1991 (amended 1993).
14 The Petroleum Act, 1934.
The Petroleum Rules, 2002.
15 The Explosives Act, 1884 (amended till 1983).
The Gas Cylinder Rules, 2004,
The Static and Mobile Pressure Vessels (Unfired) Rules, 1981 (amended 2002).
The Explosives Rules, 1983 (amended 2002).
1.5. STRUCTURE OF EIA REPORT

EIA report contains baseline data, project description and assessment of impacts and
preparation of Environmental Management Plan and Disaster Management Plan. The report is
organized in following ten chapters:
Executive Summary
This chapter gives the Executive Summary of the EIA report.
Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter describes objectives and methodology for EIA.
Chapter 2: Project Description

This chapter gives a brief description of the facilities and infrastructure required for proposed
project etc. This chapter also gives outline of status of completion of construction activities as
this is project.
Chapter 3: Description of the Environment

This chapter presents details of the baseline environmental status for microclimate, air quality,
noise, traffic, water quality, soil quality, flora, fauna and socio-economic status etc.
Chapter 4: Anticipated Environmental Impact and Mitigation Measures

This chapter discusses the possible sources of pollution and environmental impacts due to the
project during construction and operation phases and suggests the mitigation measures.
5. Analysis of Alternative Sites and Technology

This chapter describes the analysis of various alternative sites and the technology required for
the project.
6. Environmental Monitoring Program

This chapter provides recommendations for Environment Management Plan (EMP) including
mitigation measures for minimizing the negative environmental impacts of the project.
Environmental monitoring requirements for effective implementation ofmitigative measures
during construction as well as during operation of the project along with required institutional

arrangements for their implementation. Budgetarycost estimates for mitigation measures are
also brought out.
Chapter 7: Additional Studies

This chapter covers information about Public Consultation and Risk Assessment Studies for the
construction and operation phase, the safety precautions that are taken during construction
phase.
Chapter 8: Project Benefits

This chapter presents the benefits from this project.
Chapter 9: Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis
Chapter 10: Environmental Management Plan

This chapter deals with the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed Project
and indicates measures proposed to minimize the likely impacts on the environment during
construction and operation phases and budgetary allocation for the same.
Chapter 11: Disclosure of Consultants

This chapter deals with the details of consultants engaged and the NABET accreditation details
of environmental consultants.
1.6. COMPLIANCE TO TOR

State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), Odisha vide their Ref. No. 619/20018/32-IND2/08-
2017/121 dated October 06, 2017 forwarded the prescribed TOR of the EIA Study for the
proposed project. A copy of the same is also enclosed as Annexure-I. While preparing the EIA
Report, all the points of the approved TOR are addressed in the EIA Report. The following table
summarizes all the TOR Conditions and vis-à-vis their compliance in the EIA Report:
SN Description Compliance in the Draf EIA Report

TOR Conditions
1 Executive Summary of the Project Executive Summary has been given in the beginning of
the EIA report.
2 Project Description & Project The project will have storage capacity of 1800 MT in 3
Benefits MSV of MT each. Bottling plant will have filled.
3 Land use details of the site based SN Landuse/ Area in Are

on satellite imagery. Landcover Sq. a in
Class Km. %
1 Agriculture 148.71 47
2 Builtup Land 17.05 5
3 Fallow Land 67.61 22
4 Mining Area 8.06 3

TOR Conditions
5 Vegetation 71.69 23
6 Water 0.92 0
Total Area 314 100
4 Design details of all the tanks The mounded storage of LPG has proved to be safer
compared to above ground storage vessels since it
provides intrinsically passive and safe environment and
eliminates the possibility of Boiling Liquid Expanding
Vapour Explosion (BLEVE). The cover of the mound
protects the vessel from fire engulfment, radiation from a
fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism.
The area of land required to locate a mounded system is
minimal compared to conventional storage. Excavation
up to a depth of 0.75 m is done for construction of
mounded bullet foundation (below FGL). Cathodic
protection through sacrificial anode method has been
provided for all the three bullets to prevent them from
corrosion apart from 1000 microns or more PU Coating
after proper surface preparation.
A typical drawing of the mounded bullets system is as

shown in Figure 2.3.
5 Proposal for safety buffer zone Shown in the layout in Chapter -2 & Figure 2.1
(250m) around the proposed site
with map.
6 A list of industries within 10 KM 1. M/s Jagannath Stone Crusher-1km ( E )
radius of the project. 2. M/s. Mahima Stone Crusher-0.5km (S)
3. M/S BajrangiStone Crusher-1km (SE)
4. M/S Baba sando Stone Crusher-0.75 (SE
7 List of villages / habitations and
population within 5 Km Sl .No Village Name
1 Somnathpur
2 Kipadar
3 Kurarhmal
4 Dadhimchhagarhia
5 Dalaiput
6 Managabindapur
7 Nilakanthapur
8 Jhinkijhari
9 Nijigarh Tapang
10 Baipur
11 Nandanpur
12 Dadhimachhagadia

TOR Conditions
13 Madhabpur
14 Mangalpur
8 Distance of the proposed site Chandaka – Ddampada Wild Life Sanctuary -

from the boundary of Chandaka – 27.5km(NE)
Ddampada Wild Life Sanctuary
and its Eco- Sensitive Zone.
9 Location of other National Park Jariput Protected Forest-1.5(N)
and Wild life sanctuary / Reserve Barunai Reserved Forest-4.7(NE)
Forest within 10 km radius.
10 Animated computer Model for The traffic studies have been conducted to know the
prospective years regarding prevailing traffic volumes on the roads near the project
truck/Tanker movement from site. The results indicated that the post project scenarios
safety and risk points of view
will contribute to addition in existing traffic, the level of
service will continue to be GOOD. Traffic will continue
to run smoothly without congestion and no widening of
road is anticipated
11 Layout plan with provision of 11214 Sq Mt areas earmarked for parking of 50 nos
Truck / tanker parking area filled cylinder truck. Shown in layout as....
.Earmarking of area for parking of
lorries to avoid congestion.
12 Details of the storage as well as
technical specifications with ITEM TECHNICAL DETAILS
safety aspects & standards. Mounded Storage Vessel 600MT
Design Pressure 15.4kg/cm2
Operating Pressure 11 kg/cm2
Hydro testing Pressure 20.83 kg/cm2
Design Code PD5500
Corrosion Allowance 1.5mm
Design temperature 65˚C
13 Site details including satellite
imagery for 5 Km around the site. Shown in the Figure 3.4 of Chapter -3
14 Total land has been purchased Related Document attached in Annexure II
from ShreeJagannath Temple
Trust, Puri. Document related to
transfer of in favour of the
industry is to be submitted.
15 Land use along with maps, Addressed in Chapter -3, point no 3.3 & Table 3.1
vegetation, ecology, flora &
fauna.
16 Demography & Socio-economics  The population in the study area is 140645
of the area
 The Sex Ratio (Female per 1000 Male) is 951.

TOR Conditions
 Scheduled Tribes (ST) as percentage of total
population is 8.7%. Scheduled
 Castes (SC) as percentage to the total population are

13.21%.
 Overall literacy rate, according to 2011 Census is

77.72%. The male literacy rate is 55% while female
literacy rate is 45%.
 The percentage of main workers is 33.2% of total

population and the Percentage of marginal workers is
25.9 %. The percentage of non-workers is 66.8%.
17 Baseline data collection for air, water and soil :
i. Ambient Air Quality monitoring PM10 (µg/m3)

for PM10, PM2.5, S02, A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
NOx Min 158.4 126.7 118.5 155.8 90.4 124 94.2 90.2
Max 255.8 268 264.6 210.4 114.3 160.1 111.5 106.3
PM2.5 (µg/m3)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 52.3 70.7 72.1 61.5 39.7 53.5 41 40
Max 119.7 134.7 166.8 93.1 67 89.5 70.5 62.7
3
SO2 (µg/m )
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 38.0 40.0 37.5 30.8 23.5 18.5 15.0 18.0
Max 51.0 62.0 54.0 40.2 36.0 33.0 24.0 29.0
3
NOx (µg/m )
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 52.5 52.0 51.9 45.6 42.0 39.0 33.0 37.0
Max 72.0 85.0 88.0 62.0 61.0 58.0 48.0 61.0
ii. Background levels of

hydrocarbons (methane & non- BDL
methane HC) and VOCs
iii. Soil sample analysis A total of seven samples within the study area were
collected and analysed. It has been observed that the
texture of soil is mostly Sandy Clay in the study area. It
has been observed that the pH of the soil quality ranged
from 6.80 to 7.8 indicating that the soil is neutral to
slightly alkaline in nature. The electrical conductivity
was observed to be in the range of 16.0 to 120
mmhos/cm
iv. Base line underground and Six locations of ground water and two locations of
surface water quality in surface water samples have been analysed for various
the vicinity of project parameters as per CPCB/ MoEF&CC guidelines. The
analysis has been given in Chapter-3, Section – 3.7,

TOR Conditions
Table No. – 3.11 and 3.12 respectively of EIA/ EMP
report.
The same has been enclosed as Annexure – IV.
v. Climatology & Meteorology Relative Wind Predominant
Temperature
Month Humidity, Speed, wind direction
including wind speed, wind (°C)
% m/s
direction, temperature, rainfall Min Max Min Max Mean
November
etc 2017
10.5 34.2 51 78 0.1
December
17.5 32.3 55 76 0.1 NE
2017
January
10.2 26.4 48 78 0.1
2018
vi. Measurement of Noise levels Leq
Villages Leq (night)
(day)
Project Site 61 48
Managobindapur 61 49
Jhinkijhari 61 48
Dhaulimuhan 61 49
Taratua 63 53
Dalaiput 62 51
Madhabpur 61 48
Dadhimachhagadia 61 54
18 Details of water consumption and Water Consumption Wastewater Generation &
Disposal
source of water supply, waste Sl. Quantity Quantity Disposal Method
Particulars
water generation, treatment and No (m3/day) (m3/day)
utilization of treated water 1 Domestic 8 6.5 septic tanks and
generated from the facilities and water disposed off
effluent disposal and measures for requirement through soak pits
2 Industrial 5 4 Waste is treated
release for effluent in case of fire water in ETP and used
requirement for gardening of
(Cylinder green belt areas.
washing)
3 Gardening 2
Total 15 10.5
19. Storm water system should have During rainy season, the rain water will be discharged
provision to prevent any through properly designed storm water drain after
unintended substances in the drain passing through vapour trap.
to flow out with storm water.
20 Detailed solid waste generation, No industrial solid waste will be generated during the
collection, segregation, its bottling process. Damaged cylinders will be segregated
recycling and reuse, treatment and & stored on site prior to disposal as scrap metal.
disposal.
21 Details of vapour Recovery The unloading operation is carried out with the help of
system for the Storage taks and compressors. During unloading of LPG , vapour from the
lorries. MSV will be sucked at 10.0 kg/cm2 (max) and will be
compressed in LPG compressor to 13.0 kg/cm2. The
compressed LPG vapour will pressurize the Road Tanker
and LPG ( liquid) will be transferred from Road Tanker
to MSV. The Road Tanker will be connected to liquid

TOR Conditions
line and vapour line from MSV by unloading hose with
flow ckeck valve and isolation valve respectively.
Vapour LPG line shall be connected to the compressor
through 02 ball valves i.e. one for suction and one for
discharge.
22 Assessment of impact on air,
water, soil, solid/hazardous waste Addressed in Chapter 4.
and noise levels.
23 Details of proposed preventive 1. Regular NDT, Haydrotesting & painting etc. to be
measures for leakages and carried out for the unloading lines to avoid leak and
accident rupture
2. Effective preventive maintenance plan to
3. Hydrocarbon /Fire detectors.
4. Electrical spark proof equipment‟s as per PESO
regulations
5. Work permit system
6. Minimize the number trucks in TLD area to reduce
the risk, besides, daily checking of safety features of
the Tankers inside the plant.
7. Supervision over road tanker unloading activity
8. Safety interlocking systems for pumps, compressors,

bullets
9. Emergency Shutdown System.
24 Adequate width of approach road The plant is located on a P.W.D maintained road of 10
to avoid congestion and to have meters.
safe exit in emergencies.
25 Type of seismic zone. The proposed project is located in Seismic Zone III
26 Environmental Management Plan Addressed in chapter 10
27 Risk assessment & Disaster Management Plan
i. Identification of hazards Addressed in chapter 7
ii. Consequence Analysis
iii. Preventive measures
iv. Risk Assessment should also
include leakage during
storage, handling,
transportation and proposed
measures for risk reduction
v. Fire & Explosion hazard
vi. Risk assessment as per
existing guidelines.

TOR Conditions
28 Risk Assessment should also Impact of each hazard scenario along with mitigative
include follow up/compliance to measures shown in R.A Report enclosed at Annexure-V.
safety & hazardous material
management facilities; cathodic
protection to mounded bullets;
possibility of fire and explosion
accident; Risk assessment for
accidents at site and its impact on
adjoining area, risk mitigation
measures, disaster management
plan; onsite & off-site emergency
plan.
29 OISD-144 rules should be The plant design and fire fighting system is as per OISD
followed. 144.
30 Gas detection system & Gas monitoring System is proposed at critical location.
monitoring system shall be
provided.
31 Interlocking shut down device Interlocking shut down is connected to Emergency Shut
(ISD) should be connected to Down (E.S.D). Sprinkler system operates automatically
automatic shut down& auto on rise of temperature.
operation fire hydrant network.
32 Action plan for firefighting This being a L.P.G bottling plant, fire fighting system is
facility as per OISD 117 as per OISD 144.
33 Details of proposed occupational Health Surveillance program for the employees and other
labour
i. To which chemicals, workers The workers are not directly exposed to any chemical.
are exposed directly or
indirectly
ii. Whether these chemicals are N.A
within Threshold limit Values (
TLV) Permissible Exposure
Levels as per ACGIH
recommendation
iii. What measures company NA
have taken to keep these
chemicals within PEL/TLV
iv. How the workers are evaluated Periodic medical check up will be carried out.
concerning their exposure to
chemicals during pre –
placement and periodical
medical monitoring.
v. What are onsite and offsite Discussed in chapter.7
emergency plan during
chemicals disaster.
vi. Liver function tests (LFT) NA
during pre placement and
periodical examination.

TOR Conditions
34 Environmental Monitoring Described in Chapter 6, Section 6.2, Table 6.1
program
35 Any litigation pending against the No litigation is pending against the project.
project and / or any direction /
order passed by any Court of Law
against the project, if so, details
thereof
36 Green Belt development plan in About 37.5% of the total area shall be maintained under
33% area to be put in place green belt development. Evergreen trees having thick
foliage shall be planted within the green belt. Only native
species of trees, observed to prosper well in the area,
shall be planted. More trees shall be planted on roadsides
around plant & offices in consultation with local forest
officials.
37 Corporate Social Responsibility Sl No CSR Details

Amount
Program to be formulated based (Lacs)
Providing Drinking water facilities
on the results of local socio
(Borewell) and street lights in the
economic survey on parameters 1 road from village: Kuradh mall to 40.0
like access to water, health status , Village Kaipadar, Tehsil: Khurdha
literacy & sanitation. Dist: Khurdha.
Demographic features of the Construction of Community hall near
locality to ascertained. At Least 2 panchayat office for the village: 30.00
Kaipadar, Dist: Khurdha.
5% of the total project cost must Construction of Boundary wall and
be dedicated for this purpose with renovation of of the UP school at
3 20.00
time bound specific financial Village: Deulatangi, Kaipadar
commitment. Panchayat. Dist.: Khurdha
Construction of Community hall for
4 the village: Somnathpur, Dist: 20.00
Khurdha.
i. Does the company have a well Environment and Safety Policy has been approved by the
laid down Environment Policy Board of Directors. Details provided in Chapter 10,
approved by this Board of Section 10.3.7
Directors? If so it may be
detailed in the EIA Report.
ii. Does the Environmental Policy Yes, It prescribed for compliance of Standard Operating
prescribe for standard operating Practice.
process / procedures to bring
into focus any infringement /
deviation/ violation of the
environmental or forest norms /
conditions ? . If so it may be
detailed in the EIA Report
iii. What is the hierarchical As per SOP, Environmental issues of the plant will be
system or Administrative order dealt by the Safety officer, who reports to Chief Plant
of the company to deal with the Manager. Subsequent higher authorities having control
Environmental issues and for over the plant activities are GM (LPG) and Chief
ensuring compliance with the General Manager of Odisha State Office.

TOR Conditions
EC conditions. Details of this
system may be given.
iv. Does the company have a Non compliance will be reported to the competent
system of reporting of non – authority.
compliance / violations of
environmental norms to the
Board of Directors of the
company and / or shareholders
or stakeholders at large?. This
reporting mechanism should be
detailed in the EIA Report.
38 Public hearing issues raised and The public hearing for the Proposed Khordha LPG
commitments made by the project Bottling Plant at Somanathpur of Khordha district,
proponent on the same should be Odisha has been conducted on 20-07-2018 asper New
included separately in EIA/ EMP Environment Impact Assessment Notification dated 14th
Report in the form of tabular chart September2006 and as per TOR conditions issued by
with financial budget for State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), Odisha, and
complying with the commitments the details are Public Hearing MOM and photographs
made. attached as Annexure - VIII.
39 A tabular chart with index for
point wise compliance of above
TORs
i. All documents should be Complied
properly indexed, page
numbered
ii. Period / date of data Data were collected during one season of 3 months
collection should be clearly November 2017 to January 2018
indicated
iii. The letter/application for Attached in Annexure-I
Environmental should quote the
SEAC file no and also attach a
copy of the letter as an annexure
to the final EIA-EMP Report.
iv. The index of the final Complied
EIA-EMP report must indicate
the specific chapter and page no
of the EIA-EMP Report
v. As per the circular no.J- This being a new project, compliance of condition of
11011/618/2010-IA.II(I), earlier E.C does not arise.
DATED 30.05.2012, certified
report of the status of
compliance of the conditions
stipulated in the environment
clearance for existing operations
of the project, should be
obtained from Regional Office
Ministry of Environment, Forest
and Climate Change, as may be

TOR Conditions
applicable.
vi. A copy of Consent to Consent to Operate will be obtained prior to
Operate accorded by the Odisha commissioning of the plant.
State Pollution Control Board
(OSPCB) for existing plant
along with point wise
compliance report.
vii. While preparing the EIA Complied
report, the instructions for the
proponents and instructions for
the consultants issued by MoEF
vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-
IA.II (I) dated 4th August, 2009;
which are available on the
website of this Ministry should
also be followed.
viii. The consultants involved ULTRA-TECH
in the preparation of EIA-EMP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND
report should be an accredited CONSULTANCY
with quality council of india (Gazzeted By MoEF)
(QCI) / National Accreditation Unit No. 206, 224, 225 Jai Commercial Complex,
Board of Education and training Eastern Express Highway,
(NABET) and a certificate in Opp Cadbury Factory, Khopat, Thane (West) – 400 061
this regard should be annexed in Accredited EIA Consultant Organization by NABET,
the EIA/EMP reports. Data QCI, New Delhi at S. No.146 (MoEF&CC) List of
provided by other Accredited EIA Consultant Organizations (Rev. 62
organanization. February 05, 2018).
40 THE TORS PRESCRIBED Noted

SHALL BE VALID FOR A
PERIOD OF THREE YEARS
FOR SUBMISSION OF THE
EIA-EMP REPORT ALONG
WITH PUBLIC HEARING
PROCEEDINGS ( WHEREVER
STIPULATED) AS PER
MOEF&CC, GOVT OF INDIA
O,M, NO. J-11013/41/2006-IA-
II(I) (P), DATED 07.11.2014

CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT
The Proposed LPG Bottling Plant at Khurdha by IOCL (Khurdha BP) will be receiving LPG
from various refineries and port locations in bulk containers, will store them in mounded bullets
at the plant and will fill/ bottle domestic and commercial cylinders of different capacities with
LPG. No process is involved in bottling the cylinders with LPG and hence No by-products/
additional products are generated/ manufactured during the operations. The proposed storage
capacity of LPG is 1800MT. Hence, the present proposal is classified under Schedule 6(b) &
Category „B‟ according to EIA Notification 2006 & subsequent amendments.
2.2 NEED AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT
Due to increase in urbanization and improved quality of life the demand for its consumption is
increasing and also in rural areas LPG is being provided. In order to increase its new customer
base and to serve the existing customers in a better way M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. is
proposing to set up the new LPG Bottling Plant in addition to existing 2 Nos. at Balasore and
Jharsuguda. With the present LPG Bottling facilities in Odisha, IOCL is unable to meet the
growing demand of LPG in the State of Odisha.
The current demand of packed LPG is about 154 TMTPA in the state of Odisha for the year of
2017-18. Current LPG demand is being met by 2 no. of LPG Bottling Plants at Balasore and
Jharsaguda with a bottling capacity of 150 TMTPA and the balance is met by other Bottling
Plants in neighbouring states.
The project demand up to 2020-21 is expected to increase by 230 TMTPA and by 2025-26
would be approximately 335 TMTPA. The increase in demand is being met by capacity
augmentation of existing LPG bottling plants and by the proposed grass root project at Khordha.
Total project cost for the proposed project is around Rs 161.59 Crore.
2.3 LAYOUT
The proposed Khordha LPG bottling plant is located at plot no701, 703,704, 706, 707(P) & 708
(P) at mouza Somanathpur of Khordha district, Odisha and total land area is 32 acres.
The plant layout is showing various units of proposed bottling plant in Figure-2.1. The land use
of the project site is given in Table-2.1.

Table-2.1: Land Break Up
Sl. No. Particulars Area (SqM) Percentage (%)
1. Buildings 1523 1.176
2. Operational Area 12150 9.382
3. Mounded Bullet Area 1540 1.189
4. Car Parking 240 0.185
5. Green belt development area 48562 37.5
6. Truck Parking Area 20836 16.090
7. Fire Water tanks 300 0.232
8. Approach roads, Paved areas and
44348 34.246
other misc area
Total Area 129499 100
The design considerations for the site layout of the proposed project are provided as below:
 Design Parameters: Temperature, Pressure, Internal Corrosion, Hydro Test Pressure
 Design Procedure: As per the Design Code: ASME SEC. VIII or equivalent duly approved
by PESO.
 Piping layout is as per OISD-150. One liquid line, one vapour line, 2no‟s SRVs, ROVs on
liquid and vapour lines

Figure 2.1: Layout Showing Proposed Storage Facilities
2.4 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT

The salient features of the proposed Khorda BP are presented in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2: Salient Features of Proposed facility

No.
1 Total Land 32 Acres
2 Capacity of MSV 3x600 MT
3 Power requirement 400 KW
Source: Central Electricity Supplu Utility, Odisha
D.G Sets as Backup - 1x250 kVA and 1x700 kVA
4 Water requirement Total water requirement approx. 15 m3/day including
domestic and fire water
Source: Bore well within the premises.
5 Man power Required Manpower = 80
(Direct and indirect to include contract labors and security
personnel).
6 Project Cost INR 161.59 Crore
7 Fire Fighting Facilities
A Fire water storage 3 X 2500 m3
B Fire water pumps Diesel Driven Pumps of 3 * 700 KL/hr capacity

No.
C Jockey pumps Electric motor driven 2* 20m3/hr capacity

C Water sprinkler / Deluge At all relevant places (will be converted to auto sprinkler
system system supported by PLC based ILSD)
D Fire Hydrant/monitor As prescribed by OISD
piping network
E DCP & CO2 extinguishers As prescribed by OISD
F Gas Monitoring System As prescribed by OISD
G ILSD As prescribed by OISD
2.4.1 Proposed Schedule and Approval for Implementation
The construction of LPG storage and related activities will commence on receipt of
Environmental Clearance (EC) from SEIAA, Odisha and Consent to Establish (CTE) from
OPCB and other statutory approvals/NOCs as required. It is envisaged that construction
activities will take 18-20 months post the necessary approvals.
2.5 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
2.5.1 LPG Receipt and Storage
LPG will be received through road tankers of 18 & 21 MT capacities from Paradip Refinery,
Haldia Refinery, IPPL Haldia or HPCL Vizag Refinery and will be stored in 03 nos. of
mounded bullets having 600 MT capacities each. Each storage vessels will be provided with a
single liquid inlet/ outlet line at bottom, one vapour inlet/outlet line at top connected with LPG
vapour compressor. Two numbers of safety valves will be provided on the top of each storage
vessel. All the storage vessels will be provided with Servo level gauges and Radar type Level
Gauges having remote digital readouts at LPG Pump house and Control Room.
2.5.2 Unloading
LPG in road tankers will be unloaded in TLD shed comprising 8 nos. of unloading bays. The
road tankers will be connected to liquid and vapour lines from Mounded Bullet by unloading
arm provided with excess flow check valve and isolation valve. Road tankers will be provided
with Roto gauges, Safety Relief Valve. Vapour line will be connected to the compressor
through a four way valve. LPG will be unloaded from the road tanker by differential pressure
method. During LPG unloading, vapour from one storage bullet will be sucked and will be
compressed in LPG compressor. The compressed LPG vapour will be fed to bulk tanker to
pressurize it and LPG (Liquid) will be transferred from the road tanker to the Bullet.
After LPG unloading, the compressor suction will be reversed by changing the four way valve
position and LPG vapour will be recovered from road tanker through the same compressor and
discharged to Mounded Bullets till the suction pressure of compressor falls from an initial value
of 11.6 Kg/cm2 to 2 Kg/cm2.

2.5.3 LPG Pump House
 LPG Pumps
Vertical Cam Type LPG pumps will take suction from bottom of Mounded Bullets and
deliver liquid to carousal for filling in empty cylinders.
 LPG Vapour Compressors
3 nos. of screw type LPG vapour compressors have been provided. The compressor is used
for unloading of LPG from road tankers by pressurization and thereafter for recovery of
LPG vapour from the road tankers when unloading will be complete. The compressor will
be equipped with a suction receiver (knock out drum) to trap any condensed liquid.
2.5.4 Air Compressor and Air Drying Unit
2 nos. of non lubricated screw type air compressor will be provided for supply of compressed
air for plant requirement as well as for preparation of instrument air at a pressure of 7 Kg/cm 2a.
Compressed air shall be generally required as plant air/service air and a part of the compressed
air passes through air drying unit for generation of instrument air at 7 Kg/cm2a and relative
humidity at -15ºC. Instrument air will be required for LPG handling and filling system,
operation of instruments including ROVs and thermal fuse bulbs etc. The air compressor and air
drying unit are located at a sufficient distance from LPG handling facilities
2.5.5 LPG Cylinder filling and associated facilities
Empty cylinders from empty cylinder storage shed are drawn in the filling shed by chain
conveyer. LPG will be filled by means of rotary machines called "Carousel". The carousel
consists of a rotating frame with running wheels on rail (and corresponding rail), a central
column for gas and air and which rotates with the carousel frame a hydraulic driving unit. The
speed of the driving unit will be variable so that the rotation of the carousel can be adapted to
various filling capacities. The Proposed 2 Nos. of Carousal/Filling Machine each would be
equipped with 24 filling guns.
LPG filling machine mounted on the carousel works on gross weighing principle. The machine
will be preset for the net filling required in the cylinders. The cylinders are placed on the
machine and the filling head will be connected to the cylinder valve and LPG supply valve
opens. The operator punches rate of each incoming LPG cylinders and filling machine of the
corresponding cylinder will be adjusted for the respective tare weight of the cylinders.Total
grass weight when reaches the prefixed level, supply gets automatically cut off.
Checking of weight and Leak testing
After filling, every cylinder will be checked for its weight on a check weighing scale and the
cylinders having less or more weight are segregated and are sent through a integrated weight
correction unit. The cylinders are checked for valve leakage by Gas Detector and ”O”-Ring leak
by Pressure Tester, then checking for body and bung leaks by totally submerging cylinders
under water as per prevailing practice. After leak testing, sample of cylinders are segregated for

Statistical Quality Checking (SQC), then cylinders are sent to filled cylinder storage shed by
means of chain conveyers for loading in the packed trucks.
 Air removal from cylinders and LPG vapour filling - Purging Unit
This unit will be required to fill LPG vapour in cylinders (new and repaired) after sucking the
air from cylinders by vacuum pumps. This operation is required to eliminate the possibility of
forming explosive mixture with air. Vacuum will be created upto 300 mm of Hg inside the
cylinder and then LPG vapour will be injected into the cylinder up to a pressure of 1.5 to 2
kg/cm2 before using them for filling of LPG.
 Evacuation of leaky cylinders
Defective valves of LPG Cylinders shall be replaced by using Valve Change without
Evacuation Unit. In this unit the defective valves are replaced without evacuating the LPG
from the defective cylinders.
 Storage of filled cylinders and transportation
Filled cylinders after leak testing, weight testing and fixing safety caps will be stacked in the
filled cylinder shed near the delivery end as per rules laid down by OISD-144/Gas Cylinder
Rules, 1981. Filled cylinders will be delivered only to the PESO approved godown of
authorized LPG distributors. Drivers of the trucks carrying LPG shall have valid license and
training in safety and fire fighting procedures.
Note: Whole filling shed are comes under the network of medium velocity sprinkler system
2.6 PROCESS FLOW CHART
There is no manufacturing process involved in the LPG bottling plant. The process involved can
be divided into 4 Stages:
 Receipt of Bulk LPG through LPG bulk trucks.
 Storage of LPG in mounded storage vessel tanks as per OISD-150.
 Filling of the LPG into cylinders (domestic/ commercial/ industrial).
 Dispatch of LPG cylinders through Vehicles (Packed cylinder Truck)

Figure 2.2: Process Flow Chart
2.7 INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE FACILITY
2.7.1 Description of Mounded Bullets
The mounded storage of LPG has proved to be safer compared to above ground storage vessels
since it provides intrinsically passive and safe environment and eliminates the possibility of
Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion (BLEVE). The cover of the mound protects the
vessel from fire engulfment, radiation from a fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or
vandalism. The area of land required to locate a mounded system is minimal compared to
conventional storage. Excavation up to a depth of 0.75 m is done for construction of mounded
bullet foundation (below FGL). Cathodic protection through sacrificial anode method has been
provided for all the three bullets to prevent them from corrosion apart from 1000 microns or
more PU Coating after proper surface preparation.
A typical drawing of the mounded bullets system is as shown in Figure 2.3.

Figure 2.3: Typical Mounded Bullet System
2.7.2 TT Parking Lot
The proposed Bottling Plant has provision of parking 50 Bullet Trucks (TT).& 50 filled cylinder
trucks. The TT Parking lot will have the provision of rest room for the TT crews. It will also be
ensured that all the Tank/Bulk Trucks will come to TT Parking Lot first and then upon consent
of the security guards it will be advised to procced further to the Bottling Plant. These will
ensure safety and prevent unwanted accidents/hazards along the road side.
2.8 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM
The gas leak detection, fire prevention and control system to be implemented at proposed
Khordha LPG bottling plant will be the latest and will comply with the norms prescribed under
OISD 144 and OISD 150. The following are the systems which will be provided at Khordha
LPG bottling plant:-
2.8.1 Gas Monitoring System:
The system consists of gas detecting sensors linked to a computerized processing unit and with
alarm panels at control room, filing shed, plant manager‟s cabin as well as security gate having
audio / visual alarms and MIMIC Panel to alert the plant personnel. The sensors are located at
all sensitive or potential hazard areas in the plant as indicated in OISD 144.
2.8.2 Air/Vapor Extraction System:
It is a blower with ducts extended to different operating points in filling shed. The blower
extracts any leaking LPG vapor from the floor level and cold flares the same to the free
atmosphere at the height of 1.5 meter from the highest points of eves of the shed. This system is

interlocked with filling system, such that the blower has to be started before the carousel is
started for filling operation. Blower will run during filling operation continuously. A standby
blower is also given to meet situations where one of the blowers is out of order. In this way
there is no accumulation of LPG at plant floor level and any minor leaks due to operation is
immediately evacuated and not allowed to reach the lower explosive limit.
2.8.3 Remote (Control) Operated Valves:
These are pneumatically operated quick shut off valves provided on LPG pipelines (in liquid
line) connected to LPG equipment (like storage vessels, carousel, TLD lines) with actuating
points located both remotely and nearer to operating facilities in plant. When actuated, the
valves will close within 30 seconds, stopping the flow of LPG in pipelines. Besides, in case of
leakage of LPG through flange joint or rupture of pipeline, the Excess Flow Check Valve are
operated restricting the leakage of LPG to the sections between two Gate Valves in LPG pipe
line and the LPG in upstream area and the storage bullet area is cut off from the leaking point,
thereby preventing major leakage or fire.
2.8.4 High Level Alarm:
This kind of alarm is installed in storage bullets and other vessels. In case of filling of more than
85 % the alarm will be actuated at Pump House and remote operated valves installed in storage
vessel will close the flow of LPG to vessel. The actuation of remote operated valve and alarm is
interlocked with the level of LPG liquid in vessel.
2.8.5 Fire Hydrant Network:
All round the plant in licensed and non licensed area there are fire water line ring network. In
both licensed & non licensed area there are intermittent fire hydrants and water motitors in a
specific distance. Further in licensed area there are deluge valve in all critical areas (called as
fire zones), as per OISD 144. MV sprinkler system can be operated from deluge valves.
2.8.6 Emergency Trip Buttons and Manual call Points:
These emergency push buttons are provided at strategic places in the plant. In case of
emergency, when the emergency trip button is actuated action takes place as specified in the
clause 11.11 of OISD 144 which involves tripping of electricity to all the operating equipment
in the hazardous area of the plant, closure of all remote operated valves on the LPG pipelines
and sounding of siren. Operation of manual call point will denote an abnormal situation alerting
the plant personnel and will involve the sounding of siren only. An annunciator panel installed
at manned control room will indicate the location from where Manual Call Point is actuated.
These points are provided at strategic locations in the plant.
2.8.7 Medium Velocity Spray System :
This sprinkle system is provided in the operating areas of hazardous areas of plant like sheds
involving filling, storage and operation on cylinders, tank lorry decantation shed, expose flanges
of mounded storage, LPG pump house, etc., as per the specifications given in OISD 144 / 150.

Adequate storage of fire water in exclusive above ground tanks is maintained as per the fire
water calculation. There is a fire water pipeline system which is constantly kept pressurized
with a minimum of 7 kg per centimeter square at farthest point using jockey pumps which start
and stop automatically at preset pressures. The fire water pipeline is connected to the MV spray
system through deluge valves where an air water balance is maintained. The MV Spray system
is equipped with a quartzite bulb fire detection system. When the temperature reaches 79º C the
bulb will be burst releasing the air water balance at the deluge valve and thereby starting the
sprinkling of water. This will reduce the pressure in the pipeline which will actuate the fire
water pumps by a preset mechanical pressure switch. This process will repeat until other fire
pump start and same will stabilize when quantum of fire water as per designed scenario of fire
fighting is achieved.Thus the entire system of fire protection is automatic.
2.8.8 Interlock Shut Down System:
As per OISD 144 all the plant shall have Inter locked Shut Down System (ILSD) in place. It is a
combination of syncrhonised activity to control an emergency situation in a far better way. In
the plant with ILSD if fire water started at any point (in any 4 In case of actuation of sprinkler
either by bursting of quartzite bulb, or operating sprinkler manually, all plant machineries will
trip electrically, electric siren will be sounded, fire engine will be started, all remote operated
valve in liquid LPG line will be closed and emergency light will be activated (at night). This
system is called Interlocked Shut down System. Apart from that zone of emergency will be
indicated in annuciator panel at control room.
2.8.9 Mutual Aid –
IOCL LPG bottling plant at Khordha shall make mutual aid agreement with neighboring
industries IOCL Jatni terminal, HPCL Jatni LPG BP, BPCL khordha LPG BP and other
Industries alongwith Govt. of Odisha agencies like Fires Station, District Hospital, ambulance
etc.
2.9 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT DETAILS
The plant and equipement details along with sizing are detailed in brief in in Table 2.3, Table
2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and Table 2.7. Further Site Plan Layout is referenced as Annexure III.
Table 2.3: Non-Plant Shed/Building
Sr. Description Size

No.
01 Security Kiosk At Gate 0 3M X 3M
02 Security Room At Gate 1 6.2M X 10M
03 Security Room At Gate 2 5M X 8M
04 Office Building (Ii Storey) 17.5 M x 11.5 M x2M
05 Fire Water Pump House 30 M x 10 M
06 3 Nos. Fire Water Tank 11.25M x 18 M Ø
07 U/ G Water Tank 10 M x 8 M
08 PMCC 10m x 33m

09 DG Room 10m x 12m
10 Car & scooter parking 20m x 6m
11 Canteen, amenity & contract labour change 10m x 15m
room (ii storey)
12 Store 30m x 10m
13 Cylinder scrap yard 15m x 10m
14 Scrap yard 15m x 10m
15 New cylinder storage area 33m x 20m
16 STP plant 30m x 15m
17 Weigh bridge 18m x 3m
18 Sewage Water Treatment Plant 12M x 8M
19 Effulent Treatment Plant 15M x 6M
Table 2.4: Plant Shed/Building
No. Description Size

1 Empty cum Filling Shed 110 M x 50 M
2 Filled Cylinder Shed 50 M X 30 M
3 Loading Shed 33 M X 16 M
4 TLD ( 8 bays) 48 m x 15 m
5 LPG P/H / Compressor house 30 M x 8 M
Table 2.5: Brief Description of Facilities

Sr. No. Description Size
01 Security Kiosk At Gate 0 3M X 3M
02 Security Room At Gate 1 6.2M X 10M
03 Security Room At Gate 2 5M X 8M
04 Office Building (Ii Storey) 17.5 M x 11.5 M
x2M
05 Fire Water Pump House 30 M x 10 M
06 3 Nos. Fire Water Tank 11.25M x 18 M Ø
07 U/ G Water Tank 10 M x 8 M
08 Hsd Storage Tank 15 M x 15 M
09 Car & Scooter Parking ----
10 Canteen, Amenity & Contract 10 M x 15 M
Labour Change Room ( Ii Storey
11 Store 30 M x 10M
12 Dg Room 10 M x 9 M
13 PMCC 10 M x 30 M
14 Control Room Cum S&D 25 M x 8 M
15 Visitor Parking 20 M x 6 M
16 Overhang For Trucks 37 M x 11M
17 Loading Shed 33 M x 16 M
18 Filled Cylinder Shed 50 M x 30M
19 Connecting Platform 16M X 33M
20 Degassing Shed 15 M x 10 M
21 Open Platform For Degassed Cyls 30 M x 8 M
22 STP Plant 30 M x 15 M

Sr. No. Description Size
23 Open Platform For Painted Cyls 30 M x 10 M
24 New Cylinder Storage Area 33 M x 20 M
25 Empty Cum Filling Shed 110 M x 50 M
26 Unloading Shed 25 M x 16 M
27 Overhang For Trucks 29 M x 11M
28 Cylinder Scrap Yard 15 M x 10 M
29 Scrap Yard 15 M x 10 M
30 Cylinder Deshaping Unit 5Mx5M
31 Mounded Storage Vessel 3 x 600 MT
31 Cooling Tower 3Mx3M
33 Lpg Pump / Compressor House 30 M x 8 M
34 Tld (8 Bays) 48 M x 15 M
35 Weigh Bridge 18 M x 3 M
36 Drivers Rest Room 10M x 10 M
37 Emergency Exit Gate 2 Nos
38 Packed Truck Parking Area 9622 M2
39 Bulk Truck Parking Area 11214 M2
40 DP Structure 5 M x 5M
41 Sewage Water Treatment Plant 12M x 8M
42 Effulent Treatment Plant 15M x 6M
43 Rain Water Harvesting 3M x 3M
Table 2.6: Electrical Systems

No. Description Size
1 Transformers To suit requirement – tentatively – 400 kVA
2 Energy Saver To suit requirement – tentatively - 160 kVA
3 Capacitor Bank To suit requirement – tentatively - 125 kVA
4 Battery Charger/Bank To suit requirement – tentatively - 110 kVA
5 Earth Pits To suit requirement – tentatively - 71 nos
6 Automatic Transfer Switch 2 nos
(ATS)
7 Contract Demand To suit requirement – tentatively - 500 kVA
8 Connected Load (Power) To suit requirement – tentatively - 410 kW
9 HT VCB 11 kV, 400 A
10 PMCC and MLDB 1 system
11 High mast 5 nos.
Table 2.7: Proposed fire fighting facilites
Fire water 3 X 2500 m3

storage
Fire water Diesel Driven Pumps of 3 * 700 KL/hr capacity
pumps
Jockey pumps Electric motor driven 2* 20m3/hr capacity
No of monitors Monitors and Hydrant points (alternate) in hydrant ring @ 30 m. Numbers
as per requirement

Hydrant points Monitors and Hydrant points (alternate)in hydrant ring @ 30 m. Numbers
as per requirement
Fire 10 kg DCP, 75 kg DCP, and CO2 fire extinguishers as per requirement
extinguishers given in OISD – 144
Hand Siren As per requirement mentioned in OISD -144
ETB As per requirement mentioned in OISD -144
MCP As per requirement mentioned in OISD -144
2.10 POWER REQUIREMENT
To suit requirement approx. 400 kVA from M/s. Central Electricity Supply Utility, Odisha
(CESU). During emergency DG sets will be used (1 x 700 kVA and 1 x 250 kVA). Also 100
KWp Hybrid Grid Type Solar Power shall be provided.
2.11 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT
Total Manpower Requirement of the project will be 80 (direct and indirect to include contract
labors and security personnel). In addition to that contract persons are also engaged for
maintenance of the Plant.
2.12 WATER AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
Total Water Requirement will be approx 15m3/day, which will be sourced through bore well
within the premises. The domestic sewage will be sent to Septic tank and soak pit .Water
balance is given in Table 2.8.
Table 2.8: Water Balance Table
Water Consumption Wastewater Generation & Disposal

Sl. Particulars Quantity Quantity Disposal Method
No (m3/day) (m3/day)
1 Domestic water 8 6.5 septic tanks and disposed off
requirement through soak pits
2 Industrial water 5 4 Waste is treated in ETP and
requirement used for gardening of green
(Cylinder washing) belt areas.
3 Gardening 2
Total 15 10.5
2.13 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
No industrial solid waste will be generated during the bottling process. Damaged cylinders will
be segregated & stored on site prior to disposal as scrap metal. Hazardous waste generated from
D.G set operation will be disposed to OSPCB Authorized Recyclers. Details of the solid and
hazardous generation with their category and its quantity, disposal system are mentioned in
Table 2.9 and Table 2.10.

Table 2.9: Non-Hazardous Waste
Description Quantity of Waste Generated
Total no. of employees (During operation phase)
Assuming per capita solid waste generation rate as 0.20 kg/capita/day
Quantity of solid waste generated 16
Organic solid waste : 60 % of the total waste 9.6
Inorganic solid waste: 40 % of the total waste 6.4
Disposal of domestic solid waste Disposed through municipal trucks.
Table 2.10: Hazardous waste

Schedule I
Sr. No. Qty (Per Month) Method of Disposal
Category No. Type
Solid (damaged ~ 100
1 Sold as scrap metal to dealers
cylinders, parts etc.) cylinders/month
To be disposed off as per
2 Sch. 5.1 – Used Oil 4 Litres
CPCB norms
2.14 LITIGATION PENDING AGAINST THE PROJECT
No litigation is pending against the project or the project proponent

Figure 2.4: Site Photograph

CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 GENERAL
This chapter provides the description of the existing environmental status of the study area with
reference to the environmental attributes like air, water, noise, soil, land use, ecology, socio
economics, etc. The study area covers 10 km radius around the project site. The existing
environmental setting is considered to adjudge the baseline conditions which are described with
respect to climate, atmospheric conditions, water quality, soil quality, ecology, socioeconomic
profile, land use and places of archaeological importance.
The present report incorporates the data monitored over a period of three months from November
2017 to January 2018. The primary baseline monitoring consists of meteorology, ambient air quality,
noise levels, water quality, soil quality and ecology (aquatic and terrestrial). The land use, geology,
demography, is November 2017 to January 2018 representing winter season, based on the secondary
data collected from various Government, semi-Government and public-sector organizations
3.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.2.1 Geomorphological Set up

Based on the physiographic set up, the district may be broadly divided in to four natural divisions
such as (a) Coastal sand dune (b) Alluvial plain, (c) Lateritic upland and (d) Hilly terrain.
The dunes having limited width occur along the Chilika coast discontinuously. These deposits are
fluvio aeoline in origin and are of longitudinal type.
Alluvial plain is the most potential hydrogeomorphic unit. It occurs as narrow strip along Chilika
coast in the south east & along the courses of major rivers. The Alluvial plain in the northeast is a
part of Mahanadi delta system.
The lateritic upland constitutes the major parts of the district. This forms an undulating terrain
covered with lateritic capping over Gondwana sand stone and Precambrian rocks.
.
3.2.2 Hydrogeology
Aquifer system of the area may be divided in to (a) fissured (b) porous types based on the
lithological characteristics of the area.
(a) Fissured Formation:
The Precambrian crystalline rocks which mainly consists of granite and granite gneiss, Khondalites,
Charnockites and Anothosites occupy major parts of the district covering western as well as central
and parts of eastern sector of the district. Ground water in these rock types occurs under unconfined
conditions within weathered residuum and under semi confined to confined conditions in fractures at
greater depths. The thickness of weathered residuum varies from negligible to 35/40m depending on
rock types. The thickness of the weathered zone is minimum in Charnockites and Anothosites while
the same is maximum in Khondalites. These weathered zones form shallow aquifer where ground
water occurs under unconfined conditions. The average yield of dug wells in granitic rocks is around

20 to 22 m3/day with the maximum around 36 to 40 m3/day. In other hard rocks the yield is
restricted within 25 m3/day with the average value around 12 to 15 m3
(b) Porous Formation:
The porous formation in the district are a) Semi-consolidated Athagarh formation of upper
Gondwana Group b) Quarternary alluvium and upper Tertiary sediments and also laterites and
lateritic gravels with limited extent with respect to time and space.
(i) Athagarh formation: This aquifer system occurs at shallow as well as deeper depths, are
mainly formed of sandstones. The shale form mainly pheratic aquifers and that also with limited
potential. The weathered zone extends down to 12 to 15m and top weathered part up to 5 to 6m is
lateritised. The yield of dug wells in the weathered zone is on an average is around 20 to 25
m3/day. The yield at deeper fractures is on an average 7 to 10 lps.
(ii)Quarternary Alluvium & Upper tertiary formations: This formation occurs in the extreme
northeast corner of the district covering Balianta and Balipatna blocks of the district. The ground
water occurs under pheratic condition at shallow depth and under semi -confined to confined
condition at deeper depths. The bedrocks occur at 119m depths at Bhingarpur of Balianta block
and at 198m depth at Balipatna and 230 m at Orakhand in the southern part of Balipatna block.
Quarternary alluvial deposits occur in minor pockets near Chilika lake area with limited thickness
and ground water is mostly saline barring few meters at top. The aquifer zones at deeper depth
generally occur within 100m depths. The Transmissivity values are generally high, more than
7000m2/day.
Laterites: Laterites occur as capping over consolidated and semiconsolidated formation and
prominent occurrences are found in Bolagarh, Khurda town, Bhubaneswar and Tangi area. The
average thickness is around 20m.
Figure 3.1: Hydrogeology Map of Khurda District

Depth Of Ground Water Level
The pheratic zone constitutes the most potential ground water reservoir in the district. This zone has
been mapped in course of hydro geological surveys. With a view to ascertain the changes in the
ground water regime and make an over all assessment of the ground water resources CGWB has, so
far, established 28 network hydrograph stations through out the district which are monitored
manually 4 times in a year, during January, April, August and November. The depth to water table
values depend on several factors like rainfall, topography, drainage characteristics, proximity to
drainage channels, lithology, water bearing and water yielding properties of the rocks.
The depth to water level in the hdrograph network stations of the district mostly ranges from 1.84 to
12.33m below ground level during premonsoon period. The water table is shallow in most part of the
district. The depth to water table contour map of both pre and post monsoon seasons are attached in
the brochures as Plate no3 & 4 respectively. The pre monsoon depth to water level in about 11.9% of
the wells fall in the range of 10 to 20 m & 52.9% of the wells fall in the range of 5 to 10m. About
23.5% of the wells 8 show depth to water level between 2 to 5 m and about 11.8% of the wells, less
than 2m.
3.2.3 Ground Water Resources

The principal source of recharge to ground water are rainfall, seepage from canals, return flow from
applied irrigation, seepage from tanks and ponds. Ground water exploitation for domestic use in the
district is mainly through private dug wells and hand pump fitted government bore wells. Data
pertaining to various parameters such as rainfall, water level fluctuation, specific yield, ground water
abstraction structures for various utilities, irrigation and other data recorded and / or collected by
CGWB, SE region and GWS & I, The total annual dynamic ground water resource of Khurda district
is assessed to be 90184 hectare metre. The annual utilizable ground water resource earmarked for
domestic and industrial use is 8542 hectare metre which is based on the projection of requirement by
the year 2025. The gross annual draft for all uses is 12464 hectare metre leaving a balance ground
water resource of 73914 hectare metre for further development for irrigation use.
Map showing depth to water level in pre-monsoon is shown in Figure 3.2and map showing depth to
water level in post-monsoon is shown in Figure 3.3

Figure 3.2: Map Showing Depth to Water Level in Pre-monsoon
Figure 3.3: Map Showing Depth to Water Level in Post-monsoon

Source: Ground Water Information Booklet of Khurda District

3.3. STUDY AREA INCLUDED IN ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The study area is considered to be area within a radius of 10 km of the Proposed IOCL Khordha LPG
Bottling Plant boundary. The EIA guidelines of the MoEF mandate the study area in this manner for
EIA‟s.
3.3.1. Land Use/Land Cover of the Study Area
Land Use/Land cover for 10 km radius from project location of Proposed LPG Bottling Plant of
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. at Khordha, Odisha. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.were delineated
based on the Landsat-ETM Data dated 25th May 2016; the land use/Land cover classes are
categorized based on the ground trothing and site visit. The land is classified in Agriculture, Builtup
Land,Fallow Land, Vegetation,Open Land, and Water body etc. classes detailed distribution of
units showing in the below map, table and presented in Table 3.1 and Figure 3.4.
Figure 3.4: Landuse/Landcover of 10 Km Study Area
Table 3.1: Landuse / Landcover Statistics of Area within 10 km Radius
SN Landuse/ Landcover Area in Sq. Area in %

Class Km.
1 Agriculture 148.71 47
2 Builtup Land 17.05 5
3 Fallow Land 67.61 22
4 Mining Area 8.06 3

SN Landuse/ Landcover Area in Sq. Area in %
Class Km.
5 Vegetation 71.69 23
6 Water 0.92 0
Total Area 314 100
It is defined as an area of human habitat developed due to non-agriculture use. The built-up land in
10 km radius from project site comprises of villages, towns, panchayat and revenue villages that
include buildings, Industries, factories, transport, communications, utilities in association with water
and vegetation. Out of total area, 17sq. Km area comes under built-up land class,this is 5 % of total
area. Khurdha, Palatotapada, Kuradhamalla, Dhaulimuhan, area is within study area.
 Vegetation:
The vegetation class use is a function of land productivity and land utilization practices over a period
of time. It is an area within the notified forest boundary bearing an association of predominantly of
trees and other vegetation types capable of producing timber and other forest produces. These lands
are generally occupying the topographically high regions. This land use/land cover class (Agriculture
Vegetation, forest vegetation area) in the study area coved 220.40 sq. km. area under Agriculture and
forest Vegetation class. This is 70% out of area.Most of area under agriculture land.
 Water Bodies
This category comprises areas with surface water, either impounded in the form of ponds, lakes,
Ocean and reservoirs or flowing as streams, rivers, canals etc. These are seen clearly on the satellite
image in blue to dark blue or cyan color depending on the depth of water. These areas were
identified and mapped as water bodies; this unit is spatiallydistributed in 0.9 sq. km area.
 Fallow Land and Mining Area:
Fallow land is a piece of land that is normally used for farming but that is left with no crops on it for
a season in order to let it recover its fertility is an example of land that would be described as fallow.
Out of total area 67.61sq. km area found under this class. This is 22 % of total area.Mining of stones
and metal activity found in central part of study area this area comprises 8 Sq. Km. which is 3% of
total area. The LULC classes are identified and presented in Figure 3.5

Figure 3.5: LULC Map

Figure 3.6: Drainage Map
Figure 3.7:Contour Map

3.4. METEOROLOGICAL DATA
During study, a continuous automatic weather monitoring station was established at site to record
wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity and temperature. Atmospheric pressure was recorded
twice a day at 08.30 and 17.30 hrs. Cumulative rainfall was monitored by rain gauge on daily basis.
This station was in operation in study period.
The methodology adopted for monitoring meteorological observations is as per the standard norms
laid down by Bureau of Indian Standards and the India Meteorological Department (IMD). Hourly
maximum, minimum and average values of wind speed, direction and temperature are recorded
continuously at site.
A fully instrumented continuous recording meteorological observatory is established and operated at

project site during study period The parameters are being monitored at site is given in Table 3.8
Table 3.2: Meteorological Monitoring At Site
S.N. Parameter Instrument Frequency

1 Wind Speed
Automatic Weather Continuous Automatic
2 Wind Direction station (Envirotech WM 251) 1 hourly Average
3 Ambient Temperature
4 Max. & Min Temperature Wet & Dry Bulb Thermometer Daily at 08:30 and 17:30 IST
5 Relative Humidity Hygrometer Daily at 08:30 and 17:30 IST

6 Rainfall Rain Gauge Daily
The aforesaid meteorological parameters were being observed in the field during monitoring period.
The analysis of the field observations is given in Table 3.3. The wind rose during the study period is
presented in Figure 3.6.
Table 3.3: Meteorological Data Recorded at Site
Relative Humidity, Wind Predominant

Temperature (°C)
Month % Speed, m/s wind direction
Min Max Min Max Mean
November
10.5 34.2 51 78 0.1
2017
December NE
17.5 32.3 55 76 0.1
2017
January 2018 10.2 26.4 48 78 0.1

Figure 3.8: Windrose for period November-2017 to January 2018

3.5. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
The ambient air quality monitoring was carried out at eight locations within the 10 km radius around
the site of project to know the existing background ambient air quality. The purpose of the estimation
of background pollutant concentration was to assess the impact of the project on the ambient air
quality within the region based on the activities of the project. The parameters chosen for assessment
of air quality were PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Hydrocarbon
(Methane and Non-methane HC) and VOCs. air quality monitoring was conducted as per revised
NAAQ standards 2009.
3.5.1. Methodology Adopted for the Study
PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Hydrocarbon (Methane and Non-
methane HC) and VOCs were the major pollutants associated with project. The baseline status of the
ambient air quality has been established through field monitoring data on PM10, PM2.5, Sulphur
dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Hydrocarbon (HC) Methane and Non-methane HC) and
VOCs at 8 locations within the study area. The locations for air quality monitoring were
scientifically selected based on the following considerations using climatological data.
 Meteorological conditions on synoptic scale;
 The methodology for conducting the baseline environmental survey and selection of
sampling locations in line with the guidelines given in the EIA manual of the MoEF&CC;
 Topography of the study area;
 Representatives of regional background air quality for obtaining baseline status; and
 Representatives of likely impact areas.
Ambient air quality monitoring was carried out on 24-hour basis with a frequency of twice a week at
a station during the study period for 8 locations.
3.5.2. Sampling and Analytical Techniques
Respirable Dust Samplers APM-451 of Envirotech instruments were used for monitoring Respirable
fraction (<10 microns) and gaseous pollutants like SO2, NOx, Methane and Non-methane (HC) and
VOCs. Table 3.6 shows the techniques for sampling and analysis for these parameters.

Table 3.4: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Technical Detectable
Parameters Technique
Protocol Limit
Respirable Dust Sampler
PM10 CPCB Guidelines 10.0 ug/m3
(Gravimetric method)
Fine Particulate Dust Sampler
PM2.5 CPCB Guidelines 2.5 ug/m3
(Gravimetric method)
Sulphur Dioxide West and Gaeke IS-5182 (Part-II) 5.0 ug/m3
Nitrogen Oxide Jacob & Hochheiser IS-5182 (Part-VI) 5.0 ug/m3
Hydrocarbon
Gas Chromatograph (FID
(Methane and Is-5182 (Part-XXI) 0.1 ppb
Detector)
Non-Methane)
Activated Charcoal method (GC
VOCs EPA TO-17 1 ug/m3
FID Detector)
Ambient air at the monitoring location is sucked through a cyclone. Coarse and non-respirable dust is
separated from the air stream by centrifugal forces acting on the solid particles and these particles
fall through the cyclone's conical hopper and get collected in the sampling cap placed at the bottom.
The fine dust (<10 microns) forming the PM10 passes the cyclone and is retained on the filter paper.
A tapping is provided on the suction side of the blower to provide suction for sampling air through a
set of impingers for containing absorbing solutions for SO2 and NOx. Samples of gases are drawn at
a flow rate of 0.2 liters per minute.
PM10 has been estimated by gravimetric method. Modified West and Gaeke method (IS-5182 part-II,
1969) has been adopted for estimation of SO2 and Jacobs-Hochheiser method (IS-5182 part-VI, 1975)
has been adopted for the estimation of NOx. Calibration charts have been prepared for all gaseous
pollutants.
The location of the monitoring stations with reference to the project site is given in Table 3.5. and
Figore3.9
Table 3.5: Ambient Air Monitoring Locations
Sl. No Location Location Distance w.r.t. Direction

Code Project site w.r.t. Project
(centre) (km site (centre)
1 A1 Project Site -
2 A2 Managobindapur 4.60 NW
3 A3 Jhinkijhari 4.5 SE
4 A4 Dhaulimuhan 4.6 SE
5 A5 Taratua 2.3 N
6 A6 Dalaiput 2.6 NE
7 A7 Madhapur 3.80 SW
8 A8 Dadhimachhagadia 1.6 S
The ambient air quality results are as summarised in Table 3.6. The detailed Ambient Air Quality
results are as referenced in Annexure IV.

Figure 3.9 (A): Map Showing Ambient Air Monitoring Locations

Table 3.6: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Results
PM10 (µg/m3)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 158.4 126.7 118.5 155.8 90.4 124.0 94.2 90.2
Max 255.8 268 264.6 210.4 114.3 160.0 111.5 106.3
98
239.3 265.3 260.6 210.2 110.9 157.3 110.9 104.8
Percentile
Standard 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
PM2.5 (µg/m3)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 52.3 70.7 72.1 61.5 39.7 53.5 41.0 40.0
Max 119.7 134.7 166.8 93.1 67.0 89.5 70.5 62.7
98
116.8 134.3 156.6 92.8 65.9 89.2 68.1 61.9
Percentile
Standard 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
SO2 (µg/m3)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 38.0 40.0 37.5 30.8 23.5 18.5 15.0 18.0
Max 51.0 62.0 54.0 40.2 36.0 33.0 24.0 29.0
98
49.8 62.0 53.3 40.1 35.08 32.77 24.0 28.54
Percentile
Standard 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
3
NOx (µg/m )
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min 52.5 52.0 51.9 45.6 42.0 39.0 33.0 37.0
Max 72.0 85.0 88.0 62.0 61.0 58.0 48.0 61.0
98
71.3 84.7 84.3 61.3 60.5 58.0 46.1 59.1
Percentile
Standard 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
3
Total VOC(µg/m )
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min
Max BDL
BDL (<1) BDL (<1) BDL (<1) BDL (<1) BDL (<1) BDL (<1) BDL (<1)
98 (<1)
Percentile
Non –Methane Hydrocarbon(µg/m3)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min
Max BDL
BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.1)
98 (<0.1)
Percentile
Methane(µg/m3)
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8
Min
Max BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
98 (<0.01) (<0.01) (<0.01) (<0.01) (<0.01) (<0.01) (<0.01) (<0.01)
Percentile
Note : All the values of VOC, Methane Hydrocarbon and Non-Methane Hydrocarbon are BDL(<0.01 µg/m3)

3.5.1. Observations
PM10: The maximum and minimum concentrations for PM10 were recorded as
268 g/m3 and 90.4 g/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at Jhinkijhari and
the minimum concentration was recorded at Taratua. Thus all the measured values are beyond
permissible limit set for Industrial areas (100 g/m3).This is becuse of stone washery in the vicinity
of the plant.
PM2.5: The maximum and minimum concentrations for PM2.5 were recorded as 166.8g/m3 and 39.75
g/m3 respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at Jhinkijhari and the minimum
concentration was recorded at Malipada. Thus all the measured values are beyond permissible limit
set for Industrial areas (60 g/m3).This is becuse of stone washery in the vicinity of the plant.
SO2: The maximum and minimum SO2 concentrations were recorded as 62g/m3 and 15 g/m3
respectively. The maximum concentration was recorded at Managobindapur & the minimum
concentration was recorded at Santarapur . Thus all the measured values are well below the limit set
for Industrial areas (80 g/m3).
NO2: The maximum and minimum NOx concentrations were recorded as 88 g/m3 and 33g/m3. The
maximum concentration was recorded at Jhinkijhari and the minimum concentration was recorded at
Santarapur.. Thus all the measured values are well below the limit set for Industrial areas (80 g/m3).
VOC: VOC values in all the locations were found to be less than detectable limit (<1 µg/m3).
Non-Methane Hydrocarbon: Non-Methane Hydrocarbon values in all the locations were found to be
less than detectable limit (<1 µg/m3).
3.6. NOISE ENVIRONMENT
Noise in general is sound, which is composed of many frequency components of various loudness
distributed over the audible frequency range. The most common and universally accepted scale is the A
weighted scale which is measured as dB (A). This is more suitable for audible range of 20 to 20,000 Hz
and has been designed to weigh various components of noise according to the response of a human
ear.The environmental assessment of noise from the industrial activity, construction activity and
vehicular traffic can be undertaken by taking into consideration various factors like potential damage to
hearing, physiological responses, and annoyance and general community responses.
3.6.1. Objective
The main objective of monitoring of ambient noise levels was to establish the baseline noise levels in
different zones. i.e. Residential, Industrial, Commercial and Silence zones, in the surrounding areas
and to assess the total noise level in the environment of the study area.
3.6.2. Methodology
 Identification of Sampling Locations
A preliminary reconnaissance survey was undertaken to identify the major noise sources in the area.
The sampling location in the area was identified considering location of industry, commercial
shopping complex activities, residential areas with various traffic activity and sensitive areas like

hospital, court, temple and schools also near the railway track for railway noise.
The noise monitoring was conducted at eight locations in the study area during monitoring period. 8
sampling locations were selected for the sampling of noise.
 Equivalent sound pressure level (Leq)
The sound from noise source often fluctuates widely during a given period of time. Leq is the
equivalent continuous sound level, which is equivalent to the same sound energy as the actual
fluctuating sound measured in the same time period.
 Instrument used for Monitoring
Noise levels were measured using an Integrating sound level meter manufactured by Cygnet (Model
No. 2031). It had an indicating mode of Lp and Leq. Keeping the mode in Lp for few minutes and
setting the corresponding range and the weighting network in “A” weighing set the sound level meter
was run for one hour time and Leq was measured at all locations.
There are different types of fields for measuring the ambient noise level, e categorized as free field,
near field and far field.
 Free Field
The free field is defined as a region where sound wave propagates without obstruction from source to
the receiver. In such case, the inverse square law can be applied so that the sound pressure level
decreases by 6dB (A) as the distance is doubled.
 Near Field
The near field is defined as that region close to the source where the inverse square law does not
apply. Usually this region is located within a few wavelengths from the source.
 Far Field
The far field is defined as that region which is at a distance of more than 1-meter from the source.
Table 3.7: Noise Level Monitoring Stations in the Study Area

Sl. No Location Location Distance w.r.t. Direction
Code Project site w.r.t. Project
(centre) (km site (centre)
1 N1 Project Site -
2 N2 Managobindapur 4.60 NW
3 N3 Jhinkijhari 4.5 SE
4 N4 Dhaulimuhan 4.6 SE
5 N5 Taratua 2.3 N
6 N6 Dalaiput 2.6 NE
7 N7 Madhabpur 3.80 SW
8 N8 Dadhimachhagadia 1.6 S

3.6.3. Method of Monitoring and Parameters Measured
Noise monitoring was carried out continuously for 24-hours with one hour interval. During each
hour parameters like L10, L50, L90 and Leq were directly computed by the instrument based on the
sound pressure levels. Monitoring was carried out at „A‟ weighting and in fast response mode.
The important parameters to be measured are Leq, Lday, and Lnight.
Leq: Latest noise monitoring equipments have the facility for measurement of Leq directly.
However, Leq can also be calculated using the following equation:
Leq (hrly) = L50 + (L10 - L90)2 / 60
Where,
L10 (Ten Percentile Exceeding Level) is the level of sound exceeding 10% of the total time of
measurement.
L50 (Fifty Percentile Exceeding Level) is the level of sound exceeding 50% of the total time of
measurement.
L90 (Ninety Percentile Exceeding Level) is the level of sound exceeding 90% of the total time of
measurement.
Lday : This represents Leq of daytime. Lday is calculated as Logarithmic average using the hourly
Leq‟s for day time hours from 6.00a.m to 10.00p.m
Lnight: This represents Leq of night time. Lnight is calculated as Logarithmic average using the
hourly Leq‟s for nighttime hours from 10.00p.m to 6.00a.m.
3.6.4. Noise Monitoring Results
The values of noise level parameters like Leq (day), and Leq (night), were monitored during study
period and are presented in Table 3.8.
Table 3.8: Ambient Noise Monitoring Results
SN Villages Code Leq (day) Leq (night)

1 Project Site N1 61 48
2 Managobindapur N2 61 49
3 Jhinkijhari N3 61 48
4 Dhaulimuhan N4 61 49
5 Taratua N5 63 53
6 Dalaiput N6 62 51
7 Madhabpur N7 61 48
8 Dadhimachhagadia N8 61 54

 Noise Standards
Ambient air quality standard in respect of noise have been stipulated by Govt. of India vide Gazette
notification dated. 14.2.2000. Table 3.9 describes ambient noise standards.
In Respect of Noise*
Table 3.9: Ambient Noise Standards
Limits in dB(A), Leq

Area Code Category of Area
** Day time #Night time
A Industrial Area 75 70
B Commercial Area 65 55
C Residential Area 55 45
D Silence Zone @ 50 40
* As per Environment protection act.

** Day Time: 6.00a.m to 10.00p.m.
# Night Time: 10.00p.m to 6.00a.m.
@ Silence zone is defined as an area upto 100 meters around such premises ashospitals, educational
institutions and courts. The silence zones are to be declared by the competent authority; Use of
horns, loudspeakers and bursting of crackers shall be banned in these zones.
The noise data compiled on noise levels is given in Table 3.8. Noise level of the project site varied
from 61 to 63 dB (A) in day time and from 48 to 54 dB (A) in the night time
3.7. WATER ENVIRONMENT

Selected water quality parameters of ground water and surface water resources within the study area
have been studied for assessing the hydrological environment to evaluate anticipated impact of the
proposed project. Understanding the water quality is essential in the preparation of Environmental
Impact Assessment. It also assists to identify critical issues in a view to suggest appropriate
mitigation measures for implementation to curb the deterioration of various hydrological sources in
the vicinity of the project.
The purpose of this study is to:
 Assess the water quality characteristics for critical parameters;

 Evaluate the impacts on agricultural productivity, habitat conditions, recreational resources
and aesthetics in the vicinity; and
 Predict the likely impacts on water quality due to the project and related activities.
3.7.1 Methodology
Two surface water and six ground water samples were examined for physic-chemical, heavy metals
and bacteriological parameters in order to assess the effect of industrial and other activities on
surface and ground water. The samples were analyzed as per the procedures specified in 'Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater' published by American Public Health

Association (APHA).Samples for chemical analysis were collected in polyethylene carboys. Samples
collected for metal content were acidified with 1 ml HNO3. Samples for bacteriological analysis
were collected in sterilized glass bottles. Selected physic-chemical and bacteriological parameters
have been analyzed for projecting the existing water quality status in the study area. Parameters like
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and pH were analyzed
3.7.2 Water Sampling Locations
Ground water sample was analyzed for various parameters to compare with the standards for
drinking water as per IS: 10500. The water sampling locations are listed below in Table-3.10
Table 3.10: Water Quality Sampling Locations
Station Code Location Distance (km) Direction

Ground Water
GW1 Project Site - -
GW2 Managobindapur 4.5 NW
GW3 Jhinkijhari 4.6 SE
GW4 Dhaulimuhan 5.6 SE
GW5 Dalak 5.6 SW
GW6 Dalaiput 2.6 NE
Surface Water
SW1 Near Project Site - -
SW2 Managobindapur 4.5 NE

Figure 3.9 ( B ) : Map Showing Water Sampling Location

3.7.3 Ground and Surface Water Quality Results
Four ground water and 2 surface water samples representing water environment have been considered around the existing plant within the
periphery of 10 km taking in to account the various uses. The results of ground water and surface water quality are presented in Table 3.11and
Table3.12Thephysico-chemical characteristics of Ground water are confirming to permissible limits of drinking water standards, prescribed in
IS: 10500 (Test Characteristics for Drinking Water) and suitable for consumption.
Table 3.11: Ground Water Characteristics

Sl. Parameters Unit IS 10500:2012
No Acceptable Permissible (GW1) (GW2) (GW3) (GW4) GW5) (GW6)
Limit Limit
1. Odour - Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable Agreeable
No 7.92 7.49 6.98
2. pH mg/l 6.5 -8.5 7.44 7.09 7.22
relaxation
Turbidity in 12.0 3.50 15.00
3. NTU 1 5 6.50 2.5 23.0
NTU
Total 346.0 178.0 680.00
4. Dissolved mg/l 500 2000 372.0 198.0 176
Solids
Total 118.44 75.00 325.24
5. Hardnessas mg/l 200 600 206.80 107.16 67.68
CaCO3
Calcium as 86.48 45.00 210.56
6. mg/l 75 200 109.04 62.04 41.36
Ca
Magnesium as 30.0 30.00 114.68
7. mg/l 30 100 97.76 45.12 6.40
Mg
8. Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 1000 51.47 13.10 14.04 33.69 40.0 215.25
Sulphate as 4.32 3.84 45.36
9. mg/l 200 400 34.32 1.20 3.96
SO4
Nitrate as No 0.24 0.41 0.55
10. mg/l 45 0.19 0.26 0.33
NO3 relaxation
11. Fluoride as F mg/l 1 1.5 0.82 0.77 0.69 0.78 0.70 0.65

Sl. Parameters Unit IS 10500:2012
No Acceptable Permissible (GW1) (GW2) (GW3) (GW4) GW5) (GW6)
Limit Limit
No 2.26 0.30 2.77
12. Iron as Fe mg/l 0.3 0.3 0.40 6.31
relaxation
No <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
13. Copper as Cu mg/l 0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
relaxation
No <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
14. Nickel as Ni mg/l 0.02 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
relaxation
0.30 0.19 0.29 0.31
15. Zinc as Zn mg/l 5 15 0.45 0.26
Mercury as No <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
16. mg/l 0.001 <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
Hg relaxation
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
17. Arsenic as As mg/l 0.01 0.05 <0.01 <0.01
No <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
18. Lead as Pb mg/l 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
relaxation
Cadmium as No <1.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
19. mg/l 0.003 <0.001 <0.001
Cd relaxation
Total MPN/100 <1.1 <1.1
20. - - <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1
Coliform ml
MPN/100 Absent Absent
21. E.coli - - Absent Absent Absent Absent
ml

Table 3.12: Surface Water Characteristics
Sl. Project Site Managobindapu

Chemical Test Parameter Unit
No. (SW1) (SW2)
1 pH Value -- 6.98 7.51

2 Total Suspended Solid (as TSS) mg/l 72.0 30.0
3 Total Dissolved Solid (as TDS) mg/l 69.0 40.0
4 Chemical OxygenDemand (as COD) mg/l 15.0 11.0
Bio-Chemical Oxygen Demand (as
5 mg/l 2.50 <2.0
BOD)
6 Conductivity at 25°C µS/cm 120.0 58.0
7 Dissolved Oxygen (as DO) mg/l 7.60 7.60
8 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 24.44 11.28
9 Calcium Hardness mg/l 15.04 7.52
10 Magnesium Hardness mg/l 9.40 3.76
11 Calcium (as Ca) mg/l 6.03 3.014
12 Magnesium (as Mg) mg/l 2.29 0.91
13 Total Alkalinity mg/l 29.25 20.47
-
14 Chlorde (as Cl ) mg/l 15.44 9.36
15 Sulphate (as SO4=) mg/l 3.12 2.88
16 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 0.55 0.42
17 Iron (as Fe) mg/l 2.56 0.64
18 Fluorides (as F) mg/l 0.25 0.30
19 Zinc (as Zn) mg/l 0.20 0.15
20 Arsenic (as As) mg/l <0.01 <0.01
21 Lead (as Pb) mg/l <0.01 <0.01
22 Cadmium (as Cd) mg/l <0.01 <0.01
23 Nickel (as Ni) mg/l <0.01 <0.01
24 Copper (as Cu) mg/l <0.01 <0.01
25 Total Chromium (as Cr) mg/l <0.01 <0.01
26 Phenolic Compounds as C6H5OH mg/l <0.05 <0.05
27 Mercury (as Hg) mg/l <0.001 <0.001
28 Fecal Coliform MPN/100ml 360 250

3.7.4 Observations
Ground Water Quality

 The analysis results indicate that the pH ranges in between 6.98 to 7.92, which is well
within the specified standard of 6.5 to 8.5
 Total hardness was observed to be ranging from 67.68 to 325.24 mg/l. The minimum
hardness (67.68 mg/l) was recorded at GW3 and the maximum (325.24 mg/l) was
recorded at GW6.
 Chlorides were found to be in the range of 13.1 to 215.25 mg/l, the minimum
concentration of chlorides (13.1 mg/l) was observed at GW2, whereas the maximum
value of 215.25 mg/l was observed at GW6.
 Sulphates were found to be in the range of 1.2 to 45.36 mg/l. The minimum value
observed at GW2 (1.2 mg/l) whereas the maximum value observed at GW6 (45.36 mg/l).
 The Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations were found to be ranging in between
176.0 to 680.0 mg/l, the minimum TDS observed at GW3 (176.0 mg/l) and maximum
concentration of TDS observed at GW6 (680.0 mg/l).
 Iron is found in between 0.30 to 6.31 mg/l and Zinc found in between 0.19 to 0.45 mg/l.
Surface Water Quality

 The analysis results indicate that the pH values in the range of 6.98 to 7.51
 DO was observed to be in the range of 7.4 to 7.6 mg/l.
 The TDS was observed in the range of 40.0 to 69.0 mg/l, the minimum TDS value was
observed at SW2, and where as maximum value was observed at SW1.
 The chlorides and Sulphates were found to be in the range of 9.36 to 15.44 mg/l and 2.88
to 3.12 mg/l, respectively.
 Total hardness expressed as CaCO3 ranges between 11.28 to 24.44 mg/l.
 The calcium & magnesium were found to be in the range of 3.01 to 6.03 mg/l and 0.91 to
2.29 mg/l, respectively. zinc is found in between 0.15 to 0.20 mg/l.
3.8. SOIL QUALITY

Soil is generally differentiated into two horizons of minerals and organic constituents of
variable depth, which differ from the parent material below in morphology, physical
properties, constituents, chemical properties, and composition and biological characteristics.
The physico- chemical characteristics of soil have been determined at 7 locations during the
monitoring period with respect to colour, texture, cation exchange capacity, pH, N, P, and K
etc. The sampling locations have been selected to represent the study area.
3.8.1. Selection of sampling Locations
The sampling locations have been identified with the following objectives:
 To determine the baseline soil characteristics of the study area;
 To determine the impact of existing plant on soil characteristics; and
 To determine the impact on soils more importantly from agricultural productivity point of
view.

Siven locations within 10 km radius around the project site were selected for soilsampling.
The details of the sampling locations are given in Table-3.13. The soil samples have been
analyzed for physic-chemicalparameters and heavy metals in accordance with the USEPA
and Soil.Science Society of America (SSSA) standard test methods. The analysis results ofall
the locations are presented in Table-3.14-A.The results are compared withstandard
classification given in Table-3.14B.
Table 3.13: Soil Sampling Stations in the Study Area
Code Locations Distance(km) Direction
S1 Project Site -- --
S2 Managobindapur 4.5 NE
S3 Jhinkijhari 4.5 SE
S4 Dhaulimuhan 6.4 SE
S5 Jagannathpur 7.0 NE
S6 Dalaiput 2.5 NE
S7 Babaja 8.2 E
3.8.2. Methodology
The soil samples were collected during monitoring period. The samples collected from the all
locations are homogeneous representative of each location. At random 7 sub locations were
identified at each location and soil was dug from 30 cm below the surface. It was uniformly
mixed before homogenizing the soil samples. The samples were filled in polythene bags,
labeled in the field with number and site name and sent to laboratory for analysis.
3.8.3. Soil Results
The detailed soil results of all the monitoring locations are as shown in Table 3.14(A).
Table 3.14(A): Chemical Characteristics of Soil in the Study Area

S. Parameters S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7
No.
1 pH 6.99 7.04 7.07 6.80 7.83 7.52 7.39
2 Electrical Conductivity at 84.0
16.0 35.0 88.0 120.0 28.0 54.0
25°C
3 Total Nitrogen (as N) 1.34 0.73 1.74 1.13 0.36 0.50 0.51
4 Calcium (as Ca) 1.15 1.36 2.71 1.70 1.35 0.91 1.45
5 Magnesium (as Mg) 0.506 0.52 0.75 1.0 0.47 0.18 0.57
6 Total Organic Carbon 2.59 3.16 7.08 6.04 2.01 2.50 2.48
7 Total Organic Matter 4.47 5.45 12.19 10.42 3.47 4.31 4.28
8 Water Soluble Chloride (as 0.18
0.20 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.19
Cl)
9 Total Phosphorus (as P) 0.17 0.35 0.82 0.61 0.20 0.43 0.26

S. Parameters S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7
No.
10 Total Soluble Sulfate (as 0.16
0.28 0.20 0.13 0.21 0.34 0.14
SO4)
11 Fluoride (as F) 14.0 18.0 19.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 14.0
12 Arsenic (as As) 3.0 2.1 1.90 1.50 1.20 0.90 1.0
13 Copper (as Cu) 11.0 48.0 38.0 37.0 41.0 36.0 24.0
14 Cadmium (as Cd) 5.0 9.0 19.0 16.0 23.0 19.0 18.0
15 Lead (as Pb) 15.0 30.0 28.0 38.0 27.0 22.0 21.0
16 Nickel (as Ni) 29.0 28.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 34.0 40.0
17 Zinc (as Zn) 38.0 62.0 88.0 96.0 71.0 66.0 98.0
18 Iron (as Fe) 119.0 121.0 28.4 25.30 50.20 100.50 80.20
19 Mercury (as Hg) 1.0 0.90 0.80 0.60 0.80 0.70 0.66
20 Cataion Exchange Capacity 18.0 16.0 33.0 29.0 17.0 19.0 17.0
21 Sodium (as Na) 0.75 1.40 1.20 1.30 1.0 1.25 0.95
22 Potassium (as K) 1.20 1.90 2.01 1.70 1.20 1.45 1.15
23 Moisture Content 3.50 3.80 4.0 3.90 4.10 4.30 4.35
24 Nitrate (as NO3) 16.0 15.0 12.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 14.0
25 Specific Gravity 2.51 2.58 2.35 2.60 2.55 2.53 2.58
Table 3.14(B):Standard Classification of Soil
S. No. Soil Test Classification

<4.5 Extremely acidic
4.51- 5.50 Very strongly acidic
5.51-6.0 moderately acidic
6.01-6.50 slightly acidic
1. pH 6.51-7.30 Neutral
7.31-7.80 slightly alkaline
7.81-8.50 moderately alkaline
8.51-9.0 strongly alkaline
9.01 very strongly alkaline
Upto 1.00 Average
Salinity Electrical Conductivity
1.01-2.00 harmful to germination
2 (mmhos/cm)
2.01-3.00 harmful to crops (sensitive to
(1 ppm = 640 mmho/cm)
salts)
Upto 0.2: very less
0.21-0.4: less
0.41-0.5 medium,
3 Organic Carbon
0.51-0.8: on an average sufficient
0.81-1.00: sufficient
>1.0 more than sufficient
Upto 50 very less
51-100 less
4 Nitrogen (Kg/ha) 101-150 good
151-300 Better
>300 sufficient

Source: Handbook of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi
Baseline Soil Status
 It has been observed that the pH of the soil in the study area varied from 6.80 to 7.83. The
maximum pH value of 7.83 was observed at S5where as theminimum value of 6.80 was
observed at S4.
 The electrical conductivity was observed to range from 16 to 88 mmhos/cm, with the
maximum observed at S3 with the minimum observed in S1.
 The nitrogen value varies from 0.36 to 1.74 kg/ha. The nitrogen content in thestudy area
falls in less to good category.
 The organic carbon value varies from 2.01 % to 7.08 %. The organic carboncontent in the
study area falls in minimum to sufficient category
3.9. ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Flora and fauna studies were conducted to assess the existing floral and faunal composition of
the area
3.9.1. Methodology Adopted for the Study
Assessment of the existing vegetation types in the core and buffer zones has been done using
standard procedures. The terrain of the impact zone is chiefly plain.
The Biodiversity studies were already carried out in the entire study area of 10 km radius.
The study of flora is conducted as per the guidelines of the Ministry of Environment and
Forests, Government of India, with respect to the scope and objectives. The study involved in
collection of primary data by conducting survey in the field, examination of floral and faunal
records in previously published reports and records, and analysis of the information in view
of the possible alteration in environment of the Propsed LPG Plant. For the survey of fauna
both direct and indirect observation methods were used
3.9.2. Flora in the Study Area
There are no sanctuaries in the 10 km radius of the study area. These forests are mainly
classed into tropical dry deciduous forest and tropical moist deciduous forest that are
outnumbered with rosewood, Haldi, Sal, Sagwan and Piasal trees, coconut trees.
The list of flora observed in the buffer zone is given in Table 3.15:
Table 3.15: List of Flora Observed In the Study Area
S.No. Botanical Name Local Name

1. Mangifera indica Mango,
2. Artocarpus heterofilus Kanthal
3. Annona reticulata Sitaphal
4. Borassus Flabellifer Tal

5. Phoenix sylvestris khejur
6. Emblica Officinalis Amla
7. Tamarindus indica Imli
8. Shorea robusta Sal
9. Tectona grandis Sagwan
10. Terminalia arjuna Arjun
11. Diospyros embryopteris Mankar Kendu
12. Magnolia champaca Champak
13. Secale cereale Rai
3.9.3. Fauna in the study area
The field studies are conducted to assess fauna in the study area. The list of animals present
in the study area are given in Table 3.16
Table 3.16: List of Fauna Observed in the Study Area
Sr. No Scientific Name Common Name

Mammals Herpestesed wardsii Mongoose
Mus rattus Indian Field Mouse
Birds Acridotherestristis Common Myna
Grus antigone Saras crane
Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret
Columba livianeglecta Blue Rock Pigeon
Corvussplendens House Crow
Dicrurusadsimillis Black Drongo
Nectariniaasioficabrevirostris Purple Sunbird
Saxicoloidesfulicata Indian Robin
Strebopeliadecaocto Ring Dove
Pycnonotus barbatus Bulbul
Eudanamusscoloopacea Koel
Amphibians Rana hexadactyla Common Indian toad
Rana tigrina Frog
Ptyasmucosus Rat snake
Reptiles Naja naja Indian cobra

3.10. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
Study of socio-economic profile around the proposed project site has been carried out based
on “Census of India 2011. Therefore, the Socio-economic profile has been mostly based on
Census of India 2011. Moreover, a site visit was also conducted by Ultra Tech team of
engineers, scientist and sociologist to collect some primary data. The study encompasses
population, civic and other amenities, occupational structure, land use pattern etc.
The project site area measures only 32 Acres. The immediate surroundings of the plant site
are basically rural in nature. The study area for Socio-economic Environment has been
considered to be an area covered within a radius of 10 km around the proposed project site.
Figure 3.10; Villages within 10 Km. Radius Area from Project Site.

Table3.17: List of Villages within 10 Km. Radius Area from Project Site and Demographic details
Total Pop. SC Pop. ST Population Literate Pop. Illiterate Pop.

Main Marginal Non-
Sr. Househ 0-6 Age Working
Name of Area Working Working Working
No. olds Males Female Group Males Female Males Female Males Female Males Female Pop.
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
1 Nayakot 26 81 62 22 0 0 0 0 50 35 31 27 45 41 4 98
2 Gayabandha 226 608 574 127 13 17 0 0 486 389 122 185 352 352 0 830
Kuanrakalipata
3 100 298 278 61 20 16 0 0 248 195 50 83 174 167 7 402
na
4 Damanbhuin 414 1174 1150 273 19 18 93 115 867 772 307 378 691 577 114 1633
5 Khajuria 36 97 99 36 1 0 0 0 75 69 22 30 52 52 0 144
6 Lehanga 153 334 304 63 0 0 0 0 275 242 59 62 199 131 68 439
Hemantapur
7 4 10 8 1 0 0 0 0 8 6 2 2 4 4 0 14
patna
8 Dakhineswar 406 873 847 173 145 126 143 146 677 541 196 306 599 445 154 1121
9 Thanapalli 67 139 132 43 1 0 138 131 90 56 49 76 177 176 1 94
10 Goda 332 888 847 169 2 2 100 87 713 631 175 216 574 379 195 1161
11 Santarapur 170 426 429 93 84 74 59 59 331 279 95 150 312 284 28 543
12 Dangarapada 170 418 387 72 0 0 0 0 358 312 60 75 258 109 149 547
13 Deuli 244 551 507 132 6 5 142 131 431 307 120 200 397 258 139 661
14 Brahmapura 190 424 432 93 42 35 0 0 339 288 85 144 252 121 131 604
Brahmapurapat
15 96 204 212 47 32 44 0 0 169 156 35 56 116 116 0 300
na
16 Gopalpur 100 248 258 55 51 52 0 0 200 186 48 72 133 128 5 373
17 Gobindapur 121 286 283 47 0 0 0 0 241 213 45 70 157 101 56 412
18 Lokipur 187 454 440 108 4 2 91 100 368 319 86 121 250 142 108 644
19 Kalikaprasad 3 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 2 3 3 0 8
20 Parichhal 333 786 696 157 3 2 215 203 639 484 147 212 564 330 234 918
21 Dalak 180 517 469 88 0 0 0 0 444 349 73 120 319 244 75 667

Main Marginal Non-
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
22 Sarua 325 1132 757 183 139 127 105 82 962 536 170 221 814 601 213 1075
23 Botalama 169 423 379 95 0 0 71 67 354 270 69 109 287 236 51 515
24 Balipatana 69 172 175 36 0 0 0 0 150 156 22 19 98 80 18 249
25 Patnibalipatana 104 224 231 63 70 78 43 44 192 183 32 48 253 221 32 202
26 Barapada 179 416 380 52 0 0 0 0 377 337 39 43 317 283 34 479
27 Pattimal 50 125 120 21 0 0 0 0 112 103 13 17 88 86 2 157
28 Sriramapur 62 157 147 47 4 3 71 68 87 65 70 82 74 72 2 230
29 Chhania 207 530 505 135 21 21 101 101 415 334 115 171 308 277 31 727
30 Karadagadia 344 821 781 206 9 6 0 2 660 566 161 215 715 555 160 887
31 Kesarada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 Sikharada 11 24 18 5 0 0 0 0 19 16 5 2 18 13 5 24
33 Godisahi 101 251 213 47 22 20 0 0 218 170 33 43 154 149 5 310
34 Godi 98 249 219 53 41 32 0 0 203 146 46 73 142 139 3 326
35 Masania 13 47 48 10 18 13 0 0 41 37 6 11 31 17 14 64
36 Phulachhachuni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ramasingprasa
37 105 228 220 44 0 0 0 0 200 169 28 51 129 113 16 319
d
38 Gokulapur 141 365 349 86 42 41 62 61 323 276 42 73 215 189 26 499
Managobindapu
39 204 503 518 118 236 235 46 67 372 320 131 198 373 185 188 648
r
Jagannathpurpat
40 82 219 200 44 4 5 0 0 174 159 45 41 149 59 90 270
na
Lalitadeipurpata
41 131 301 285 47 125 128 0 0 261 216 40 69 177 94 83 409
na
Nilakanthapurp
42 33 84 77 19 0 0 0 0 72 62 12 15 47 44 3 114
atna
43 Narasinghpur 136 309 321 84 109 110 1 0 227 208 82 113 220 182 38 410

Main Marginal Non-
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
44 Chandi 50 114 114 24 78 73 0 0 94 81 20 33 59 59 0 169

45 Kokasingh 137 309 298 55 74 71 0 0 273 237 36 61 154 110 44 453
46 Kunjuri 193 494 438 95 51 50 105 103 410 328 84 110 285 258 27 647
Kunjabeharipat
47 118 321 293 61 9 11 0 0 275 219 46 74 208 187 21 406
na
48 Nianmunha 256 593 543 100 5 5 124 121 496 396 97 147 290 256 34 846
49 Dalatola 91 214 201 64 0 0 0 0 174 155 40 46 142 96 46 273
50 Bengitangi 196 470 418 83 25 22 86 63 367 271 103 147 321 141 180 567
51 mangarajpur 78 195 164 42 0 0 64 55 159 108 36 56 106 0 106 253
52 Khordha 877 2326 2186 532 109 109 110 108 1868 1521 458 665 1333 1017 316 3179
53 Basanta 299 681 640 153 49 42 0 0 569 466 112 174 426 376 50 895
54 Haladiapada 36 82 72 22 0 0 59 58 62 38 20 34 75 3 72 79
55 Tangiapada 248 570 561 126 95 91 182 195 425 305 145 256 447 226 221 684
56 Paikatigiria 387 993 1013 229 212 210 133 226 815 681 178 332 700 410 290 1306
57 Chandapur 113 259 271 56 0 0 83 91 188 161 71 110 192 105 87 338
58 Pubusahi 199 541 509 114 7 7 0 0 461 391 80 118 326 135 191 724
59 Kapileswarpur 176 490 454 96 51 60 64 65 376 287 114 167 333 207 126 611
60 Olasingh 61 137 140 40 10 10 6 10 106 106 31 34 83 74 9 194
61 Jayamangala 146 345 325 51 0 0 19 16 279 227 66 98 217 162 55 453
62 Sananuagan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
63 Raghunathapur 52 142 147 37 4 4 0 0 113 120 29 27 91 91 0 198
Gopapuriapatpu
64 141 295 286 55 0 0 0 0 252 208 43 78 174 61 113 407
r
NalipadaArjunp
65 345 755 738 189 125 126 215 228 535 398 220 340 537 384 153 956
ur
66 Barabhujia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Main Marginal Non-
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
67 Taratua 628 1689 1610 351 300 281 125 121 1275 1016 414 594 1164 700 464 2135
68 Wilkisannagar 236 652 589 126 73 48 0 0 557 474 95 115 397 338 59 844
69 Panabaraj 301 852 779 151 45 48 130 116 758 628 94 151 505 462 43 1126
70 Palla 569 1493 1354 271 14 14 79 77 1290 1064 203 290 932 834 98 1915
71 Rasulpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 Saradhapur 504 1295 1205 326 0 0 201 168 978 785 317 420 835 351 484 1665
73 Jakara 27 85 77 10 0 0 0 0 77 64 8 13 44 42 2 118
74 Kalyanpur 39 96 96 18 0 0 0 0 84 75 12 21 44 44 0 148
75 Beruhan 140 345 368 98 27 30 146 163 254 205 91 163 201 81 120 512
76 Chhotarapur 111 315 311 57 24 30 0 0 263 226 52 85 178 140 38 448
77 Jariput 255 654 624 127 80 70 77 82 526 442 128 182 392 149 243 886
78 Bangida 112 277 275 43 7 5 0 0 249 238 28 37 190 176 14 362
79 Radhakantapur 118 275 301 60 20 17 114 109 188 170 87 131 228 220 8 348
80 Adakhandia 188 420 430 93 115 114 52 60 321 297 99 133 307 252 55 543
81 Madhapur 97 302 283 71 0 0 0 0 257 211 45 72 202 201 1 383
82 Bhatapada 140 402 401 80 0 0 0 0 316 270 86 131 215 161 54 588
83 Kankadahad 88 193 203 46 76 87 0 0 132 121 61 82 122 21 101 274
84 mangalpur 109 280 276 54 14 17 56 61 240 229 40 47 210 51 159 346
85 Saanta 150 342 324 59 66 67 1 0 280 245 62 79 207 176 31 459
86 Dalaiput 272 726 679 177 86 84 0 0 598 487 128 192 465 445 20 940
87 Sialiapatna 176 416 400 81 0 0 46 58 355 279 61 121 339 122 217 477
88 Berhampura 114 255 257 73 0 0 150 163 167 128 88 129 168 100 68 344
89 Baniatangi 449 1121 1070 254 341 342 0 0 914 757 207 313 871 676 195 1320
90 Nausingh 19 49 59 13 0 0 0 0 42 47 7 12 30 28 2 78
91 Kadalibari 94 247 266 42 9 11 88 87 197 183 50 83 173 153 20 340

Main Marginal Non-
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
92 Pallakothabad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
93 Kuradhamal 280 786 710 151 94 81 75 80 622 499 164 211 477 371 106 1019
94 Somanathapur 123 319 291 63 39 29 0 0 251 214 68 77 350 201 149 260
Dadhimachhaga
95 388 947 868 234 66 62 342 329 667 546 280 322 727 681 46 1088
dia
96 Chhatrama 99 255 239 51 0 0 0 0 221 189 34 50 172 144 28 322
97 Bajapur 822 2060 1992 445 128 127 278 314 1668 1340 392 652 1535 1189 346 2517
98 Nandapur 249 640 626 126 208 205 0 0 553 489 87 137 376 341 35 890
99 Chhatipur 280 764 726 159 58 60 72 75 631 512 133 214 503 413 90 987
100 Keranda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
101 Mahatapalla 77 193 172 25 0 0 21 21 156 131 37 41 126 120 6 239
102 Durgapur 118 363 308 75 72 54 0 0 291 237 72 71 214 128 86 457
103 Jhinkijhari 275 695 708 188 168 154 120 132 525 452 170 256 571 458 113 832
Nijigarh
104 425 1179 1200 277 151 167 313 292 915 806 264 394 811 578 233 1568
Tapanga
Narasinghapras
105 141 314 311 83 0 1 120 119 224 188 90 123 217 117 100 408
ad
106 Dhaulimunha 550 1567 1491 357 468 460 0 0 1256 1039 311 452 1227 828 399 1831
107 Gopinathapur 188 538 498 133 237 209 0 0 437 334 101 164 429 346 83 607
108 Brajamohanpur 246 630 665 165 50 63 0 0 495 480 135 185 357 342 15 938
109 Ramachandi 80 216 216 31 43 45 0 0 191 184 25 32 108 100 8 324
110 Durgaprasad 216 609 594 145 107 113 0 0 474 378 135 216 392 279 113 811
111 Grameswarpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
112 Sadheigarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
113 Haripur 206 603 519 117 0 0 0 0 489 358 114 161 331 174 157 791
114 Banamalipur 103 249 240 61 11 14 0 0 209 170 40 70 150 34 116 339

Main Marginal Non-
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
115 Raipur 123 299 296 63 14 16 0 0 257 229 42 67 160 147 13 435
116 Basanta 148 371 355 90 50 44 0 0 315 272 56 83 214 116 98 512
117 Anda 120 270 263 56 13 13 0 0 239 202 31 61 149 75 74 384
118 Jagannathpur 222 610 552 117 183 177 0 0 519 409 91 143 476 347 129 686
119 Kiajhari 36 75 93 18 13 17 8 10 58 69 17 24 90 61 29 78
120 Malipada 13 37 35 6 3 3 0 0 30 24 7 11 42 27 15 30
121 Lahanga 209 602 571 143 49 37 0 0 449 346 153 225 322 305 17 851
122 Godipada 146 378 374 99 40 43 0 0 299 258 79 116 208 169 39 544
123 Kanpur 888 2330 2294 533 471 482 7 4 1690 1431 640 863 1351 1044 307 3273
124 Champajhar 248 643 602 137 15 9 0 0 503 413 140 189 357 295 62 888
125 Panichhatra 185 454 453 93 29 26 0 0 347 296 107 157 294 263 31 613
126 Naranagarh 586 1346 1304 257 316 314 20 19 1001 813 345 491 803 600 203 1847
127 Bhagabanpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
128 Kanchilo 63 173 163 28 35 36 0 0 155 134 18 29 105 103 2 231
129 Mota 441 1084 1002 216 7 10 110 110 877 679 207 323 627 451 176 1459
130 Kalibati 5 7 5 1 1 1 0 0 6 5 1 0 5 5 0 7
131 Kaipadar (CT) 877 2326 2186 532 109 109 110 108 1868 1521 458 665 1333 1017 316 3179
132 Kholadwar 220 575 579 126 51 53 0 0 490 413 85 166 382 360 22 772
133 Kansapada 125 259 231 63 173 154 0 0 197 137 62 94 183 139 44 307
134 Podapada 246 533 504 136 13 14 182 185 398 300 135 204 381 258 123 656
135 Haridamada 140 355 351 104 16 16 58 68 263 212 92 139 233 203 30 473
136 Taraboi 516 1191 1164 297 124 109 0 0 967 852 224 312 891 579 312 1464
137 Manipur 60 140 147 29 0 0 0 0 113 105 27 42 65 61 4 222
138 Babaja 212 599 526 127 0 0 0 0 491 406 108 120 348 343 5 777
139 Koranga 225 512 505 104 92 85 0 0 436 391 76 114 243 154 89 774

Main Marginal Non-
Pop. Pop. Pop.
Pop.
140 Aragul 433 1114 956 246 219 221 184 142 905 620 209 336 693 475 218 1377
141 Deulabasta 250 602 548 100 42 31 44 41 538 456 64 92 334 319 15 816
142 Samapur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
143 Benapanjari 718 1787 1831 442 50 55 0 0 1442 1310 345 521 930 822 108 2688
144 Trimal 697 1971 1891 402 408 425 4 4 1630 1371 341 520 1230 985 245 2632
145 Bijipur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.10.1 Male And Female Population
While dealing study area (10 Km radius from project site) as per secondary data (Population Census 2011) the total population is 140645.
There are 28276 households in the study area and the average size of household is 5 members per household in the study area. The dependent
population below 6 years is 15612 (11.10% of the total population) in the study area. The sex ratio of the study area is 951 females per 1000
males. The sex ratio of the study area is poor, as compare to district sex ration of khordha it is higher.
 Male - Female Ratio is: 1000 Male: 951 Female
 Population Density in study area is: 447 per Sq. Km. (Population Density = Number of People/Land Area)

Figure 3.11: Male-Female Population Distribution Chart
3.10.2 Religion:
Hindus contribute 91% of the total population and are the largest religious community in the
city followed by Muslims which contribute 7% of the total population and Christians are the
third largest religious community here with 2% population.
Figure 3.12 : Religion distribution of khordha

People of different religion worship their religious beliefs in Churches, Masjids, Gurudwaras,
Jain temples and other religious places that is located in the study area. Oriya is the official
and widely spoken language in study area.
Lord Gopinath Temple, Maa Bauti Temple, Gopinath Temple, Baba Somanatha Temple, Maa
Baghei Temple, Darukhetra Sri Jagannata Temple, Shree Jagannath Temple, Maa Jogamaya
Temple, Hanuman Temple, Sri Gopinath Temple, Bajpur, Baba Bukhari Peer and many
temples, mosques, church gurudwaras are part of cultural heritage of study area.

Figure 3.13: Baba Bukhari Peer majjid
3.10.3 SC and ST Population
According to the 2011 census, the ratio of scheduled caste population in the study area to the
total population is 11.1% which is high as compared to the SC population in the district
which is 13.21%. whereas the scheduled tribe population in the study area to the total
population is 8.7% which is high as compared to the ST population of the district which is
5.11%. Together they constitute only 19.8% of total population of the study area within 10
km radius. This can be observed in figure 3.14.
Figure3.14: SC and ST Population Distribution

3.10.4 Educational Status
In the study area the average literacy rate is 75%, whereas out of total literate population the
male literacy is 55% and female literacy is 45% in the study area. The average literacy rate
(77.72%) of the district is high as compared to the literacy rate of study area, The female
literacy rate is low in the study area, which is a pan India phenomena. The education status
has been mentioned in the figure 3.15.
Following schools and colleges are in study area;
Colleges:-
 Prananath Autonomous College, Khordha
 Women's Degree College, Khordha
 Giet Engineeringh Khordha
 D.I.T.E College Khordha
 KMBB Engineering College Khordha
 AMIT College Khordha
 Hi-tech College Khordha
 Sri Jaganatha College Kaipadar Khordha
Schools:-
 DAV Public School, Khordha
 SDA Higher Secondary School, Khordha
 Carmel English Medium School, Khordha
 Dalatola High School, Dalatola, Khurdha
 B.J.B High School Khordha
 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Khordha
 St.Xavier High School Khordha
 Gurujang High School Khordha
Figure 3.15: Literates and Illiterate Population

3.10.5 Occupational Structure
In occupational structure, the total population is divided into total workers and non-workers.
Total Workers can be classified into two types, viz. main workers and marginal workers. The
work participation rate for total workers is defined as percentage of total workers to total
population. The occupational structure signifies the total no. of workers and non-workers and
types of workers in the area. The occupational scenario reflects the economic condition of the
study area.
While dealing study area 10 km radius from project site as per Census of India 2011 within
study area total working population is 33.2% and non-working population is 66.8 % out of
working population almost 74.1 % peoples are in main working population category. And
25.9% Population is in marginal population category.
The relative importance of the main spheres of economic activity is the gauged from the
pattern of distribution of total workers according to broad fourfold classification namely,
cultivators, agricultural labour, household industry workers and other economic activities. In
the study area, cultivators (20%) and agricultural labour (16.6%) together constitute 36.6% of
the total workers as shown in following figure. It reflects that agricultural sector has absorbed
most of the workers in the study area. The proportion of workers in other economic
categories is also 59% of the total workers shows that they are engaged in manufacturing,
processing, servicing and repairs, trade and commerce etc. type of activities although the area
is rural in nature.
Non-working population is study area is 93967 which are 66.8 % out of total population. This
category includes below 15 years age population and not willing to any work is considered.
Also after Retirement age population also include in this category.
Figure 3.16: Distribution of working population

3.10.6 Health Care Facilities
While dealing with 10 km radius from project site there is many hospitals are available like
Sahajog Hospital, Arogya Hospital, Om Suvam Hospital, Arogya Hospital, Parkland
Hospital, Khordha Hospital, Eye Hospital, C.J.M. Hospital, Jena Mani Hospital, Khurda,
Jeevan Jyoti Hospital, Nature Tech Hospital, Nandighosha Hospital, South City Hospital, Sai

Sanjibani Hospital, Maa Tarini Nursing Home, Taraboi Hospital, New Life Drug Deaddiction
and Research Centre.
3.10.7 Infrastructure, Transport and Communication
The study area consists of 145 villages within the 10 km radius area. The area consists of
rural population and is not very close to urban areas, but is not that much backward in terms
of infrastructure facilities like schools, healthcare facility, water supply, roads, markets,
banks, post offices, electrification etc. Some facilities are available in the villages and some
of these facilities are available in khordha area.
The project site is well connected by road through NH-5 and by rail network. The project site
is located at plot no701, 703,704, 706, 707(P) & 708 (P), at Somanathpur of Khordha district
in the state of Odisha. The project site is 18 km away from Khurda road Railway station on
South Eastern Railway line between Howrah & Chennai. Biju Patnaik International Airport at
Bhubaneswar is located at a distance of 35 km
3.11. TRAFFIC STUDY ASSESSMENT
The traffic studies have been conducted to know the prevailing traffic volumes on the roads
near the project site. It is essential to consider these details for assessing the anticipated future
traffic volumes as a part of overall impacts assessment for the project. The variations of
traffic densities depend upon the working days and time and also vary in day and night times.
In order to assess the prevailing traffic volumes on the roads, the survey was conducted
during normal working day of the week by avoiding local holidays or abnormal situations to
reflect the true picture of the traffic densities. The traffic study was conducted at one location
for 24 hours
The Traffic density was monitored at Kaipadar Road near Somanathpu
The data were recorded once for a day at the location in the month of January 2018, for
continuous 24 hours in a day, under three different vehicle categories i.e., Heavy, Medium
and Light. The heavy vehicles included trucks, buses, cranes etc. The medium vehicles
included mini buses; matadors etc. while cars, jeeps, two wheelers and auto rickshaws were
considered under the light vehicles category.

Figure 3.17: Traffic Study Location
Table-3.18: Name Of The Location: Near Noonmati Bus Stop

Date Of Sampling: 02.01.2018
Hour Type of Vehicles Total

Heavy Medium Light Two
Wheelers
0700 - 0800 5 18 165 150 338
0800 - 0900 10 22 145 210 387
0900 - 1000 15 58 115 205 393
1000 - 1100 12 61 85 188 346
1100 - 1200 10 75 80 170 335
1200 - 1300 7 80 81 140 308
1300 - 1400 5 85 71 146 307
1400 - 1500 7 72 78 120 277
1500 - 1600 5 67 85 115 272
1600 - 1700 8 80 86 135 309
1700 - 1800 9 60 105 120 294
1800 - 1900 7 35 103 110 255
1900 - 2000 6 42 72 75 195
2000 - 2100 4 38 65 62 169
2100 - 2200 2 30 62 54 148
2200 - 2300 1 20 42 40 103
2300 - 0000 0 15 22 25 62
0000 - 0100 0 11 15 15 41
0100 - 0200 0 8 10 2 20
0200 - 0300 0 7 8 1 16

Hour Type of Vehicles Total
Heavy Medium Light Two
Wheelers
0300 - 0400 1 10 11 5 27
0400 - 0500 5 17 18 9 49
0500 - 0600 7 21 25 7 60
0600 - 0700 5 22 55 46 128
Total 131 954 1604 2150 4839
NOTE :
Heavy : Truck, Bus, Cranes,
Medium : Minibus, Matador, Minidor,
Light : Car, Jeep, Auto Rickshaw
Table-3.19:Traffic Survey of Lean & Peak Hrs
During Lean During Peak During Peak

Hrs. (No. of During Lean Hrs. Hrs. (No. of Hrs. Vehicles
SN Vehicle Type vehicles/hr) Vehicles in PCU’s vehicles/hr) in PCU’s
Two Wheelers 58 44 142 107
1
2 Light 50 100 95 190
3 Medium 32 64 52 104
4 Heavy 4 15 9 33
Total 144 223 298 434
Table 3.20.: PCU Factors on Urban Roads
Passenger Car Equivalency (PCE)

Types of Vehicles
Motor Cycle or Scooter (2-Wheeled) 0.75
Passenger Car, Pick-up van 1
Auto-rickshaw (3-Wheeled) 2.0
Light Commercial Vehicle 2.0
Truck or Bus 3.7
Bicycle 0.5
Existing Traffic Scenario & Level of Service
Capacity of road as per IRC = 2400 PCU‟s/hr
Total Volume in PCUs during Peak Hours = 434
Existing Volume/Capacity ratio = 434/2400= 0.22

The level of service is “A” that is EXCELLENT.
Table 3.21: Level of Service
Level of Services
Sl. No. Existing Volume/Capacity
1 0.0 to 0.2 “A” (Excellent)
2 0.2 to 0.4 “B” (Very Good)
3 0.4 to 0.6 “C” (Good)
4 0.6 to 0.8 “D” (Fair)
5 0.8 to 1.0 “E” (Poor)
After implementation the project an addition of ~ 200 trips per day (i.e. 100 trucks per day)
tank trucks is envisaged. To understand that impact due this addition the following modified
scenarios on the access roads is discussed. The Node I is shown in the figure.
3.12.1 Modified Traffic Scenario & Level of Service
100 additional trucks i.e. 200 trips assume to enter and exit during peak hrs for the proposed
project (worst case scenario).
Node I: ~100 trucks of 200 additional volume in PCU will be 3.7x200/9 = 82 per hour during
peak hours.
Traffic Flow at Node I
Total volume during peak hours in PCUs after completion of the project (V) = 434 +82
= 563
Capacity of Road as per IRC (C) = 2400 PCU‟s/hr
Modified Existing Volume/Capacity ratio will be (V/C) = 516/2400 = 0.22. The level of
service of the road will be “B” after the proposed project that is “VERY GOOD”.
The above results indicated that the post project scenarios will contribute to addition in
existing traffic, the level of service will continue to be GOOD. Traffic will continue to run
smoothly without congestion and no widening of road is anticipated

CHAPTER 4 - ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
4.1. INTRODUCTION
Identification of impacts and mitigation measures of the same in Environmental Impact

Assessment study helps in quantification and evaluation of impacts. During baseline study
several impacts can be identified but it is necessary to identify the critical impacts both
positive and negative on various components of the environment that are likely due to
installation of LPG mounded bullets.
The environmental impacts can be categorized as either primary or secondary. Primary

impacts are the ones that are caused directly due to the project activity on environmental
attributes, whereas secondary impacts are indirectly induced.
The construction and operational phase of the project activity comprises various activities,
each of which may have either positive or negative impact on some or other environmental
attributes. The proposed project activities would impart impact on the environment in two
distinct phases:
 During construction phase - Temporary or short term impact
 During operation phase - May have long term impact
4.2. IMPACT ASSESSMENT
4.2.1. During Construction Phase
Impact on topography
For preparation of site for installation of proposed mounded bullets and other facilities, soil
from the proposed site will be excavated. The excavated loose soil will be utilized for
packing and mulching the mounded bullets and for levelling of low lying areas inside the
plant. Thus, no impact on topography during construction phase is envisaged
 Identified Impacts on Land/Soil Environment
During site preparation, excavation will be done at places in the project site where sheds,
Mounded Storage bullets and the approach road will be constructed. This is required to
provide solid base/foundations for structures & roads.
 Improper disposal of the excavated earth during installation of storage

vessals/structures may result into temporary loss of topsoil productivity of that
particular area.
 Storage of construction material/chemicals (if any) if not done at designated place
can cause nuisance and hazards

 Accidental spillage of Hazardous chemicals/oil during handling may lead to soil
contamination
 Improper segregation and disposal of solid waste generated during construction phase by
workers working at site
 Filth generation if dry waste/garbage generated during construction period is not handled
efficiently.
 Identified Impacts on Air Environment
Emission of air pollutants during construction period will include fugitive dust due to
excavation of soil, movement of heavy construction equipments/ vehicles, site clearing and
other activities. This type of emission is expected to result in change in the baseline air
quality specifically during the construction phase. However, the construction activities will
be for temporary period and hence, its impact on the existing ambient air quality as well as
vegetation will be reversible. Further, dust emissions will be confined within the limited area.
.
 Identified Impacts on Noise Environment
The source of noise is due to operation of heavy machines, movement of heavy vehicles. The
noise generation during construction phase may have some impact on the existing ambient
noise levels. The major activities associated with installation/ construction activities would be
carried out during day time. The construction equipment may result in high noise levels,
which may affect the personnel in the work zone. However, use of personal protective
equipments such as earplugs, ear muffs will mitigate any adverse impact of the noise on
working personnel.
The noise likely to be generated during excavation of earth, loading/unloading and

transportation of construction materials etc will be in the range of about 80 to 90 dB(A) and
this will occur only when all the equipments operate simultaneously. There is a remote
possibility of such occurrence. The workers engaged in construction activities, in general, are
likely to be exposed to an equivalent noise level of 70-75 dB(A). Therefore, use of protective
equipments in the form of ear muffs/ earplugs in high noise level areas shall mitigate any
adverse impact
 Identified Impacts on Water Environment

 Increased water demand during construction phase for site preparation, dust spraying,
construction activities, curing, domestic and other water requirements for labour and staff
onsite
 Increase in site runoff and sedimentation
 Stagnant water and unsanitary conditions may cause mosquito breeding at site.
Solid Waste
Generation of non-hazardous solid waste in the form of excavated earth is envisaged
during the construction period. There will be temporary piling of excavated earth and
shall be utilized for mulching the Mounded Bullets and for levelling of the low lying area
in the bottling plant. During construction, some solid materials are expected to be
generated. The gas cylinders used for welding shall be returned back to the supplier.

Cement bags, plastic buckets, coal tar drums, damaged tools and other containers are used
during construction and discarded as solid wastes as per existing practices and guidelines.
 Identified Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment

 The proposed project does not involve any displacement of inhabitants for the
construction of LPG Bottling Plant.
 Construction phase could lead to creation of employment and procurement opportunities.
 A multiplier effect will be felt on the creation of indirect employment through the local
community establishing small shops like tea stalls, supply of intermediate raw materials,
repair outlets, hardware stores garrages etc.
 Self- employment options for individuals possessing vocational or technical training skills
like electricians, welders, fitters etc, which are likely to be sourced locally;
 There would be influx of workers during construction phase which could lead to pressure
on key local infrastructure such as water, healthcare, electricity.
 The construction activity could lead to increased nuisance level from air emissions and
noise due to transportation of material and equipment as well as labourers.
 The construction activity could also lead to water stagnation at pockets which may lead to
breeding of mosquito and related health impacts.
 Identified Impacts on Biological Environment

Terrestrial Ecology
The initial construction work at the project site involves land clearance, cutting/ felling of
negligible number of shrubs and back-filling /levelling. The site for installation of bottling
plant is full of shrubs and grasses. The construction activities involve removal of shrubs and
scrubs only. Removal of shrubs and grasses would not affect the terrestrial ecology.
Aquatic Ecology
Only a small amount of sanitary waste water would be generated during construction phase.
The wastewater so generated shall be disposed off through septic tanks and soak pits. Hence,
no impact is envisaged on aquatic ecology of any surface water source
4.2.2. During Operation Phase
Impact on topography
The receipt, storage and bottling operation will be confined in closed, leak proof system, no
impact is envisaged on the topography during operation phase.
 Identified Impacts on Land/Soil Environment

 Soil quality may be affected by accidental leakage and spillage of hazardous
chemicals/oils during handling
 Improper segregation and disposal of solid waste generated during operation of the
proposed project.

 Identified Impacts on Air Environment
 No emission is envisaged during the storage and handling of LPG in mounded bullets
 No fugitive emission during loading and unloading of LPG in and from mounded bullets
is envisaged
 Impacts on ambient air during operation phase would be due to emissions from operation
of DG sets only during power outages.
 Identified Impacts on Noise Environment

 Impact of noise due to vehicular traffic
 Noise generated due to DG sets
 Identified Impacts on Water Environment

 Stress on existing water supply
 Generation of waste water & domestic effluent
 Increased run off from site.
 Identified Impacts on Socio-Economic Environment

 Project and associated construction of LPG Bottling Plant will eventually lead to
permanent job opportunities in the organized and unorganized sector. There is likely to be
increased demand for security, kitchen help, need for drivers etc.
 Development of physical infrastructure due to construction of the plant which could
benefit the local population.
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous waste will be used oil expected to be generated
 Identified Impacts on Biological Environment

Terrestrial Ecology
The probability and consequences of significant ecological impacts occurring because of the
operation of the bottling plant are considered to be almost negligible. The risk of any leakage
is almost negligible owing to stringent leak prevention technologies.
Aquatic Ecology
The sanitary wastewater of 6.5 m3/day shall be treated in septic tanks and disposed off
through soak pits and rest of the non-sanitary wastewater shall be passed through vapour trap
and used for gardening of green belt areas. No wastewater would be discharged outside the
premises of bottling plant. Hence, no impact is envisaged on aquatic ecology from the
operation of facilitie.

4.3. IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES
4.3.1. During Construction Phase
 Land/Soil Environment Impact Mitigation Measures

 Top soil will be stored carefully and will be used again after construction/installation
phase is over so as to restore the fertility of project site
 Bituminous materials / other chemicals, if any, shall not be allowed to leach into the soil
 Methods to reuse earth material generated during excavation will be followed
 Waste oil generated from D. G. sets will be handed over to authorized recyclers approved
by OSPCB
 Usage of appropriate monitoring and control facilities for construction equipments
deployed
 All hazardous wastes shall be securely stored, under a shed for eventual transportation
and disposal to the authorized dealers
 The solid waste generation due to workers working at site will be segregated and will be
transported and disposed of to the local bodies waste disposal facility
 Chemicals/Paints etc. used during construction phase will be stored safely.
 Air Impact Mitigation Measures

 Checking of vehicles and construction machinery to ensure compliance to Indian
Emission Standards1
 Transportation vehicles, DG sets and machineries to be properly and timely maintained
and serviced regularly to control the emission of air pollutants in order to maintain the
emissions of NOx and SOx within the limits established by CPCB
 Minimize idling time for vehicles and adequate parking provision and proper traffic
arrangement for smooth traffic flow
 Use of good quality fuel and lubricants will be promoted. Moreover, low sulphur content
diesel shall be used as fuel for DG sets to control emission of SO2.
 Water sprinkling shall be carried out to suppress fugitive dust during earthworks and
along unpaved sections of access roads
 Attenuation of pollution/ protection of receptor through planatation/ green cover
However, the construction activities will be for temporary period and hence, its impact on the
existing ambient air quality as well as vegetation will be reversible. Dust emissions are likely
to be confined within the limited area.

 Noise Impact Mitigation Measures
 No noise polluting work in night shifts
 Acoustic enclosures for DG Sets will be provided as per CPCB guidelines
 Pumps – Enclosure in acoustic screen, allowing for engine cooling and exhaust, use of
anti-vibration mounting, flexible couplings of hoses, maintaining adequate inlet pressure
 Provision of intake mufflers, unidirectional fan for Cooling and enclosures for electrical
motors
 Provision of ear plugs for labour in high noise area
 Provision of barricades along the periphery of the site
 All contractors and subcontractors involved in the construction phase shall comply with
the CPCB noise standards
 Activities that take place near sensitive receptors to be carefully planned (restricted to
daytime, taking into account weather conditions etc.)
 Vehicles and generator sets to be serviced regularly and maintained properly to avoid any
unwanted generation of noise or vibration from them
 Use of suitable muffler systems/ enclosures/ sound proof glass paneling on heavy
equipment/ pumps/ blowers
 Pumps and blowers may be mounted on rubber pads or any other noise absorbing
materials
 In case of steady noise levels above 85 dB (A), initiation of hearing conservation
measures
 Strengthening of greenbelt for noise attenuation may be taken up, etc.
 Water Impact Mitigation Measures

 Water Avoidance of wastage of curing water
 Use of tanker water for construction activity.
 Provision of temporary toilets for labour
 Wastewater generated will be recycled/reused during operation of the LPG Plant.
 Socio-Economic Environment Impacts Mitigation Measures

 Employing local people for construction work to the maximum extent possible.
 Providing proper facilities for domestic supply, sanitation, domestic fuel, education,
transportation etc. for the construction workers.
 Barricades, fences and necessary personal protective equipment such as safety helmet,
shoes, goggles, gloves, harness etc. will be provided to the workers and employees.
 Constructional and occupational safety measures to be adopted during construction phase
of the industry.
 The health of workers will be checked for general illness; first time upon employment and
thereafter at periodic intervals, as per the local laws and regulations.
 The workers will be diagnosed for respiratory functions at periodic intervals and during
specific complaints etc. Medical Aid as per Factory Act and Panel doctor facility will be
provided to the workers.

 Job rotation schemes will be practiced for over-exposed persons. Insignificant impact is
expected on the workers health and safety during the operation phase stage.
4.3.2. During Operation Phase
 Land/Soil Environment Impact Mitigation Measures

 Installation of drainage ditches at project site to prevent erosion
 All hazardous wastes shall be securely stored, under a shed for eventual transportation
and disposal to the authorized dearler by OSPCB
 The solid domestic waste shall be segregated and stored within the premises temporarily
and then sent to local body waste management facility.
 Air Impact Mitigation Measures
 Monitoring of stack emissions for PM, NOx and SO2 should be carried out regularly to
meet the statutory requirements.
 All the internal roads should be asphalted to reduce the fugitive dust due to truck
movement
 Transportation vehicles, generators and machineries to be properly and timely
maintained and serviced regularly to control the emission of air pollutants in order to
maintain the emissions of NOX and SOX within the limits established by CPCB
 Stack height of DG sets shall be as per norms of CPCB to allow effective dispersion of
pollutants
 Storage facilities shall be equipped with leak detection systems
 Minimize idling time for vehicles and adequate parking provision and proper traffic
arrangement for smooth traffic flow
 Attenuation of pollution/ protection of receptor through plantation/ green cover
 Noise Impact Mitigation Measures

 Provision of proper parking arrangement, traffic management plan for smooth flow of
vehicles help to abate noise pollution due to vehicular traffic.
 Green belts and landscaping shall act as noise buffer.
 Water Impact Mitigation Measures
 The proposed project will be operated on „Zero Discharge Concept‟.

 There will be no industrial effluent generated in this plant. The sanitary wastewater 6.5
m3/day) will be disposed through septic tanks and soak pit and rest of the waste water
will be reused in gardening of greenbelt areas after treatment. Hence, no waste water
shall be discharged outside the plant boundary.
 Rain water harvesting shall be promoted. Rainwater from the landscape area and
hardscape area will be used to recharge the ground water sources through recharge pit

 Provision of Storm water drainage system with adequate capacity, Proper maintenance of
storm water
Wastewater Generation & Disposal
Water Consumption Wastewater Generation &

Disposal
Sl. No Particulars Quantity Quantity Disposal

(m3/day) (m3/day) Method
1 Domestic water 8 6.5 septic tanks and

requirement disposed off
through soak
pits
2 Industrial water 5 4 Waste is treated

requirement (Cylinder in ETP and used
washing) for gardening of
green belt areas.
3 Gardening 2
Total 15 10.5
 Socio-Economic Environment Impacts Mitigation Measures

 Both skilled and unskilled local person shall be given preference for the jobs in the
operation and maintenance of the plant.
4.4. IMPACT MATRIX
The matrix was designed for the assessment of impacts associated with almost any type of
project. Its method of a checklist that incorporates qualitative information on cause-and-effect
relationships but it is also useful for communicating results.
Matrix method incorporates a list of impacting activities and their likely environmental
impacts, presented in a matrix format. Combining these lists as horizontal and vertical axes in
the matrix allows the identification of cause effect relationships, if any, between specific
activities and impacts. The impact matrix for the actions identified in Table 4.1 along with
various environmental parameters. A rating scale has been devised to give severity of impacts
in the following manner.
A. Beneficial (positive) impact – Long term

B. Low beneficial impact – Short term
C. Strong adverse (negative) impact – Long term
D. Low adverse impact (localized in nature) – Short term

E. No impacts on environment
Table 4.1: Impact Matrix
Positive Impact Negative Impact

No
Sl.No. Activity Short Long Short Long
Impact
Term Term Term Term
Pre-Project Activity
1 Displacement and
√
resettlement of local people
2 Change in land use √
3 Loss of trees/vegetation √
4 Shifting of equipment,
√
machinery and material
5 Employment for local people √
Construction Phase
1 Pressure on infrastructure and
√
transportation system
2 Impact on air quality
√
including dust generation
3 Noise Pollution √
4 Traffic √
5 Impact on the land/soil
√
environment
6 Impact on groundwater √
7 Stacking and disposal of
√
construction material
8 Impact on water quality √
9 Health and safety conditions
√
of people
10 Social impact √
11 Economic impact √
Operation Phase
1 Increase in air pollution and
√
noise levels
2 Water harvesting and recharge √
3 Disposal of solid waste √
4 Infrastructure development √
5 Quality of life √
6 Handling operations for
transfer,
√
charging of raw materials,
final product
4.5. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

MEASURES
The summary of the Impacts and Mitigation measures for the above mentioned
environmental attributes is as summarized in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Impacting Activity Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Compliance/

Environment/ Source Environment Health and Environment/ Social Attribute Standards/ Best
Social Contaminants Safety Practice
Attribute Guidelines
Source
Contaminants
Construction Phase
Construction Generation of Possible Potential risk of  Local workers will be employed, --
Workers sewage, organic contamination respiratory as far as possible.
wastes, of project site irritation,  Proper sanitation facilities will be
construction and nearby discomfort, or provided for the workers
debris etc. water bodies illness to  There are no temporary shelters
workers provided because local workers
will be engaged
Air Emissions Dust and air Rise in PM Potential risk of  Barricading sheets shall be CPCB - National
emission level at project respiratory provided Ambient Air
particularly due to site irritation,  Provision of spraying water to Quality
the excavation, discomfort, or reduce dust emission Standards
construction and illness to  Excavated topsoil to be preserved
movement of workers and reused for landscaping
vehicles resulting  Ensuring all vehicles, generators
in air pollution and compressors are shall be
maintained and regularly serviced
Noise Construction Rise in decibel Unwanted sound  The vehicles used will be with the CPCB - Noise
Generation noise mainly due level of can cause proper acoustic measures Pollution
to excavation, ambient noise problems within  Wherever this cannot be achieved (Regulation and
Moving of the body. the area will be earmarked as high Control) Rules
vehicles, noise level area requiring use of
operations of ear protection gadgets
cranes etc.  Avoid night time work
Source
Contaminants
Soil and  Spillage of  All fuel, Liquid storage will be

Groundwater concrete sited on an impervious base within
Contamination mixture a bund and secured place. The base
containing and bund walls will be
additives and impermeable to the material stored
plasticizers. and of an adequate capacity.
 Spillage of Storage at or above roof level will
construction be avoided
material  Leaking or empty drums will be
containing handled as per environment
heavy metals, management plan
paints, coatings,  Special care will be taken during
liners, etc. deliveries of construction
materials, especially when fuels
and hazardous materials are being
handled
 Ensure that workers know what to
do in the event of a spillage
Operation Phase
Air Emissions  Release of  Negligible Negligible  The DG sets shall be provided with
emission from Impact Impact Stack Height per CPCB guidelines.
the DG Sets in  Regular monitoring
case of power
failure and
operation of
Source
Contaminants
fire Engine in
case of fire drill
or emergency
Wastewater Domestic waste  Negligible Negligible  Septic tank and soak pit shall be
water arising from Impact Impact provided for domestic sewage
Restroom and treatment.
Canteen
Hazardous  Risk of fire Potential risk of Storage equipment should meet OISD- 144 - Fire
Materials, Fire and loss of life or standards for structural design and Protection
and Explosion explosions injury due to fire integrity. Facilities for
due to the proposed LPG
flammable . Bottling Plant.
and
combustible
nature of
LPG
 Risk of leaks
and accidental
releases from
equipment,
tanks, pipes
etc during
loading and
unloading
(handling)
Hazardous  No Hazardous
 Same to be  To be Srored To be disposed
Source
Contaminants
Waste Waste except Stored in in Designated to CPCB
used barrels place on accredited Party.
lubricating Oil Concree
platform
The above table can be summarized as shown in below matrix as Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: Overall Matrix
4.6. CONCLUSION
From the above discussion it can be concluded that proposed project activity at Mouza Somanathpur
District Khordha, Odisha shall not create any significant negative impact on physical features, water,
noise and air environment. The proposed project shall generate additional indirect employment and
indirect service sector enhancement in the region and would help in the socio-economic up-liftmen
of the local area as well as the state.
CHAPTER 5: ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATES
5.1 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY
 The project proposal relates to installation of 3 Numbers of Mounded Bullets of 600 MT

capacities each for Storage of LPG for LPG Cylinder Bottling.
 IOCL has mastered through past experiences the art and technology of installation of Mounded
Bullets and operating them safely.
 LPG Department of Marketing Division of IOCL has earned a good credential for installation of
Mounded Bullets in Odisha and all over India of various capacities.
 The above expertises of IOCL are well proven and working efficiently at different locations of
the country including Eastern states without fail.
 IOCL is having excellent track record and progressive outlook in regularly updating its
technology. The technology adopted by IOCL for installation of Mounded Bullets for storage of
LPG is a fail-safe.
5.2 ALTERNATIVE SITE
No alternative site is considered because it is well connected by road and Rail and is a barren land
and no habitation exists on the plot and therefore no R&R issue is involved. In future the Project may
be connected though pipeline after conducting Detailed Feasibility Report and analysis, the same
shall be separate project if directed by Government of India.
CHAPTER :6: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Environmental Management is nothing but resource management and environmental planning is just
the same as development planning. They are just the other side of the same coin. The resource
management and development planning look at the issue from narrow micro-economical point of
view while environmental management views the issue from the broader prospective of long term
sustained development option, which ensures that the environment is not desecrated.
For the effective and consistent functioning of the project, proper environmental monitoring
programme shall be continued to be carried out at the LPG Bottling Plant.
The programme includes the following:

 Environmental Monitoring
 Personnel Training
 Regular Environmental audits and Correction measures
 Documentation–standards operation procedures Environmental Management Plan and other
records
6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
Work of monitoring shall be carried out at the locations to assess the environmental health in the post
period. A post study monitoring programme is important as it provides useful information on the
following aspects.
 It helps to verify the predictions on environmental impacts presented in this study.
 It helps to indicate warnings of the development of any alarming environmental situations, and
thus, provides opportunities for adopting appropriate control measures in advance.
The monitoring programmes in different areas of environment, outlined in the next few sections,
have been based on the findings of the impact assessment studies described in Chapter 4. Post study
monitoring programme have been summed up in Table 6.1.
Table-6.1: Environmental Monitoring During Project construction Stage
Sr. No. Potential Action to be Parameters for Frequency of

Impact Followed Monitoring Monitoring
1 Air Emissions All equipments Random checks Periodic
are operated of equipment
within specified logs/ manuals
design
parameters
Vehicle trips to Vehicle logs Periodic during
be optimized to site clearance &
the extent construction
possible activities
Maintenance of Gaseous Periodic

DG set emissions emissions (SO2, emission
to meet HC, CO, NOx) monitoring
stipulated
standards
Ambient air The ambient air As per CPCB /

quality within the quality shall OPCB
premises of the conform to the requirement or
proposed unit to standards for on monthly basis
be monitored PM10, PM2.5, whichever is
SO2, NOx, and earlier
CO
2 Noise List of all noise Equipment logs, Regular during

generating noise reading construction
machinery onsite activities
along with age to
be prepared.
Equipment to be
maintained in
good working
order
Night working is Working hour Daily records

to be minimized. records
Generation of Maintenance of Daily records

vehicular noise. records of
vehicles
Noise to be Spot noise As per CPCB/

monitored in recording OPCB
ambient air requirement or
within the plant on quarterly
premises. basis whichever
is earlier
3 Wastewater No untreated No discharge Periodic during
Discharge discharge to be hoses shall be in construction
made to surface vicinity of activities
water, watercourses.
groundwater or
soil.
4 Soil Erosion Protect topsoil Effective cover Periodic during

stockpile where in place. construction
possible at edge activities
of site.
5 Drainage and Ensure drainage Visual inspection Periodic during

wastewater system and of drainage and construction
Management specific design records thereof activities
measures are
working
effectively. The
design to
incorporate
existing drainage
pattern and avoid
disturbing the
same.
6 Waste Implement waste Comprehensive Periodic check

Management management Waste during
plan that Management construction
identifies and Plan should be in activities
characterizes place and
every waste available for
arising inspection on-
associated with site. Compliance
proposed with MSW
activities and Rules, 2016 and
which identifies Hazardous
the procedures Wastes
for collection, (Management,
handling & Handling and
disposal of each Trans boundary
waste arising. Movement)
Rules, 2016
7 Health Employees and All relevant Regular check
migrant labour parameters ups
health check ups including HIV
8 Loss of flora and Re-vegetation as No. of plants, During site

fauna per Forest species clearance
guidelines
Table-6.2: Environmental Monitoring During Project Operation Stage
Sr. No Particulars Monitoring Method of Important Monitoring

Frequency Sampling Parameters
I Air Pollution & Meteorology
A Stack
Monitoring
1 D.G Sets Once Online Flue gas temp., velocity,
flow, dust conc., SO2,
NOx
B. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
1 3 - 4 No. of Twice in a week 24 hr. As per NAAQs 2009 PM,
AAQ SO2, NOx, Hydrocarbons
locations as HC, VOC
C. Meteorology
1 Wind speed, direction, temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure,
rainfall etc shall be monitored at plant.
II Water and Wastewater Quality
A Domestic
1 - - As per CTO conditions
B. Industrial Wastewaters
1 Outlet of the Once in a Day 24 hr As per CTO conditions
ETP composite
C. Water quality
1 Ground Water Once in a month Grab Parameters specified
under IS:2295 (Class C)
and IS:10500,
III Industrial Noise Levels
1 Near Once in 5 months 8 hr Noise levels in dB(A)
administrative continuous
office with 1 hr
2 Pump house interval Noise levels in dB(A)
3 D G area Noise levels in dB(A)
Ambient Noise Levels
1 Four locations Once in three 24 hr Noise levels in dB(A)
months for the continuous
industry Once in with one hr
Sr. No Particulars Monitoring Method of Important Monitoring
Frequency Sampling Parameters
I Air Pollution & Meteorology
A Stack
Monitoring
1 D.G Sets Once Online Flue gas temp., velocity,
flow, dust conc., SO2,
NOx
B. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
1 3 - 4 No. of Twice in a week 24 hr. As per NAAQs 2009 PM,
AAQ SO2, NOx, Hydrocarbons
locations as HC, VOC
C. Meteorology
1 Wind speed, direction, temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure,
rainfall etc shall be monitored at plant.
II Water and Wastewater Quality
A Domestic
1 - - As per CTO conditions
B. Industrial Wastewaters
each season for interval
ambient noise
levels
IV Soil Quality
1 Inside the Pre-Monsoon Grab Physio-chemical
plant and Post parameters
Monsoon season
6.2.1 Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring of ambient air quality at the LPG Bottling Plant site shall be continued to be carried out
on a regular basis to ascertain the levels of hydrocarbons in the atmosphere; ambient air quality shall
be monitored as per Table 6.1& 6.2.
6.2.2 Surface Water Quality
Water quality constitutes another important area in the post study monitoring programme. There are
no major streams or perennial sources of surface water in the study area. Contamination of surface
water in the vicinity of LPG Bottling Plant area during the operation is possible only in one form.
6.2.3 Noise Level
Ambient noise levels have been monitored at 8 stations inside and outside the plant during baseline
season for day time and night time.
6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CELL
The location-in-charge of the LPG Bottling Plantwith the assistance of operation and maintenance
engineers at respective stations presently look after environmental management. Technical officers
of the LPG Bottling Plantstation shall regularly carry out the following:
 Sampling and analysis of noise and water samples.
 Systematic and routine housekeeping at the LPG Bottling Plant
Apart from the regulatory requirements, officials conduct inter station environment auditing to
improve the performance. As part of company‟s endeavour, the IOCL has been accredited with
national and international certification of repute such as ISO: 14001 and ISO: 9002. Under this
following aspects are covered.
 Following the changes/amendments to central/state legislation pertaining to environment

management.
 Assessing the level of experience, competence and training to ensure the capability of
personnel, especially those carrying out specialized environmental management functions.
 Conducting environmental awareness programme for the employees at LPG Bottling Plant
site.
 Measurement of pollution emissions and levels at LPG Bottling Plantthrough an external
agency approved by OPCB.
6.4 BUDGETARY ALLOCATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES
IOCL has proposed a capital investment of Rs 954 lacs and a recurring cost of Rs. 21 lacs per annum
for environmental protection measures. The details of investment for procuring the equipment for
efficient control and monitoring of pollution along with annual recurring cost are given in Table 6.3.
Table 6.3: Cost of Environmental Protection Measures
S.No. Particulars Capital Cost Recurring Cost in

lacs Lacs
1. Air Pollution Control - 1.5
2 Firefighting facilities and other 900 6
safety equipment
2. Water Pollution Control 12 3
3. Noise Pollution Control 9 1
4. Environment Monitoring and 3 0.5
Management
5. Occupational Health 25 2
6. Green Belt 5 1
Total 954 15
CHAPTER 7 - ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1. PUBLIC CONSULTATION
As per thel Terms of Reference (TOR) for EIA issued by Expert Appraisal Committee, Odisha vide
the MOM of 15st SEAC meeting held during 15th to September 2017, the public hearing has been
stipulated according to the provisions of EIA Notification number SO 1533(E) dated 14-09-2006
and the procedure described at Khordha District of Odisha on 20th July 2018.
Public notice was published in local newspapers by the state board both in English and local
Language on 14.06.2018 & 13.06.2018.
Suggestions, comments, views and objections from local people on environmental issues regarding
the project were invited through notice. Written suggestion/Views/Comments / Objections were
received.
The proceedings of public hearing as received from PCB are enclosed as Annexure- VIII.:
7.2 QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
7.2.1. Scope of Study
The scope of the QRA is given below:
 Identification of Hazards and Major Loss of Containment (LOC) events.
 Calculation of physical effects of accidental scenarios, which includes frequency analysis for
incident scenarios leading to hazards to people and facilities (flammable gas, fire, and smoke and
explosion overpressure hazards) and consequence analysis for the identified hazards covering
impact on people and potential escalation.
 Damage limits identification and quantification of the risks and contour mapping on the plant
layout.
 Risk contour mapping.
 Evaluation of risks against risk acceptable limit
 Risk reduction measures to prevent incident to control the accident
 Hazard mitigation recommendations based on QRA
 Provide consolidated conclusion on QRA of location
7.2.2. Description of the Facility
The main operation of proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur is to receive bulk LPG
through bullet trucks from Paradip Refinery, Haldia Refinery, IPPL Haldia or HPCL Vizag Refinery,
safely stored into mounded storage vessels, Bottled to LPG Cylinders and then dispatch the same to
distributors in Khordha and adjoining districts.
There are mainly two operations:
 Filling operation
 TLD (Tank Truck Decantation) operation
In TLD operation, the product i.e. LPG from tank truck is received and transferred into Mounded
Storage Vessels and filling bottling operation comprises in cylinders and dispatched in lorries to
various consumers in Khordha.
The Bottling Plant is proposed on a plot area of which in 32 Acres and has a total storage capacity
of 1800 MT. There will be basically 3 Mounded Bullets in the facility, 1 pump house (TLF)(PPH),
one TLD gantry of 8unloading baysrespectively, 2 numbers of 24 Points electronic filling Carousal,
Empty cum filling shed for cylinders,one emergency gate,fire water pump house, administrative
building, parking area for vehicles (Trucks and Tankers).
Table 7.1 Storage Facility

S.NO Tank Product Type Capacity
MT
1 Bullet LPG Mounded 600
7.2.3. Methodology
7.2.3.1. An Overview
Risk Analysis is proven valuable as a management tool in assessing the overall safety performance
of the Chemical Process Industry. Although management systems such as engineering codes,
checklists, and reviews by experienced engineers have provided substantial safety assurances, major
incidents involving numerous casualties, injuries and significant damage can occur - as illustrated by
recent world-scale catastrophes. Risk Analysis techniques provide advanced quantitative means to
supplement other hazard identification, analysis, assessment, control and management methods to
identify the potential for such incidents and to evaluate control strategies.
The underlying basis of Risk Analysis is simple in concept. It offers methods to answer the following
four questions:
1. What can go wrong?

2. What are the causes?
3. What are the consequences?
4. How likely is it?
This study tries to quantify the risks to rank them accordingly based on their severity and probability.
The report shall be used to understand the significance of existing control measures and to follow the
measures continuously. Wherever possible the additional risk control measures shall be adopted to
bring down the risk levels. The methodology adopted for the QRA Study has been depicted in the
flow chart given below:
Figure 7.1: Methodology
7.2.3.2. Risk Assessment Procedure
Hazard identification and risk assessment involves a series of steps as follows:
Step 1: Identification of the Hazard
Based on consideration of factors such as the physical & chemical properties of the fluids being
handled, the arrangement of equipment, operating & maintenance procedures and process conditions,
external hazards such as third party interference, extreme environmental conditions, aircraft /
helicopter crash shall also be considered.
Step 2: Assessment of the Risk
Arising from the hazards and consideration of its tolerability to personnel, the facility and the
environment, this involves the identification of initiating events, possible accident sequences, and
likelihood of occurrence and assessment of the consequences. The acceptability of the estimated risk
must then be judged based upon criteria appropriate to the particular situation.
Step 3: Elimination or Reduction of the Risk
Where this is deemed to be necessary, this involves identifying opportunities to reduce the likelihood
and/or consequence of an accident.
 Hazard Identification is a critical step in Risk Analysis. Many aids are available, including
experience, engineering codes, checklists, detailed process knowledge, equipment failure
experience, hazard index techniques, What-if Analysis, Hazard and Operability (HAZOP)
Studies, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA).
In this phase all potential incidents are identified and tabulated. Site visit and study of operations
and documents like drawings, process write-up etc. are used for hazard identification.
 Assessment of Risks is based on the consequences and likelihood. Consequence Estimation is

the methodology used to determine the potential for damage or injury from specific incidents. A
single incident (e.g. rupture of a pressurized flammable liquid tank) can have many distinct
incident outcomes (e.g. Unconfined Vapour Cloud Explosion (UVCE), flash fire.
 Likelihood assessment is the methodology used to estimate the frequency or probability of

occurrence of an incident. Estimates may be obtained from historical incident data on failure
frequencies or from failure sequence models, such as fault trees and event trees. In this study the
historical data developed by software models and those collected by CPR18E – Committee for
Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands (Edition: PGS 3, 2005) are used.
 Risk Assessment combines the consequences and likelihood of all incident outcomes from all
selected incidents to provide a measure of risk. The risks of all selected incidents are individually
estimated and summed to give an overall measure of risk.
 Risk-reduction measures include those to prevent incidents (i.e. reduce the likelihood of
occurrence) to control incidents (i.e. limit the extent & duration of a hazardous event) and to
mitigate the effects (i.e. reduce the consequences). Preventive measures, such as using inherently
safer designs and ensuring asset integrity, shall be used wherever practicable. In many cases, the
measures to control and mitigate hazards and risks are simple and obvious and involve
modifications to conform to standard practice. The general hierarchy of risk reducing measures
is:
 Prevention (by distance or design)

 Detection (e.g. fire & gas, Leak detection)
 Control (e.g. emergency shutdown & controlled depressurization)
 Mitigation (e.g. firefighting and passive fire protection)
 Emergency response (in case safety barriers fail)
7.2.3.3. Identificationof Hazards and Release scenarios
A technique commonly used to generate an incident list is to consider potential leaks and major
releases from fractures of all process pipelines and vessels. This compilation includes all pipe work
and vessels in direct communication, as these may share a significant inventory that cannot be
isolated in an emergency. The following data were collected to envisage scenarios:
 Composition of materials stored in vessels / flowing through pipeline

 Inventory of materials stored in vessels
 Flow rate of materials passing through pipelines
 Vessels / Pipeline conditions (phase, temperature, pressure)
 Connecting piping and piping dimensions.
Accidental release of flammable liquids / gases can result in severe consequences. Delayed ignition
of flammable gases can result in blast overpressures covering large areas. This may lead to extensive
loss of life and property. In contrast, fires have localized consequences. Fires can be put out or
contained in most cases; there are few mitigating actions one can take once a flammable gas or a
vapour cloud gets released. Major accident hazards arise, therefore, consequent upon the release of
flammable gases.
7.2.3.4. Factors for Identification of Hazrds
In any installation, main hazard arises due to loss of containment during handling of flammable
liquids / gases. To formulate a structured approach to identification of hazards, an understanding of
contributory factors is essential.
 Blast over Pressures
Blast Overpressures depend upon the reactivity class of material and the amount of gas between two
explosive limits. These gases in general have medium reactivity and in case of confinement of the
gas cloud, on delayed ignition may result in an explosion and overpressures.
 Operating Parameters
Potential gas release for the same material depends significantly on the operating conditions. The
gases are likely to operate at atmospheric temperature (and hence high pressures). This operating
range is enough to release a large amount of gas in case of a leak / rupture, therefore the pipeline
leaks and ruptures need to be considered in the risk analysis calculations.
 Inventory
Inventory Analysis is commonly used in understanding the relative hazards and short listing of
release scenarios. Inventory plays an important role in regard to the potential hazard. Larger the
inventory of a vessel or a system, larger is the quantity of potential release. A practice commonly
used to generate an incident list is to consider potential leaks and major releases from fractures of
pipelines and vessels/tanks containing sizable inventories.
 Range of Incidents
Both the complexity of study and the number of incident outcome cases are affected by the range of
initiating events and incidents covered. This not only reflects the inclusion of accidents and / or non-
accident-initiated events, but also the size of those events. For instance studies may evaluate one or
more of the following:
 Catastrophic failure of container

 Large hole (large continuous release)
 Smaller holes (continuous release)
 Leaks at fittings or valves (small continuous release)
In general, quantitative studies do not include very small continuous releases or short duration small
releases if past experience or preliminary consequence modeling shows that such releases do not
contribute to the overall risk levels.
 Selection of Initiating Events & Incidents
The selection of initiating events and incidents shall take into account the goals or objectives of the
study and the data requirements. The data requirements increase significantly when non -accident -
initiated events are included and when the number of release size increase. While the potential range
of release sizes is tremendous, groupings are both appropriate and necessitated by data restrictions.
The main reasons for including release sizes other than the catastrophic are to reduce the
conservatism in an analysis and to better understand the relative contributions to risk of small versus
large releases.
As per CPR 18 E guidelines & Reference Manual BEVI Risk Assessments Version 3.2 only the Loss
of Containment (LOC) which is basically the release scenarios contributing to the individual and/ or
societal risk are included in the QRA. LOCs of the plant are included only if the following conditions
are fulfilled:
 Frequency of occurrence is equal to or greater than 10-8 and

 Lethal damage (1% probability) occurs outside the establishment‟s boundary or the transport
route.
There may be number of accidents that may occur quite frequently, but due to proper control
measures or fewer quantities of chemicals released, they are controlled effectively. A few examples
are a leak from a gasket, pump or valve, release of a LPG from a relief valve, and fire in a pump due
to overheating. These accidents generally are controlled before they escalate by using control
systems and monitoring devices – used because such piping and equipment are known to sometimes
fail or malfunction, leading to problems.
On the other hand, there are less problematic areas / units that are generally ignore or not given due
attention. Such LOCs are identified by studying the facilities and Event Tree Analysis etc. and
accidents with less consequence are ignored. Some of the critical worst case scenarios identified by
the Hazard Identification study are also assessed as per the guidelines of Environment Protection
Agency.
7.2.4. Types of Outcome Events
In this section of the report we describe the probabilities associated with the sequence of occurrences
which must take place for the incident scenarios to produce hazardous effects and the modeling of
their effects.
Considering the present case the outcomes expected are
 Bleve
 Jet Fires
 Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE)
 Heavy Cloud Dispersion
Jet fire occurs when a pressurized release (of a flammable fluid) is ignited by any source. They tend
to be localized in effect and are mainly of concern in establishing the potential for domino effects
and employee safety zones rather than for community risks.
The jet fire model is based on the radiant fraction of total combustion energy, which is assumed to
arise from a point slowly along the jet flame path. The jet dispersion model gives the jet flame
length.
 Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE)
Vapour cloud explosion is the result of flammable materials in the atmosphere, a subsequent
dispersion phase, and after some delay an ignition of the vapour cloud. Turbulence is the governing
factor in blast generation, which could intensify combustion to the level that will result in an
explosion. Obstacles in the path of vapour cloud or when the cloud finds a confined area, as under
the bullets, often create turbulence. Insignificant level of confinement will result in a flash fire. The
VCE will result in overpressures.
It may be noted that VCEs have been responsible for very serious accidents involving severe
property damage and loss of lives. Vapour Cloud Explosions in the open area with respect to Pure
Methane is virtually impossible due to their lower density.
7.2.5. Probabilities
 Population Probabilities
It is necessary to know the population exposure in order to estimate the consequences and the risk
resulting from an incident. The exposed population is often defined using a population density.
Population densities are an important part of a QRA for several reasons. The most notable is that the
density is typically used to determine the number of people affected by a given incident with a
specific hazard area. Sometimes, population data are available in sketchy forms. In the absence of
specific population data default categories can be used.
The population density can be averaged over the whole area that may be affected or the area can be
subdivided into any number of segments with a separate population density for each individual
segment. The population data for the outside population and inside population has been taken from
census data.
 Population in the Proposed Bottling Plant;
Officers 8
Workmen 10
Contract labourers 35
Security 22
Electrical personnel 4
Parking Area 100
 Nearby village and surrounding Population in 2Km;
Somnathpur 1500
Kurarhmal 500
Dadhimachhagarhia 1000
 Failure/Accident Probabilities
The failure data is taken from CPR 18E –Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment, developed by
the Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands.
The failure frequency data and list of scenarios is given in Table No.7.4
 Weather Probabilities
The following meteorological data is used for the study:
 Wind Speed : 1.5m/s and 5m/s

 Atmospheric Temperature : 30°C to 45°C
 Atmospheric Pressure : 101.325 KN/m2
 Humidity : 30% to 64%
 Surface roughness : 0.02 m
 Solar Radiation : 0.12kW/m2
 Wind stability class : F (1.5F)
Wind proportion in each direction with respect to each wind speed is calculated and tabulated below
based on the wind rose chart of Khordha.
Table 7.2 Wind Proportion Details
Wind Direction Distribution

N 1.1
NNE 2.6
NE 3.8
ENE 4.9
E 6.5
ESE 5.9
SE 4.5
SSE 3.5
S 4
SSW 2.8
SW 3.6
WSW 4.4
W 13.3
WNW 21.7
NW 13.5
NNW 3.9
7.2.6. Stability Class
The tendency of the atmosphere to resist or enhance vertical motion and thus turbulence is termed as
stability. Stability is related to both the change of temperature with height (the lapse rate) driven by
the boundary layer energy budget, and wind speed together with surface characteristics (roughness).
A neutral atmosphere neither enhances nor inhibits mechanical turbulence. An unstable atmosphere
enhances turbulence, whereas a stable atmosphere inhibits mechanical turbulence.
Stability classes are defined for different meteorological situations, characterized by wind speed and
solar radiation (during the day) and cloud cover during the night. The so called Pasquill-Turner
stability classes‟ dispersion estimates include six (6) stability classes as below:
A – Very Unstable
B – Unstable
C – Slightly Unstable
D – Neutral
E – Stable
F – Very Stable
The typical stability classes for various wind speed and radiation levels during entire day are
presented in Table 7.3:
Table 7.3: PasquiIl’s Stability Class
Day : Solar Radiation Night : cloud Cover

Wind Speed
Thinly Overcast >
(m/s) Strong Moderate Slight Moderate
< 40% 80%
<2 A A-B B - - D
2-3 A-B B C E F D
3-5 B B-C C D E D
5-6 C C-D D D D D
>6 C D D D D D
For the study purpose, and consistent with good industry practice, the following weather conditions
have been considered:
 1.5F - F stability class and wind speed of 1.5m/sec
 5D - D stability class and wind speed of 5m/sec
 Ignition Probabilites
For gas/ oil releases from the gas/ oil handling system, where a large percentage of rupture events
may be due to third party damage, a relatively high probability of immediate ignition is generally
used.
Delayed ignition takes other factors into account. Delayed ignition probabilities can also be
determined as a function of the cloud area or the location. In general as the size of the cloud
increases, the probability of delayed ignition decreases. This is due to the likelihood that the cloud
has already encountered an ignition source and ignited before dispersing over a larger area (i.e. the
cloud reaches an ignition source relatively close to the point of origin).
For this study the ignition probabilities have been modified to suit the existing site conditions. The
ignition probabilities inside enclosed areas shall be much higher than the open areas. It is because of
the fact that there will be much more activities taking place and the possibility of ignition increases.
In this study the following probabilities were taken as per CPR 18 E.
Ignition probability for this site: 0.5 for 60 sec for road transport; 0.01 for 60 sec for transmission
line
7.2.7. Scenario Selection
 Scenario Selection of QRA Study
This section documents the consequence-distance calculations, which have been computed for the
accident release scenarios considered
In Risk Analysis studies contributions from low frequency - high outcome effect as well as high
frequency - low outcome events are distinguished; the objective of the study is emergency planning,
hence only holistic & conservative assumptions are used for obvious reasons. Hence though the
outcomes may look pessimistic, the planning for emergency concept shall be borne in mind whilst
interpreting the results.
For this study rupture of LPG storage vessel is not considered as it‟s a mounded storage so the
possibility of rupture of vessel is nearly impossible. Similarly rupture of Road tanker within the
IOCL scope is not possible so it is not considered for the study.
The following are the LOC scenarios which were selected for modeling.
Table 7.4: List of Scenarios & Failure Frequency
Source of Relative Calculated

Flow rate Diameter Release
S.No Scenario Description Streength Humidity Failure
(m3/hr) (m) Duration(S)
(kg) (%) Frequency
18 MT Road tanker 8100 30 0 - - 1.80E-08
1 Bleve 21 MTRoad tanker 9450 30 0 1.80E-08
10 MT filled Cylinder Truck 9000 30 - - - 1.80E-08
Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (100%) - 64 21.8 200 1800 3.13E-06
Pipeline rupture To Carousal (100 %) - 64 17.8 150 1800 7.50E-06
Pipeline rupture From Bullet to pump (100%) - 64 20.8 200 1800 2.50E-06
Heavy Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) - 64 4.4 150 1800 3.75E-05
2 Cloud Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck - 64 10.6 100 1800 6.00E-06
Dispersion Vapour return header under 150 CFM
- 64 14.6 100 1800 3.00E-04
Compression
Carousal return line( liquid) rupture - 64 6.5 50 1800 1.00E-06
Carousal return line ( Vapour) rupture - 64 6.4 50 1800 1.00E-06
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) - 64 12.12 80 1800 5.48E-05
Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck - 30 10.6 100 1800 6.00E-06
Liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet
- 30 515.4 200 1800 3.13E-06
3 Jet Fire suction
Vapour return header under 150 CFM
- 30 14.6 100 1800 1.80E-05
Compression
Carousal return line ( liquid) rupture - 30 6.5 50 1800 1.00E-06
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) rupture - 30 12.12 50 1800 5.48E-05
Vapour Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (100%) - 64 21.8 200 1800 3.13E-06
Cloud
4
Explosion Pipeline rupture To Carousal (100 %) 1800
- 64 17.8 150 7.50E-06
(VCE)
Source of Relative Calculated
Flow rate Diameter Release
S.No Scenario Description Streength Humidity Failure
(m3/hr) (m) Duration(S)
(kg) (%) Frequency
Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (25%) 1800
- 64 5.4 200 1.56E-05
Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) 1800
- 64 4.4 150 3.75E-05
Liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet - 1800
64 515.4 200 3.13E-06
suction
Liquid line rupture (25%) from Bullet 1800
- 64 128.8 200 1.56E-05
suction
Carousal return line ( liquid ) rupture 1800
- 64 6.5 50 1.00E-05
7.2.8. Consequencce Analysis
 Consequence Calculations
In consequence analysis, use is made of a number of calculation models to estimate the physical
effects of an accident (spill of hazardous material) and to predict the damage (lethality, injury,
material destruction) of the effects.
Accidental release of flammable liquids / gases can result in severe consequences. Immediate
ignition of the pressurized chemical will result in a jet flame. Delayed ignition of flammable vapors
can result in blast overpressures covering large areas. This may lead to extensive loss of life and
property. In contrast, fires have localized consequences. Fires can be put out or contained in most
cases; there are few mitigating actions one can take once a vapour cloud gets released.
The calculations can roughly be divided in three major groups:
a) Determination of the source strength parameters;

b) Determination of the consequential effects;
c) Determination of the damage or damage distances.
The basic physical effect models consist of the following.
 Source strength parameters
 Calculation of the outflow of liquid out of a vessel / Tank or a pipe, in case of rupture. Also
Two-phase outflow can be calculated.
 Calculation, in case of liquid outflow, of the instantaneous flash evaporation and of the
dimensions of the remaining liquid pool.
 Calculation of the evaporation rate, as a function of volatility of the material, pool dimensions
and wind velocity.
 Source strength equals pump capacities, etc. in some cases.
 Consequential effects
 Dispersion of gaseous material in the atmosphere as a function of source strength, relative
density of the gas, weather conditions and topographical situation of the surrounding area.
 Intensity of heat radiation [in kW/ m2] due to a fire, as a function of the distance to the source.
 Energy of vapour cloud explosions [in N/m2], as a function of the distance to the distance of the
exploding cloud.
 Concentration of gaseous material in the atmosphere, due to the dispersion of evaporated
chemical. The latter can be either explosive or toxic.
 It may be obvious, that the types of models that must be used in a specific risk study strongly
depend upon the type of material involved:
 Gas, vapour, liquid, solid
 Inflammable, explosive, toxic, toxic combustion products
 Stored at high/low temperatures or pressure
 Controlled outflow (pump capacity) or catastrophic failure
 Selection of Damage Criteria
The damage criteria give the relation between the extents of the physical effects (exposure) and the
effect of consequences. For assessing the effects on human beings consequences are expressed in
terms of injuries and the effects on equipment / property in terms of monetary loss.
The effect of consequences for release of toxic substances or fire can be categorized as
 Damage caused by heat radiation on material and people;

 Damage caused by explosion on structure and people;
 Damage caused by toxic exposure.
In Consequence Analysis studies, in principle three types of exposure to hazardous effects are
distinguished:
1. Heat radiation due to fires. In this study, the concern is that of Jet fires and flash fires.
2. Explosions
3. Toxic effects, from toxic materials or toxic combustion products.
The knowledge about these relations depends strongly on the nature of the exposure. Following are
the criteria selected for damage estimation:
Heat Radiation:
The effect of fire on a human being is in the form of burns. There are three categories of burn such as
first degree, second degree and third degree burns. The consequences caused by exposure to heat
radiation are a function of:
o The radiation energy onto the human body [kW/m2];

o The exposure duration [sec];
o The protection of the skin tissue (clothed or naked body).
The limits for 1% of the exposed people to be killed due to heat radiation, and for second-degree
burns are given in the Table7.5 below:
Table 7.5: Effects Due To Incident Radiation Intensity
Incident
Radiation Type of Damage
(kW/m2)
0.7 Equivalent to Solar Radiation
1.6 No discomfort for long exposure
Sufficient to cause pain within 20 sec. Blistering of skin
4.0
(first degree burns are likely)
Pain threshold reached after 8 sec. second degree burns after 20
9.5
sec.
Minimum energy required for piloted ignition of wood, melting
12.5
plastic tubing‟s etc.
37.5 Damage to process equipment‟s
The actual results would be less severe due to the various assumptions made in the models arising
out of the flame geometry, emissivity, angle of incidence, view factor and others. The radiative
output of the flame would be dependent upon the fire size, extent of mixing with air and the flame
temperature. Some fraction of the radiation is absorbed by carbon dioxide and water vapour in the
intervening atmosphere. Finally the incident flux at an observer location would depend upon the
radiation view factor, which is a function of the distance from the flame surface, the observer‟s
orientation and the flame geometry.
 Assumptions made for the study (As per the guidelines of CPR 18E Purple Book)
1. The lethality of a jet fire is assumed to be 100% for the people who are caught in the flame.
Outside the flame area, the lethality depends on the heat radiation distances.
2. For the flash fires lethality is taken as 100% for all the people caught outdoors and for 10% who
are indoors within the flammable cloud. No fatality has been assumed outside the flash fire area.
Overpressure:
A. Vapour cloud Explosion (VCE)
The assessment aims is to determine the impact of overpressure in the event that a flammable gas
cloud is ignited. The TNO multi energy model is used to model vapour cloud explosions.
A Vapour cloud Explosion (VCE) results when a flammable vapor is released, its mixture with air
will form a flammable vapour cloud. If ignited, the flame speed may accelerate to high velocities and
produce significant blast overexposure.
The damage effects due to 20mbar, 140mbar & 210mbar are reported in terms of distance from the
overpressure source.
In case of vapour cloud explosion, two physical effects may occur:
 A flash fire over the whole length of the explosive gas cloud;
 A blast wave, with typical peak overpressures circular around ignition source.
 For the blast wave, the lethality criterion is based on:
 A peak overpressure of 0.1bar will cause serious damage to 10% of the housing/structures.
 Falling fragments will kill one of each eight persons in the destroyed buildings.
The following damage criteria may be distinguished with respect to the peak overpressures resulting
from a blast wave:
Table 7.6: Damage due to overpressure
Peak Overpressure Damage Type Description

0.30 bar Heavy Damage Major damage to plant equipment
structure
0.10 bar Moderate Damage Repairable damage to plant
equipment
& structure
0.03 bar Significant Shattering of glass
Damage
0.01 bar Minor Damage Crack in glass
 Assumptions for the study (As per the guidelines of CPR 18 E Purple Books)
1. Overpressure more than 0.3bar corresponds approximately with 50% lethality.
2. An overpressure above 0.2bar would result in 10% fatalities.
3. An overpressure less than 0.1bar would not cause any fatalities to the public.
4. 100% lethality is assumed for all people who are present within the cloud proper.
7.2.9. Consequence Results
Table 7.7: Consequence Results

SCENARIO: A
BLEVE
SL. Failure Scenarios Source Radius of Duration of Intensity of Damage distances from the center of
No. Strength fireball Fireball Radiation the fireball
(kg) (m) (s) inside fireball (m)
(kW/m2) 37.5 12.5 4 kW/m2
kW/m2 kW/m2
a) 18 MT Bullet Truck - 90% 8100 60.4 8.5 190.1 111.07 188.2 306.7
capacity
b) 21 MT Bullet Truck - 90% 9200 65.5 9.1 210 120.05 235.1 350.6
capacity
c) 10 MT Filled Cylinder Truck 9000 62.5 8.8 191.9 115.3 175.3 318.4
d) 600 MT Proposed (Mounded BLEVE not possible for mounded storage vessel
Storage Vessel) - full
capacity
SCENARIO: B
HEAVY CLOUD DISPERSION (Dispersion LEL distance considering Release Time of 1800 sec)
S no. Scenario Pipe Initial Flow rate LEL (m) UEL (m)
size (kg/s)
(mm)
DW CW DW CW
a) 200/150/100 mm liquid line rupture (100%)
1. from bullet truck under pressure of 12Kg/ cm2 200 21.8 26 21.3 6 8.3
(rupture assumed to be away from vessel-
pipe joint)
2. to Carousal @ 110 Kl/ Hr at 15Kg/ cm2) 150 17.8 28 21.6 6 11.0
3. from Bullet to pump at 6 Kg/ cm2) 200 260.2 26.6 82.7 4.2 25.1
(rupture assumed to be at vessel-pipe joint)
b) 200/150/100 mm liquid line rupture ( 25% )
pipe joint)
c) 100 mm vapour line rupture (100%) (from Bullet 100 14.6 44 21.3 10 8.3
truck)
d) 100 mm Vapour return header under 150 CFM 100 14.6 44 21.5 10 8.3
Compression @ 12Kg/ cm2 )
e) 1. 50 mm Carousal return line( liquid) 50 8.9 18 13.7 4 1.9
2 50 mm Carousal return line ( Vapour ) 50 6.4 26 11.3 6 4.4
3. 80 mm unloading arm rupture( liquid) 80 12.12 25 69.1 4.2 21.6
SCENARIO: C
JET FIRE (If ignited)
S no. Scenario Pipe Discharge Thermal Length Width Damage distances (m)
size rate radiation
inside jet
mm kg/s kW/m2 m m 37.5 kW/m2 12.5 kW/m2 4 kW/m2
DW CW DW CW DW CW
a) 100/150/ 200 mm liquid line rupture (100%)
1. from bullet truck under 200 21.8 323.5 52.3 4.5 55.8 9.4 59.8 22.2 65.5 41.8
pressure of 12 Kg/ cm2 under
compressor 150 CFM)
2. to Carousal @ 150Kl/ Hr at 150 12.12 286.3 39.5 3.4 41.2 6.5 44.9 15.6 49.0 29.8
15 Kg/ cm2)
b) 100 mm vapour line rupture 100 10.06 259.4 36.2 3.1 38.1 5.5 40.7 13.3 44.3 25.9
(100%)( from Bullet truck )
c) 200 mm liquid line rupture 200 515.4 154.1 237.3 20.5 241.8 17.3 256.7 52.3 274.9 112.1
(100%) (from Bullet suction
@ 6 KG/ cm2)
d) 100 mm Vapour return header 100 14.6 236.0 43.2 3.7 45.3 5.8 48.4 14.7 52.2 29.1
under 150 CFM Compression
@ 12Kg/ cm2)
e) 1. 50 mm Carousal return line 50 12.12 247.7 39.5 3.4 41.6 5.7 44.4 14.01 48.3 27.5
(liquid)
2. 80 mm unloading arm 80 6.4 227.3 29.1 2.5 30.5 3.9 32.6 9.8 35.4 19.5
rupture (liquid)
SCENARIO: D
VAPOUR CLOUD EXPLOSION
S no. Scenario Pipe Release rate Wind Source Cloud Amount in LEL Damage distances (m)
size velocity & strength for radius/ Explosive distance
Stability dispersion Height limits
mm kg/s kg/s m kg m 0.3 bar 0.1 bar 0.03 bar
a) 100/150/ 200 mm liquid line rupture (100%)
1. from bullet truck 200 21.8 2/F 21.8 21.3/ 3.7 218 26 50.9 101.9 254.8
under pressure of 12
Kg/ cm2,
compression @ 150
CFM)
b) 2. to Carousal @ 150 12.1 2/ F 12.1 13.7/ 3.1 84.7 18 Explosion unlikely
110 Kl/ Hr at 15 Kg/ Qty low
cm2)
c) 200/ 100 mm liquid line rupture (25%)
1. from bullet truck 200 5.4 2/ F 5.4 7.1/ 2.5 21.6 10 Explosion unlikely
under pressure of 12 Qty low
Kg/ cm2)
2. to Carousal @ 150 3.03 2/ F 3.03 4.2/ 2.2 6.1 6 Explosion unlikely
110 Kl/ Hr at 15 Kg/ Qty low
cm2)
d) 200 mm liquid line 200 515.4 2/ F 515.4 97.2/ 20.3 10300 52 184.0 368.0 920.0
rupture (100%)
(from Bullet suction
@ 6 Kg/ cm2)
e) 200 mm liquid line 200 128.8 2/ F 128.8 51.3/ 9.7 1920 40 105.2 210.3 535.8
rupture (25%) (from
Bullet suction @ 6
Kg/ cm2)
f) 50 mm Carousal 50 12.1 2/ F 12.1 13.7/ 3.1 84.7 18 Explosion unlikely
return line (liquid) Qty low
7.2.10. Impact Analysis:
As highlighted in table above, the maximum damage distance reached for Vapour Cloud
Explosion is for 200 mm liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet suction at 1.5F weather
condition. The maximum damage distance for VCE Fire is 184m (0.3 bar), 368m (0.1 bar) &
920m ( 0.03 bar).
 Frequency Analysis
Frequency estimates have been obtained from historical incident data on failure frequencies and
from failure sequence models (event trees). In this study the historical data available in
international renowned databases will be used.
 Reference Manual Bevi Risk Assessments version 3.2

 CPR 18E – Committee for Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands
 The scenario list and frequencies are available in Table No. 7.8
 Event Tree Analysis
A release can result in several possible outcomes or scenarios (fire, explosions, unignited release
etc.). This is because the actual outcome depends on other events that may or may not occur
following the initial release. Event tree analysis is used to identify potential outcomes of a
release and to quantify the risk associated with each of these outcomes.
Figure 7.2: Event Tree Analysis

The above event tree is used for calculating the event frequencies and the probabilities are
defined in below:
 Immediate Ignition Probability
Immediate Ignition
Probability (for Delayed Ignition
Release Rate
Low / Medium Reactive Probability
Chemicals)
< 10 kg/sec 0.02 0.01
10 to 100 kg/sec 0.04 0.05
> 100 kg/sec 0.08 0.1
The above table from Bevi manual & CPR 18E is used for ignition probability.
 Explosion Probability
In the sequence of events, following the ignition of a free gas cloud, an incident occurs
demonstrating characteristics of both a flash fire and an explosion. This is modeled as two
separate events: as a pure fire and a pure explosion. The fraction that is modeled as an explosion,
F explosion, is equal to 0.4.
The leak detection and shutdown systems are classified as Automatic, Semi-automatic & Manual
systems based on the leak detection facilities.
7.2.11. Risk Analysis
 Risk Concept
Risk in general is defined as a measure of potential economic loss or human injury in terms of
the probability of the loss or injury occurring and magnitude of the loss or injury if it occurs.
Risk thus comprises of two variables; magnitude of consequences and the probability of
occurrence. The results of Risk Analysis are often reproduced as Individual and groups risks and
are defined as below.
Individual Risk is the probability of death occurring as a result of accidents at a plant, installation
or a transport route expressed as a function of the distance from such an activity. It is the
frequency at which an individual or an individual within a group may be expected to sustain a
given level of harm (typically death) from the realization of specific hazards.
Such a risk actually exists only when a person is permanently at that spot (out of doors). The
Individual results are based on the occupancy factor for different category of personnel‟s at that
particular location.
Individual Risk = Location Specific Individual risk * Occupancy factor
Whereas Location Specific Individual Risk corresponds to the level of damage at a particular
location or area.
The exposure of an individual is related to:
 The likelihood of occurrence of an event involving a release and Ignition of hydrocarbon,

 The vulnerability of the person to the event,
 The proportion of time the person will be exposed to the event (which is termed „occupancy‟
in the QRA terminology).
The second definition of risk involves the concept of the summation of risk from events
involving many fatalities within specific population groups. This definition is focused on the risk
to society rather than to a specific individual and is termed 'Societal Risk'. In relation to the
process operations we can identify specific groups of people who work on or live close to the
installation; for example communities living or working close to the plant.
 Risk Estimation
 Individual Risk
The Individual Risk (IR) measure, expresses the risk exposure to any Individual who is
continuously present in a particular area for the whole year. The risk exposure is calculated for
all relevant hazards and summed to give the overall risks for the Plants shown below:
Individual and Societal risk of each scenarios is given below in the Table 7.8
Table 7.8: Individual and Societal Risk of each scenarios
Calculated Failure
S.No Scenario Description Acceptance Criteria
Frequency
18 MT Road tanker 1.80E-08 Negligible

1 Bleve 21 MTRoad tanker 1.80E-08 Negligible
10 MT filled Cylinder Truck 1.80E-08 Negligible
Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (100%) 3.13E-06 ALARP
Pipeline rupture To Carousal (100 %) 7.50E-06 ALARP
Pipeline rupture From Bullet to pump (100%) 2.50E-06 ALARP
Heavy Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) 3.75E-05 ALARP
2 Cloud Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck 6.00E-06 ALARP
Dispersion Vapour return header under 150 CFM ALARP
3.00E-04
Compression
Carousal return line( liquid) rupture 1.00E-06 ALARP
Carousal return line ( Vapour) rupture 1.00E-06 ALARP
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) 5.48E-05 ALARP
Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck 6.00E-06 ALARP
Liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet ALARP
3.13E-06
suction
3 Jet Fire Vapour return header under 150 CFM ALARP
1.80E-05
Compression
Carousal return line ( liquid) rupture 1.00E-06 ALARP
ALARP
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) rupture 5.48E-05
Calculated Failure
Frequency
Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (100%) ALARP

3.13E-06
Pipeline rupture To Carousal (100 %) ALARP
7.50E-06
Vapour 1.56E-05
Cloud Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) ALARP
4 Explosion 3.75E-05
(VCE) Liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet ALARP
3.13E-06
suction
1.56E-05
suction
Carousal return line ( liquid ) rupture ALARP
1.00E-05
7.2.12. Risk Acceptance Criteria
In India, there is yet to define Risk acceptance Criteria. However, in IS 15656 – Code of Practice for
Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, the risk criteria adopted in some countries are shown.
Extracts for the same is presented below:
Table 7.9: Risk Criteria
Maximum Tolerable
Negligible Risk
Authority and Application Risk
(per year)
(per year)
VROM, The Netherlands (New) 1.0E-6 1.0E-8
VROM, The Netherlands (existing) 1.0E-5 1.0E-8
HSE, UK (existing-hazardous industry) 1.0E-4 1.0E-6
HSE, UK (New nuclear power station) 1.0E-5 1.0E-6
HSE, UK (Substance transport) 1.0E-4 1.0E-6
HSE, UK (New housing near plants) 3.0E-6 3.0E-7
Hong Kong Government (New plants) 1.0E-5 Not used
7.2.13. ALARP
To achieve the above risk acceptance criteria, ALARP principle was followed while suggesting risk
reduction recommendations.
Figure 7.3: ALARP

As per the risk acceptance criteria, the risk (IR) of Proposed IOCL Khordha LPG Bottling Plant falls
in ALARPregion.
7.2.14. Recommendations
Based on the outcome of the QRA report, it is inferred that present risk levels posed by Khordha
LPG Bottling Plant is in ALARP region. It is suggested to implement “Additional risk control
measures”
To reduce the effect of above scenario, effective additional measures are recommended as
under:
8. Regular NDT, Haydrotesting & painting etc. to be carried out for the unloading lines to avoid
leak and rupture
9. Effective preventive maintenance plan to ensure proper operation of plant
10. Hydrocarbon /Fire detectors integrated to ESD (Emergency Shut Down) to minimize the release
duration to contain LFL contour
11. Area classifications and use of electrical spark proof equipment‟s as per PESO regulations
12. Work permit system to have proper control over works being carried out in the premises
13. Minimize the number trucks in TLD area to reduce the risk, besides, daily checking of safety
features of the Tankers inside the plant and to ensure its preparedness to any hazardous situation.
14. Supervision over road tanker unloading activity
The above scenario shall be used as a base for developing plan for emergency actions.
Some of the important suggested risk control measures are provided below:
 Safety interlocking systems for pumps, compressors, bullets to be verified, counterchecked to

make sure proper shutdown in the event of any failures. Cooling sytem of all LPG pumps
/compressors are interlocked with starting of LPG pumps /compressors
 Gas detectors shall be appropriately located as per norms of OISD-144, to identify the gas leaks
as quick as possible
 Ensure elimination of all the ignition sources by provision of flame proof/intrinsically safe
electrical fittings as per hazardous area classification and also by incorporating operational
controls by prohibiting use of spark generating equipment such as mobile phone/camera.
 All the tools and tackles used in this area shall be spark proof.
 LPG tankers shall be fitted with spark arrestors within plant area.
Operation and maintenance personnel shall be adequately trained and qualified for unloading of
LPG tankers and bottling operation and use of firefightinmg facilities.
Operation checklist in local language and English to be provided near the operational area/unit
 It is suggested to have regular patrolling with critical parameters logging in order to prevent
untoward incidents
 Procedures to carry out safety checks on the LPG tankers at the entry gate shall be developed.
Vehicle speed limit within the plant shall be restricted to the maximum of 10 km/hr.
 Vehicles movement inside plant area to follow presecribed routes and their movement at non-
permitted areas shall be restricted to protect any accidental impact important equipment.
 ABS ( Anti Locking Break System) shall be provided in all vehicles entering plant area
 Temporary stoppers (wheel chock‟s) to the wheeld must be provided for the tankers to prevent
rolling or sudden movement of the tankers.
 Unauthorized entry into the facility shall be prohibited. Entry and exit shall be strictly
controlled.The TREM (Transport Emergency) card shall be available in the LPG tanker so that
in case of any spillage or leakage from the tanker during transit or on road suitable emergency
aid becomes easier
Additionally, HAZOP Study is referenced as Annexure VI.
7.2.15. Reference
 Reference Manual Bevi Risk Assessments version 3.2 , Netherlands

 CPR 18E – Committee for Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands
 A guide to Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis – Centre for Chemical Process Safety
 DNV GL, PHAST-RISK (Safeti), Version 6.7,
 http://www.dnv.com/services/software/products/safeti/safeti/index.asp
 Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board, “The Buncefield Incident 11 December
2005,The Final Report of the Major Incident Investigation Board”, December 2008
 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, “OGP Risk Assessment Data Directory;
Storage Incident Frequencies”, Report No. 434-3, March 2010.
 Census 2011
CHAPTER 8: PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 PROJECT BENEFITS
The Proposed project will have indirect positive impact on surrounding area which is as mentioned
below:
 Plant will be set up on barren land; hence no displacement of people is required.
 Substantial Socio-economic benefits.
 Good Techno-commercial viability.
 Around the project site semi-skilled and unskilled workmen are expected to be available from
local population in these areas to meet the manpower requirement during construction and
Operational phase.
 There will be employment opportunity for local people during construction and operation phase.
 Infrastructural facilities will be improved due to the project.
 Critical analyses of the existing socio-economic profile of the area indicate that the impact of the
Project is expected to be of varying nature. The following are the impacts predicted.
 Secondary employment will be generated thereby benefiting locals.
 Project will have substantial benefits in savings of transportation cost
 Thus a significant benefit to the socio-economic environment is likely to be created due to the
project.
8.2 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
The project will improve supply position of LPG in Odisha State.
 Maintain continuity of LPG gas cylinder supply to the consumers through distributors.
 Increase the days cover for LPG storage.
 Safety measures for hazard detection and prevention system will be installed as per OISD-
144/OISD-150.
 By adding 3x600 MT Mounded Bullets, risk profile of the existing plant will not be enhanced.
 Discourage deforestation and reduce the use of fire wood and fossil fuels.
Establishment of large developmental projects improve the availability of the physical infrastructures
like approach roads, drainage, communication and transportation facilities etc.
8.3 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Proposed IOCL Khordha LPG Plant shall take up some community welfare activities under
Corporate Social Responsibility and also improve the social infrastructures like Sanitation, Education
and health care system etc. or as recommended by District Authorities.
8.4 EMPLOYMENT POTENTIAL
The project shall provide employment potential under unskilled, semi-skilled and skilled categories.
The employment potential shall increase with the start of construction activities, reach a peak during
construction phase and then reduce with completion of construction activities. During operation
phase also there will be employment opportunities, mainly in service sector, although its magnitude
will be much less.
The direct employment opportunities with IOCL are extremely limited and the opportunities exist
mainly with the contractors and sub-contractors. These agencies will be persuaded to provide the
jobs to local persons on a preferential basis wherever feasible.
The total employment potential of plant is 80 people that include contract labours and even security
personnels.
8.5 CSR AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
IOCL not only carries out business but also understands the obligations towards the society. The unit
is aware of the obligations towards the society and to fulfill the social obligations unit will employ
semi-skilled and unskilled labor from the nearby villages for the proposed project as far as possible.
Unit will also try to generate maximum indirect employment in the nearby villages by appointing
local contractors during construction phase as well as during operation phase. The Project
Proponents will contribute reasonably as part of their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) will
carry out various activities in nearby villages.
Moreover, unit has planned to carry out various activities for the up-liftment of poor people, welfare
of women and labors, education of poor students as part of CSR in the nearby villages and therefore,
during and after construction phase of the project, unit will spend more than what is required as per
statutory norms every year towards CSR activities. The various CSR activities planned at present by
the unit is described in Table -8.1
Table 8.1 : CSR activities 2018-2019
Sl Amount
CSR Details
No (Lacs)
Construction of a public toilet at Sergarh Chhak on NH-16
1 17.00
of Balasore.
Construction of Toilet blocks, Installation of street light
2 20.94
and bore well .
Construction of Community Hall at Village Nalam, Dist
3 25.00
Angul
construction of classroom and provision of computers at
Baramkela T.O.U.P School, Baramkela, Bargarh (ii)
Construction of classrooms at Nileswar U.G.U.P School,
Nileswar , Bargarh (iii) Construction of boundary wall and
4 60.00
toilet blocks for both boys and girls students at Tumgaon
Project U.G.U.P School, Tumgaon, Bargarh (iv)
Construction of classrooms at Govt. High school, Remta,
Bargarh, Dist: Bargarh.
Construction of Public liabrary at Mohadadhi Mahabir
5 35.00
Club, Puri, Dist: Puri
Construction of toilet block, renovation and painting of
boundary wall & classrooms, provision of grill,
6 20.63
modification of entrance gate etc in Baniasahi Primary
school, Deogarh of Deogarh District,
completion of stage with Green room and sanitation facility
7 in Banibilas Govt. U.P. [M.E]School, Nagenpali, PO: Tora, 25.00
P.S: Bargarh, Dist: Bargarh
Provision of additional street lights & Drinking water
8 20.00
facilities in village : Tilapada in Mayurbhanj district
Drinking water facilities and street lights in village:
9 Guntaput, Block: Semiliguda, Dist: Koraput , LWE 30.00
affected district.
Provision of Drinking water facilities (Borewell) and street
10 lights in the road from village: Kuradhmall to Village 40.0
Kaipadar, Tehsil: Khurdha Dist: Khurdha.
Construction of Community hall near panchayat office for
11 30.00
the village: Kaipadar, Dist: Khurdha.
Construction of Boundary wall and renovation of of the UP
12 school at Village: Deulatangi, Kaipadar Panchayat. Dist.: 20.00
Khurdha
Construction of Community hall for the village:
13 20.00
Somnathpur, Dist: Khurdha.
8.6 DIRECT REVENUE EARNING TO THE NATIONAL AND STATE EXCHEQUER
This project will contribute additional revenue to the Central and State exchequer in the form of
excise duty, income tax, state sales tax or GST, tax for interstate movement, corporate taxes etc.
Indirect contribution to the Central and State exchequer will be there due to Income by way of
registration of trucks, payment of road tax, income tax from individual as well as taxes from
associated units. Thus, the proposed project will help the Government by paying different taxes from
time to time, which is a part of revenue and thus, will help in developing the area.
8.7 OTHER TANGIBLE BENEFITS
Both tangible and non-tangible benefits will result from this activity and many of those are described
above. Apart from direct employment, many other benefits will accrue like
 Erosion control by nalla training, terracing and bunding
 Flood control by rain-water arresting, and harvesting
 Aesthetics improvement by general greening with emphasis on biodiversity
 Developed economy strengthens democratic set-up.
 Developed economy brings with it literacy and healthful living
 Improved safety-security in surrounding with better Law and Order
 Symbiosis and sustainable development will be the ultimate objective
CHAPTER 9: ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Not recommended at scoping stage .
CHAPTER 10 - ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
10.1. INTRODUCTION
The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) provides an essential link between predicted impacts
and mitigation measures during implementation and operational activities. EMP outlines the
mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during project implementation and
operation to avoid or mitigate adverse environmental impacts, and the actions needed to implement
these measures.
The likely impacts on various components of environment due to the project during developmental
activities have been identified and measures for their mitigation are suggested.
The EMP lists all the requirements to ensure effective mitigation of every potential biophysical and
socio-economic impact identified in the EIA. For each attribute, or operation, which could otherwise
give rise to impact, the following information is presented:
 A comprehensive listing of the mitigation measures
 Parameters that will be monitored to ensure effective implementation of the action
 Timing for implementation of the action to ensure that the objectives of mitigation are fully met
The EMP comprises a series of components covering direct mitigation and environmental
monitoring, an outline waste management plan and a project site restoration plan. Therefore,
environmental management plan has been prepared for each of the above developmental activities.
10.2 EMP DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Environmental pollution during construction stage will be limited and for a temporary period during
the construction activity. Construction shall be planned in such a way that excavated material shall
be disposed safely. The manpower required for these activities shall preferably be employed from
nearby villages so that avenues of employment will be open to local people.
Directly or indirectly all the environmental components get affected due to the construction activity.
The following environmental protection and enhancement measures are suggested for
implementation by the contractor or the authority during the construction as applicable.
10.2.1. Air Environment
During the construction phase, gaseous emissions are expected from the heavy machineries deployed
for construction. All other emission sources are intermittent. Though the gaseous emissions are not
expected to contribute significantly to the ambient air quality, some generic measures to reduce
fugitive and gaseous pollutants emissions during construction phase from point area and line sources
shall include the following:
 All equipment used during construction shall have valid PUC certitifcate.
 The storage and handling of soil, sub-soils, top-soils and materials will be carefully managed to
minimize the risk of wind blown material and dust
 To avoid generation of air borne dust, water sprinkling shall be done.
 There will be no on-site burning of any waste arising from any construction activities
 All vehicles delivering construction materials or removing soil will be covered to prevent escape
of dust
 Engines and exhaust systems of all vehicle and equipment will be maintained so that exhaust
emissions do not exceed statutory limits and that all vehicles and equipment are maintained in
accordance with manufactures‟ manuals. Periodic monitoring of this shall be undertaken to
ensure compliance
 Exhausts of other equipment used for construction (e.g. generators) will be positioned at a
sufficient height to ensure dispersal of exhaust emissions and meet the standards set by CPCB.
10.2.2. Noise Environment
The following environmental management measures are recommended to mitigate adverse impacts
on noise environment during construction phase:
 Earth movers and construction machinery with low noise levels shall be used
 Periodic maintenance of construction machinery and transportation vehicles shall be undertaken
 Onsite workers shall be provided with noise protection devices such as ear plugs/ muffs wherever
necessary
 Periodic monitoring for the noise levels within the project site shall be undertaken to ensure
compliance per OSPCB set standards
10.2.3. Water Environment
Drinking water requirements during the construction phase by the contractors shall be met from
proposed borewells on site. Construction labourers shall be provided with adequate quantity of
drinking water of potable quality.
Sufficient and appropriate sanitary facilities shall be provided in order to maintain hygienic
conditions in the camps of construction labourers. The wastes, such as, sanitary wastes shall be
treated in STP.
The solid waste generated shall be collected and disposed in an appropriate manner either at a
landfill site or used as compost to be used in lawns/gardening purpose.
10.2.4. Land Environment
 On completion of construction works all temporary structures, surplus materials and wastes shall
be completely removed. Dumping of construction waste on agricultural land will be prohibited
and used appropriately.
 The solid wastes such as paints, lubricants, oil or any other non-biodegradable wastes that have
leachable constituents will be disposed to authorized recyclers.
 A waste management plan shall be prepared before the commissioning, implemented and
monitored. In areas, where soil quality for natural vegetation is of critical concern, loosening of
soil in such areas will be done to mitigate soil compaction caused due to operation of heavy
machinery.
10.2.5. Biological Environment
The region does not have dense vegetation and landuse is dominated by agriculture activities.
Following environemtnal managemenr measures are recommended to mitigate adverse impacts on
biological environment during construction phase:
 Plantation will be commenced at the time when site clearing will be undertaken.
 Number of trees will be replanted against the trees removed from site.
 Native species will be preferred for plantation in addition to beautification plants/species.
10.2.6. Socio-economic Environment
Given that the project and related developments like construction camps will not be dependent on
local resources (power, water), during both construction and operations, the only likely impact on
infrastructure would be on the roads, especially NH 5 and Kaipadar Road during the construction
phase. Considering the high traffic emanating during construction phase an effective traffic
management scheme will be put in place to avoid congestion on the nearby and local roads.Local
persons will get employment during Construction phase.
10.2.7. Health and Safety
 The movement of heavy equipment will be undertaken with proper precaution to prevent any
accidents on the road. Occupational risk shall be minimized at the project site through
implementation of a full proof safety system. Speed limit set for movement of vehicles with 20
km/hr on village roads to reduce risks of accidents or injuries.
 Safety training shall be provided to all construction workers on operation of equipment. Security
shall also be extended during non-working hours to ensure there is controlled access to the
machinery and equipment.
 The contractors shall also be vigilant to detect workers showing symptoms of communicable
diseases. Health check up of the contract labors shall be done/ recorded at times. All illness and
incidents shall be reported and recorded.
10.3. EMP DURING OPERATION PHASE
The impacts during the operation phase on the environment would be basically of permanent nature
and are expected to last long. Environment protection measures/ precautions shall be adopted to
minimize the impacts due to operation of plant and this includes all environmental and socio-
economic mitigative measures as proposed and discussed below:
1. Solid Waste Management
2. Air Pollution Control Measure
3. Water Pollution Control Measure
4. Noise Pollution Control Measure
5. Greenery Development
6. Corporate Environmental Responsibility
7. Occupational safety and health
8. Emergency Preparedness (Disaster management Plan)
9. Audit
The different tasks under Environmental Management Plan (EMP) are furnished in Fig. – 9.1.
10.3.1. Solid Waste Management
 Practically, no Solid Waste shall be generated from operation of proposed Mounded Bullets.
 Used oil, grease and empty drums shall be disposed of through registered vendors as per
Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016
10.3.2. Air Environment
 Ambient air quality with respect to PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, H2S, CO and HC monitoring shall be
continued in the impact zone as per regulations.
 To minimize occupational exposure/hazards, the present practice of using personal protective
equipment e.g. helmets, safety (gas) mask/safety dress, safety harness for working at heights,
safety shoes, safety goggles, low temperature hand gloves & shock resistant hand gloves etc. be
ensured for workers engaged in operation of process units within the facility complex
 Stacks of adequate height (As per CPCB norms) for DG Sets to ensure adequate dispersal of
pollutants will be provided.
 Waste Lube oil will not be incinerated and will be sold to MoEFCC/OSPCB authorised waste oil
recyclers.
 All access roads (internal as well as external) to be used by the project authorities will be paved
(either with WBM, concrete or bitumen) to suppress the dust generation along the roads.
10.3.3. Water Pollution Mitigative Measure
Wastewater Management philosophy is based on following:

 The wastewater management philosophy is based on “Minimum Discharge” concept. Sewage
generated will be disposed through septic tanks & soakpits. Washing water generated from
cylinder washing will be treated and reused for plantation.
 Separate storm water drainage system is provided at the facility. The non-contaminated rain
water is discharged directly into rain water harvesting pit within the proposed facility.
 Waste water generated during mock firedrills (only once in a month) is passed through vapour
trap and discharged into natural drainage system.
 During rainy season, the rain water is discharged through properly designed storm water drain
after passing through vapour trap.
10.3.4. Noise Pollution Control
The following noise abatement measures are practiced for the proposed project:
 The equipment, which is the source of noise, have built-in type noise control abatement technology.
 A greenery will be developed around plant boundary and other strategic locations to reduce
noise pollution.
10.3.5. Greenery Development
Greenery will be developed on more than 12 acres (about 37.5 % of the total area) around the plant
in the vacant land space to check the fugitive dust emission. Following trees will be planted in and
around proposed
Table 10.1: Details of greenbelt plantation
S.No List of tree saplings Nos

1 Mango 225
2 Mehagini 275
3 Deuedar 700
4 Neem 256
5 Sal 330
6 Jhau 700
7 Bel 160
8 Radhachura 200
9 Coconut Palm 657
10 Kadamba Tree 256
11 Jackfruit tree 269
Total 4028
10.3.6. Corporate Environmental Responsibility
In order to mitigate the impacts likely to arise out of the proposed project and also to maintain good
will of local people, steps will be taken for improving the social environment. Necessary social
welfare measures by the industry shall be undertaken in gaining public confidence and to meet local
area development requirement. The following measures are suggested:
 IOCL shall continue to undertake social welfare programs for the betterment of the Quality of
Life of villages around in collaboration with the local bodies
 Some basic amenities, viz. education, safe drinking water supply to the nearby villages may be
taken up
 Regular medical checkup shall be continued at times in the villages around the facility Focus
shall be on to educate villagers regarding safety measure provided in the plant
10.3.7. Occupational Safety and Health
IOCL has the highest concern and commitment for protecting the Health and Safety of all
employees, contractors, customers and the communities in which IOCL operates and for
conservation of the Environment. IOCL comply with all Statutory Regulations and may even go
beyond these for the benefit of our environment. IOCL consider Health, Safety and Environmental
aspects are an integral part of IOCL‟s business planning and operation processes. Health and Safety
Policy of IOCL is presented Figure 10.1.
Figure 9.1: Health, Safety and Environmental Policy
10.3.8. Emergency Preparedness (Disaster Management Plan)
Emergency scenario may arise due to the accidental release of hazardous chemicals. A well-
formulated DMP is conceived for combating emergency scenarios. The details of the DMP under
condition of emergency are already discussed in a separate DMP.
Regular and intensive awareness campaigns will be made within the staff members of IOCL and the
nearby areas. To ensure appropriate combating of emergency scenarios, IOCL will arrange declared
and un-declared Mock Drills with different scenarios to check the effectiveness and staff members‟
alertness about the Disaster Management Program
10.3.9. Audit
An audit is a retrospective look at an existing operation to see how successfully the environmental
issues are being addressed. It helps to safeguard the environment, by assisting with and
substantiating compliance with local, regional and national laws and regulations, and with company
policy and standards.
The audit procedure involves gathering relevant background and environmental data, reports and
programme details. An inspection checklist is generally used during the site inspection by the audit
team. This team may be either internal or external, depending on the objectives of the exercise.
An environmental audit gives an overall view of the company's mechanisms and their effectiveness
in environmental control, as well as regulatory compliance.
Management systems auditing (full environmental auditing) covers such issues as:
- Lines of responsibility for environmental controls;

- Resources allocated; and
- Effectiveness of security and protection measures.
In addition to regulatory compliance and management system auditing, specific technical audits of
energy consumption, waste and pollution sources, and site contamination are possible. Each
technique has its own application and the methodology is described in operations manuals.
Regulatory compliance covers issues such as establishing the actual level of environmental
discharges; site contamination; and accidents, etc.
Waste and pollution audits can pinpoint exactly where in a process most of the wastes originate
and why they are allowed to be released.
Energy audits seek to investigate the pattern of energy consumption within a company and to
propose cost-effective conservation measures.
Both waste and energy audits often lead to substantial cost savings within a company by identifying
where excessive wastage occurs.
Site audits try to document the state of soil contamination, and perhaps also groundwater
contamination. This may have an economic payback in identifying the practices that led to the
contamination. Remedial clean-up measures being notoriously expensive, such audits may result in
improved operating procedures, thereby avoiding further expenditure during the eventual site closure
phase.
The auditing process should ensure that the monitoring programme adequately measures the true
nature and extent of all contaminated discharges to water and air, whether chemical or physical.
10.4. RAIN WATER HARVESTING

Rain Water Harvesting will be promoted
10.5. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Completed and proposed CSR activities by IOCL are shown in the following table
Sl Amount
CSR Details
No (Lacs)
Construction of a public toilet at Sergarh Chhak on NH-16
1 17.00
of Balasore.
Construction of Toilet blocks, Installation of street light
2 20.94
and bore well .
Construction of Community Hall at Village Nalam, Dist
3 25.00
Angul
construction of classroom and provision of computers at
Baramkela T.O.U.P School, Baramkela, Bargarh (ii)
Construction of classrooms at Nileswar U.G.U.P School,
Nileswar , Bargarh (iii) Construction of boundary wall and
4 60.00
toilet blocks for both boys and girls students at Tumgaon
Project U.G.U.P School, Tumgaon, Bargarh (iv)
Construction of classrooms at Govt. High school, Remta,
Bargarh, Dist: Bargarh.
Construction of Public liabrary at Mohadadhi Mahabir
5 35.00
Club, Puri, Dist: Puri
Construction of toilet block, renovation and painting of
boundary wall & classrooms, provision of grill,
6 20.63
modification of entrance gate etc in Baniasahi Primary
school, Deogarh of Deogarh District,
Completion of stage with Green room and sanitation
7 facility in Banibilas Govt. U.P. [M.E]School, Nagenpali, 25.00
PO: Tora, P.S: Bargarh, Dist: Bargarh
Provision of additional street lights & Drinking water
8 20.00
facilities in village : Tilapada in Mayurbhanj district
Drinking water facilities and street lights in village:
9 Guntaput, Block: Semiliguda, Dist: Koraput , LWE 30.00
affected district.
Provision of Drinking water facilities (Borewell) and street
10 lights in the road from village: Kuradhmall to Village 40.0
Kaipadar, Tehsil: Khurdha Dist: Khurdha.
Sl Amount
CSR Details
No (Lacs)
Construction of Community hall near panchayat office for
11 30.00
the village: Kaipadar, Dist: Khurdha.
Construction of Boundary wall and renovation of of the UP
12 school at Village: Deulatangi, Kaipadar Panchayat. Dist.: 20.00
Khurdha
Construction of Community hall for the village:
13 20.00
Somnathpur, Dist: Khurdha.
CHAPTER 11. DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED
11.1. CONSULTANTS ENGAGED
This EIA report is prepared on behalf of the proponents, taking inputs from proponent‟s office staff,
their R and D wing, Architects, Project Management Professionals etc. by Environmental
Consultants M/s. Ultra-Tech (Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory), Thane.
M/s Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory:
Ultra-Tech (Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory) not only gives environmental solutions for
sustainable development, but make sure that they are economically feasible. With innovative ideas
and impact mitigation measures offered, make them distinguished in environmental consulting
business. The completion in record time is the key feature of Ultra-Tech. A team of more than
hundred environmental brigadiers consists of engineers, experts, ecologists, hydrologists, geologists,
socio-economic experts, solid waste and hazard waste experts apart from environmental media
sampling and monitoring experts and management experts , strive hard to serve the clients with up to
mark and best services.
Ultra-Tech offers environmental consultancy services to assist its clients to obtain environmental
clearance for their large buildings, construction, CRZ, SEZ, high rise buildings, township projects
and industries covering sugar and distilleries from respective authorities.
Ultra-Tech also provide STP/ETP/WTP project consultancy on turn-key basis apart from Operation
and Maintenance of these projects on annual contract basis. Also, having MoEF approved
environmental laboratory, Ultra-Tech provide laboratory services for monitoring and analysis of
various environmental media like air, water, waste water, stack, noise and meteorological data to its
clients all over India and abroad.
The EIA team involved for the proposed EIA Report is as mentioned in Table 11.1.
Table 11.1: EIA Team
SN Name of the expert Area of functional Expert(NABET Accredited)

1 Mr. Timir Shah EIA Coordinator (Upto 28.02.2018)
2 Mr.Ramsushil Mishra EIA Coordinator from 01-05-2018
2 Mr. Timir Shah Air Pollution
3 Mr. Timir Shah Water Pollution
5 Ms. Archana Sadashiva Solid Hazardous Waste
6 Ms. T. K Ghosh Ecology and Biodiversity
8 Mr. Yogesh Raskar Socio Economic
9 Mr.Debasish Sengupta Team Members
10 Mrs. Pamela Chowdhury Team Members
Functional area experts and assistance to FAE involved in the EIA study for “M/s.Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limited” is as shown in Table 11.2:
Table11.2: EIA Coordinator and Functional Area Experts Involved in the EIA
Name Name Of Name Of Functional Area Experts Involved

S.N Name Of
Of Client EIA Signature
. Project FA Name/s Signature
Sector Coordinator
1. Schedule Proposed M/s. BharatMr.Timir AP Mr.Shekha
6 (b) Coastal Petroleum Shah r Manohar
Category Oil Corporation (Upto Tamhane
„B‟ Storage Limited 28.02.2018) Associate:
Terminal
Mr.Debasish
at
Krishnap Sengupta
atnam WP Mr.Shekha
Port, r Manohar
SPSR Tamhane
Nellore
District, Associate:
AP by Mr.Debasish
M/s Sengupta
Bharat
Petroleu EB Dr. T. K.
m Ghosh
Corporat Mr. SE
ion Mr.
Ramsushil
Limited Yogesh
Mishra
Raskar
(From 01-05-
2018) SHW Ms.
Archana
Sadashiva
LU
Mr.
Yogesh
Raskar
RH
Ms.
Ashwini
Ganvir
Mr.
Debasish
Sengupta
Team
Members
Mrs.
Pamela
Chowdhur
y
11.2 LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS
ACCREDITATION
NAME OF LABORATORY SCOPE OF SERVICES
STATUS
Monitoring and Analysis of:
 Ambient Air Monitoring
M/s. Ultra-Tech
 GroundWater(Analysis) Accredited by NABL
Environmental Consultancy
 Surface Water(Analysis) Valid upto 23.04.2019
and Laboratory, Thane
 Soil quality(Analysis)
 Noise monitoring
Head office: Unit 224, 225, 226, Jai Commercial Complex, Eastern Express highway, opp Cadbury factory, Khopat,
Thane (W)- 400601; Ph : +91-22-25342776/ 25380195 / 25331438 Fax : +91-22-25429650 Email : sales@ultratech.in
Laboratory : G. V. Brothers building, Bata Compound, Khopat, Near Flower Valley, Thane (W)-400601;
Tel: +91 22 2547 49 07/+91 22 2547 62 17 Email: lab@ultratech.in
TEST REPORT
Issued to: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Type of Sample Ambient Air
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Dalaiput
A/2, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar - 751024 Location Code A6
Project Site: LPG Bottling Plant Khordha, Somanathpur, Issue Date 06/02/2018
Khordha, Odisha
Sample Collected By : ULTRA-TECH Sampling Duration 24 hours
Parameters
Date of Sampling Sample Lab Non-
Total
code PM10 PM 2.5 SO2 NO2 CO* Methane Methane
VOC
Hydeocarbon
From To µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 mg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3 µg/m3
3/11/2017 4/11/2017 GA/17(11) -06 128.3 57.5 25 44 0.352 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
131.1 53.5 26 43 0.389 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
6/11/2017 7/11/2017 GA/17(11) -14
133.4 57.7 28.9 40 0.295 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/11/2017 11/11/2017 GA/17(11) -22
137.8 58.6 27.5 50.5 0.284 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
14/11/2017 15/11/2017 GA/17(11) -30
141.9 78.4 30.1 52.6 0.319 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/11/2017 19/11/2017 GA/17(11) -38
136.7 73.22 32.5 58 0.347 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/11/2017 23/11/2017 GA/17(11) -45
141.3 54.81 33 58 0.291 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
26/11/2017 27/11/2017 GA/17(11) -54
139.7 61.9 30.5 55 0.275 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/11/2017 30/11/2017 GA/17(11) -61
133.3 62.3 18.5 39 0.214 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/12/2017 03/12/2017 GA/17(12) -06
131.1 63.4 20.5 42 0.237 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/12/2017 06/12/2017 GA/17(12) -14
124 67.97 22 45 0.245 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/12/2017 11/12/2017 GA/17(12) -22
127 75.1 24 46 0.259 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/12/2017 14/12/2017 GA/17(12) -30
128.8 78.7 25 45 0.301 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/12/2017 18/12/2017 GA/17(12) -38
127.3 71.1 21.5 42 0.241 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/12/2017 22/12/2017 GA/17(12) -45
133.2 89.5 27 50.5 0.278 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/12/2017 25/12/2017 GA/17(12) -53
134.8 64.4 29 54 0.268 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/12/2017 29/12/2017 GA/17(12) -61
153.6 77.4 25 46 0.320 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
03/01/2018 04/01/2018 GA/17(01) -06
142.76 68.7 24 40 0.319 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
07/01/2018 08/01/2018 GA/17(01) -14
147.2 61.9 22 43 0.320 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/01/2018 11/01/2018 GA/17(01) -22
154.1 72.1 28 44 0.351 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
14/01/2018 15/01/2018 GA/17(01) -30
160.1 70.3 22 45 0.301 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/01/2018 18/01/2018 GA/17(01) -38
148.4 76.6 26 48 0.297 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
20/01/2018 21/01/2018 GA/17(01) -45
149.4 89 20.5 39.5 0.251 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/01/2018 26/01/2018 GA/17(01) -53
153.5 74.1 22.5 41.5 0.247 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/01/2018 30/01/2018 GA/17(01) -61
The results relate only to the parameters tested; * : Sampling Period 1Hr
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
Authorized Signatory
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Dhaulimuhan
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
1/11/2017 2/11/2017 GA/17(11) -04 169.9 74.5 37 48.5 0.293 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
186.2 71.81 39 50.5 0.275 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
5/11/2017 6/11/2017 GA/17(11) -12
187.5 85.2 38.5 52 0.316 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
9/11/2017 10/11/2017 GA/17(11) -20
180.7 82.5 36.5 50.5 0.259 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/11/2017 14/11/2017 GA/17(11) -28
184.4 66.3 39.9 52 0.326 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/11/2017 17/11/2017 GA/17(11) -36
177.9 71.1 37 53 0.389 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/11/2017 22/11/2017 GA/17(11) -43
182.4 75.5 40 62 0.258 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/11/2017 26/11/2017 GA/17(11) -51
177 81.4 38.5 60.5 0.310 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/11/2017 29/11/2017 GA/17(11) -59
161.9 65.97 32.5 45.6 0.243 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
01/12/2017 02/12/2017 GA/17(12) -04
164 74.8 30.8 46 0.295 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
06/12/2017 07/12/2017 GA/17(12) -12
171.7 90.9 34 51 0.285 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/12/2017 10/12/2017 GA/17(12) -20
176.7 61.51 35.8 49.9 0.261 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/12/2017 13/12/2017 GA/17(12) -28
180.3 89.96 36 52 0.324 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/12/2017 19/12/2017 GA/17(12) -36
171.5 93.11 38 51 0.343 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/12/2017 23/12/2017 GA/17(12) -43
155.8 90.9 33 49.8 0.315 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/12/2017 26/12/2017 GA/17(12) -51
187.8 92.5 36.9 51.9 0.301 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/12/2017 30/12/2017 GA/17(12) -59
195.6 82 35.8 52 0.323 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/01/2018 03/01/2018 GA/17(01) -04
203.7 78.81 36.2 56 0.219 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/01/2018 06/01/2018 GA/17(01) -12
210.4 80.06 38 54.8 0.210 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/01/2018 10/01/2018 GA/17(01) -20
210.1 88.54 39.5 56 0.270 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/01/2018 13/01/2018 GA/17(01) -28
197.7 79.33 40.2 52 0.310 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/01/2018 17/01/2018 GA/17(01) -36
201.1 70.71 33.8 51 0.310 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
19/01/2018 20/01/2018 GA/17(01) -43
203.5 84.94 36.4 50.9 0.381 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/01/2018 25/01/2018 GA/17(01) -51
201.6 72.56 39.8 53.5 0.352 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/01/2018 29/01/2018 GA/17(01) -59
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Project site
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
1/11/2017 2/11/2017 GA/17(11) -01 206.6 83.9 45 67.5 0.330 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
207.4 89.9 42 66.5 0.299 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
5/11/2017 6/11/2017 GA/17(11) -09
204.9 88.9 40 62.5 0.389 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
9/11/2017 10/11/2017 GA/17(11) -17
219.3 87.4 48.5 63 0.375 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/11/2017 14/11/2017 GA/17(11) -25
255.8 80.95 51 72 0.322 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/11/2017 17/11/2017 GA/17(11) -33
220.1 73.93 46 70.5 0.269 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/11/2017 22/11/2017 GA/17(11) -40
198.3 63.9 42.5 62.5 0.270 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/11/2017 26/11/2017 GA/17(11) -48
193.1 81.2 40.9 60.5 0.288 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/11/2017 29/11/2017 GA/17(11) -56
179.5 87 39.5 52.5 0.310 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
01/12/2017 02/12/2017 GA/17(12) -01
173.5 72.2 40 55 0.290 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
06/12/2017 07/12/2017 GA/17(12) -09
165.2 64.3 42 57.8 0.342 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/12/2017 10/12/2017 GA/17(12) -17
166.7 68.2 44.1 59.9 0.335 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/12/2017 13/12/2017 GA/17(12) -25
158.4 52.3 41.5 61.5 0.232 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/12/2017 19/12/2017 GA/17(12) -33
178.1 87.9 38.5 57.9 0.261 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/12/2017 23/12/2017 GA/17(12) -40
179.1 79.82 40.2 56.5 0.294 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/12/2017 26/12/2017 GA/17(12) -48
188.8 80.3 39 61.5 0.288 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/12/2017 30/12/2017 GA/17(12) -56
185.6 94.9 38 56 0.378 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/01/2018 03/01/2018 GA/17(01) -01
182.2 62.3 39 59 0.216 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/01/2018 06/01/2018 GA/17(01) -09
168.6 87.9 41 63 0.287 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/01/2018 10/01/2018 GA/17(01) -17
165.6 90.6 40 56.5 0.189 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/01/2018 13/01/2018 GA/17(01) -25
160.2 90.75 42 63.5 0.117 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/01/2018 17/01/2018 GA/17(01) -33
199.9 95.6 39.5 61.5 0.192 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
19/01/2018 20/01/2018 GA/17(01) -40
202.2 113.4 40.5 60 0.117 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/01/2018 25/01/2018 GA/17(01) -48
206.7 119.7 38 58 0.207 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/01/2018 29/01/2018 GA/17(01) -56
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Managobindapur
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
1/11/2017 2/11/2017 GA/17(11) -02 268 79.1 48 60 0.244 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
249.6 114.6 45 52 0.210 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
5/11/2017 6/11/2017 GA/17(11) -10
229.4 81.5 47 61 0.316 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
9/11/2017 10/11/2017 GA/17(11) -18
227.6 101.9 49 65 0.316 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/11/2017 14/11/2017 GA/17(11) -26
126.7 116.3 40 60 0.326 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/11/2017 17/11/2017 GA/17(11) -34
143.07 96.95 56 75 0.378 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/11/2017 22/11/2017 GA/17(11) -41
175.6 105.4 51 77 0.331 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/11/2017 26/11/2017 GA/17(11) -49
190.6 108.4 54 78 0.276 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/11/2017 29/11/2017 GA/17(11) -57
221.8 102.5 51 65 0.285 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
01/12/2017 02/12/2017 GA/17(12) -02
228 124.5 54 66 0.392 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
06/12/2017 07/12/2017 GA/17(12) -10
239.6 113.4 50 61 0.385 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/12/2017 10/12/2017 GA/17(12) -18
239.7 128.8 52 71 0.212 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/12/2017 13/12/2017 GA/17(12) -26
243.4 107.7 54 73 0.207 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/12/2017 19/12/2017 GA/17(12) -34
241.8 124.3 50.5 74.5 0.219 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/12/2017 23/12/2017 GA/17(12) -41
262.3 134.7 56 80.5 0.360 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/12/2017 26/12/2017 GA/17(12) -49
243.9 7071 62 82 0.370 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/12/2017 30/12/2017 GA/17(12) -57
251.7 114.6 48 67.9 0.317 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
01/01/2018 02/01/2018 GA/17(01) -02
248.9 101.13 50 74.6 0.320 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/01/2018 06/01/2018 GA/17(01) -10
240.7 108.42 56 84.5 0.319 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/01/2018 10/01/2018 GA/17(01) -18
238.9 102.4 62 85 0.295 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/01/2018 13/01/2018 GA/17(01) -26
228.9 133.9 60 82 0.280 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/01/2018 17/01/2018 GA/17(01) -34
220.1 102.9 57 80 0.275 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
19/01/2018 20/01/2018 GA/17(01) -41
214.3 93.8 54 76 0.371 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/01/2018 25/01/2018 GA/17(01) -49
223.2 97.8 56 71 0.394 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/01/2018 29/01/2018 GA/17(01) -57
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Jhinkijhari
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
1/11/2017 2/11/2017 GA/17(11) -03 150.5 92.85 41 54 0.237 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
169.6 109.6 40 56 0.127 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
5/11/2017 6/11/2017 GA/17(11) -11
214 91.5 41.9 58 0.117 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
9/11/2017 10/11/2017 GA/17(11) -19
215.6 72.14 42 60.1 0.293 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/11/2017 14/11/2017 GA/17(11) -27
234.6 166.8 43 56.8 0.197 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/11/2017 17/11/2017 GA/17(11) -35
217.5 124.4 42 51.9 0.217 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/11/2017 22/11/2017 GA/17(11) -43
215.1 100.4 40.8 52 0.318 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/11/2017 26/11/2017 GA/17(11) -50
219 123.72 50 65 0.390 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/11/2017 29/11/2017 GA/17(11) -58
128.4 95.61 37.5 54 0.329 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
01/12/2017 02/12/2017 GA/17(12) -03
119.4 105.6 39.2 56 0.310 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
06/12/2017 07/12/2017 GA/17(12) -11
118.5 144.7 40 57 0.191 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/12/2017 10/12/2017 GA/17(12) -19
124 108.1 43 58.2 0.185 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/12/2017 13/12/2017 GA/17(12) -27
129.6 100.4 44 59.5 0.210 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/12/2017 19/12/2017 GA/17(12) -35
144.6 105 46 61 0.270 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/12/2017 23/12/2017 GA/17(12) -43
148.9 106.9 47.8 62.5 0.280 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/12/2017 26/12/2017 GA/17(12) -50
151.83 121.2 40 61 0.156 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/12/2017 30/12/2017 GA/17(12) -58
264.6 109.8 54 88 0.232 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/01/2018 03/01/2018 GA/17(01) -03
253.9 95.9 50 80 0.141 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/01/2018 06/01/2018 GA/17(01) -11
256 123 51 78 0.251 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
09/01/2018 10/01/2018 GA/17(01) -19
243 106.3 52.5 76.5 0.290 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
12/01/2018 13/01/2018 GA/17(01) -27
236 105.9 51.5 75.5 0.155 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
16/01/2018 17/01/2018 GA/17(01) -35
228.7 103.13 49 76 0.107 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
19/01/2018 20/01/2018 GA/17(01) -43
218.7 89.84 41 64 0.219 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/01/2018 25/01/2018 GA/17(01) -50
190 89 42 62 0.125 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/01/2018 29/01/2018 GA/17(01) -58
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Taratua
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
3/11/2017 4/11/2017 GA/17(11) -05 100.4 50.6 30 51 0.243 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
105.9 47.7 28 52 0.215 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
6/11/2017 7/11/2017 GA/17(11) -13
104.6 46 26 56 0.209 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/11/2017 11/11/2017 GA/17(11) -21
114.3 52.3 32 61 0.191 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
14/11/2017 15/11/2017 GA/17(11) -29
102 61.1 34 60 0.278 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/11/2017 19/11/2017 GA/17(11) -37
90.4 47.9 28.5 58 0.315 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/11/2017 23/11/2017 GA/17(11) -44
92.1 52.3 30 52 0.320 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
26/11/2017 27/11/2017 GA/17(11) -52
96.2 44.7 26 46 0.290 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/11/2017 30/11/2017 GA/17(11) -60
94 67 31 54 0.241 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/12/2017 03/12/2017 GA/17(12) -05
91.8 48.9 29 50 0.234 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/12/2017 06/12/2017 GA/17(12) -13
92.9 39.75 28 51 0.270 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/12/2017 11/12/2017 GA/17(12) -21
90.5 48.4 34 56 0.210 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/12/2017 14/12/2017 GA/17(12) -29
92 42.3 30 49 0.198 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/12/2017 18/12/2017 GA/17(12) -37
93 54.4 25 42 0.312 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/12/2017 22/12/2017 GA/17(12) -44
95.8 64 23.5 42 0.217 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/12/2017 25/12/2017 GA/17(12) -52
102 61 28 45 0.223 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/12/2017 29/12/2017 GA/17(12) -60
107.1 64.8 29 48.5 0.217 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
03/01/2018 04/01/2018 GA/17(01) -05
100.4 47.02 28.5 48 0.217 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
07/01/2018 08/01/2018 GA/17(01) -13
97.2 48.5 27.5 46 0.215 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/01/2018 11/01/2018 GA/17(01) -21
14/01/2018 15/01/2018 GA/17(01) -29 95.04 51.5 30.5 50.5 0.202 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
97.5 59.8 31 53 0.197 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/01/2018 18/01/2018 GA/17(01) -37
94.9 43.9 30 53 0.248 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
20/01/2018 21/01/2018 GA/17(01) -44
96.2 51.5 36 56 0.262 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/01/2018 26/01/2018 GA/17(01) -52
90.6 43.9 30 49 0.215 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/01/2018 30/01/2018 GA/17(01) -60
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Madhapur
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
3/11/2017 4/11/2017 GA/17(11) -07 111.5 65.3 18.5 38 0.214 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
109.4 64.8 17.5 40 0.261 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
6/11/2017 7/11/2017 GA/17(11) -15
110.2 60.25 19 40 0.217 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/11/2017 11/11/2017 GA/17(11) -23
107.5 58.8 17 38 0.255 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
14/11/2017 15/11/2017 GA/17(11) -31
94.2 60.05 16.5 36 0.271 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/11/2017 19/11/2017 GA/17(11) -39
103.2 70.5 18 37 0.310 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/11/2017 23/11/2017 GA/17(11) -46
98.8 45.2 15 33 0.291 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
26/11/2017 27/11/2017 GA/17(11) -54
103.5 57.3 18.5 35 0.275 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/11/2017 30/11/2017 GA/17(11) -62
103.4 56.1 21 43 0.241 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/12/2017 03/12/2017 GA/17(12) -07
105.4 45.6 22.5 43 0.215 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/12/2017 06/12/2017 GA/17(12) -15
105.5 53.1 20.8 40.5 0.234 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/12/2017 11/12/2017 GA/17(12) -23
106.6 51.5 22.5 43 0.271 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/12/2017 14/12/2017 GA/17(12) -31
104.15 62.8 20.5 44 0.254 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/12/2017 18/12/2017 GA/17(12) -39
102.4 53.9 18 36.5 0.301 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/12/2017 22/12/2017 GA/17(12) -46
109.3 54.8 24 42 0.305 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/12/2017 25/12/2017 GA/17(12) -54
109.4 64.8 24 44 0.290 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/12/2017 29/12/2017 GA/17(12) -62
102.7 42.2 20 42 0.241 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
03/01/2018 04/01/2018 GA/17(01) -07
107.4 61.1 21 40 0.234 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
07/01/2018 08/01/2018 GA/17(01) -15
97.7 41 18 41 0.204 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/01/2018 11/01/2018 GA/17(01) -23
14/01/2018 15/01/2018 GA/17(01) -31 95.4 47.7 19.5 38 0.201 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
96.5 57.5 18 38 0.215 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/01/2018 18/01/2018 GA/17(01) -39
101.1 60.2 18 40.5 0.216 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
20/01/2018 21/01/2018 GA/17(01) -46
102.3 58.8 22 44 0.271 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/01/2018 26/01/2018 GA/17(01) -54
102.5 62.5 23 48 0.285 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/01/2018 30/01/2018 GA/17(01) -62
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Dadhimachhagadia
Khordha, Odisha
Parameters
Total
VOC
Hydeocarbon
3/11/2017 4/11/2017 GA/17(11) -08 95.88 57.7 20.5 41 0.243 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
93.65 52.3 22 45 0.215 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
6/11/2017 7/11/2017 GA/17(11) -16
92 48.1 18 40 0.263 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/11/2017 11/11/2017 GA/17(11) -24
94.5 57.7 22 40.5 0.273 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
14/11/2017 15/11/2017 GA/17(11) -32
96.8 60.7 24 41.5 0.281 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
18/11/2017 19/11/2017 GA/17(11) -39
93.4 52.7 22 46 0.222 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
22/11/2017 23/11/2017 GA/17(11) -47
99 53.1 26 50.5 0.241 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
26/11/2017 27/11/2017 GA/17(11) -55
95.3 56.1 26 52 0.253 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/11/2017 30/11/2017 GA/17(11) -63
101.5 43.9 24 44 0.294 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
02/12/2017 03/12/2017 GA/17(12) -07
102.7 40 24 43 0.263 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
05/12/2017 06/12/2017 GA/17(12) -15
97.3 52.61 22 41 0.217 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/12/2017 11/12/2017 GA/17(12) -23
96.7 50.98 23 43 0.283 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
13/12/2017 14/12/2017 GA/17(12) -31
100.6 57.3 22 41 0.275 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/12/2017 18/12/2017 GA/17(12) -39
102 62.7 24 44 0.278 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
21/12/2017 22/12/2017 GA/17(12) -46
96.1 61.1 18 40 0.213 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
24/12/2017 25/12/2017 GA/17(12) -54
106.3 56.1 22 43 0.208 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
28/12/2017 29/12/2017 GA/17(12) -62
93.8 49.6 20 41 0.241 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
03/01/2018 04/01/2018 GA/17(01) -07
90.2 54.7 18 37 0.281 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
07/01/2018 08/01/2018 GA/17(01) -15
93.9 51 22.5 46 0.213 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
10/01/2018 11/01/2018 GA/17(01) -23
14/01/2018 15/01/2018 GA/17(01) -31 96.61 42.3 22.5 44 0.209 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
94.3 42.2 23 48 0.216 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
17/01/2018 18/01/2018 GA/17(01) -39
98 47.28 26 52 0.274 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
20/01/2018 21/01/2018 GA/17(01) -46
101.2 48.9 29 57 0.264 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
25/01/2018 26/01/2018 GA/17(01) -54
103 43 28 61 0.294 BDL (<1) BDL (<0.1) BDL (<0.01)
29/01/2018 30/01/2018 GA/17(01) -62
-END OF REPORT-
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Issued to: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Sample Particulars Ambient Noise Level Monitoring
A/2, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar - 751024 Location Code N1
Khordha, Odisha
Survey Done By : ULTRA-TECH Type of area Residential
Monitoring 02.01.2018 to 05.01.2018 to 09.01.2018 to 12.01.2018 to 16.01.2018 to 19.01.2018 to 24.01.2018 to 28.01.2018 to

Date 03.01.2018 06.01.2018 10.01.2018 13.01.2018 17.01.2018 20.01.2018 25.01.2018 29.01.2018
Time (In Hrs.) Hourly Leq dB(A)
6.00-7.00 50.4 49.7 49.9 50.4 50.4 49.7 50.4 49.9
7.00-8.00 57.8 57.6 57.8 57.8 57.8 57.6 57.8 57.8
8.00-9.00 57.6 58.8 57.7 57.6 57.6 58.8 57.6 57.7
9.00-10.00 60.8 60.9 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.9 60.8 60.8
10.00-11.00 61.1 63 61.1 61.1 61.1 63 61.1 61.1
11.00-12.00 65.5 66.3 65.6 65.5 65.5 66.3 65.5 65.6
12.00-13.00 64.5 65.9 64.5 64.5 64.5 65.9 64.5 64.5
13.00-14.00 62.4 58.1 62.4 62.4 62.4 58.1 62.4 62.4
14.00-15.00 60.8 61.1 60.5 60.8 60.8 61.1 60.8 60.5
15.00-16.00 63.1 60.8 62.5 63.1 63.1 60.8 63.1 62.5
16.00-17.00 58 61.5 57.7 58 58 61.5 58 57.7
17.00-18.00 60.8 63.5 61.2 60.8 60.8 63.5 60.8 61.2
18.00-19.00 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6
19.00-20.00 59.5 60.3 59.4 59.5 59.5 60.3 59.5 59.4
20.00-21.00 57.3 59.4 57.2 57.3 57.3 59.4 57.3 57.2
21.00-22.00 52.5 54.1 52.4 52.5 52.5 54.1 52.5 52.4
22.00-23.00 48.3 49.8 48.2 48.3 48.3 49.8 48.3 48.2
23.00-0.00 49 51.2 48.2 49 49 51.2 49 48.2
0.00-1.00 46.4 45.9 46.4 46.4 46.4 45.9 46.4 46.4
1.00-2.00 45.6 47.1 45.9 45.6 45.6 47.1 45.6 45.9
2.00-3.00 46.1 49.1 46.2 46.1 46.1 49.1 46.1 46.2
3.00-4.00 46.3 47.8 46.3 46.3 46.3 47.8 46.3 46.3
4.00-5.00 47.7 48.5 47.7 47.7 47.7 48.5 47.7 47.7
5.00-6.00 49.1 48 49.7 49.1 49.1 48 49.1 49.7
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 60.9 61.5 60.8 60.9 60.9 61.5 60.9 60.8
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 47.5 48.7 47.4 47.5 47.5 48.7 47.5 47.4
Day time Limit (06:00 A.M.-10:00 P.M.) 55 Leq
Night Time Limit (10:00 P.M.-06:00 A.M.) 45 Leq
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Managobindapur
Khordha, Odisha

Date 03.01.2018 06.01.2018 10.01.2018 13.01.2018 17.01.2018 20.01.2018 25.01.2018 29.01.2018
6.00-7.00 49.2 56.1 49.2 49.7 49.2 49.2 49.7 56.1
7.00-8.00 56.2 59.4 56.2 57.6 56.2 56.2 57.6 59.4
8.00-9.00 56.2 58.8 56.2 58.8 56.2 56.2 58.8 58.8
9.00-10.00 60.2 60.9 60.2 60.9 60.2 60.2 60.9 60.9
10.00-11.00 59.8 66.5 59.8 63 59.8 59.8 63 66.5
11.00-12.00 63.. 66.3 63.. 66.3 63.. 63.. 66.3 66.3
12.00-13.00 62.3 67.7 62.3 65.9 62.3 62.3 65.9 67.7
13.00-14.00 65 58.1 65 58.1 65 65 58.1 58.1
14.00-15.00 60.5 61.4 60.5 61.1 60.5 60.5 61.1 61.4
15.00-16.00 60.2 60.8 60.2 60.8 60.2 60.2 60.8 60.8
16.00-17.00 57.8 61.9 57.8 61.5 57.8 57.8 61.5 61.9
17.00-18.00 59.2 63.9 59.2 63.5 59.2 59.2 63.5 63.9
18.00-19.00 59.1 60.2 59.1 59.6 59.1 59.1 59.6 60.2
19.00-20.00 58.7 61.1 58.7 60.3 58.7 58.7 60.3 61.1
20.00-21.00 55.3 60.2 55.3 59.4 55.3 55.3 59.4 60.2
21.00-22.00 51.9 54.5 51.9 54.1 51.9 51.9 54.1 54.5
22.00-23.00 48.2 50.9 48.2 49.8 48.2 48.2 49.8 50.9
23.00-0.00 48.5 51.7 48.5 51.2 48.5 48.5 51.2 51.7
0.00-1.00 46.1 51.1 46.1 45.9 46.1 46.1 45.9 51.1
1.00-2.00 45.6 52.1 45.6 47.1 45.6 45.6 47.1 52.1
2.00-3.00 46.1 50.9 46.1 49.1 46.1 46.1 49.1 50.9
3.00-4.00 46.3 53 46.3 47.8 46.3 46.3 47.8 53
4.00-5.00 47.7 49.4 47.7 48.5 47.7 47.7 48.5 49.4
5.00-6.00 47.6 46.9 47.6 48 47.6 47.6 48 46.9
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 60.1 62.5 60.1 61.5 60.1 60.1 61.5 62.5
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 47.1 51.2 47.1 48.7 47.1 47.1 48.7 51.2
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha

Date 03.01.2018 06.01.2018 10.01.2018 13.01.2018 17.01.2018 20.01.2018 25.01.2018 29.01.2018
6.00-7.00 49.6 49.7 49.6 49 49.6 49.7 49.6 49
7.00-8.00 57.4 58.4 57.4 57.4 57.4 58.4 57.4 57.4
8.00-9.00 59.4 58.8 59.4 59.4 59.4 58.8 59.4 59.4
9.00-10.00 60.7 60.9 60.7 60.7 60.7 60.9 60.7 60.7
10.00-11.00 61.8 62.7 61.8 62.7 61.8 62.7 61.8 62.7
11.00-12.00 64.8 64.5 64.8 64.8 64.8 64.5 64.8 64.8
12.00-13.00 65 64.8 65 65 65 64.8 65 65
13.00-14.00 62.5 58.1 62.5 62.7 62.5 58.1 62.5 62.7
14.00-15.00 63.7 58.9 63.7 63.7 63.7 58.9 63.7 63.7
15.00-16.00 62.5 61.5 62.5 62.3 62.5 61.5 62.5 62.3
16.00-17.00 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.6 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.6
17.00-18.00 64.6 63.5 64.6 64.7 64.6 63.5 64.6 64.7
18.00-19.00 60 59.6 60 60 60 59.6 60 60
19.00-20.00 59.3 60.3 59.3 59.3 59.3 60.3 59.3 59.3
20.00-21.00 57.1 59.4 57.1 57.1 57.1 59.4 57.1 57.1
21.00-22.00 54.2 54.1 54.2 54.2 54.2 54.1 54.2 54.2
22.00-23.00 48.8 49.8 48.8 48.6 48.8 49.8 48.8 48.6
23.00-0.00 48 51.2 48 49 48 51.2 48 49
0.00-1.00 46.2 45.9 46.2 46.3 46.2 45.9 46.2 46.3
1.00-2.00 46.3 47.1 46.3 46.3 46.3 47.1 46.3 46.3
2.00-3.00 46.6 47.6 46.6 46.6 46.6 47.6 46.6 46.6
3.00-4.00 46.7 47.3 46.7 46.7 46.7 47.3 46.7 46.7
4.00-5.00 47.4 48.9 47.4 47.2 47.4 48.9 47.4 47.2
5.00-6.00 49.3 48.3 49.3 49.3 49.3 48.3 49.3 49.3
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 61.3 61 61.3 61.4 61.3 61 61.3 61.4
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 47.6 48.5 47.6 47.7 47.6 48.5 47.6 47.7
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha

Date 03.01.2018 06.01.2018 10.01.2018 13.01.2018 17.01.2018 20.01.2018 25.01.2018 29.01.2018
6.00-7.00 49.5 55.1 49.7 49.7 49.5 49.7 49.5 49.7
7.00-8.00 58.5 59.7 58.4 58.4 58.5 58.4 58.5 58.4
8.00-9.00 58.8 59 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8
9.00-10.00 60.9 62 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9
10.00-11.00 62.7 66.5 62.7 62.7 62.7 62.7 62.7 62.7
11.00-12.00 63.6 66.3 64.5 64.5 63.6 64.5 63.6 64.5
12.00-13.00 64.5 66.8 64.8 64.8 64.5 64.8 64.5 64.8
13.00-14.00 56.6 58.8 58.1 58.1 56.6 58.1 56.6 58.1
14.00-15.00 57.4 61.4 58.9 58.9 57.4 58.9 57.4 58.9
15.00-16.00 61.5 60.8 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5
16.00-17.00 61.5 61.9 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5
17.00-18.00 63.5 64.2 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5
18.00-19.00 59.6 60.2 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6
19.00-20.00 58 60.6 60.3 60.3 58 60.3 58 60.3
20.00-21.00 59.4 59.6 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4
21.00-22.00 54.1 54.5 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1
22.00-23.00 49.8 51.2 49.8 49.8 49.8 49.8 49.8 49.8
23.00-0.00 51 49.7 51.2 51.2 51 51.2 51 51.2
0.00-1.00 45.9 49.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9
1.00-2.00 47.1 49.2 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1
2.00-3.00 47.6 50.5 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.6
3.00-4.00 46.9 51.2 47.3 47.3 46.9 47.3 46.9 47.3
4.00-5.00 48.9 52.6 48.9 48.9 48.9 48.9 48.9 48.9
5.00-6.00 48.9 52 48.3 48.3 48.9 48.3 48.9 48.3
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 60.6 62.4 61 61 60.6 61 60.6 61.0
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 48.6 50.9 48.5 48.5 48.6 48.5 48.6 48.5
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Taratua
Khordha, Odisha

Date 04.01.2018 08.01.2018 11.01.2018 15.01.2018 18.01.2018 21.01.2018 26.01.2018 30.01.2018
6.00-7.00 56.3 55.1 56.8 56.3 56.3 55.1 56.3 56.3
7.00-8.00 59 59.7 59 59.4 59 59.7 59 59.4
8.00-9.00 58.8 59 59.1 58.8 58.8 59 58.8 58.8
9.00-10.00 62 62 61.8 62 62 62 62 62
10.00-11.00 66.5 66.5 66.3 66.5 66.5 66.5 66.5 66.5
11.00-12.00 66.3 66.3 66.1 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3
12.00-13.00 67.4 66.8 67.2 67.7 67.4 66.8 67.4 67.7
13.00-14.00 61.2 58.8 61.1 58.8 61.2 58.8 61.2 58.8
14.00-15.00 61.8 61.4 63.2 61.4 61.8 61.4 61.8 61.4
15.00-16.00 60.8 60.8 60.9 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8
16.00-17.00 63.9 61.9 64.2 61.9 63.9 61.9 63.9 61.9
17.00-18.00 63.9 64.2 64 63.9 63.9 64.2 63.9 63.9
18.00-19.00 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2
19.00-20.00 60.8 60.6 61.8 60.8 60.8 60.6 60.8 60.8
20.00-21.00 55.6 59.6 55.8 60.2 55.6 59.6 55.6 60.2
21.00-22.00 56.2 54.5 55.1 54.5 56.2 54.5 56.2 54.5
22.00-23.00 56.6 51.2 56.8 50.9 56.6 51.2 56.6 50.9
23.00-0.00 55 49.7 55 51.7 55 49.7 55 51.7
0.00-1.00 51.9 49.9 51 51.9 51.9 49.9 51.9 51.9
1.00-2.00 53 49.2 53 53 53 49.2 53 53
2.00-3.00 52.2 50.5 52.2 52.2 52.2 50.5 52.2 52.2
3.00-4.00 53 51.2 53.2 53 53 51.2 53 53
4.00-5.00 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6
5.00-6.00 56.3 52 56.5 53 56.3 52 56.3 53
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 62.7 62.4 62.8 62.6 62.7 62.4 62.7 62.6
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 54.2 50.9 54.3 52.4 54.2 50.9 54.2 52.4
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha

Date 04.01.2018 08.01.2018 11.01.2018 15.01.2018 18.01.2018 21.01.2018 26.01.2018 30.01.2018
6.00-7.00 56.1 49.7 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 49.7
7.00-8.00 59.4 57.6 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 57.6
8.00-9.00 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8
9.00-10.00 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9
10.00-11.00 66.5 63 66.5 66.5 66.5 66.5 66.5 63
11.00-12.00 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3 66.3
12.00-13.00 67.7 65.9 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.7 65.9
13.00-14.00 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1 58.1
14.00-15.00 61.4 61.1 61.4 61.4 61.4 61.4 61.4 61.1
15.00-16.00 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8 60.8
16.00-17.00 61.9 61.5 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.5
17.00-18.00 63.9 63.5 63.9 63.9 63.9 63.9 63.9 63.5
18.00-19.00 60.2 59.6 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 59.6
19.00-20.00 61.1 60.3 61.1 61.1 61.1 61.1 61.1 60.3
20.00-21.00 60.2 59.4 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2 59.4
21.00-22.00 54.5 54.1 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.1
22.00-23.00 50.9 49.8 50.9 50.9 50.9 50.9 50.9 49.8
23.00-0.00 51.7 51.2 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.2
0.00-1.00 51.1 45.9 51.1 51.1 51.1 51.1 51.1 45.9
1.00-2.00 52.1 47.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 47.1
2.00-3.00 50.9 49.1 50.9 50.9 50.9 50.9 50.9 49.1
3.00-4.00 53 47.8 53 53 53 53 53 47.8
4.00-5.00 49.4 48.5 49.4 49.4 49.4 49.4 49.4 48.5
5.00-6.00 46.9 48 46.9 46.9 46.9 46.9 46.9 48
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 62.5 61.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 62.5 61.5
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 51.2 48.7 51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2 48.7
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Madhapur
Khordha, Odisha

Date 04.01.2018 08.01.2018 11.01.2018 15.01.2018 18.01.2018 21.01.2018 26.01.2018 30.01.2018
6.00-7.00 49.7 49.7 49.9 49.7 49.7 49.5 49.7 49.9
7.00-8.00 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.4 58.5 58.4 58.4
8.00-9.00 58.8 58.8 59.1 58.8 58.8 58.8 58.8 59.1
9.00-10.00 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9 60.9
10.00-11.00 62.7 62.7 62.9 62.7 62.7 62.7 62.7 62.9
11.00-12.00 64.5 64.5 64.5 64.5 64.5 63.6 64.5 64.5
12.00-13.00 64.8 64.8 64.8 64.8 64.8 64.5 64.8 64.8
13.00-14.00 58.1 58.1 58.4 58.1 58.1 56.6 58.1 58.4
14.00-15.00 58.9 58.9 63.7 58.9 58.9 57.4 58.9 63.7
15.00-16.00 61.5 61.5 62.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 62.5
16.00-17.00 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5 61.5
17.00-18.00 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5 63.5
18.00-19.00 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.6
19.00-20.00 60.3 60.3 60.3 60.3 60.3 58 60.3 60.3
20.00-21.00 59.4 59.4 57.5 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 57.5
21.00-22.00 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1 54.1
22.00-23.00 49.8 49.8 48 49.8 49.8 49.8 49.8 48
23.00-0.00 51.2 51.2 49.4 51.2 51.2 51 51.2 49.4
0.00-1.00 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9 45.9
1.00-2.00 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1
2.00-3.00 47.6 47.6 47.2 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.6 47.2
3.00-4.00 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 46.9 47.3 47.3
4.00-5.00 48.9 48.9 48 48.9 48.9 48.9 48.9 48
5.00-6.00 48.3 48.3 48.9 48.3 48.3 48.9 48.3 48.9
Leq dB(A)
Day Time 61 61 61.4 61 61 60.6 61 61.4
Leq dB(A)
Night Time 48.5 48.5 47.8 48.5 48.5 48.6 48.5 47.8
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Dadhi-machhagadia
Khordha, Odisha

Date 04.01.2018 08.01.2018 11.01.2018 15.01.2018 18.01.2018 21.01.2018 26.01.2018 30.01.2018
6.00-7.00 56.3 56.1 61.9 58.6 60.5 56 56.9 59
7.00-8.00 59.4 59.3 60.2 60.2 58.7 59.6 62.6 62.8
8.00-9.00 58.8 58.9 58.9 67.1 65.3 56.9 60.2 62.8
9.00-10.00 62.0 62 62 52.7 59.4 56.2 63.8 64.1
10.00-11.00 66.5 66.5 60 52.1 61.4 57.7 64.3 66.6
11.00-12.00 66.3 66.3 62.1 51.1 64.5 56.2 59.7 59.4
12.00-13.00 67.7 67.7 66.7 66.3 58.7 57.9 61.9 61.8
13.00-14.00 58.8 58.8 57.7 56.6 60.1 56.1 59.6 60
14.00-15.00 61.4 61.4 62 62 54.4 52.5 54.1 57.2
15.00-16.00 60.8 60.8 56.7 65.3 61.3 58.2 57.5 59.5
16.00-17.00 61.9 61.9 58.9 52.9 64.4 59.7 56.3 54.1
17.00-18.00 63.9 63.9 61.4 61.4 66.5 63 57.9 54.3
18.00-19.00 60.2 60.2 59 57.4 61.3 58.9 52.5 57.5
19.00-20.00 60.8 60.8 61.1 58.5 62.4 61.9 50.7 56.6
20.00-21.00 60.2 60.2 57.9 58.7 59.5 55.9 52.6 57.6
21.00-22.00 54.5 54.5 53.1 59.3 59 53.8 51.7 54.5
22.00-23.00 50.9 50.9 53.4 60.1 58.8 52.1 53.6 51.8
23.00-0.00 51.7 51.7 52.1 54.9 54 52.4 51.5 52.6
0.00-1.00 51.9 51.9 53.5 57.9 54.1 51.9 52.2 52.1
1.00-2.00 53.0 53 58.8 62.5 57.7 52.2 52.4 52
2.00-3.00 52.2 52.2 55 53 56.1 51.4 51.2 51
3.00-4.00 53.0 53 56.3 58.6 57.6 51.8 51.8 50.5
4.00-5.00 52.6 52.6 57.4 54.8 51.9 51.9 51.9 53.1
5.00-6.00 53.0 53 56 55.8 53.5 53.5 53.5 51.5
Leq dB(A)
Day Time
62.6 62.6 60.9 61.3 62.1 58.3 59.5 60.7
Leq dB(A)
Night Time
52.4 52.4 55.8 58.2 56.1 52.2 52.3 51.9
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Issued to: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Sample Type Ground Water
A/2, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar - 751024 Location Code GW1
Khordha, Odisha
Sample Collected By : ULTRA-TECH
Limit as per IS
Sl. 10500:2017
Chemical Test Parameter Unit Results Methods of Test (Reference)
No. Acceptable Permissible
Limit limit
1 pH -- 7.44 6.5-8.5 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 H+B
2 Turbidity NTU 6.50 1.0 5.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:2130B
3 Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) mg/l 372.0 500.0 2000.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2540 C
4 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 206.80 200.0 600.0 IS : 3025 (Part-21) 2009 (RA 2014)
Calcium Hardness (as
5 mg/l 109.04 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
CaCO3)
Magnesium Hardness
6 mg/l 97.76 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
(as CaCO3)
7 Calcium (as Ca) mg/l 43.70 75.0 200.0 IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
8 Magnesium (as Mg) mg/l 23.76 30.0 100.0 IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 SO32-
9 Sulphate (as SO4) mg/l 34.32 200.0 400.0
B
10 Chloride (as Cl) mg/l 51.47 250.0 1000.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500-Cl B
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:4500 NO3-
11 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 0.19 45.0 No relaxation
E
12 Fluoride (as F) mg/l 0.82 1.0 1.5 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 F-D
13 Iron (as Fe) mg/l 0.63 0.3 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017, 3111B
14 Total Alkalinity mg/l 211.58 200.0 600.00 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2320 B
15 Arsenic (as As) mg/l <0.01 0.01 0.05 IS: 3025 (Part 37): 1988 (RA 2017)
16 Lead (as Pb) mg/l <0.005 0.01 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
17 Copper (as Cu) mg/l <0.01 0.05 1.5 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
18 Nickel (as Ni) mg/l <0.005 0.02 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
19 Total Chromium (as Cr) mg/l <0.01 0.05 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
20 Mercury (as Hg) mg/l <0.0005 0.001 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
21 Cadmium (as Cd) mg/l <0.001 0.003 No relaxation APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
Phenolic Compound (as
22 mg/l <0.0005 0.001 0.002 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
C6H5OH)
23 Zinc (as Zn) mg/l 0.45 5.0 15.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
-- APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 B &
24 Total Coliform MPN/100ml <1.1
C
--
25 Fecal Coliform MPN/100ml Absent APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 E
26 E- Coli MPN/100ml Absent APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 F
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Mangobindapur
Khordha, Odisha
Limit as per IS
Sl. 10500:2017
Limit limit
5 mg/l 62.04 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
CaCO3)
Magnesium Hardness
6 mg/l 45.12 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
(as CaCO3)
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 SO32-
B
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:4500 NO3-
E
22 mg/l <0.0005 0.001 0.002 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
C6H5OH)
-- APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 B &
C
--
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Jhinki Jhari
Khordha, Odisha
Limit as per IS
Sl. 10500:2017
Limit limit
5 mg/l 41.36 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
CaCO3)
Magnesium Hardness
6 mg/l 26.32 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
(as CaCO3)
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 SO32-
B
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:4500 NO3-
E
22 mg/l <0.0005 0.001 0.002 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
C6H5OH)
-- APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 B &
C
--
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha
Limit as per IS
Sl. 10500:2017
Limit limit
5 mg/l 86.48 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
CaCO3)
Magnesium Hardness
6 mg/l 31.96 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
(as CaCO3)
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 SO32-
B
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:4500 NO3-
E
22 mg/l <0.0005 0.001 0.002 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
C6H5OH)
-- APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 B &
C
--
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Dalak
Khordha, Odisha
Limit as per IS
Sl. 10500:2017
Limit limit
5 mg/l 45.00 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
CaCO3)
Magnesium Hardness
6 mg/l 30.00 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
(as CaCO3)
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 SO32-
B
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:4500 NO3-
E
22 mg/l <0.0005 0.001 0.002 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
C6H5OH)
-- APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 B &
C
--
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha
Limit as per IS
Sl. 10500:2017
Limit limit
5 mg/l 210.56 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-40):1991 (RA 2014)
CaCO3)
Magnesium Hardness
6 mg/l 114.68 -- -- IS : 3025 (Part-46):1994 (RA 2014)
(as CaCO3)
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 4500 SO32-
B
APHA 23rd Edn. 2017:4500 NO3-
E
22 mg/l <0.0005 0.001 0.002 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
C6H5OH)
-- APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 B &
C
--
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Issued to: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Sample Type Surface Water
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Near Project site
A/2, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar - 751024 Location Code SW1
Khordha, Odisha
Sl
Parameter Test Unit Test Result Test Method
No.
1 pH Value -- 6.98 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500H+B
2 Total Suspended Solid (as TSS) mg/l 72.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2540 D
3 Total Dissolved Solid (as TDS) mg/l 69.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2540 C
4 Chemical OxygenDemand (as COD) mg/l 15.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5220 B
5 Bio-Chemical Oxygen Demand (as BOD) mg/l 2.50 IS:3025 (Part-44 ):1993 (RA 2014)
6 Conductivity at 25°C µS/cm 120.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2510 B
7 Dissolved Oxygen (as DO) mg/l 7.60 IS:3025 (Part 38 ):1989 (RA 2014)
8 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 24.44 IS 3025 (Part 21 ):1983 (RA 2014)
9 Calcium Hardness mg/l 15.04 IS 3025 (Part 40 ): 1991 (RA 2014)
10 Magnesium Hardness mg/l 9.40 IS 3025 (Part 46 ): 1994 (RA 2014)
11 Calcium (as Ca) mg/l 6.03 IS 3025 (Part 40 ): 1991 (RA 2014)
12 Magnesium (as Mg) mg/l 2.29 IS 3025 (Part 46 ): 1994 (RA 2014)
13 Total Alkalinity mg/l 29.25 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2320 B
14 Chlorde (as Cl -) mg/l 15.44 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500 Cl. B
15 Sulphate (as SO4=) mg/l 3.12 IS 3025 (Part 24 ):1986 (RA 2014)
16 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 0.55 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500-NO3-E.
17 Iron (as Fe) mg/l 2.56 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
18 Fluorides (as F) mg/l 0.25 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500 –F.D.
19 Zinc (as Zn) mg/l 0.20 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
20 Arsenic (as As) mg/l <0.01 IS: 3025 (Part 37): 1998 (RA 2014).
21 Lead (as Pb) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
22 Cadmium (as Cd) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
23 Nickel (as Ni) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
24 Copper (as Cu) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
25 Total Chromium (as Cr) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
26 Phenolic Compounds as C6H5OH mg/l <0.05 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
27 Mercury (as Hg) mg/l <0.001 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
28 Fecal Coliform MPN/100ml 360 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 E
The results relate only to the parameters tested.
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Issued to: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Sample Type Surface water
A/2, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar - 751024 Location Code SW2
Khordha, Odisha
Sl
Parameter Test Unit Test Result Test Method
No.
1 pH Value -- 7.51 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500H+B
2 Total Suspended Solid (as TSS) mg/l 30.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2540 D
3 Total Dissolved Solid (as TDS) mg/l 40.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2540 C
4 Chemical OxygenDemand (as COD) mg/l 11.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5220 B
5 Bio-Chemical Oxygen Demand (as BOD) mg/l <2.0 IS:3025 (Part-44 ):1993 (RA 2014)
6 Conductivity at 25°C µS/cm 58.0 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2510 B
7 Dissolved Oxygen (as DO) mg/l 7.60 IS:3025 (Part 38 ):1989 (RA 2014)
8 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 11.28 IS 3025 (Part 21 ):1983 (RA 2014)
9 Calcium Hardness mg/l 7.52 IS 3025 (Part 40 ): 1991 (RA 2014)
10 Magnesium Hardness mg/l 3.76 IS 3025 (Part 46 ): 1994 (RA 2014)
11 Calcium (as Ca) mg/l 3.014 IS 3025 (Part 40 ): 1991 (RA 2014)
12 Magnesium (as Mg) mg/l 0.91 IS 3025 (Part 46 ): 1994 (RA 2014)
13 Total Alkalinity mg/l 20.47 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 2320 B
14 Chlorde (as Cl -) mg/l 9.36 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500 Cl. B
15 Sulphate (as SO4=) mg/l 2.88 IS 3025 (Part 24 ):1986 (RA 2014)
16 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 0.42 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500-NO3-E.
17 Iron (as Fe) mg/l 0.64 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
18 Fluorides (as F) mg/l 0.30 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 4500 –F.D.
19 Zinc (as Zn) mg/l 0.15 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
20 Arsenic (as As) mg/l <0.01 IS: 3025 (Part 37): 1998 (RA 2014).
21 Lead (as Pb) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
22 Cadmium (as Cd) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
23 Nickel (as Ni) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
24 Copper (as Cu) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
25 Total Chromium (as Cr) mg/l <0.01 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
26 Phenolic Compounds as C6H5OH mg/l <0.05 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 5530 D
27 Mercury (as Hg) mg/l <0.001 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 3111 B.
28 Fecal Coliform MPN/100ml 250 APHA 23rd Edn. 2017 : 9221 E
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Issued to: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Sample Type Soil
A/2, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar - 751024 Location Code S1
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
Parameter Test Unit Test Method
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 6.99
2 Electrical Conductivity at 25°C µs /cm IS: 14767 - 2000 (RA 2016). 16.0
3 Total Nitrogen (as N) mg /gm IS: 14684 - 1999 (RA 2014). 1.34
In-House Method SOP No. SOP/03/08, Issue No. 2 Dated
4 Calcium (as Ca) mg /gm 1.15
01/01/2018
5 Magnesium (as Mg) mg /gm 0.506
01/01/2018
6 Total Organic Carbon mg /gm IS : 2720 ( Part 22 ) : 1972 (RA 2015). 2.59
7 Total Organic Matter mg /gm IS : 2720 ( Part 22 ) : 1972 (RA 2015 ). 4.47
8 Water Soluble Chloride (as Cl) mg /gm 0.20
01/01/2018
9 Total Phosphorus (as P) mg / gm 0.17
01/01/2018
10 Total Soluble Sulfate (as SO4) mg/gm IS 2720 (Part 27):1977 (RA 2015) 0.28
11 Fluoride (as F) mg /kg 14.0
01/01/2018
12 Arsenic (as As) mg /kg 3.0
01/01/2018
13 Copper (as Cu) mg /kg EPA – 3050 B, 7000 B. 11.0
14 Cadmium (as Cd) mg /kg EPA – 3050 B, 7000 B. 5.0
15 Lead (as Pb) mg /kg EPA – 3050 B, 7000 B. 15.0
16 Nickel (as Ni) mg /kg EPA – 3050 B, 7000 B. 29.0
17 Zinc (as Zn) mg /kg EPA – 3050 B, 7000 B. 38.0
18 Iron (as Fe) mg /gm EPA – 3050 B, 7000 B. 119.0
19 Mercury (as Hg) mg /kg EPA – 7471 B. 1.0
meq/100 In-House Method SOP No. SOP/03/05, Issue No. 2 Dated
20 Cataion Exchange Capacity 18.0
gm 01/01/2018
21 Sodium (as Na) mg /gm 0.75
01/01/2018
22 Potassium (as K) mg /gm 1.20
01/01/2018
23 Moisture Content % IS: 2720 (Part 2): 1973 (RA 2015). 3.50
24 Nitrate (as NO3) mg /kg 16.0
01/01/2018
--
25 Specific Gravity IS: 2720 (Part 3) - sec -1: 1980 (RA 2016). 2.51
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 7.04
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
gm 01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
IS: 2720 (Part 3) - sec -1: 1980 (RA 2016).
25 Specific Gravity -- 2.58
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 7.07
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
gm 01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
25 Specific Gravity -- IS: 2720 (Part 3) - sec -1: 1980 (RA 2016). 2.35
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 6.80
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
gm 01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Jagannathpur
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 7.83
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
gm 01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 7.52
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
gm 01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
TEST REPORT
Odisha State Office,Indian Oil Bhawa, Sampling Location Babaja
Khordha, Odisha
Sl Test
No. Result
1 pH -- IS: 2720 (Part 26): 1987 (RA 2016). 7.39
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
gm 01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
01/01/2018
END OF REPORT
For ULTRA-TECH
Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA)
Report
For
Proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plant

Indian Oil Corporation Limited
At
Plot No- 708 and 707(P), Somanathpur of Khordha district,
State: Odisha
By
M/s. ULTRA-TECH
(ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTANCY)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTERS
ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................................. 1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 2
CHAPTER 2:PLANT DETAILS .............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.0 PLANT LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................... 4
2.1. PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.2. PLANT FACILITY ........................................................................................................................................ 6
2.3. PLANT UTILITIES ........................................................................................................................................ 9
2.4. SAFETY RELATED TYPES OF UTILITIES ............................................................................................. 10
2.5. FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM- .................................................................................................................. 10
CHAPTER 3: QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS – METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 13
3.0 AN OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 13
3.1. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE .......................................................................................................... 15
CHAPTER 4: RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 17
4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS AND RELEASE SCENARIOS .............................................................. 17
4.1. FACTORS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS ................................................................................. 17
4.2. SELECTION OF INITIATING EVENTS AND INCIDENTS .................................................................... 18
4.3. TYPES OF OUTCOME EVENTS ............................................................................................................... 19
4.4. PROBABILITIES ......................................................................................................................................... 21
4.5. STABILITY CLASS .................................................................................................................................... 22
CHAPTER 5: SCENARIO SELECTION .............................................................................................................................. 24
5.0 SCENARIO SELECTION OF QRA STUDY ................................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER 6: CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................ 27
6.0 CONSEQUENCE CALCULATIONS .............................................................................................................. 27
6.1. SELECTION OF DAMAGE CRITERIA ..................................................................................................... 28
6.2. CONSEQUENCE RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 31
CHAPTER 7:RISK ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................ 40
7.0 RISK CONCEPT............................................................................................................................................... 40
7.1. RISK ESTIMATION .................................................................................................................................... 41
7.2. RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................................... 44
7.3. ALARP ......................................................................................................................................................... 44
CHAPTER 8:RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................................................... 45
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 45
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 : Nearest Facilities ................................................................................................................. 4
Table 2.1 : MSV Technical Details........................................................................................................ 7
Table 4.1 : Wind Proportion Details .................................................................................................... 22
Table 4.2: PasquiIl‟s Stability Class .................................................................................................... 23
Table 5.1: List of Scenarios & Failure Frequency ............................................................................... 25
Table 6.1: Effects Due To Incident Radiation Intensity ...................................................................... 29

Table 6.2: Damage Due to Overpressure ............................................................................................. 30
Table 6.3: Consequence Results .......................................................................................................... 31
Table 6.4: Immediate Ignition Probability ........................................................................................... 39
Table 7.1: Individual and Societal Risk of each scenarios .................................................................. 42
Table 7.2: Risk Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 44
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig 2.1: Process Flowchart ..................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 3.1: Methodology of QRA Study ............................................................................................. 14
Figure 6.1: Event Tree Analysis .......................................................................................................... 38

ABBREVIATIONS
ALARP As Low As Reasonably Practicable

CCTV Closed Circuit Tele -Vision
EFCV Excess Flow Check Valve
ESD Emergency Shut Down
ESDV Emergency Shut Down Valve
HAZID Hazard Identification
HSE Health Safety & Environment
IOCL Indian Oil Corporation Limited
IR Individual Risk
LOC Loss of Containment
LFL/LEL Lower Flammability Limit / Lower Explosive Limit
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
P&ID Piping and Instrument Diagram
QRA Quantitative Risk Assessment
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SR Societal Risk
TLFG Tanker Lorry Filling Gantry
VCE Vapour Cloud Explosion
Quantitative Risk Assessment Study of Proposed IOCL Khordha LPG Bottling Plant 1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., one of the leading companies in Public Sector is well engaged
in LPG filling/marketing of LPG Cylinders for domestic as well as industrial purposes. Since
demand of LPG is growing day by day, refineries are increasing their capacities for production of
more LPG along with other Oil products.
IOCL has proposed to set up a LPG Bulk Storage and Bottling Facility (Indane Bottling Plant) at
Plot No 701,703,704.706,707(P) & 708 (P) at Mouza Somanathpur, District: Khurda, Odisha
Since LPG is highly inflammable and is stored under pressure in substantial quantities, there is
potential for damage to property and injury in the event of release of significant quantity of LPG.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, IOCL State Office, vide letter of Intent No.OSO/LE/17-18/LT/02
dated 27.06.2017 entrusted Ultra-Tech, to carry out a „Comprehensive Risk Analysis‟ of the
proposed Plant. Our team of experts had visited proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plant of IOCL
to collect relevant data. For the purpose of obtaining specification of proposed different onsite
facilities, pipe lines, as well as off site facilities, a detailed questionnaire was prepared. During
visit of our team members, they had collected the required information‟s in the format. Pertinent
documents like lay out plan. P&I diagram, were collected from the Proposed Plant. Our team
members along with the staffs of the station had gone round the Plant. Besides operational
aspect, the team was also apprised of the organizational set up, existing system of handling
Emergency Situation, available fire fighting system
Ultra-Tech wants to put on record the excellent co operation they had received from the
respective In charge of the proposed station and his team during entire course of their study. We
extend our thanks especially to Mr. A. Biswas, DGM (LPG-E), Odisha State Office and Mr.
Ansuman Rath, Manager (LPG-Engineering), Khordha BP Project for their excellent support in
making the information, documents available.
Scope of work includes the following:
 Identification of Hazards and Major Loss of Containment (LOC) events.
 Calculation of physical effects of accidental scenarios, which includes frequency analysis for
incident scenarios leading to hazards to people and facilities (flammable gas, fire, and smoke
and explosion overpressure hazards) and consequence analysis for the identified hazards
covering impact on people and potential escalation.
 Damage limits identification and quantification of the risks and contour mapping on the plant
layout.
 Risk contour mapping.
 Evaluation of risks against risk acceptable limit
 Risk reduction measures to prevent incident to control the accident
 Hazard mitigation recommendations based on QRA
 Provide consolidated conclusion on QRA of location
CHAPTER 2:PLANT DETAILS
2.0 PLANT LOCATION

M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) Propsed Bottling Plant is located at Somanathpur of
Khordha district of Odisha State; it is approximately 2 away from NH-5 and 10 KM away from
Khordha Town. The nearest village Somanathpur and human settlement is located at a distance
of about 5 KM. The land area is approximately 32 Acre.
Table 1.1 : Nearest Facilities

Distance
Sl. No Facilities Name (km
1 Railway Station Khurda Road Railway Station 18 km
2 Air Port Biju Patnaik International Airport 35 km
3 Bus Stand Kaipader 5 km
4 Police Station Khurda 10 km
5 Fire Station Khurda 12 km
6 Hospital Khurda Hospital 13 km
7 National Highway NH – 5 2 km
The plant premise is bounded by the following

North Side : Stone Crusher & Vacant Land
East Side : Stone Crusher
South Side : Kaipadar Road
West Side : Vacant Land
2.1. PROCESS DESCRIPTION

The project envisages receipt of LPG in bulk through Road tankers (18 MT & 21 Capacity) from
Paradip Refinery, Haldia Refinery, IPPL Haldia and HPCL Vizag Refinery. Storage of LPG in 3
Nos. of Mounded Storage Bullets/Vessels of 600 MT capacity each. The LPG bottled in
cylinders at this Plant will be distributed in nearby areas. Bottling capacity of the plant is
approximately 15000 cylinders per shift. The Plant will be running in two shifts ( 6.00 AM to
2.00 PM and 2.00 PM to 10.00PM) LPG brought in tankers from above mentioned source will be
unloaded into storage vessels by parking the tankers in Tanker Lorry Decanting (TLD) gantry.
The unloading operation will be carried out with the help of compressors. During unloading of
LPG, vapour from the MSV will be sucked at 10.0 kg/cm2 (max) and will be compressed in LPG
compressor to 12.0 kg/cm2. The compressed LPG vapour will pressurize the Road Tanker and
LPG (liquid) will be transferred from Road Tanker to Mounded Storage Vessels (MSV). The
Road Tanker will be connected to liquid line and vapour line from MSV by unloading Arms with
Excess Flow Check Valves(EFCV) and isolation Ball valve respectively. Vapour LPG line shall
be connected to the compressor through 02 Ball valves i.e. one for suction and one for discharge.
After LPG unloading, the compressor suction shall be reversed by changing four way valve
direction and LPG Vapour shall be recovered from road tankers through the same compressor
and discharged to MSV till the suction pressure of compressor falls from an initial value of 11.6
kg/ cm2 to 2 kg/ cm2.
LPG from MSV is transferred through a pipeline to filling manifolds of Carousal with the help of
centrifugal pumps.
The empty LPG cylinders brought into premises by Trucks are received and stored in the empty
shed. They are fed to conveyer system after due inspection and are carried to the filling machines
in the filling shed. The filling is cut off as soon as the weight of LPG in the cylinder reaches 14.2
kg. After filling, these. Cylinders reaches 14.2 kg & 19 kg. After that these cylinders are counter
checked for correct weight, tested for leaks from valves and body, capped and sealed before
sending them to the filled cylinder shed. Any defective cylinder is emptied for product LPG
recovery and sent for cold repair in the valve changing shed. The filled cylinders are dispatched
to the distributors.
Fig 2.1: Process Flowchart
2.2. PLANT FACILITY

 Receiving
Bulk LPG is received from Paradip Refinery, Haldia Refinery, IPPL Haldia and HPCL Vizag
Refinery by Road tankers and is decanted at Tank lorry Gantry. 8 Nos. of Bulk LPG Trucks can
be unloaded simultaneously. LPG from the tank Trucks is transferred to the storage vessels
through LPG Compressors by differential pressure method.
 Storage
3 Nos. Mounded Storage vessels having a safe filling capacity of 600 MT each. On the top of
the MSV two nos. of safety relief valves are provided, one valve is set at 21.2 kg/cm2 and
other is set at 22.2 kg/cm2. All MSV are provided with two independent level indicators and
high level alarm. Remote operated valves are provided in liquid and vapour lines of each storage
vessels. Technical details of the MSV are as under:
Table 2.1 : MSV Technical Details
Sl. No Item Technical Details

1 Mounded Storage Vessel 600MT
2 Design Pressure 15.4kg/cm2
3 Operating Pressure 11 kg/cm2
4 Hydro testing Pressure 20.83 kg/cm2
5 Design Code PD5500
6 Corrosion Allowance 1.5mm
7 Design temperature 65˚C
The mounded bullets are cylindrical pressures vessels installed on compact sand bay and
covered with sand mound in a pyramid shape. The mounded storage of LPG has proved to be
safer compared to above ground storage vessels since it provides intrinsically passive and safe
environment and eliminates the possibility of Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion
(BLEVE). The cover of the mound protects the vessel from fire engulfment, radiation from a
fire in close proximity and acts of sabotage or vandalism. The area of land required to locate a
mounded system is minimal compared to conventional storage. Excavation up to a depth of 0.75
m is done for construction of mounded bullet foundation (below FGL). Cathodic protection
through sacrificial anode method has been provided for all the three bullets to prevent them
from corrosion.
 Filling Operation
LPG is transferred from storage vessel to Carousals, where filling of cylinders takes place with
help of LPG pump and also to increase the discharge pressure of LPG pump, pressurization
takes place from the other bullet to this delivery bullet with help of LPG compressors.
The sequence of filling operation starts with the receipts of empty cylinders and the fallowing
operation are carried out:
 Decapping and tying of missing caps
 Visual checking for defects and tare weight
 Filling
 Electronic weigment checking
 Correction of overfilled and under filled cylinder Valve leak / „O‟ ring checking
 Cylinder body and bung leak checking
 Capping and sealing
 Loading in trucks
Empty cylinders are unloaded from Trucks and manually placed over chain conveyor. As they
move on the conveyor, the empty cylinder is to be checked visually for defects and markings.
Defective cylinders are to be segregated. There are provision for storing about 15000 empty
cylinders in the empty cylinders storage shed.
The cylinders after decapping are moved on to the filling machine for filling and will be filled
automatically at a rate of approximately 24 to 28 cylinders per minute. Filled cylinder
automatically come out of the Carousal and continues to travel in the conveyor for weighment
checking. The under / over filled cylinders are separated for weight correction. Cylinders with
correct weight are to be subjected to valve leak check, O Ring leak and body and bung leak
check as they move on the conveyor. Cylinder found defective on the above checks will be sent
for replacement of Valve in online valve changing machine and replacement of O Ring. Sound
cylinders are to be moved on for capping and sealing the valves. Cylinders will then be loaded
on to Trucks or will be stored in the storage shed which can store about 6400 nos. of filled
cylinders.
2.2.1. Automatic Filling Process Functional Description

LPG is pumped to the Carousal from which the cylinders of different sizes are filled under
pressure
The system described is intended for filling standard domestic & individual LPG cylinder, with
a minimum number of operations, with process, production and monitoring function carried out
with the help of sophisticated equipment and control system.
 Vapour Extraction
Vapour extraction system will facilitate extraction of any leakage of LPG from around the
Carousal and other leak prone areas and discharge the same of suitable elevation above the roof
level of shed. The system will be completed with exhaust fan and necessary ducting.
 Evacuation & Valve Change
Cylinder found defective in valves, bung or body will be evacuated of their contents using a
vapour compressor and the evacuated LPG will be sent back to the bullets. Leaky valves will be
removed and fitted with new valves change shed. Cylinders that require hot work will be sent to
the authorized repair shops
 Purging Facility
Purging will be required in the fallowing cases:
● New cylinder received are required to be air evacuated and LPG purged before the same are
filled.
● Repaired cylinders which have been hydro tested with water are subject to evacuation for
removal of moisture and air before refilling.
● An online purging system has been provided.
2.3. PLANT UTILITIES

 Air compressor/ Receiver/ Dryer
Air compressor along with air receiver and dryer are provided to cater to the requirement of
instrument air for Carousal, pneumatics, ROVs, fire protection system
Compressed air is required for the following purpose
 Pneumatic actuation of different on-line instruments like ROV and control valve.
 Instrument actuation in LPG filling system.
For compressed air requirement, 2 nos. of 300 CFM at 7.0 kg/sq cm capacity air compressors
have been proposed installed.
Two No. LPG Compressors of 150 CFM with 12kg/sq cm inlet air pressure capacity will be
provide for fulfilling dry requirement
 Electrical System
The total power demand of the LPG filling plant is in the region of 400 KVA. Client‟s battery
limit has been considered as the incoming HT supply at 33 KV and through the two-pole
structure / substation would be brought into 750 KVA transformers for further onward LT
distribution. Incoming supply is taken from the state electricity board at 33 KV.
 Transformer: 2 x 750 KVA, 3- phases. 50 C/S Air cooled transformer is installed in the plant.
 Standby Power Supply:1x 500 KVA, 1 x 250 KVA
 Electrical Fittings: All electrical fitting in the sensitive area are of flameproof / intrinsically
safe design
2.4. SAFETY RELATED TYPES OF UTILITIES
Some of the general safety features for the storage & handling of LPG provided in the complex
are discussed below
2.4.1. Design
The main feature of the plant is the safe design of the equipment & pipelines .Equipment are
designed, inspected stage wise tested & certified by statutory authorities such as CCOE(Chief
Controller of Explosives) & third party in accordance with relevant codes & standards . The
main codes & standards used in the LPG bottling plant are ASME VUl or IS-2825 or BS-5500 or
equivalent duly approved by CCE for pressure vessels. Materials of Construction (MOC) used
are SA 516 Gr. 70. Full radiography, stress relieving & hydrotest is carried out for the vessels &
all critical drawings /documents are certified & approved by the competent authority. All critical
LPG piping is seamless carbon steel of 300# rating with piping designed in accordance with
ASTM, ANSI & equivalent codes & standards within built margin of safety.
Intrinsic safety is largely built in into the design itself through use of time tested standards &
codes which inherently incorporate a good margin of safety. Apart from the equipment design &
selection (only well known reputed vendors with proven safe & trouble free track record in
similar service are selected ) there are other features related to safety in the layout .operation ,
shutdown systems etc
2.5. FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM-

The gas leak detection, fire prevention and control system at Khordha LPG Bottling Plant are the
latest and comply with the OISD norms. The following systems are provided at Khordha
Bottling Plant:-
2.5.1. Gas Monitoring System

The system consists of gas detecting sensors linked to a computerized processing unit and with
alarm panels at control room, filing shed, plant manager‟s cabin as well as security gate having
audio / visual alarms and MIMIC Panel to alert the plant personnel. The sensors are located at
sensitive or potential hazard areas in the plant.
2.5.2. Vapour Extraction System

It is a blower with ducts extended to different operating points in filling shed. The blower
extracts any leaking LPG vapour from the floor level and cold flares the same to the free
atmosphere at the height of 1.5 meter from the highest points of eves of the shed. This system is
interlocked with filling system, such that the blower has to be started before the Carousal is
started for filling operation. A standby blower is also given to meet situations where one of the
blowers is out of order. In this way there is no accumulation of LPG at plant floor level and any
minor leaks due to operating operation is immediately evacuated and not allowed to reach the
lower explosive limit.
2.5.3. Remote Control Valves
These are pneumatically operated quick shut off valves provided on LPG pipelines with
actuating points located both remotely and nearer to operating facilities in plant. When actuated,
the valves will close within 25 seconds, stopping the flow of LPG in pipelines. In case of
leakage of LPG through flange joint or rupture of pipeline, the remote operated valves are
operated restricting the leakage of LPG to the sections between two ROVs only and the LPG in
upstream area and the storage bullet area is cut off from the leaking point, thereby preventing
major leakage or fire.
2.5.4. High Level Alarm

This kind of alarm is installed in storage bullets and other vessels. In case of filling of more than
85 % the alarm will be actuated at Pump Housed which is a manned location and REMOTE
OPERATED VALVES installed in storage vessel will close the flow of LPG to vessel. The
actuation of REMOTE OPERATED valve and alarm is interlocked with the level of LPG liquid
in vessel.
2.5.5. Emergency Trip Buttons & Manual Call Points

These emergency push buttons are provided at strategic places in the plant. In case of
emergency, when the emergency trip button is actuated action takes place as specified in the
clause 11.11 of OISD 144 which involves tripping of electricity to all the operating equipment in
the hazardous area of the plant, closure of all remote operated valves on the LPG pipelines and
sounding of siren. Operation of manual call point will denote a abnormal situation alerting the
plant personnel and will involve the sounding of siren only. These points are provided at
strategic locations in the plant.
2.5.6. Medium Velocity Spray System

This sprinkle system is provided in the operating areas of hazardous areas of plant like al sheds
involving filling, storage and operation on cylinders, tank lorry decantation shed, expose flanges
of mounded storage, LPG pump house, etc., as per the specifications given in OISD 144 / 150.
Adequate storage of fire water in exclusive above ground tanks is maintained as per the fire
water calculation. There is a fire water pipeline system which is constantly kept pressurized with
a minimum of 7 kg per centimeter square using jockey pumps which start and stop automatically
at preset pressures. The fire water pipeline is connected to the MV spray system through deluge
walls where an air water balance is maintained. The MV Spray system is equipped with a
quartzoid bulb fire detection system. When the temperature reaches 79º C the bulb will be burst
releasing the air water balance at the deluge valve and thereby starting the sprinkling of water.
This will reduce the pressure in the pipeline which will start the fire water pumps. Thus the
entire system of fire protection is automatic. In case of actuation of sprinkler either by bursting
of quartzoid bulb, or operating sprinkler manually, all plant machineries will trip electrically,
electric siren will be sounded , fire engine will be started ,all remote operated valve in liquid
LPG line will be closed and emergency light will be activated ( At night). This system is called
Interlocked Shut down System.
2.5.7. Fire Water Storage
Total three numbers of fire water tanks with capacity of 2500KL each.
Total fire water storage = 7500 KL.
2.5.8. Fire Water Pumps Capacity

There will be three Fire water pumps of 615 cum per hour capacity out of which two will be in
the main pumps and one fire pump will be a standby. There will be two Jockey pumps (one main
and one standby) with a capacity of 10 Cum/Hr which start and stop automatically to maintain
the water pressure at minimum 7 kg per sq cm in the fire hydrant line at the farthest end. There
will be three diesel engine fire water pumps with a capacity of 615 Cum/Hr.
2.5.9. Deluge Valve System

Different Modes of Operating Deluge Valve are
 By Remote operation.
 By Breakage of Quartzoid Bulb.
 By draining water locally.
2.5.10. Fire Alarm System

 Major Fire: A wailing siren for two minutes. Siren will be sounded 3 times for thirty
seconds with an interval of fifteen second in between.
 Disaster: Same type of siren as in case of major fire but the same will be sounded for three
times at the interval of 2 minutes.
 All Clear (for Fire): Straight run siren for 2 minutes
CHAPTER 3: QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS –
METHODOLOGY
3.0 AN OVERVIEW
Risk Analysis is proven valuable as a management tool in assessing the overall safety
performance of the Chemical Process Industry. Although management systems such as
engineering codes, checklists, and reviews by experienced engineers have provided substantial
safety assurances, major incidents involving numerous casualties, injuries and significant
damage can occur - as illustrated by recent world-scale catastrophes. Risk Analysis techniques
provide advanced quantitative means to supplement other hazard identification, analysis,
assessment, control and management methods to identify the potential for such incidents and to
evaluate control strategies.
The underlying basis of Risk Analysis is simple in concept. It offers methods to answer the
following four questions:
1. What can go wrong?

2. What are the causes?
3. What are the consequences?
4. How likely is it?
This study tries to quantify the risks to rank them accordingly based on their severity and
probability. The report shall be used to understand the significance of existing control measures
and to follow the measures continuously. Wherever possible the additional risk control measures
shall be adopted to bring down the risk levels. The methodology adopted for the QRA Study has
been depicted in the Flow chart given below:
Figure 3.1: Methodology of QRA Study
3.1. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Hazard identification and risk assessment involves a series of steps as follows:
Step 1: Identification of the Hazard

Based on consideration of factors such as the physical & chemical properties of the fluids being
handled, the arrangement of equipment, operating & maintenance procedures and process
conditions, external hazards such as third party interference, extreme environmental conditions,
aircraft / helicopter crash shall also be considered.
Step 2: Assessment of the Risk

Arising from the hazards and consideration of its tolerability to personnel, the facility and the
environment, this involves the identification of initiating events, possible accident sequences,
and likelihood of occurrence and assessment of the consequences. The acceptability of the
estimated risk must then be judged based upon criteria appropriate to the particular situation.
Step 3: Elimination or Reduction of the Risk

Where this is deemed to be necessary, this involves identifying opportunities to reduce the
likelihood and/or consequence of an accident.
 Hazard Identification is a critical step in Risk Analysis. Many aids are available, including
experience, engineering codes, checklists, detailed process knowledge, equipment failure
experience, hazard index techniques, What-if Analysis, Hazard and Operability (HAZOP)
Studies, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Preliminary Hazard Analysis
(PHA). In this phase all potential incidents are identified and tabulated. Site visit and study of
operations and documents like drawings, process write-up etc. are used for hazard
identification.
 Assessment of Risks is based on the consequences and likelihood. Consequence Estimation is
the methodology used to determine the potential for damage or injury from specific incidents.
A single incident (e.g. rupture of a pressurized flammable liquid tank) can have many distinct
incident outcomes (e.g. Unconfined Vapour Cloud Explosion (UVCE), flash fire.
 Likelihood Assessment is the methodology used to estimate the frequency or probability of

occurrence of an incident. Estimates may be obtained from historical incident data on failure
frequencies or from failure sequence models, such as fault trees and event trees. In this study
the historical data developed by software models and those collected by CPR18E –
Committee for Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands (Edition: PGS 3, 2005) are used.
 Risk Assessment combines the consequences and likelihood of all incident outcomes from
all selected incidents to provide a measure of risk. The risks of all selected incidents are
individually estimated and summed to give an overall measure of risk.
 Risk-Reduction Measures include those to prevent incidents (i.e. reduce the likelihood of
occurrence) to control incidents (i.e. limit the extent & duration of a hazardous event) and to
mitigate the effects (i.e. reduce the consequences). Preventive measures, such as using
inherently safer designs and ensuring asset integrity, shall be used wherever practicable. In
many cases, the measures to control and mitigate hazards and risks are simple and obvious
and involve modifications to conform to standard practice. The general hierarchy of risk
reducing measures is:
 Prevention (by distance or design)
 Detection (e.g. fire & gas, Leak detection)
 Control (e.g. emergency shutdown & controlled depressurization)
 Mitigation (e.g. firefighting and passive fire protection)
 Emergency response (in case safety barriers fail)
CHAPTER 4: RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS AND RELEASE SCENARIOS

A technique commonly used to generate an incident list is to consider potential leaks and major
releases from fractures of all process pipelines and vessels. This compilation includes all pipe
work and vessels in direct communication, as these may share a significant inventory that cannot
be isolated in an emergency. The following data were collected to envisage scenarios:
 Composition of materials stored in vessels / flowing through pipeline

 Inventory of materials stored in vessels
 Flow rate of materials passing through pipelines
 Vessels / Pipeline conditions (phase, temperature, pressure)
 Connecting piping and piping dimensions.
Accidental release of flammable liquids / gases can result in severe consequences. Delayed
ignition of flammable gases can result in blast overpressures covering large areas. This may lead
to extensive loss of life and property. In contrast, fires have localized consequences. Fires can be
put out or contained in most cases; there are few mitigating actions one can take once a
flammable gas or a vapour cloud gets released. Major accident hazards arise, therefore,
consequent upon the release of flammable gases.
4.1. FACTORS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS

In any installation, main hazard arises due to loss of containment during handling of flammable
liquids / gases. To formulate a structured approach to identification of hazards, an understanding
of contributory factors is essential.
 Blast Over Pressures

Blast Overpressures depend upon the reactivity class of material and the amount of gas between
two explosive limits. These gases in general have medium reactivity and in case of confinement
of the gas cloud, on delayed ignition may result in an explosion and overpressures.
 Operating Parameters
Potential gas release for the same material depends significantly on the operating conditions. The
gases are likely to operate at atmospheric temperature (and hence high pressures). This operating
range is enough to release a large amount of gas in case of a leak / rupture, therefore the pipeline
leaks and ruptures need to be considered in the risk analysis calculations.
 Inventory
Inventory Analysis is commonly used in understanding the relative hazards and short listing of
release scenarios. Inventory plays an important role in regard to the potential hazard. Larger the
inventory of a vessel or a system, larger is the quantity of potential release. A practice commonly
used to generate an incident list is to consider potential leaks and major releases from fractures of
pipelines and vessels/tanks containing sizable inventories.
 Range of Incidents
Both the complexity of study and the number of incident outcome cases are affected by the range
of initiating events and incidents covered. This not only reflects the inclusion of accidents and /
or non-accident-initiated events, but also the size of those events. For instance studies may
evaluate one or more of the following:
 catastrophic failure of container
 large hole (large continuous release)
 smaller holes (continuous release)
 leaks at fittings or valves (small continuous release)
In general, quantitative studies do not include very small continuous releases or short duration
small releases if past experience or preliminary consequence modeling shows that such releases
do not contribute to the overall risk levels.
4.2. SELECTION OF INITIATING EVENTS AND INCIDENTS

The selection of initiating events and incidents shall take into account the goals or objectives of
the study and the data requirements. The data requirements increase significantly when non -
accident - initiated events are included and when the number of release size increase. While the
potential range of release sizes is tremendous, groupings are both appropriate and necessitated by
data restrictions. The main reasons for including release sizes other than the catastrophic are to
reduce the conservatism in an analysis and to better understand the relative contributions to risk
of small versus large releases.
As per CPR 18 E guidelines & Reference Manual BEVI Risk Assessments Version 3.2 only the
Loss of Containment (LOC) which is basically the release scenarios contributing to the
individual and/ or societal risk are included in the QRA. LOCs of the plant are included only if
the following conditions are fulfilled:
 Frequency of occurrence is equal to or greater than 10-8 and
 Lethal damage (1% probability) occurs outside the establishment‟s boundary or the
transport route.
There may be number of accidents that may occur quite frequently, but due to proper control
measures or fewer quantities of chemicals released, they are controlled effectively. A few
examples are a leak from a gasket, pump or valve, release of a LPG from a relief valve, and fire
in a pump due to overheating. These accidents generally are controlled before they escalate by
using control systems and monitoring devices – used because such piping and equipment are
known to sometimes fail or malfunction, leading to problems.
On the other hand, there are less problematic areas / units that are generally ignore or not given
due attention. Such LOCs are identified by studying the facilities and Event Tree Analysis etc.
and accidents with less consequence are ignored. Some of the critical worst case scenarios
identified by the Hazard Identification study are also assessed as per the guidelines of
Environment Protection Agency.
4.3. TYPES OF OUTCOME EVENTS

In this section of the report we describe the probabilities associated with the sequence of
occurrences which must take place for the incident scenarios to produce hazardous effects and
the modeling of their effects.
Considering the present case the outcomes expected are
 Bleve
 Jet Fires
 Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE)
 Heavy Cloud Dispersion
4.3.1. Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion (BLEVE)
This phenomenon occurs when pressure inside a storage vessel increases above the design
pressure due to a fire in the adjacent area. Due to impingement of flame or due to radiant heat,
temperature in the vapour portion of the storage vessel increases rapidly compared to the portion
filled with liquid. Increase in temperatures softens and weakens the metal wall of the shell. With
the rise in vapour pressure and inadequate vapour space for expansion , the shell of storage tanks
bursts causing fragments of the shell flying like projectiles with release of whole mass of
pressurized boiling liquid. The released liquid flashes and atomies immediately often resulting
a large fire ball in contact with an ignited source. Although the fire ball lasts only a few seconds ,
its effect is devastating due to flame contact and intense thermal radiation. This phenomenon is
called BLEVE. The effect of BLEVE extends beyond the plant boundary in case of catastrophic
failure of large pressurized storage vessels
4.3.2. Jet Fire
Jet fire occurs when a pressurized release (of a flammable fluid) is ignited by any source. They
tend to be localized in effect and are mainly of concern in establishing the potential for domino
effects and employee safety zones rather than for community risks.
The jet fire model is based on the radiant fraction of total combustion energy, which is assumed
to arise from a point slowly along the jet flame path. The jet dispersion model gives the jet flame
length.
4.3.3. Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE)
Vapour cloud explosion is the result of flammable materials in the atmosphere, a subsequent
dispersion phase, and after some delay an ignition of the vapour cloud. Turbulence is the
governing factor in blast generation, which could intensify combustion to the level that will
result in an explosion. Obstacles in the path of vapour cloud or when the cloud finds a confined
area, as under the bullets, often create turbulence. Insignificant level of confinement will result in
a flash fire. The VCE will result in overpressures.
It may be noted that VCEs have been responsible for very serious accidents involving severe
property damage and loss of lives. Vapour Cloud Explosions in the open area with respect to
Pure Methane is virtually impossible due to their lower density.
4.3.4. Unconfined Vapour Cloud Explosion (UVCE)
Clouds of LPG vapour mixed with air (within flammability limit) may cause propagating flames
when ignited. In certain cases flame take place within seconds the thermal radiation intensity is
severe depending on the total mass of LPG in the cloud and may cause secondary fires. When
the flame travels very fast it explodes high over pressures or blast effects causing heavy damage
at considerable distance from the release point. Such explosions are called unconfined vapour
cloud explosion.
4.4. PROBABILITIES
4.4.1. Population Probabilities
It is necessary to know the population exposure in order to estimate the consequences and the
risk resulting from an incident. The exposed population is often defined using a population
density. Population densities are an important part of a QRA for several reasons. The most
notable is that the density is typically used to determine the number of people affected by a given
incident with a specific hazard area. Sometimes, population data are available in sketchy forms.
In the absence of specific population data default categories can be used.
The population density can be averaged over the whole area that may be affected or the area can
be subdivided into any number of segments with a separate population density for each
individual segment. The population data for the outside population and inside population has
been taken from census data.
Population in the Proposed Bottling Plant;
 TLF 10
 Pump house 1
 Filling Shed 30
 Admin 9
 Canteen 5
 Security per Room 2
 Parking Area 70
Nearby village and surrounding Population in 2 Km;

 Somnathpur 1500
 Kuradhamal 500
 Dadhimachhagarhia 1000
4.4.2. Failure/Accident Probabilities
The failure data is taken from CPR 18E –Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment,
developed by the Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands. The failure frequency
data and list of scenarios is given in Table
 Weather Probabilities
The following meteorological data is used for the study:
 Wind Speed : 1.5m/s and 5m/s

 Atmospheric Temperature : 45OC 30°C
 Atmospheric Pressure : 101.325 KN/m2
 Humidity : 64% to 30 &
 Surface roughness : 0.02 m
 Solar Radiation : 0.12kW/m2
 Wind stability class : F (1.5F )
Wind proportion in each direction with respect to each wind speed is calculated and tabulated
below based on the wind rose chart of Khordha.
Table 4.1 : Wind Proportion Details
Wind Direction Distribution

NE 1.1
ENE 2.6
NE 3.8
ENE 4.9
E 6.5
W 5.9
SWS 4.5
4.5. STABILITY CLASS

The tendency of the atmosphere to resist or enhance vertical motion and thus turbulence is
termed as stability. Stability is related to both the change of temperature with height (the lapse
rate) driven by the boundary layer energy budget, and wind speed together with surface
characteristics (roughness).
A neutral atmosphere neither enhances nor inhibits mechanical turbulence. An unstable

atmosphere enhances turbulence, whereas a stable atmosphere inhibits mechanical turbulence.
Stability classes are defined for different meteorological situations, characterized by wind speed
and solar radiation (during the day) and cloud cover during the night. The so called Pasquill-
Turner stability classes‟ dispersion estimates include six (6) stability classes as below:
 A – Very Unstable
 B – Unstable
 C – Slightly Unstable
 D – Neutral
 E – Stable
 F – Very Stable
The typical stability classes for various wind speed and radiation levels during entire day are
presented in Table 4.2
Table 4.2: PasquiIl’s Stability Class
Day : Solar Radiation Night : cloud Cover

Wind Speed
Thinly Overcast >
(m/s) Strong Moderate Slight Moderate
< 40% 80%
<2 A A-B B - - D
2-3 A-B B C E F D
3-5 B B-C C D E D
5-6 C C-D D D D D
>6 C D D D D D
For the study purpose, and consistent with good industry practice, the following weather
conditions have been considered:
 1.5F - F stability class and wind speed of 1.5m/sec

 5D - D stability class and wind speed of 5m/sec
7.1.1. Ignition Probabilities
For gas/ oil releases from the gas/ oil handling system, where a large percentage of rupture
events may be due to third party damage, a relatively high probability of immediate ignition is
generally used.
Delayed ignition takes other factors into account. Delayed ignition probabilities can also be
determined as a function of the cloud area or the location. In general as the size of the cloud
increases, the probability of delayed ignition decreases. This is due to the likelihood that the
cloud has already encountered an ignition source and ignited before dispersing over a larger area
(i.e. the cloud reaches an ignition source relatively close to the point of origin).
For this study the ignition probabilities have been modified to suit the existing site conditions.
The ignition probabilities inside enclosed areas shall be much higher than the open areas. It is
because of the fact that there will be much more activities taking place and the possibility of
ignition increases. In this study the following probabilities were taken as per CPR 18 E.
CHAPTER 5: SCENARIO SELECTION
5.0 SCENARIO SELECTION OF QRA STUDY
This section documents the consequence-distance calculations, which have been computed for
the accident release scenarios considered.
In Risk Analysis studies contributions from low frequency - high outcome effect as well as high
frequency - low outcome events are distinguished; the objective of the study is emergency
planning, hence only holistic & conservative assumptions are used for obvious reasons. Hence
though the outcomes may look pessimistic, the planning for emergency concept shall be borne in
mind whilst interpreting the results.
For this study rupture of LPG storage vessel is not considered as it‟s a mounded storage so the
possibility of rupture of vessel is nearly impossible. Similarly rupture of Road tanker within the
IOCL scope is not possible so it is not considered for the study.
The following are the LOC scenarios which were selected for modeling.
Table 5.1: List of Scenarios & Failure Frequency
Source of Relative Release Calculated

S. Flow rate Diamete
Scenario Description Strength in Humidit Duration Failure
No m3/hr r in m
kg y% S Frequency
18 MT Road tanker 8100 30 0 - - 1.80E-08
1 Bleve 21 MT Road tanker 9450 30 0 1.80E-08
10 MT filled Cylinder Truck 9000 30 - - - 1.80E-08
Pipeline rupture From Bullet to pump (100%) - 64 20.8 200 1800 2.50E-06
Heavy Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) - 64 4.4 150 1800 3.75E-05
2 Cloud Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck - 64 10.6 100 1800 6.00E-06
Dispersion Vapour return header under 150 CFM
- 64 14.6 100 1800 3.00E-04
Compression
Carousal return line( liquid) rupture - 64 6.5 50 1800 1.00E-06
Carousal return line ( Vapour) rupture - 64 6.4 50 1800 1.00E-06
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) - 64 12.12 80 1800 5.48E-05
Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck - 30 10.6 100 1800 6.00E-06
Liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet
- 30 515.4 200 1800 3.13E-06
3 Jet Fire suction
Vapour return header under 150 CFM
- 30 14.6 100 1800 1.80E-05
Compression
Carousal return line ( liquid) rupture - 30 6.5 50 1800 1.00E-06
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) rupture - 30 12.12 50 1800 5.48E-05
Relative Release Calculated
Flow rate Diameter
S.No Scenario Description Humidity Duration Failure
m3/hr m
% S Frequency
Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (100%)
64 21.8 200 1800 3.13E-06
Pipeline rupture To Carousal (100 %) 1800
64 17.8 150 7.50E-06
Pipeline rupture From bullet truck (25%) 1800
64 5.4 200 1.56E-05
Vapour Cloud
Explosion Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) 1800
4 64 4.4 150 3.75E-05
(VCE)
64 515.4 200 3.13E-06
suction
64 128.8 200 1.56E-05
suction
Carousal return line ( liquid ) rupture 1800
64 6.5 50 1.00E-05
CHAPTER 6: CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS
6.0 CONSEQUENCE CALCULATIONS

In consequence analysis, use is made of a number of calculation models to estimate the physical
effects of an accident (spill of hazardous material) and to predict the damage (lethality, injury,
material destruction) of the effects.
Accidental release of flammable liquids / gases can result in severe consequences. Immediate
ignition of the pressurized chemical will result in a jet flame. Delayed ignition of flammable vapors
can result in blast overpressures covering large areas. This may lead to extensive loss of life and
property. In contrast, fires have localized consequences. Fires can be put out or contained in most
cases; there are few mitigating actions one can take once a vapour cloud gets released.
The calculations can roughly be divided in three major groups:
a) Determination of the source strength parameters;

b) Determination of the consequential effects;
c) Determination of the damage or damage distances.
The basic physical effect models consist of the following.
Source strength parameters
 Calculation of the outflow of liquid out of a vessel / Tank or a pipe, in case of rupture. Also
Two-phase outflow can be calculated.
 Calculation, in case of liquid outflow, of the instantaneous flash evaporation and of the
dimensions of the remaining liquid pool.
 Calculation of the evaporation rate, as a function of volatility of the material, pool dimensions
and wind velocity.
 Source strength equals pump capacities, etc. in some cases.
Consequential effects
 Dispersion of gaseous material in the atmosphere as a function of source strength, relative

density of the gas, weather conditions and topographical situation of the surrounding area.
 Intensity of heat radiation [in kW/ m2] due to a fire, as a function of the distance to the source.
 Energy of vapour cloud explosions [in N/m2], as a function of the distance to the distance of the
exploding cloud.
 Concentration of gaseous material in the atmosphere, due to the dispersion of evaporated LPG
and can form an explosive mixture.
It may be obvious, that the types of models that must be used in a specific risk study strongly depend
upon the type of material involved:
 Gas, vapour, liquid, solid
 Inflammable, explosive, toxic, toxic combustion products
 Stored at high/low temperatures or pressure
 Controlled outflow (pump capacity) or catastrophic failure
6.1. SELECTION OF DAMAGE CRITERIA
The damage criteria give the relation between the extents of the physical effects (exposure) and the
effect of consequences. For assessing the effects on human beings consequences are expressed in
terms of injuries and the effects on equipment / property in terms of monetary loss.
The effect of consequences for release of toxic substances or fire can be categorized as
 Damage caused by heat radiation on material and people;

 Damage caused by explosion on structure and people;
In Consequence Analysis studies, in principle three types of exposure to hazardous effects are
distinguished:
1. Heat radiation due to fires. In this study, the concern is that of Jet fires and flash fires.
2. Explosions
The knowledge about these relations depends strongly on the nature of the exposure. Following are
the criteria selected for damage estimation:
6.1.1 Heat Radiation:

The effect of fire on a human being is in the form of burns. There are three categories of burn such as
first degree, second degree and third degree burns. The consequences caused by exposure to heat
radiation are a function of:
 The radiation energy onto the human body [kW/m2];

 The exposure duration [sec];
 The protection of the skin tissue (clothed or naked body).
The limits for 1% of the exposed people to be killed due to heat radiation, and for second-degree
burns are given in the Table 6.1 below:
Table 6.1: Effects Due To Incident Radiation Intensity
Incident
Type Of Damage
Radiation (kW/m2)
0.7 Equivalent to Solar Radiation
1.6 No discomfort for long exposure
Sufficient to cause pain within 20 sec. Blistering of
4.0 skin
(first degree burns are likely)
Pain threshold reached after 8 sec. second degree
9.5
burns after 20 sec.
Minimum energy required for piloted ignition of
12.5 wood, melting
plastic tubing‟s etc.
37.5 Damage to process equipment‟s
The actual results would be less severe due to the various assumptions made in the models arising
out of the flame geometry, emissivity, angle of incidence, view factor and others. The radiative
output of the flame would be dependent upon the fire size, extent of mixing with air and the flame
temperature. Some fraction of the radiation is absorbed by carbon dioxide and water vapour in the
intervening atmosphere. Finally the incident flux at an observer location would depend upon the
radiation view factor, which is a function of the distance from the flame surface, the observer‟s
orientation and the flame geometry.
6.1.2 Assumptions made for the study (As per the guidelines of CPR 18E Purple Book)
 The lethality of a jet fire is assumed to be 100% for the people who are caught in the flame.
Outside the flame area, the lethality depends on the heat radiation distances.
 For the flash fires lethality is taken as 100% for all the people caught outdoors and for 10%
who are indoors within the flammable cloud. No fatality has been assumed outside the flash
fire area.
6.1.2.1 Overpressure:
 Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE)

The assessment aims is to determine the impact of overpressure in the event that a flammable gas
cloud is ignited. The TNO multi energy model is used to model vapour cloud explosions.
A Vapour cloud Explosion (VCE) results when a flammable vapor is released, its mixture with air
will form a flammable vapour cloud. If ignited, the flame speed may accelerate to high velocities and
produce significant blast overexposure.
The damage effects due to 20mbar, 140mbar & 210mbar are reported in terms of distance from the
overpressure source.
In case of vapour cloud explosion, two physical effects may occur:
 A flash fire over the whole length of the explosive gas cloud;
 A blast wave, with typical peak overpressures circular around ignition source.
 For the blast wave, the lethality criterion is based on:
 A peak overpressure of 0.1bar will cause serious damage to 10% of the housing/structures.
 Falling fragments will kill one of each eight persons in the destroyed buildings.
The following damage criteria may be distinguished with respect to the peak overpressures resulting
from a blast wave:
Table 6.2: Damage Due to Overpressure
Peak Overpressure Damage Type Description

0.30 bar Heavy Damage Major damage to plant equipment
structure
0.10 bar Moderate Damage Repairable damage to plant equipment
& structure
0.03 bar Significant Damage Shattering of glass
0.01 bar Minor Damage Crack in glass
Assumptions for the study (As per the guidelines of CPR 18 E Purple Books)
 Overpressure more than 0.3bar corresponds approximately with 50% lethality.

 An overpressure above 0.2bar would result in 10% fatalities.
 An overpressure less than 0.1bar would not cause any fatalities to the public.
 100% lethality is assumed for all people who are present within the cloud proper.
6.2. CONSEQUENCE RESULTS
Table 6.3: Consequence Results

Scenario: A
BLEVE
S no. Failure Source Radius Duration of Intensity of Damage distances from the
Scenarios Strength of Fireball Radiation center of the fireball
fireball inside m
fireball
kg m s kW/m2 37.5 12.5 4 kW/m2
kW/m2 kW/m2
1 18 MT Bullet
Truck - 90% 8100 60.4 8.5 190.1 111.07 188.2 306.7
capacity
2 21 MT Bullet
Truck - 90% 9200 65.5 9.1 210 120.05 235.1 350.6
capacity
3 10 MT Filled
Cylinder Truck 9000 62.5 8.8 191.9 115.3 175.3 318.4
4 600 MT
Proposed
(Mounded BLEVE not possible for mounded storage vessel
Storage Vessel
)- full capacity
Scenario: B
Heavy Cloud Dispersion (Dispersion Lel Distance Considering Release Time Of 1800 Sec)
size
mm (kg/s) DW CW DW CW
a 200/150/100 mm liquid line rupture (100%)
pipe joint)
3. from Bullet to pump at 6 Kg/ cm2) 200 260.2 26.6 82.7 4.2 25.1
(rupture assumed to be at vessel-pipe joint)
b 200/150/100 mm liquid line rupture ( 25% )
pipe joint)
c) 100 mm vapour line rupture (100%) (from Bullet 100 14.6 44 21.3 10 8.3
truck)
size
d) 100 mm Vapour return header under 150 CFM 100 14.6 44 21.5 10 8.3
Compression @ 12Kg/ cm2 )
e) 1. 50 mm Carousal return line( liquid) 50 8.9 18 13.7 4 1.9

2 50 mm Carousal return line ( Vapour ) 50 6.4 26 11.3 6 4.4
3. 80 mm unloading arm rupture( liquid) 80 12.12 25 69.1 4.2 21.6
Scenario: C
Jet Fire (If Ignited)
S no. Scenario Pipe Discharg Thermal Length Width Damage distances (m)
size e rate radiation
inside jet
DW CW DW CW DW CW
a 100/150/ 200 mm liquid line rupture (100%)
1. from bullet truck under 200 21.8 323.5 52.3 4.5 55.8 9.4 59.8 22.2 65.5 41.8
pressure of 12 Kg/ cm2
under compressor 150
CFM)
2. to Carousal @ 150Kl/ 150 12.12 286.3 39.5 3.4 41.2 6.5 44.9 15.6 49.0 29.8
Hr at 15 Kg/ cm2)
b 100 mm vapour line 100 10.06 259.4 36.2 3.1 38.1 5.5 40.7 13.3 44.3 25.9
rupture (100%)( from
Bullet truck )
c 200 mm liquid line 200 515.4 154.1 237.3 20.5 241.8 17.3 256.7 52.3 274.9 112.1
rupture (100%) (from
Bullet suction @ 6 KG/
cm2)
d 100 mm Vapour return 100 14.6 236.0 43.2 3.7 45.3 5.8 48.4 14.7 52.2 29.1
header under 150 CFM
Compression @ 12Kg/
cm2)
e 1. 50 mm Carousal return 50 12.12 247.7 39.5 3.4 41.6 5.7 44.4 14.01 48.3 27.5
line (liquid)
S no. Scenario Pipe Discharg Thermal Length Width Damage distances (m)
size e rate radiation
inside jet
DW CW DW CW DW CW
2. 80 mm unloading arm 80 6.4 227.3 29.1 2.5 30.5 3.9 32.6 9.8 35.4 19.5
rupture (liquid)
Scenario: D
Vapour Cloud Explosion
S no. Scenario Pipe Release Wind Source Cloud Amount in LEL Damage distances (m)
size rate velocity strength for radius/ Explosive distance
& dispersion Height limits
Stability
a 100/150/ 200 mm liquid line rupture
(100%)
1. from bullet 200 21.8 2/F 21.8 21.3/ 3.7 218 26 50.9 101.9 254.8
truck under
pressure of 12
Kg/ cm2,
compression @
150 CFM)
b 2. to Carousal @ 150 12.1 2/ F 12.1 13.7/ 3.1 84.7 18 Explosion unlikely
110 Kl/ Hr at 15 Qty low
Kg/ cm2)
c 200/ 100 mm liquid line rupture (25%)
1. from bullet 200 5.4 2/ F 5.4 7.1/ 2.5 21.6 10 Explosion unlikely
truck under Qty low
pressure of 12
Kg/ cm2)
S no. Scenario Pipe Release Wind Source Cloud Amount in LEL Damage distances (m)
size rate velocity strength for radius/ Explosive distance
& dispersion Height limits
Stability
2. to Carousal @ 150 3.03 2/ F 3.03 4.2/ 2.2 6.1 6 Explosion unlikely
110 Kl/ Hr at 15 Qty low
Kg/ cm2)
d 200 mm liquid 200 515.4 2/ F 515.4 97.2/ 10300 52 184.0 368.0 920.0
line rupture 20.3
(100%) (from
Bullet suction @
6 Kg/ cm2)
e 200 mm liquid 200 128.8 2/ F 128.8 51.3/ 9.7 1920 40 105.2 210.3 535.8
line rupture
(25%) (from
Bullet suction @
6 Kg/ cm2)
f 50 mm Carousal 50 12.1 2/ F 12.1 13.7/ 3.1 84.7 18 Explosion unlikely
return line Qty low
(liquid)
6.2.1 Impact Analysis:
As highlighted in table above, the maximum damage distance reached for Vapour Cloud
Explosion is for 200 mm liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet suction at 1.5F weather
condition. The maximum damage distance for VCE Fire is 184m (0.3 bar), 368m (0.1 bar) &
920m ( 0.03 bar).
6.2.2 Frequency Analysis

Frequency estimates have been obtained from historical incident data on failure frequencies and
from failure sequence models (event trees). In this study the historical data available in
international renowned databases will be used.
Reference Manual Bevi Risk Assessments version 3.2
CPR 18E – Committee for Prevention of Disasters, Netherlands
The scenario list and frequencies are available in Table No. 4
6.2.3 Event Tree Analysis

A release can result in several possible outcomes or scenarios (fire, explosions, unignited release
etc.). This is because the actual outcome depends on other events that may or may not occur
following the initial release. Event tree analysis is used to identify potential outcomes of a
release and to quantify the risk associated with each of these outcomes.
Figure 6.1: Event Tree Analysis
The above event tree is used for calculating the event frequencies and the probabilities are
defined in below:
6.2.1.1 Immediate Ignition Probability
Table 6.4: Immediate Ignition Probability

Immediate Ignition
Probability (for Delayed Ignition
Release Rate
Low / Medium Reactive Probability
Chemicals)
< 10 kg/sec 0.02 0.01
10 to 100 kg/sec 0.04 0.05
> 100 kg/sec 0.08 0.1
The above table from Bevi manual & CPR 18E is used for ignition probability.
6.2.1.2 Explosion Probability

In the sequence of events, following the ignition of a free gas cloud, an incident occurs
demonstrating characteristics of both a flash fire and an explosion. This is modeled as two
separate events: as a pure fire and a pure explosion. The fraction that is modeled as an explosion,
F explosion, is equal to 0.4.
The leak detection and shutdown systems are classified as Automatic, Semi-automatic & Manual
systems based on the leak detection facilities.
CHAPTER 7:RISK ANALYSIS
7.0 RISK CONCEPT
Risk in general is defined as a measure of potential economic loss or human injury in terms of
the probability of the loss or injury occurring and magnitude of the loss or injury if it occurs.
Risk thus comprises of two variables; magnitude of consequences and the probability of
occurrence. The results of Risk Analysis are often reproduced as Individual and groups risks and
are defined as below.
Individual Risk is the probability of death occurring as a result of accidents at a plant, installation
or a transport route expressed as a function of the distance from such an activity. It is the
frequency at which an individual or an individual within a group may be expected to sustain a
given level of harm (typically death) from the realization of specific hazards.
Such a risk actually exists only when a person is permanently at that spot (out of doors). The
individual results are based on the occupancy factor for different category of personnel‟s at that
particular location.
Individual Risk = Location Specific Individual risk Occupancy factor
Whereas, Location Specific Individual Risk corresponds to the level of damage at a particular
location or area.
The exposure of an individual is related to:
 The likelihood of occurrence of an event involving a release and Ignition of hydrocarbon,

 The vulnerability of the person to the event,
 The proportion of time the person will be exposed to the event (which is termed „occupancy‟
in the QRA terminology).
The second definition of risk involves the concept of the summation of risk from events
involving many fatalities within specific population groups. This definition is focused on the risk
to society rather than to a specific individual and is termed 'Societal Risk'. In relation to the
process operations we can identify specific groups of people who work on or live close to the
installation; for example communities living or working close to the plant.
7.1. RISK ESTIMATION
7.1.1. Individual Risk

The Individual Risk (IR) measure, expresses the risk exposure to any Individual who is
continuously present in a particular area for the whole year. The risk exposure is calculated for
all relevant hazards and summed to give the overall risks for the Plants shown below:
Individual and Societal risk of each scenarios is given below in the Table7.1
Table 7.1: Individual and Societal Risk of each scenarios
Calculated Failure
Frequency
18 MT Road tanker 1.80E-08 Negligible

1 BLEVE 21 MT Road tanker 1.80E-08 Negligible
10 MT filled Cylinder Truck 1.80E-08 Negligible
Pipeline rupture From Bullet to pump (100%) 2.50E-06 ALARP
Heavy
Cloud
2 Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck 6.00E-06 ALARP
Dispersio
Vapour return header under 150 CFM ALARP
n 3.00E-04
Compression
Carousal return line( liquid) rupture 1.00E-06 ALARP
Carousal return line ( Vapour) rupture 1.00E-06 ALARP
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) 5.48E-05 ALARP
Vapour line rupture (100%) from Bullet truck 6.00E-06 ALARP
Liquid line rupture (100%) from Bullet suction 3.13E-06 ALARP
3 Jet Fire
Vapour return header under 150 CFM ALARP
1.80E-05
Compression
Carousal return line ( liquid) rupture 1.00E-06 ALARP
Unloading arm rupture( liquid) rupture 5.48E-05 ALARP
S.No Scenario Description Failure Frequency Acceptance Criteria

3.13E-06
Pipeline rupture To Carousal (100 %) ALARP
7.50E-06
1.56E-05
Vapour Cloud
Explosion Pipeline rupture To Carousal (25 %) ALARP
4 3.75E-05
(VCE)
3.13E-06
suction
1.56E-05
suction
Carousal return line ( liquid ) rupture ALARP
1.00E-05
7.2. RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
In India, there is yet to define Risk acceptance Criteria. However, in IS 15656 – Code of Practice for
Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, the risk criteria adopted in some countries are shown.
Extracts for the same is presented below:
Table 7.2: Risk Criteria

Maximum Tolerable
Negligible Risk
Authority and Application Risk
(per year)
(per year)
VROM, The Netherlands (New) 1.0E-6 1.0E-8
VROM, The Netherlands (existing) 1.0E-5 1.0E-8
HSE, UK (existing-hazardous industry) 1.0E-4 1.0E-6
HSE, UK (New nuclear power station) 1.0E-5 1.0E-6
HSE, UK (Substance transport) 1.0E-4 1.0E-6
HSE, UK (New housing near plants) 3.0E-6 3.0E-7
Hong Kong Government (New plants) 1.0E-5 Not used
7.3. ALARP
To achieve the above risk acceptance criteria, ALARP principle was followed while suggesting risk
Reduction recommendations.
As per the risk acceptance criteria, the risk (IR) of Proposed IOCL Khordha LPG Bottling Plant falls
in ALARP region.
CHAPTER 8:RECOMMENDATION
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information provided to Ultra - Tech team and the outcome of the QRA report, it is
inferred that present risk levels posed by proposed Khordha-LPG Bottling Plant is in ALARP region.
Since the LPG bottling plant proposed is having a potential ignition source, the risk generated is high
for an individual who stays in the LPG Bottling plant and also the surrounding population.
Thus it is suggested to implement “Additional risk control measures” along with “risk control
measures already proposed in the plant” for bringing down the risk level to Acceptable from ALARP
level.
To reduce the effect of above scenario, effective measures like:
1. Additional corrosion allowance for the unloading lines to avoid leak and rupture
2. Effective preventive maintenance plan to identify corrosion and other failures
3. Hydrocarbon /Fire detectors linked to ESD to minimize the release duration to contain LFL
contour
4. Area classifications and use of Flame proof equipment‟s
5. Work permit system to have control over works carried out in the premises
6. Minimize the number trucks in TLD area to reduce the risk
7. Supervision of LPG Bulk Tanker unloading activity
The above scenario shall be used as a base for developing plan for emergency actions. Some of the
important suggested risk control measures are provided below:
1. Safety interlocks systems for pumps, compressors, bullets to be verified, counterchecked to

make sure proper operation in the event of any failures
2. Gas detectors should be appropriately located , to identify the gas leaks as quick as possible
3. Ensure elimination of all the ignition sources by provision of flame proof electrical fittings as
per hazardous area classification, and also by incorporating operational controls by prohibiting
use of spark generating equipment such as mobile phone/camera. All the tools and tackles used
in this area shall be spark proof.
4. LPG tankers shall be fitted with spark arrestors within licensed area.
5. Operation and maintenance personnel shall be adequately trained and qualified for unloading of
LPG tankers and operation of the facility.
6. Operation checklist in local language and English to be provided near operation area
7. It is suggested to have regular patrolling with critical parameters logging in order to prevent
untoward incidents
8. Procedures to verify the testing & inspection records of the LPG tanker at the entry gate shall
be developed. Vehicle speed limit within the Gas farm shall be restricted to the maximum of 5
km/hr.
9. Pipeline corridors and unloading area shall be protected with adequate crash barrier to prevent
any accidental impacts / Vehicle movement or they shall be located far away from vehicular
traffic.
10. Temporary stoppers (wheel chock‟s) to the wheel must be provided for the tanker to prevent
rolling or sudden movement of the tanker. Wooden stoppers shall be used to prevent generation
of spark.
11. Unauthorized entry into the facility shall be prohibited. Entry and exit shall be strictly
controlled
12. The TREM (Transport Emergency) card should be available in the LPG tanker so that in case of
any spillage or leakage from the tanker during transit or on road suitable emergency aid
becomes easier.
HAZOP/HAZID Study
Report
For

At
Plot No- 701, 703,704,706, 707(P)& 708 (P)
Mouza - Somanathpur, District - KhordhaState: Odisha
By
M/s. ULTRA-TECH
(ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY AND CONSULTANCY)
TH TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTERS
ABBREVIATION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 WHAT IS HAZOP.................................................................................................................................... 2
4.0 HAZOP BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 3
5.0 WHEN TO PERFORM HAZOP ............................................................................................................ 3
6.0 HAZOP PROCEDURE ............................................................................................................................ 3
7.0 SCOPE OF HAZOP STUDY .................................................................................................................. 4
8.0 DRAWINGS USED IN HAZOP SESSION ......................................................................................... 4
9.0 HAZOP STUDY/ HAZID TEAM MEMBERS ................................................................................... 5
10.0 HAZID REGISTER ................................................................................................................................ 40
11.0 HAZID METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 40
12.0 RISK RANKING .................................................................................................................................... 41
13.0 HAZID WORKSHEETS ....................................................................................................................... 43
14.0 REFERENCE .......................................................................................................................................... 43
LIST OF TABLES
Table-1: Details of Drawing used in HAZOP Session .......................................................................... 4
Table -2: Guidewords Used for HAZOP ............................................................................................... 5
Table- 3: List of Nodes Of Proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plan ....................................................... 5
Table -3 Guidewords used for the HAZID study ................................................................................ 40
Table -5 Qualitative Risk Analysis Matrix.......................................................................................... 42
Table- 6: Details of Drawing ............................................................................................................... 43
HAZOP/HAZID Study Report of Proposed LPG Bottling Plant of IOCL at Khordha, Odisha
ABBREVIATION
DMP Disaster Management Plan
ESD Emergency Shut –Down

HAC Hazard Area Classification
HAZID Hazards identification
HAZOP Hazard& Operability
HC Hydro – Carbon
IOCL Indian Oil Corporation Limited
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
MSV Mounded Storage Vessel
MOC Material of Construction
NRV Non Return Valve
PAV Pressure Actuated Valve
P&ID Pipe& Instrumentation Diagram
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
QRA Quantitative Risk Analysis
ROV Remote Operated Valve
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SRV Safety Relief Valve
TLD Tank Lorry Decanting
TRV Temperature Relief Valve
TSV Thermal Safety Valve
HAZOP/HAZID Study Report of Proposed LPG Bottling Plant of IOCL at Khordha, Odisha 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd has decided to set up a LPG Bulk Storage & Bottling Facility
(Indane Bottling Plant) at Plot No 701, 703,704,706, 707(P) & 708 (P)at Somanathpur of Khordha
district, Odisha.
The project envisages receipt ofLPG in bulk through Road tankers (18 MT& 21 Capacity) from
IPPL Haldia , HPCL Vizag Refinery &Bina Refinery. Storage of LPG in 3nos MSV of 600 MT
capacity each. The LPG bottled in cylinders at this Plant will be distributed in nearby areas.
bottlingcapacity of the plant is approximately 15000 cylinders per shift. The Plant will be running in
two shifts ( 6.00 AM to 2.00 PM and 2.00 PM to 10.00PM) LPG brought in tankers from above
mentioned source will be unloaded intostorage vessels by parking the tankers in Tanker Lorry
Decanting (TLD) gantry. The unloading operation will be carried out with the help of compressors.
During unloading of LPG, vapour from the MSV will be sucked at 10.0 kg/cm2 (max) and will be
compressed in LPG compressor to 12.0 kg/cm2. The compressed LPG vapour will pressurize the
Road Tanker and LPG ( liquid) will be transferred from Road Tanker to MSV. The Road Tanker will
be connected to liquid line and vapourlinefrom MSV by unloading hose with flow ckeck valve and
isolation valve respectively. Vapour LPG line shall be connected to the compressor through 02 ball
valves i.e. one for suction and one for discharge.
ULTRA-TECH Environmental Consultancy and Laboratory has been engaged by IOCL

forconductingHAZOP and HAZID study for proposed Khordha Bottling Plant .The Study session
was carried out for proposed project at Khordha site on 13th and 14th September, 2017 by
experienced personnel for HAZOP session & HAZID session
2.0 CONCLUSIONS
As the safety system assessed was evaluated as adequate for the hazards identified during the
workshopno specific recommendation was proposed for HAZOP session and HAZID section. Safe
guards mentioned in the study exist in the most of the cases and these are found to be in operation.
3.0 WHAT IS HAZOP
Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study is a structured and systematic

examination of a planned or existing process or operation in order to identify and
evaluate problems that may represent risks to personnel or equipment, or prevent efficient operation.
A HAZOP is a qualitative technique based on guidewords and is carried out by a multi-disciplinary

team (HAZOP team).
3.1. Definitions
 Hazard - any operation that could possibly cause a catastrophic release of toxic, flammable or
explosive chemicals or any action that could result in injury to personnel or property or both
 Operability - any operation inside the design envelope that would cause a shutdown that could
possibly lead to a violation of environmental, health or safety regulations or negatively impact
profitability.
4.0 HAZOP BACKGROUND
The basis for HAZOP was laid by ICI in 1963 and was based on so-called "critical examination"
techniques.
 First guide: "A Guide to Hazard and Operability Studies", ICI and Chemical Industries
Associations Ltd. 1977.
 First main text book: Kletz, T. A.: "Hazop and Hazan - Identifying and Assessing Process
Industry Hazards", Institution of Chemical Engineers.
 See also: Kletz, T. A.: "Hazop - past and future". Reliability Engineering
and System Safely, 55:263-266, 1997.
5.0 WHEN TO PERFORM HAZOP
The HAZOP study should be carried out as early in the formation of design basis and initial layout
preparation stage - to have influence on the overall design and operability
Alternatively after completion of detailed design, the HAZOP can also be carried out as a final check
A HAZOP study may also be conducted on an existing facility to identify modifications that should
be implemented to reduce risk and operability problems
6.0 HAZOP PROCEDURE
o Divide the system into sections (i.e., reactor, storage)
o Choose a study node (i.e., line, vessel, pump, operating instruction)
o Describe the design intent
o Select a process parameter
o Apply a guide-word
o Determine cause(s)
o Evaluate consequences/problems
o Recommend action: What? When? Who?
o Record information
7.0 SCOPE OF HAZOP STUDY
 The scope of work is to carry out HAZOP and HAZID study of Proposed Khordha LPG
Bottling Plant at Khordha
 The Hazards identification (HAZID) study is carried out to identify potential hazards from a
facility. Hazards which can harm personnel, environmental or property are identified.
 The Hazards and operability (HAZOP) study is carried out to identify the Hazards and
Operability problems.
8.0 DRAWINGS USED IN HAZOP SESSION
The drawing / documents utilized for the sessions are listed in Table -1
Table-1: Details of Drawing used in HAZOP Session

S.No Drawing Title Drawing No. Rev
1 P & ID S1-PC00128-KD-9512-0020 00
2 P& ID P1-PC00128-KD-9512-0021 01
3 P& ID P2-PC00128-KD-9512-0022 01
4 P& ID P3-PC00128-KD-9512-0023 00
5 P& ID P4-PC00128-KD-9512-0024 00
6 P& ID P5-PC00128-KD-9512-0025 00
7 P& ID P6-PC00128-KD-9512-0026 00
8 P& ID P7-PC00128-KD-9512-0027 00
9 P& ID T1-PC00128-KD-9512-0934 00
The HAZOP/HAZID facilitator did the following:
• Review of design drawings prior to attending the HAZOP;
• lead and documented the HAZOP sessions; and
• Developed a comprehensive HAZOP report and action items list.
9.0 HAZOP STUDY/ HAZID TEAM MEMBERS
The HAZOP / HAZID sessions was carried out at the premises of Indian Oil's proposed Khordha
LPG Bottling Plant, Khordha on 13th and 14th September, 2017. A team comprising of senior
officers of different department along with the professionals of ULTRA-TECH conducted the
HAZOP sessions. Review session was conducted by experienced professional of ULTRA-TECH.
Mr. A. Biswas, DGM-(LPG-E) and Mr. AnsumanRath, Manager (LPG-Project) attended both
the sessions for the study.
Table -2: Guidewords Used for HAZOP

Sl.No Guide Word
1 Flow More
2 Flow Less
3 Flow None
4 Flow Reverse
5 Flow Other than
6 Pressure High
7 Pressure Low
8 Temperature High
9 Temperature Low
10 Level High
11 Level Low
12 Start-up/ Shut –down
13 Maintenance
14 Corrosion/Erosion
15 Drawing Error
Table- 3: List of Nodes Of Proposed Khordha LPG Bottling Plan

Sl.No Node of Proposed KhordhaLPG Bottling Plan Node No.
1 LPG Receipt and storage in MSV Annexure – 1
2 LPG Pump from MSV to Filling Machine Annexure – 2
3 LPG Cylinder Filling Operation Annexure – 3
4 LPG Evacuation vessel back to MSV Annexure – 4
APPENDIX - A
HAZOP WORKSHEETS
Annexure-1
HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDY WORK SHEET
Study Title:LPG Receipt and Storage in MSV
Parameter Deviation Possible Cause Consequences Safeguards Recommendation Action by
ROV – stuck Possible over SOP based operation
open. pressurization may
lead to rupture of Level Transmitters
liquid pipeline
connected to MSV High Level alarm on MSV
causing
Changeover from Fire/Explosion.
More one Storage
Flow vessel to another
failure Process upset.
Possible over
pressurization of Gas detection system.
MSVand leading to Manned operation.
rupture connective
pipeline causing ESDs on manual
fire/explosion. Intervention.
Fire Fighting system
PSV to be provided in
MSVs.
Annexure-1 (Cont----------)
Study Title : LPG Receipt and Storage in MSV
Empty LPG Process upset loss of SOP based operation.

Bullet Truck inventory to MSV.
Local pressure indications
Process upset and PAVs and SRV in the

Flow Less / No ROV fails / close operational delays. system.
Manned operation
Inspection and
maintenance.
Loss of inventory,
possible fire / Gas detection system.
Leakage/Rupture explosion
Manned operation.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Inter MSV to LPG transfer.
Flow Reverse No Foreseen
Hazards as NRVs
provided
Flow Other Than Water present in Process upset. No Sampling at TLD bay by
LPG Bullet safety hazards rotogauge.
Truck
Manned operation.
SOP based operation
Inspection.
Water draining of LPG

Bullet before unloading
operation.
Parameter Deviation Possible Cause Consequences Safeguards Recommendation Action
by
High ambient No Safety Hazard as
Temperature. system designed for
maximum ambient
temperature.
Possible overheating Gas monitoring system.

External Fire. may result in over
pressurization of the SRV on MSV
system and possible
damage to piping / PAVs in the system.
Pressure equipment.
High Sprinkler system to produce
cooling effects.
Level Transmitters provided
ROV – stuck Possible over High Level alarm on MSV.

open./ pressurization of the
Changeover MSV leading to rupture Pressure gauge on MSV.
from one Storage of piping, causing
vessel to another Fire/Explosion Gas detection system.
failure
Manned operation.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
PSV to be provided on MSVs
Low ambient No Safety Hazard as

Temperature system designed for
maximum ambient
temperature
Pressure Low
Process upset
Empty LPG
Bullet Truck SOP
Loss of inventory,
Leakage/Rupture possible fire /
explosion Gas detection system.
Manned operation.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Inter MSV to LPG

transfer.
Firefighting System.

Temperature maximum ambient
High temperature.
Possible
External Fire overheating, damage
to equipment , High Temperature Alarm
piping
PAVs in the pipeline.
Sprinkler system.
Firefighting system.
Low ambient No Safety Hazard as Low Temperature Alam

Temperature Low Temperature system designed for
maximum ambient
temperature.
ROV – stuck Possible over SOP based operation

open. pressurization of the
MSV, leading to Level Transmitters
rupture of piping
causing High Level alarm onMSV.
Fire/Explosion.
Pressure gauge on MSV.
High Gas detection system.

Level
Manned operation.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Changeover from Process upset.

one Storage Possible over -do-
vessel to another pressurization of
failure MSV and leading to
rupture of piping
causing
fire/explosion

by
Drainage valve Possible loss of SOP based operation.
left open. inventory may lead
to Fire/Explosion. Inspection and maintenance.
Drainage is strictly manned.
Quick Shutoff with lock

protection system.
ROV fails close Possible over
pressurization PAVs ,
Level Low
leading to fire / Inspection and maintenance
explosion.
Empty LPG Manned operation.
Process upset loss of
Bullet Truck
inventory to MSV.
Loss of inventory Local Pressure indications.

Leakage/Rupture may lead to Gas detection system.
Fire/Explosion Manned operation.
ESDs on manual Intervention.
Inter MSV to LPG transfer.
Firefighting System
by
Start –up / shut No Foreseen
down Hazards
Maintenance No Foreseen
Hazards
Corrosion/ Presence of Possible leakage / Suitable MOC.
Erosion impurities. rupture
Preventive Inspection and
maintenance
Adequate design.
Drawing Errors P& IDs to be IOCL

updated as per
existing
construction.
Annexure-2
Study Title :LPG Pump from MSV to Filling Machine
ROV – stuck Possible over SOP based operation.

open. pressurization in the
Flow More system. Gas detection system.
Manned operation.
Possible hose / line
damage, may lead to PAVs
rupture
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Annexure-2 (Con--------)
Study Title : LPG Pump from MSV to Filling Machine

by
Transfer pump Possible over SOP based operation.
trips. pressurization of MSVupto Gas detection system.
(Compressor is inlet of pump, leading to Manned operation.
Flow Less/no running). rupture of piping resulting SRVs on MSV
in fire / explosion. PAVs in the system.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Inspection and
maintenance.
Pump strainer Possible pump damage/
Choked. Possible over PSV to be provided on
pressurization of MSVs
MSV,leading to rupture of
piping
Resulting fire /explosion.
Loss of feed to SOP based operation.
pump. Possible vapour locking in Dispersion of vapour
the pumps, leading to dry from the pump suction
running of pumps. line to a safe height.
Leakage /
Rupture Gas detection system
Inventory Loss leading to
fire / explosion. Fire Fighting system
Annexure-2 (Cont…..)
Study Title :LPG Pump from MSV to Filling Machine
No Foreseen
Flow Reverse Hazards as NRVs
provided
Flow Other No Foreseen

Than Hazards
Study Title:LPG Pump from MSV to Filling Machine

maximum ambient
temperature. Gas detection system.
PAVs in the entire system.
External Fire Sprinkler system.
Possible overheating,
Firefighting system
damage to equipment ,
DMP.
piping
ROVs Stuck SOP based operation.

Pressure High Possible over Gas detection system.
open. pressurization in the Manned operation.
system. PAVs
ESDs on manual
Possible hose / line Intervention.
damage, may lead to Fire Fighting system
rupture.
SOP based operation.
Possible over Gas detection system.
Transfer pump pressurization of MSVupto Manned operation.
trips. inlet of pump, leading to SRVs on MSV
(Compressor is rupture, resulting in fire / PAVs in the system.
running). explosion. ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Inspection and maintenance.

maximum ambient
temperature.
Low Empty MSV Process upset SOP based operation.

Pressure
Pumps trips.
Possible over Gas detection system.
pressurization of MSVupto Manned operation.
inlet of pump, leading to PAVs in the system
rupture, resulting in fire / ESDs on manual
explosion Intervention.
Leakage / Inventory loss leading to

Rupture fire / explosion
Inspection and maintenance.

maximum ambient
temperature.
Temperature High
External Fire Possible

overheating, damage
to equipment ,
piping Gas detection system.
Sprinkler system.
Firefighting.
Temperature Low Low ambient No Safety Hazard as

maximum ambient
temperature.
Level High No Foreseen

Hazards
Level Low No Foreseen

Hazards
Composition Other than No Foreseen

Hazards
Start –up / shut No Foreseen

down. Hazards
Hazards
Erosion impurities. rupture Preventive Inspection and
maintenance.
Adequate design.
Drawing Errors P& IDs to be IOCL
updated as per
existing
Construction
Annexure-3
Study Title:LPG Cylinder Filling Operation
Running of Possible over SOP based operation.

multiple pumps pressurization in the
Flow More system leading to Gas detection System
fire /explosion
Manned operation.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Loss of Feed to No safety hazards,

Carousel. operational delay
Flow Less/No
Leakage / Possible loss of
Gas detection system.
Rupture inventory may result
in fire / explosion
Vapour extraction unit with
suction points.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Inspection and
maintenance.
Cylinder not Possible over SOPs

being filled by pressurization in the
filling guns system, leading to Manned operation.
Flow Reverse
leakage /rupture,
causing fire / Gas detection system.
explosion
Provision of bypass line
with differential pressure
valve and carousal return
line.
Inspection and
maintenance.
Flow Other No Foreseen

Than Hazards
Study Title: LPG Cylinder Filling Operation

maximum ambient
temperature.
Pressure High
Possible damage to
cylinders/ piping. Gas detection system.
External Fire
May lead to domino
effect ESDs on manual
intervention.
Firefighting system
DMP
Loss of Feed to No safety hazards,

Carousel. operational delay.
Pressure Low
Leakage / Possible loss of Vapour extraction unit with
Rupture inventory may result suction points.
in fire / explosion
Gas detection system at
strategic location.
ESDs on manual
intervention.

maximum ambient
temperature.
Temperature High
Possible damage to
cylinders/ piping.
External Fire Gas detection system.
May lead to domino
effect
ESDs on manual
intervention.
DMP
Temperature Low Low ambient No Safety Hazard as

maximum ambient
temperature.
Malfunctioning Possible over filling Gross weighing of

of load cell. of cylinders. May cylinder to check.
lead to fire /
explosion. Gas detection system.
Level High
ESDs on manual
intervention.
DMP
Faulty load cell. Process upset /
Operational delay.
Leakage / Possible loss of
Vapour extraction unit with
Rupture inventory may result
in fire / explosion suction points.
ESDs on manual
intervention.
Level Low Inspection and
maintenance.

Hazards.
Start up/ No Foreseen

shut down Hazards
Maintenance LPG present de- Possible leakage. SOP based operation.

shaping of scrap Leading to fire /
explosion. Manned operation.
DMP

Preventive Inspection and
Maintenance.
Drawing P& IDs to be IOCL

Errors updated as per
existing
construction.
Annexure-4
Study Title: LPG Evacuation Vessel Back to MSV
Flow More Over Rupture/Leakage ROV Provided

pressurization of
the vessel SOP
Annexure-4 (Cont……….)
Study Title :LPG Evacuation Vessel Back to MSV
Blocked Evacuation Possible over High discharge pressure trip

compressor outlet. pressurization High discharge temperature
upstream. trip
Inspection and maintenance
SRV in the system
PAVs in the system
Manned operation
Flow Less Fire Fighting system
ROV fails. Possible over

pressurization
upstream. PAVs in the system.
Leakage/Rupture
Loss of inventory,
possible to fire /
explosion. Gas detection system
Manned operation.
ESDs on manual
Intervention.
Manned operation.
Flow Reverse No Foreseen

Hazards.
Flow Other than Water present in No Safety Hazard

LPG Cylinder.
High ambient No Safety Hazard

temperature as system designed
for maximum
Pressure High ambient temperature
External Fire Possible overheating

damage to Gas detection system.
equipment / piping.
Safety hazards. Sprinkler System to
produce cooling effect.
ESDs on manual
intervention.
DMP.
Loss of inventory,
Leakage/Rupture possible to fire / Inspection and
explosion. maintenance
Pressure Low
SRV in the system
Manned operation
ESD

maximum ambient.
Temperature High
Possible overheating
External Fire damage to
equipment / leakage
piping. Safety High Temperature Alarm
hazards.
Sprinkler System to
produce cooling effect.
ESDs on manual
intervention.
Firefighting system
DMP

Temperature Low minimum ambient
temperature.
Level High No Foreseen

Hazards
Level Low Leakage/Rupture Loss of inventory, Gas detection system.

possible to fire /
explosion. Manned operation.
ESD

Hazards
Start-up/ Shout No Foreseen

down Hazards
Hazards

Preventive Inspectionand
maintenance.
Drawing Errors No Foreseen P& IDs to be IOCL
Hazards updated as per
existing
construction.
10.0 HAZID REGISTER
The HAZID Study is a high level qualitative Risk Assessment which is commonly utilized to
identify potential hazards from a facility. Which can harm personnel, environmental or property are
identified. The HAZID assessed the consequences taking into account the mitigation provided in the
design and then defined any action necessary to further mitigate risk to acceptable level.
11.0 HAZID METHODOLOGY
The HAZID was performed by a multidisciplinary team from IOCL to ensure that the HAZID
review was comprehensive. The agreed action items were recorded on the HAZID worksheets.
The Drawings and support documents were referred to as appropriate. The Study progressed through
the following steps.
a. The design intent and normal operating conditions of the area.
b. Identify possible causes and consequences of the hazards. A hazard can be considered “
meaningful “ if it has a credible cause and can result in harmful consequences.
c. Identify any existing safeguards, mitigation and control measures included in the design.
d. Carry out a ranking of the hazards based on its safety or environmental impacts.
e. Identify recommendation and action parties if further mitigation is required. The guidewords
used in the study are summarized in Table-4.
Table -3Guidewords used for the HAZID study

Sl. No Guidewords
1 Un-ignited Hydrocarbon Release
2 High / Low Pressure
3 High / Low Temperature
4 Dropped Object
5 Maintenance
6 Confined Spaces
7 Access / Egress/ Escape / Evacuation
8 Extreme Weather
9 Radioactivity
10 Explosives
11 Sabotage/ Piracy / Acts of Terrorism/ Theft
12 Electrical Fire
12.0 RISK RANKING
Based on the estimated frequencies and consequence the identified hazards were then assessed and
ranked accordingly to their severity using the matrix presented in the Table -5.
The HAZID risk ranking is performed for consequence to people, asset, environment and reputation.
Table -5Qualitative Risk Analysis Matrix
Annual Frequency
Consequence of Hazard
A B C D E
Severity People Assets Environment <0.00001 0.0001- 0.001- 0.01-0.001 >0.01
(P) (A) 0.00001 0.0001
0 No injury No damage No effect L L L L L
1 Slight injury Slight damage Slighteffect L L L L M
2 Minor injury Minor damage Minoreffect L L L M M
3 Major injury Localiseddamage Localisedeffect L L M M H
4 Single Fatality Major damage Major effect L M M H H
5 Multiple Extensive Extensive effect M M H H H

Fatalities damage
13.0 HAZID WORKSHEETS
The HAZID sessions were recorded on worksheets as presented in Appendix –B. in the cause
column all the potential causes which contribute to particular hazard were recorded. If any
safeguards / mitigation measures are provided to prevent or minimize risk or further escalation, then
they were documented in the “Preventive and Mitigation Measures” column. In the absence of
adequate safeguards for the hazards identified relevant recommendation from the team were noted in
the “Recommendations” column.
14.0 REFERENCE
Table- 6: Details of Drawing
S.No Drawing Title Drawing No. Rev
1 P & ID S1-PC00128-KD-9512-0020 00
2 P& ID P1-PC00128-KD-9512-0021 01
3 P& ID P2-PC00128-KD-9512-0022 01
4 P& ID P3-PC00128-KD-9512-0023 00
5 P& ID P4-PC00128-KD-9512-0024 00
6 P& ID P5-PC00128-KD-9512-0025 00
7 P& ID P6-PC00128-KD-9512-0026 00
8 P& ID P7-PC00128-KD-9512-0027 00
9 P& ID T1-PC00128-KD-9512-0934 00
10 Layout 1058-E-KHU00-CIV010-00001 01
APPENDIX B- HAZID WORKSHEETS
HAZID Study
Guideword Cause Major Effects Preventive & FREQ CONS RISK Recommendation Action by
Mitigation Measures
Operator may Gross weightmethod for
be exposed to cylinder filling.
HC vapours
Over Filling Continuous monitoring
of LPG of filling operation B 2 L
Unignited cylinder
HC Release Gas detection system.
Vapour extraction unit
ESD on manual
intervention
PPEs
DMP
HAZID Study
Mitigation Measures
Excess flow
checkValves.
PAVs
Un-ignited Loss of Gas detection system.

HC Release Leakage or containment,
Rupture Possible operator Vapour extraction unit
exposure to HC with
vapours
ESD on manual
intervention
PPEs
DMP
HAZID Study
Mitigation Measures
Weighting method for
cylinder filling.
Continuous monitoring
of filling operation.
Ignited HC Possible fire /
Over Filling explosion , Gas detection system.
of LPG safety hazard
cylinder ESD on manual
intervention.
Fire fighting system.
PPEs
DMP
Toxic No Foreseen
exposure Hazards
HAZID Study
Guideword Cause Major Preventive & FREQ CONS RISK Recommendation Action by
Effects Mitigation Measures
High Possible wear Proper design

fluctuations in and tear due accounting for historical
ambient to thermal weather data. B 2 L
temperature expansion and
High /Low contraction. PAVs in the entire
Temperature facility.
High Temperature
Alarm
External fire Possible B 4 M
system failure
leading to
consequence Gas detection system.
escalation
Fire fighting system.
HAZID Study
Mitigation Measures
Maintenance Inadequate / in Possible failure. Proper maintenance

proper Safety hazard procedures and C 2 L
maintenance and equipment / schedule
of equipment / instrument
instrument damage
SOP
Confined Inspection & Personnel injury
Spaces maintenance Hot & Cold work 3 L
permit.
Use of explosive meter

before entering.
HAZID Study
Access / Emergency Escalation of Periodic fire mock
Egress/ scenario ( Fire / hazardous drills.
Escape/ Explosion) situation
Evacuation Proper training for B 4 M
emergency scenarios
Emergency exit.
Emergency Assembly
Point.
Mutual aid agreement.
ESD on manual
intervention
HAZID Study
Lightning Personnel Proper design A 3 L
injury and accounting for
Extreme High wind possible historical weather data
weather speed damage to
equipment. Proper earthling of
Earthquake equipment
Heavy rains Lightning arrestors on

high mast towers /
sheds
Adequate drainage
system.
No Foreseen
Radioactivity Hazards
HAZID Study
Mitigation Measures
Personnel injury. Access control and
Security.
May lead to
property Frisking of all visitors. B 3 L
damage.
Sabotage / Pilferage / Periodic mock drills.
Piracy /Acts sabotage
of Terrorism Quick response team.
Bomb threat contingency

plan.
Security contingency
plan.
HAZID Study
Electrical Suitable electrical
fitting fittings.
failures. Fire / C 3 M
Explosion Electrical tripping.
Electrical fire Short Circuit.
Use of insulating mats
Unsuitable for working in electrical
electrical areas.
fitting
Fire extinguishers.
Trained and certified

operators.
PPEs
Material Safety Data Sheet
LPG
1.Chemical Identification
Chemical Name : LPG Synonyms : Liquefied Petroleum Gas.
Chemical classification : Flammable Gas - Category 1,

Gases under Pressure - liquefied gas,
Carcinogenicity - Category 1B,
Mutagen city - Category 1B
Specific Target OrganToxcity
(Single Exposure) - Category 3
Trade name : LPG U.N.No. : 1203
Formula : Mixture MAINLY Propane & Butane,

Component C.A.S No. Weight
Propane (C3 H8) 74-98-6 60-90%
Butane (C4 H10) 106-97-8 10-30%
Propane Propylene 115-07-1 1-5%
Isobutene (C4 H10) 75-28-5 1-5%
1,3- Butadiene (C4 H6) 106-99-0 0-02%
Shipping name :Liquified Petroleum gas.
Regulated identification :LPG.Hazardous waste ID No. : NA. Hazchem No. :Class2.1
Hazardous Ingredients:-
Hazardous Approximate C.A.S. No. LD50/LC50 Exposures

Ingredients. Concentration(%) specify species Limits.
& Route.
a) Butane 50-60 106-97-8 Not available/inh 4hrs 1000 lpm.(OEL)

& 658 g/m3. 1000 lpm(TLV1)
b) Ethane <5 74-84-0 Not available. 1000 lpm(TLV1)
c) Propane 40-50 74-98-6 Not available 1000 lpm.
(OEL,TLV1)
[ OEL= 8 hr Alberta Occupational Exposure Limit ]
[ TLV = Threshold Limit Value ( 8 hrs) ]
1
As Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Gases
2. Physical & Chemical data
Physical state Liquefied Gas

Boiling Range / points (-)270c
Melting / freezing points (-) 170OC to (-) 187Oc

Appearance &Odour Colorless, Odorless ( or may have
Mercaptanodour)
Vapour Pressure(KPA) 1100 @ 200C
Vapour Density (Air-1) 1.6 - 2.0
Solubility in water Negligible
Specific Gravity water 0.53
PH Not applicable.
Evaporation rate Not available.
Percent Volatiles, by volume 100
Odour Threshold (PPM) Range from 2500 to 5000.
Coefficient of water / Oil Distribution <0.1
Initial Boiling point & range -0.50c (31.1F) at 1,013.25 hPa
Relative density 0.56 at 150c
3. Fire and Explosion Hazards Data:
Appearance
Flammability Yes
LEL by volume 1.8% to 5.3%
UEL by volume 8.5% to 15%
Flash Point (-)560c to (-)600c
Auto ignition 4100c-5400c
TDG Flammability classification Class 2.1
Sensitivity to impact Na.
Sensitivity to Static discharge Yes, May ignite
Means of extinction Foam, CO2, dry chemical Powder, Explosive
accumulations can build up in areas of poor
ventilation.
Special Procedure Use water spray to cool fire exposed containers
and disperse Gas if Leak has not ignited. If safe
To do, cut off fuel and allow flame to burn out.
HazardousPloymerisation :
Combustible Liquid : Yes Explosive material : Yes Corrosive material : No
Flammable material : Yes Oxidizer : NA Other : NA
Pyrophoric material : NA Organic peroxide : NA
4. Reactivity Data
Chemical stability : Stable

Condition : Not applicable
Incompatibility with other material : Chlorine and other strong oxidizing agents.
Reactivity :Yes
Conditions : heat, strong sunlight
Hazardous Reaction Product : On fire it will liberate some amount carbon monoxide, and
Carbon-di-oxide.
5. Health Hazards Data
Routes of Entry : Inhalation ,eye contact.

Effects of Exposure symptoms : Inhalation can cause head ache, disorientation, dizziness
drossiness and possibly unconsciousness. Evidence exists that
butane and propane can cause these effects at concentrations
for below those require for oxygen deficiency, for example 10%
LEL and above. As concentration increases, oxygen deficiency
and asphyxiation may occur. Rapidly expanding gas are
vaporized liquid may cause frostbite to skin and eyes.
Emergency Treatment : in case of contact with Skin flush with fresh with fresh water ,
remove containment clothing, in case of excessive inhalation
move the victim to fresh air, obtain medical assistance.
Sensitization to Product : No
Exposure limit of Product : 1000 lpm(OEL,TLV)
Irritancy : Not available.
Synergistic materials : None reported.
Chronic exposure : Weakness, coughing, labored breathing, headache confusion
nausea/vomiting convulsions heart rate and pulse variations
coma respiratory failure.
NFPA Hazards Health Flammability Instability Special

Signals 2 4 0 none
HMIS ratings Health Flammability physical hazards

1 4 2
6. Preventive measures:
Personal Protective equipment : use Positive pressure self contained breathing apparatus
Or supplied air breathing apparatus when entering areas where
high concentration may be presents.
a) Gloves: Insulated gloves.
b) Respiratory Protection: SCBA ar SABA.
c) Eye: splash goggles and face shield if SCBA or SABA not warn.
Handling and storage Precautions : Aroid contact with liquid cooled equipment, Avoid inhalation,
avoid sparking condition store in a cool, dry, well ventilated
area away from heat, strong sunlight and ignition source.
Keep away from fire, sparks & heated surfaces no smoking near
areas where material is stared or handled. The product should
only be stored and handled in areas with intrinsically safe
electricalclassification.
7. Emergency and First aid measures:
Suitable Fire Extinguishing media : Foam, dry chemical powder, co2, containers which are
not cooled with water spray
Extinguishing media to avoid : water
Caution about specific danger in case of : Danger of violent reaction or explosion, vapors
Fire and fire fighting procedures may travel considerable distances and cause
subsequent ignition. Vapors are heavier than air, may
cumulate along the round in enclosed spaces – danger
of explosion when burning; it emits carbon monoxide
& CO2 and irritant fumes.
Fire Special procedures : Shut off leak, if safe to do so,. Keep non –involved
people away from spill site. Issue warning “
FLAMMABLE” . Eliminate all sources of ignition.
Unusual Hazards : Vapor heavier than Air it will spread along the
the ground and collect in sewer.
ExposureFirst Aid measures : Skin contact ; in freeze burn occurs, gently

Bathe affected area in warm water (38-43)0C.
Do not rub get medical attention
Eye :Immediately flash with large amounts of

Luke warm water for 15 minutes, lifting upper
& lower lids at intervals. Seek medical attention
If irritation persists.
Inhalation: Remove to fresh air, give oxygen, artificial
respiration or CPR needed seek medical attention
Ingestion :Usually no effect by this Route
Antidotes/Dosages : NA
Spills Steps to be taken : Shut off leak , if safe to do so, Keep non –
Involved people away from spillage site.
Eliminate all sources of ignition. Prevent spill
entering in to sewers, for Major spillage contact
emergency services.
Waste disposal Method : NA

t
f
l r ' FAX:256282212560955
Tet :0674-2564033
) FAX : A674 -2564033t 2564573
EPABX : 25619O9t2562847
E - m a i l p: a r i b o s h@
l ospcboard.org
(.)DtsltA Website: wwvv usljcuudru urLl
S T A T EP O L L U T I O NC O N T R O LB O A R D ,O D I S H A
I D E P A R T M E N TO F F O R E S T& E N V I R O N M g N Tc, O V E R N M E N T O F O D T S H A I
, i l a k a n t h aN a g a r , U n l t - V l l l
P a r i b e s h B h a w a n ,A " / 1 1 8N
B h u b a n e s w a r- 7 5 1 0 1 2 . I N D I A
No. I tlrt6 t IND-||-PH-749 D a t e :0 1 - o B - ? o t 6

Bv Reqd.Pos t
To
The Member Secretary.
SEIAA,Odisha,Qr. No 5 RF -2l1,
Unit - lX, Bhubaneswar-22
Sub: Proceedingsof Public hearing in respect of EnvironmentalAssessmentof M/s. Indian Oii

Corporation Ltd. for construction of LPG Bulk Storage (1B00MT) and Botfling Facitity
(lndane Bottling Plant)at plot No.708 and 707(P) at Somanathpur village in Khordha
district - regarding.
Sir.
Invitinga reference to the above,thisis to informthatpublichearingof the abovementioned

prolectproposedby M/s. Indian Oil CorporationLtd. for constructionof LPG Bulk Storage
( 1 8 0 0 M T )a n d B o t t l i n g F a c i l i t y ( l n d a n e B o t t l i n g P l a n t ) a t p l o t N o . 7 0 8 a n d t O T t P ) a t
Somanathpurvillage in Khordha district was conductedon 20-07-2018at 11-00AM at
proposedLPG Plant Project Site over ptot no.707(P)& 708 of village Somanathpurunder
KaipadarGram Panchayatof Khordha district in accordance with the Ministryof Environment.
Forest& ClimateChange,Govt.of lndia,EIANotification No SO-1533(E) dt 14 09 2006
As per the above notification,
noticeinvitingcomments.views,objection,and suggestions
from the publicin respectof the above projectwas publishedin newspapersnamelyThe Dharitri
(Odia)on 13-06-2018 and The Timesof India(English)on 14-O6-2018 respectively.
" Further03 nos. of representations were receivedduring publichearingwhich are enclosed
herewithfor kind referenceand furtheractionduringthe consideration
of environmental
clearance
A copy of the proceedings of the publichearingalong with the followingdocurnents
are
enclosedfor kindinformation
and necessaryactionat yourend.
1 VideoCD of publichearing
2-. Statementof issuesraisedby publichearingmeetingand commentsof applicantpreparedin
locallanguageand in English.
3. Copiesof the newspaperadvertisement.
4 Listof personswho participated in the publichearing.
5 Viewsand suggestions fromthe publicreceivedby the Boardduringthe publichearrng
6 About 3nos of representationswere received by the RegronalOfficer, SPC Boa6d
Bhubaneswar. (Enclosed as Annexure- A).
Yoursfaithfully
Encl:As above
MEMBERSECRETARY
P.T.O...
lt2//
Memo No ttt
--ldt3f' .jB a,"6
c_opyof the proceedings of
Forest& Env.Department.Govt. of Odisha ,Pupti-chearing forwarded to the Addt. Chief
Secretary,
for information and necessary action.
Encl:As above
M e m o r y o_ 9 q : l g /dt 01.o$-aorr
copy fonarardedto t,eAooitior;iEirectaE;ern
A-3, c handrasekharpur, Bhubane"*", roi inio;"ti; Regionaloffice,MoEF& cc Govt.of India,
;;'r[""""".y action.
M e m o! o Q ttq q
9:Lr :i"rgwithcopyor p6Geoilgt
--Oii of public hearing forwarded to Sri.
Dy.General Manager, Mis. Indian A.Biswas,
Gorporation Ltd., Indian oil Bhavan,
Chandrasekharpur,-Bhu
baneswar,fhorOt," for information. NZ.
Encl:As above
MEMBER
rrfirffljt
I
Annexure- A
Name of the persons who submitted representationsduring public hearing

at 11-00AM for M/SlndianOil CorporationLtd.Khordha.
conductedon 20-07-2018
1. Ms.SandyaRani Dash,DaleiputViltrage,-Khordha
Villagers,Khordha.
& Somnathpur
Sri SrikantaNayak & Villagersof Deulatangi
Village,Khordha,
Villagersof Kuradmall
(t
M /S'
PR O C EE D I N GS OF T H E P U B L IC HEARINGMEETINGFOR THE PROJECTOF
M/S' INDIAN OIL
I N D I A NO I L C OR P OR A T IONL IMITEDFOR THE PROJECT OF
OF LPG BU LK
C O R P O R A T ION L IMIT E D F OR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
PLANT) AT
s r o R A G E ( 1 80 0 MT ) A N D B OT T LTNGFACr Llw ( INDANE BOTTLING
20.07'2018AT
SOMANATHPURVILLAGE IN KHORDHA DISTRICTHELD ON DTD.
PLOT NO' 7 07( P)
1 1 . 0 0A . M . AT P R OP OS E DL P G PLANT PROJECT SITE OVER
PANCHAYAT OF
&708 OF VILLAGE SOMANATHPURUNDER KAIPADAR GRAMA
K H O R D H AT A H S ILIN K H OR D H ADISTRICT.
for
The public hearing meeting of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
and bottling
establishmentof proposed constructionof LPG bulk storage (1800 MT)
was
facility(lndane BottlingPlant) at somanathpurVillage in the districtoT Khordha
project site over
conductedon dtd.20.07.2018at 11.00 A.M at proposed LPG plant
of
plot no.707(P)& 708 of village Somanathpurunder Kaipadar Grama Panchayat
Additional District
Khordha Tahsil in Khordha district. Sri Manas Ranjan Samal,
publicwho were
Magistrate,Bhubaneswarpresidedover the meeting.He welcomedthe
and
presentat the venue for participatingin the meeting.Dr. B-B Dash, Regionalofficer
Bhubaneswar
other Officialsof odisha State PollutionControl Board, Regionaloffice,
in respectof the
organizedand conductedthe publichearingmeeting.The publichearing
with the EIA
above projectwas held as per the scheduleand at the venue in accordance
public hearing
Notifications.o.1533 (E) dt.14.09.06and subsequentnotifications.The
publicaddresssystem
meetingwith regardto date, place & time was announcedin the
publichearingwas
apartfrom its publicationin local dailies.The processfollowedfor the
public hearingmeeting is
adequate.The attendancesheet of the public present in the
the public hearing
annexed in Annexure- l. Around 250 numbersof personsattended
numbers
meetingand 143 numberof.personshave signed the attendancesheet. Nine
givenin Annexure-ll'
of personsdeliveredtheirviews whose listand their signaturesare
State
At the outset Dr. Binod BihariDash, Regionalofficer, Regionaloffice of
pollutionControl Board, Bhubaneswarwelcomedall the public presentin the meeting'
He briefly describedthe objective, processesand proceduresfollowed for conducting

public
such public hearing. He also briefed about the objectivesof conductingthe
of the
hearingas per the EIA NotificationNo S.O. 1533(E)of Dt.14thSeptember2006
Indi aand
M i n i s t r yo f E n vi ro n me nat n d F o re sts& climate change ( MoEF CC) , Govt' of
bottling
the detailabout the proposedconstructionof LPG Bulk storage( 1800 MT) and
for
f a c i l i t y( l n d a n e B o ttl i n gP l a n t). H e also infor medihat the date, tim e and venu e
L
i U
! l
^16
conductingthe public hearingfor Proposedconstructionof LPG Bulk Storage ( 1800 MT)

and bottling facility (lndane Bottling Plant) of lndian Oil Corporation Limited was
advertisedin Odiya daily "The Dharatri" on dtd.13.06.2018and in Englishdaily "The
T i m e s o f I n d i a " o n d td .1 4 .0 6 .2 018.
He also intimatedthat the date, time & venue of public hearing has been
announcedto the publicin surroundingvillagesby publicaddresssystem.
Sri Manas Ranjan Samal, AdditionalDistrictMagistrate,Bhubaneswar,briefed

the audienceabout the importanceof such hearing and invited the project proponent
to make a presentationon the proposedprojectprior to the presentation/ deliberation
by the public.He also invitedthe publicto offer their views, objections,opinionsand
suggestionsregardingthe projectrelatedto environmentalissues and also they may
give written representationreflectingtheir views. The Additional District Magistrate,
Bhubaneswarexplainedto public that those who want to participatein the public
hearingmay put forth their views about the impact on the environmentdue to the
proposedproject.
Dr. B.B Dash RegionalOfficer,RegionalOfficeof State PollutionGontrolBoard,

Bhubaneswaralso describedabout the agenda of the meeting. He requestedthe
representativesof M/s. Indian Oil CorporationLtd. to give descriptionabout the project
.. and environmentalpollutioncontrol measuresand EnvironmentalManagementPlan
proposedto be taken by the projectproponent.
Shri B.K. Pathy, Chief Manager (LPG-Engg.)of M/s. Indian Oil Corporation
Limitedwelcomedthe Officialsand Public.He explainedthe projectdetailsand EMP
which is givenas follows:
of the projecton the presentation
M/s. Indian Oil CorporationLtd. (IOCL)is a MaharatnaPSU in the oil & gas
sector and is engaged in the business of refining and marketing of petroleum
products.IOCL is having about 91 LPG bottlingplants which serve every cornerof the
country.INDANE(the trade name of LPG of IOCL)gas is suppliedto the consumers
througha networkof about 5,456distributors.
As of now there are two LPG Bottlingplantsat Balasoreand at Jharsuguda.With the

LPG Bottlingfacilitiesin Odisha,IOCLis unableto rneetthe grovringdemand
pr-esent
of LPG in the State. In order to increaseits new customerbase and to serve the
J
bn
existingcustomersin a betterway M/s IndianOil CorporationLtd. are augmenting
theirexistingbottlingplantsand settingup new plants.with the abovein view
locl
proposes to set up a greenfieldLpG bottlingplantat Khordha.
* The ProjectSiteis locatedat Khurdhawhichis at about1Bkm fromKhurdha

RoadRailwaystationand g km awayfrom Khordhatown.
* The ProjectSite is well connectedby roadthroughNH-Sand SouthEastern
RailwayLine betweenHowrahto Chennar.
* Nearestdomesticand international
airportis BijuPatnaikInternationalAirport
at Bhubaneswar.Nearestportis at paradeepport.
n Latitude
/ AEfd :20"07'54.47"N
* Latitude/ AEf6 : 85.34'28.28"E
DETAILS
OFTHEPROJECT:
;;;;.#;;;;il;,,*"""",r,*,
ct no: 70L,703,704,706,707(p)
& ,
pur;Tehsli:Khordha;Dist:Khor.dha i
,
" '- **--'
, Water 3 :,
i Requiremeht
/ ,. fotal:Waterrequiremgnt
is 12 m /day.Demandwill
be metthroughborewelt.
Power ; Maximumpowerdemand:400 KVASource:The
De m a n d/ i substationof the Odisha StateElectricity
Board,
j standby DG Setsare proposed
Technology& r nrsprantwillbe engagedprirnarily

for receipt,
Process/ storageandfillingof LpG,Cylinder.s
to meetthe
domesticand industrialdemandof the region
I
Mitigation Measures- Constructionphase

* Construction materialswill be transportedin coveredtrucks,as necessary.
* S p r i n k l i nogf w a t e r i n d u s t p r o n ea c t i v i t i eisn c l u d i n g
t r a n s p o r t a t i oonn u n m e t a l l e d
roads.
* Continuousefforts to conservefreshwater
{' water supplyand sanitationfacilitiesfor labourin work site.
* No untreateddischargewill be ailowedto meet water courses.
* S t o r a g es p a c ef o r c o n s t r u c t i o m n aterials.
D e v e l o p m e not f g r e e n e r yf r o m e a r l yd a y so f t h e p r o j e c tc o n s t r u c t i o n
Mitigation Measures- Operationphase
A I RP O L L U T I O N
* s t a c ko f r e q u i r c dh e i g h tf o r s t a n d b yD Gs e t sa ss p e c i f i e cbly c p c B .
" : ' G r e e n e r ya l o n gp l a n tb o u n d a r yt o c h e c kf u g i t i v ed u s te m i s s i o n .
ttU
* Entireunloadingoperationof atlTankTrucksis leakfree.

Water PollutionControl
* Wastewater managementphilosophyis basedon "Minimum Discharge"Concept.
* within the norrns.
Water qualitywill be maintainecj
* Wastewater generatedduring mockfire drills(onlyonce in a month) is passed
throughvapourtrap and dischargedinto naturaldrainage/rainwaterharvesting
ponds.
* Duringrainyseason,the rain water is dischargedthroughproperlydesignedstorm
water drain after passingthroughvapourtrap/rainwaterharvestingponds.
NOISEPOLLUTIONMTTTGATION
* All equipmentwill be procuredwith built in noiseabatementmeasuresto restrict
noiselevel< 85 dB (A) where measured1 m away from the source.
.i. For equipmentwhere this cannotb'eachieved,the noisegeneratipgequipmentwill be
housedin suitableacousticcoverand buildingso that the noiseleveloutsidethe
b u i l d i n gw i l l b e 7 5 d B ( A ) .
* The resultantnoiselevelwithinthe proposedLPGPlantwill remainswithin 75 dB (A)
d u r i n gd a yt i m e a n d 7 0 d B ( A )d u r i n gn i g h tt i m e r e s p e c t i v e l y .
SOLIDWASTEMANAGEMENT
.:' No solidWasteshallbe generatedfrom operationof proposedMoundedBullets.Used
oil, greaseand empty drums shallbe disposedoffthrough registeredvendorsas per
H a n d l i n go f W a s t eM a t e r i a la n dT r a n s b o u n d a rRyu l e s2, 0 0 8a n d s u b s e q u e n t
amendments.
.i. All biodegradable
waste(food and kitchenwaste)at the proposedLPGPlantwill be
collectedand disposedoff as per well established
practice.
GreeneryDevelopment
* G r e e n e r yw i l l b e d e v e l o p e da r o u n d t h et e r m i n a li n t h e v a c a n tl a n ds p a c et o c h e c kt h e
fugitivedust emission.
* The fire protectionand detectionsystemare in accordance with OISD1,44/1,50.
* The fire water pumpsare activatedautomatically. When the fire-waterheader
pressureis low, the jockeypump maintainsthe pressureautomatically. Thefoam is
suckedthroughVenturisystem
* All routineexercises shallbe carriedout on the basisof standardSOPas a part of
preventivemeasuresto eliminateleakageand accidents.Preventivemaintenance of
e q u i p m e n st h a l lb e c a r r i e do u t a s p e r O I S Dg u i d e l i n e s .
* Thefollowingsafetymeasuresare alsoconceivedto combatwith emergencyscenario
that may arisewithin the proposedLPGPlant due to accidentalreleaseof petroleum
prociucts through leakages/spillages:
,/ All or inlet-outlet volvesof the MSV will be provided with fire sofe remote operoted
volves.
'/ High LevelAlarm
'/ Vapour ExtroctionSystem.
,/ Autonruted Fire Detectionond Alarm System
./ Automoted Fire ProtectionSystem(Hydront& SprinklerSystem)
- ,/ Fire Ext:nguishers
€
r' Automoted Hydrocarbon Detectors
'/ EmergencyShutdown (ESD)System
,/ Fire Woter storage tonk
The followingis the summary of the public hearing proceedings,reflectingthe views

and relatingto environmentalissue as well as some of their demands,expressedby
the assembledpublic at the venue. lt was recorded by the officialsof the Regional
Officeof State PollutionControlBoard,Odisha,Bhubaneswar.
1. S r i J o gi n a th B a h u b a l e n d ra, Kaipadar , Village, Khor dha: Sr i Bahubal endr a
Welcome the officials sitting on the dais and the public. He welcomed the project
proposalof the installationof the BottlingPlant. He told that thoughthis land belongsto
Shree JagannathTemple, people of Deulatangiand Somanathpurvillagewere depend
on the land for their livelihood.He pointed out about the environmentalissues and
requestedto prot€ctthe environment,controlpollutionand saving people'sinterest.He
also requestedto engage unemployedyouth in the plantfrom Somanathpur,Deulatangi
and Kaipadar.He suggested that developmentof above villages and other nearby
villages should be taken up along with CSR activitiesof the company with due
consultationwith local Sarpanch and elected representativesand public. He further
appealedthe industryto take care of the affectedpeople,the plantationsand green belt
development.The number of trees shall be chopped off due to project should be
compensatedby makingmore numberof plantations.
2. Sri Ajit Kumar Pattnaik, Deulatangi:Sri Pattnaikexpressedthat the presentsite

on which the project is going to be establishedbelongs to Shree JagannathTemple
Administration.
He furtherstatedas follows.The TempleAdministrationOfficialsshould
have been here. He requestedTemple Administrationofficialsto follow appropriate
procedureto sale or transfer the land to any project to be establishedwith due
consultationwith the people dependenton the land. There was a house called Baruni
ChetanaKendraon projectsite which was demolishedand trees were felleddown. He
urgedupon to constitutea team involvingof localpeopleto visit existingplantconsisting
of above facilitiesso that they will be convinced about the environmentpollution
mitigationmeasures. He apprehendedthat there may be gas leakageor fire hazards
which may affect nearbyvillagesin and around 03 to 04 Kilometerarea at the project
s ite . T h e r e s ha l l b e g ro u n d w a te r depletionin Kur adhm al,Deulatangiand Kaipadar
villagesdue to ground water extractionby the projectactivitiesand wanted to know
l e a su re s.D u e to p ro j e cta ctivities
re m e d i am ther eshallbe waterpollutionand wante dto
\
fr
know ah,outwater pollutioncontrol measures.The details of control and mitiga
measureson water pollution,air pollutionand noise pollutionin prpject report should be
given to then in written commitmentso that they shall be convinced.He demanded
development of the nearby villagers and of unemployed youth of the
"tiloyt"nt
locality.He requestedTemple Administrationofficialsto rectify the revenue records of
the project sites or nearby as Mango Tree garden not grassland. The villagjersat
Kuradhamal,Deulatangiand Nuasahi should be taken into confidenceand with due
consultationwith them project and developmentalactivitiesshould be taken up. The
festivalactivitiesof "Mundia Gusain" of nearby area should be taken care of by project
authorities.He handed over a written representationto Additional District Magistratein
the meeting.The project may come up and operate in conformitywith pollutioncontrol
norms. Sri pattnaikdemandedthat a map shouldbe provided to them and properly
developed road shbuld be provided in the area for access of all villagers to their
livelihoodarea. He thankedfor conductingpublichearingmeetingin the projectsite.
3. Sri lswar Chandra Mangaraj, Kaipadar Village:- Sri Mangarai welcome all
present in the public hearing meeting here. He urged that Temple Administration
officialsshould have been here. He further expressedas follows. He wanted to know
the compensationto be given by M/s. lndian Oil CorporationLtd. for those were
dependenton Mango trees for their livelihood.They wanted written commitmenton
controland mitigationmeasureson environmentpollutiondue to projectestablishment,
which should be stricflyfollowed.He demandedto engage local peoplefrom Kaipadar
and Kuradhmalpanchayatin the projectwork and all developmentwork shouldbe done
in these panchayats.He welcomethe projectwork and they want writtencommitment
on complianceof pollutioncontrolnorms.He wanted road developmentof area around
project area.He wanted to know about disposalof waste generatedfrom the plant-The
depletionof groundwater of nearbyarea shall be remediated,if groundwater extraction
shallbe done due to project.The hospitalproposedat Kaipadarshallbe developed-The
help shall be extendedto KuradhamalVillagedeity for cievelopmentof the deity-
4. welcom eal l
Sr i B i b h u P ra sa d B a l i a rsi n gh,KaipadarVillage:- Sr i Baliar singh
present in the meeting. He told that he welcome project establishment.He further
expressedas follows.Appropriatedue attentionshould be given toward environment
be compensatedby afforestation.
protection.The numbersof treeschoppedof shor-rld
\
/n /ieu of an existrng garden area of two acres they sha// be given two acre in nearby
area. The unemployedyouth shall be employed in the project and most affected
v i l l a g e r sd ema n d so f S o ma n a th purKaipadar
, and Kur adham alvillagesshallbe ful fi l l ed.
Kaipadarvillagesare affected by ground wat6r depletionwhich shall be resolved.A
committeeinvolvinglocal people shouldconstitutedand visit other exitingplant to learn
and implementbest environmentalprotectionpractices.All demandsshall be fulfilledby
projectauthorities.
5. Sri Prasana Kumar Samantaray, Kuradhamal:- Sri Samantraywelcome all and
told that the project site was a better fodder land for nearby villages of Kuradhamal,
Kaipadar,Somanathpurand Deulatangiwhich is now lost due to projectto be established.
He further expressedas follows. He agreed to the points raised by prdvious speaker Sri
Ajit Pattnaik. He requestedProjectAuthorityto take care of environmentpollutionand
take preventivemeasures to any gas leakage. Because,the nearby villages shall be
affectedmost and these must be attendedto. The TempleAdministration
shouldgive due
attentionfor protectionof their village road and cremationground.The demand shall be
fulfilledby M/s. IOCL Authority.The unemployedyouth of area shall be engaged.The
developmentworks of their nearby villagesof two panchayatshould be taken up so that
they shall forgethardship.The local vehiclesmay be engagedfor transportationactivities
of the project.
6. Smt. RajshreeChampatiray,Sarpanch, Kaipadar :- Smt. Champatirayexpressed

that specificattentionshall be given towards environmentalpollutioncontrol,and non
release of toxic gas. She demanded engagementfor poor and eligible candidate in
project. She also demanded for Panchayat development works such as road
communication,drinkingwater supply, lightingfacility,education,helping SHGs, health
training of intelligentyouth,transportation
of goods by localyouth.She wanted protection
of peopleof the Panchayatfrom environmentdegradation,if any.
7. SatyabadiSwain, Deulatangi : Sri Swainexpressedthat the projectof M/s. IOCL
shall be establishedand all inhabitantsof two Grama Panchayatswelcome project
establishment.He furtherexpressedas follows.The people have certainobjectionsand
complaintswhich should be redressed.The unemployedyouth of two panchayatsmay
b e e n g a g e d/ b e n e fi te dA. h o sp i tafa
l cilityin Kaipadarshallbe taken up or develop ed.
A
road may be providedto villagersto accesstheiragricultural
fieldsnear projectsite.
4a
8- sri rapan Kumar Patra,Kaipadar:sri patrawelcomedall and repeated what earlier
speakershavetold. He also addedthat the plantauthoritywill engage local people and
takecareof the peopleof KaipadarGrampanchayat.
9. Sri Achyutananda Pradhan, Deulatangi:--Sri Pradhan expressed that they are
happy that public hearing is being conducted. He expressed further as follows. The
announcernent in publicaddresssystem was done about publichearing.There was huge
graAng field on project site, which was used as grazing field for catfle of nearby five
villagers' There was a "Baruni Chetana Kendra" developedby HorticultureDepartment
and plantationsof Teak, Cashew, Mango and Jackfruit etc. These trees produced fruits
used to be served at Somanathpurvillagedeities.The projectauthoritiesshould give a
written commitment for benefit of all villagers of two Panchayats. He requested that
affectedpeopleshould be given priorityon alt benefitsto them. The approach road to their
deityshallbe developpd.The road wideningand adequateplantationon both side of road
shallbe taken up. The healthfacilityand educationfacilityshouldbe taken up.
After the deliberationswere made by the public, the summary of the views and
concernsof the publicwith minutesof the public hearingmeetingwere read out in Odia
languageby the RegionalOfficerof StatePollutionControlBoard,Bhubaneswar.
Then, he
invitedthe Representative
of the industryto offertheirviewson issuesraisedby the public.
Shri B.K. Pathy,Chief Manager(LPG- Engg)on behalfof M/s. IndianOil CorporationLtd.
has placed his views on the issues raisedby the Public.The summary of the views and
concernsof the publicand the commitmentsmade by the ProjectProponentare annexed
in Odia language& Englishlanguageas Annexure-lll & lV, respectively.Three Numbers
of representationshave been received during the public hearing meeting which arc
annexedherewithas Annexure-V.
At the closingof the meetingAdditionalDistrictMagistrate,Bhubaneswarthanked
the public for their patient hearing and their participationin the deliberationsand for
concludingthe meetingin a peacefulmanner.The video recordingof the entireproceeding
of the meetingis placedherewith.
Finallythe meeting ended with a vote of ihanks to ihe chair and all participants
presentin the meeting.
f-r
44. ^&
I
(Dr.Binod
;",ffit+Jrs (Sri Mana"JRan-janSamal)
RegionalOfficer, AdditionalDistrictMagistrate,
St a t eP o l l uti o nC o n tro B
l o a rd ,Od i sha, Bhubaneswar
R e g i o n aOffi
l ce ,B h u b a n e sw a r
A l " l ' v - r? x < L o o - _ f
ATTENDANCESHEET
A T T E N D A N C ES H E E T OF T HE PERSONSPRESENTIN
THE PUBLIC HE AR IN G
M E E T IN GF OR T H E P R OJE CTOF M/S.INDIANOIL CORPORATION
LIM ITEDF OR
P R O P OS E D C ON S T R U C T IONOF LPG BULK STORAGE
( 1800 M T ) AN D
B.OTTLINGFACILITY(INDANEBOTTLTNGPLANT)AT
SOMANATHPURVTLLAGE
I N K H OR D H AD IS T R IC TH E L D ON DTD.2O.O7.2018
AT 11.00AT PROPOSEDLPG
PLANT PROJECTSITE OVER PLOT NO.7O7& 708
OF VILLAGE SOMANATHPUR
UNDER KATPADARGRAMA PANCHAYATOF KHORDHA
TAHSIL IN KHORDHA
D I S T R IC T
Ve n u e :P ro j e ctS i te a t vi l l a g e som anathpurunder

KaipadarGr am a pancha y atof
KhordhaTahsil in Khordha District.'
D a t e& T i me : Z o ]o l .zo ,t8

a t 1 1 .00A.M .
Name & Address of partiCipants

Signatur e
I tL . $ -.;g{-a(^.atlz---
45t
9e-<xt^+a*fi
"'t.opa.- 4to*-1q,
.',.-e S z|
g-jz--pQ^'
WqS^/{a.- 6-ry/F/a/',g-L
wa"Bryry.
So" Sqgc.\ tr-\,\"'acrf (a1;Oef
Orf firrCA
!al.!cqo
-$"^t . t*-9^,
_2:uL^-fan/-Z
Name & Address of Participants Signatur e
No.
1o
li ArW>h tuLqi-W41 gi3st4 /t'jsr"+ 11

u<z>blanl t-i
hsnoarcxf\ Wfpadtt T\,ter;h)
V
'
t,(.r' \nthaf,crlq., (.1.*a\ K.r, mthcfi#-or,
r3 kcrrrdl
)e*JeLlonga'
7t/r/;2a"-"4---P'{a - 7c72fr*-,<oF -
t+ aznA"/
I
rf IW*eru J;Y \t )
/"
IL
\*111
.42
tv- ryfu-^
lv qwct
p.rccsan -r,.+-," kl^r'r S"-"-)nt
\1 t / f
k+;^4>'""-'-dj
,j*b-e 4 J./k -
Wt'' Jo/A'r
h "lrrr//or
ir / po - hoz;ttazJno
I^{"rn.- r\l+* vo-\"'*;'lf Lgo; lg+i B"A-'Z"$,
+ ) l r 6- K f f ^ t T - -
a q
- l
")j
/
9u
: l
-)
Name & Address of ParticiPants- Sagnatur e
sl.
tlo.
f 2t f'aloS It fhoh@Pefltu, g avff otA dho 1,,^_a.

pq*e
fuoi Po+da,
r
A6 Jr2aaol* ///u./u/r J-aortu s*/"ii
K*or.d/Prefu'-
4-/;tz*q; aaa=j! ,z&,- dhi Ll'rc/t .24=_, c.z-'4g *4J
L+
futrc a- J lra-'rz> 6."1/a4
9"4a 412'v^Z
2e 9ut-r7,f1ffi-l::,dT ]Ot*nl"'
Jo#, 'QDtiVrcsintrl) to$t Dai) f.s ihy,

u ltu vft.zdh(,nqli
4fl atet t|sqd aa6u,r
*2*,
]o
€4+a etflt
el
QAQ a{'r+f -gal@
4w>m921
wr.-(zErK ffil {rtT ffit: Wnl
e? bffinzn
fraut'naW /*W
73 $g*na ln-u-1(%,.
UuA PcdL-ay
fiiftaflfa /{$a/,/fuq
911 frih.rtq fr^hlrf-ry
Kcift/urL-
9Y ,Llonau) (urn*
f-l anoYh eAanclnet Sca-hGo
-/<''7a N*"il ch"at/na <aAoo
3L e/erL
}T
'Ffe*u f?*4-"'Z^ '6'g*u/+
/;f"a-e-t*-
iq.lG'n eQe{.rc^Jt_-[.,ct1ct{- \a411oYa'4*
)g Sagqnfe- 9
l' al PuJo^n-
S a"nlo/40 h4trare
?1
ton
5t. Name & Address of Participants Signature
No.
Ir n //rtr'
,{rk
+l Ol9.a66a" per\ %udq, bqry,,k.
KqiFAqn
+L aa.+-Zn b*'.r-\
u ^-r-p^J n ")
+) *q€Jq- qqt e,,.""rg^ 4"4W4q"
4+ 4,t"Trc,qs-l@tQ NIctYd<
"/"-
5eu-ua=+..n+i
4t flnflat4
€alr616
de6 Q
qg,5) 4 a.,?3
v4fr61
+x 9Q/r"/-str, P4rd-
qFHar o6tr q:\aq-6ffit
+a oeq$er+a_
+& 9nQtFqrag: +^t7cffiz
"1,*, a}ntttq.}g
$€lA Ahn-{F SFsilrs#aDL
41
ffiffi+ Aq,qffi*
6?HhrEqft
x--25-r*7MH
_ri qel"**T"?%F$1^rg_
_12
s3
94-
Dt. me & Address of Participgnts Signature
No.
.>)
ry p"Deu,
6dPt €( 4
4i*l*
,
|
\+q'c
\r n . / ^ )n
)
tL 9e-onaooifr A+w
$EA
9T Derl"az
wloado"z-
Jâo.
D*4& p*o)da-
9K
k*i7odo>
s1 e^-*t1 U.u" %,o+t.--4.^'t e; *..*9'=+4*^
@l,*lt onu^,!tu'* (lj,'-{- '-4
Lo
Wqte"d "-
&Ltaao'u"Q'*e-y
bl Itrr^Mwh"r^ Ylvw^kL"
VU";W \a/n^l"i)-^-
LL SureUra. C/za.r"F^!, f. zJ4,
K A--t pafh4/
6 3 L\,.ITqt heb De^t}^ t-ttd l-D.tq

O Ltu. Tq-wOf
6 Y c,ol;Fî aq,q.1qf efltP(*lq&.
.\ __... Gsrrqq-RES\R_
\\
s\a\r>t+\ @aq+e\ ''o E\o-\nYiLVA
(:f
66 *
trJ€4q/ep 6q5)^d) 4efltrq&
a.
6:r 3.-a *&L<s-t'tl,*- ba.t) l\
tu' \a*zr{o-
( j
Tp,r)u\
Su rr**'th Pu:{
t-' >t
{, ol
U . Name tr Actctressof participants
N( l /
Signature
7o RA4* t {u @hor@
( (P to\AqD ) "
l'luJr'Ci\drq71 <u^r^@
7r G\'{
f'uL-R--c-'E-N{
7 z l*1J1* Ud o^n-lo^.
Wa-zbrf.)a/y n
&t-l.-cr,^,* r\"4
73 fr*.s
qq.lp<Dzry %p"x-
77
4p^4D*U
7{
Sc..'-s?l- fitt*"*t/
7b
yPyt?nAz9@qow; khrr{wp,Fp
-r7
H**tridq +nikoel @i\,{ 9 \i+$
7s
Qrla.ll.-rr*e- d* n Pn_-j',r-y{ y,- .P&n\ v-N-o&
7 < a
-/1
frrKhw?np9*L,+^'fi ttlr-,:Pgll.n'y'{a?8r4-- it
ro n A .. .l
*S,..^t ur^Ver-"'.*â--, f.9'ft*dt
yt
K*n4*\urs{ I6rfr.K,
rL !, /-'f tuUW;* ?t^*
rjl
_ l N
rq I
I
I
i
rYamec Aqoress ot Particlpants Signatur e
N,
#J,nfiq qrt>
v' cfi8262
* eafr60
l--_
g-
bat lzuffia \'<ln*tz-ryz

97 L/
lA t Pada-{L
ET '2"n P-'14-
n".r!:,0-!u.1"t>-
e1 {*"1
' t',ii {a..-4u-
,$\Lrrrelltfu o@a*^ffin"
fo O-/*-lPfl/a trt--{ ^-fi ezo
\--"' '
//,rol^dl rt,-ne n-//r> UlA*L,,*'
g l (gltrtont* f-)c^nrt1
C6ooniotro+t^ Qu-R RclJiy,|J--r3{,r\-LtA
6/9qqT *tf'^DAryVry
4t
9z
qY
9r- ) ; . \ / )
FCrrf0derr-
i
E+F- &soA^
qt .-ce^|,hry
a#'PNyn''
(+-&"*lizvn wwvlp,llaa
1+ ("'++*îA
^T KuvflcLn
7s
- 4-' Sdiizve\9a
II
11 8 *--*-,-h //a*7zt' /'t, I
I
I
I
_ _'--l
Sl. ltame & Addressof Participants tignature
I I
N o . i - i
Wy\tv'sl2 v
I 6,6qS.
tat i 4ta7n.y
tlryGorEs)
?fl,#"" 4ffi,\
BaNootn' fta'/-hqn
B),xrot, fu"'A+*' oe-e.,lee @->4-seo*9
i 3-du<"-*.-Jt-;1as.7c"t1
/"Yl .-Selrs.\b"r.*i
t'rl q*1 q'qtq

-'! Sqr.>
f_r st'\
Su\Abrnr Bas,\<si Ss5=\^'dsr:-
se$"a!,.rst
t(4/€' -e'ww
.a%.rr -
i 1,77-q7(2
aI1 EA6 V6 44Y16b'zL
?- /'
6 "11fra-€F-6>,J>/
.9q14^#lE't?z 6q*ti -5q1aufl*z,4ea

ggtafi q, oiq eqoySbt gqlga- afl a 17
€c qar46
It t -FW;-__ i
F -
tHV Y ' I AV inr'n-'c4vu"'l h-f\

-F ^t''na v''
I
,'u'l
ll
ryqh,pl-L.pLq.-
Name & Address of Participants Signatur e
Rorfitccl, ' b qt U i Ralr trUh haJHt
pg,.ze-f ;f P4Z/da_
'a-dAozzej/=
'rnl"alllla
/ Chuo
t<,ai(a/aY ?raL,il/lq/Chl"off
/L/ dd--.f /z-a{-.>2 c/-v7 9"/b-4v
K-Lvu?-a/
d /4 dh*"( rz-.: 3r*+t-<--
*aqrh A:""*-r*4oaq
SAt*i
T t
f*rr:
^'*YAD# dt*t.dt"U
frb;^4 froa4g"rg4 fib; ^rg Da4-eg. ifL4?
gr.r*.*nnffi'ut-
Qrqq 9 =.,r?
t24 I Kn*X,*b P"'e,eJ/ao
t
Sr.**/'f, ,rra/A
I
f*rf* 62"ftrM I
' c'?'TuA@v?
JI ress of Participants Signature
Nc
lgo &s'^{Ytuth
f-&,^"1I a*+-"',6)
l)t
IYIaa ou'atfa, o B on*/ x ry dafo-
lsz (-'+4s4,*V-\s:aJ * l
""%,
ie9 fetru"ttt alrnit \qy
le"l ^ 4 /
14..{tuJo/t4
. n
o ,!qa
g*,rl*t
>qjV$ **?f.v p_
l9{
n4eAl<"'Pr*,fA(
ltt c.Y'J.T3:y#
t9v tiy7+,'9^
A\A^6$!^,i^
{)
-F/^5tr
',t
6qLL
c
irr <r-
J&+'l4eSl^'e"tW
,,{--'-
t/'N 1f q
)
^/{
try 8fl..# a*$;"fi r*,..a{t..otito
lyo f4 p,-*tlbq n^ryr,$-nnlla
lyt
pso laS}'fr 4 l' ^n k uz oJârt.ol
R tr FrAx'a:
tyz
n**nffi
lY3
_l
- -\-
q
t
A vrr>e*-,./Ye-If
ATTENDANICESHEET
(Signaturesof p'ersonswho deliberatedin the PH)
IN THE PU BLIC
A T T E N D A N C ES H E E T OF THE PERSONS DELIBERATED
OIL CORPORATION
HEARINGMEETING FOR THE PROJECT OF M/S. INDIAN
(1800 MT)
LIMITEDFOR PROPOSEDCONSTRUCTIONOF LPG BULK STORAGE
SOMANATHPUR
AND BOTTLING FACILITY (INDANE BOTTLING PLANT) AT
VILLAGE IN KHORDHA DISTRICTHELD ON DTD.2O.O7.2O18 AT 11'OOA'M' AT
OF VILLAGE
PROPOSEDLPG PLANT PROJECTSITE OVER PLOT NO.7O7& 708
OF KHORDHA
SOMANATHPUR UNDER KAIPADAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT
T AH S I LIN K H OR D H AD IS T R ICT.
Panchayatof
venue: Project site at village somanathpur under Kaipadar Grama
Khordha Tahsil in Khordha District'
Date & Time: 20.07.2018at 11.00A'M'
ttame & Address of ParticiPants Signature
ts G,hnb
qir^'aT[^
To\-, c.\artY +I"f'-Jh b "I.rJ"
tz-o-;b{J a-r
- Af*r \r'>'ett:
tiov -€I ,
f<il\"oS*
p-"r-*-.la^..c
?".-"4"**t<v r)
t.
y. \*r'ffi
e at Address of Participants
Fs\\1yl*^-'\\?
A ,--,-.e /-tJ -u-*-.-i I f \
Glt6lo1o,
edn Fetafifieaaerqgtoo( er o o 6q6q6,nlsnoa o".
Q6-fi"6'16)6116)t "6"
cfiQt 0t6i'ot 9olo9/9oqt- efi 6nOot ee eO6{eFlCI.6a
6fit6il
6qerGraoooqrfi ogrqoa6qrfl6laq0 qrfl60gsroo{ft06 g6's0 qo
A"_
9 o9 (a'fl) {Q" 9 or 66r c'6ll6Jdll6
aq€o cataEntI {o G,616I616t16o
G\FQhjt6ldteer
gQ {Q" q6'g au6,to1q"0
Q66.a.rt
c'6l6J61161166l
G,6'qlul6t6" qral q6'BaU6,ta16b
q6Qqr
a0gt06' Oaf.Otae{flgg 6J66'
6"q60qoo 6'0t6tnl
06606t-qqs6l,
{6' {aahqa6l {6-
g6t9tQ
0o6E0 I
( 6') 6o60qao6'a6t/6t6o
{c'\fi186 aah;
00680 | q6o,6a sdtstQG,R{e. c,t6fi6er{o0t6l
aelata66o6JG'fi'{e. otqa qqs6t 6ao

aQ-tqgrOaaroelntqontqeotovreqfiar
E@q8o aorei(erraq{o. 66lt6caCI6l
o6lnaroe;a)q- q"qa aatsta
flat61Eot
serqQat6,6161
sq.G.O 6alaotateaoal
Oo t aror6Forfiosra6ooaqifio aQot
Cw)-deieel
ooras
{-n666r,lq (fi) aqtoLlnot
eFo
€ {etQ q6qn.'gete, 60.ad {e. 60,edafior ota 6q oqogt/Rta
aofian
qdan0o6E0 I aerrCIo
t
. sn06 ovtqa6Eiaaao,6aqoatata
qs,'6!fiGqa6'aea oqoglaQot
___]
"-+ s*).
zaPjts'
/
. snCG 6Hq Oal e'6eei ga

qocioQeroqogstQo
ota"ae'eer I
;u;,"'
. <nioG6lqlqE0| 01fr6l0lal6lEal$ao
eafio GEO0i 66'et0t10gleiOot
qtc:u
. {at eQo aQ 6e;t0o em- qq"Gfio

aQqa6qalaCIfte640 |
ots.aaqa aqogletQo
o aqqs 0q0gl6er
evv qsdocalaEc
orot6B.ata.{q.6 I
(fi) qcq e g06,fie'er
ggt6o
Eal qlel Gnoo6'to600atqt665'nlA6'0160
G'60tqlol o61l01{i60
qaoQglo0 a06j'1466 6Oq"
q6oen GpG'G'ffqlq {Q" qet6o G'rafiral66l
qnqOc'eafr''6ffl6ll6l
I o"on0a Eq eoo at6"I SUcqatePiodt
cfi'q-afl6' oqagtaQ qan an aeiq qG
aarCIo
t
(a)-odooe60idrlc'q-qselt (cl ooqeqo*eo0eon6q;
6QQ6101
ass a0QG6tq6q saQ aqql60 Fritet
gq8d eOO
I 60616lO
oerratnCI atQ"t
b'btl.UlbtU I Ot'Olblbr' g\r;\)ol Dr{!' n'rlr ,
I
{G'otain
{e).aq-aq c'6-o{GrdA6t'4raerGdoql
t GI aqroblnor
s6 atanR i
60,a6ta6ot am" Fq 0q0glaonani

aorOo
t
. snOGglqlqa6qio q4CI60qoal ota"
qq"Gfioqod oQeraqoglerQo
t
. <n06 6lqtqaot ciG66)ga aFJCIcG
'
$'ta\,'t<,
-tf),'4'
o -{fi06 0qtq EQt atfi6} 0tat6lEatOtaCI
qtfl q8tfio aqQ fl 6,ft0 Qqagt00a I
o {at qQo aq ndtoa ota*qg."Gfio

aQOa6qotaons 6a0 I
aQOa0qogr6asrd CItaoa0q0gtaQo
ora'r6 exy qadosateEo
s.ata.{q.6 I
(e')aga0R0.0 (o) qgtOooc,qarelenQtao qa6,ta6"
aq6so'ofreoomr
qastota-eoen otat60t06tI ofieoetg G,6rR
G'tolg flatfi,g,aQrrQgt
aQalql
6ncn%
otq auc agft otal6Q10616,6ll0lQ
qqfic06toarOo
I
Fqd qfl.o'la, 66tq1oo qrfl6e. arqaaao Fqserqoa o6rt6fnt
I
olqlq.(Q'qt8g aeo6.'a6l
I
(G) aqrqato66eergtels E06' (G) 6060 qa qaQ qfl0.6Q
91fi0,
arnq6g6q60t6t
I 6RrCflrRq6eq16o afiotsoraqt{6'ta
OarCIo
t
(ttl ortfioeiiqiFta (61) aqql60e grnna@-se
60,Ft
aerrari6o6166tet6oqrarGaor0qer
qo6taatCIot
G,rdvgct
(ett brqbdiqta6nqE 6Qt05tg (et)aetan6o,aaqqt66e gtan 6'qasfi
aoqtaOoroaaqO t o6la6laeatql 6otqlooqrsrGaorflqa
atqotaad
a"66)160 ardlqaqadaerr0ot
k**+f
Zo./aJt
i
z
l ' t
T-
(G) Olqaal ql9tq6)6'60l6ll6i

I (a) Fcinqt6crprg gt6{q 6E0Ee
aiiiqqa
6ngl6creifiGotst6a otGqee'iet
qafl eertcot
(g' a86'66l qfgq, 6g9t g glo10.6'q0aq'cal
qput t
afi60r6ri6io qtFltao
66,a66re16o otaq 6otoeQiooI
(o) qtesaqOoewso" 6fitqG6\
qta6ooroq6rilo i 6ea66tetenqlat6aot0q6q;teaelCoI
(s') {0 48ft66l QQ16'616]
6'l (6') qqG'lcad 6 66ltql60
6q9l
4"60c6ist Fetaer
or0qotdvFqitqe
6Ras0 ateiq
s gwq ae[oseoettntT
anr6ot
+1.'-
effiui##.*
a,ad6*a a.
A u- r)e-r,L-, n-<- f '.t
ISSUES RAISED AND RESPONSEOF THE PROJECT PROPONENT
IN THE
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING FOR THE PROJECT OF M/S. INDIAN
OIL
CORPORATIONLIMITED FOR PROPOSEPCONSTRUCTIONOF LPG
BULK
STORAGE(1800MT) AND BOTTLINGFAciLtry (INDANEBorrLtNG pLANT)
AT
SOMANATHPUR VILLAGElN KHORDHADlSTRtir HElo oN DTD.20.o7.zo18
AT
11.00AM HELD AT PROPOSEDLPG PLANT PROJECTSITE OVER
PLOT NO.
707(PI & 708 OF VILLAGE SOMANATHPURUNDER KAIPADAR
GRAMA
PANCHAYAT OF KHORDHATAHSILIN KHORDHADISTR|CT.
lssuesraisedby the public in ttre Responseof the Project eroponent
P u b l i cH e a ri n g .
The issuesraised in the public hearing meting Our parawiseResponse
is as below:
wereasfollows:
1. lssuesconcerningEnv. pollution and its (i) Sincethere is no water or fuel
usedin the processof
controland mitigationmeasures. unloading/storageand bottlingof LpG,hencethere is
i) Waterpollutionand its controlMeasures. no air and water pollution.All
biodegradable waste
(foodand kitchenwaste)at the proposedLpGplantwill
be collectedand disposedoff after beingtreatedin STp.
ii) Accidentalrelease of LpG Gas and its (ii)Auto LPGdetectionand
Alarmsystemalongwith
adverse impact and its control & HighLevelAlarm,ROV,automated
fire fighting
mitigationmeasures. equipments havinghydrantandsprinkler systemin line
with OISD 144 areproposedto be provided.
iii) Groundwater depletionin surrounding (iii) Maximumwater requirement
for the plantshallbe
villagedue to extractionat Groundwater approximatelyIZm3/ day,
which is a small quantity
by project proponent and Alternative compared to the larger area
being covered by the
WaterSupplyto affectedvillages. proposedplant. Hencethere will be no depletion of
ground water. Additionallywe shall also be putting up
rain water harvestingfacilitieswhich shallrechargethe
groundwater level.
iv) Noise pollution due to transportation (iv) Noise level of
all the equipmentsare designedto
activities. containthe noiselevelwithin 75 dB (A); thus there is no
Noisepollution.
v) Firehazardsand its RiskAssessment. (v)Auto LPGdetectionandAlarmsystemalongwith
HighLevelAlarm,ROV,automatedfire fighting
equipments havinghydrantandsprinklersystemin line
with OfSD744 areproposedto be provided.
v i ) G r e e n b e l t d e v e l o p m e n ta n d p l a n t a t i o n s (vi) Necessary
plantationand greenerydevelopment
of Native species for protection of coveringmore
than 33%of the area occupiedshall be
envtronment. taken up in the proposedproject area in line with
provisionsof MoEF& CC,Govt.of lndia.
+q*,'oft/,
r'-''
D ea{*e-r),oso
cuu56-qiny
lssues concerning emploYment, CSR Our Response is as below:
Activitiesand peripheral
development
(i) Employment opportunityfor localYouth (i) Priorityto localpeopleshallbe givento the extent
on priority basis. possibleduringconstructionstage.
(ii) Development
of NearbyVillages (ii) CSRactivitiesshallbe takenup as per Corporation
policyand in consultation with the localauthorities.
(iii) Plantation of Trees,Horticulture (iii)Greeninitiaiivesas a part of CSRactivitiesshallbe
DevelopmentNearbyvillages. takenup as per CorporationPblicyand in consultation
with Localauthorities.
(iv) Watersupplyto nearbyvillages. (iv)CSRactivitiesshallbe takenup as per Corporation
policyand in consultation with the localauthorities.
(v) Health, Education and drinking water (v) CSRactivitiesshallbe takenup as per Corporation
supplyfacilitiesin the area. policyand in consultation with the localauthorities.
(vi) Peripheral developmentand CSR (vi) CSRactivitiesshallbe takenup as per Corporation
Activities. policyand in consultation with the localauthorities.
(vii)Afforestation programmein the area. (vii)Greeninitiativesas a part of CSRactivitiesshallbe
takenup as per CorporationPolicyand in consultation
with Localauthorities.
ll
r \ez
u)
\ n- /l--'n
.
9ls?19,
t P
l/ L/-r. \?
A ,-,Y>.a-z(
q1qtl a66o 6qoln 6$t6).,1t
oat e'6,6.J61r6
aqolerr,
6sir6rdll
6q, 6$tautI
GqrnstaqoerTlarQo6\6tqta
fiq'tgqc6se.,qCI1G
gOn6qfrq 6ar6Q
atrYd66
969 a,stc6'l I
FtQtclg,
aicitl q]flol q"allQidli 016l,qt-FovtRc) ot6t,qilGCIt -o6fioq6, eti,'6-egtrdr
a06jq_6-6ltaa6 6, 9 c o (, fiQc'i06]q166reJa flOQg6lqa qalc"orqql 06qH fiargq6-6r
s a l f i e t a q e e e i l t ' ' r Q o?$"t -o6t n o E / ee , q 6 e . _ 9 o g ( u f ) o . 9
{ 9o 6, qro"_r*o,
(uf), {o-qsoa.,qs G'-9ocn
(ar) { o.eooo.ao6o{o agrCIr
qe,q,grflrfi
aqal
omi'rlondq"fre $qenomger s6 qeq Rr6arr46r
qaFfiq efilorQo gg
Q6err,,
(sretoteit)
t)o6o{o 6qlqQqo6c[dosrromi6 q0tg6]qon6
reoa?orer-or""qiu ao66)
xo al6iqtd.ll6l6l
olgrqtoCIa gdtao oooq Oaromd rnaqq6.nq qonaao66raoqla+i
qtaoetg6laaoooqala Qo6auttiqoernrnafi
6106ll , ooqg'"t,,i* qnCIrqq.R 6,1'6rl
aRrerdaqaq i
otfnroal6aar6orqomq6o q1o6qe q0qq6,ao qon6q
qi6fiQtoola6r,'6lt{68 {o 6fit?1q
6arfrq goraa6adq6a nroqcnarsrnor so afrq Rreei6ge,r
alQOQ6otoCIoetal q6,q-(srarao6CI6fra ee.rqeeo ;s16rrga frReeetrgr6lioiia
qdlqQoao-61 out'otaqrnlI clalqQc a6llolerai
ororqtatzl6aata6l6la'n* salarQe,
EI aaQq8Q.fiQratQot e.'6ot6qG'16",
{qorer"qq6]6oc eorerfro
rx6 qoer6necar6a
Eo 6''1fi
e"ctq-aoialQlotllG"qne o6aq rsotq o66crruadororn-anqe6lerQaorscrio-
r
606l<Qatgtotqatao QatE6 od,leO16,6tqtaflaqq6"e,frn6 erQ6, otatqfrr,.6er
06
9sG6a,'eneqaeorfronren xoqdq.aHFHqo qoreoEeeeqeooauner
ef,rareer
6l|sraGB| {alq x0 anln aFuataauga$n6orora-eoer
aa a6arq6
r xoroc
Q6)lolat xQ oq OsCI,ea
6npgerroc'olq
ararra6 qrnd6ig6lqecdqe,ouq fiqo
al6aodl6't66'l
netedletQ
ogoq-s criqeaaa frfrorO"
Oerg6qrfire
6,olCIio
nrO",
{qalodlqooQoiaaa aqGfiue'qa66 sQo6)6rgqqqoCIor6,r
q,e,ier
qoiaotl qrco6igdlQaQas66) 66,i
6t';11 eogiorioel sQ aaaqreqflrdrie
oerfi6r,)
al6*
aCIqo6'aqI
?Jt06r6i6t
6e1tir
It
o t
:û'jL ,QI i(ar i 3ffi-jA
Btr,''-qotqstfL (a.tttatdtc,rtet)
Ol:Qr'.ctg.g.:?i
qi 'Ootroc (.)16)
'<llt(iili-eg-e.61q",,
i i.i1in
YZ - v
, A v'l) {{)'Q^/'v-t'Q'
Y 1A:^/'v
*.'o'':;*
- ]
ffiB,f*q,aa,66rlrl I
r\ flQlfif},
2U
'- n- ^,,^^ - /1r\/-..tt/-.',4
to .drqelaqq6 r r ( d ql6616,lQ1 A16A Al06|q"
I n ' l q l ( a u ( u ( 6q
;'616,8l6afil6eC'fiqlaflalqqq"qc'16l6
l,olftauag 6oan cl6n g 6alflalaq6l
aaiora
urciaQaEt
6fltct6a q6lEtqa65-lh,krh,rtr
r -zrnrAA
{066 cDll/-'i
?Jla-a'la.l^lotc.l^ 6a-lc'lqo
GqlflQlaqaccr-latdfr
6 l o l a " q l o S / QqQc, A " 9 o 9 , g o 9 , 9 o r o l a l oa c ' o l{ Y 9 . o o o
(qootnfi {,c'a) otatq atolotrGlftEala qlflolqlal6aASal olqQq"
otofrlfiG,qG.'t6i6r aoqtou c6 atqaqt <Q sdar qaoGtGlc a c r c i
e c c o fiqat66)g06llEla6'ta6qa6'l q"QE6l6ortetqlol 6qlflFlaqa
ot6o6t1 6ooc,t66'qafl6a alflo 6alQ6qol66laqTatq6ql 6'6llo16l olQl
aqtoa G'olotaEfitI otal6 o1€iotf ut66'ldq8fiEfil i Gq46al Ql"QE6
Oorter 6qot6f6t6ttO6A 6q0 G't6il{O" GAg"Rqct6tqat6a aoo, qlflolql
qq-daa$t cacstieic"iqG+acaorsaOOeqG'loqssoloetaG q1q1
6qlfiata6oo6ea cqtflataqaFl6aq"e8'6tc6ol a6cft.l6oG'6llo61l 6'6
OtfiAq{e"6qotq_aqqc-Pn /€Za'-iiaqqaq6lnqAd Olq6q'6a6l€LCI6
Aqg qlA'66lq1Q66rlQ0qq
66eg1t6tAA1SIAAOI 6A*aO G'l6lqGG'6OG'
OO Otqtq"6C AOAlOq"Aldol 0lA"OqolO6oql C'6ed6ft FIUAlFl
qtflotqlflta6"a
Oeerru 6ot6iotat€rftqo6ala016alfl | {066, 6qol66
66q qfio.66lafitf ototeestq€ 6ataataa 6I6Tnl ofiq6 flla aq6ol6a
nr66 | o6fntaat6rtqtaatqflrctr06q ostfllelfloal-a6nqc fi6al {Q"
qate Aq fltelflcAqola qqla at6iaiq"olan160, AlRLlOa Afiqqfllqa
qrafierqA1sO"SQetl qfiG'laqqAq66Oflln6a qgfiolfi'AlOta-G'6el
aatqGlc"6G'6oG'G'tolqogtaacat0ot 6fiGGOQooocaCIFatfia I Qa
6AR|C6A Al06lq' 66'lloatee
CI6'6ilOIOOGOAt6Ft qtgatqlfltGa ?J6)6tO
a51ta6oa 6ecoa 6616,6068qal62 qqslqecg {0166laqqlql 6116
ne atqaq_{6'"AlAfiiAG"qeA qla={Q" qlhllnetOqOAIA OtA"aO q6q.
qra60 qfltqaq"6b{ aqagl Ftidfl6aaglaa Galota qa QlLjlfi$6}Al
I 6qlflalaqac"
aig a)ea qtfia q1 ei cqtflaia 6oqrfea 5oafi6'16r1
Pj.q.6{?
l/ell
6lq6 6aeo osroo aertCotqO q6cra c'arfi66r
ul6s ao6'p 6
6CI60qataflrac"oqgill aqaotecta*ata eaJetQatettntQ*{e" ai6
aaa qrfiorql
ardotqoraqso"ziigfirnq"aq$serroe
6a6ltea eaTarQ
{6'ororaq"qrao q6qa6ateraOFETterardqaloa ota-6aor6o EOI
acisel$tqore
Go/aoqtaqeeld 6L6cat6eaeac6lsr€ aqrfir6aenras"
orqoaso 6oqroaraateifafie'tqnt6e'G
I
{{I aG oafirs6oa qteiatG6I6,{ara qOotor
6'ororasqrfiR}aqo
eaTarQo arefiraqqAa qtei6a6o asroo qO aoq@oo6so
G,fiq"
6ar0eRar6aqrne:rqlfltctr
aocp 6aq I
6.q:- elo6tqQo6ero6ogtFIqtctorqla oo€rqaroetq.Fae'eer
oafirg
rGarCI$q'a6Rtqeo
ar6oafiqn'gore CI@eiQa6I eqQsdsqrnreaqa
eaTarQo ao qd arejqrfiaralflraq a6firoa6oaeqsaTdo.{66s6rs
6at ea-loQa"grqogr8aa 6'et0otgta-aqcotb; G'6IzlG'*
I
I l a 6t l
aieetq"G
OeJg
6OAn6't6P1 qtfl Otqledo
e 6a!fi G''iCIAA
{el6l <e6at 6'G'firl

qlq@ 6q1ein,66116lLJr
fllq@are.6.A.(eaqrsn alaq adatai)
qlq@ aiG'qflat,€@ott
FileLroe
6utaa, 6616lLl
FreqoaAfiqfial,€@otesetroertsd
asia6atfinit I
a9
ai: DicnR.# lcnF**,

' 6
) sal*f < e.s.Q**i i
9,ffc q'n'-.oirf, flFur

10
f*: =t"u* oti"F +qf'-','t e'{ clgcnr,
c; ol{< .'# qeltR\ ciA'",,.?r-AG clos'eQil:p
a._p: ZieG.l6 .i?qi{ .R qt5" c;fi^5+; s{)6riGj-
"il( ?e'l F
trJ#, 5;re,sir
j
?/4)
--L,F
i 6'e Fii? i'11 s
, ) <_.._
t4*T^ r<l- p"4J^4

S...ril<"r"n.)q- X"J*f1
^@<*+o Q.r..rt-
TG."\o,-AD
^*1 ;f,Cru_ ft.4q
. ('-.
\
\_
It'n r s\i11..1_1
\.
.rn"Xo.ral_ha,. \
4rd*@qyty'
=$c sqyc\.tr({r"r.t1 (!>\'
yur ?1
rytl
91 srTn-- .\
"tll
-,q'
S ^,\*\ -q1.^ |
do.eU$ ?
ns.*fn l.tlth.rror-
EIDIQ%nqo'-
\.t1t+.tUqrS ".fgqôitsu*raq.
Prbv fiV^rT4a\ os-14Do"4a;
?.nsfil"{"+
S, Sou"op-r14sqe (gqrrcvf
/
*S.r".lb.f \tl-qoe,( Ss-.brJ rrt

rn x a{- ,- . q ro-!L. rrt.-\ D,O oo J-ro
ed€9 @q!rc
fr'6'g,l eratq
'Y*\"qqY
Dq"T*,$, C.r#o^',n.,
"H€
qqgqh,
q
$trsr)e i
aBq grflr-
R,qeo'1S \,*{ +ns<.r'a-
,_-sqqtR.-: \-r.,fe,
4J ' qet-v-t
'*\ a-"4\bq r-
BQ\zt,
a - " =+F
- _
'
Yco G T
-"il*T)a-R* if,ff*
q?"\6 Q6o
o**;v$
dtaB',
.2_4
1+twqel L_ apZ_
?qw[s *q.
V, Frr* ?is?,r
.i.g*
R.fR lrr; ae.q
q6Ecl 'qQGc"Qa-98eoe9 -';l
e.6tjl: g-oee/ IND-II-P'H-749 O166
139.o9.9oR-i
{6qn} esgq. aes$ 6oee 5'omQarsrobQ'eo easd aQargas6 eerileao6'fr66€e€e€19

sereirGAIaeO'oeercieeqagtflc|6aqO e'9br sqe9o9 (P)64{q.0.0 eQ6Ql6aQ (ei-os,
6oG€6€Jse'e$6 e9egr (G6oqee6q qQe) 6+ito6ase soeeetq nqol ord'qdetlirae
qolalet- 99.o8.9oQr 6e 6cr ee.oooeQlqogce eereft e'eQoaeeieeoroe'talo
6nr,eereit
6to Oe esrQsrueaqset 0150seetqatrir6a6qnll og qorSe6eoeoa'l GGea!flFoQooi ::
Snulro of India"<e''u69t' 6Qol. go.ox.goe rdg6o Gerciegen QelolaEol
l Q eeeoc
aaerdrQlodedos ot. 99.o8-goQEj6eeo €gare4et qietuteo qetr6eg6e qglgtoaalI aq|
qiSb,lOOqor6or. 9o.o9:9oQF.ffi 6et ee.boOGetqoaseegtcit Ght,SgriteeQn,anoeg
gnouiae JeqieeepcraqogiOoreogetQeLPGEe 6g66'qe6 eoeOqq e" Ooo{q'" 9o!-.
n€offi,ooodeeotqoqar Gfio a{qe6t s"€iti

gEao6aeo eerd;eQdr,geenqeqsdardree
sqiaun6lc's6oogqo allqtgl, o6eeotqs"gt
re eoq''aetpcaaEererQor, geg eor{gor0o
rs gole aaolaggte,gone, flaar s atod ag je .:
aqre ega6 t<866o eqOe aej eeee0qo6e Eqrom6 t
il
(e) o66edlsoqot grorqo|6e eeoEetq'l69etqEet60 66i$qeeoI
ie)qee sa11eO6ee6rooqol otd a6o eee€ sQegsrce6'dooeo qx{q erQoe6org4er .i
edlaQer$ 6eeo.tr.
(e) o6eeoEq|g$e errit QqEerOal./{e" gglGogeq_gror got6aGaQqel (oerlqoeraooAtqO) ::.,'; ,)i
6.s6fleQ$Ssqes s"o I ' '::
Colgigr69geea gt6'1s otoiqg 6ee'etiraseeoeae6'loQ grfla eqo$il ' .. .-':
soeo|ge,ronr.6$caqlec'oqq|e,rlolglo,fl6q{'(aearodoerroqeeQ'l q6diojee,gqeo 6adS
eerd,eedrq6qe atslo6e'qQ6eto6'gQHtremoGetld6Q6oG€ere6o6c[eeloot-6eei sE+,
ae,og_ggrQe 9690€60frEeereo'lEe-a6e oeno6Qarordoqe c$Ol6Q6ti:vo.o9.goerQE
6er ee.otrOfureRSeo eeteir
ru-1,eerdte'q€n,eleooa qlfioglacaedo e€iemtbqa qHol6€
ggr6ot-PGqtq 6qt6qqefr eoee q6.se9o9 {c," eor 016onrfr edaiulOagardenaeo 6q.
aogroee6oi66c'l
qE66' gag Q€qse 6qq oreso QGet otd odeeou qol€' q.$ql0eQeeot (Environmental
frp""t n"S*rment) {SF <ete 6dta1e1qt3 (ExecutivaSummdry)0oat <en:o"etet or'ordei
6edqo gnereq.eofrGot6et
'j,- '
e.Gnronqqtniqtca, eettitt
s.6ardeeeg,eeteil I
*r.Gorodeoqer fftet aqent, eeritt -i
u.eJer
erdcmd oss'{/Qer,elfia€qqQ'
orfigquoAaa{eerd,eqflre66€'d '" ' ql8€qa-oe'{
- '
"er,['
e,e,qesJeqeoeerd,e6€l,g6'6€'qo
e.Jraacerqiries, I ."
*:
l=^:^ -=-. '
9. G'sae bdeee(o66efl)6oio, eoqrQQolo,Ee6eqeI
soqeroe oQeeaiago,eqorrecGeooro6irpt snro (Executive sQatse'o"eieji
Sijmmary)
'+
orOibeOteq gqao 6aeo eerd, 6qq
eOtir nat
Aful6o
www.ospcboard,orgq
slo€'. I
q 6€aee sQa6; Geootore eret qql6t Faqd €e[i, sQoroala6q et(iqre€i,Qa6qQa 0e aruOgi
ab{arff Onrqe6eqO0oqel etritraa5O€aql qQaq'al?-I'otgi6o}8salo$l€Il6aI
qt./- aas{
@@-'f'F4gt ffi
\ clDt- 06,
r-l', | ^
b'l{EtQ'(r
€F
L fi-V
- Date6992/ tND-lt-pH-249 Date12.06.2018
I
I
AnV who is likely to be affectedby the grant of EnvironmentralCtearance.

1 PeFon
B' Any Fersonr'vhoo$4ns:hissgnlr-d ow91p,e-nni#with rspect
. has been submiftedfor environmenat to application
"rtrl"t "n
"fa5i6=n*.
c. Aniyassociafion of pe-rsons-whelhqincorporated or rikely
- to be
- - affected
-": -'-' by the project
and / or functioningin the fleld of environmern
D' local authoritywithin any"partof whose limit is within the neighborhood,
SV project wherein
the is proposed to bd tbcated.
sd/-
MEMBFBS.€CRenRy
T 7/m u
)t/
Wtn&obf t\ t-EF.k
Public Hearing Photographs

27082018xkwk3azbeia PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

27082018xkwk3azbeia PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

27082018xkwk3azbeia PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

PROPOSED LPG BOTTLING PLANT KHORDHA

M/s INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1. INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT AND PROJECT PROPONENT .......................................... 13

2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT ......................................................................................................................... 32

EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha

3.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................. 47

4.1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 91

5.1 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY........................................................................................... 105

6.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 106

7.1. PUBLIC CONSULTATION..................................................................................................... 112

8.1 PROJECT BENEFITS .................................................................................................................... 163

EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha

CHAPTER 10 - ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................... 168

10.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 168

11.1. CONSULTANTS ENGAGED .................................................................................................... 178

Table E.2 : Salient Features of Proposed Project ............................................................................ 3

Table E.3: Project Capacity ............................................................................................................ 4

Table E.4: Water Balance ............................................................................................................... 5

Table E.5: Details of Fire Tanks ..................................................................................................... 5

Table E-6: Schedule of Fire Pumps ................................................................................................ 6

Table-E-7:Summary of the Meteorological Data Generated At Site .............................................. 6

Table 1.1: Project and Project Proponent Description .................................................................. 14

Table 1.2: Environmental Setting ................................................................................................. 15

Table-2.1: Land Break Up ............................................................................................................ 33

Table 2.2: Salient Features of Proposed facility ........................................................................... 34

Table 2.3: Non-Plant Shed/Building ............................................................................................. 41

EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha

Table 2.5: Brief Description of Facilities ..................................................................................... 42

Table 2.6: Electrical Systems ........................................................................................................ 43

Table 2.7: Proposed fire fighting facilites..................................................................................... 43

Table 2.8: Water Balance Table.................................................................................................... 44

Table 2.9: Non-Hazardous Waste ................................................................................................. 45

Table 2.10: Hazardous waste ........................................................................................................ 45

Table 3.1: Landuse / Landcover Statistics of Area within 10 km Radius..................................... 51

Table 3.2: Meteorological Monitoring At Site ............................................................................. 55

Table 3.3: Meteorological Data Recorded at Site ......................................................................... 55

Table 3.4: Techniques Used For Ambient Air Quality Monitoring.............................................. 58

Table 3.5: Ambient Air Monitoring Locations ............................................................................. 58

Table 3.6: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Results .................................................................. 60

Table 3.8: Ambient Noise Monitoring Results ............................................................................. 63

Table 3.9: Ambient Noise Standards ............................................................................................ 64

Table 3.10: Water Quality Sampling Locations .......................................................................... 65

Table 3.11: Ground Water Characteristics.................................................................................... 67

Table 3.12: Surface Water Characteristics.................................................................................... 69

Table 3.13: Soil Sampling Stations in the Study Area.................................................................. 71

Table 3.14(A): Chemical Characteristics of Soil in the Study Area ............................................. 71

Table 3.14(B):Standard Classification of Soil .............................................................................. 72

Table 3.15: List of Flora Observed In the Study Area .................................................................. 73

Table 3.16: List of Fauna Observed in the Study Area................................................................. 74

EIA Report for LPG Bottling Plant at Somanathpur, Khordha, Odisha

Table-3.18: Name Of The Location: Near Noonmati Bus Stop ................................................... 88

Table-3.19:Traffic Survey of Lean & Peak Hrs............................................................................ 89

Table 3.20.: PCU Factors on Urban Roads .................................................................................. 89

Table 3.21: Level of Service ......................................................................................................... 90

Table 4.1: Impact Matrix .............................................................................................................. 99