1.

Introduction

Waste Water Treatment Plan Development Project Kap 16,000 m3 / day, the project
description is as follows
Keterangan
Construction of a Waste Water Treatment Plan Cap 16,000
The project name m3 / day
Location Makassar
Function Water Treatment
Number of floors 1
Structural Systems Wall Structure

This building is designed to meet the requirements contained in the regulations and
procedures as follows:
SNI Reference Reference Title
SNI 1726:2012 Earthquake Resistant Planning Procedures for Building and
Non-building Structures
SNI 1727:2013 Minimum Load for Building Plans and Other Structures
SNI 2847:2013 Structural Concrete Requirements for Buildings
SNI 1729:2015 Procedure for planning steel structures for buildings

2. Material Structure and Quality System

2.1 Structural Systems
The lateral retaining structural system for the Construction of a 16,000 m3 / day Kap
Water Treatment Plan is a Special Reinforced Sliding Wall System.

2.1 Material quality

2.2 Concrete

All concrete is standard concrete, type weight = 24 kN / m3, unless otherwise

stated,with the value fc 'based on the strength of the cylinder test material
1. Pile Foundation fc’ = 45,00 Mpa

2. Pilecap, Tie Beam, Coulumn (lt.11 s/d atap),Beam, fc’ = 35,00

Mpa

1
2.2.2 Steel reinforcement
The quality of the reinforcement steel used is Fy = 400 Mpa for all the underlying
reinforcement ASTM 615-M.
2.2.3 Steel Profiles
The steel quality that will be used for steel structures is BJ37 with
Fy = 240 Mpa,
Fu= 370 Mpa

3. Loads of work
The loading regulations used in planning follow the provisions in force in
Indonesia. In general, the loading rules that are used include:
1. SNI 1726: 2012 Earthquake Resilience Planning Procedures for Building and Non-

Building Structures.SNI 1727:2013 Minimum Load for Building Plans and Other

Structures.

2. SNI 1727: 2013 Minimum Load for Building Design and Other Structures.

2
3.1 Dead load and live load

3
4
 3.2 Earthquake load

The earthquake load used follows the procedures of SNI 1726: 2012 based on the
maximum earthquake acceleration considered risk-targeted, MCER. The spectrum
response parameters used in the design are presented in Table 3 which shows the
classification of SE (soft soil) site classes. The spectrum response graph used for
design is shown in Figure 1.

3.3 Tabel 3. Parameter Respons Spektrum

Parameter SCORE
Risk Category IV
Priority Factors (Ie) 1.5
Mapped Acceleration Spectral Ss = 0.32g; S1 = 0.141g
Site Class E
Site Class Coefficient Fa = 2.268; Fv = 3.378
Spectral Acceleration Response Sds = 0.488 g; Sd1 = 0.317 g
Seismic Design Category D

0.500
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
-
0 1 2 3 4 5

Drawing 1. Spectral response design of the Waste Water Treatment Plan Cap
16,000 m3 / day

5
4. MODELING
The models created for conducting the analysis are as follows:
Model 1 : 3D Building with clamping level on the 1st floor
The analysis procedure uses the Capital Response Spectrum Analysis.Conceptually, the
modeling and analysis procedure can be seen in Figure 2. In conducting the analysis, a
cross-section of the crack is used with a modification factor to the flexural stiffness and
torque as listed in Table 4.
Table 4. Stiffness Modification Factors

Modification factor Modification factor

bending stiffness torsional stiffness
Beam 0.35 0.365
coloumn 0.70 1
Plate 0.25 1
Shearwall 0.35 1

R = 1.5

Picture 2 Sketch modeling and analysis procedures

6
 5. ANALYSIS RESULTS
5.1. Analysis results due to earthquake load
Dynamic analysis results obtained.

Tabel 1. Design parameters and seismic base shear

Category Risk Iv
Priority Factor Ie = 1.5
Mapped Acceleration Spectral Ss = 0.322
S1 = 0.141
Site Class E
Site Class Coefficient Fa = 2.268
Fv = 3.378
Spectral Acceleration Response SDs = 0.488
SD1 = 0.317
Seismic Design Category KDS = E
Lateral System
Modified Response Coefficient R = (Atas) 1.5
System Strength-over factors Ωo = 2.5
Enlargement Factors Deflection Cd = 1.5
Period structure Tx model = 0.177
Ty model = 0.177

NOTE:
1) The factor 0.85 is used based on the provisions of the SNI 1726: 2012 style scale article 7.9.4
2) Use more powerful factors, Ωo = 3.0
3) Consider the application of orthogonal forces simultaneously (100% + 30% orthogonal)

6. UNDERSTANDING OF REDUNDANCE STRUCTURE AND

FACTORSK

7
 6.1. Non-structural Structure
Structural irregularity requirements are evaluated and fulfilled in accordance with SNI
1726: 2012. Evaluation results can be seen in Table 7 and Table 8.

Table 7. Vertical irregularity in structures with KDS D

Requirements that must be met

Article
if this type of Regularity was Information
Type Reference
found
1a.
Irregularities in Soft Level Rigidity
Tabel 13
Response Spectrum Analysis Response Spectrum Analysis
Variety or Procedure History (SNI Variety already done
Seismic Response so type of irregularity
1726:2012)
This type does not need to be checked

1b.
Irregularity Excessive Soft Level Stiffness

Tabel 13 Response Spectrum Analysis

Response Spectrum Analysis
Variety already done
Variety or Procedure History (SNI
so type of irregularity
Seismic Response
1726:2012) This type does not need to be checked

2.
Severe Irregularity
Tabel 13 Response Spectrum Analysis
Response Spectrum Analysis
Variety already done
Variety or Procedure History (SNI
so type of irregularity
Seismic Response
1726:2012) This type does not need to be checked

3.
Vertical Geometry Irregularity

Tabel 13 Response Spectrum Analysis

Response Spectrum Analysis
Variety already done
Variety or Procedure History (SNI
so type of irregularity
Seismic Response
1726:2012) This type does not need to be checked

Table 8 Vertical irregularity in structures with KDS D (Continued in Table 7)

Requirements that must be met if Article

Type Information
this type of irregularity is found Reference

Enhanced style for design

This condition is not found
collector and connection 7.3.3.4
for this building
4. Disconnection of Field Direction in Irregularity diaphragm
of Retaining Elements Vertical Lateral Force Response Spectrum Analysis Tabel 13 This condition is not found
Variety or Procedure History

8
 Seismic Response for this building

More powerful factor for

components This condition is not found
supporting elements are not 7.3.3.3
for this building
continuous

5a.Discontiunity in Strong Lateral Level

Irregularities
Response Spectrum Analysis
Analisis Spektrum Respons Tabel 13
Variety already done
Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat
(SNI so type of irregularity
Respons Seismik
1726:2012) This type does not need to be checked

5b.Discontiunity in Strong Irregularities Lateral Tabel 13

Analisis Spektrum Respons
Excessive Levels Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat (SNI
Respons Seismik
1726:2012)
This check has been carried out. This
7.3.3.1 condition did not occur in this building.
Types of irregularities that are not
(SNI
permitted
1726:2012)

Table 9. Horizontal irregularities in structures with KDS D

Requirements that must be met
Article
Type if this type of irregularity is Information
Reference
found
1a.Irregular Torque Enhanced style for design
7.3.3.4 This condition is not found
collector and connection
diaphragm (SNI1726:2012) for this building

Enlarge torque moment not

No torque magnification moment 7.8.4.3 suspected already done
expected (SNI1726:2012) (see Figure 9 for values
torque amplification)
7.7.3 3-dimensional analysis already
3-dimensional analysis
(SNI1726:2012)) done

Intersection checking 7.12.1 Deviation checking

floor (SNI1726:2012) between floors already done
(see Figure 5)
Analisis Spektrum Respons Tabel 13 Response Spectrum Analysis
Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat
(SNI1726:2012) Variety already done
Respons Seismik
1b.Excessive Torque Irregularity Enhanced style for design This check is already
7.3.3.4
collector and connection done. This condition occurs
diaphragm (SNI1726:2012) on the tower and on the podium
Enlarge torque moment not
7.8.4.3 suspected already done
No torque magnification moment
(SNI1726:2012) (see Figure 10 for values
expected
torque amplification)
7.7.3 3-dimensional analysis already
3-dimensional analysis
(SNI1726:2012) Done

7.12.1 Deviation checking

Intersection checking
between floors already done
floor (SNI1726:2012) (see Figure 5)

Analisis Spektrum Respons Tabel 13 Response Spectrum Analysis

9
 Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat (SNI1726:2012) Variety already done
Respons Seismik
2.Inner irregularity Enhanced style for design 7.3.3.4
collector and connection
(SNI1726:2012)
diaphragm
This check is already
done. This condition does not occur
Analisis Spektrum Respons Tabel 13
in this building.
Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat
(SNI1726:2012)
Respons Seismik

3Irregularity Discontinuity Enhanced style for design 7.3.3.4

Diaphragm collector and connection
diaphragm
Analisis Spektrum Respons
Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat
Respons Seismik
(SNI1726:2012)
This check is already
done. This condition is not
Tabel 13 going well on the floor
podium or tower floor.
(SNI1726:2012)

4. Irregularity in Shifts Analisis Spektrum Respons 7.3.3.4

Transverse Against Fields Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat
Respons Seismik (SNI1726:2012)
7.7.3
3-dimensional analysis
(SNI1726:2012)
Analisis Spektrum Respons Tabel 13 Conditions not found in this building
Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat
(SNI1726:2012)
Respons Seismik

More powerful factor for 7.3.3.3

components
(SNI1726:2012)
supporting elements are not
continuous
5.Irregularity of Non-parallel Systems 7.7.3
3-dimensional analysis
(SNI1726:2012)
Analisis Spektrum Respons Tabel 13
Ragam atau Prosedur Riwayat Conditions not found in this building
(SNI1726:2012)
Respons Seismik
Orthogonal earthquake 7.5.3
combination
(SNI1726:2012)
simultaneously

6.2. Redundancy Factor

Determination of redundancy factors for structures classified as seismic design A in

the seismic design area D.

7. Combination of Loading and Strength Reducing Factors
7.1. Lower Structure

Loads held by each foundation based on a combination of loading were obtained from the
analysis of Model 2. The following describes the combination of loading used to check the
bearing capacity of the foundation and reinforcement of the pile

7.1.1. Combination of loading for the bearing capacity of the foundation

The combination of loading used to check the bearing capacity of the foundation in
accordance with SNI 1726: 2012 and ASCE 7-10 is as follows:

10
a. Combination of loading the bearing capacity of the pole by reviewing the gravity load
No D1) L+Lr Ex Ey F (Uplift)
1 1 0.75 - - -
1a)
2 1 - - - 1

b.The combination of loading the carrying capacity of the pole by reviewing the effect of
the earthquake load with Pijin x 1.32)
No D1) L+Lr Ex Ey F (Uplift)
1-4 1+0.14SDS - 0.635) ρ 0.1895) ρ -
5-8 1+0.14SDS - 0.189 ρ 0.63 ρ -
9 – 12 1+0.105 SDS 0.75 0.4725 ρ 0.1418 ρ
13 – 16 1+0.105 SDS 0.75 0.1418 ρ 0.4725 ρ

c. The combination of loading the carrying capacity of the pole by reviewing the effect of
earthquake loads with over-strength factor (Ωo) with Pijin x 1.3 x 1.26)
No D1) L+Lr Ex Ey F (Uplift)
1-4 1+0.14SDS - 0.63 Ωo 0.189 Ωo -
5-8 1+0.14SDS - 0.189 Ωo 0.63 Ωo -
9 – 12 1+0.105 SDS 0.75 0.4725 Ωo 0.1418 Ωo
13 – 16 1+0.105 SDS 0.75 0.1418 Ωo 0.4725 Ωo

Note :
1. D = SW (Self Weight) + SIDL ( Superimposed Dead Load)
1.a. Especially in combination with the uplift load, the calculated D load only comes from SW (Self
Weight). D = SW (Self Weight).
2. Pijin may be multiplied by a factor of 1.3 because the load that occurs is a transient load
(temporary load)
3. Specifically for earthquakes with an overstrength factor (Ωo), in Table C, the redundancy factor, ρ =
1.0 (because the load combination used is to use a strong-over factor: SNI 1726:2012 pasal 7.3.4.1;
ASCE 7-10 Sect. 12.3.4.1).
4. SNI 1726:2012 pasal 7.4.2.2; ASCE 7-10 Sect. 12.4.2.2 : The effect of vertical earthquake load (Ev
= 0.2 SDS D) is allowed = 0 when: SDS < 0.125
5. SNI 1726: 2012 article 7.13.4; ASCE 7-10 Sect. 12.1.3.4: The effect of ground-face-contact topping
is permitted to be reduced by 10 percent for structural foundations designed in accordance with the
analysis requirements of variance (modal response spectrum analysis).
6. SNI 1726: 2012 article 7.4.3.3; ASCE 7-10 Sect. 12.4.3.3: When Allowable Stress Design (ASD) is
used for an earthquake with an overstrength factor, then Pijin can be multiplied by a factor of 1.2.

11
 7.2. Upper Structure
7.2.1. Load Combination

In accordance with SNI 1726: 2012, the combination of earthquake loading used
for the design of the structural elements above is shown in Table 10 and determined
by considering the following:
1) The effect of an earthquake is considered to work in 2 directions simultaneously,
i.e. 100% of the earthquake in the main direction combined with 30% of the
earthquake in the perpendicular direction.
2) The effect of vertical earthquake is also calculated according to SNI 1726: 2012
article 7.4.2.2.Ev = 0.2 SDS D
7.2.2. Strength Reduction Factor

In accordance with SNI 2847: 2013, the value of the power reduction factor used in the
design is shown in table 11.
Tabel 11Strength Reduction Factor

Structure Components
Strength reduction factor, Φ
Controlled pull-out 0.9
Press controlled cross section with spiral reinforcement 0.75
Other bony press controlled sections 0.65
Shear and torque 0.75
Torque 0.75
Pile on concrete 0.65

8. CONCRETE RETURN PLANNING PLAN

Planning of reinforced concrete reinforcement is carried out on structural elements,
namely plates, beams and columns.

8.1. Reinforcement of Lower Structure Elements

Reinforcement of the lower structure is done by modeling all foundation elements such as:
pilecap, basement plate, tie beam and pole spring. By modeling the entire foundation
elements, the structure behavior is easier to calculate and analyze. Calculation of pilecap
and basement plates with the help of a program.

8.2. Reinforcement of Upper Structural Elements

12
8.2.1. Plate Calculation

On the floor of this building, the floor system is plates and beams.

8.2.2. Column calculation

In column calculation, the internal forces obtained will be processed by the program
directly. In principle, the column is calculated by biaxial bending, which is sought by the
concept of interaction diagram with the strain compatibility procedure for each column of
replicate columns. Here the column reinforcement configuration is not simplified by taking
a "reinforcing steel ring" on the effective circumference of the column, but it does read the
reinforcement configuration according to the given input.
1. The planning procedure is as follows: Calculate the surface of the load-biaxial
moment interaction. In this case 49 interaction curves are made with 51 points on
each curve.
2. Check the capacity of each column for axial forces and biaxial moments that have
been multiplied by the safety factor according to the combination of loading
specified in clause 7.2. for both ends of the column.
3. Calculate the ratio of load to column strength, which can be seen as OC / OL in the
sketch of Figure 10.
4. Plan the shear reinforcement for the ductile - frame, based on the existing latitude
combined with the latitude of the moment of the actual cross section capacity.

Vu style is calculated as:

13
Where Mu is calculated in the direction of a particular axis according to Fiture 9

Picture 8. Bi-axial column diagrams

14
Picture 9. Strain distribution idealization

15
Picture 10. Geometric representation for column capacity ratio

Picture 11 The moment of your capacity at Pu

16
8.2.3.Concept of Calculation of Retaining Walls

In calculating retaining walls

1) Determining the Ground Pressure

2) Determining the Ground Pressure
3) Press the ground due to load evenly on the surface
4) Determine the maximum moment of 2 directions X and Y at ¼ L and ½ L
5) Design reinforcement that is used using a maximum of 2-moment moment data
6) Control plate deflection 240 / L

17
3D VIEW

18
Land Compressive Load (Soil)

19
Water Press Load

20
Plan of base plate

21
Floor plan of the concrete wall separating tank

22
 9. CALCULATION OF TIE BEAM
SIZE TIE BEAM 350 x 700

23
Using 350 x 700 uk tie beam with 0.5 tie tie ratio and reinforcement
The Tie Beam structure is declared feasible

24
10. CALCULATION OF FLOOR PLATE
10.1 CALCULATION OF FLOOR PLATE

Moment on the floor plate

25
Calculation of bending reinforcement on the base floor plate is 40 cm thick

26
27
D19-100 is used for reinforcement on structural plates Thk 40 cm

28
 11. Column Calculation
400 x 400 column

Column Element Details (Summary)

Elemen Unique Section Combo Station Length
Level LLRF Type
t Name ID ID Loc (mm)
Sway
Story7 C13 13 C 40/40 Comb2 0 6000 0.857
Special

Section Properties
Cover (Torsion)
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm)
(mm)
400 400 62 27.3

Material Properties
Lt.Wt Factor
Ec (MPa) f'c (MPa) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
(Unitless)
25742.96 30 1 400 240

Design Code Parameters

ΦT ΦCTied ΦCSpiral ΦVns ΦVs ΦVjoint Ω0
0.9 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.6 0.85 2

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Capacity
Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar %
Ratio
N N-mm N-mm N-mm N-mm %
Unitless
1304076.3
7.193E-05 -58101033.7 35523039.9 35523039.9 1.51 0.534
5

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

Effective
Cm Factor δns Factor δs Factor K Factor
Length
Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless
mm

29
 Effective
Cm Factor δns Factor δs Factor K Factor
Length
Unitless Unitless Unitless Unitless
mm
Major
1 1.635587 1 1 6000
Bend(M3)
Minor
1 1.635587 1 1 6000
Bend(M2)

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear ΦVc Shear ΦVs Shear ΦVp Rebar Av /s
N N N N mm²/mm
Major, Vu2 10482.69 146749.56 0 0 0
Minor, Vu3 0 146749.56 0 0 0

12. WALL STRUCTURE

ETABS Retaining Wall Design

30
A diagram of the bending moment that occurs in a wall due to soil pressure
Calculation of bending reinforcement in the structural wall

31
D19-100 is used for bending walls with a wall thickness of 30 cm

32
 ETABS Retaining Wall Design

Bending moment diagram that occurs in the wall due to water pressure
Calculation of bending reinforcement in the structural wall

33
D19-100 is used for bending walls with a wall thickness of 40 cm

34
13. FOUNDATION Base reaction from ETABS program

In combo 2 Gravity Load 1.2DL + 1LLObtained W 322.7 Tons

Pile capacity at a depth of ± 16 m 103.4 tons

35