Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oral Communication
Oral Communication
is the general term given to a wide range of cognitive and intellectual skills
needed to:
a) effectively identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments
b) discover and overcome, personal prejudices and biases
c) formulate and present convincing reasons in support of conclusions
d) make reasonable, intelligent decisions about what to believe and
what to do
DOMAINS
- Cognitive
- Psychomotor
- Affective
TYPES OF THINKING
Decision Making
Problem Solving
STANDARDS
Accuracy - a statement can be clear but not accurate
: Is that really true?
: How could we check that?
: How could we find out if that is true?
Precision - a statement can be both clear and accurate, but not precise
: Could you give me more details?
: Could you be more specific?
Relevance - a statement can be clear, accurate, and precise, but not relevant to
the question at issue
: How is that connected to the question?
: How does that bear on the issue?
Depth/Breadth - a statement can be clear, accurate, precise, and relevant, but
superficial; dealing with the most significant factors; necessary,
beneficial, practicable
: How does your answer address the complexities in the question?
: How are you taking into account the problems in the question?
: Is that dealing with the most significant factors?
Logic - when the combination o thoughts are mutually supporting and make
sense in combination, the thinking is “logical”
: Does this really make sense?
: Does that follow from what you said?
: But before you implied this and now you are saying that […], how can both
be true?
Fairness - open-minded; free of distorting biases and preconceptions
: Is it impartial?
Clarity
: Could you express that in another way?
Academic Reading
TYPES OF READING
Developmental Reading - aims to develop the student’s reading skills (e.g.
SRA - Science Reading Associate)
Pleasure Reading - passive type; providing enjoyment and entertainment
Functional Reading - learn basic functioning; academic reading
Remedial Reading - correct the effects of poor teaching and learning
Graphic Organizers
4. Problem-Solution Map - displays the nature of the problem and how it can be
solved; usually contains the problem’s description, its causes and effects,
and logical solutions
5. Timeline - used to show how events occurred chronologically through a long base
labeled with dates and specific events; can be linear (shows how events
happened within one period) or comparative (shows two sets of events that
happened within the same period)
Linear Timeline
6. Plot Diagram - tool used to map events in a story; used to analyze the major parts
of a plot; the major events to be placed in the plot diagram are:
a) Exposition - the initial part where the characters, settings, and
relationships are established
b) Inciting moment - the part which brings about the change or the
conflict
c) Rising action - the section where the conflict and the characters are
developed
d) Climax - the highest point of the story where the major events are
confronted
e) Falling action - the events immediately following the climax which
lead to the closure of the conflict
f) Resolution - the conclusion or closure of the story
7. Series of Events Chain - used to show the logical sequence of events
10. Persuasion Map - used to map out arguments and evidence that prove a
viewpoint; essentially useful when processing persuasive or
argumentative texts
Types of Claims
Proof requires:
a) sufficient and appropriate grounds
b) reliable authority
c) recent data
d) accurate, typical data
e) clearly defined terms- no loaded language
f) a clear distinction between fact and inference
Claims of Value - (taste and morals / good-bad) make value judgments/ resolve
conflict between values/ quasi policy (rightness of it; relative merit)
Proof requires:
a) establishing standards of evaluation (i.e. a warrant that defines what
constitutes instances of the relevant value)
b) note the priority of the value in this instance
c) establish the advantage (practical or moral) of your standards
d) use examples to clarify abstract values
e) use credible authorities for support
Claims of Policy (action / should or ought) - usually involves sub-claims of fact
and value
Proof requires:
a) making proposed action clear
b) need (justification)
c) plan, (must be workable)
d) benefit (advantages)
e) consider opposition / counter arguments
Logical Fallacies
False Dilemma
: black and white, either; two options only stated instead of many
Appeal to Ignorance (Argumentum ad Ignorantiam)
: something is instantly concluded to be true just because it is not proven to
be false, and vice versa
Slippery Slope
: a series of increasingly superficial and unacceptable consequence is drawn
Complex Question
: two or more points are rolled into one and the reader is expected to either
accept or reject both at the same time, when one point may be
satisfactory while the other is not
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad Baculum)
: when a threat, instead of reasoning, is used to argue
Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad Misericordiam)
: when the element of pity is used instead of logical reasoning
Appeal to Consequences (Argumentum ad Consequentiam)
: when unpleasant consequences of believing something are pointed out to
show that the belief is false
Bandwagon (Argumentum ad Populum)
: when an argument is considered to be valid because it is what the majority
thinks
Red Herring Policy
: not answering the question
Attacking the Person (Argumentum ad Hominem)
: refute an argument by attacking the character of a person
Appeal to Authority
: argument quotes an expert who is not qualified in the particular subject
matter
Anonymous Authority
: authority in question is not mentioned or named
Hasty Generalization
: a sample is not significant/enough to support a generalization about a
population
False Analogy
: a writer assumes that two concepts are similar in some ways are also
similar in other ways
Accident
: a general rule is applied to a situation even when it should be an exception
Post Hoc
: the arguer claims that since event A happened before event B, A is the
cause of B
Wrong Direction
: when the direction between cause and effect is reversed
Complex Cause
: the explanation for an event is reduced to one thing when there are other
factors which also contributed to the event
Irrelevant Conclusion
: an argument which is supposed to prove something concludes something
else instead
Straw Man
: the position of the opposition is twisted so that it is easier to refute
Affirming the Consequent
: occurs when any argument of the form if A is the true then B is true; if B is
true, therefore A is true
Hypothetical
Proposition
Antecedent Consequent
if then (,)
Example: If you send memes, then I love you. Therefore, if I love you, then
you send memes. (tagging @/K, ay ang kalat)
Denying the Antecedent
: if A is true then B is true; if A is not true then B is not true
Example: If you send memes, then I love you. Therefore, if you don’t send
memes, then I don’t love you.