Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tribal Benchmarking Report (Strictly For Internal Circulation Only)
Tribal Benchmarking Report (Strictly For Internal Circulation Only)
July 2014
University of Gloucestershire – Benchmarking Project July 2014
Copyright
This report © Tribal Education Limited 2014.
Camille Stallard has agreed on behalf of the University of Gloucestershire that these documents will be treated in the
strictest confidence and are covered by a mutually inclusive confidentiality agreement. These documents are not to be
published, copied or disclosed in any way, in part or in whole, nor will they be used by any person other than with the
express permission of the above named person. The Client acknowledges that the disclosure of the information may be
prejudicial to the Company’s commercial interests. Requests to disclose any of the information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 must involve notifying the Company and giving the Company the opportunity to make
representations to the University prior to information release. In addition, it has been agreed that Tribal Education
Limited has ownership and exclusive rights of the use of this Total Benchmarking technique.
Unless otherwise stated, Tribal owns the copyright in this document including the content, page layout, graphical
images, logos, photographs and trademarks. With the exception of permitted fair dealing under the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act 1998, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means or
stored in any electronic retrieval system without prior written permission of Tribal. All moral rights in the contents of this
document are hereby asserted.
Liability
In preparing this report Tribal Education Limited (Tribal) has taken great care to verify that the information contained
herein is accurate. In doing so it has had recourse to a great deal of information provided by the University of
Gloucestershire and by other clients in the same sector. Tribal has worked with the University’s management to identify
the possible opportunities for the improvement and development of the University’s business and the possible ways
these may be achieved. Even so, any action taken as a result of this benchmarking project is the sole responsibility of
University, and Tribal cannot share any responsibility for these actions.
Contents
blank
Introduction
Section 1.1 Methodology and Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 8
Section 1.2 Benchmark Comparators ........................................................................................................................... 9
Section 1.3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 9
Databank Structure
Section 2.1 Overall University Model ............................................................................................................................ 12
Section 2.2 Teaching Activity ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Section 2.3 Research & Enterprise Activity................................................................................................................... 13
Executive Summary
Section 3.1 Key Findings and Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 16
Results Overview
Section 4.1 Overall Financial Situation ......................................................................................................................... 23
Section 4.2 Overall Income & Cost Summary ............................................................................................................... 24
Section 4.3 Principal Activities ...................................................................................................................................... 25
Section 4.4 Teaching..................................................................................................................................................... 26
Section 4.5 Research and Enterprise Activity ............................................................................................................... 27
Section 4.6 Support ....................................................................................................................................................... 28
Section 4.7 Associated Activities .................................................................................................................................. 31
Supporting Tables
Section 6.1 Overall Financial Situation ......................................................................................................................... 53
Section 6.2 Overall Income & Costs Summary ............................................................................................................. 54
Section 6.3 Principal Activities ...................................................................................................................................... 55
Section 6.4 Teaching..................................................................................................................................................... 57
Section 6.5 Research & Enterprise Activity................................................................................................................... 65
Section 6.6 Support ....................................................................................................................................................... 67
Section 6.7 Library Services ......................................................................................................................................... 69
Section 6.8 IT Services ................................................................................................................................................. 73
Section 6.9 Student Services ........................................................................................................................................ 77
Section 6.10 Registry .................................................................................................................................................... 81
Section 6.11 Finance..................................................................................................................................................... 85
Section 6.12 Human Resources & Staff Training ......................................................................................................... 89
Section 6.13 Marketing.................................................................................................................................................. 93
Section 6.14 Corporate Administration ......................................................................................................................... 97
Section 6.15 Facilities ................................................................................................................................................... 101
Section 6.16 Estates ..................................................................................................................................................... 105
Section 6.17 Associated Activities ................................................................................................................................ 111
Section 6.18 Capital & Financing .................................................................................................................................. 113
Faculty Analysis
Section 7.1 Internal Faculty Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 117
Section 7.2 External Faculty Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 118
Glossary
Section 8 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................ 128
Section 1 Introduction
Section 1 Introduction
Tribal Education Limited (Tribal) was commissioned to undertake a “Total Financial Benchmarking” assessment of the
University of Gloucestershire. The application of the Tribal benchmarking model involves the comprehensive analysis
of various data sets covering a full year’s results (usually the most recent complete academic/financial year); including
all income and expenditure, all categories of staffing and an analysis of space usage, plus key measurements of
activity from various academic and support departments. Tribal consultants collect information within a common
framework and then, in conjunction with the University, analyse this according to the standard Tribal function driven
model. In this way, Tribal overcomes the different organisational structures within each university and hence are able
to provide robust like-for-like benchmarks. For example:
A Faculty Administrator may spend 50% of his/her time on admissions and 50% supporting teaching. In the Tribal
model 50% of this person, and their associated cost, will appear as a cost of Registry and 50% as a cost of Teaching.
It is important to recognise therefore that the total cost of any function is likely to include costs from more than one
department.
The result of the Tribal analysis is over 750 objective measurements covering all aspects of the University’s activities.
These are split into four main areas:
1) Principal Activities – this is the prime area of analysis and contains the main academic activities of Teaching,
Research and Enterprise activity, together with the various support functions, including Library Services, IT Services,
Student Services, Registry, Finance, Human Resources & Staff Training, Marketing, Corporate Administration,
Facilities and Estates.
2) Associated Activities – these are the non-academic ‘commercial’ activities of the University, including Catering,
Residences, Crèche / Nursery, Shops, Franchising / Licensing activity, Student Union and sports activities.
3) Capital & Financing – income and costs relating to the funding of the University (inherited liabilities, interest
charges, depreciation, etc).
4) Incomparable Items – any one-off or exceptional items of income or expenditure, usually of a non-recurrent nature
(e.g. restructuring costs).
Comparisons are then made against other similar universities that have also been objectively assessed using the Tribal
benchmarking model, to provide management with a full list of potential opportunities for action. For comparative
purposes, Tribal’s methodology uses various measures of activity to convert financial data into meaningful indicators.
Finally, there is further subjective discussion with management to debate these potential opportunities, bearing in mind
the institution’s situation and its needs.
We have provided three benchmarks, taken from our databank of recently completed HE benchmarking projects:
Peer Group – The average of 7 universities selected by you, namely – Bath Spa, Bedfordshire, Canterbury Christ
Church, Chester, Chichester, Southampton Solent and West London.
Wider Group – The average of the 23 most recently completed benchmarks.
2010/11 – The results of your previous benchmarking analysis on the 2010/11 year.
We would like to extend our thanks to those staff at the University of Gloucestershire that have been involved in the
University benchmarking project for their co-operation and assistance during our work.
The diagram below illustrates the structure of the Tribal Benchmarking Model. All activity for the University of
Gloucestershire was identified and categorised according to standard Tribal Benchmarking methodology.
OVERALL UNIVERSITY
RESIDENCES
FRANCHISING / LICENSING
REGISTRY
OTHER ACTIVITIES
FINANCE
MARKETING
CORPORATE
ADMINISTRATION
FACILITIES
ESTATES
SUBDIVIDE
INTO
TEACHING ACTIVITY
MIX OF STAFF
PAY LEVELS
STUDENT/STAFF RATIO
NON-PAY COSTS
OVERALL MARGIN
ANALYSIS INCLUDES
The University generated an overall historical cost surplus of £4.8 million for the year on income of £69.2 million.
Adjusted to your size, the Peer Group benchmark achieved a surplus of £5.5 million, £738,000 higher than your
surplus.
Pay costs overall were £670,000 higher than benchmark. Delivery staff pay costs were £802,000 higher, the result of
having 3.4 fewer staff (FTEs) offset by 6.9% higher average pay levels and a more senior mix of Academic staff (more
Senior and Principal Lecturers and significantly less Hourly Paid Lecturers). Teaching support staff pay costs were
£132,000 lower, the product of having 9.2 fewer staff (FTEs), especially within Administrative Support, partially offset by
6.3% higher average pay levels.
Non-pay costs of £833,000 were £761,000 lower than benchmark and the lowest within the Wider Group. Non-pay
costs were especially low in teaching consumables and teacher training non-pay costs.
Your Student / Staff ratio (SSR) at 25.3 was 0.5% lower than benchmark at 25.5.
The overall contribution from Teaching was £30.2 million, £2.9 million lower than the benchmark. This was a product of
lower income and higher pay costs being partially offset by lower non-pay costs.
Your teaching activity at faculty level was compared against similar faculties/schools elsewhere (please note that
because each faculty is using a different benchmark specific to that faculty, the variance figures will not reconcile to the
overall results detailed above). All of the faculties had higher pay costs and lower non-pay costs mirroring the pattern
shown at university level. Teaching income per student FTE was lower in 3 of the 4 faculties, with the exception of the
Institute of Education and Public Services which generated a higher income per student FTE than its equivalent
benchmark.
This activity was subsidised by £761,000, 21.2% of income, compared to the benchmark subsidy at £2.5 million or
70.1% of income. Looking at costs as a percentage of research and enterprise income, pay costs of £3.7 million were
equivalent to 101.5% of income, compared to 137.8% for the Peer Group, a difference of £1.3 million and the result of
lower staff numbers (33.6 FTEs lower). Non-pay costs of £707,000 accounted for 19.7% of income compared to 32.3%
for the Peer Group, a difference of £454,000.
Library Services (sections 5.5 & 6.7); Total costs of £1.3 million, £385,000 lower than benchmark. Pay costs of £1.0
million were £59,000 higher, staff numbers were 2.3 FTEs higher and overall average pay levels were 2.0% lower.
Non-pay costs of £489,000 were £334,000 lower, including significantly lower costs for books, periodicals and
newspapers. Income from fees and fines of £160,000 was significantly higher than benchmark (£110,000 higher).
IT Services (sections 5.6 & 6.8); Total costs of £2.8 million, £498,000 lower than benchmark. Pay costs of £1.9
million were £76,000 higher, due to higher staff numbers overall (by 6.4 FTEs), offset by 8.4% lower overall average
pay levels. Non-pay costs of £1.1 million were £433,000 lower, including lower costs for computer hardware and
software. Income of £162,000 was £141,000 higher. The IT function was less devolved with 3% of costs within the
faculties compared to benchmark at 7%. The University also had 417 more computers than the comparison (for the
same number of staff and students).
Student Services (sections 5.7 & 6.9); Total costs of £5.0 million, £1.5 million higher than benchmark. Pay costs of
£1.5 million were £456,000 higher, due to higher staff numbers overall (by 12.2 FTEs), with more staff in nearly all
categories. Overall average pay levels were 1.5% higher. Non-pay costs were £1.1 million higher, due to high student
support costs. Please note however that the student support costs include the cost of student fee waivers, which are
not included for the Peer Group, Wider Group or 2010/11 benchmarks (student fee waivers are shown as a reduction of
teaching income as per the Tribal model for all benchmarks)*. If the cost of fee waivers was removed from Student
Services, total non-pay costs would be £0.6 million lower than benchmark, with lower bursary payments the main factor.
The function was less devolved with 2% of costs within the faculties compared to benchmark at 17%.
*The reclassification of student fee waivers was a request from the University of Gloucestershire as it was felt this more
accurately depicted the model of student funding going forward, i.e. current reductions in fees will instead be given as
bursary style payments in the future, which are classified under Student Services in the Tribal model.
Registry (sections 5.8 & 6.10); Total costs of £1.9 million, £447,000 lower than benchmark. Pay costs were £421,000
lower, due to lower staff numbers overall (by 18.0 FTEs), including 9.1 fewer FTEs in Student Records / Data Input
Staff. Overall average pay levels were 14.9% higher. Non-pay costs were in-line and the function was less devolved
with 7% of costs within the faculties compared to benchmark at 27%.
Finance (sections 5.9 & 6.11); Total costs of £1.4 million, £218,000 higher than benchmark. Pay costs of £1.2 million
were £231,000 higher; this was due to higher staff numbers overall (by 8.3 FTEs and the highest in the Wider Group),
including 4.9 more FTEs in Accountancy Staff, partially offset by 6.3% lower overall average pay levels. Non-pay costs
of £186,000 were in-line and income was £42,000 higher. The function was slightly less devolved with 3% of costs
within the faculties compared to benchmark at 4%.
Human Resources & Staff Training (sections 5.10 & 6.12); Total costs of £1.2 million, £10,000 lower than
benchmark. Pay costs of £808,000 were £112,000 higher, due to 12.1% higher overall average pay levels. Overall
staff numbers were in line (0.6 FTEs higher). Non-pay costs of £347,000 were £122,000 lower, including significantly
lower recruitment costs. The function was less devolved with 11% of costs within the faculties compared to benchmark
at 17%.
Marketing (sections 5.11 & 6.13); Total costs of £3.2 million, £770,000 higher than benchmark. Pay costs of £1.6
million were £633,000 higher; due to higher staff numbers (by 14.6 FTEs) including 8.1 more FTEs in the UK/EU
Marketing Staff and 8.7% higher overall average pay levels. Non-pay costs of £1.6 million were in-line, including higher
UK/EU advertising costs and overseas travel costs, offset by lower overseas other costs (mainly overseas agents fees
elsewhere). The function was less devolved with 5% of costs within the faculties compared to benchmark at 14%.
Corporate Administration (sections 5.12 & 6.14); Total costs of £3.0 million, £439,000 higher than benchmark. Pay
costs of £2.1 million were £600,000 higher, due to higher overall staff numbers (by 10.1 FTEs and the highest in the
Wider Group), in particular Planning / Projects Staff (5.5 more FTEs). Overall average pay levels were 7.5% lower.
Non-pay costs of £920,000 were £169,000 lower.
Facilities (sections 5.13 & 6.15); Total costs of £918,000, £46,000 higher than benchmark. Pay costs of £225,000
were £92,000 lower, due to lower staff numbers (by 3.4 FTEs), partially offset by 2.2% higher overall average pay
levels. Non-pay costs of £697,000 were £89,000 higher, including higher post costs. Income of £4,000 was £49,000
lower.
Estates (sections 5.14 & 6.16); Total costs of £4.9 million, £2.1 million lower than benchmark for the same number of
staff and student FTEs. A lower amount of space occupied by the University (10% or 4,541m² less), was coupled by
lower running costs per m² (£1.4 million lower for the same amount of space). Pay costs of £562,000 were £180,000
lower, due to lower staff numbers (by 7.6 FTEs), including 7.8 fewer FTEs in Operatives (caretakers, janitors, porters).
Overall average pay levels were 17.0% higher. Non-pay costs of £4.2 million were £943,000 lower, including lower
long term lease charges and higher security costs.
Support Recommendations:
Review low cost of books and periodicals within Library Services. Would investment improve the student
experience?
Investigate low cost of computer hardware.
Review high numbers of Student Services Staff across several functions, especially Guidance / Support and
Disability Support.
Review low numbers of Registry staff (especially within admissions, student records and examinations). Is
investment needed here or does it suggest efficient systems and processes compared to elsewhere?
Investigate significantly higher number of Finance Staff, especially within Accountancy / Professional Reporting.
Review high numbers of UK/EU Marketing Staff, mainly linked to student recruitment activity.
Higher numbers of staff within Corporate Administration, specifically in Planning / Projects and Policy / Legal /
Strategic, should be reviewed. However the smaller size of the University compared to benchmark should be
taken into account when analysing the magnitude of the variances (i.e. economies of scale).
Overall Estates costs are significantly lower mainly due to the lack of any long term lease charges. However a
low number of Operatives (caretakers / janitors / porters) and low security costs should also be reviewed.
The level of activity in this area was higher than benchmark, with your proportion of income generated being £2.6
million higher, including significantly higher income from Residences and Franchising / Licensing. The overall
contribution was equivalent to 35% of income, compared to the contribution made by the benchmark at 19% of income.
In terms of percentage contribution generated by each component activity, Residences achieved a contribution of £2.2
million compared to the benchmark contribution of £886,000. Catering was subsidised by £19,000 compared to a
£33,000 subsidy elsewhere. Franchising / Licensing achieved a contribution of £2.9 million compared to the benchmark
contribution of £1.3 million.
Overall Conclusions:
Your overall surplus of £4.8 million was slightly lower than the Peer Group, but in-line with the Wider Group. Within
this a higher contribution from Associated Activities was offset by a lower contribution from Principal Activities
compared to the Peer Group.
Based on the same level of principal income, your pay costs were higher than benchmark in academic areas and
support functions, resulting in a lower overall contribution from Principal Activities.
Your teaching contribution was £2.9 million lower given the same number of FTE students. This was primarily due to
significantly lower income levels per student FTE. Higher pay costs (fewer staff, but a more senior mix of
academics) were offset by significantly lower non-pay costs. Further investigation would be recommended to
determine how to increase the income levels and whether investment in non-pay items is warranted.
Compared to the Peer Group, you have a higher percentage of income coming from Research & Enterprise,
however you are delivering this activity at a significantly lower cost (through fewer staff and lower non-pay costs),
meaning your income per research staff FTE is significantly greater than the benchmark.
As a percentage of principal income, the costs of the ten support functions were £1.8 million higher than benchmark.
However when we look at each function individually (using different comparative measures) the combined difference
to benchmark is £0.4 million lower. This again highlights that your principal income is significantly lower, mainly due
to lower teaching income.
The support functions where costs are significantly lower than benchmark are as follows and should be investigated
to determine if they are simply being run efficiently, or if further investment would be desirable to enhance the
support being delivered:
Library newspapers / periodicals non-pay costs.
IT Services computer hardware
Registry staff.
Estates running costs.
The support functions where costs are significantly higher than benchmark are as follows and should be investigated
to determine if a) these costs are acceptable given the service being provided, or b) there is room for cost
efficiencies to be made:
Student Services Staff, especially Guidance / Support Staff and Disability Support Staff.
Financial Accounting Staff.
UK/EU Marketing Staff.
Corporate Administrative Staff.
Within Associated Activities, you had a higher volume of Residences income with a greater contribution level
compared to benchmark, which is mainly due to a greater proportion of owned residences versus leased residences
compared against the Peer Group. Greater proportion of income was also generated through Franchising / Licensing
with a greater contribution level. Although less income is being delivered from Catering, the percentage contribution
was also higher than the benchmark.
A more detailed account of the changes since your last analysis (2010/11) can be found in section 5, however the
key message is that income has reduced by 4% (due to a reduction in student numbers), however the combined
support function costs have increased by 20%.
This section shows the main University figures in more detail against the Peer Group benchmark, Wider Group
benchmark and the University’s 2010/11 results.
Please note that the University activities were identified and grouped according to Tribal’s standard definitions and
these groupings may not necessarily correlate directly with your own organisational structure.
Please also note that Tribal’s methodology uses various measures of activity to convert financial data into meaningful
indicators for comparative purposes. The measure used for each functional area is clearly stated within each section.
The following section contains the comparative data tables for the University of Gloucestershire. For each table we
show the University’s actual value and a comparative figure for our chosen comparisons, the Peer Group, the Wider
Group and the University’s 2010/11 results. The final columns show variance from the Peer Group benchmark. Tribal’s
methodology uses various measures of activity to convert financial data into meaningful indicators for comparative
purposes. The measure used for each functional area is stated within each section. In order to make comparisons
visually histograms present the results for each area for all institutions within the Wider Group. On each histogram, your
result is highlighted in blue, the Peer Group is highlighted in pink and your 2010/11 result is highlighted in orange.
The analysis recognises income and expenditure as separate items. Therefore when analysing income, if the University
is above benchmark the variance is shown as positive (or favourable), if the University is below benchmark the variance
is shown as negative (or unfavourable). For analysis of expenditure items, if the University’s expenditure is above
benchmark the variance is shown as negative (unfavourable), if expenditure is below benchmark the variance is shown
as positive (favourable). Analysis of FTE values is treated in the same way as expenditure. For our analysis of your
2
space (m ) a greater amount of space is shown as a positive variance. In some cases, your values are expressed as a
percentage. Variances are expressed as a percentage and are shown as either above benchmark (positive variance) or
below benchmark (negative variance).
This table details the University’s published consolidated accounts. As per our standard methodology, we show certain
income streams as a reduction of cost (i.e. netted off), e.g. exam fee income, sale of teaching materials etc, the value of
which is shown on lines 7 to 9. After these adjustments we show revised accounts on lines 10 to 12.
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Overall Published Accounts
Position
1. Total Income 69,249
8. Costs 1,505
9. Net Position 0
This table details the University's published consolidated accounts. As per our standard methodology, we show certain income streams as a
reduction of cost (i.e. netted off), e.g. exam fee income, sale of teaching materials etc, the value of which is shown on lines 7 to 9. After
these adjustments we show revised accounts on lines 10 to 12.
The University recorded an overall historical cost surplus of £4.8 million. As per our standard methodology, we show
certain income streams as a reduction of cost. In your case we have netted off a total of £1.5 million. After these
adjustments, we show your total income at £67.7 million and total costs at £62.9 million, leaving the historical cost
surplus unchanged at £4.8 million or 7.1% of income. The Peer Group achieved a surplus of 8.2%, equivalent to
£738,000 higher than your surplus.
This table details the breakdown of overall University activity to identify incomparable items, capital & financing and
associated activities, therefore resulting in the identification of the University’s principal activities.
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Incomparable
Principal Activities
Associated Activities
This table details the breakdown of overall University activity to identify non-comparable items, capital and financing and associated
activities, therefore resulting in the identification of the University's principal activities.
Principal Activities include:- Teaching, Research & Enterprise, Library Services, IT Services, Student Services,
Registry, Finance, Human Resources & Staff Training, Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities and Estates.
% Principal Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Principal Activities
Pay Costs
Non-Pay Costs
This table details the breakdown of principal activities by academic and support functions, and into pay and non-pay costs.
Overall your Principal Activities generated income of £52.8 million. Your surplus of £3.99 million or 7.5% of income was
£2.9 million lower than the Peer Group.
Pay costs were £4.3 million higher due to £1.85 million higher Academic Activity pay costs and £2.4 million higher
Support pay costs.
Non-pay costs were £1.4 million lower due to £825,000 lower Academic Activity costs and £598,000 lower Support
costs.
Teaching comprises the activity delivered by the Faculties after separating out research and enterprise activity. It
includes the proportions of the following functions:- Deans, Assistant Deans, Heads of Department, Professors,
Readers, Principal Lecturers, Senior Lecturers, Lecturers, Hourly Paid Lecturers, Agency Lecturers, Instructors,
Acdemic Technicians, Placement Co-ordinators, Administrative Support, Invigilators and Teaching, Learning and
Curriculum Development.
The graph illustrates the overall contribution from Teaching, measured as £ per student FTE, for all institutions within
the Wider Group. Your result is highlighted in blue, the Peer Group is highlighted in pink and your 2010/11 result is in
orange.
Overall your Teaching generated income of £49.2 million or £6,886 per full-time equivalent (FTE) student. Your
contribution of £30.2 million, or 61.4% of income, was £2.9 million lower than the benchmark.
Teaching income was £425 per FTE student lower, equating to a total lower income of £3.0 million. Your income mix
included a lower proportion of overseas student fees and health contracts (of which you have none).
Teaching costs at £2,661 per FTE Student were £91,000 lower overall.
Delivery pay costs were £802,000 higher – 3.4 FTEs lower offset by 6.9% higher average pay levels and a more senior
staffing mix.
Support pay costs were £132,000 lower – 9.2 FTEs lower partially offset by 6.3% higher average pay levels.
Your SSR of 25.3 was lower than the Peer Group at 25.5.
Research and Enterprise Activity includes the research and enterprise proportions of the following functions:-
Deans, Assistant Deans, Heads of Department, Professors, Readers, Principal Lecturers, Senior Lecturers, Lecturers,
Visiting / Hourly Paid Lecturers, Agency / External Lecturers, Instructors, Academic Technicians, Administration
Support, Researchers and Research Assistants.
The graph illustrates the overall contribution from Research & Enterprise activity, measured as a % of income, for all
institutions within the Wider Group. Your result is highlighted in blue, the Peer Group is highlighted in pink and your
2010/11 result is in orange.
Overall Research & Enterprise Activity generated income of £3.6 million and incurred costs of £4.4 million, resulting in a
subsidy of 21.2%. The Peer Group subsidised this activity at 70.1% of income, equivalent to a £1.8 million higher
subsidy.
See supporting tables for Research & Enterprise Activity in Section 5.5 and 6.5.
Support includes the following functions:- Library Services, IT Services, Student Services, Registry, Finance,
Human Resources & Staff Training, Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities and Estates.
The tables detail the variation in pay and non-pay costs and income (£000s) from the Peer Group benchmark. We have
selected the most appropriate measure for each function (e.g. Library Services costs have been measured by on-site
FTE Students, Registry costs by student headcount etc).
Support
Ar ea
Difference (£000s)
Costs
Pay Costs
Library
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
IT
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Student
Services
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Registry
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Finance
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
HR & Staff
Training
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Marketing
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Corporate
Administration
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Facilities
Non-Pay Costs
Pay Costs
Estates
Non-Pay Costs
The Estates costs shown above only refer to the variation of your Estates costs per m² compared to the benchmark.
They do not take into account any rented costs.
The table below details the variation in income (£000s) from the Peer Group.
Support
Ar ea
Difference (£000s)
Inco me
Library
IT
Student Services
Registry
Finance
Support
Areas
HR & Staff Training
Marketing
Corporate Administration
Facilities
Estates
The table below details the variation in staff numbers (FTEs) from the Peer Group – 25.5 FTEs higher.
Support
Ar ea
Difference (FTEs)
FTEs
Library
IT
Student Services
Registry
Finance
Support
Areas
HR & Staff Training
Marketing
Corporate Administration
Facilities
Estates
The table below details the % variation in average pay levels from the Peer Group - generally higher.
Support
Ar ea
Difference (%)
Pay
Levels
Library
IT
Student Services
Registry
Finance
Support
Areas
HR & Staff Training
Marketing
Corporate Administration
Facilities
Estates
Associated Activities includes the following functions:- Catering, Residences, Accommodation Office, Crèche and
Nursery, Shops, Franchising / Licensing, Student Union / Sports, Widening Participation, Intellectual Property / Royalty
Income, Other Funding Council Grants, Lettings and Other Associated Activities.
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Associated Activities
Income
11. Other Funding Council Grants 533 0.8 % 1.3 % 0.8 % 0.8 % -314
14. Other Associated Activities 550 0.8 % 0.9 % 2.0 % 1.6 % -52
Overall your Associated Activities generated an income of £13.5 million and incurred direct costs of £8.8 million hence
you achieved a contribution of £4.7 million. Your level of activity in this area was 19.9% of total income, compared to
16.1% for the Peer Group.
Volume
Your proportion of income generated from Associated Activities was £2.6 million higher, including significantly higher
income from Residences and Franchising / Licensing (your collaborative provision).
Contribution
Your contribution from Associated Activities was £2.6 million higher, including higher percentage contributions from
Residences and Franchising / Licensing.
See supporting tables for Associated Activity in Section 5.15 & 6.17.
In this section we detail the key increase and decreases in income and expenditure over the two year period from your
initial benchmarking exercise on the 2010/11 year to the current 2012/13 results. The results of your previous
benchmarking exercise, on the 2010/11 year, are also shown for information.
Principal Activities
Your contribution from Principal Activities since the 2010/11 year period has reduced, with the 2012/13 year showing a
58.8% decrease in contribution, from £9.7 million to £4.0 million. This reduction in contribution was due to a 3.8%
decrease in income, coupled by a 19.8% increase in Support costs.
The largest movements between 2010/11 and 202/13 are detailed below:-
Teaching
Your Teaching contribution has decreased by 2.5%. This lower contribution level was due to a 2.0% decrease in
income, partially offset by a 0.8% decrease in pay costs and a 9.6% decrease in non-pay costs.
Support
Total support costs have increased by 19.8% from £21.3 million to £25.5 million:
Library Services – 26.2% decrease. Due to the reclassification of some staff from Library Services to IT Services.
IT Services – 44.4% increase. Due to the reclassification of some staff from Library Services to IT Services.
Student Services – 45.5% increase. This is due to the inclusion of student fee waivers (cost), which were categorised
differently in 2010/11 (shown as a reduction of teaching income)*. If fee waiver costs were removed from Student
Services, the remainder would show a small decrease year on year.
Registry – 19.2% increase. However when measured per student headcount, Registry costs have reduced year on
year.
Finance – 5.0% increase.
Human Resources & Staff Training – 15.4% increase. Due to an increase in HR Professional Staff FTEs and staff
training non-pay costs.
Marketing – 20.9% increase. Due to an increase in UK/EU Marketing Staff and non-pay costs.
Corporate Administration – 22.9% increase. Due to an increase in Planning/Projects Staff and non-pay costs
(professional fees and subscriptions).
Facilities – 5.2% decrease.
Estates – 16.6% increase. Due to an increase in repairs and maintenance costs.
Associated Activities
The total contribution from Associated Activities has increased by 9.6%, with an increase in income offsetting an
increase in costs. The largest increases in income were in Catering and Franchising / Licensing.
*The reclassification of student fee waivers was a request from the University of Gloucestershire as it was felt this more
accurately depicted the model of student funding going forward, i.e. current reductions in fees will instead be given as
bursary style payments in the future, which are classified under Student Services in the Tribal model.
Principal Activities
Pay Costs
Non-Pay Costs
This table details the breakdown of principal activities by academic and support functions, and into pay and non-pay costs.
Teaching Contribution
Supporting Data
Contribution Analysis
Support Costs
This table details the total Support Costs, measured as a percentage of Principal Income.
This table details the overall costs of Library Services, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
IT Services Costs
This table details the overall costs of IT Services, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
This table details the overall Student Services costs, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
Registry Costs
This table details the overall Registry costs, measured by student headcount.
Finance Costs
This table details the overall Finance costs, measured by total income.
Section 5.10 Year on Year Analysis: Human Resources & Staff Training
5. Income 0 0 -18.5 %
This table details the overall Human Resources & Staff Training costs, measured by staff FTE.
Marketing Costs
This table details the overall Marketing costs, measured by total income.
This table details the overall Corporate Administration costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff.
Facilities Costs
5. Income -5 -4 -19.8 %
This table details the overall Facilities costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Your Actual
Estates Costs
Estates Space
3. Total Space (m² per 100 Staff & On-
479.2 506.3 -5.7 %
site Student FTE)
This table details the overall costs of Estates, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Associated Activities
Income
7. Shops 0 0 0.0 %
This section shows the main University figures in more detail against the Peer Group and Wider Group benchmarks and
the University’s 2010/11 results.
Please note that the University activities were identified and grouped according to Tribal’s standard definitions and
these groupings may not necessarily correlate directly with your own organisational structure.
The following section contains the comparative data tables for the University of Gloucestershire. For each table we show
the University’s actual value and a comparative figure for our chosen comparisons, the Peer Group, the Wider Group
and the University’s 2010/11 results. The final columns show variance from the Peer Group benchmark. Tribal’s
methodology uses various measures of activity to convert financial data into meaningful indicators for comparative
purposes. The measure used for each functional area is stated within each section. In order to make comparisons
visually, histograms present the results for each area for all institutions within the Wider Group. On each histogram, your
result is highlighted in blue, the Peer Group is highlighted in pink and your 2010/11 result is highlighted in orange.
The analysis recognises income and expenditure as separate items. Therefore when analysing income, if the University
is above benchmark the variance is shown as positive (or favourable), if the University is below benchmark the variance
is shown as negative (or unfavourable). For analysis of expenditure items, if the University’s expenditure is above
benchmark the variance is shown as negative (unfavourable), if expenditure is below benchmark the variance is shown
as positive (favourable). Analysis of FTE values is treated in the same way as expenditure. For our analysis of your
2
space (m ) a greater amount of space is shown as a positive variance. In some cases, your values are expressed as a
percentage. Variances are expressed as a percentage and are shown as either above benchmark (positive variance) or
below benchmark (negative variance).
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
7. Income 1,505
8. Costs 1,505
9. Net Position 0
12. Historical Cost Surplus / (Deficit) 4,805 7.1 % 8.2 % 7.2 % 9.5 % -738
This table details the University's published consolidated accounts. As per our standard methodology, we show certain income streams as a
reduction of cost (i.e. netted off), e.g. exam fee income, sale of teaching materials etc, the value of which is shown on lines 7 to 9. After these
adjustments we show revised accounts on lines 10 to 12.
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Incomparable
6. Release from Revaluation Reserve 1,616 2.4 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 2.1 % 1,532
Principal Activities
Associated Activities
This table details the breakdown of overall University activity to identify non-comparable items, capital and financing and associated activities,
therefore resulting in the identification of the University's principal activities.
Principal Activities include:- Teaching, Research & Enterprise activity, Library Services, IT Services, Student Services, Registry, Finance, Human
Resources & Staff Training, Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities and Estates.
% Principal Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Principal Activities
Supporting Data
% Principal Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Principal Activities
Pay Costs
Non-Pay Costs
This table details the breakdown of principal activities by academic and support functions, and into pay and non-pay costs.
Teaching comprises the activity delivered by the Faculties after separating out Research and Enterprise activity. It includes the
proportions of the following functions:- Deans, Assistant Deans, Heads of Department, Professors, Readers, Principal Lecturers, Senior Lecturers,
Lecturers, Hourly Paid Lecturers, Agency Lecturers, Instructors, Academic Technicians, Placement Co-ordinators, Administrative Support, Invigilators
and Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Development.
% Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Teaching Income
1. Teaching Income (% of Total
49,229 93.2 % 95.2 % 90.4 % 91.5 % -1,050
Principal Income)
Teaching Contribution
£/FTE Student
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Teaching Contribution
Supporting Data
6. Teaching Income per Delivery Staff
49,229 174 186 196 173 -6.1 %
FTE (£000s)
7. Overall FTE Student / Staff Ratio 7,149 25.3 25.5 25.8 26.0 -0.5 %
10. Student FTE in Price group C 68.3 % 66.9 % 58.8 % 67.2 % 1.4 %
11. Student FTE in Price group D 29.8 % 26.7 % 30.1 % 31.8 % 3.1 %
This table details the teaching contribution, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) students.
% Teaching Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Teaching Income (£ per FTE Student) 49,229 6,886 7,311 7,630 6,664 -3,040
2. Grants & Home / EU Fees 46,077 93.6 % 77.3 % 73.9 % 90.6 % 8,030
This table details the teaching income, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) students.
£/FTE Student
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total Teaching Pay Costs 18,188 2,544 2,450 2,604 2,432 -670
7. Hourly Paid / Agency Lecturers 977 137 238 226 142 727
9. Total Delivery Pay Costs 14,675 2,053 1,940 2,024 1,925 -802
10. School / Faculty Management 995 139 175 172 143 257
16. Total Teaching Support Pay Costs 3,513 491 510 580 507 132
Supporting Data
This table details the teaching staff pay costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) students.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Teaching Staff Numbers 370.3 518.0 535.6 540.1 513.8 12.6
2. Heads / Deans / Asst. Deans 1.1 1.5 4.0 2.2 4.0 1.8
7. Hourly Paid / Agency Lecturers 22.3 31.1 79.7 67.5 38.9 34.7
9. Total Delivery Staff Numbers 282.3 394.9 399.6 393.5 385.0 3.4
10. School / Faculty Management 12.3 17.1 23.5 21.1 18.4 4.5
This table details the teaching staff numbers, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) students.
% FTE Mix
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Heads / Deans / Asst. Deans 1.1 0.4 % 1.0 % 0.6 % 1.0 % 1.8
6. Hourly Paid / Agency Lecturers 22.3 7.9 % 19.6 % 16.8 % 10.1 % 33.1
1. Overall Teaching Average Pay Level 49,111 45,805 48,250 47,332 -7.2 %
9. Delivery Staff Average Pay Level 51,985 48,635 51,443 49,998 -6.9 %
This table details the teaching staff average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
£/FTE Student
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total Teaching Non-Pay Costs 833 116 223 217 122 761
10. Total Teaching Non-Pay Costs 833 116 223 217 122 761
Supporting Data
This table details the teaching non-pay costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) students.
Research & Enterprise activity includes the research and enterprise proportions of the following functions:- Deans, Assistant Deans, Heads
of Department, Professors, Readers, Principal Lecturers, Senior Lecturers, Lecturers, Visiting / Hourly Paid Lecturers, Agency / External Lecturers,
Instructors, Academic Technicians, Administration Support, Researchers and Research Assistants. Together with direct non-pay costs associated with
this activity.
% Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Contribution Analysis
Supporting Data
11. Research & Enterprise Income / Direct
3,596 83 70 71 86 554
Staff FTE (£000's) *
* Direct Staff includes researchers and commercial staff.
Ratio
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
This table details the research and enterprise activity pay costs.
Support includes the following functions:- Library Services, IT Services, Student Services, Registry, Finance, Human Resources & Staff Training,
Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities and Estates.
% Principal Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Support Costs
This table details the total Support Costs, measured as a percentage of Principal Income.
Ratio
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Support Costs (% Principal Income) 25,460 48.2 % 44.7 % 42.5 % 38.7 % -1,849
Support Costs
2. Library Services (£/On-Site FTE
1,349 186 239 252 246 385
Student)
3. IT Services (£/Staff & Student FTE) 2,796 340 400 432 227 498
4. Student Services (£/On-Site FTE
4,952 684 470 436 458 -1,546
Student)
5. Registry (£/Student Headcount) 1,886 144 178 201 146 447
6. Finance (£/£10,000 Total Income) 1,359 201 169 177 190 -218
7. HR & Staff Training (£/Staff FTE) 1,155 1,347 1,358 1,334 1,110 10
8. Marketing (£/£10,000 Total Income) 3,196 482 366 429 394 -770
9. Corporate Admin. (£/Staff FTE) 2,995 3,943 3,364 2,853 3,111 -439
10. Facilities (£/Staff & Student FTE) 918 112 106 101 113 -46
11. Estates (£/Staff & On-Site Student
4,855 607 871 830 507 2,117
FTE)
Library Services includes the following functions:- Library Services Management, Middle Management / Librarians, Senior Information / Resource
Assistants, Information / Resource Assistants, Administration and Shelvers. And non-pay costs of: Books, Magazines, Periodicals Electronic Media
and Library Consumables.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total Library Services Costs 1,349 186 239 252 246 385
Supporting Data
This table details the overall costs of Library Services, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Library Services Staff Numbers 32.6 45.0 41.9 43.0 74.5 -2.3
Supporting Data
This table details the staffing levels within Library Services, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
This table details the Library Services average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
2. Books 63 9 27 26 32 136
4. Equipment / Consumables 16 2 9 5 3 49
Supporting Data
This table details the Library Services non-pay costs, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
IT Services includes the following functions:- IT Services Management, Business Information Support, Network / Infrastructure Support, Client /
Workstation Support, Audio Visual Technicians and Non-Technical Administration. And non-pay costs of: Computer Hardware, Computer Software,
Maintenance, Licences Agreements, Telephones and Consumables.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
IT Services Costs
Supporting Data
10. Capitalisation Threshold (Equipment)
5 4 11 5 -1
(£000s)
11. Staff & Student FTE 8,231 10,349 16,309 8,545 -2,118
This table details the overall costs of IT Services, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total IT Services Staff Numbers 51.6 62.7 55.0 55.4 42.4 -6.4
12. % Staff outside Central Department(s) 0.7 1.3 % 2.7 % 5.9 % 8.3 % -1.5 %
13. Staff & Student FTE 8,231 10,349 16,309 8,545 -2,118
This table details the staffing levels within IT Services, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
This table details the IT Services average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
5. Computer Consumables 42 5 10 13 5 38
7. Telephones 222 27 28 25 14 12
Supporting Data
10. % Non-Pay Costs outside Central
57 5.3 % 11.7 % 15.8 % 9.0 % -68
Department(s)
11. IT Equipment Depreciation (net) 1,014 123 94 66 107 -244
12. Capitalisation Threshold (Equipment)
5 4 11 5
(£000's)
Supporting Data - Staff & Student FTE
13. Staff & Student FTE 8,231 10,349 16,309 8,545 -2,118
This table details the IT Services non-pay costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Student Services includes the following functions:- Student Services Management, Careers Service, Counselling, Guidance / Support, Disability
Support, Chaplaincy and Medical Staff. And non-pay costs of: Student Bursaries, Student Welfare, and Careers Library.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total Student Services Costs 4,952 684 470 436 458 -1,546
Costs Analysis
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Student Services costs, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Student Services Staff Numbers 42.3 58.4 41.6 43.7 57.3 -12.2
7. Chaplaincy, Medical & Other 2.4 3.3 2.3 1.9 4.6 -0.7
Supporting Data
10. % Staff outside Central
0.1 0.3 % 5.1 % 8.2 % 1.9 % -2.0
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Student FTE
This table details the staffing levels within Student Services, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
This table details the Student Services average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Supporting Data
6. % Non-Pay Costs outside Central
99 2.8 % 27.2 % 34.2 % 9.1 % -871
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Student FTE
This table details the Student Services non-pay costs, measured by on-site full time equivalent (FTE) students.
Registry includes the following functions:- Registry Management, Admissions, Student Records, Data Inputting, Quality, Management Information,
Examinations, Graduation and Awards, Timetabling and External Examiners. And non-pay costs of: UCAS Capitation Fee, External Examiners,
Validation and Graduation.
£/Student Headcount
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Registry Costs
5. Income -12 -1 -1 -1 0 4
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Registry costs, measured by student headcount.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Registry Staff Numbers 44.0 33.7 47.4 53.3 36.1 18.0
6. Student Records / Data Input 7.4 5.7 12.6 14.7 8.3 9.1
Supporting Data
12. % Staff outside Central Department(s) 2.4 5.4 % 30.0 % 34.1 % 10.6 % -10.9
This table details the staffing levels within Registry, measured by student headcount.
1. Overall Registry Average Pay Level 39,670 34,519 34,843 37,497 -14.9 %
11. Overall Average Pay Level 39,670 34,519 34,843 37,497 -14.9 %
This table details the Registry average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
£/Student Headcount
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
5. Total 163 12 14 17 12 16
7. Total 152 12 13 16 11 23
Supporting Data
11. % Non-Pay Costs outside Central
-11 -6.8 % 9.6 % 35.6 % 0.7 % -16.4 %
Department(s) *
12. Student Headcount 13,076 15,472 21,685 10,804 -2,396
This table details the Registry non-pay costs, measured by student headcount.
Finance includes the following functions:- Finance Management, Accountancy, Professional Reporting, Purchasing (including Purchase Ledger),
Payroll and Credit Control (including Sales Ledger). And non-pay costs of: Bank Charges, Payroll Charges, Audit Fee’s and Financial Advice.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Finance Costs
Costs Analysis
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Finance costs, measured by total income.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Finance Staff Numbers 34.2 50.6 38.3 39.1 47.2 -8.3
4. Purchasing (inc Purchase Ledger) 8.4 12.4 9.5 10.5 8.8 -2.0
6. Credit Control (inc Sales Ledger) 9.5 14.0 10.7 9.4 10.9 -2.3
Supporting Data
9. % Staff outside Central
1.3 3.8 % 4.5 % 9.7 % 0.8 % -0.2
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Income
This table details the staffing levels within Finance, measured by total income.
1. Overall Finance Average Pay Level 35,949 38,372 38,812 36,921 6.3 %
6. Credit Control (inc Sales Ledger) 29,316 31,764 31,366 26,236 7.7 %
This table details the Finance average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
6. Bank Charges 54 8 8 11 8 -2
Supporting Data
This table details the Finance non-pay costs, measured by total income.
Human Resources & Staff Training includes the following functions:- HR Management, HR Professionals, Staff Welfare, Staff Training /
Development and HR Administration / Systems. And non-pay costs of: Occupational Health and Staff Training.
£/Staff FTE
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total HR & Staff Training Costs 1,155 1,347 1,358 1,334 1,110 10
5. Income 0 0 0 -8 0 0
Costs Analysis
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Human Resources & Staff Training costs, measured by staff FTE.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
Supporting Data
9. % Staff outside Central
0.0 0.0 % 4.5 % 5.2 % 0.3 % -0.8
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Staff FTE
This table details the staffing levels within Human Resources & Staff Training, measured by staff FTE.
This table details the Human Resources & Staff Training average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
£/Staff FTE
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Total HR & Staff Training Non-Pay
Costs
1. Total HR & Staff Training Non-Pay
347 404 546 521 380 122
Costs
HR & Staff Training Non-Pay Costs
4. Other Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Supporting Data
8. % Non-Pay Costs outside Central
127 36.6 % 36.2 % 41.7 % 36.3 % 1
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Staff FTE
This table details the Human Resources & Staff Training non-pay costs, measured by staff FTE.
Marketing includes the following functions:- Marketing Management, UK and European Marketing, Overseas Marketing, Corporate Web and
Graphic Design, Press Office / PR / Communications, Alumni, Fundraising and Student Ambassadors. And non-pay costs of: Publicity, Brochure,
Marketing Travel, Overseas Agents and Other Promotional Costs.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Marketing Costs
5. Income -3 -1 -2 -1 -6 -7
Costs Analysis
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Marketing costs, measured by total income.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Marketing Staff Numbers 43.4 65.5 43.4 51.6 57.1 -14.6
5. Corporate Web / Graphic Design 4.3 6.5 8.0 7.6 8.4 1.0
Supporting Data
10. % Staff outside Central
1.6 3.7 % 11.3 % 20.9 % 3.6 % -3.3
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Income
This table details the staffing levels within Marketing, measured by total income.
1. Overall Marketing Average Pay Level 37,594 34,575 36,896 35,729 -8.7 %
This table details the Marketing average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total Marketing Non-Pay Costs 1,568 236 217 240 196 -129
2. Materials 244 37 38 40 21 6
4. Travel 21 3 3 4 3 -1
7. Materials 15 2 7 8 0 32
8. Advertising 45 7 2 7 9 -33
Supporting Data
12. % Non-Pay Costs outside Central
40 2.5 % 17.4 % 21.4 % 14.4 % -232
Department(s)
Supporting Data - Income
This table details the Marketing non-pay costs, measured by total income.
Corporate Administration includes the following functions:- Senior Management, Policy, Legal, Clerk to the Board, Strategic Planning, Projects,
Senior Secretarial Personal Assistants. And non-pay costs of: Hospitality, Non-Property insurance, Legal and Consultancy Costs, Corporate
Subscriptions, Staff travel and General Equipment.
£/Staff FTE
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
1. Total Corporate Administration Costs 2,995 3,943 3,364 2,853 3,111 -439
5. Income 3 4 -7 -6 -26 -8
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Corporate Administration costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
Supporting Data
This table details the staffing levels within Corporate Administration, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff.
This table details the Corporate Administration average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
£/Staff FTE
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
9. Other Costs 18 23 68 37 0 34
Supporting Data
This table details the Corporate Administration non-pay costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff.
Facilities includes the following functions:- Printroom, Reception, Switchboard and Post Room. And non-pay costs of: Printing, Stationary, Post
and Transport including Inter-Site Bus.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Facilities Costs
Supporting Data
This table details the overall Facilities costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Facilities Staff Numbers 8.6 10.4 14.5 13.1 16.8 3.4
Supporting Data
This table details the staffing levels within Facilities, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
1. Overall Facilities Average Pay Level 26,196 25,622 26,748 27,435 -2.2 %
This table details the Facilities average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Supporting Data
This table details the Facilities non-pay costs, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Estates includes the following functions:- Estates Management, Specialist Staff (Surveyors, Health and Safety), all Premises related
Administration, Maintenance (Plumbers, Electricians), Operatives, Groundsmen, Gardeners, Security, Car Park and Cleaning (excluding Residences).
And non-pay costs of: Utilities, Grounds, Repairs & Maintenance, Property Insurance, Property Related Consultancy and Cleaning (excluding
Residences).
Ratio
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
4. Staff & On-site Student FTE 8,003 9,754 15,883 8,210 -1,752
This table details the overall costs of Estates, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual m² 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (m² (000s))
Ratio Group Group
(000s)
7. Total Teaching & Research 12.2 151.8 177.5 232.7 128.2 2.1
Indirect Space
9. Sports Hall / Function Halls 0.9 11.8 28.0 20.3 13.0 1.3
13. Prep Rooms / Toilets / Stores 1.9 23.5 70.8 67.2 47.2 3.8
14. Public Space / Corridors 9.6 119.8 118.1 148.1 108.4 -0.1
16. General Teaching Rooms 7.9 66.7 48.7 57.7 83.3 -37.0 %
18. Teaching Labs / Workshops 1.8 40.4 53.4 56.6 49.8 24.4 %
20. Overall Average Teaching Room 11.9 56.6 51.7 55.7 78.0 -9.5 %
Supporting Data
21. Staff & On-site Student FTE 8,003 9,754 15,883 8,210 -1,752
This table details the overall Estates space, measured by full time equivalent (FTE) staff and students.
£/m²
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Estates Costs
2. Owned & Permanently Leased 4,786 118 146 131 106 1,124
Supporting Data
This table details the overall costs of owned Estates, measured by owned square metres.
FTEs/100,000 Owned m²
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (FTEs)
Ratio Group Group
FTEs
1. Total Estates Staff Numbers 14.0 34.5 53.3 50.9 44.7 7.6
Supporting Data
This table details the staffing levels within Estates, measured by owned square metres.
1. Overall Estates Average Pay Level 40,129 34,313 36,283 37,550 -17.0 %
This table details the Estates average pay levels (inclusive of NI and pensions).
£/Owned m²
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
14. Long Term Lease Charges 0 0.00 18.12 10.60 0.00 734
Supporting Data
16. Depreciation & Lease Costs 2,682 66.19 55.48 57.89 58.87 -434
17. Release from Revaluation Reserve
-1,616 -39.88 -2.42 -5.95 -35.76 1,518
(Buildings)
18. Release of Capital Grants -538 -13.27 -14.57 -14.51 -12.47 -53
* To facilitate comparisons of services which may be contracted out we have included pay costs where applicable.
This table details the non-pay costs of owned Estates, measured by owned square metres.
Associated Activities include:- Catering, Residences, Accommodation Office, Crèche and Nursery, Shops, Franchising / Licensing, Student Union /
Sports, Widening Participation, Other Funding Council Grants, Lettings, Donations and Other Associated Activities.
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Associated Activities
Income
5. Residences (inc. Accommodation office) 5,704 8.4 % 5.4 % 4.6 % 7.8 % 2,052
11. Other Funding Council Grants 533 0.8 % 1.3 % 0.8 % 0.8 % -314
14. Other Associated Activities 550 0.8 % 0.9 % 2.0 % 1.6 % -52
% Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
Catering
Crèche / Nursery
Shops
Franchising / Licensing
Capital & Financing includes:- Depreciation, Capital Grant releases, Interest Income, Release from Revaluation Reserve, Debt Servicing Charges
and Bad Debts.
% Total Income
Your
Your Peer Wider
Actual 2010/11 Variance from Peer Group (£000s)
Ratio Group Group
£000s
3. Release from Revaluation Reserve 1,616 2.4 % 0.1 % 0.4 % 2.1 % 1,532
Income
Costs
This table details the capital and financing items that are excluded from our main analysis. The actual values and the elements within each line
are predominately unique to each university as they are dependent on corporate strategies on estates, investments, borrowings etc. We therefore
make no comparative judgement on them.
In this section the overall analysis of your academic activities (teaching, research and other enterprise activities) is
broken down across your individual faculties. This provides an internal comparison of the faculties against each other.
We then also provide, where possible, an external comparison for each faculty.
As per our standard methodology, the analysis of the faculties includes all income, costs and staff involved in teaching,
research and enterprise activities, and excludes all other activities that may be undertaken within a particular faculty but
which are primarily regarded as an overhead or support function (e.g. registry, marketing, etc). This then enables us to
provide a realistic comparable benchmark analysis, regardless of the level of devolvement within individual institutions.
The external faculty benchmarks are chosen by reference to student activity within HESA academic cost centres, to give
more relevant benchmarks for each individual faculty. This approach results in much smaller groups of comparator
institutions, with different groups for each faculty Due to these different comparison groups at faculty level, and the fact
that some faculties in some institutions may have no suitable comparators at all, it is NOT possible to reconcile the
overall institutional results for teaching and research activities with the aggregate results for the individual faculty.
An analysis has been provided for the following faculties (please note the Institute has been separated out from BEPS):
• Applied Sciences
• Business
• Institute of Education & Public Services
• Media, Art & Technology
The graph illustrates the overall contribution (academic related income less academic related costs divided by academic related
income) of each faculty
Contribution %
Contribution %
Income £000s
Income £000s
Income £000s
Contribution
Contribution
Contribution
Cost £000s
Cost £000s
Cost £000s
Contribution by
£000s
£000s
£000s
faculty
1. Overall 52,826 23,097 29,729 56.3 % 49,229 18,740 30,490 61.9 % 3,596 4,357 -761 -21.2 %
2. Applied Sciences 16,232 6,912 9,320 57.4 % 15,781 5,994 9,788 62.0 % 450 918 -468 -103.8 %
3. Business 9,008 3,944 5,064 56.2 % 7,801 3,207 4,594 58.9 % 1,207 736 471 39.0 %
4. Institute of Education &
9,867 3,314 6,553 66.4 % 9,780 3,193 6,587 67.4 % 87 121 -34 -39.4 %
Public Services
5. Media, Arts & Technology 15,705 6,354 9,351 59.5 % 14,991 5,652 9,339 62.3 % 714 702 13 1.8 %
6. Non School 2,014 2,573 -560 -27.8 % 876 694 183 20.8 % 1,137 1,880 -743 -65.3 %
Your
Actual Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (£000s)
£000s
x
Volume of Activity
Contribution
Income Mix
This table details the size, contribution and income mix of the faculty.
Your
Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (Actuals)
Actual
x
6. Funding Council Grants & Home / EU Fees 15,441 97.8 % 82.8 % 2,373
16. Teaching Support Staff Average Pay Level 42,774 37,371 -14.5 %
x
Supporting Data
17. Overall FTE Student / Staff Ratio 2,298 24.7 26.8 -193
18. Teaching Income per Delivery Staff FTE (£000s) 15,781 170 207 -3,443
This table details the teaching income, costs and staffing levels of the faculty per FTE student.
Your
Actual Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (£000s)
£000s
x
Volume of Activity
Contribution
Income Mix
This table details the size, contribution and income mix of the faculty.
Your
Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (Actuals)
Actual
x
6. Funding Council Grants & Home / EU Fees 6,254 80.2 % 73.0 % 559
16. Teaching Support Staff Average Pay Level 38,018 39,844 4.6 %
x
Supporting Data
17. Overall FTE Student / Staff Ratio 1,216 25.9 34.1 -382
18. Teaching Income per Delivery Staff FTE (£000s) 7,801 166 233 -3,122
This table details the teaching income, costs and staffing levels of the faculty per FTE student.
Your
Actual Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (£000s)
£000s
x
Volume of Activity
Contribution
Income Mix
This table details the size, contribution and income mix of the faculty.
7.2.6. Institute of Education & Public Services: Teaching Income & Costs
Your
Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (Actuals)
Actual
x
6. Funding Council Grants & Home / EU Fees 8,515 87.1 % 54.5 % 3,183
16. Teaching Support Staff Average Pay Level 35,418 35,775 1.0 %
x
Supporting Data
17. Overall FTE Student / Staff Ratio 1,157 24.6 26.4 -83
18. Teaching Income per Delivery Staff FTE (£000s) 9,780 208 190 859
This table details the teaching income, costs and staffing levels of the faculty per FTE student.
Your
Actual Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (£000s)
£000s
x
Volume of Activity
Contribution
Income Mix
This table details the size, contribution and income mix of the faculty.
Your
Your Ratio Benchmark Variance from Benchmark (Actuals)
Actual
x
6. Funding Council Grants & Home / EU Fees 14,467 96.5 % 90.5 % 905
16. Teaching Support Staff Average Pay Level 39,099 37,796 -3.4 %
x
Supporting Data
17. Overall FTE Student / Staff Ratio 2,086 24.2 26.1 -164
18. Teaching Income per Delivery Staff FTE (£000s) 14,991 174 196 -1,898
This table details the teaching income, costs and staffing levels of the faculty per FTE student.
Section 8 Glossary
Section 8 Glossary
Associated Activities include:- Catering, Residences, Accommodation Office, Crèche and Nursery, Shops, Franchising / Licensing, Student Union /
Sports, Widening Participation, Other Funding Council Grants, Lettings, Donations and Other Associated Activities.
Capital & Financing includes:- Depreciation, Capital Grant releases, Interest Income, Release from Revaluation Reserve, Debt Servicing Charges
and Bad Debts.
Corporate Administration includes the following functions:- Senior Management, Policy, Legal, Clerk to the Board, Strategic Planning, Projects,
Senior Secretarial Personal Assistants. And non-pay costs of: Hospitality, Non-Property insurance, Legal and Consultancy Costs, Corporate
Subscriptions, Staff travel and General Equipment.
Estates includes the following functions:- Estates Management, Specialist Staff (Surveyors, Health and Safety), all Premises related
Administration, Maintenance (Plumbers, Electricians), Operatives, Groundsmen, Gardeners, Security, Car Park and Cleaning (excluding Residences).
And non-pay costs of: Utilities, Grounds, Repairs & Maintenance, Property Insurance, Property Related Consultancy and Cleaning (excluding
Residences).
Facilities includes the following functions:- Printroom, Reception, Switchboard and Post Room. And non-pay costs of: Printing, Stationary, Post
and Transport including Inter-Site Bus.
Finance includes the following functions:- Finance Management, Accountancy, Professional Reporting, Purchasing (including Purchase Ledger),
Payroll and Credit Control (including Sales Ledger). And non-pay costs of: Bank Charges, Payroll Charges, Audit Fee’s and Financial Advice.
Human Resources & Staff Training includes the following functions:- HR Management, HR Professionals, Staff Welfare, Staff Training /
Development and HR Administration / Systems. And non-pay costs of: Occupational Health and Staff Training.
IT Services includes the following functions:- IT Services Management, Business Information Support, Network / Infrastructure Support, Client /
Workstation Support, Audio Visual Technicians and Non-Technical Administration. And non-pay costs of: Computer Hardware, Computer Software,
Maintenance, Licences Agreements, Telephones and Consumables.
Library Services includes the following functions:- Library Services Management, Middle Management / Librarians, Senior Information / Resource
Assistants, Information / Resource Assistants, Administration and Shelvers. And non-pay costs of: Books, Magazines, Periodicals Electronic Media
and Library Consumables.
Marketing includes the following functions:- Marketing Management, UK and European Marketing, Overseas Marketing, Corporate Web and
Graphic Design, Press Office / PR / Communications, Alumni, Fundraising and Student Ambassadors. And non-pay costs of: Publicity, Brochure,
Marketing Travel, Overseas Agents and Other Promotional Costs.
Principal Activities include:- Teaching, Research & Enterprise activity, Library Services, IT Services, Student Services, Registry, Finance, Human
Resources & Staff Training, Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities and Estates.
Registry includes the following functions:- Registry Management, Admissions, Student Records, Data Inputting, Quality, Management Information,
Examinations, Graduation and Awards, Timetabling and External Examiners. And non-pay costs of: UCAS Capitation Fee, External Examiners,
Validation and Graduation.
Research & Enterprise activity includes the research and enterprise proportions of the following functions:- Deans, Assistant Deans, Heads
of Department, Professors, Readers, Principal Lecturers, Senior Lecturers, Lecturers, Visiting / Hourly Paid Lecturers, Agency / External Lecturers,
Instructors, Academic Technicians, Administration Support, Researchers and Research Assistants. Together with direct non-pay costs associated with
this activity.
Student Services includes the following functions:- Student Services Management, Careers Service, Counselling, Guidance / Support, Disability
Support, Chaplaincy and Medical Staff. And non-pay costs of: Student Bursaries, Student Welfare, and Careers Library.
Support includes the following functions:- Library Services, IT Services, Student Services, Registry, Finance, Human Resources & Staff Training,
Marketing, Corporate Administration, Facilities and Estates.
Teaching comprises the activity delivered by the Faculties after separating out Research and Enterprise activity. It includes the
proportions of the following functions:- Deans, Assistant Deans, Heads of Department, Professors, Readers, Principal Lecturers, Senior Lecturers,
Lecturers, Hourly Paid Lecturers, Agency Lecturers, Instructors, Academic Technicians, Placement Co-ordinators, Administrative Support, Invigilators
and Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Development.
For further information regarding Tribal and the benchmarking process or any of our other products, please contact our
managing consultant Nick Pidgeon:
Email: nick.pidgeon@tribalgroup.com
Website: www.tribalgroup.com