Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

carried over to the succeeding

months/quarter
(d) both the administrative and judicial
Tax Refund and Credit claims for refund or credit were filed
within the two year prescriptive period.
Tax refund
It is the return by the government of Who may claim for refund or tax credit?
excess taxes paid by a taxpayer. The refund is A VAT registered person whose sales of
also made in money. goods, properties or services are zero-rated or
effectively zero-rated may apply for the
Tax Credit issuance of a TCC or refund of input tax
The VAT-registered taxpayer is allowed attributable to such sales.
to credit his excess input taxes against his direct
internal revenue tax liability. The VAT- GENERAL RULE:
registered taxpayer is issued a tax credit
certificate to be used for such purpose.  The VAT registered taxpayer may
only apply for TAX CREDIT
A person is entitled to a VAT refund or credit  UNLESS
when
 Exception: He shall be entitled for a
refund if he has no internal revenue
(a) claimed input tax payments are duly
supported by VAT invoices and or tax liabilities against which the tax
receipts credit certificate may be utilized
(b) claimed input taxes are directly
attributable to zero-rated sales Period to file/manner of giving refund

Sitel Phils vs. CIR G.R no. 201326, A VAT registered taxpayer must file the
february 8, 2017 claim within 2 years from

In a claim for tax refund or tax credit,


the applicant must prove not only
entitlement to the grant of the claim Attributable to Reckoning Date
under substantive law, Zero-rated or Close of taxable
effectively zero rated quarter when the
sales sales were made
He must also show satisfaction of all the
Cancellation of VAT Cancellation of VAT
documentary and evidentiary registration Registration
requirements for an administrative
claim for a refund or tax credit and Refund or tax credit of Excess Input Tax
compliance with the invoicing and In proper cases, the Commissioner shall
accounting requirements mandated by grant a refund for creditable input taxes within
NIRC. 90 days from the date of submission of the
official receipts or invoices and other
documents in support of the application filed
with subsections (A) AND (B) of Section 12 of
(c) claimed input taxes payments were
NIRC.
not applied against any output tax nor
Upon the submission of the claim within the sale or exchange of services shall be liable
2 years prescriptive period, the CIR has 90 days to register if,
from the date of submission of complete
documents to decide. 1. His gross sales or receipts from on-
going business for the past 12
The decision of the CIR may either be a: months, have exceeded 3 million
2. There is reasonable ground to
GRANT-CIR decided favorably
DIRECT DENIAL-CIR expressly denies the believe that his gross sales or
claim, receipts in a new business from the
INDIRECT DENIAL-inaction of the CIR next 12 months, will exceed 3
within the 90 day period. million.

When to register as NON –VAT TAXPAYER


In case of full or partial denial of the claim
Every person other than those required
for tax refund
to be registered as VAT persons, engage
The taxpayer affected may, within 30 in any business, shall, on or before the
days from the receipt of the decision denying commencement of his business or
the claim, appeal the decision with the Court of whenever he transfers to another
Tax Appeals (CTA) revenue district should register as a
non-VAT taxpayer.
Failure on the part of any official, agent,
or employee of the BIR to act on the application Purely self employed individual who are
within the 90-day period shall be punishable VAT-registered taxpayers and whose
under 269 of the NIRC. gross sales/receipts and non-operating
income does not exceed the NEW VAT
Enhanced Vat Refund System under R.A THRESHOLD (3 million) may elect to
10963 (train) change his status from VAT-registered
to non VAT registered.
Is intended to grant refunds of
creditable input tax within 90 days from the Filing of returns and declarations
filing of the VAT refund application with the BIR
A taxable person is required to account
All applications filed from January 1, for and pay value added tax by reference to
2018 shall be processed and must be decided each accounting period consisting of three
within 90 days from the filing of the VAT refund months, referred to as a taxable quarter
application. All pending VAT refund claims as of
December 31, 2017 shall be fully paid in cash by A VAT declaration for the month must
December 31, 2019 be filed within 20 days after the end of the
month
Mandatory Registration
A VAT return covering the amount of his
Any person who, in the course of trade gross sales or receipts and purchases for the
or business or profession, sells, barters, or
exchanges goods or properties, or engages in
prescribed taxable quarter must be filed 25 days 2. Prescribes the documents to be
following the close of the quarter attached to a VAT refund/credit docket
and required notice to claimants
Beginning January 1, 2023 the filing and 3. Defines and delineate the duties and
payment shall be done 25 days following the responsibilities of different offices,
close of each taxable quarter (amended by including the time frame to process,
Train) review, approve, and pay the VAT
refund/credit claims.
Payment of Tax

1. VAT must be paid every month Revenue memorandum circular no.


2. Taxable person must submit a monthly 47-2019
VAT declaration form within 20 days
following the end of the month to Provides for guidelines and mandatory
which it relates requirements for the processing and grant of
3. The VAT return for the quarter must be Value-Added Tax (VAT) refund claims within the
filed not later than 25 days after the 90-day period
close of taxable quarter.
The taxpayers-claimants are required to
submit the listed documents within the 30 days
Revenue memorandum Order no.
from the date of filing.
10-2019
1. CERTIFICATE of VAT payment
Grant of Value-added Tax (VAT)
Privileges to Resident Foreign Missions, their 2. Certificate of foreign
Qualified Personnel and the Dependents of the registration/incorporation/association of the
Latter NRFC for purposes of the claims whose zero-
rated sales are anchored
Based on the principle of reciprocity, a
resident foreign mission, its qualified personnel 3. Other Certifications required for
and the latter’s dependent may be accorded tax claims whose zero-rated sales are anchored
exemption on their purchase of goods and/or
services either at point of sale or on refund Revenue Regulation No. 13-2018
basis.
It amended RR No. 16-2005 to include the
amendments instituted under RA 10963.
Revenue Memorandum Order no.
25-2019 Zero rated sales v. Exempted Sale

1. Provides uniform policies and guidelines Zero rated sale


in the processing, verification, approval,
1. Taxable for VAT purposes
and payment of claims for VAT
2. Does not result in output tax
refund/credit, except those under the
3. Input tax is available for tax credit or
jurisdiction of the Legal Service
refund
Exempted sale  If the monthly rent exceeds
PhP15,000.00 but the aggregate is less
1. Not subject to input and output tax than PhP3,000,000.00 it is exempt from
2. No tax refund or tax credit VAT but it is liable for 3% tax under Sec.
Zero rated sales of goods and properties 116 of the NIRC.

 Export sales of registered export traders


shall include their commission income.
 Also for exports to be deemed as export
sales and be subject to 0% VAT it must
first be sold by the consignee.
 The sale of electricity by any entity
including the NCPG shall be liable for
12% VAT.  Mixed Transaction Rule:

VAT-exempt transactions 1.) Separate the monthly rent that exceeds


PhP15,000.00 from those that are equal or less
 Sale of capital assets used in the trade
than PhP15,000.00.
or business of the seller is not exempt
from the imposition of VAT. 2.) Separately compute for the gross aggregate.
 Low cost housing (HUDCC Resolution
No. 2 Series of 2015) which values 3.) Apply the rules
PhP1,700,000.00  Example:

 Socialized housing (Subdivision)HUDCC Cedy rents his 5 commercial and 10


Resolution No. 1 Series of 2018 which residential units for monthly rent of 60,000 and
values: Php15,000 per unit, respectively. During the
22 – 24 sq.m. = PhP480,000.00 taxable year the accumulated gross receipts
24 – 28 sq.m. = PhP530,000.00 during the taxable year amounted to amounted
28 – 32 sq.m. = PhP580,000.00 to Php5,400,000.( 3,600,000 from commercial
units and P1,800,000 from residential units)
 Socialized housing (Condominuim)
HUDCC Resolution No. 2 Series of 2018 Cedy is subject to tax with respect to the
Php3, 600,000 since it exceeded the threshold
which values:
Value: which is Php3,000,000.
 Greater Manila Area: Cedy is not taxable with the Php1,800,000
• 22 sq.m.=PhP700,000.00 from residential units since it does not exceed
• 24 sq.m. =PhP750,000.00 P3,000,000 and the monthly rental does not
 Outside GMA: exceed the Php15,000 monthly rental
• 22 sq.m. =PhP600,000.00 threshold.
• 24 sq.m. =PhP650,000.00
 An individual that availed of the 8% tax
on the gross sales or receipts as long as
it does not exceed 3 million at the end
of the year or at any time within the
year is exempt from VAT.

Where to file tax refund

• BIR Office
• Revenue District Officer having
jurisdiction over the principal place of
business of the taxpayer
• Claims of tax refund of direct exporters
exclusively filed with VAT Credit Audit
Division

Tax on persons EXEMPT from Value added TAX

Any person whose sales or receipts are


exempt under section 109 (1) (bb) of the tax
code from the payment of value-added tax who
is not a VAT-registered person shall pay a tax
equivalent of 3% of his gross quarterly sales or
receipts.

Provided,

That the following shall be exempt from the


payment of the 3% percentage tax:

1. Cooperatives

2. Self-employed individuals and


professionals availing the 8% tax on
gross sales and/or receipts and other
non-operating income
DECISION

Claims of Refund of Tax Credit Jurisprudence  Claim was filed on time

Issue Addressed  The right to claim the refund must be


reckoned from the “close of the taxable
1. Regarding the claim for refund or tax quarter when the sales were made” – in
credit for excess input taxes. this case September 30, 2004.
2. What date when the claims must be
filed with the BIR and the CTA?  The Court added that the rules under
Sections 204 (C) and 229 as cross-
CIR v. Aichi Forging Company (2010) referred to Section 114 do not apply as
 On September 30, 2004, Aichi Forging they only cover erroneous payments or
filed a claim for refund/credit of input illegal collections of taxes which is not
VAT attributable to its zero-rated sales the case for refund of unutilized input
for the period July 1, 2002 to VAT. 
September 30, 2002 with the CIR  Sec. 31 Chapter VIII Book I of the
through the DOF One-Stop Shop. On the Administrative Code of 1987 being the
same day, Aichi Forging filed a Petition more recent law governing legal period
for Review with the CTA for the same applies making 1 year = 12 months.  The
action. principle of Lex Posterioni Derogati
 The BIR disputed the claim and alleged Priori applies. Thus, the claim was filed
that the same was filed beyond the on time even if 2004 was a leap year.
two-year period given that 2004 was a  Filing of judicial claim was premature
leap year and thus the claim should
have been filed on September 29, 2004.  Section 112 mandates that the taxpayer
filing the refund must either wait for
 The CIR also raised issues related to the the decision of the CIR or the lapse of
reckoning of the 2-year period and the the 120-day period provided therein
simultaneous filing of the administrative before filing its judicial claim. Failure to
and judicial claims observe this rule is fatal to a claim.
Issues  Thus, Section 112 (A) was interpreted to
1. W/N the Petitioner’s administrative refer only to claims filed with the CIR
claim filed out of time? and not appeals to the CTA given that
the word used is “application”.
2. W/N the filing of the judicial claim
premature?  Finally, the Court said that applying the
2-year period even to judicial claims
would render nugatory Section 112 (D)
which already provides for a specific
period to appeal to the CTA --- i.e., (a)
within 30 days after a decision within CIR v. Taganito Mining corp (2011)
the 120-day period and (b) upon expiry
of the 120-day without a decision.  Following the Aichi case, the CTA en
banc dismissed the refund case for
Atlas Consolidated Mining v. CIR (2007) having been prematurely filed by the
petitioner, considering that the
 There are two levels which the claim of administrative claim was filed on
tax credit or refund of value added tax December 30, 2003 while the judicial
must be filled: claim was filed on February 19, 2004.
 Administrative BIR Level: 2 year period CIR v. San Roque Power Co. (2013)
for the filing of a written claim with the
BIR is counted from the “Close of the  As an exception to the mandatory 120 +
taxable quarter when the sales or 30 day period, a judicial claim for VAT
importation or purchase was made” refund which was filed with the CTA
(Sec 112(A) 1997 Tax code) before the lapse of the 120-day period
is considered to have been timely made
 Judicial CTA Level: 2 year period for the if such filing occurred on or after Dec.
filing of a petition for review with the 10, 2003 (date of issuance of BIR Ruling
CTA shall be counted from “date of No. DA-489-03) but before Oct. 6, 2010
filing of the VAT return and payment of (date of promulgation of Aichi  case).
the tax” (Sec 204(C) & 229 of the 1997
Tax code)  BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03, as a general
interpretative rule that may be relied
CIR v. Mirant Pagbilao Corp (2008) upon by the taxpayers, expressly stated
 The reckoning point of the 2 year period that the taxpayer need not wait for the
for the filing of a written claim with the lapse of the 120-day period before it
BIR commences from the “Close of the could seek judicial relief with the CTA by
taxable quarter when the sales or way of petition for review.
importation or purchase was made Taganito Mining corp v. CIR (2013)
pertaining to the input VAT” regardless
of whether said tax was paid or not. • Petition filed before promulgation of
Atlas doctrine
 Sections 204 (C) and 229 of the 1997 tax • Can invoke BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03
code do not apply in a claim for refund which expressly stated that the
of excess input VAT on Zero-rated sales taxpayer need not wait for the lapse of
considering that it is not an erroneous the 120-day period before it could seek
payments or illegal collections of taxes.  judicial relief with the CTA by way of
petition for review

• Since petition was filed before the


adoption of the Aichi doctrine Taganito
was considered to have filed on time.
CIR v. Aichi Consolidated Mining (2014) RA 10963 Train law

 Same facts as previous Aichi case, (1) The successful establishment and
judical claim filed after December 10, implementation of an enhanced VAT refund
2003. system that grants refunds of creditable input
tax within ninety (90) days from the filing of the
 This time BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 was VAT refund application with the Bureau: 
invoked.
Provided, That, to determine the
 Unlike in Aichi 2010 BIR Ruling No. DA- effectivity of item no. 1, all applications filed
489-03 was not raised by any party and from January 1, 2018 shall be processed and
thus was not considered. must be decided within ninety (90) days from
the filing of the VAT refund application; and
Decision
(2) All pending VAT refund claims as of
 Notwithstanding a strict construction of
December 31, 2017 shall be fully paid in cash by
any claim for tax exemption or
December 31, 2019.
refund, the Court in San
Roque recognized that BIR Ruling No. Provided, That the Department of
DA-489-03 constitutes equitable Finance shall establish a VAT refund center in
estoppel in favor of taxpayers. BIR the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and in the
Ruling No. DA-489-03 expressly states Bureau of Customs (BOC) that will handle the
that the "taxpayer-claimant need not processing and granting of cash refunds of
wait for the lapse of the 120-day period creditable input tax.
before it could seek judicial relief with
the CTA by way of Petition for Review.“

 Therefore, respondent's filing of the


judicial claim barely two days after the
administrative claim is acceptable, as it
fell within the period during which the
Court recognized the validity of BIR
Ruling No. DA-489-03.

You might also like