Dr.

Ir. Suprayoga Hadi, MSP

Primary Planner on Regional Development, National Development Planning Agency, Republic of Indonesia
Chairman of Indonesian Development Planners Association (PPPI)
Vice Chairman I of Indonesian Disaster Experts Association (IABI)

4th International Workshop on Multi-hazard Early Warning and Resilience Building in Coastal Communities
and 6th CABARET Project Steering Committee Meeting
School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development (SAPPK), Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB)
Bandung, 6 January 2020
 Outline

1. Introduction of Community Based-Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR)

2. CBDRR in the Context of Disaster Management in Indonesia
3. Steps, Stages and Process of CBDRR
4. Application of Community Participation in Disaster Management
5. Learning from Safer Communities through Disaster Risk Reduction
6. Implication of CBDRR on Disaster Management Policies
7. Closing Remarks

2
 Definition of Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction
1. Community-based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) is an approach that encourages
grassroots communities to manage disaster risk at the local level.
2. These efforts require a series of efforts which include self-interpreting the threats and
risks faced by the disaster, prioritizing the handling/reducing the risk of disasters they
face, reducing and monitoring and evaluating their own performance in disaster
reduction efforts.
3. Pribadi (2008), uses CBDRR by definition as a process of disaster risk management
that actively involves communities at risk in assessing, analyzing, handling,
monitoring, and evaluating disaster risk to reduce their vulnerability and enhance
their capabilities.
4. CBDRR is an inclusive sustainable disaster management framework in which the
community is involved or facilitated to be actively involved in disaster management
(planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation) with maximum local resource
input and minimum external input.
5. CBDRR is also defined as an effort to empower communities to be able to manage
disaster risk with the level of involvement of parties or community groups in planning
and utilization of local resources in implementation activities by the community itself
(Abarquez & Murshed, 2004).

3
 CBDRR in the Disaster Management Context in Indonesia
1. Law 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning which requires the inclusion of a disaster-based spatial
planning with a participatory approach, increasingly providing significant supports to the DRR
community in Indonesia, and by learning from the many initiatives currently in Indonesia there
are many participatory community mapping involves in spatial and land use design.
2. The implementation of CBDRR in Indonesia in the big picture is still looking for forms in the
local context, applied in various development initiatives, such as 'resilient villages',' alert
villages', and 'disaster prepared villages’ are still in the stage of pilot projects from various
versions of non-governmental organizations as well as government and donors, however
everything is still in the experiment stage.
3. Previous initiatives such as in the context of the Merapi Volcano slope community, the
sustainability of the CBDRR practice showed encouraging results, however most CBDRR
initiatives come and are bound by 'donor time' or 'project time' which are clogged and not
connected with ’real social need' which is more flexible in the context of community daily life.
4. CBDRR is a reflection of the belief that communities have full rights to determine the type and
method of disaster management in their context, that arises from the implications of
ownership of basic rights in individuals and communities attached to the right to exercise that
right in the form of an opportunity to determine the direction of one's own life (self
determination), by taken into account that the community has the full right to determine what
and how to manage disaster risk in their own areas.

4
 Position of CBDRR in the Disaster Risk Management System

Disaster Risk Management System &

Climate Change Adaptation in Indonesia
Formal Institutions &

Reduction & Climate

with NGOs & Private
Organization on DRR
and Climate Change

Change Adaptation

Community Based
Public Partnership
Knowledge on Risk

Government Line
Education and

Disaster Risk
(BNPB/BPBD)
Adaptation

Reduction

Ministries
Coordination and Communication
Good Governance Human Rights Sustainable Development Law Enforcement
Community Participation Equality (Gender, Ages, Ethnics). Social Justice Anti-discrimination
Democratizaton Policy Social Welfare Social Development Liberty Peace
Culture and Noble Value Constitutions Five Principles (Pancasila)
Foundation of Disaster Management System and Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia
Source: Paripurno, et.al, (2011)
5
 The Purpose and Importance of CBDRR
1. The aim of the CBDRR is to reduce disaster risk by reducing vulnerability and increasing the capacity of
individual households and communities to manage disaster risk, dealing with the damaging effects of
disasters.
2. The most vulnerable communities and groups are the key actors in CBDRR and outsiders (local and
international NGOs, donor agencies, and other institutions) play a supporting and taking facilitation role
such as helping with situation analysis, measuring the level of planning and implementing the agenda or
consensus of the CBDRR.
3. No one is more interested in understanding disaster problems at the community level than communities
that often survive and deal on the disaster itself, since local communities have the opportunity to better
know the challenges, threats, obstacles, and local forces in dealing with disasters.
4. Local resources in disaster management deserve to be sharpened and developed in a sustainable
manner, therefore the experiences of CBDRR in certain communities can be modified, revised, and
adjusted in other places.
5. Local communities have a unique capacity to deal with local disaster risks, are more sensitive and more
informed about their own environment, they are often more able to predict events that they do not
want, and rich in self-defense experience that has evolved long ago, best suited to the existing socio-
economic, cultural and political environment.
6. Ideally, CBDRR is an approach based on community empowerment to reduce external dependency,
especially during emergencies and in the context of increasing the capacity and resilience of targeted
community life, and furthermore CBDRR also applies the principle of "leave no one behind" and anti-
discrimination based on gender, age, religious groups, race, ethnicity, and anti-discrimination.

6
 Comparison of CBDRR and PB Conventional Approaches
No. Aspects CBDRR Coventional DRR

1. Disaster risk Data and information are more symmetrical and richer, exchanging Asymmetric, and only based on expert opinion and elite
communication information between stakeholders is faster knowledge. Risk communication is top-down
2. Knowledge There is a 'peer-to-peer' knowledge transaction between the Local knowledge that might have been produced by the
transactions and community and the expert / facilitator. Crossfertilization of knowledge community was defeated by expert opinions that were
practices occurs between stakeholders. not sensitive to the local risk context.
3. Time Efficiency More time is needed to invest in the beginning, but in the long run, is The short term is more profitable but in the long run it is
considered to be more sustainable. not sustainable.
4. Cost Efficiency Local resources (knowledge, energy, skills, capital) are maximally More additional costs for longer work hours
available
5. Effectiveness The involvement of many parties has made more local cadres trained Few local actors are trained, dependence on outsiders
to reduce local risks. (experts, government, NGOs)
6. Legitimation The community views the program in a more friendly way. Roots of Participation is low, making the level of legitimacy also
vulnerability and risk issues such as gender inequality, age and class low, because there is a marginalization of marginal
can be reduced because participation opens space for marginalized people with high vulnerability.
people.
7. Equality Equality is a fixed price. The level of risk distribution and the most Lack of vision on reducing vulnerable groups and not
vulnerable groups as targets. being able to reduce the root of the problem of
vulnerability
8. Sustainability Ideally, if elements 1-7 are fulfilled, then sustainability is assumed to be Sustainability is difficult to achieve because of
very likely to be achieved due to self-mobilization from the community. dependence on outsiders, unable to explore local
Higher community dignity increases the ability to reduce its own risk. capacity to reduce vulnerability and capacity.
Source: Paripurno, et.al (2011) 7
 Community Participation in Disaster Risk Reduction
1. Community participation is a process of giving or sharing broader authority to the
community to jointly solve various problems including disasters, that needs a division
of authority that based on the level of community participation in these activities.
2. Community participation aims to seek answers to problems in a better way, by giving
the role of the community to contribute so that the implementation of activities runs
effectively, efficiently, and sustainably.
3. Community participation is carried out starting from the stages of concept making,
construction, operational-maintenance activities, as well as evaluation and
supervision.
4. CBDRR with minimum requirements is highly recommended so that the community is
not just a partner in DRR activities, but also has authority in decision making and
control over risk management without eliminating the responsibilities of other
respective stakeholders in DRR.
5. The purpose of community disaster management and risk reduction is to reduce
vulnerability and strengthen community capacity to deal with the disaster risks they
face.
6. Direct involvement of the community in implementing risk reduction measures at the
local level is a must.
8
 Level of Community Participation in DRR

8. Community control on DRR

7. Delegation of Authority on DRR

6. Partnership on DRR

5. Passive consensus on DRR

4. Consultation on DRR

3. Informing about DRR

2. Therapy on DRR

1. Manipulative Participation on DRR

Source: Arnstein (1969) and Hart (1999)

9
 The Legal Foundation of CBDRR

1. Law 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management

Participation was explicitly emphasized by Law 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management
during the post-disaster reconstruction, which is seen in 5 chapters in chapters 4, 26,
59, 60 and 69, mostly related with reconstruction policy;
2. Government Regulation 21 of 2008 on Implementation of Disaster
Management
However, civil society participation in disaster risk analysis and assessment is also
stipulated in Article 87 of Government Regulation 21 of 2008 with the title
"Participation and Participation of Social Institutions/ Organizations, Business
Community, and Society” in order to increase participation to help the strengthening
of disaster prone areas towards a better and safer condition of the disaster prone
areas, and to encourage participation in the field of funding and disaster
preparedness activities.

10
 Steps and Process of CBDRR

INITIATIVES Building interaction DRR

Community & understanding Implementation
Selection community by community
Checklist: Building Checklist: Checklist: Checklist: Checklist:
• Disaster history Communication: • Participatory • Village level • Village committe • Impact
• Isolation • Live-in with daily Rapid contigency plan on disaster risk evaluation
• Community activities assessment • Village management • Effectiveness &
relation history • Learning from (PDRA/PCRA) regulation • Local efficiency on
• High community • Hazard (social contract) community implementation
vulnerability Understanding assessment • Distribution of organization & structure &
• Potential of Community: • Capacity stakeholders volunteers process
disaster • Mapping of assessment responsibility • Clear mandates • Significant
episentrum local socio- • Community • Capacity of institutions positive &
• Value of DRM culture perseption on building on disaster negative
benefit taker • Local livelihood disaster risks (training) • Revision/adjust changes
system • Issues and • Mobilization of ment of targets • Ddocumentation
• Geographic opportunnities external & plans • Lessons
caracteristics support • Working learned
• Extreem • Coordination & networks • Best practices
vulnerability networking plan • Community • Exit strategy
• Conflict history • Advocacy (if organization • CBDDRM audit
• Social analysis necessary) management

Source: Paripurno, et.al, (2011)

11
 Stages of Disaster Risk Management (ISO 3100)

COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTATION

• Contextual • Risks identi- • Risks • Risk • Risks mana-

setting fication analysis Evaluation gement
• Strategy • Hazards • Capacity • Risk • Actions iden-
assessment evaluation estimation tification
• Stakeholders
• Vulnerability • Impact • Risk • Actions
• Criteria assessment evaluation reduction chosen
• Key • What, • Estimation • Risk mana- • Actions
elements Where, How of Risks level gement planning

MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Source: Paripurno, et.al, (2011)

12
 10 Determinants of CBDRR Success
1. Apply best or good practice in developing CBDRR, that requires balance between
participation (bottom-up) and external input (top-down).
2. Adopt traditional organizational structures (indigenous or local communities) and
decision-making mechanisms (formal and informal).
3. Capacity building activities (community and community organization).
4. Various forms and channels or media for public awareness and education by paying
attention to dialects, values, and culture.
5. Multi-stakeholder Partnership.
6. Community is the main actor, external parties and organization are merely facilitators.
7. Vision of community disaster, community ownership, real community participation.
8. Strengthening capacity (training or workshops) throughout the entire project or program
cycle — including technical and non-technical aspects.
9. Community assistance with a vision of social changes.
10. Preservation of the vision of CBDRR by the community organization and the community.
13
15 Principles of CBDRR (Recommendations of 2006 CBDRR National Conference)
1. Conducting disaster risk reduction efforts with communities in disaster prone areas, so that the community itself is
able to manage disaster risk independently.
2. Avoiding the emergence of new vulnerabilities and community dependence in disaster-prone areas on outsiders.
3. Disaster management is an inseparable part of the process of development and management of natural resources for
the sustainability of community life in disaster prone areas.
4. A multisector, multidisciplinary and multicultural approach.
5. A holistic approach (through all stages of disaster management) and integrative (linking programs and other needs).
6. Participatory from planning to results of the program (strata, groups, gender).
7. Empowerment, not just ‘return to normal’ so that if the same threat comes again, the same disaster does not re-
occur.
8. Do not damage the existing system, including local beliefs or traditions.
9. Conducting local partnerships, the program will continue, in selecting areas that require outside intervention.
10. Open yourself to facilitate other institutions.
11. Humanitarian work is not benevolent but must be accountable to the community, so there must be a principle of
accountability.
12. Prioritizing the role and participation of (local) communities in dealing with disasters.
13. Emphasize community involvement in educational programs.
14. Transparent.
15. Build trust and reciprocity.
14
CBDRR Approach that Focuses on Localities (Village Communities)
1. Disaster risk management by the community is a process to encourage communities in
disaster prone areas to be able to independently handle the threats that exist in their
environment and the vulnerabilities that exist in themselves.
2. Communities dealing with risks need to be actively involved in identifying, analyzing, acting,
monitoring and evaluating disaster risk to reduce vulnerability and increase their capacity,
which means that the community is at the center of decision making and implementing
disaster risk management activities.
3. CBDRR is not only seen as a project, but also a process of community organizing, the
sustainability of risk management by the community with its own institutions becomes a
necessity;
4. The implementation of CBDRR in the local context, especially villages, needs to be supported
by the readiness and capacity of human resources at the community level, especially
community at the village level;
5. The change in village paradigm, which is more concerned with the principles of recognition
and subsidiarity, shows the role of village communities is becoming increasingly important in
decision making, including in the framework of community-based DRR at the village level;
6. Utilization of village funds and local village facilitators needs to be considered in the
framework of implementing CBDRR, to support disaster preparedness villages and empower
village communities in reducing disaster risks.

15
 ONE OF PRIORITIES OF VILLAGE FUND TO SUPPORT VILLAGE CBDRR
(Ministry of Village Regulation 22 of 2016)

Priority Use of Village Funds is used for the implementation of programs and activities in the field of
village development and community empowerment in accordance with the needs which agreed upon in
village meetings and published to the public in public spaces.

In the program and activity planning process, villages can consider village typologies based on the
level of development of the village's progress status in the Village Development Index (IDM).

Aimed at supporting the development of One Village, One Superior Product, Business Community
Network, Village Economic Potential Sectors (optimizing village resources for welfare) and Village
Cultural Circle (development process as part of cultural practice).

a. Village Development for the fulfillment of Infrastructure Facilities, Basic Social Services, Village
Economic Facilities, Water Catchment and Reservoir Facilities, Environmental Conservation,
Natural Disaster Management;
b. Community Empowerment: Improving the Quality of Basic Social Services, Management of
Local Resources, Management of Productive Economic Enterprises, Strengthening Disaster
Capacity, Environmental Conservation and Strengthening Democratic Village Governance.
16
 RESILIENT VILLAGE INITIATIVES THROUGH CBDRR
5 Components of resilient communities
• UNDP provided support to the Indonesian Government on implementation of
Community-based DRR (CBDRR) through Safer Community Through Disaster Risk
Reduction in Development (SC-DRR, 2007-2012) Project
• Community-based DRR application was implemented using the disaster resilient
community scheme (J.Twigg, DFID, 2007)

Governance Risk Assessment Knowledge and

Education

Risk Management Disaster

and Vulnerability Preparedness and
Reduction Response

17
Summary of CBDRR achievement to the thematic areas of resilience community
No Thematic Areas SCDRR’s CBDRR Key Initiatives Level of Achievement

1. Governance • Establishment multi-stakeholder Disaster • The communities have established the local DRR forum comprises of different
Risk Reduction forum on disaster risk community groups (village official, traditional/informal leaders, women
reduction group, health centers, youth group, farmer group, etc). The forum will be the
• Integration of initiatives for disaster risk agent of change in the village for DRR initiatives.
reduction into community’s gathering forum, • The villages have integrated DM and DRR into MTVDP through consultation
village planning and regulations. and musrenbang process
• The communities have formulated and endorsed the village regulations (DRR
Forum, CAP, DM Plan, Contingency Plan, MTVDP)
2. Risk Assessment Capability of the communities in identifying The communities are able to formulate the risk map and village profiles
and understanding the local hazards, describing the local HVCA
Vulnerability, capacity, and analyzing disaster
risks.
3. Knowledge and Documentation of lesson learned and The project produced the modules and tools for facilitating the CBDRR from the
Education implementation modules for community-based real experiences
disaster risk reduction.
4. Risk Availability and implementation of Disaster • The communities are able to formulate and implement the DRR structural and
management and Risk Reduction Action Plan (structural and non- non-structural measures addressing the identified local risk
vulnerability structural) village level • The communities are able to build partnership and create synergy with local
reduction government and other key stakeholders
5. Disaster Availability and exercising (drill) Contingency • The communities are able to prepare and respond to locally agreed early
Preparedness & Plan at village level warning system
Response • The communities know what actions to be taken during the crisis including
providing support to vulnerable groups (women, children, etc)
18
 RESILIENCE VILLAGES THROUGH CBDRR

Application of community –based disaster risk reduction

1. CBDRR was implemented in 44 villages of 5
provinces in partnership with 22 local NGOs;
2. Improved awareness, capacity of local community
to identify risks, prepare required plans (disaster
management, contingency, action plans) and
measures;
3. Strengthened village community institution with
establishment village DRR forum;
4. Integrated these plans measures into village
development plan;
5. Improved the capacity of local NGOs on CBDRR
The community of Mulyodadi Village is preparing facilitation and project management.
village risk map in Bantul District, Yogyakarta Province

19
 WHAT WORK FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITY MODEL

Some notes from the experiences

1. Partnership with local NGOs is essential to
impart knowledge and skill to local communities
for improving village resilience;
2. Interaction between local NGOs and district
government on CBDRR implementation can
improve partnership and cooperation for future
leveraging and replication;
3. Utilization of local culture and tradition is
effective for disseminating public awareness
messages at village level;
4. Identifying and working with local champion at
village level is critical in leading the change and The community-based coastal protection in
Leomada Village, Sikka District, East Nusa
as driver of change.
Tenggara Province

20
 WHAT WORK FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITY MODEL

Some notes from the experiences

1. Engagement of local government is an ultimate
key to ensure the integration of community
action plans into local development plan;
2. Alignment with other community-based
development program such as PNPM is
beneficial and complimentary to infuse the
DRR measures for this infrastructure/ physical
improvement project;
3. Gender-sensitive approach encouraged
participation of women on CBDRR activities
especially if they are engaged and actively Consultation with women group in Jorong Pondok,
participated on DRR forum. Pasaman District, West Sumatera Province

21
 LESSONS LEARNED AND CHALLENGES FROM CBDRR PRACTICES
1. The CBDRR application in post disaster communities (e.g. Yogyakarta and West
Sumatera Provinces) are highly receptive to the disaster risk reduction messages and
measures, the strong reverence to local wisdom and knowledge along with high
respect to tradition can be beneficial and better with support from evident-based
knowledge;
2. CBDRR application demands strong capacities (facilitation and management) of local
NGOs to facilitate the process;
3. Translating the DRR sophisticated languages to simple and understandable messages
to local communities are essential, especially to overcome the communication gap;
4. Clear guidance is required for implementing and managing community grant (fund)
for ensuring sustainability post intervention;
5. Linking community-based DRR plans with local development plans through existing
development planning mechanism (Musrenbang) is instrumental to make CBDRR as
part of normal development process, which will required clear policy and guidance.

22
 Implications into National and Local Initiatives
1. National policies on developing resilient village has been based on real experiences,
which shown by the case of the formulation of BNPB regulation 01 of 2012;
2. Government-led CBDRR initiatives needs to engage the local NGOs as equal partner,
there is a challenge to establish this kind of partnership given their different and
unique roles;
3. The local government requires clear direction and strong capacities on leading and
funding CBDRR for achieving resilient villages;
4. Funding resources of local government for supporting CBDRR is frequently limited,
partnership with private sector through CSR practices can be used as alternative for
scaling up and replication;
5. CBDRR should focus more on reducing risk with mitigation measures rather than
preparedness, however preparedness can be use as an entry point;
6. Resilient village can be achieved with committed government (legislative and
executive), supportive and capable local NGOs and receptive communities.

23
 CLOSING REMARKS
Learning from Building Resilience Community through DDRR Practices
1. Disaster Management (DM) and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) need support from
community participation in improving the quality and objectives of DM and DRR;
2. CBDRR is a key factor in participatory DRR, by increasing local community capacity to
identify their own risks through HVCA (hazard-vulnerability-capacity assessment) and
PRA (participatory risk assessment) exercises to formulate and implement the action
plan to reduce the risks as well as the ability to prepare and respond to early warning;
3. Community Settlement Plan (CSP) incorporated with DRR is synergized to the village
development planning process to ensure the safer community and settlement at the
village and community level.
4. Formulation locally manuals and guidelines for disaster mitigation and prepareness in
necessary to promote disaster risk reduction at the village and community level.
5. BNPB has adopted CBDRR as national policies in developing Resilient Village (Desa
Tangguh) and conducted as regular activities, supported by optimalization of village
funds and local village facilitators in implementing CBDRR, to strengthen disaster
resilience villages and communities in reducing disaster risks.
24
 Brief Curriculum Vitae
Educations 1 Doctor in Planning and Development, Studies, University of Southern California (USC), USA, 2002
2 Master in Regional Planning, Bandung Institute of Technology, 1990
3 Bachelor in Social Economic Agriculture, Lampung University,1987
Structural Official 1 Director General of Special Regional Development, Ministry of Village, May 2015 - April 2017
Career 2 Director General of Village Development and Empowerment, Ministry of Village, February - May 2015
3 Deputy Minister of Resource Development, Ministry of Disadvantaged Region, March – October 2014
4 Deputy Minister of Special Area Development, Ministry of Disadvantaged Region, June 2011 - March 2014
5 Director of Special Area and Disadvantaged Region, Ministry of Planning, August 2005 - June 2011.
Functional Planning 1 Primary Planner, Deputy Minister of Regional Development, Bappenas, May 2017 - Oktober 2018
Career 2 Chief of Planner, Deputy Minister of Regional Development, Bappenas, since Oktober 2018 -

Dr. Suprayoga Hadi, born in Jakarta, on May 30, 1965, is currently assigned as Primary Planner at the Deputy Minister for Regional Development, Ministry of
National Development Planning/BAPPENAS, Republic of Indonesia. Before rejoining to BAPPENAS in May 2017, he had served as Director General of the
Development of Special Regions and Director General of Development and Empowerment of Village Communities at the Ministry of Village, Development of
Disadvantaged Areas and Transmigration in 2015-2017, continuing his duties as Deputy for Resource Development and Deputy of Development of Special
Areas in the Ministry of Development of Disadvantaged Regions of the Republic of Indonesia starting in 2011 until 2015. Before joining the Ministry of
Development of Disadvantaged Areas in June 2011, he served as Director of Special Areas and Disadvantaged Areas at the Ministry of National Development
Planning / BAPPENAS starting in the year 2005 to 2011. His career at BAPPENAS began in 1990, with various assignments related to planning, programming
and monitoring of policies and strategies for the development of Disadvantaged Regions, Border Areas, Disaster-prone regions and in the Development of
Special Regions in Indonesia, especially Papua and Aceh, and has been recognized globally as "Focal Person" for disaster management policies especially
disaster risk reduction and post-disaster recovery, included in post-conflict area recovery in Indonesia. Since 2006, he has become a focal person in particular
for disaster risk reduction policy initiatives in Indonesia, in collaboration with several international donor agencies, such as the World Bank, ADB, and UNDP,
where he has been appointed as "National Project Directors" for several projects related to disaster recovery and conflict resolution programs in Indonesia. In
line with the assignment as Official of BAPPENAS, the Ministry of Disadvantaged Region and the Ministry of Village, since 1992 he has also been active as a
lecturer and mentor in post-graduate programs at prominent state universities in Indonesia. After obtaining a Regional Planning Master Degree at the
Bandung Institute of Technology in 1990 and a Bachelor's Degree in Social Economics in Agriculture at Lampung University in 1987, he continued his doctoral
program at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA in 1998 and succeeded completed his Doctorate in Planning and Development Studies in
2002. From his professional career, in 2013 he was awarded by the UNDP as N-Peace Awardee on Male Champion for Equality for Demonstrated Leadership
and Commitment towards Building Peace, and since 2017 sitting in the management of IABI (Association of Indonesian Disaster Experts) for the period of
2017-2021 as Deputy Chairperson I in charge of Cooperation, and also serving as the Chairman of the Indonesian Government Planners Association (AP2I) for
the period of 2018-2021.
25