Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is JCI
What Is JCI
What Is JCI
Join Commission International an independent not for profit organization accredits and
certify healthcare organization and programs across the globe. Joint Commissions
International accreditation and certification is recognized as a global leader for health care
quality of care and patient’s safety.
JCI identifies measures and share best practices in quality and patient safety with the
world. They provide leadership and innovative solutions to help health care organization
across all settings improve performances and outcomes.
Founded in 1951, The Joint Commission seeks to continuously improve health care for the
public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating health care organizations and
inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.
The Joint Commission evaluates and accredits more than 22,000 health care organizations
and programs in the United States.
An independent, not-for-profit organization, The Joint Commission is the nation's oldest and
largest standards-setting and accrediting body in health care. To earn and
maintain The Gold Seal of Approval® from The Joint Commission an organization must
undergo an on-site survey by a Joint Commission survey team at least every three years.
(Laboratories must be surveyed every two years.)
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Al7QFfVd-jOz4ncDBkYktUbjtiOA5OFf
How does an institution apply?
Any hospital may apply for Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation if it meets all
the following criteria:
• The hospital is located outside of the United States and its territories.
• The hospital is currently operating as a health care provider in the country, is
licensed to provide care and treatment as a hospital (if required), and, at minimum,
does the following:
• The hospital provides services addressed by the current JCI accreditation standards
for hospitals.
• The hospital assumes, or is willing to assume, responsibility for improving the quality
of its care and services.
• The hospital is open and in full operation, admitting and discharging a volume of
patients that will permit the complete evaluation of the implementation and sustained
compliance with all current JCI accreditation standards for hospitals.
• The hospital meets the conditions described in the current Accreditation Participation
Requirements (APRs).
Academic medical center hospital applicants must meet each of the criteria above in
addition to the following three criteria:
The health care providers, government ministries, public health agencies, academic
institutions, and businesses to achieve peak performance in patient care. By developing
and maintaining international standards for health care quality and patient safety, we
address the unique challenges of preserving quality care as patients move across the care
continuum. Standards are developed and organized around important functions common to
all health care organizations. In fact, the functional organization of standards is now the
most widely used around the world and has been validated by scientific study, testing, and
application.
To maintain best practices, JCI turns to its Standards Advisory Panel, comprised of
experienced physicians, nurses, administrators, and public-policy experts. The panel
guides the development and revision process of the JCI accreditation standards. Panel
members are from five major world regions: Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia and the
Pacific Rim, the Middle East, Europe, and the United States. The panel’s recommendations
are refined based on an international field review of the standards and input from experts
and others with unique content knowledge.
JCI is committed to keeping pace with the dynamics of global health care while remaining
the standard bearer for The Gold Seal of Approval®, a universally recognized symbol of
quality and patient safety.
Here are 12 steps that health care organizations typically follow toward accreditation
success.
Choosing your teams and getting them ready for the next steps in accreditation preparation
will promote accountability, create a sense of ownership, and improve overall staff
engagement.
Tracers are a primary tool for risk assessment and gap analysis.
JCI has resources to help you understand what they are and explain the activities and skills
involved in conducting them.
A critical part of accreditation preparation is finding the gaps between your current practice
and what JCI requires.
• JCI can help you plan and carry out that activity, including categorizing the
types of gaps you find.
• Perform a baseline assessment of your hospital’s performance against JCI
standards
Knowing how to manage data is necessary to be able to assess quality and patient safety.
• Data collection, display, and analysis plays a critical role in continuous quality
improvement.
Every organization needs action plans that outline how to address issues found in the initial
gap analysis.
• Build your accreditation action plan that outlines intended actions towards
performance improvement
•
11. Improve and Document Standards Compliance
Most of your accreditation preparation will involve monitoring, modifying, and documenting
action plans to ensure improvement and compliance.
• Assess your hospital’s risk for adverse events and create a method for
collecting information
• Use your accreditation team to spot deficiencies using tools from the Survey
Process Guide for Hospitals
• Encourage staff to make corrections
The Joint Commission International (JCI) Accreditation Program is one of the most widely
recognized all over the world . JCI is the internationalization of the Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH), founded in the USA in 1951. Since 1987 this institution
has evolved towards the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
(JCAHO), extending the accreditation model to other health institutions, in addition to
hospitals. JCI was established in 1994 as a division of JCAHO with the goal of facilitating
accreditation services worldwide in more than 90 countries. In 2013, JCI published the 5th
edition of its international accreditation standards for hospitals, which include a section for
academic medical centers.
Joint Commission International (JCI) is one of the world’s leading nonprofit patient safety
organizations. JCI seeks a world where every patient receives the highest quality of care
possible.
The most visible way we pursue this goal is through our accreditation program. To that end,
JCI regularly publishes a demanding set of standards that represent the most current
thinking in patient safety and quality improvement. Health care organizations that are
capable of meeting these standards must undergo a comprehensive and rigorous on-site
survey conducted by JCI in order to achieve accreditation. Once accredited, organizations
must continue to meet our standards and are regularly assessed through periodic re-
survey. JCI is completely independent from the organizations we accredit.
JCI also works to improve the quality of care within all hospitals, not just those that are
capable of meeting our accreditation standards. Our global experts regularly assist
hospitals, municipal governments, and ministries of health as they pursue their own quality
goals and patient care outcomes.
ISO 9001 is a quality management system standard that consists of principles that help
ensure standardized levels of quality are applied across all organizations and sectors of the
Healthcare Industry including Pharmaceutical Companies, Ambulatory Care, Long-term
Care Facilities, Hospitals, among others. Healthcare service providers often choose ISO
9001 as their primary management system registration and then evaluate how other
standards may be of benefit to the organization, possibly through an integrated approach.
With the implementation of a quality management system using ISO 9001, a health service
provider can implement a process for continual improvement, as well as reduce
inefficiencies and waste, thereby experiencing a significant cost savings, while maintaining
a focus on patient/client satisfaction.
ISO 9001 certifications are receiving increasingly greater interest from health institutions.
Specifically in the US, this increased attention has been accelerated since in 2008 the most
influential insurance companies in the United States, the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS), approved Det Norske Veritas Healthcare (DNV Healthcare) as
the new authority to judge Medicare payments, renewing this condition for six years in 2012
. DNV Healthcare developed a National Integrated Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations (NIAHO) program, which is being used to accredit hospitals under the CMS
Participation Conditions (CoPs) and combined the CoPs standards with the Requirements
of ISO 9001: 2008. In 2013, DNV and Germanischer Lloyd (GL) merged. In response, the
Joint Commission announced in 2011 its relationship with Société Générale de
Surveillance SA –SGS – (Switzerland) to offer ISO 9001 certification as part of the service
it offers. In this way, the ISO 9001 system has become a model to follow to achieve
hospital accreditation and maintain the standards necessary to preserve it.
With the ISO 9001 standard the health institution can obtain benefits such as: • Well-
defined areas of responsibility and greater knowledge of top management of how the
institution works.
Among other added values that the ISO 9001 implementation brings to the health
institution, Nolan includes internal audits and periodic reviews of the quality management
system by management, monitoring and control of suppliers and customer satisfaction
(patients and their families), taking corrective actions, better information, communication
and motivation of employees and, finally, risk management and improvement. ISO 9001:
2015 is based on seven quality management principles (customer focus; leadership;
engagement of people; process approach; improvement; evidence-based decision making;
relationship management), which allow managers to take a holistic view of the
management of their organization, managing risks in a timely manner and using different
quality improvement tools.
There is no antagonism between ISO 9001 quality certification and hospital accreditation,
on the contrary, they complement each other in the search for excellence in the delivery of
health services. Both represent a third-party recognition of compliance with quality
standards, strengthening the image of the health institution to society and contributing to
the satisfaction of all stakeholders. Both tools are expected to provide patients with better
quality health care. The joint application of both standards generates a favorable framework
for the improvement of the organization’s processes and for patients to receive a better
service.
Both ISO 9001 certifications and hospital accreditations are fundamental instruments to
improve the quality of the health service and to give credibility to the health institution in
front of the society regarding the efficiency in its processes. Both guide efforts to improve
patient safety and elevate the culture with respect to quality, including safety aspects.
However, there are some differences between these instruments. The hospital
accreditations, being a sectoral mechanism, have a more technical character and are
based on the best practices of the quality of the medical assistance, oriented directly to the
attention of the patients. The ISO 9001 standard is more process-oriented and is designed
to help organizations anticipate the risks in their management and take the necessary
actions to manage them.
Hospital accreditation audits are performed by professionals who know the medical field in
depth, while ISO 9000 standards are generic and audits of certification involve auditors of
quality management systems, qualified to meet internationally agreed criteria by an
organization Independent, in conjunction with medical experts. Another difference between
accreditation and certification is that certification is the health institution that defines the
scope of the same, while in the scope is defined by the accreditation standard itself. Many
health institutions attest to ISO 9001 their support processes, such as the management of
medical equipment and engineering systems. Notwithstanding the undeniable advantages
of ISO 9001 certification, some authors consider that the standard is difficult to understand
and interpret in the health sector, and requires a significant effort in overtime of personnel,
resources, external training courses and consulting and the own cost of the certification
process. It is noteworthy that these same authors, even after achieving ISO 9001:2000
certification of three hemodialysis centers, maintain nomenclature errors in their own
accreditation and certification activities.
Instruments for external evaluation of hospitals and for their internal quality management
analyzed are useful for improving the health services and they serve as tools to give
confidence to the society regarding the quality level of institutions that make up national
health systems. Both the accreditation standards and the ISO 9001 standard serve as
strategic guidance to improve the quality of service including the patient safety. Patient-
centered accreditation standards guarantee the technical quality of the service while the
ISO 9001 quality management system is the guarantor for the sustained success of the
health organization. The joint implementation of both standards allows to achieving and
maintaining the high quality standards of medical care required by society.
REFERENCES:
Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals 6th Edition | Effective
1 July 2017 Including Standards for Academic Medical Center Hospitals
https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/accreditation/pathway-to-accreditation/