Central University of South Bihar School of Law& Governance

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BIHAR

School of Law& Governance


PROJECT TOPICS ON ADR

BALL.B (8TH SEMESTER)

Last Date of Submission:-27-04-2020

Sl. No. NAME OF THE PROJECT TOPICS


STUDENTS
1. AARYA SHARMA Arbitration as an ADR Mechanism
2. AKASH KUMAR Expert Determination as ADR
3. ANIKET RANJAN ADR Institutions Across the World
4. ANJALI ANANTA UNCITRAL Model Law
5. ANKIT KUMAR CPC and ADR
6. ANKIT KUMAR VATS New York Convention Awards
7. ANSHU Geneva Convention Awards
8. ANUJ KAMAL International Commercial Arbitration
9. ANUPAM PRABHAT
Conciliation as ADR
SHRIVASTAVA
10. BABLU KUMAR Mediation as ADR
11. BHABYA RANI Mediation and Indian Judicial System
12. CHANDAN KUMAR Access to Justice and Lok Adalat
13. DEEPAK KUMAR Ombudmanpersons as ADR Mechanism
14. DIVYA MEGHNA Geneva Convention Awards
15. GANESH OJHA International Commercial Arbitration
16.
GAUTAM KUMAR Various kinds of ADR mechanisms in India and
RANJAN Abrod

17. History and Reasons behind introduction of ADR


ISHA ANAND in India.

18.
JAYSHREE Sources of International Arbitration Laws

19.
KRITI PATHAK Nature and scope of Legal Services Authority Act

20. Analysis of case - Firm Ashok Traders v.


KUMAR ANKIT Gurumukh Das Saluja, 2004 (3) SCC 155,
Arbitration clause a separate agreement)
21. KUMAR SONAL
Analysis of case -N Konkan Railways Corp. Ltd.
v. Mehul Construction Co. (2000) 7 SCC 201.
(Objectives of the ACT.)

22. KUMAR ABHISHEK


23. Analysis of Case-
KUMARI ANJALI
Sundaram Finance Ltd v. NEPC India Ltd. AIR
SINHA
1999 S.C 565
24. Analysis of Case-
MANASI KUMARI
P.Anand Gajapathi Raju Vs PVG Raju
25. Analysis of Case-
MANISH KUMAR P.Anand Gajapathi Raju Vs PVG Raju, 2000 SC
SINGH 1886
26. Analysis of Case-
MAYANK SHEKHAR Wellington Association Ltd v. Kirti Mehta, AIR
2000 SC 1379. (S. 7 of the ACT.)
27. Analysis of Case-
Jayant N.Seth v. Gyaneshwar Apartment
MEENAKSHI PRIYA Cooperative Housing Society Ltd, 2000(1) RAJ
117 (Bom),
28. Analysis of Case-
NIHARIKA SINGH Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja,
2004 (3) SCC 155,
29. Analysis of Case-
PRABHAKAR KUMAR Babar Ali v. Union of India, (2000) 2 SCC 178,
(constitutionality).
30. Analysis of Case-
PRAFULLA Motilal v. Kedarmal Jainarayan Bharadiya,
2002(3) RAJ 403 (Bom
31. Analysis of Case-
RAJA KUMAR Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. Sumathi and
others, 2000(4) SCC 543,
32. Analysis of Case-
SANJEET KUMAR
ONGC v. Saw Pipes, (Public Policy Case) (2003)
SINGH
5 SCC 705.
33. Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of
SHAN KUMAR Maharashtra, 2000(6) SCC 179, (s. 72).
34. Analysis of Case-
SHUBHAM ABHIJIT Mysore Cements Ltd v. Svedal Barmac Ltd.,
2003 (10) SCC 375,
35. Analysis of Case-
SONI KUMARI Hassneh Insurance Co of Israel v. Steuart J Mew,
1986 Revue de l’ Arbitrage 583,
36. Analysis of Case-
UTTAM KUMAR Atlantic Shipping and Trading Company v.
Dreyfus and Company.
37. Analysis of Case-
VINITA KUMARI
Gurumukh Das Saluja, 2004 (3) SCC 155,
38. Analysis of Case-
VINITA KUMARI Sundaram Finance Ltd v. NEPC India Ltd. AIR
1999 S.C 565
39. Analysis of Case-
VISHNU MANJARI Mysore Cements Ltd v. Svedal Barmac Ltd., 2003
(10) SCC 375,
40. Analysis of Case-
VIVEK KUMAR Hassneh Insurance Co of Israel v. Steuart J
Mew, 1986 Revue de l’ Arbitrage 583,
41. Analysis of Case-
VIVEK RAJ Atlantic Shipping and Trading Company v.
Dreyfus and Company.
42. Analysis of Case-
ZAINUL ABEDEEN Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of
Maharashtra, 2000(6) SCC 179, (s. 72).
43. Analysis of Case-
SANDEEP KUMAR Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja,
2004 (3) SCC 155,
44. Analysis of Case-
RUPALI SINHA Babar Ali v. Union of India, (2000) 2 SCC 178,
45. Analysis of Case-
VIKKY KUMAR Motilal v. Kedarmal Jainarayan Bharadiya,
2002(3) RAJ 403 (Bom),
46. Analysis of Case-
VISHAL RANJAN Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. Sumathi and
others, 2000(4) SCC 543,
47. Analysis of Case-
AMITESH TEJASWI Union of India v. MAA Agency, 2003(3) RAJ 335
(Bom),.
48. Analysis of Case-
SURYAKANT ONGC v. Saw Pipes, (Public Policy Case) (2003)
5 SCC 705.
49. Awinash Kumar Analysis of Case-
Haresh Dayaram Thakur v. State of
Maharashtra, 2000(6) SCC 179, (s. 72).
50. Analysis of Case-
Rudra Kant Pandey Mysore Cements Ltd v. Svedal Barmac Ltd.,
2003 (10) SCC 375,
51. Analysis of Case-
Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja,
Mohini Kumari 2004 (3) SCC 155, Arbitration clause a separate
agreement)
52. Analysis of Case-
Kumar Kishan Mysore Cements Ltd v. Svedal Barmac Ltd.,
2003 (10) SCC 375
53. Analysis of Case-
RISHABH KUMAR Union of India v. MAA Agency, 2003(3) RAJ 335
(Bom),

BA.LLB (8th Semester)

Last date of Submission:-27/04/2020

You might also like