Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Ancistrodon Leucostoma: The in W
Study Ancistrodon Leucostoma: The in W
iVs OTHER duties permitted during the past three years, I have been
studying the cottonmouth Ancistrodon piscivorus leucostoma Troost
in Kentucky. As there is practically nothing in the literature regard-
ing the status of this species in the state, it is considered advisable
to put on record my findings to date.
I am my students, past and
considerably indebted to several of
and examining the specimens, and
present, for assistance in collecting
to the University Research Fund Committee of the University of
Kentucky for financial assistance.
Distribution
If one believed the reports of laymen, he would be forced to con-
clude that the cottonmouth occurs in every stream in Kentucky, and
abundantly in most. Actually, present valid records indicate the
cottonmouth to be confined to the western end of the state, reaching
their greatest abundance in the Jackson Purchase.
I have observed and collected cottonmouths in only two Kentucky
Characteristics
The young at birth are brightly colored, the top of the head
especially so, strongly suggesting the copperhead. The last inch or
so of the tail is a bright yellow. This yellow generally is lost dorsally
by the time the animal reaches a length of 410 millimeters, but may
Transactions of the Kentucky Academy of Science, 17 (1) : 33-41. February, 1956.
34 Roger W. Barhour
the ventrals ranged from 131-139 with the same average, 135.3.
Caudals in the females ranged from 17-56 with an average of 43 in ;
the males, caudals ranged from 30-54, with an average of 45.7. Neck
scale rows in the females ranged from 23-27, averaging 24.8 in the ;
males they ranged from 23-26, averaging 24.6. Middle scale rows in
the females ranged from 23-25, averaging 24.8; in the males, they
ranged from 23-26, also averaging 24.8. In not one of the 108 snakes
critically examined were the caudals uniformly single. They were
arranged in all sorts of unusual combinations of divided and un-
divided plates, that can be correlated with neither age nor sex. One
example will suffice Number 28, a 720 mm. female taken April 17,
:
Habitat
The cottonmouth in Kentucky is a creature of cypress swamps,
oxbow lakes, bayous, and sluggish streams.
Undoubtedly the most extensive cottonmouth habitat in the state
lines in northeastern Hickman County, in the Obion Creek drainage.
Here is an area of several thousand acres of swampland, with a few
A Study of the Cottonmouth 35
k Ia iUlik
ciAss sue
here that the cottonmouth reaches its greatest abundance in the area.
Abundance
The cottonmouth, because of its restricted habitat and distribu-
tion, should not be considered a common Kentucky snake. I am con-
danced, however, that in places the species reaches a population
density exceeded by no other snake in the state. It is practically im-
possible to obtain an accurate count of the snakes in a given area for
several obvious reasons, but counts in several small areas of approxi-
mately a thousand square feet each indicates a population in selected
sections of the swamp exceeding 300 cottonmouths to the acre. On
April 9, 1955, five men, including the author (two experienced col-
in two hours. No count was kept of those we saw and did not catch.
On numerous occasions I have seen as many as four or five snakes
sunning themselves on the same pile of drift. A native of the area
told me that in early April of 1953, he stood in one spot on a beaver
dam and shot 18 cottonmouths as fast as he could reload his shotgun.
Habits
In August and early September the snakes begin a rather
late
leisurely exodus from the swamplands of Murphy's Pond to the
adjacent low wooded hillsides. Here they go into any available hole
in the ground to hibernate.
In spring, with the advent of warm weather, they forsake the
winter holes and return to the swamp. A few consecutive warm
days in March will set off the migration. In early April a few
youngsters born the preceding fall may still be found in the woods,
hiding under logs and stumps, or even actively on their way to the
water, but the larger snakes are well distributed in the swamps. The
j^oungsters are almost wholly confined to the first hundred yards of
the swamp immediately bordering the hillsides. By late April the
youngsters are farther from the hills, and by June are well distributed
throughout the swamp.
During the day, the cottonmouth is essentially inactive, lying
sometimes sometimes not, in shaded areas when the sun is
coiled,
shining brightly, and in the sunlight when the days are cool. They
are frequently to be found on the mud at the edge of a pool or slough,
but more often on some pile of emergence trash or vegetation. The
A Study of the Cottonmouth 37
allow one to approach within two or three feet. The larger indi-
viduals appear to be somewhat more wary and more easily alarmed
than the smaller ones.
Food and Feeding
Forty-two of the 167 snakes examined contained food. Siren
intermedia was the most abundant food item in both volume and
occurrence. Frogs of the genus Rana ranked second. Together, these
two items comprised almost two-thirds of the food of the snakes. The
other food items were distributed among the fishes, reptiles, and
other amphibians.
In captivity they take mice readily, but I have found no mammals
in wild specimens. This may well be due to the fact that small mam-
mals are rare in the swampy areas normally inhabited by the snakes.
On numerous occasions I have observed that the cottonmouth, in
contrast to the copperhead and rattler, frequently retains a grip on
animals struck. This is perhaps an adaptation to a semi-aquatic
existence, where it would be difficult to trail a wounded prey.
Although there is little doubt that a hungry snake would take
food whenever the opportunity presented itself, active foraging for
food begins in the late afternoon or early evening and continues well
into the night. Possibly those snakes whose foraging is not successful
continue throughout the night and into the next morning. In any
event, I have seen empty snakes foraging for food shortly after day-
break.
While swimming in search of food and the head and anterior two
or three inches of the body extend out of the water. The head is
bent forward, paralleling the surface of the water. When disturbed,
they lower the head and body to the water and swim rapidly away,
sometimes on the surface, sometimes, diving. As evidenced by what
they eat, they will take food under the water, on the surface, on land,,
and will even climb into vegetation for food.
snakes averaged 688 mm. in total length, with a range from 600 to
783 mm.
On September 3, 1953, 1 took an adult cottonmouth from a patch of
oak woods on a hillside at the north border of Murphy's Pond. With-
in a half -hour after capture, she gave birth to three 260 mm. young.
This observation, coupled with the facts that September small : in
young are absent from the swamp; in April small young are to be
found only about the periphery of the swamp adjacent to wooded
hillsides whereas adults are well scattered and in June both adults
;
and small young are well distributed throughout the swamp, indicates
that the young are born on wooded hillsides adjacent to the swamp,
apparently shortly before hibernation begins.
A total of 152 cottonmouths were collected in Murphy's Pond on
April 9, 1955, and April 17, 18, and 19, 1954. Measurements of the
total length of these specimens reveal that they fall into four rather
well defined size groups, bearing out a general impression of this
derived from field work. It is logical to conclude that in part, at least,
these size groups are age groups.
Nineteen of the specimens range from 260-298 mm. Fig. 1, A pre-
sents data on these specimens. These individuals were undoubtedly
born the previous fall, and are approximately 7-8 months old. During
this time they have grown about 25 mm. on the average; however,
most of their life to date has been spent in hibernation.
A Study of the Cottonmouth 39
the next twelve months some 45 mm. and the next twelve months
it is ;
Animal Associates
Fishes are exceedingly abundant in the areas occupied by the cot-
tonmouth. Certainly some of the fish provide food for the cotton-
mouth, and I strongly suspect that a large Amia calva, one of the
40 Bogei^ W. Barhour
Economic Status
From an economic standpoint, the cottonmouth in Kentucky is of
little importance, due in part to its relative scarcity except in isolated
areas, and in part to the fact that the habitat of the animals is in no
way fit for human habitation. True, they do eat a few bullfrogs,
but this does not materially influence the welfare of mankind. If the
snakes were a more aggressive they might inflict some damage
little