Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Researched Article 1
Researched Article 1
Researched Article 1
Christopher Thatcher
Professor Mooney
ENC 1102
30 March 2020
Serial killers are dangerous people that everyone is afraid of. The media will constantly
portray them as monsters who are poster childs of heartless evil. Serial killers are the worst
people in the world and the media writes about them in that tone. Previous research done when
talking about media portrayal of serial killers shows that the media uses very similar word
choices when talking about serial killers, all of which have a negative connotation attached to
them. They also choose specific visual representations when talking about certain serial killers
which I will discuss later in the article. As for previous research, I have discovered how serial
killers are portrayed in films and movies, how the rise of technology and shift to online
publications has changed the landscape of rhetoric, and ways serial killers can have an impact on
a community. I also discovered how these themes fit within the landscapes of rhetoric and how
the media uses specific discourse when talking about serial killers.
Downs describes rhetoric like gravity, in the sense that gravity is a set of principles that
explains and tries to predict how different types of matter interact with each other. Rhetoric is a
set of principles that describe and explain a lot about human communication, interaction, and
their experiences. Similarly, James Paul Gee defines discourse as “connected stretches of
language that discourse communities use every day to communicate with each other” (Gee 274).
The media uses these two essential concepts when producing stories to audiences about serial
killers and the way they portray them. I have always had a fascination with serial killers because
Thatcher 2
they are truly polarizing figures who have been portrayed in many different ways. The media has
either portrayed them as true monsters or characters of mystery in feature films and novels like
The Silence of the Lambs and American Psycho. Research has even been done talking about the
new rhetoric and scholarship of the new media such as movies and the creation of the internet
with online publications of journals and books. Some researchers have dug into how serial killers
commit their actions and how just their presence can create an environment of fear and terror
Bartels explains the aesthetics of how serial killers commit their weekly serial hunts for
victims. He also talks about how important it is to be educated about these weekly serial hunts in
order to trace their criminal history and the overall history of criminals. The main takeaway is
how the aesthetics of the perfect murder is a sublime of beauty to these serial killers, and that
most serial killers suffer from semiotic deformity. O’Connell and Grunder explore how a serial
killer creates an environment of fear and terror. Exploring how students left in the murder zone
of a serial killer suffered terrible emotinal and mental stress that it caused their academics to slip.
Cassuto also mentions the lore of serial killers. He notes that serial killers suffer from many
psychological disorders, causing them to turn into monsters that scare everyone. Cassuto’s article
doubles up with another major theme of my research, how serial killers are portrayed in novels
and films.
Cassuto explores how serial killers are portrayed in fictional circumstances. Looking at
some of the most famous fictional serial killers such as Hannibal Lector, he explains how they
are portrayed and what makes them so intriguing to read about. He notes that real life serial
killers also differ from real life serial killers, how they target different people and their ways of
killing those victims. Similarly, Allué’s article takes note of Lector and another famous serial
Thatcher 3
killer in fiction in Patrick Bateman. Talking about the stories of The Silence of the Lambs and
American Psycho, she talks about the differences of how serial killers can be portrayed. Stories
like Silence of the Lambs are stories that glamorise the killer. They are the main attraction of the
story, the characters readers focus on the most. Other stories like American Psycho portray the
killers as characters with no sources of aesthetic pleasure. Gibson talks about a feature french
film that portrays the serial killer as something completely different from Cassuto and Allué. He
mentions that the serial killer’s compulsion and repetition of the way he kills his victims fits the
mold of what the mainstream capitalist society looks for when watching movies about serial
killers. Film adaptations of serial killers talk about the final theme of my intended research, the
Cheryl E. Ball’s article explores the evolving world of the media with the creation of the
internet and the creation of digital rhetoric. She talks about how the new media uses audio and
videos along with written text to make new meaning. She notes that research has not really been
done on the rhetoric and scholarship of these online publications and tries to figure out what they
are and how they work. “This text demonstrates how multimodal elements and new media
strategies such as the enactment of the text through a timeline can help readers interpret
meanings made through modes that move beyond linear, print traditions.” (Bell 421).
With all the research done on how the media portrays serial killers in a fictional manner,
there is really a lack of research done on how the media portrays real life serial killers like Ted
Bundy, Jeffery Dahmer, and John Wayne Gacy. Providing research into that gap will help me
fully answer the question of how the media portrays serial killers. Noting that serial killers are
dangerous people, it is important to know how dangerous they are by reading how they are
portrayed in real life, not just the fictional world for our reading pleasure.
Thatcher 4
Previous research done on the portrayal as previously mentioned does focus on fictional
serial killers like Hannibal Lector, probably the most infamous fictional serial killer in our
culture. I will hope to fill a major gap in all of this research done which is how the media
portrays real life serial killers. The main purpose of this researched article is to explore how
some of the most notorious serial killers in the world such as Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy,
Jeffery Dahmer, and Harold Shipman are portrayed in the media, and how they impact our
During my research, I have found that the media has portrayed these serial killers in a
negative tone using common words such as cold hearted, evil, heartless, monsters, and poster
childs of recieving the death penalty. While analyzing these articles, I found that each article had
a different picture accompanied while telling the story of each serial killer, for example while
analyzing the Ted Bundy story all of the photos of him show him as a cunning, smart, and
innocent man which fits really well with his profile. Meanwhile, while analyzing the John
Wayne Gacy article, a photo used there showed the crime scene at his house which shows just
how much of a monster he is. Every article also tells the story of each serial killer differently,
which is interesting to note because it goes to show how each serial killer is differently portrayed
As for the structure of the article, I will begin by talking about the methods I used to
complete my research while noting common themes I identified throughout each article. I will
then talk about the results of my findings with an in depth analysis of how those results have
helped me answer my research question. Following noting the results, I will discuss why these
findings are important to my discourse community and how they match the findings of my
Thatcher 5
secondary sources. That will be followed by a conclusion of all the research I have done and why
Methods:
analysis of newspaper articles on four of the world’s most notorious serial killers. I started by
looking at news articles of Ted Bundy, Jeffery Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy, and Harold Shipman
just to get a basis of how media outlets wrote about each killer. To fully answer my research
question, I had to look for certain codes pertaining to the media portrayal of serial killers, and it
all started at looking for the negative words or phrases each author used about the killers to shed
a light on what kind of monsters these killers truly are. The next step was to look at any photos
used in each article to see how they match the persona of each killer and how the media views
them. The photos help bring the killers’ stories to light and help support the negativity each
author gives each killer. The last step of my primary data research talks about how each author
tells the story, looking at the rhetorical strategies they use to portray these killers. I was looking
if they were telling a very detailed story, a short story just detailing the actions of each killer,
using a lot of photos, using quotes from the killers or their attorneys, what kind of headlines they
were using, etc. Using these methods helped me produce great results that helped me answer my
Results:
With thorough analysis of my primary sources, I found three central codes that tie into
my secondary source frameworks established in my introduction. Those codes were the negative
words or phrases each author used to portray each killer, which is the ultimate way to see how
the media portrays serial killers. The next code was usage of photographs to help support the
Thatcher 6
negative phrases used by the authors and show that the photos of either the killer or crime scene
helps to portray the types of monsters each killer truly was. The final code was the storytelling of
each author about the killers, showcasing strategies each author used to portray the killers and
Coding Chart:
display, and
even retaining
parts for
consumption.”
The first killer to talk about is Ted Bundy. Ted Bundy is perhaps the most well known
serial killer in history. After analyzing the article, shown in Appendix A, this was the most
detailed article I analyzed because he had the most interesting path to being caught. Starting with
how the author tells his story, he begins with a quote from Ted Bundy describing himself. That
immediately grabs the attention of any reader, which is opening an article with impact. It then
details the first years of Bundy’s terror across the Pacific Northwest, which provides me
immediately with the fact that Ted Bundy was a sly, cunning, dangerous man. Noting that the
first real break in the case came when one woman escaped Bundy is a bold move that works
Thatcher 8
because it gives me as a reader a basis of knowledge to know how Ted Bundy impacted the
community he was residing in. Learning that he first didn’t fit the profile of a serial killer was
intriguing because Bundy was very secretive at first. The author then gets lax when talking about
the childhood of Bundy which was an interesting strategy to start with his first terror attacks than
to start telling the story of Bundy. Another interesting move by the author was how he detailed
the attacks that Bundy committed on these women, which really caught my eyes. Those
strategies help paint a picture of the heartless evil Ted Bundy truly was and how me made
Getting into the photos and negative phrases the author uses to describe Bundy are also
simply sensational when portraying Bundy as almost the devil himself. After reading the story of
Bundy, it is easy to see why he called himself one cold hearted person, because he played
everyone from his victims to his own wife. The use of phrases like the very definition of
heartless evil portray Bundy very well because he really was heartless because he murdered
women out of cold blood with no real remorse. Getting into visuals, it is easy to see why the
prominent picture of the article is a normal photo of Ted Bundy because of how secretive he was.
It took a while for authorities to finally tie Ted Bundy to the disappearances of women all over
the Pacific Northwest and that photo describes just how cunning Bundy was. He went to law
school, was married, all of the stuff normal people do, but Bundy was far from normal. Killing
The article on Harold Shipman was a bit different than that of Ted Bundy. The author
notes how there is a new documentary coming out about Harold Shipman and how it will detail
new stories about the monster he was. Harold Shipman was dubbed “Doctor Death” because he
was a doctor who murdered his patients, those typically older. The author starts by noting how
Thatcher 9
many victims Shipman killed noting that most of his victims were elderly women, and how he
would leave the world. That was by hanging himself in prison. The author then starts to detail the
life of Shipman noting how he saw his mother die of cancer when he was 17 which motivated
him to become a doctor. That starts to paint a picture of how he was kind of like Bundy, a normal
person who seemed incapable of committing such horrible actions, but that picture is quickly
turned into something else. The author quickly gets into the crime spree of Dr, Death which
started with forging prescriptions in 1975. When he opened his own practice in 1992, the author
notes how he developed his master plan. He became well known which allowed him to conceal
his true colors. The author details how he poisoned all of his victims, which makes his portrayal
as Dr. Death very true. Speaking of negative phrases, Dr. Death is the one used a lot by the
author in the article. It is also noted that he was Britain’s most notorious serial killer and the
Angel of Death. That phrase was the best one used because doctors are supposed to be helpful
and save lives not take lives from people who trust them. The visual in this article was an
interview with one of Shipman’s ex nurses in which she details how he seemed normal at first
but quickly revealed his true colors. That video paints Shipman as an evil person and helps me
John Wayne Gacy’s article was the shortest one I analyzed. The story told by the author
was one of horror which portrays Gacy as perhaps the worst serial killer in American history.
Instead of talking about Gacy’s actions or life, the author chose to tell the story of the
investigation into Gacy and the discovery they made of the victims he buried at his home in
Chicago. The author noted how one FBI agent described Gacy’s home as one of an odor of death
which goes to show just how dangerous Gacy was. He truly created an environment of fear that
made his neighbors squander in fear that they could be his next victims. Phrases like the
Thatcher 10
country’s worst serial killer and the poster child of the death penalty fit the mold of what the
author is doing to portray John Wayne Gacy. A monster with no remorse for human life, and as
Gacy mentioned himself, he thought that killing those young men was ridding society of bad
elements when he was the bad element of society. The visual with this article was Gacy’s home
being demolished by a bulldozer revealing the bodies of his victims. That visual helps the story
told by the article fit the monster persona Gacy gave himself. Showing Gacy himself would not
have helped portray him as much as a monster as the visual they used did. That photo helped
The article on Jeffery Dahmer is a story of insanity. The author portrays Dahmer as an
insane man who committed monstrous acts because of his neglected childhood. The story begins
with how Dahmer didn’t have much of a childhood who took up a hobby looking at animal
carcases. That neglected childhood led him to have dark thoughts and go down a dark path. The
author does a great job to satisfy the portrayal of Dahmer by detailing the horrific things he did
to the bodies of his victims, which would include creating a candle out of human skulls. The
author chose to detail the story of his second victim, which was probably the most horrific
murder he carried out. His magnum opus was how he decided to become a necrophiliac after
killing his victims, which was one of the negative phrases the author used to portray Dahmer.
The visual of Dahmer’s mugshots doesn’t provide much but what I can get from it, it pictures a
man crazed by dark thoughts but was remorseful for the actions he committed. While he was
truly a monster, showing remorse for his actions makes him a sliver less of a monster than the
Discussion:
Thatcher 11
All of these results allows me to fully answer my research question of how the media
portrays serial killers. As stated in the results, it can be seen that serial killers can be portrayed
the same but differently at the same time. Killers like Shipman and Bundy were normal people
who hid their true colors from the public until they slipped up one time. Dahmer was a monster
who turned to killing because of his neglected childhood. Gacy was just a monster who decided
to kill because he thought that society needed reforming by getting rid of “bad elements”. My
secondary research found that serial killers are even monsters in a fictional world but are either
liked or disliked by readers. All of these serial killers are disliked by the public because they
The articles by Cassuto and Gibson talk about the serial killers in The Silence of the
Lambs and American Psycho. Those killers are either the main attraction of the story or kill
because with no real reasons. John Wayne Gacy was that way because he killed his victims with
no real reason and no aesthetic pleasure which was mentioned by the Gibson article. All four of
the serial killers I mentioned and analyzed were glamorized by the media in negative fashions
O’Connell and Grunder explored how serial killers create environments of fear and can
impact academic performance of students. The story of Ted Bundy can perfectly fit the mold of
those findings because he attacked sorority girls of Chi Omega at Florida State. That greatly
impacted the students’ academic performance because they had to live in an environment of fear
because of what Ted Bundy had done. Harold Shipman scared his patients because he killed so
many of them, that he lost patients very fast when his story came to light. John Wayne Gacy
gave Chicago a scare when he murdered his victims, creating a dangerous environment and
making people fear for their lives, mainly the parents of young men.
Thatcher 12
Conclusion:
support how serial killers are portrayed, even if the killers are fictional, the storytelling methods
of each author helps support the claims of the new media rhetoric and how online publications
change the way we look at rhetoric. Serial killers are dangerous people who are not to be taken
for granted because they can cause so much harm even for people they don’t target. It is
important to know what they are capable of and how that can impact everyone from a normal
family to college students, just the presence of a serial killer can create fear among a community.
Serial killers hunt their victims during serial hunts which was proven by the article of Bartels and
The main takeaway should be that the media should continue to shine light on serial
killers and make the public aware of what they can do to impact our daily lives. The media
should continue to tell the entire story of the serial killers, not just their actions because
providing background information allows us to understand why they committed their actions.
My findings support what was said in the writing journal findings. All the writing journals talk
about how serial killers are polarizing figures but deep down are true roots of heartless evil, who
murder innocent people out of joy. All of these findings say that the discourse community of
serial killers is a scary but interesting one to talk about. Researching into these serial killers can
be a bit intimidating because you never know what you will find but the findings will always be
intriguing if you know what to look for. I believe some of the biggest questions raised is how did
these serial killers get the urge to kill, how they covered their tracks for so long, and how did the
public feel when they were finally brought to justice and captured by authorities. I think future
research can go anywhere when you talk about serial killers. Research like what is their
Thatcher 13
psychological build up, how their actions changed who they were as a person, anything about
serial killers is important as to learning about the criminal history of America and important
Appendix A: Article 1
Appendix A: Article 1
Thatcher 14
Appendix B: Article 2
Thatcher 15
Thatcher 16
Appendix C: Article 3
Thatcher 17
Appendix D: Article 4
Works Cited:
Thatcher 18
PSYCHO’ (1991).” Atlantis, vol. 24, no. 2, 2002, pp. 7–24. JSTOR,
Ball, Cheryl E. “Show, Not Tell: The Value of New Media Scholarship.” Computers and
Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 21, no. 4, 2004, pp.
History.” Amerikastudien / American Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, 1998, pp. 497–516. JSTOR,
Cassuto, Leonard. “The Cultural Work of Serial Killers.” Minnesota Review: A Journal
of Creative and Critical Writing, vol. 58–60, 2003, pp. 219–229. EBSCOhost, Project
Writing About Writing, edited by Doug Downs and Elizabeth Wardle, Bedford St. Martin,
Gee, Paul James. “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics”. Writing About Writing, edited
by Doug Downs and Elizabeth Wardle, Bedford St Martin, 2017, pp. 274-294.
FOR MEANING AND THE ABSENCE OF DESIRE IN ‘THE MINUS MAN AND
Film Studies, vol. 22, no. 2, 2013, pp. 120–142. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24411811.
Museum, Crime. “Jeffrey Dahmer: Crime Library: Serial Killers.” Crime Museum, 2018,
www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/jeffrey-dahmer/.
O’Connell, April, and Patricia Grunder. “The Emotional, Physical, and Academic Impact of
Living with Terror.” Community College Journal, vol. 74, no. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 24–29.
EBSCOhost.
Paoletti, Gabe. “‘The Very Definition Of Heartless Evil’: The Story Of Ted Bundy.” All That's
Smith, Sid. “John Wayne Gacy, the Country's Worst Serial Killer.” Chicagotribune.com,
gacy-story-story.html.
Sommerlad, Joe. “Who Was Harold Shipman and How Many of His Patients Did He Kill?” The
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/harold-shipman-doctor-death-serial-killer-gp-
mass-murderer-hyde-manchester-itv-documentary-a8323176.html.