Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/330263470

Harvard Business Review Analytic - Ducati

Research · January 2017


DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19212.36480/1

CITATIONS READS
0 4,546

1 author:

Maha Hanno
Golden Gate University
13 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Women Essential Green Economy View project

Volkswagen - Strategic Business Analysis View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Maha Hanno on 02 April 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Maha Hanno
Ducati

Introduction: Ducati has built its brand image as the sports bike manufacturer. Ducati has captured a huge portion of the
market in all four categories of the sports bike. They concentrate on dominating a niche Performance-driven motorcycles,
lighter frame, forward-leaning eat position, significant handling capabilities, on the other hand, luxury of comfort is
sacrificed. However, in the current business situation, Ducati is facing a high competition from its rival bike manufacturers
in heavy and cursing bike categories. Customer’s perception regarding repeat acquiring a bike from the same manufacturer
has changed since 2000. “Exhibit 16” shows that customers of Harley-Davidson and BMW are more interested in buying
bikes from them repeatedly, which is increasing the competition for Ducati to retain its current customers. Ducati is showing
a steady growth and profits in its relevant market, but it is not enough to sustain in the industry for a longer period. Hence,
the main issues are potential stagnant growth for the company. Should Ducati enter the cruiser market? Will entering the
cruiser segment, and broadening Ducati's traditional niche, help them sustain the profitable growth of the organization?
Strategic position: Ducati has developed a potent brand image as well as gained a reputation for technological superiority
and performance. While the company’s engineers have a reputation for excellent performance motorcycles, they have also
demonstrated an ability to develop successful motorcycles in other sub-segments of the market, such as the Monster in the
Naked-Sport segment. In addition, Ducati’s location in the Bologna district gives it access to a very large pool of motorcycle
component suppliers; the company has shown an ability to coordinate its supply chain in a manner that gives it flexibility
and control over the quality of components. Ducati’s high level of outsourcing its components has allowed the company to
allocate more resources towards building and enforcing its competitive advantages (brand, management, R&D, etc.). During
the turnaround, Minoli succeeded in bringing in a new management team that was, and still, is innovative, flexible and
creative. Compared to its competitors Ducati has shown that it has a positive attitude towards change, and the fact that the
turnaround program was successful has probably made the company more willing to adopt new strategies. The strength of
Ducati’s brand results in high customer loyalty, which is manifested in a high percentage of repeat purchase intentions. The
fact that Japanese manufacturers do not manage to achieve the same level of customer loyalty provides Ducati with a clear
opportunity to poach customers from these companies. Through Porter’s framework, it is apparent that there is a clear
distinction between the global and European cruiser markets. Globally, cruiser sales appear to be brand rather than attribute
driven. However, a company that is already established in the motorcycle industry (but not in the same segment) may be
able to harness its ownership advantages to facilitate entry into the cruiser market at a relatively lower cost than an entirely
new firm, as it would already have elements of the infrastructure and knowledge capital needed to facilitate its entry into the
cruiser market.
Conclusion: The turnaround program allowed Ducati to concentrate on its core competencies such as technology and R&D,
as well as create new ones (brand, management abilities and an efficient value chain). The SWOT clearly demonstrates that
Ducati could use its strengths in order to capitalize on the relatively low customer loyalty of its Japanese competitors. Using
Below analysis (PESTEL, Porter’s 5 forces, and SWOT) and strategic analysis it can be seen that no single manufacturer
has been able to harness a majority market share of the European heavyweight motorcycle market. This can be attributed to
the fact that the companies’ strategies are either brand driven or product driven. Harley Davidson’s (the global leader) global
strategy of brand driven sales seems to have failed it in Europe; while through their technological excellence Japanese
manufacturers have been able to gain significant market share in Europe, none of them emerges as a clear market leader. A
preliminary assessment of the heavyweight segment has shown that it is growing rapidly, thus providing Ducati with an
opportunity to increase sales by diversifying into new segments of the market. Furthermore, as the case study has
demonstrated, the apparent dissatisfaction of European customers with Harley’s cruisers could provide Ducati with the
impetus for entering the cruiser market.

Recommendation: Based on the above observations, it appears that Ducati might enter the cruiser market with reasonable
degree of success. It is recommended that the company should conduct a detailed survey of the cruiser market in order to
ascertain the degree of acceptance of a Ducati cruiser as well as a complete cost-benefit analysis, given the large investment
(€43 million) that would be involved in diversifying. However, should the company decide to go ahead with the development
of a cruiser, the management should be aware of the certain pitfalls that might emerge. Firstly, the company faces the threat
of diluting its brand attributes by moving into a non-sporting segment. Secondly, there is the threat of destabilization as a
result of diversifying so soon after the turnaround. The company might prevent these by creating a clear separation between
the sporting and cruiser segments by advertising and possibly distributing through different channels. In addition, Ducati
must constantly reiterate the fact that the cruiser runs on a high-performance Ducati engine. By continuing to further their
technologically advanced designs and manufacturing methods, Ducati can maintain its success level in the industry. The
search for alternative fuel sources has produced an environment of uncertainty. Regardless of the next energy source, Ducati
must be able to maintain its focus on performance cycles. As long as Ducati maintains its niche and profitability, they must
maintain their focus on producing lightweight sports bikes to differentiate themselves and maintain their brand image.

1|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

References:
Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17 (1). pp. 99-120
Daft, R. (1983) Organisation theory and design. New York: West.
Gardinder M., (2011) "Ducati Motorcycle History: History of Ducati."
http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/history-ducati-motorcycle.html.
Giovanni G., (2002). Ducati. HBS No. 9-701-132. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Greenberg, K (2002). Advertising; Ducati Motor Hitches Up 'Real Riders': BRANDWEEK
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008) Exploring Corporate Strategy. 8th Edn. London: FT Prentice Hall.
Juga, J. (1999) ‘Generic capabilities: combining positional and resource-based views for strategic advantage’. Journal
of Strategic Marketing [online]. 7(1). pp. 3-18. Available at:
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4220287&site=ehost-live
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (2005) Strategy Safari: a guided tour through the wilds of Strategic
Management. 1st edn. NewYork: Free Press.
Montano G. (2011) "Ducati." Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ducati
Nauman, M., (2004) California Dream; For Italian Bike Maker, Being In This State Is Golden, San Jose Mercury
News (California), 2004 Final Edition; Pg. 1H, 1074 Mercury News
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995) The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics
of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Porter, E.M. (2004) Competitive Advantage. NewYork: Free Press.
Stalk, G., Evans, P., & Shulman, L. (1992). Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy [online].
Harvard Business Review. 70(2).
Wit, B. D. & Meyer, R. (2004) Strategy: Process, Content, Context. 3rd Edn. London: Thomson Learning.

Exhibits:

• SWOT Analysis
• Porter’s 5 forces model
• PESTEL Analysis
• Ducati profitability in industry
• Differentiation and Positioning strategy of Ducati
• Ducati and major competitors
• Resources of Ducati
• Exhibit 16 “European data for major competitors.”

2|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

SWOT Analysis:
Strengths Weaknesses
Technical Excellence Narrow Target Audience
Efficient Value Chain ensure quality Polarized sales
Strong Brand/ Brand loyalty Low economies of scale
Location Advantages Sparse Dealer Network
Effective management Limited Growth since yr. 2000
Strategic Alliances Marketing
R&D Reliance on suppliers
L-Twin engine Reached peak of turnaround
Opportunities Threats
Fast growing segment (Other segments in the market) Low price of competitors
Customers of Japanese motorcycles have low brand Competitors enjoy lower costs
loyalty Competitors have high economies of scale and low
Reduction in international trade barriers cost of capital
Strong competitors like Harley Davidson
Porter’s 5 forces model:
• Industry Competitors :Harley, BMW, Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki
• Handful of players but all quite well established and all vying for customers
based on their capabilities
Competitive rivalry (Medium): • Strong brand identity for Harley models
• Agreement between Honda and Yamaha about parts transport
• Low exit barriers
• Differentiation
• Brand loyalty
• Wide variety of individuals with equally different tastes and reasons for
buying.
Bargaining power of buyers • Knee down, Fast, Urban, Weekend, Highway, Easy and Undecided riders.
(Medium): • Each buyer differed by age, income, education, gender
• Women new customer base
• High switching costs, brand loyalty, differentiation
• Many suppliers, low input differentiation
• Low switching costs
Bargaining power of suppliers • Majority supplier belongs to Emilian District
(Low): • Two sources available for each part and alternative available
• Mostly short term contracts except few long term suppliers of strategic
importance
• Number of motorcycles manufactures decreasing
• Threat not significant as already many established players in the market and
required a significant initial network, resources and investment
Threat of new entrants (Low):
• High capital expenditures
• Highly differentiated products already in industry
• Brand loyalty and high switching costs
• In sports sub segment Naked, Harley Buell model was a threat. BMW also
competed in sport sub segment Naked
• Japanese companies Honda, Kawasaki, Suzuki, and Yamaha had
Threat of substitutes (Low): substitutable products
• Differing audience of cars
• Motorcycle and brand loyalty
• High switching costs

3|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

Threat of
Substitutes
Low threat from
Cars, as consumer likely to have one
in addition. Low threat from other
types of motorcycles, as for
different markets.

Competition Bargaining Power


Bargaining Power
Oligopoly, with Harley Davidson as of Buyers
of Suppliers main threat (48.1% of US market share), Power is high due to branding and loyal
Power may be low within the particularly in terms of brand. customer base, so Harley buyers
market, due to Harley’s Other competitors are unlikely to switch, as costs are too high.
dominance. Triumph, Yamaha, Honda New entrants unable to touch Harley’s
High power with regard to new (on price/technology) licensees, as they are locked in dealer
entrants, due to high switching & BMW networks
costs

Threat from
New Entrants
Dominance and strength of Harley brand
suggests high entry barriers, so low threat
from new entrants. No dominating brand
in Europe means here threat from
new entrants higher in Europe

Porter’s Five Forces (1979), (1980), and (1985)


in analysing the cruiser market
Figure 1.

4|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

Macro environment “PESTEL framework”


(Johnson et al, 2008).

Political Economic
Not clear from the case but most Not comes explicitly from the case
of countries like USA, UK, Japan, but most of the economies that
Italy, France, Germany is quite company was mainly operating in
stable and company mainly low growth mature markets and
operated in developed countries. open economies.

Legal Technological
• Fuel efficient and high
Free markets, not much
performance engines
restriction from the
• Improvement in Paint,
governments except safety Trim, Chrome, Exhaust
standards (In author’s view) pipe shaping
• Electronic Components
• CAD & CNC

Environmental Social

Green issues (in author’s • Women becoming


oriented towards biking
view)
• Different tastes and
lifestyle , and changing
at faster rate

5|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

Ducati profitability in industry:

6|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

Ducati's Relevant Market (Sports Niche)

Differentiation and Positioning strategy of Ducati :

Knee down Riders Performance

Riders
Urban Riders
Ducati

Fast Riders

Japanese
Companies Life Style
Function
Easy
High way lovers
Riders

Harley

Davidson
Comfort

(This diagram does not represent any scale but only the positioning of Ducati, Harley Davidson and Japanese
Motorcycle companies.)
It also appears from the case that Ducati was aware of its environment and Minoli and his team did value chain
analysis to understand where in the companies lie value and try to match that value in a particular market segment.

7|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

Ducati and major competitors:

Ducati: Major competitors:


BMW:
Different model for different purposes Leader of technological advances
Represents the thoughts and feelings that come with Reliability and safety
riding a motorcycle Honda:
Most produced
Harley-Davidson:
Lifestyle brand
Triumph
Durability, virtually unbreakable
Yamaha:
Fewer bikes sold in the USA
Focuses on other products
Suzuki:
Concentrates on parts rather than the whole vehicle
Honda and Yamaha:
Jointly transport motorcycles and spare parts
Estimated savings of 30% on transportation costs
Kawasaki and Suzuki:
Plan to also jointly transport motorcycles and spare parts

Resources of Ducati:

Resources and competencies Identified Culture


Desmodromic Distribution System
Passion for Races
L-Twin Engine
Unique Beautiful Performance Bikes,Stress on Asthetics
Tubular Trestle Frame
Top Notch Engineering
Unique Sound
Purists
Beautiful, sophisticated powerful bikes
Passion for speed, performance, innovation
Culture supporting sports bike attributes
In explicit and implicit knowledge

Resources of
Ducati

Diagnosis of Resources Managing Knowledge, building


culture and building competencies
Bench Marking Harley Davidson Business and
Model of distribution and value chain analysis Museum building
Mapping various activites and value delivered Ducati Stores, 'History Wall' (pp. 867)
Coordination among R&D, Product development, Racing
division and Marketing department
Ducati Owners club, Events, Ducati.com

8|Page
Maha Hanno
Ducati

9|Page

View publication stats

You might also like