Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Depressing Effect of Clay Minerals On The Floatability of Chalcopyrite
The Depressing Effect of Clay Minerals On The Floatability of Chalcopyrite
An International Journal
To cite this article: Lina Uribe, Leopoldo Gutierrez & Oscar Jerez (2016): The depressing
effect of clay minerals on the floatability of chalcopyrite, Mineral Processing and Extractive
Metallurgy Review, DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2016.1168419
Download by: [Library Services City University London] Date: 23 March 2016, At: 16:58
The depressing effect of clay minerals on the
floatability of chalcopyrite
Lina Uribe a, Leopoldo Gutierrez a,*, and Oscar Jerez b
a
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Universidad de Concepcion, Edmundo Larenas 285,
t
ip
Concepcion, Chile
b
Institute for Applied Economic Geology (GEA), Universidad de Concepcion, Casilla 160-C,
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Concepción, Chile
*
Corresponding author: Tel. 56-41-2204956; fax: 56-41-2243418; lgutierrezb@udec.cl
us
ABSTRACT
an
In this work, the depressing effect of clay minerals on the floatability of chalcopyrite using PAX
as collector was assessed through induction time and settling-turbidity measurements. The data
M
obtained using these two techniques were correlated with the results of micro-flotation tests
carried out to study the effect of kaolinite and smectite particles on the floatability of
ed
chalcopyrite at pH 9, and 10. The results indicate that these techniques can be confidently used to
examine interactions between clay minerals and chalcopyrite, and their possible consequences on
pt
the flotation process. In particular, the use of settling-turbidity measurements to evaluate slime
ce
coating seems to be a useful technique that could be applied to study heterocoagulation in other
mineral systems. It was found that the depressing effect of clay minerals was stronger at pH 10
Ac
which was correlated to a possible effect of Ca2+ from lime on the process of coagulation
between clay minerals and chalcopyrite. Coating of bubbles with clays was detected in this work
by visual observations and it is proposed as a mechanism that might explain the depressing effect
1
of clays on the floatability of chalcopyrite. Further research is needed to propose a mechanism
t
Introduction
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Processing of low grade ores rich in problematic species such as phyllosilicates has become more
us
common in the copper mining industry, and represents one of the main challenges today in the
field of mineral processing. In particular, clay minerals are frequently found in copper ores in
an
high concentrations (Kelm et al., 2013; Zhao and Peng, 2012). One of the most important
characteristic of clay mineral particles is their anisotropic surface properties. This results in the
M
surface charge that is different on the faces and edges (Johnson et al., 1998). In addition to this,
expandable clay mineral platelets usually exhibit a significant cation exchange capacity (CEC)
ed
(Lagaly and Ziesmer, 2003). Due to their complex and heterogeneous nature, and the presence of
various types of active site on their surfaces, clay mineral particles can interact and attach to
pt
particles of valuable minerals. Kaolinite and smectite (montmorillonite) are two typical clay
ce
minerals found in copper porphyry deposits (Kelm et al., 2013; Zhao and Peng, 2012). Kaolinite
has two different surfaces generated during particle breakage, i.e., the basal silica-like and the
Ac
alumina-like faces (Hu et al., 2005, Johnson et al., 1998; Bickmore et al., 2002; Brady et al.,
1992). The silica-like faces carry a negative charge with an iep of around 2, while the alumina-
hydroxyl groups with iep values around 7.0 (Johnson et al., 1998; Hu et al., 2005; Angove et al.,
2
1997; Williams and Williams, 1978; Ran and Melton, 1977). Montmorillonite belongs to the 2:1
layer clay minerals with a pyrophyllite type alumino-silicate structure and is part of the clay sub-
composed of three layers where one octahedral aluminum–oxygen layer is sandwiched between
t
ip
two tetrahedral silicon–oxygen layers (Vanerek et al., 2006; Gungor, 2000). Montmorillonite
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
particles can also be modeled as laminar particles with faces and edges with the basal silica-like
cr
layers carrying a permanent negative charge and the edges charge depending on pH (McFarlane
us
et al., 2005). Distinctive properties of sodium montmorillonite dispersions are swelling, low
an
dependence of c K with the solids content (Lagaly and Ziesmer, 2003).
M
Some mechanisms have been suggested to explain the adverse effect of the presence of clay
minerals on the process of flotation of copper sulfide ores, i.e., slime coatings, coating of bubbles
ed
with clay particles, high reagent consumption (reagents uptake), and changes in froth stability
and pulp rheology. The phenomenon referred to as slime coating has been proposed to be one of
pt
the main mechanisms that negatively affect the efficiency of froth flotation (Fornasiero and
Ralston, 2005; Peng and Zhao, 2011; Zhao and Peng, 2012; Holuszko et al., 2008; Liu et al.,
ce
2002). Slime coating consists in the deposition of colloidal clay particles on the surfaces of larger
particles of valuable minerals. Then, the presence of the colloidal particles of clay minerals on
Ac
the surfaces of the valuable particles induces hydrophilicity and the efficiency of the flotation
process is reduced. The magnitude of slime coating depends on the difference in the surface
charge of the clay and valuable particles (as indicated by the DLVO theory).
3
Some methods to assess slime coating were previously proposed. For example, Liu et al. (2002)
potential distributions. This technique was based on the fact that for a single component
suspension (e.g., clay or bitumen) the zeta potential distribution should display a single modal
t
ip
pattern, but when the two components are in suspension the distribution will show either one or
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
two distribution peaks, depending whether the components interact with each other or not,
cr
respectively. This interesting method is carried out under mixing/hydrodynamic conditions that
us
are more similar to those found in the real flotation process. However, some studies showed that
its application to the study of heterocoagulation between clay minerals and chalcopyrite is
an
difficult as the zeta potential distributions of these individual minerals overlaps (Forbes, 2014).
Other researchers have used contact angle measurements to assess the effect of slime coating on
M
coal wettability (Jowett et al., 1956) and AFM (Liu et al., 2003), but they need to be carried out
under very quiescent conditions which may not represent the real situation observed in the
ed
flotation process.
pt
In this work, the negative effect of clay minerals on the floatability of chalcopyrite using PAX as
heterocoagulation between clay minerals and chalcopyrite. The results obtained using these two
techniques are correlated with micro-flotation data. In particular, the effect of kaolinite and
Ac
4
Materials and methods
t
Samples of kaolinite and smectite were provided by the Clay Minerals Society Source clays.
ip
These samples were analyzed by XRD using a Bruker D4-Endeavor operated with Ni-filtered Cu
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
radiation (Chipera and Bish, 2001). Figure 1 and Table 1 show the XRD spectra and data of the
us
quantitative analysis respectively. Table 1 also summarizes the results of cation exchange
capacity CEC and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller BET (Kelm and Helle, 2005) surface area for both
an
types of clays. The cation exchange capacities (CEC) were determined using ammonium acetate
at pH 7 as described by Skinner et al. (2001). As it was expected the CEC value of the smectite
M
sample was significantly higher than that of kaolinite. Besides, the smectite sample contained
around 75% of montmorillonite which was the main component of this clay sample.
ed
Figure 2 shows SEM (Jeol JSM-6380) pictures of the clay minerals samples used in this work.
pt
From the picture of kaolinite (Figure 2-A), it can be seen that the particle size of this sample was
finer than 4-5 microns with a rather random textural arrangement. It has to be noted that these 4-
ce
5 micron clay particles are stacks of sheets 7 angstrom thick (Mitchell, 1993, pp 27), so when
these particles enter into an aqueous medium, they can detach from another, and depending on
Ac
solution and shearing, delamination of these particles into smaller stacks or even individual
sheets may occur. This textural pattern can be related to shearing on the weak bonds existing
between the interlayers 1:1 dominated by Van der Waals forces (Mitchell, 1993) which enhances
the delamination process (Nelson and Miller, 1992), and as a result a rather random micro-
5
structure in aqueous media is generated. The electrical neutrality of the unit layers of the
particles of kaolinite also defines the low CEC of this type of clay mineral. The situation is
different in the case of the smectite sample (Figure 2-B). In this case the textural arrangement is
more consistent and homogeneous than in the case of the kaolinite sample. This behavior can be
t
ip
explained by the higher stability of the smectite lattice and the larger charge differences existing
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
between the sheets. In aqueous media the type and concentration of cations, diffusion
cr
phenomena, and pH modify the balance of electrical charges existing between the sheets which
us
results in expansion or swelling of the clay mineral particles (Mitchell, 1993).
The study was carried out using a highly pure sample of chalcopyrite which was prepared from
an
mineralized rock specimens obtained from a mine located in northern Chile. The sample used in
M
the experiments was prepared by hand-grinding pure crystals of this mineral in a mortar and
pestle ceramic grinder. Further purification was carried out using a magnetic separator to remove
ed
some magnetic impurities. Table 2 shows the chemical and XRD mineralogical composition of
the sample. It can be seen that the chalcopyrite content was 97.1 % with minor contents of pyrite,
pt
molybdenite and quartz. The chalcopyrite sample was then washed with acetone and distilled
water in order to remove some organic contaminants that could have potentially been
ce
incorporated to the sample during the process of handling and preparation. Additionally, in order
to keep oxidation at minimum, the samples were stored in a freezer in sealed plastic bags
Ac
previously blown with nitrogen, at a temperature of about 1 °C (Ekmekci and Demirel, 1997;
6
It is important to point out that sample preparation of sulfide minerals strongly depend on the
grinding conditions, which is definitely important and to a large extent determine the flotation
properties of sulfides (Heyes and Trahar, 1979). These conditions also depend on the type of
grinding media and whether they are made of iron, steel, stainless steel or ceramic (Bruckard et
t
ip
al., 2011). It is because of this reason that the use of freshly ground ore samples of metal sulfides
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
has been recommended when doing research on flotation of these types of minerals (Wark,
cr
1938). In this work the objective was to study the effect of clay minerals on the floatability of
us
pure chalcopyrite, and it was important to use samples prepared under the same conditions. To
produce identical 1 gram samples of chalcopyrite for the micro-flotation is something very
an
difficult by doing wet grinding, and that is why dry crushing/grinding, and the samples storage
under nitrogen was a reasonable choice. However, the authors recognize that the surface
M
properties of chalcopyrite will change if grinding is carried out in air or water (Todd et al., 2003),
and the effect of surface oxidation on the interaction of chalcopyrite with clay minerals particles
ed
Particle size analyses were done in a Sympatec's HELOS-Rodos laser diffraction system.
Figure 3 shows the particle size distributions of samples of kaolinite, smectite, and chalcopyrite.
ce
The measured mean particle sizes for ground kaolinite and smectite were 4.4 and 3.9 microns
respectively with top size values of 21 microns for kaolinite and 19 microns for the smectite
Ac
sample. Chalcopyrite sample was in the size range 40 to 210 microns with a mean particle size of
113 microns.
7
Potassium amyl xanthate (PAX), and methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) were used as
collector and frother respectively. Distilled water of electrical conductivity of 21.5 µS/cm was
used in all the experiments. pH was adjusted using lime in all the tests.
t
Procedures
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Micro-flotation
us
The floatability of chalcopyrite was evaluated through micro-flotation tests that were carried out
in a 150 mL Patridge and Smith glass cell using nitrogen (N 2 ) at a flowrate of 20 mL/min. The
an
flotation feed was prepared mixing 1 gram of chalcopyrite with different amounts of fine
particles of kaolinite/smectite, i.e., 0, 45, 60, 75, and 150 mg of clay. Considering that the
M
volume of the micro-flotation cell was 150 mL, the masses of clay minerals used in these
experiments corresponded to concentrations of 0, 200, 400, 500, and 1,000 mg/L. The flotation
ed
feed was then mixed with 100 mL of a 0.01 M sodium chloride (NaCl) background solution, and
conditioned at the required pH for 3 minutes. These experiments were carried out at values of pH
pt
of 9 and 10 in order to match typical pH values found in the process of rougher flotation of
ce
copper ores. After 3 minutes of conditioning, PAX and MIBC were added at concentrations of
40 and 25 ppm respectively (based on the 150 mL of the micro-flotation cell), and conditioned
Ac
for 5 more minutes at the previously established value of pH. Additional solution was then added
to complete the 150 mL needed in the micro-flotation glass cell. Finally, the gas valve was
opened to start the process of flotation which was carried out for 2 minutes, scraping the froth off
every 10 seconds. The pulp level in the micro-flotation cell was kept constant by adding a
8
background solution prepared at the same composition and pH of the original solution.
Concentrates and tailings were then sieved using a 400 mesh sieve to remove the particles of clay
minerals, and to measure the amount of sample chalcopyrite existing in each of the streams.
Finally, the samples were dried in an oven set at 105°C for 5 hours and the solids flotation yield
t
ip
was calculated dividing the mass of chalcopyrite in the concentrate by the mass of chalcopyrite
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
in concentrate plus tailings. All the tests were conducted in triplicates thus the results presented
cr
in this paper are average values.
us
Induction time measurements
an
Induction time measurements were conducted using the procedure described by Castro et al.
(2014) and the induction time meter built by University of Alberta. According to this procedure a
M
fresh bubble held on a capillary is pushed downward through a solution so that it is kept in
contact with a bed of particles for a measured and controlled contact time (Figure 4, stages 1 and
ed
2). Then, the bubble is lifted upwards to its initial position and observed through a microscope in
order to determine whether attachment occurred during the contact time or not (Figure 4, stage
pt
3). This process is repeated 10 times at different positions on the particles bed and the
ce
different values and the procedure is repeated again in each case. The final result of the test is a
Ac
plot of percentages of successful contacts (N sc ) versus the measured contact time (t c ). In this
work, the induction time was obtained by determining the contact time at which 50 % of the
contacts were successful. The experimental data were fitted using Equation 1.
9
N sc = k1 (1 − Exp(− k 2tc K3 )) (1)
The beds of particles were prepared by mixing 3 grams of chalcopyrite with 30 mL of a 0.01 M
t
ip
NaCl background solution containing 40 ppm of PAX. Immediately after, fine particles of
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
kaolinite/smectite were added at concentrations of 0, 300, 400, 500, and 1,000 mg of clay per
cr
liter of background solution. Then, the pH was adjusted to the required value (pH 9 and 10) and
us
the slurry was conditioned for 12 minutes, after which it was transferred to a 15 mL cell in order
to start the induction time measurements. No frother was added in these experiments and air was
an
used to generate the bubbles. All these experiments were conducted in duplicates thus the results
chalcopyrite
pt
In this work, a method is proposed to assess the extent of the attachment between clay minerals
and particles of chalcopyrite. The method is described in Figure 5, and it is based on the
ce
assumption that if heterocoagulation between chalcopyrite and clay particles takes place during
the mixing period, and then the resulting suspension is left to settle in a cylinder for a given time,
Ac
coarse particles of chalcopyrite (p80 around 100 microns) will settle and carry clay minerals
attached to them. As a result, it is expected that for a suspension of clay minerals and
chalcopyrite, turbidity of the upper part of the suspension, T 2 in Figure 5, will decrease in
comparison with the suspension that is prepared using only clay minerals particles, T 1 in Figure
10
5. Then, the extent of slime coating can be quantified by measuring T 1 -T 2 . If this number is near
zero then it could be concluded that interactions between clay minerals and chalcopyrite are
negligible.
In this work the preparation of suspensions was carried out by mixing 0.8 grams of chalcopyrite
t
ip
and 120 mg of kaolinite/smectite, with 120 mL of a 0.01 M NaCl background solution
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
containing 40 ppm of PAX and 25 ppm of MIBC. It has to be noted that in these tests the
concentration of clay mineral particles was 1000 mg of clay per liter of solution, which is the
us
maximum clay concentration tested in the micro-flotation tests. After this, the suspensions were
conditioned for 3 minutes under controlled mixing conditions which was ensured by using the
an
same magnetic stirrer and plate for all the tests. Then, suspensions were placed in a 100 mL
M
graduated cylinder where they were left to settle for 5 minutes. After that, a 10 mL aliquot was
withdrawn using a syringe from a section positioned at 2/3 the height of the cylinder and tested
ed
for turbidity. Turbidity measurements were performed using a portable turbidimeter Orbeco
TB200 whose maximum reading was 999 NTU. In order to correlate this information with the
pt
floatability data, all these tests were performed at the same conditions used during the micro-
flotation experiments.
ce
Ac
11
Results and discussion
Micro-flotation
t
Figure 6 shows results of micro-flotation experiments performed with chalcopyrite in the
ip
presence of different concentrations of kaolinite and smectite, respectively. It can be seen that the
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
presence of kaolinite and smectite negatively affects the recovery of chalcopyrite at both pH
us
values. Clay minerals can depress chalcopyrite through slime coating phenomena which involves
coagulation of clay on chalcopyrite. All these mechanisms are affected by the surface properties
an
of chalcopyrite, clays, and bubbles. All of them being negatively charged at pH levels above 9
(Leja, 1982; Healy, 1976; Johnson et al., 1998; McFarlane et al., 2005; Elmahdy et al., 2008;
M
Laskowski et al., 1989). It is known that Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions coagulate clay suspensions
(O´Gorman and Kitchener, 1974; Wright and Kitchener, 1976; Sworska et al., 2000) and in the
ed
system containing chalcopyrite particles it may be responsible for the coagulation of the clay
particles onto chalcopyrite. Figure 6 shows that this mechanism is possible. This explanation is
pt
consistent with the fact that the observed depressing effect of clays on chalcopyrite was slightly
ce
stronger at pH 10 where the concentration of calcium ions is higher since lime was used to adjust
pH. It was shown that the presence of calcium enhanced the attachment of montmorillonite to
Ac
bitumen leading to low bitumen recoveries (Liu et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2004). It was also
reported that the presence of Ca2+ ions in solution induces heterocoagulation between silica and
molybdenite (Tabares et al., 2006; Raghavan and Hsu, 1984). Figure 6 shows that recovery of
chalcopyrite in the absence of clays is slightly lower at pH 10, but the difference falls into the
12
experimental error. It has to be noted that although Table 1 shows that kaolinite and smectite
samples display different CEC and BET values, the extent of the depressing effect of both clays
on the floatability of chalcopyrite is similar. The study of the correlation between the structural
properties of clays and flotation of sulfide minerals is something that deserves further studies.
t
ip
As was explained in the procedures, the chalcopyrite sample used in this work was prepared by
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
manual crushing/grinding and protected from oxidation under nitrogen. It is well known that the
surface properties of sulfide minerals change whether grinding is carried out using wet or dry
us
grinding. During wet grinding the response of sulfide minerals can be affected by the presence of
oxyhydroxide species dissolved from the mineral or grinding media, and the formation of
an
sulphoxy species such as SO, SO 2 , SO 3 and SO 4 (Bruckard et al., 2011; Owusu et al., 2014).
M
Todd et al. (2003) studied the type of species that are formed on the surface of chalcopyrite after
oxidation under atmospheric and aqueous conditions. They found that in aqueous solutions at
ed
high pH iron oxyhydroxide species similar to goethite are formed on the surface of chalcopyrite
and the soluble copper oxidation products are leached and dissolved in water. On the other hand
pt
when chalcopyrite is subjected to air oxidation, iron (III) oxyhydroxide species and copper
oxidation products such as sulfates are present in contrast to the situation observed in aqueous
ce
solutions. It is proposed by Todd et al. (2003) that a complex oxidized surface consisting of a
mixture of CuO, FeOOH, copper and/or ferric iron sulfates, and possibly Cu 2 O and/or Cu 2 S
Ac
surface species may be formed. All the differences in the behavior of the surface properties of
chalcopyrite observed when it is ground using wet and dry procedures can affect the interactions
between clay mineral particles and chalcopyrite, and it is a subject that needs further
investigation. The effect of surface oxidation on the interactions between clay minerals and
13
chalcopyrite is out of the scope of this paper and all the results presented in this work were
Induction time
t
ip
The results of the induction time measurements are shown in Figure 7. It can be seen that without
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
clay minerals (Figure 7(a)), the induction time values increase from 45.4 to 68.3 ms as pH is
cr
increased from 9.0 to 10.0. Figure 7(b) also shows the effect of clay minerals on the induction
us
time values as a function of the concentration of kaolinite, and smectite at pH 9, and 10. It has to
be noted that the error bars in this figure represent the standard deviation of two induction time
an
measurements performed at the same conditions (duplicates). The figure indicates that at a given
pH the induction time values increase with the additions of higher amounts of kaolinite and
M
smectite. The fact that the induction time values increase in the presence of clay mineral particles
associated to lower recoveries in the micro-flotation tests, which is exactly what can be observed
pt
in Figure 6 that indicates a loss of chalcopyrite floatability as clay minerals particles are added to
ce
the suspension. It is also interesting to examine the relationship between pH and the effect of
clay minerals on the induction times presented in Figure 7(b). The increase of the induction time
Ac
values as a result of clay additions is more pronounced at pH 10 which is in good agreement with
the micro-flotation results presented in Figures 6 that indicate that the depressing effect of fine
14
Some efforts were also made in this work to look for evidence of the occurrence of the coating of
air bubbles with fine clays. To achieve this objective, pictures of the bubbles obtained in the
presence of clays were taken after the induction time tests which were afterwards studied in
order to see if fine particles actually attached to the bubbles or not. Figure 8 shows two examples
t
ip
of these pictures. The images indicate that fine clay mineral particles coat the bubbles in both
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cases. This coating is expected to hinder the process of bubble-particle adhesion, leading to
cr
higher induction times and lower recoveries. This experimental observation indicates that the
us
mechanism of coating of bubbles by fine clays has to be considered as a possible cause to
explain the depressing effect of fine clay particles on the floatability of copper sulfides. The
an
interactions between clays and bubbles may be related to some degree of hydrophobicity of the
clay mineral particles which was previously reported (Sadda et al., 1995). However, a fully
M
explanation of this phenomenon is still needed.
ed
chalcopyrite
pt
Heterocoagulation between clay minerals and chalcopyrite was assessed in this work through
ce
settling-turbidity tests. Figure 9 shows the results of the tests at different pH values. It can be
seen that turbidity values were lower in the presence of chalcopyrite which can be considered as
Ac
interesting to note that the differences of turbidity between suspensions prepared with and
without chalcopyrite were larger at pH 10, which indicates that slime coating increased with
increasing Ca2+ concentration (pH). These results are in good correlation with the reduction of
15
chalcopyrite floatability (Figure 6) and increase of induction time values (Figure 7) achieved in
the presence of clay minerals. The settling turbidity measurements indicate that the slime coating
phenomenon is a mechanism that could explain the depressing effect of clay minerals on the
floatability of chalcopyrite.
t
ip
Additional turbidity tests were carried out with coarse quartz particles (-210 + 20 microns) and
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
kaolinite and the results are plotted in Figure 9. It can be seen that when quartz was used instead
of chalcopyrite, the turbidity of the suspensions of kaolinite with and without quartz was the
us
same which indicates that no heterocoagulation took place. These results indicate that only fine
clay particles can attach to larger particles of chalcopyrite which reveals the distinctive
an
characteristics of these anisotropic minerals.
M
Conclusions
ed
Induction time and settling-turbidity measurements were used to assess the depressing effect of
clay minerals on the floatability of chalcopyrite. The analysis of the experimental results
pt
obtained using these techniques, and the observed relationships with the micro-flotation data
ce
indicate that both methods can be confidently used to study the interactions of clay minerals and
chalcopyrite and the possible consequences on the process of flotation. In particular the use of
Ac
could be tested to study heterocoagulation in other mineral systems. The analysis of the results
obtained in this work confirms that slime coating is an important mechanism of depression of
chalcopyrite. The experimental data show that the depressing effect of clay minerals increases as
16
the pH changes from 9 to 10. It is proposed that Ca2+ (lime) is responsible for heterocoagulation,
and as a result the hydrophobicity of the chalcopyrite particles drops which results in lower
recoveries. This effect suggests that the presence of ions in solution is a variable that has to be
taken into account to explain the interactions between clay minerals and chalcopyrite. The
t
ip
phenomenon of coating of bubbles with clays was confirmed in this work by image analysis and
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
it is proposed as a mechanism that might explain the depressing effect of clays on the floatability
cr
of chalcopyrite.
us
Acknowledgements
an
Support from the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development
(FONDECYT) of Chile under the project initiation into research no. 11140184, Centro CRHIAM
M
Proyecto Conicyt Fondap no.15130015, and Universidad de Concepcion under Project VRID no.
214.095.089-1.0 is gratefully acknowledged. Lina Uribe wants to acknowledge the support from
ed
Conicyt Scholarship for Doctoral Studies in Chile 2015 (Folio postulación 21150151). We want
to thank Dr. Janusz Laskowski for his valuable comments that allowed us to improve this
pt
manuscript. We also want to thank Mr. Cristian Melipichun and Mr. Roberto Vazquez for their
ce
17
References
Angove, M.J., Johnson, B.B., and Wells, J.D., 1997, “Adsorption of cadmium (II) on kaolinite”,
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Vol. 126, 1997, 137-147.
t
Ansari, A., and Pawlik M., 2007, “Floatability of chalcopyrite and molybdenite in the presence
ip
of lignosulfonates. Part I. Adsorption studies”, Minerals Engineering, 20, 600-608.
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Brady, P.V., Cygan, R.T., and Nagy, K.L., 1992, “Molecular Controls on Kaolinite Surface
us
Charge”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 183, 356-364.
an
Bickmore, B.R., Nagy, K.L., Sandlin, P.E., and Crater, T.S., 2002, “Quantifying Surface Areas
100, 1-13.
pt
Castro, S., Uribe, L., and Laskowski, J.S., 2014, “Depression of inherently hydrophobic minerals
Chipera, S.J., and Bish, D.L., 2001, "Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays:
powder X-Ray diffraction analyses", Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 49 (5), 398-409.
18
Ekmekci, Z., and Demirel, H., 1997, “Effects of galvanic interaction on collectorless flotation
behaviour of chalcopyrite and pyrite”, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 52, 31-48.
Elmahdy, A.M., Mirnezami, M., and Finch, J.A., 2008, “Zeta potential of air bubbles in presence
t
ip
Forbes, E., Davey, K.J., and Smith, L., 2014, “Decoupling rheology and slime coatings effect on
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
the natural flotability of chalcopyrite in a clay-rich flotation pulp”, Minerals Engineering, 56,
us
136-144.
Fornasiero, D., and Ralston, J., 2005, “Cu(II) and Ni(II) activation in the flotation of quartz,
an
lizardite and chlorite”, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 76, 75–81.
M
Gungor, N., 2000, “Effect of the adsorption of surfactants on the rheology of Nabentonite
Healy, T.W., and Moignard, M.S., 1976, “A review of electrokinetic studies of metal sulfides”,
in Flotation, A.M. Gaudin Memorial Volume, Vol. I, M.C. Fuerstenau, ed., AIME, New York,
pt
275-297.
ce
Heyes, G.W., Trahar, W.J., 1979, “Oxidation–reduction effects in the flotation of chalcocite and
Ac
Holuszko, M.E., Franzidis, J.P., Manlapig, E.V., Hampton, M.A., Donose, B.C., and Nguyen,
A.V., 2008, “The effect of surface treatment and slime coating on ZnS hydrophobicity”,
19
Hu, Y., Wei, S., Hao, J., Miller, J.D., and Fa, K., 2005, “The Anomalous Behavior of Kaolinite
Johnson, S.B., Russell, A.S., and Scales, P.J., 1998, “Volume Fraction Effects in Shear Rheology
t
ip
and Electroacoustic Studies of Concentrated Alumina and Kaolin Suspensions”, Colloids and
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, Vol. 141, 119-130.
us
Jowett, A., El-Sinbawy, H., and Smith, H.G., 1956, “Slime coating of coal in flotation pulps”,
an
Kelm, U., and Helle, S., 2005, “Acid leaching of malachite in synthetic mixtures of clay and
Kelm, U., Helle, S., Jerez, O., and Pincheira, M., 2013, “What are copper
Lagaly, G., and Ziesmer, S., 2003, “Colloid chemistry of clay minerals: the coagulation of
Laskowski, J.S., Yordan, J.L., and Yoon, R.H., 1989, “Electrokinetic potential of microbubbles
Leja, J., 1982, Surface chemistry of froth flotation, New York and London: Plenum Press.
20
Liu, J., Zhou, Z., Xu, Z., and Masliyah, J., 2002, “Bitumen–Clay Interactions in Aqueous Media
Studied by Zeta Potential Distribution Measurement”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,
252, 409-418.
Liu, J., Xu, Z., and Masliyah, J., 2003, “Studies on bitumen-silica interactions in aqueous
t
ip
solutions by atomic force microscopy”, Langmuir, 19, 3911-3920.
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Liu, J., Xu, Z., and Masliyah, J., 2004, “Interaction between Bitumen and Fines in Oil Sands
us
Extraction System: Implication to Bitumen Recovery”, The Canadian Journal of Chemical
an
McFarlane, A., Bremmell, K., and Addai-Mensah, J., 2005, “Microstructure, rheology and
Mitchell, J.K., 1993, Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Nelson, J.D., and Miller, D.J. 1992, Expansive Soils, Problems and Practice in Foundation and
pt
O´Gorman, and Kitchener, J.A., 1974, “The flocculation and de-watering of kimberlite clay
Ac
Owusu, C., Brito-Abreu, S., Skinner, W., Addai-Mensah, J., Zanin, M., 2014, “The influence of
pyrite content on the flotation of chalcopyrite/pyrite mixtures”, Minerals Engineering, 55, 87-95.
21
Peng, Y., and Zhao, S., 2011, “The effect of surface oxidation of copper sulfide minerals on clay
Raghavan, S., and Hsu, L.L., 1984, “Factors affecting the flotation recovery of molybdenite”,
t
ip
Ran, B., and Melton, I.E., 1977, “Particle Interactions in Aqueous Kaolinite Suspensions: I.
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Effect of pH and Electrolyte upon the Mode of Particle Interaction in Homoionic Sodium
us
Kaolinite Suspensions”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 60(2), 308-320.
Saada, A., Siffert, B., and Papier, E., 1995, “Comparison of the Hydrophilicity/Hydrophobicity
an
of Illites and Kaolinites”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 174, 185-190.
M
Skinner, M.F., Zabowski, D., Harrison, R., Lowe, A., Xue, D., 2001, “Measuring the cation
exchange capacity of forest soils”, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32:11-
ed
12, 1751-1764
Sworska, A., Laskowski, J.S. and Cymerman, G., 2000, “Flocculation of the Syncrude fine
pt
tailings: Part I. Effect of pH, polymer dosage and Mg2+ and Ca2+ cations”, International Journal
ce
Tabares, J., Madrid, I., Reyes, J., Sánchez, A., Valdez, D., and López, A., 2006, “Surface
22
Todd, E.C., Sherman, D.M., Purton, J.A., 2003, “Surface oxidation of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2)
under ambient atmospheric and aqueous (pH 2-10) conditions: Cu, Fe L- and O K-edge X-ray
spectroscopy”, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 67, No. 12, pp. 2137–2146.
Vanerek, A., Alince, B., and van de Ven, T.G.M., 2006, “Delamination and flocculation
t
ip
efficiency of sodium activated kaolin and montmorillonite”, Colloids and Surfaces A:
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
Physicochem Engineering Aspects 273, 193–201.
us
Wark, I.W., 1938, “Principles of flotation”, Melborune: Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy.
an
Williams, D.J.A., and Williams, K.P., 1978, “Electrophoresis and zeta potential of kaolinite”,
Zhang, Q., Xu, Z., Bozkurt, V., and Finch, J.A., 1997, “Pyrite flotation in the presence of metal
pt
Zhao, S., and Peng, Y., 2012, “The oxidation of copper sulfide minerals during grinding and
Ac
23
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
Ac
ce
pt
ed
24
M
an
us
Figure 1. XRD diffractograms for samples of kaolinite (A) and smectite (B).
cr
ip
t
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
(B).
Ac
ce
pt
ed
25
M
an
us
cr
ip
Figure 2. SEM pictures of the clay samples used in the study, kaolinite (A), and smectite
t
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
Ac
ce
pt
ed
26
M
an
us
cr
Figure 3. Particle size distributions of samples of kaolinite, smectite, and chalcopyrite.
ip
t
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
Ac
ce
pt
ed
27
M
Figure 4. Schematic of method to determine induction time.
an
us
cr
ip
t
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
Ac
ce
pt
ed
28
M
Figure 5. Schematic of the method to assess slime coating.
an
us
cr
ip
t
Figure 6. Results of micro-flotation of chalcopyrite under the presence of different
additions of kaolinite and smectite. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the
measurements.
t
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
29
Figure 7. Effect of pH on induction time in the absence of clay minerals (A). Effect of clay
smectite at different pH values (B). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the
measurements.
t
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
30
Figure 8. Images of the air bubbles that were captured after the process of contact between
bubbles and chalcopyrite particles, and in the presence of clay minerals in suspension. (A)
t c = 500 ms, PAX 40 ppm, pH=10.0. (B) t c = 1000 ms, PAX 40 ppm, pH=10.0.
t
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
31
Figure 9. Turbidity measurements of clay minerals in the absence and presence of
t
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
32
Table 1. Mineralogical composition of clay samples.
t
ip
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
us
Smectite 75% montmorillonite, 16% feldspar, 8% quartz, 1% other traces 100 117
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
33
Table 2. Chemical and XRD mineralogical composition of chalcopyrite sample used in the
study.
Chalcopyrite sample
t
ip
XRD mineralogical composition
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
cr
CuFeS 2 % 97.1
us
FeS 2
an % 1.8
M
MoS 2 % 0.00
Quartz % 1.1
ed
Chemical analysis
pt
ce
Cu % 34.2
Ac
Fe % 30.2
S % 35.5
34
Downloaded by [Library Services City University London] at 16:58 23 March 2016
Ac
ce
Mo
pt
ed
%
35
M
an
0.0
us
cr
ip
t