Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effect of Indoor Plants On Human Comfort: Indoor and Built Environment September 2013
The Effect of Indoor Plants On Human Comfort: Indoor and Built Environment September 2013
net/publication/274476416
CITATIONS READS
24 5,488
5 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Chanjuan Sun on 21 September 2015.
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Indoor and Built Environment can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://ibe.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
What is This?
Abstract
There is growing evidence to support the notion that plants can play an important role in providing a
higher quality living environment. This study conducted a series of experiments to investigate the
effects of characteristics, such as colour, odour and size of plants on human comfort, which was
evaluated by a satisfaction survey and physiological measurements. Different kinds of plants with
different levels of colour (green, tint and multicolour), odour (no odour, slight scent and strong
scent) and size (small, medium and large) were chosen for the experiment design. A survey of partici-
pants’ satisfaction degree as well as measurements from electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardio-
gram (ECG), oxyhaemoglobin saturation, fingertip blood flow, skin resistance and respiration rate were
utilized to illustrate the response of participants to the environments either with different plants or
without plants. The results demonstrated that an interior office with plants was preferred over an office
without plants. The environments with green, slightly scented and small plants were reported as the
most favourite conditions. The EEG and oxyhaemoglobin saturation showed significant changes when
plant conditions varied. These outcomes provided design strategies for incorporating the plants into
the interior office spaces and also provided the physiological variables to evaluate human comfort in
the outside environment.
Keywords
Plants, Comfort, Survey, Physiology measurement, EEG
Accepted: 12 February 2013
Table 1. Thermal condition in experimental office. significance level were determined. The statistical power
of 80% was maintained. As to the significance level,
Temperature Humidity Velocity
0.05 was used. Fourth, based on the previous experi-
Offices ( C) (%) (m s–1)
ence with research of physiological parameters, the
Comparison office 22.1 0.2 43.3 2.3 0.2 effect size was 0.4 referring to large effect. All of the
Testing office 22.4 0.3 40 1.1 0.2 specifications needed for using the priori power analysis
were obtained, then with G*Power, the minimum
sample size was calculated to be 12. In this experiment,
0.2 m s–1. The relative humidity was controlled to be 16 college-age students (8 males and 8 females) were
around 40%. selected with the age of 23.5 0.3, the height of
165.5 1.5 cm and the weight of 56.7 2.5 kg; all par-
ticipants were healthy non-smokers who were not
The experimental plants
taking prescription medication and had no history of
According to the previous research, there are some cardiovascular disease; they dressed in light sweaters
characteristics of plants, such as colour, scent (flower and trousers (0.79 clo)21 and remained sedentary
fragrance) and size, which have effect on human com- during exposure to the experimental conditions.
fort, task performance and mood.13–16 Therefore, these
three basic factors of plants were chosen in current
research. The three features of plants (colour, odour
Design of experiments
and size), which formed the independent variables in The within-subject design, i.e. each participant partici-
the present research, were inspected. When we come pated in all experimental conditions, was adopted in
to the plant selection, the three features with significant order to reduce the error variation. Responding to the
difference in levels should be taken into consideration, purpose of this research, the three factors were respect-
as well as the growth season of different plants. ively inspected on three different levels; there were
Moreover, the interaction between any two factors green, tint and multicolour for colour investigation,
should be avoided to investigate the variables separ- non-odour, slight scent and strong scent for odour
ately. We took into consideration three different levels investigation and small, medium and large for size
for each feature. The effort to provide three different research. The objective of the design was to maintain
levels of one factor while keeping the other two factors two of these factors at a certain level, while manipulat-
at the same level has been taken to eliminate the inter- ing the remaining one, varying through it at three
relations among these three factors. The amount of levels.
design experimental conditions was more than that Table 2 demonstrates the conditions of experimental
requested by orthogonal test method. In other words, design in which 1,2,3 represent the levels value of each
the inter-relations among different factors were con- influential factor. The experimental conditions were
sidered by the design combinations of plants that classified as three groups consistent with three factors.
have mathematically the same efficacy as with orthog- For colour group, 1–3 represents green, tint and multi-
onal test. colour; for odour group, 1–3 stands for non-odour,
In this way, the plants growing in cold weather and slight scent and strong scent; for size, 1–3 refers to
providing the properties mentioned above were selected small, medium and large. Moreover, the tests under
(see Figure 1). The detailed features of each plant are different conditions were conducted separately. Some
discussed in the following section. of the conditions with odorous plants were arranged
at the end of the day to avoid the odour effect. For
others, there was long enough interval, 2–3 h, to elim-
Participants
inate the effect of odour with the door and window
Referring to the existing studies on physiology param- opening.
eters,17 the number of participants ranged from 4 to 8. Due to the limiting condition of the season and
A priori power analysis18 was made to determine the inherent characteristics of plants, several plants, such
required number of participants. The parameters, just as the Lavender and the Sansevieriatrifasciata, were
like the statistical power, the significance level and the included in two or more groups, to reduce the limita-
effect size, were specified on the basis of the empirical tions. We also kept the fixed factor balance by adjusting
value and calculated by the software G*Power.12,19,20 the quantity of plants. Take the lavender for example,
First, the physiological parameter of human was speci- when it was contained in the colour group, we removed
fied to be considered. Second, the within-subjects its flower so there would be no scent, the same as
design was used and the ANOVA for repeated meas- Sansevieriatrifasciata and poinsettia. At the same time,
ures was applied. Third, the statistical power level and we arranged enough plants in the office to make them
Condition
number Classification Colour Odour Size Plants
1 Comparison — — — None
3 Odour group 1 1 1 Lavender
2 Odour group 1 2 1 Menthahaplocalyx
8 Odour group 1 3 1 Pelargonium odouratissimum
3 Colour group 1 1 2 Lavender
5 Colour group 2 1 2 Sansevieriatrifasciata
6 Colour group 3 1 2 Poinsettia
3 Size group 1 1 1 Lavender
7 Size group 1 1 2 Sansevieriatrifasciata
4 Size group 1 1 3 Alocasia Rhizome
the same size as the other two kinds of plants. In this evaluate the occupants’ sensation on the environment
way, the factors except colour were maintained at the with plants, and the latter measured the variation in
same level (odour was 1 and size was 2). The same participants’ physical parameters to illustrate the
situation happened with the Sansevieriatrifasciata. effect of indoor plants on human comfort.
(see Figure 2). This voting scale was adopted from ther- respiration rate were recorded with the biological
mal comfort evaluation research which was proposed signal measurement device, called PowerLab
by Zhang.22 It has been validated in other research that (see Figure 3).
it was convenient and accurate to reflect the human The negative lead (red) and the positive lead
sensation on the environment.23 The evaluation of (brown) were attached to the right and left wrist,
each environment and how it contrasted with the com- respectively.25 And the ground lead (green) was
parison condition was also included in this part. The attached to the right ankle. The EEG measurements
choices given in the questionnaire for the occupants were conducted on two positions of the forehead with
were unpleasant, no difference or pleasant, which electrical potential (voltage) difference. The EEG and
were represented respectively by 1, 0 and 1. ECG waves were first filtered within the Powerlab
Moreover, the basic thermal comfort survey was program to remove the noises. The low-pass filtering
conducted by researchers to regulate the thermal envir- was used for ECG wave for which the upper limit was
onment in a timely manner. Thermal sensation and ther- 35 Hz. For the EEG wave, four frequency waves
mal comfort were included based on previous were separately filtered. They were d-band (0.5–
studies.23,24 Within this method, 80% was taken as 2 Hz), y-band (3–7 Hz), a-band (8–13 Hz) and b-band
the satisfaction ratio. (14–35 Hz). The right thumb was sandwiched by oxy-
haemoglobin saturation sensor for readings. Two
fingertip blood flow sensors were attached to the
Physiological testing. The parameters, such as middle and ring finger of right hand. The skin resist-
EEG, electrocardiogram (ECG), oxyhaemoglobin sat- ance sensor was clamped on the left ring finger and
uration, fingertip blood flow, skin resistance and the respiration rate band was wound on the
Figure 4. Measurements.
participants’ waist. Figure 4 depicts the physiological The change of subjective evaluation appeared when the
measurements under different conditions. environment changed, so it did not take much time to
adapt the new condition. For the physiological meas-
urements, the EEG waves were sensitive to any change
Procedures
of the environment, so it should balance the adaptation
Each experimental condition lasted for 30 min, during time and the transit time. Based on the previous
which except the researchers and participants, no other research,23 it took 20 min for adaptation in the thermal
persons were allowed to enter into or exit the experi- environment. In this research, in order to consider the
mental office space. The detailed experimental proced- sensitivity of the parameters, the adaptation time was
ure was as follows. As mentioned before, the conditions set as 15–20 min.
could be considered as two different kinds, in which one
was the comparison condition without plants and the
Data processing method
other was the condition with plants. For the compari-
son condition, upon the participants’ arrival to the Outlier analysis was made first to remove exceptional
office without plants, they sat on the chair in front of values from the obtained results. The range between
the table and began to adapt themselves to the envir- 25th-1.5IQR and 75th + 1.5IQR (IQR–inter quartile
onment which took about 15 min, then answered the range) was used as non-outlier range.26 Data collected
thermal comfort and satisfaction questionnaires for in the tables (with removed outliers) were then summar-
1–2 min. Subsequently, the researcher placed the ized with descriptive statistics.
physiological detectors at relevant sites on the subjects’ A one-way analysis of variance tested whether the
body. Meanwhile, the data acquisition program col- sensation scores varied significantly between all the
lected readings from the 6 detectors. After 5 min of rec- plants conditions.
ording, the measurement was finished. Furthermore
for the condition with plants, participants first spent
15–20 min in the office without plants and answered Results
the thermal comfort questionnaires. When they fin-
ished, they were led to the office with plants next
Questionnaires
door. After 5–10 min, they were requested to report The degree of overall satisfaction and pleasant
their sensation of and satisfaction with the environ- sensation.
ment. Subsequently, the physiological measurement was The participants’ self-evaluated responses of
conducted in the same way as in the comparison room. satisfaction degree and pleasant sensation in the
experimental office were statistically analyzed. The sat- This illustrates that the green plants obviously pro-
isfaction degree of participants was high in the envir- vided the highest degree of satisfaction, the average
onment with plants (see Figure 5). value of which was up to 2.1. Almost 70% of the par-
The survey showed that most of the participants ticipants were ‘‘satisfied’’ with the green plants, and
kept slightly satisfied or satisfied (scoring more than 20% of them ‘‘very satisfied’’ (score equal to 3) with
1.4) with the environment; even an evaluation of very this condition. However, no one voted for dissatisfac-
satisfied emerged. Compared with the condition with- tion. The results also demonstrated that the condition
out plants, participants in the environment with plants with multicolour plants was controversial. Although
reported a higher happiness/pleasant sensation with a the average degree of satisfaction for multicolour
score that was almost equal to 1. plants (0.6875) was higher than that for tint plants
Figure 6 presents the voting percentage of satisfac- (0.375), the distribution of voting percentage represents
tion degree and the pleasant sensation under all the that the ratio of ‘‘slightly dissatisfied’’ (–1) with multi-
conditions with plants. The majority of participants, colour plants took a larger proportion of 30% than
up to 60% or more under every condition, reported that with tint plants. Therefore, it was reasonable to
that they were satisfied (value of 2) with the environ- evaluate the condition based on the average satisfaction
ment. There were a certain number of participants degree combined with questionnaire percentage.
selecting ‘‘slightly dissatisfied’’ with the environment,
although the ratio was small. As can be seen from the
results of pleasant sensation evaluation, the partici-
Evaluation on odour
pants who considered the condition with plants to The results of satisfaction evaluation on the plants’
be more pleasant than that with no plants accounted odour, classified as non-odour, slight scent and strong
for 80%. scent, were statistically analyzed on the basis of experi-
mental design, as well as the voting ratio (see Figure 8).
As can be seen from the results, the satisfaction
Evaluation on colour degree of participants under the condition with slight
The results of satisfaction evaluation on the plants’ scent plants was the highest one among all the three
colour, classified as green, tint and multicolour, were conditions, with the average value up to 1.44. Almost
statistically analyzed on basis of experimental design. 60% of them felt satisfaction (score 2) and more than
Moreover, the percentage of every evaluation level was 15% were very satisfied with this condition (score 3).
calculated as the supplemental explanation for degree The condition with strong scent plants was subse-
of satisfaction, as shown in Figure 7. quently a favourite one, with the average value of 1.3.
Figure 6. Percentage of satisfaction and pleasant under all conditions with plants.
The satisfaction degree of participants under the None of the participants felt dissatisfaction. The second
condition with small size plants was the highest one pleasant condition was created by medium-size plants
among all three conditions, with the average value with the average satisfaction value of 1.8. In this envir-
of 2. Over 60% felt satisfaction (score 2) and almost onment, 80% participants felt ‘‘satisfaction’’ and none
20% of them very satisfied with this condition (score 3). of them dissatisfied. The large-size plants brought the
Figure 10. Variation on ratio of electroencephalography (EEG) bands between conditions with and without plants.
lowest satisfaction degree with the average of 1.4 and a-band and b-band. Corresponding to this, the
20% of the participants dissatisfied with the current least a-band and b-band accompanied by the most d-
condition. band, y-band occurred under the multicolour condi-
tion. Second, in the odour group, the plants with
slight scent led to the highest ratio of a-band and b-
Physiological measurements band and the plants with strong scent provided the
All the physiological readings were exported from the lowest. Thirdly, in the size group, the small size
program and analyzed using the method mentioned evoked the most a-band and b-band and the medium
above. size plants evoked the most d-band and y-band.
Table 3 represents the p value of EEG bands under
different conditions calculated with paired t-test. The
Electroencephalography significant difference of the effect on d-band, a-band
The variation of EEG band could sensitively reflect the and b-band (p < 0.05) was discovered between tint
situation of human neural activity, from which we can plants and multicolour plants. Simultaneously, the
indirectly acquire the information on human comfort effect on b-band was also different between plants
through the data transformation. The EEG could be with small size and medium size. Overall, the ratio of
separated into four categories in the form of frequency: EEG bands had a strong sensitive variation in relation
d-band, y-band, a-band and b-band.27 It was influenced to the change in plants.
by multiple exterior factors. The slight change of the
external environment or the variation of participants’
psychological situation could result in a huge disturb-
ance on the EEG. The spectrum analysis method was
Electrocardiogram
adopted for calculating the ratio of four EEG bands. The heart rate (HR) and HRV were calculated and
Figure 10 shows the EEG variation between the con- exported from the ECG recorded by the physiological
dition with plants and condition without plants. It indi- program. The participants’ HR (beats per min – b/min)
cates that d-band, a-band and b-band had a significant under experimental conditions is shown in Figure 12 in
difference under the two conditions, with paired t-test P which the column represents the average value of HR.
equal to 0. In other words, the EEG band was the most It varied slightly from 75 b/min to 80 b/min.
sensitive parameter based on the fact that the three Figure 13 shows the participants’ HR and HRV
band parameters had significantly changed due to the when they were in the office with plants and without
environmental variation. plants. Neither showed significant difference (with
Figure 11 illustrates the ratio of EEG bands under p ¼ 0.91 and 0.775 > 0.05) between those two condi-
different experimental groups. First, in the colour tions. In order to investigate the HRV difference
group, the office with green plants evoked the most within each parametric group, Table 4 illustrates the
Figure 11. Relative electroencephalography (EEG) power of different bands under experimental conditions.
Figure 13. Heart rate and heart rate variability under the conditions with and without plants.
Table 6. p Value of fingertip blood flow, skin resistance, and respiration rate under different conditions.
Green–tint 0.59 0.39 0.60 Noodour–slightscent 0.42 0.90 0.14 Small–medium 0.04* 0.16 0.67
Tint–multicolour 0.81 0.91 0.65 Slightscent–strong scent 0.50 0.20 0.99 Medium–large 0.06 0.57 0.96
Green–multicolour 0.73 0.21 0.72 Noodour–strong scent 0.11 0.09 0.56 Small–large 0.49 0.38 0.60
pF, pS, pR respectively denote the p values of paired t-test for fingertip blood flow, skin resistance, and respiration rate measurement.
*Represents significant difference between two conditions.
demonstrated that the participants were happier in any bands was linked to the influence of positive and nega-
environment with plants than in the environments with- tive effects on human comfort situation. Take the
out plants. It confirmed the standpoint presented in change between the condition with plant and that with-
former research3–6 that plants planted and optimized out plants for example; the participants in the environ-
in the office conditions could affect the occupants’ ment with plants reported a higher pleasant sensation
mood, as well as would improve the occupants’ with a score that was almost equal to 1. Corresponding
productivity.13 to the change of evaluation, there was also a significant
Accompanied with the overall evaluation on the difference in the ratio with the EEG bands. With the
environment, the preference and satisfaction on the increasing of satisfaction degree, the ratio of a band
colour, odour and size of plants were reported. For and b band increased significantly. It provides the evi-
the colour group, the green plants brought the highest dence that the consistence existed in the subjective sen-
degree of participants’ satisfaction compared with tint sation and physiological reaction. Furthermore, the
and multicolour plants. The high ratio of ‘‘slightly dis- similar situation also happened when recording the oxy-
satisfied’’ for multicolour plants implied some negative haemoglobin saturation. When the odour or the size of
effects caused by this condition. The comments and the plants changed, the difference of oxyhaemoglobin
suggestions from participants on the colour were inves- saturation was shown to be significant, which can be
tigated, suggesting two reasons for this dissatisfaction; bigger or smaller than before. Based on the collection
some did not prefer multicolour, while the others just data in this research, there was significant difference
did not enjoy the colour itself, because the red colour of between some selected conditions, yet there was no par-
the poinsettia may cause visual fatigue when partici- ticular pattern reflecting the change trend. The oxy-
pants concentrate on it for a long time.28 For the haemoglobin saturation is an important physiological
odour group, the plants with slight scent provided parameter of respiration cycle. It could be easy to
more satisfaction and higher ‘‘satisfied’’ percentage understand the difference among odour conditions.
than the plant with no odour and strong odour. For However, there would be complexity in the factors to
the size group, the participants reported the most sat- identify the reasons for causing the differences among
isfaction for the small-size plants. other groups.
Consistent with the evaluation on comfort and sat- Usually, when the d band dominates, people are in a
isfaction level of the environment, the physiological deep sleep or unconscious. The quality of sleeping has a
parameters, such as EEG and oxyhaemoglobin satur- direct and inseparable relationship with the d band.
ation, displayed the significant variation responding to Research has indicated that people could relax them-
the environment change. Especially, the ratio of EEG selves from insomnia to deep sleep.9,17 When the y band
dominates, the consciousness of people is interrupted and respiration rate) illustrated significant difference
and the body is deeply relaxed in the way when they are when the environment changed and these are pro-
under hypnotic condition.9 In this case, the y band is posed as indicators of human comfort.
very helpful for triggering deep memories and 4. The relative EEG power of a- + b-bands would
strengthening long-term memory. When the a-band increase when accompanied by that of d-band
dominates, people are in a state of awareness and the decrease when participants were under the comfort-
body is relaxed. This state of awareness could play the able condition, which illustrated that it may become
role of a bridge between consciousness and sub-con- an important variable to estimate the comfort
sciousness. In this state, the energy exhausted by the sensations.
physical body would be the least in comparison to the
energy supplied to the brain, which would be the most.
Therefore, the action could be more rapid, smooth and Acknowledgments
acute. Finally, b band just only appears at the frontal This work was supported by the major projects of National
area of the brain. When people’ eyes are open or when ‘‘Eleventh Five-Year plan’’ of China [NO. 2006BAJ02A00];
they are thinking, more b band would appear. and the Technology Innovation Action Plan sponsored by
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai, China
As seen in Figure 11 shown before, under the con-
[NO. 10dz1200403]. The authors thank the volunteers for
dition with green plants, the ratio of a + b band was
their cooperation in this study and Ms. Theresa Trohlck for
the highest and that of d band was the lowest. This her suggestions to improve the English of this paper.
illustrated that participants were active and the aware-
ness was clear, which provided the appropriate condi-
References
tion for office tasks. The same situation could be found
1. Larsen L, Adams J, Deal B, et al. Plants in the workplace—the
in the conditions with slight scent and small size plants. effects of plant density on productivity, attitudes, and percep-
However, when the participants were under the condi- tions. Environ Behav 1998; 30: 261–281.
tion with multicolour plants, the situation was opposite 2. Han KT. Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the
to the former. Instead of high ratio of a + b band, the psychology, behavior, and health of students at a junior high
ratio of d band which emerged in large numbers during school in Taiwan. Environ Behav 2009; 41: 658–692.
3. Roelofsen P. The impact of office environments on employee
sleeping was the highest. It indicated that the con-
performance: the design of the workplace as a strategy for prod-
sciousness was relatively static and the condition was uctivity enhancement. J Facil Manag 2002; 1: 18.
disadvantageous to improve the occupants’ productiv- 4. Wells M. Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: the role
ity and satisfaction due to the environment. The same of office personalization in employee and organizational well-
situation happened under the condition with no odour being. J Environ Psychol 2000; 20: 17.
5. Conklin E. Interior plantings bring nature indoors. Amer
and large-size plants.
Nurseryman 1974; 139: 10.
The significant difference of oxyhaemoglobin satur- 6. Conklin E. Interior landscaping. J Arboriculture 1978; 4: 7.
ation under different conditions demonstrates that it 7. Chang CY. Human response to window views and indoor plants
could be taken as a sensitive index to evaluate the com- in the workplace. HortScience 2005; 40: 1354–1359.
fort of participants. More studies should be conducted 8. Bringslimark T. Psychological benefits of indoor plants in work-
places: putting experimental results into context. HortScience
to ascertain how it is related to comfort sensations.
2007; 42: 581–587.
9. Yao Y, Lian Z, Liu W, et al. Heart rate variation and electro-
encephalograph—the potential physiological factors for thermal
Conclusions comfort study. Indoor Air 2009; 19: 93–101.
Subjective questionnaires on the comfort sensation and 10. Thakor NV and Tong S. Advances in quantitative electroenceph-
alogram analysis methods. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2004; 6:
satisfaction degree as well as objective physiological
453–495.
measurements were made in different conditions 11. Yao Y, Lian Z, Liu W, et al. Experimental study on physiological
(office with different plants or without any plants). responses and thermal comfort under various ambient tempera-
The following conclusions can be drawn. tures. Physiol Behav 2008; 93: 310–321.
12. Zhang H, Arens E, Kim D, et al. Comfort, perceived air quality,
and work performance in a low-power task–ambient condition-
1. The high satisfaction degree and comfort sensation
ing system. Build Environ 2010; 45: 29–39.
demonstrate that an environment with plants can 13. Shibata S and Suzuki N. Effects of the foliage plant
effectively improve human comfort. on task performance and mood. J Environ Psychol 2002; 22:
2. The environment assessed to be the most comfort- 265–272.
able condition was the one with green, slightly 14. Adachi M, Rohde CLE and Kendle AD. Effects of floral and
foliage displays on human emotions. HortTechnology 2000; 10:
scented and small-size plants.
59–63.
3. The EEG and oxyhaemoglobin saturation in selected 15. Lohr VI and Pearson-Mims CH. Physical discomfort may be
six physiological indexes (EEG, ECG, oxyhaemoglo- reduced in the presence of interior plants. HortTechnology
bin saturation, fingertip blood flow, skin resistance 2000; 10: 53–58.
16. Fjeld T. The effect of interior planting on health and discomfort 23. Zhang Y and Zhao R. Relationship between thermal sensation
among workers and school children. HortTechnology 2000; 10: and comfort in non-uniform and dynamic environments. Build
46–52. Environ 2009; 44: 1386–1391.
17. Lin Z and Deng S. A study on the thermal comfort in sleeping 24. Zhang H, Arens E, Huizenga C, et al. Thermal sensation and
environments in the subtropics—developing a thermal comfort comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments,
model for sleeping environments. Build Environ 2008; 43: 70–81. part III: whole-body sensation and comfort. Build Environ
18. Thom B. Understanding statistical power in the context of 2010; 45: 399–410.
applied research. Appl Ergon 2004; 35: 73–80. 25. Norman SE, Eager RA, Waran NK, et al. Recording of ECG
19. Lan L and Lian Z. Application of statistical power ana- signals on a portable MiniDisc recorder for time and frequency
lysis—how to determine the right sample size in human health, domain heart rate variability analysis. Physiol Behav 2005; 83:
comfort and productivity research. Build Environ 2010; 45: 729–738.
1202–1213. 26. Targowski A. Possibility of improving perceived air quality by an
20. Mayr S, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Short tutorial of GPower. air cleaner: Master thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2010.
Tutorials Quant Meth Psych 2007; 3: 51–59. 27. Jing H. Topographic analysis of dimension estimates of EEG and
21. Li L, Wang F, Shen J, et al. Analysis on results of thermal com- filtered rhythms in epileptic patients with complex partial seiz-
fort field study in microcomputer laboratory of colleges in ures. Biol Cybern 2000; 83: 391–397.
Harbin. Forest Eng 2009; 25: 4. 28. Stepanek M. Psychology of colours. Kunststoffe 2010; 100:
22. Zhang H. Thermal Sensation and Comfort in Transient and 152–153.
Non-uniform Thermal Environments. Berkeley, CA, University
of California at Berkeley, 2003.