Referenc e Calculation Remarks

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Referenc Calculation Remarks

e
5400

4800

Data
Steel Grade = S350
Concrete = C25/30
Reinforcement = T12
Mesh reinforcement = A252

Span, L = 5.4 m
hc = 105 mm
hp = 80 mm
Rib Spacing, bo= 300 mm
Deck Area, Ap = 1850 mm2
Steel Thickness, t = 1.2 mm
t, slab = 125 mm

E = 210000 N/mm2
fy = 350 N/mm2
fu = 30 N/mm2
d,bar = 12 mm
Bending resistance (+ve) = 12 kNm/m
Bending resistance (-ve) = 10.5 kNm/m
Mesh (S460) = 252 mm2/m
fy,mesh = 460 N/mm2

Referenc Calculation Remarks


e
Loading
S.W slab (dry) = 3 kN/m2
BS EN
4-1-6 S.W slab (wet) = 3.125 kN/m2
S.W decking = 0.15 kN/m2
Construction loading,qc = 1.5 kN/m2 and 0.75kN/m2
Imposed loading, qi = 2.5 kN/m2
MS EN
1-1-1 Partitions = 0.5 kN/m2
Table
Other DL = 0.5 kN/m2
NA3.

Partial Factors
𝛾i (imposed and construction) = 1.5
𝛾fd (s.w) = 1.25
𝜉 = 0.925

Concrete Properties = C25/30


fcd =14.2 N/mm2
ES EN 2- Ecm (short term) = 30.5 kN/mm2
1-1
Ec (long term) = 10 kN/mm2
Table 3.1
BS EN 4- ns (short term) = 7
1-1
nL (long term) = 21
Annex C
𝜀s = 0.000325
Design for construction stage
Factored construction loading
q c ( within L=3 m )=1.5×(1.5+0.15+ 3.125) kN /m2
¿ 7.1625 kN /m 2

q c (L> 3 m)=1.5 ×(0.75+0.15+3.125)kN/m2


¿ 6.0375 kN /m2
Referenc Calculation Remarks
e
Bending Moment on simply supported decking
2

2 2 ( 7.1625 kN /m2−6.0375 kN /m2 ) × 5.4 m−3 m


( )
7.1625 kN /m ×(5.4 m) 2
M ed= −
8 2
¿ 25.2973 kNm /m
Bending Resistance of deck profile in positive bending
M Rd =12 kNm/m< M ed=25.2973 kNm /m
⸫Not OK

For single line of props:


qc ×( 0.5 L)2
M ed =
8
¿ 7.1625 kN /m2 × ¿ ¿

Prop force:
L
Ned=γ fd ×q c ×
2
5.4 m
¿ 1.25 ×7.1625 kN /m 2 × =24.1734 kN /m
2

Bending Resistance of deck profile in negative bending


M Rd =10.5 kNm /m> M Ed =6.5268 kN m/m
⸫ OK

Web crushing resistance of internal support


𝛼 (for sheeting profile) = 0.15
𝜙 (angle of web to flange) = 70
la (bearing length) = 100 mm
t = 1.16 mm
Cl
6.1.7.3(2) r = 2.32 mm
EC 3-1-3

Rw , Rd =α ×t 2 × √ f y E ×(1−0.1 √ r /t)×(0.5+ √la /50 t)×(2.4 + √ ϕ/90)/γ M 1


2.32 mm 100 mm
Rw , Rd =0.15 ×(1.16 mm)2 × √ 350 N /mm2 × 210000 N /mm2 ×(1−0.1
√ 1.16 mm √
) ×( 0.5+
50 ×1.16 mm

Rw , Rd =8.0943 kN /web
¿ 2 ×8.0943/(0.3 mm spacing)=53.9621 kN /m

Combining bending moment and web crushing


6.0375 kNm /m 24.1734 kN /m
M Ed /M Rd + N ed /R w , Rd = +
12 kNm/m 53.9621kN /m
¿ 1.0696<1.25
⸫ OK
Cl 6.1.11
EC 3-1-3
Design of Composite Slab at Ultimate Limit State
q Ed =1.5 ×(2.5+ 0.5)kN /m2+(1.25 ×(3+ 0.15+0.5)kN /m 2)
¿ 9.0625 kN /m2
L 5.4 m
V ed =q Ed × =9.0625 kN /m2 ×
2 2
¿ 24.4688 kN /m
q Ed × L2 9.0625 kN /m2 ×5.4 m2
M Ed = =
8 8
¿ 33.0328 kNm /m

BS EN 4-
1-1
Cl
9.7.3(8)
Annex
B3.6

a) Use effective longitudinal shear resistance method


τ Rd=0.36 N /mm2
Lv =L /4=1350 mm
D p= ( hc +h p ) −(h ¿¿ p /2)¿
¿ ( 105 mm+80 mm ) −(80 mm /2)=145 mm

Tensile force in decking over shear span,


N=τ R d b Lv
¿ 0.36 N /mm2 ×1350 mm ×1000 mm=486000 N

Depth of concrete in compression,


N
yc=
f cd b
486000
¿ =34.2254 mm
14.2×1000

Bending resistance of composite slab,


M Rd =N × ( d p −0.5 y c )

¿ 486000 N (145 mm−0.5 ×34.2254 mm)/106


¿ 562.1532 kN /m> Med=33.0328125 kNm /m
⸫ OK

b) Use the m-k method


BS EN 4- m = 0.204 kN/mm2
1-1
k = 0.156 kN/mm2
Annex
B3.2
V Rd=(b d p /γ vs )((m A p / Lv )+ k )
¿((1000 mm ×145 mm/1.25)((0.204 kN /mm 2 ×1850 mm2 /1350 mm)+0.156 kN /mm2))/1000
¿ 50.5244 kN /m>Ved =24.46875 kN / m
⸫ OK
Serviceability Limit State
Uncracked inertia of composite slab
Ar =¿

¿(3.142 ×(12 mm)2 / 4)/(12 mm/1000)=377.1429 mm2 / m


I p=2370000 mm4 /m
Ar + A p=377.1429 mm2 /m+1850 mm2 /m=2227.1429 mm2 /m

For short term deflection (n=7)


y g=d p [n ×(A p + Ar )+0.5 b d p ]/[n( A p + A r)+b d p ]

145mm [7 × ( 1850 mm2 /m+ 377.14 mm2 /m ) + ( 0.5 ×1000 mm ×145 mm ) ]


¿
7 (1850 mm2 /m+ 377.14 mm2 /m)+(1000 mm× 145 mm)
¿ 79.5383 mm
b × d p3 2 2
I g= +n (A p + Ar )(d p − y g ) + b d p ( y g −0.5 d p) +n I p
12
1000mm × 145 mm3 2 2 2
¿ +7 (1850 mm /m+377.14 mm /m)(145 mm−79.5383mm) +1000 mm ×145 mm ×(7
12

¿ 344.63 ×106 mm4 /m

Ec I g=30.5 kN /mm2 × 344.63× 106 mm 4 /m=1.05 ×10 10 kN mm 2 /m

For long term deflection (n=21)


d p [ n ( A p + A r ) + 0.5 b d p ]
y g=
n( A p + A r )+ b d p

145mm [ 21 ( 1850 mm2 / m+377.14 mm2 /m ) +0.5 ×1000 mm ×145 mm ]


¿
21 ( 1850 mm2 /m+ 377.14 mm2 /m ) +1000 mm× 145 mm
¿ 90.1817 mm
I g=b ×d p3 /12+n ×( A p + Ar )(d p − y g )2+ b d p ×( y g−0.5 d p )2+ n × I p
1000mm ×(145 mm)3
¿ +21(1850 mm 2 /m+377.14 mm 2 /m)(145 mm−90.18 mm)2 +1000 mmm× 145 m×(
12

¿ 4.9 ×10 8 m m4 /m

Ec I g=10 kN /mm2 × 489701250.1 mm 4 /m=4.9 ×109 kN mm2 /m

Cracked inertia of composite slab


r =( A p + A r )/(b d p )
¿( 2227.1429m m2)/(1000 mm ×145 mm)
¿ 0.0154

For short term deflection (n=7)


y e =d p ×(−nr + √ 2 nr +(nr )2 )

¿ 145 mm × (−7× 0.0154+ √ 2 ×7 × 0.0154+(7 ×0.0154)2 )


¿ 53.4328 mm

I cr =b × y e 3 /3+n( A p+ A r )(d p− y e )2+ n I p


¿(1000 mm × (53.43 mm )3 /3)+( 7(2227.14 mm 2 /m) ( 145 mm−53.43 mm )2)+(7 ×2370000 mm4 /m)

¿ 1.98 ×108 mm4 /m

Ec I cr =30.5 kN /mm2 × 1.98 ×108 mm 4 /m=6.04 ×10 9 kN /mm2

For long term deflection (n=21)


y e =d p ×(−nr + √ 2 nr +(nr )2 )

¿ 145 mm × (−21× 0.0154+ √ 2× 21× 0.0154+(7 ×0.0154)2 )


¿ 78.7319 mm

I cr =b × y e 3 /12+ n ×( A p + A r )(d p− y e )2+ n × I p


1000mm ×(78.7319 mm)3 2
¿ +21 ( 2227.4 mm2 /m ) ( 145 mm−78.7319 mm ) +21 ×2370000 mm4 /m
12

¿ 4.18 × 108 m m 4 /m

Ec I cr =10 kN /mm2 × 4.18 ×10 8 m m4 /m=4.18× 109 kN mm2 /m

¿ force , P=1.25 × ( 3.125+0.15 ) kN m2 / ×5.4 m/2


¿ 11.0531 kN /m

Effective inertia of composite section (long term)


Consider an effective stiffness of the average of the cracked and uncracked long term
stiffness:
I g + I cr
I eff =
2
( 489.70 m m4 /m+ 417.84 m m4 /m ) × 106
¿
2
6 4
¿ 453.77 × 10 mm /m

δ de P L3
¿
48 Ec I eff
¿ 11.05 kN /m× ¿¿
¿ 7.9908 mm(L/675.78)

Check deflection under imposed load considered as a short term load:


For the deflection due to prop removal, consider and effective stiffness of the
average of the cracked and uncracked stiffness:

I eff I g+ I cr
¿
2
( 344.63 mm4 /m+198.16 mm4 /m) ×10 6
¿
2
6 4
¿ 271.39 ×10 mm /m
5W L4
δ de =
384 E c I eff
5 (2+0.5) kN /m 2 ×5.4 m 4 × 109
¿
384 ×30.5 kN /mm2 × 271.39× 106 mm4 /m
¿ 4.013 mm ( L/1345.73)
Check deflection under other dead loads considered as a long term load:
5W L4
δ de =
384 E c I eff
5(0.5)kN /m2 ×5.4 m 4 × 109
¿
384 ×10 kN /mm2 × 453.77 ×106 mm 4 /m
¿ 1.22 mm

Shrinkage-induced deflection (long term condition using the cracked slab


stiffness):
For shrinkage calculations, the long term cracked stiffness may be used
conservatively.
ε s b hc ( y e −0.5 h c )L2
δ de = ,h c =depth of concrete topping
8 I cr
( 325× 10−6 ) ×1000 mm ×105 mm × ( 78.7319 mm−( 0.5 ×105 mm )) ×(5400 mm)2
¿
8 × 417.84 ×106 mm4 / m
¿ 7.8090 mm

Total deflection=7.99 mm+ 4.013mm+ 1.22mm+7.89 mm


5400 mm
¿ 21.03 mm< =21.6 mm
250
⸫OK

Vibration sensitivity – simplified design


Check natural frequency of floor:
δd is the instantaneous deflection due to re-application of the self-weight of the slab,
permanent loads and 10% imposed load
0.15+0.5+0.1 ( 2.5+0.5 )
δ d =4.0127 ×( )
2.5
¿ 6.34 mm
18
f=
√ δd
18
¿
√6.34
¿ 7.1487 Hz>5 Hz
⸫ OK
This shows that the 185mm deep floor is not sensitive to vibrations for a 5.4 m span.

Design of Composite Slab at Fire Limit State


The composite slab is designed to BS EN 1994-1-2 at the fire limit state. Consider a
BS EN fire resistance of 90 minutes. The steel decking is assumed to be ineffective in fire
1994-1-2
Table D.6 and the reinforced slab resists the moment at the fire limit state.
Average slabthickness , heff =hc +0.5 h p
¿ 105 mm+ ( 0.5 ×80 )
¿ 145 mm>h min=100 mm
⸫OK

Load at fire limit state


Partial factor on variable loads in fire, ϕ=0.6
q fi =ϕ q i+ qd

¿ 0.6 ×(2.5+0.5) kN /m 2 +(3+ 0.5+0.15) kN /m2


¿ 5.45 kN /m 2

Moment at fire limit state


M fi =q fi × L2 /8=5.45 kN /m2 ×(5.4 m)2 /8
¿ 19.87 kNm /m

Use single T12 reinforcing bar per rib at 40mm bottom cover
BS EN
1994-1-2 From Table D5 of BS EN 1994-1-2,
Table D.5 Temperature after 90 mins = 428℃

For cold-worked reinforcing bar, strength reduction factor is obtained from table 3.4
BS EN
1994-1-2 of BS EN 1994-1-2, and is
Table 3.4 k y ,ϕ =0.86(by interpolation)
Tensile resistance of rebar
π × d2
N Rd =k y ,ϕ × ( 4 )×f y

π ×12 mm2
¿ 0.86 × ( 4 )
× 460 N /mm2 × 10−3

¿ 44.74 kN
Compression strength of concrete in fire
f cd ,fi =0.85 ×25 N /mm 2
¿ 21.25 N /mm2

Depth of concrete in compression


N Rd
yc=
f cd , fi × b0
44.74 × 103 N
¿
21.25 N /mm 2 ×300 mm
¿ 7.0211 mm

Reduced bending resistance in fire


(heff −0.5 y c )×10−3
M Rd ,fi =N Rd ×
b0
(145 mm−0.5 ×7.02 mm)×10−3
¿ 44.74 kN ×
0.3 mm
¿ 21.11 kNm /m> M fi=q fi L2 /8=19.86525 kNm /m
⸫OK
This exceeds the applied moment of 19.87 kNm/m and shows that a single T12 bad
per rib is able to provide 90 minutes fire resistance for a 180mm deep slab.

Mesh Reinforcement
The mesh reinforcement is taken as A252 generally, which corresponds to 0.25%
reinforcement. Because the composite slab is designed as simply supported, it is not
necessary to provide reinforcement for crack control. However, if the slab had been
continuous over a beam, it would have been necessary to use 2 layers of A252 mesh
to satisfy the 0.4% reinforcement requirement.

You might also like