Overview On Huawei RAN Feature and Counters For Telkomsel: January 28, 2010

Security Level:
47pt Overview on Huawei RAN

Feature and Counters for
Telkomsel
January 28, 2010
www.huawei.com
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential

Contents
Telkomsel UMTS Double-Carrier Network Overview

Huawei KPI Architecture Overview
Structure of Measurement Groups
Event and Counter in Signalling Procedure
Trouble Shooting
Huawei RAN Parameter Optimization Overview
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 2

About Double-Carrier Network Strategy
• Overview of Double-Carrier Network
DRD: Direct Retry

Decision; UE is
asked to set up
HSPA channel in F2
cell directly without
any measurement
on the F2 cell’s
DRD for HSPA

quality.
Pros: The service

setup time can be
minimized which will
improve user
experience;
Cons: HSPA RAB

R99 setup failure may
happen in some
occasions
Requesting for Dialing Up to
a voice call connect with
internet

• Overview of Double-Carrier Network
F1 has continuous coverage
F1 is for R99 service only
All idle UEs will camp only on F1
F2 has coverage in hot-spot area only
F2 cell has almost the same RF coverage area with F1 cell in average and light-
loaded situation
F2 support HSPA + R99, with HSPA preferred
HSDPA service requests are DRD-ed from F1 cell to co-coverage F2 cell

• Pros and Cons with double-layer network strategy:
Pros:
Radio resources on Uu interface can be doubled (CE, Power, Code etc.) which may be
helpful in improving network access performance.
– Note: network access performance is related with some factors other than radio resource
R99 service, especially real-time R99 service, is time-delay sensitive, and requires a
higher QoS compared with PS BE service. By separating R99 from HSPA, the QoS of
R99 can be further secured and guaranteed.
Cons:
By using DRD to separate R99 from HSDPA, HSDPA UE is doing blind handover to F2
which will increase the possibility of HSDPA RAB setup failure.
PS CSSR, HSDPA Accessibility, PS CCSR, HSDPA Retainability may be affected by
using double carrier network strategy.
By admitting more users, especially HSPA user on Uu, the Iub bandwidth will become
more important in improving the whole network performance and user experience.

• Pros and Cons with double-layer network strategy:
Case study of HSDPA RAB setup failure with double-network strategy
DRD
When F2 cell is
heavily loaded
with quite a few
HSDPA users,
there will be gap in
coverage between
F1 and F2 cells,
and as a result,
some HSPA RAB
setup by DRD will
probably fail in this
area.

• Strategy for UE in IDLE Mode
F2 cell is BARRED to force UE camps on F1

• Strategy for UE in CONN Mode
Intra-frequency Neighbor Relationship:
Bi-directional:
– R99 (F1) ↔ R99 (F1) [for R99 mobility]
– HSDPA (F2) ↔ HSDPA (F2) [for HSDPA mobility]
Inter-freq Neighbor Relationship:
Bi-directional:
– R99 (F1) HSDPA (F2, F1 and F2 co-coverage cells) [for DRD blind HO from F1 to F2]
– HSDPA (F2) R99 (F1) [for user experience improvement by not handing over to GSM]
Inter-RAT Neighbor Relationship:
Bi-directional for F1 cells:
– R99 (F1) ↔ GSM [for cell-reselection, mobility]
Uni-directional for F2 cells:
– HSDPA (F2) GSM [for mobility]

• Overview of Neighbor Configuration
Pros:
In case of weak coverage in F2, UE can handover from F2 directly to F1 rather than in GSM, which may help improve user
experience in some way.
Cons:
The neighbor relationships for intra/inter-frequency and inter-RAT are complicated as well as algorithm related parameters.
UE’s action may be out of control in some RF conditions with this complicated neighbor configuration, and this will have
negative effects on both cell and RNC level network performance, such as PS CCSR, HSDPA Retainability Success Rate.

Contents

Trouble Shooting

Structure of Measurement groups (1/7)
There are 2 different ways to separate Measurement groups from M2000.
Function Set
( 29 in total)
Object Type
(57 in total)
Function Subset
(130 in total)
Measurement Counter
(about 2600 in total)
Measurement Counter
(about 2600 in total)



Function Set
Algorithm PDCP
AMR PORT(FEGE,ELECT,FIBER)
CPU Radio Access Bearer management
GTPU Radio Bearer
Hard Handover Radio Link
HSDPA Radio Link Control
HSUPA Radio Resource Control
IMS Security
Inter-Radio Access Technology Handover Signalling
IUR Interface Soft Handover
LCS SRNS Relocation
MBMS Traffic Management
Measurement Report Transport layer Link(uni,ima,fra atm)
Mobility Management Transport layer Signalling
Neighbour Cell management

Function Set Name Function Subset Name
Measurement of CS RAB assignment failure per cell
Measurement of CS RAB assignment failure per RNC
Measurement of CS RAB assignment modification per cell
Measurement of CS RAB assignment modification per RNC

Measurement of CS RAB assignment setup per cell
Measurement of CS RAB assignment setup per RNC

Measurements related to Radio Access
Bearer management Measurement of CS RAB release per cell
Measurement of CS RAB release per RNC
Measurement of PS RAB assignment failure per cell
Measurement of PS RAB assignment failure per RNC
Measurement of PS RAB assignment modification per cell
Measurement of PS RAB assignment modification per RNC
Measurement of PS RAB assignment setup per cell
Measurement of PS RAB assignment setup per RNC
Measurement of PS RAB release per cell
Measurement of PS RAB release per RNC
Measurement of RAB release triggered by UTRAN per cell
Measurement of RAB release triggered by UTRAN per RNC

Object Type
AAL2_IP Node performance IP Node performance MTP3B Signalling Link Set performance
AAL2PATH performance IPOA Link performance NODEB performance
AAL2PATH PVC performance IPPATH IPLAYER performance OAM FLOW performance
between a cell and a neighbour interRAT cell IPPATH IPLAYER QOS performance per QAAL2 node
between a cell and a neighbour UMTS cell IPPATH performance PIU performance
CNOPERATOR performance IPPATH PM performance PPP Link QUEUE performance
DPU performance IPPATH_RTP performance PPP performance
ELECT Port performance IU Interface performance Radio Cell performance
FEGE Port performance IUR Interface performance RNC performance
FEGE Port QUEUE performance LOGIC_PORT performance SAALLNK PVC performance
FIBER performance LOGIC_PORT_QUEUE performance SAALSignalling Link performance
FLUX between Frames performance M3UA Destination Entity performance SCCP performance
FRA ATM Link performance M3UA Signalling Link performance SCTP IPLAYER performance
FRA IMA Link performance M3UA Signalling Link Set performance SCTP Link performance
GCU performance MLPPP performance SCU performance
GTPU performance MLPPP QUEUE performance SDH performance
IMA Group performance MPU performance SPU performance
IMA Link performance MTP3B Destination Signalling Point performance UNI Link performance
INTERWORKING performance MTP3B Signalling Link performance VC Across performance

Here is the details about measurement groups.
The file can be exported from M2000.
Measurement
Groups.xls

Contents

Event and Counter in Signaling Procedure
CS Call Setup Procedure
PS Call Setup Procedure
CS Call Release Procedure
PS Call Release Procedure
CS SHO and IRAT HO Procedure
Trouble Shooting

Legend
NodeB CAC(Iub) Check for Algorithm
Pegging Pegging in RNC
1 Counter check point
RRC: RRC CONNECTION REJECT Reject or failure Signaling
VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail(2)
VS.RRC.Rej.AAL2.Fail(3)
VS.RRC.Rej.Power.Cong(1)
VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong(1)
VS.RRC.Rej.DL.CE.Cong(1)
Counter for failure or reject
VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong(1)
RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply(4)

CS Setup(1) RNC CAC(DL power/UL
interference/Code/IUB
bandwidth and transport
resources/RNC
resource/NodeB CE)
UE NodeB SRNC CN
RRC: RRC CONNECTION REQUEST
Channel Element 1
RL SETUP REQUEST
RL SETUP RESPONSE
NodeB CAC(Iub) 2 VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail(2)
ALCAP Setup
RRC: RRC CONNECTION REJECT 3 VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong(1)

RRC: RRC CONNECTION SETUP VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong(1)
4 RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply(4)
RRC: RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE Pegging
RRC: INITIAL DIRECT TRANSFER
RANAP: INITIAL UE MESSAGE
SECURITY MODE COMMAND
SECURITY MODE COMMAND 5

VS.IU.RejSecMd.Rnl(5)
SECURITY MODE COMMAND COMPLETE
VS.IU.RejSecMd.Tnl(5)
SECURITY MODE COMMAND COMPLETE VS.IU.RejSecMd.NAS(6)
SECURITY MODE REJECT
VS.IU.RejSecMd.Opt(6)
Pegging VS.IU.RejSecMd.Unsp(6)
6

CS Setup (2/2)
UE NodeB SRNC RNC CAC(Iu)

CN
RANAP: DT
RAB ASSIGNMENT REQUEST

RNC CAC(DL power/UL
Channel Element
5
resources/RNC
resources/NodeB CE) ALCAP Setup
NodeB CAC(Iub) RL RECONFIG PRE 6

VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.TNL(5)
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.RNL
VS.FailRBSetup.CfgUnsup(7) RL RECONFIG READY
VS.RAB.FailEstCS.Relo(8)
VS.FailRBSetup.PhyChFail(7)
VS.RAB.FailEstCS.RIPFail(8)
VS.FailRBSetup.CellUpd(7)
ALCAP Setup & Sync VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Power.Cong(6)
VS.FailRBSetup.IncCfg(7)
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.ULCE.Cong(6)
VS.FailRBSetup.NoReply(7) RL RECONFIG COMMIT
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.DLCE.Cong(6)
RRC: RB SETUP
VS.RAB.FailEstCs.Code.Cong(6)
RRC: RB SETUP COMPLETE VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.DLIUBBand.Cong(6)

VS.RAB.FailEstab.CS.ULIUBBand.Cong(6)
RRC: RB SETUP FAILURE Pegging
7 RAB ASSIGNMENT RESPONSE
8 Pegging

PS Setup (1/2) RNC CAC(DL power/UL
resources/RNC
resource/NodeB CE)
UE NodeB SRNC CN
RRC: RRC CONNECTION REQUEST
Channel Element 1
RL SETUP REQUEST
VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail(2)
RL SETUP RESPONSE
NodeB CAC(Iub) 2
VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong(1)
ALCAP Setup
VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong(1)
RRC: RRC CONNECTION REJECT 3
RRC.FailConnEstab.NoReply(4)
RRC: RRC CONNECTION SETUP
RRC: RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE Pegging 4

RRC: INITIAL DIRECT TRANSFER
RANAP: INITIAL UE MESSAGE
VS.IU.RejSecMd.Rnl(5)
SECURITY MODE COMMAND VS.IU.RejSecMd.Tnl(5)

VS.IU.RejSecMd.NAS(6)
SECURITY MODE COMMAND 5
VS.IU.RejSecMd.Opt(6)
VS.IU.RejSecMd.Unsp(6)
SECURITY MODE REJECT
Pegging 6

PS Setup (2/2)
UE NodeB SRNC CN
RNC CAC(Iu)
RANAP: DT
RAB ASSIGNMENT REQUEST

RNC CAC(DL power/UL
bandwidth and transport 5
Channel Element resources/RNC ALCAP Setup
resources/NodeB CE)
NodeB CAC(Iub) RL RECONFIG PRE 6 VS.RAB.FailEstPS.RNL

VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Par(6)
RL RECONFIG READY VS.RAB.FailEstPS.Relo(8)

VS.RAB.FailEstPS.RIPFail(8)
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.Power.Cong(6)
ALCAP Setup & Sync VS.RAB.FailEstPs.ULCE.Cong(6)
VS.RAB.FailEstPs.DLCE.Cong(6)
RL RECONFIG COMMIT VS.RAB.FailEstPs.Code.Cong(6)
RRC: RB SETUP VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.DLIUBBand.Cong(6)
VS.RAB.FailEstab.PS.ULIUBBand.Cong(6)
RRC: RB SETUP COMPLETE
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.TNL(5)
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.NResAvail(6)
RRC: RB SETUP FAILURE 7 Pegging
RAB ASSIGNMENT RESPONSE

VS.FailRBSetup.CfgUnsup(7)
VS.FailRBSetup.PhyChFail(7)
8
Pegging
VS.FailRBSetup.CellUpd(7)
VS.FailRBSetup.IncCfg(7)
VS.FailRBSetup.NoReply(7)

CS Release
UE NodeB SRNC CN
RRC: RRC DIRECT TRANSF
RANAP:IU RELEASE REQUEST
RANAP: IU RELEASE COMMAND
RANAP: IU RELEASE COMPLETE
Pegging 1
RRC: RRC CONN REL
RRC: RRC CONN REL CMP VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.RLCRst(1)

VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.ULSync(1)
NBAP: RL DEL REQ VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.UuNoReply(1)
VS.RAB.Loss.CS.RF.Oth(1)
NBAP: RL DEL RSP

PS Release
UE NodeB SRNC CN
RRC: RRC DIRECT TRANSF
RANAP:IU RELEASE REQUEST
RANAP: IU RELEASE COMMAND
RANAP: IU RELEASE COMPLETE
Pegging 1
RRC: RRC CONN REL
RRC: RRC CONN REL CMP

VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.RLCRst(1)
VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.ULSync(1)
NBAP: RL DEL REQ VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.UuNoReply(1)
VS.RAB.Loss.PS.RF.Oth(1)
NBAP: RL DEL RSP

SHO (RL Addition in RNC)
UE Node B(new) RNC CAC(DL power/UL

interference/Code/RNC SRNC
resource/NodeB CE)
RLM.FailRLSetupIub.CfgUnsup(1) Decision to setup

RLM.FailRLSetupIub.Cong(1) new RL
VS.IUB.FailRLSetup.HW(1)
VS.IUB.FailRLSetup.OM(1) NBAP 1. Radio Link Setup Request NBAP
VS.Iub.RLFailSetup.NoReply(1)
Start RX description
NBAP 2. Radio Link Setup Response NBAP

Channel Element
Pegging 1
NodeB CAC(Iub) 3 ALCAP Iub Data Transport Bearer Setup
RNC CAC(Iub)
Start RX description
6.DCCH: Active Set Update Command

RRC RRC
7. DCCH : Active Set Update Complete

RRC 7. DCCH : Active Set Update Failure RRC
SHO.FailRLAddUESide.CfgUnsup(2)
Pegging
SHO.FailRLAddUESide.InvCfg(2) 2
SHO.FailRLAddUESide.NoReply(2)

SHO (Between RNCs) RNC CAC( RNC
resource/IUR
bandwidth and
transport
resoureces)
UE Node B Node B Drift RNC Serving RNC

Drift RNS Serving RNS
Decision to setup
new RL and
Channel Element
release old RL
1. Radio Link Setup Request
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.OM.Rx(1)
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.OM.Rx(1) RNSAP RNSAP
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.HW.Rx(1) 2. Radio Link Setup Request
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.HW.Rx(1) NBAP NBAP
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CongRx(1)
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CongRx(1) Start RX description
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CfgURx(1) 3. Radio Link Setup Response
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CfgURx(1) NBAP NBAP 4. Radio Link Setup
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.TransCongRx
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.TransCongRx Response
(1) RNSAP RNSAP
(1) 1bis Pegging Pegging 1
5. ALCAP Iub Data Transport Bearer Setup ALCAP Iur Bearer Setup
NodeB CAC(Iub)
RNC
Start TX description 8. DCCH: Active Set Update Command CAC(Iur)
RRC
RRC [Radio Link Addition & Deletion]
9. DCCH : Active Set Update Complete
RRC 9. DCCH : Active Set Update Failure RRC
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.OM.Tx(1bis) Pegging 2
10. Radio Link Deletion Request
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.HW.Tx(1bis) NBAP NBAP
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CongTx(1bis) Stop RX and TX
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CfgUTx(1bis) 11. Radio Link Release Response
NBAP NBAP
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.TransCongTx(1bis)
SHO.FailRLAddUESide.CfgUnsup(2)
12. ALCAP Iub Data Transport Bearer Release
SHO.FailRLAddUESide.InvCfg(2)
SHO.FailRLAddUESide.NoReply(2)

CS inter-RAT HO （UMTS->GSM）
）
UE NodeB RNC 3G MSC 2G MSC BSS
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TAlExp(1)
RL SETUP IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TgtFail(1)
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.ReloNoSup(1)
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.HigherTrafficLod(1)
Measurement Control (InterRAT )
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.NoResAvail(1)
IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.UKnowRNC(1)
Measurement Report (GSM)
Relocation Required
Relocation Preparation Prepare Handover
1 Failure
Handover Request
Handover Request ACK
Pegging
Prepare Handover RSP
Handover From UTRAN CMD Relocation Command
Handover From UTRAN Failure
2
Handover Complete
3
IU release command
IU release complete IRATHO.FailOutCS.CfgUnsupp(2)
RRC Con Release
Pegging IRATHO.FailOutCS.PhyChFail(2)
RRC Release Cmp
IRATHO.FailOutCS.Other(3)
RL Del Req
RL Del Rsp

Contents

Trouble Shooting

Counter Based Trouble Shooting – General
Approach
Report
Report ofof overall
overall KPIs
KPIs for
for
Network/RNC/Cluster
Network/RNC/Cluster
Identify
Identify abnormal
abnormal KPIs
KPIs
TOPN
TOPN cells
cells (Worst
(Worst Cells)
Cells)
Outstanding
Outstanding Sub-
Sub- Related
Related counter
counter Trace
Trace DT
DT Alarm/Onsite
Alarm/Onsite
counters
counters check
check check…etc.
check…etc.
END
END Counter Based
Trouble Shooting

Case – CSSR Abnormal Due to Power Cong.
• Issue: CSSR is decreasing
• Step#1, KPI – TopN cell analysis:
• TOPn cell analysis found the abnormal CSSR only exist for certain cells.
• Step#2, Counters:
• Checking the RRC setup and RAB setup related counters, found high vs.rrc.rej.power.cong value,
and when power congestion happens, the CSSR is low.
• Step#3, related conters:
• Check VS.MeanRTWP, VS.MaxRTWP, VS.MinRTWP, found the RTWP are abnormal for these sites.
• Step#4,
• Hardware/Feeding System/Interference check.
RRC.FailConnEstab_All Network
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
08/11/28
08/12/01
08/12/04
08/12/07
08/12/10
08/12/13
08/12/16
08/12/19
08/12/22
08/12/25
08/12/28
08/12/31
09/01/03
09/01/06
09/01/09
09/01/12
09/01/15
09/01/18
09/01/21
09/01/24
09/01/27
09/01/30
09/02/02
09/02/05
09/02/08
09/02/11
09/02/14
09/02/17
RRC.FailConnEs tab.NoReply VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail VS.RRC.Rej.AAL2.Fail VS.RRC.Rej.Power.Cong
VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong VS.RRC.Rej.DL.CE.Cong VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong VS.RRC.Rej.Other.Cong
RTWP abnormal causes

Case – Iur Issue Trouble Shooting
• Issue: Iur are not working properly. Current Iur status - Huawei<>NSN
• Step#1, Counters: 2
9%
2
• >> VS.SHO.AttRLSetupIur.Tx = VS.SHO.SuccRLSetupIur.Rx 9%
• >> VS.Iur.SHO.Att = VS.Iur.SHO.Succ ~ 0 Iur not w orking

Iur w orking fine
Iur partially w orking
13
• Conclusion: RL can setup on IUR properly, but not or 6 56% No traffic, Under Investigating
very few “active set update” procedure. 26%
• Step#2, IUR Signaling trace:

• Signaling trace shows the QAAL cannot setup due to
DRNC “switch equipment congestion”.
UE SRNC DRNC
MR(1A/1C)
RL SETUP REQ
RL SETUP RSP
QAAL2 ESTABLISH REQ
QAAL2 ESTABLISH CONFIRM
ACTIVESET UPDAATE
ACTIVESET UPDAATE COMPELTE

Contents

Trouble Shooting

Para. Optimization Target
Para. optimization
is an important step
To reduce access failures after RF optimization
To reduce drop calls
To enhance service quality
Service quality and network resources utilization

will be improved after para. optimization

Parameters to be Optimized
CCCH power allocation para. Seldom adjusted

RL maximum power para.
Cell re-selection para.
Intra-freq. handover para. An effective way to
reduce drop calls
Inter-RAT handover para.
Power control para.
Access power para.
The influence caused
Other related para. by the cell parameters
adjustment should be
analyzed carefully.

CCCH Power Allocation Para.
Parameters
Reference power to all the
PCPICH power other common channels
and all dedicated channels
PSCH power
SSCH power
Influence on the success
FACH power rate of RRC establishment
if RRC is setup on FACH
BCH power
PCH power Impact on paging success rate
PICH power
AICH power
A high CCCH power will reduce the power
allocated to dedicated traffic channels

Radio Link Maximum Power Para.
Parameters Maximum power will influence:

(1) the service coverage
12.2k AMR (2) the system capacity
CS 64k
PS 64k RL maximum power optimization
depends on many factors:
PS 128k (1) scenarios: urban, rural, ultra-
coverage…
PS 384k (2) Macro cell, micro cell, pico
cell…
… (3) strategy: e.g., PS strategy, …

Cell Re-selection Criteria
In idle mode,UE shall perform ranking of WCDMA cells that fulfill the
following cell selection criteria:
The cells shall be
S criteria: evaluated first according to
the S criteria prior to R
Squal = Qqualmeas - Qqualmin> 0 & criteria
Srxlev = Qrxlevmeas – Qrxlevmin - Pcompensation > 0
UE reselects the new cell if the

R criteria: cell reselection criteria are
fulfilled during a time interval
Rserving = Qmeas,s + Qhysts Treselection.
Rneighbor = Qmeas,n + Qoffsets,n

Intra-freq. Re-selection Para.
Optimize Treselection, Qhysts and Sintrasearch so as to have minimum ping-
pong and minimum camped onto wrong cell
The black dotted line

CPICH_Ec/Io is the serving cells.
Qhyst2
CPICH_Ec/Io Qhyst2
Qhyst2
Qhyst2
Qhyst2
The black dotted line

Sintrasearch
UE doesn’t camp is the serving cells. UE doesn’t camp
onto the best cells. onto the best cells.
Qqualmin
Qqualmin
Treselection Treselection Treselection Treselection Time

Treselection Treselection
Treselection, Qhyst2, Sintrasearch = 0 Treselection, Qhyst2, Sintrasearch ≠ 0

Inter-RAT Cell Re-selection Para.
The UE measures and makes the decision when to re-select a GSM Cell
UMTS to GSM Parameter Entity

Start/stop meas. SsearchRAT Ec/Io
Cell Ranking
Evaluation RSCP vs. RSSI
(Qoffset1sn)
GSM to UMTS Parameter Entity

Start/stop meas. Qsearch_I Always, Never or RSSI
FDD_Qmin Ec/Io
Evaluation
FDD_Qoffset RSCP vs. RSSI

Intra-frequency Soft Handover
HO Trigger Parameter (Ec/Io) Parameter (Time) Active Set
Cell Addition Reporting Range 1A Time to trigger 1A Not Full
Cell Removal Reporting Range 1B Time to trigger 1B Full,Not Full
Cell Replacement Hysteresis 1C / 1D Time to trigger 1C / 1D Full / Not Full
Suitable soft handover parameters

can effectively reduce the drop calls.

Soft Handover Event: Event 1A
Event 1A (Cell Addition)
 NA 
10 ⋅ LogMNew + CIONew ≥ W ⋅10⋅ Log ∑ Mi  + (1 −W ) ⋅10⋅ LogMBest − ( R1a − H1a / 2)
 i =1 

Soft Handover Event: Event 1B
Event 1B (Cell Removal)
 NA 
10 ⋅ LogMOld + CIOOld ≤ W ⋅10 ⋅ Log ∑ M i  + (1 − W ) ⋅10 ⋅ LogMBest − ( R1b + H1b / 2)
 i =1 

Soft Handover Event: Event 1C
Event 1C (Cell Replacement)
10 ⋅ LogM New + CIONew ≥ 10 ⋅ LogM InAS + CIOInAS + H 1c / 2

Inter-RAT UMTS to GSM Handover (1/2)
UE measures, but system decides when to transfer
UMTS to GSM Parameter Entity
Start CPM Meas. 2D Ec/Io or RSCP
Stop CPM Meas. 2F Ec/Io or RSCP
3A Ec/Io or RSCP
HO Trigger
GSM Thresh3A RSSI
reselect back
to WCDMA
3G coverage area
handover to GSM
during voice call. 2G coverage area

Inter-RAT UMTS to GSM Handover (2/2)
•Start Compress Mode measurements:
Active set CPICH Ec/No or RSCP < 2D
•Stop Compress Mode measurements:
Active set CPICH Ec/No or RSCP > 2F
•Execute handover:
GSM RSSI > GSMThreshold 3A AND CPICH Ec/No or RSCP < 3A
GSM
WCDMA
CPICH Ec/Io or RSCP GSM RSSI
gsmThresh3A
2D
Start measurements 3A
Execute handover

Power Control Classification
To adjust UE’s UL & To maintain the quality of

NodeB’s DLDCH Power communication at the level of
every one slot (1500Hz) bearer service quality
requirement, while using as
low power as possible
To determine UE’s initial UL Tx power in PRACH

and NodeB’s initial DL Tx power in DCH, and set
initial power reference values for power control.

Open Loop Power Control - Uplink
Preamble initial power
= CPICH Tx Power - CPICH RSCP + UL interference + Constant Value
Broadcasted in the
CPICH
Tx Po System Information
wer, U
L interfe
rence
level,
Con stant V
alue
RACH
Measure RSCP and determine

the initial Tx Power

Outer Loop Power Control Para.
Node-B RNC
SIR target
SIR target controlled by RNC

SIR target updated based on uplink
Main parameters:
quality
(1) SIR target adjust period SIR target set for each UE
(2) SIR target adjust step
…

Inner Loop Power Control Para.
Inner loop PC parameters:
Inform UE to select PC
Power control algorithm selection algorithm
UL inner loop PC step size

Two Modes:
DL power control mode 1 TPC command in 1 slot
Same TPC command in 3 slots
FDD DL PC step size

Load Control Parameters - CAC
CAC-related para.
DL CS cell load threshold Service-oriented

admission control
CS PS cell load threshold
UL HO cell load threshold Admission control

for HO users
DL HO cell load threshold
….

Rate Control Parameters - DCCC
DCCC Related Para. channel bandwidth will be
increased when buffered
traffic exceeds the threshold
Event 4A threshold
Event 4B threshold
channel bandwidth will be
Time to trigger 4A reduced when buffered
traffic is lower than the
threshold
Time to trigger 4B
- Without DCCC
Rate or band
Pending time 4A - With DCCC
- Traffic rate
Pending time 4B

Thank you
www.huawei.com

Overview On Huawei RAN Feature and Counters For Telkomsel: January 28, 2010

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Overview On Huawei RAN Feature and Counters For Telkomsel: January 28, 2010

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Security Level:

47pt Overview on Huawei RAN

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential

Telkomsel UMTS Double-Carrier Network Overview

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 2

DRD: Direct Retry

DRD for HSPA

Pros: The service

Cons: HSPA RAB

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 3

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 4

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 5

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 6

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 7

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 8

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 9

Telkomsel UMTS Double-Carrier Network Overview

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 10

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 11

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 12

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 13

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 14

Measurement of CS RAB assignment failure per RNC

Measurement of CS RAB assignment modification per cell

Measurement of CS RAB assignment modification per RNC

Measurement of CS RAB assignment setup per RNC

Measurement of CS RAB release per RNC

Measurement of PS RAB assignment failure per cell

Measurement of PS RAB assignment failure per RNC

Measurement of PS RAB assignment modification per cell

Measurement of PS RAB assignment modification per RNC

Measurement of PS RAB assignment setup per cell

Measurement of PS RAB assignment setup per RNC

Measurement of PS RAB release per cell

Measurement of PS RAB release per RNC

Measurement of RAB release triggered by UTRAN per cell

Measurement of RAB release triggered by UTRAN per RNC

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 15

AAL2PATH performance IPOA Link performance NODEB performance

AAL2PATH PVC performance IPPATH IPLAYER performance OAM FLOW performance

CNOPERATOR performance IPPATH PM performance PPP Link QUEUE performance

DPU performance IPPATH_RTP performance PPP performance

ELECT Port performance IU Interface performance Radio Cell performance

FEGE Port performance IUR Interface performance RNC performance

FEGE Port QUEUE performance LOGIC_PORT performance SAALLNK PVC performance

FIBER performance LOGIC_PORT_QUEUE performance SAALSignalling Link performance

GCU performance MLPPP performance SCU performance

GTPU performance MLPPP QUEUE performance SDH performance

IMA Group performance MPU performance SPU performance

INTERWORKING performance MTP3B Signalling Link performance VC Across performance

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 16

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 17

Telkomsel UMTS Double-Carrier Network Overview

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 18

NodeB CAC(Iub) Check for Algorithm

Pegging Pegging in RNC

1 Counter check point

RRC: RRC CONNECTION REJECT Reject or failure Signaling

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 19

RRC: RRC CONNECTION REQUEST

NodeB CAC(Iub) 2 VS.RRC.Rej.RL.Fail(2)

RRC: RRC CONNECTION REJECT 3 VS.RRC.Rej.UL.CE.Cong(1)