Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Epidemiology, Radiology, Pathology and Fundamentals of Surgical Treatment
1 Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Epidemiology, Radiology, Pathology and Fundamentals of Surgical Treatment
1 Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Epidemiology, Radiology, Pathology and Fundamentals of Surgical Treatment
1
Bone and Soft-tissue
Sarcomas: Epidemiology,
Radiology, Pathology and
Fundamentals of Surgical
Treatment
Barry Shmookler, Jacob Bickels, James Jelinek,
Paul Sugarbaker and Martin M. Malawer
OVERVIEW
An understanding of the basic biology and pathology of bone and soft-tissue tumors is essential for appropriate
planning of their treatment. This chapter reviews the unique biological behavior of soft-tissue and bone
sarcomas, which underlies the basis for their staging, resection, and the use of appropriate adjuvant treatment
modalities. A detailed description of the clinical, radiographic, and pathological characteristics for the most
common sarcomas is presented.
4 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
Figure 1.2 High-grade sarcomas may break through the pseudocapsule to form “skip” metastases within the same anatomical
compartment. They are occasionally found with low-grade sarcomas. Skip nodules are tumor foci not in continuity with the
main tumor mass that form outside the pseudocapsule. “Satellite"” nodules, by contrast, form within the pseudocapsule. (A)
Multiple satellite nodules (arrows) associated with a high-grade MFH. Note the normal intervening tissue. (B) “Skip”
metastases (arrows) from an osteosarcoma of the distal femur. This finding is preoperatively documented in less than 5% of
patients.
6 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
A B
A
extraosseous component of the tumor. Most high-grade bone sarcomas are bicompartmental at the time of presentation (i.e., they involve the bone of origin as well as the adjacent soft ti
Joint Involvement
and by bony involvement in later stages (Figure 1.10).
Direct tumor extension through the articular cartilage Abdominal and pelvic soft-tissue sarcomas, on the
is rare and usually occurs as the result of a pathological other hand, typically metastasize to the liver and
fracture with seeding of the joint cavity or by peri- lungs. Low-grade soft-tissue sarcomas have a low (<
capsular extension (Figure 1.7). Occasionally, 15%) rate of subsequent metastasis while high-grade
structures that pass through the joint (e.g., the cruciate lesions have a significantly higher (> 15%) rate of
ligaments) act as a conduit for tumor growth (Figures metastasis. Metastases from sarcomas to regional
1.8, 1.9). Transcapsular skip nodules are demonstrated lymph nodes are infrequent; the condition is observed
in 1% of all osteosarcomas. in only 13% of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas and
7% of bone sarcomas at initial presentation. The
prognosis associated with such an event is similar to
Metastatic Pattern that of distant metastasis.
Most patients with high-grade primary bone
Unlike carcinomas, bone and soft-tissue sarcomas sarcomas, unlike soft-tissue sarcomas, have distant
disseminate almost exclusively through the blood. micrometastases at presentation; an estimated 80% of
Hematogenous spread of extremity sarcomas is mani- patients with osteosarcomas have micrometastatic
fested by pulmonary involvement in the early stages lung disease at the time of diagnosis. For that reason,
in most
8 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
A B
Figure 1.6 (A) Axial MRI, showing metastatic bladder carcinoma to the posterior thigh. (B) Plain radiograph of the proximal
femur revealed direct invasion through the cortical bone with a pathological fracture of the lesser trochanter (arrows). (C) In
surgery, exploration of the sciatic nerve revealed direct tumor involvement with extension under the epineural sheath.
Figure 1.8 Extension of an osteosarcoma of the distal There is no single universally accepted staging system
femur to the knee joint along the cruciate ligaments (arrow for soft-tissue and bone sarcomas. Some systems are
points to tumor); the articular cartilage is intact. Knee joint
extension of a high-grade sarcoma of the distal femur is a valuable in the determination of the operative strategy,
rare event, necessitating extra-articular resection (i.e., en- whereas others may be more useful in the estimation
bloc resection of the distal femur, knee joint, and a of the prognosis. An important variable in any staging
component of the proximal tibia), as shown in this figure. system for musculoskeletal tumors, unlike a staging
Bone and Soft-tissue Sarcomas 11
originally described by Enneking et al.,2,3 for malignant
soft-tissue and bone tumors (Table 1.2), and the
American Joint Committee on Cancer developed, with
few changes, a staging system for malignant bone
tumors (Table 1.3).4
Enneking’s classical staging system is based on three
factors: histological grade (G), site (T), and the
presence or absence of metastases (M). The anatomical
site (T) may be either intracompartmental (A) or
extracompart- mental (B). This information is obtained
preoperatively on the basis of the data gained from the
various imaging modalities. A tumor is classified as
intracompartmental if it is bounded by natural barriers
to extension, such as bone, fascia, synovial tissue,
periosteum, or cartilage. An extracompartmental
tumor may be either a tumor that violated the borders
of the compartment from which it originated, or a
tumor that originated and remained in the
extracompartmental space. A tumor is assigned to
stage III (M1) if a metastasis is present at a distant site
or in a regional lymph node. It should be emphasized
that Enneking’s classification system is based on
clinical data from an era in which chemotherapy was
not given preoperatively and compartmental
resections were much more common. Therefore, there
was a clear correlation between the extent of the
tumor at presentation, its relation to the boundaries of
the compartment in which it is located, and the extent
of surgery. A close correlation was also found between
surgical stage of bone sarcoma and patient survival
(Figure 1.14). Since that time the use of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy was shown to decrease tumor size and
facilitate limb-sparing surgery, as well as reduce the
local recurrence rate. As a result, compartmental
resections became rare. Nonetheless, Enneking’s
classification is based on the biological behavior of
soft- tissue and bone sarcomas, and its underlying
concept is as relevant as it was in the early 1980s.
Enneking also described a staging system of benign
bone tumors, which remains the one that is most
commonly used (Table 1.4).2 That system is based on
the biological behavior of these tumors as suggested
Figure 1.10 Lateral plain radiograph of the lumbar spine, by their clinical manifestation and radiological
showing metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma to the body of findings. Benign bone tumors grow in a centrifugal
L3 vertebra (arrow). fashion, as do their malignant counterparts, and a rim
of reactive bone is typically formed as a response of
the host bone to the tumor. The extent of that reactive
system for carcinomas, is the grade of the tumor. The rim reflects the rate at which the tumor is growing; it is
system that is most commonly used for the staging of usually thick and well-defined around slowly growing
soft-tissue sarcomas is that of the American Joint tumors, and barely detectable around fast-growing,
Committee on Cancer (Table 1.1).1 It is based primarily aggressive tumors.
on the Memorial–Sloan Kettering staging system and Latent benign bone tumors are classified as stage 1.
does not apply to rhabdomyosarcoma. Critics of this Such tumors are usually asymptomatic and are
system point out that it is based largely on single- commonly discovered as an incidental radiographic
institution studies that were not subjected to multi- finding. Their natural history is to grow slowly during
institutional tests of validity. The Musculoskeletal
Tumor Society adopted staging systems that were
12 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
A B
D
C
Table 1.1 System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for the staging of soft-tissue sarcomas1
G1 or G
IA2 G
IB1 IIA
or GIIB
2 GIIC
1 or
IIIGIV
2 G3 or G4 G3 or G4 G
T1a
3 or
orGT41bAny
T2a G N0 N0 N0 N0 N0 N0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M0 M1
T2b N0 or N1
T1a or T1b T2a
T2b Any T
; IIB = high-grade, small, and superficial or deep; IIC = high grade, large, and superficial; III = high- grade, large, and deep; IV = any with metastasis.
mor is 5 cm in greatest dimension; T1a = T1 tumor is superficial (lesion does not involve the superficial fascia); T1b = T1 tumor is deep (lesion is deep to or invades the superficial fascia; that is, all intraperitoneal vis
14 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
akdown. CT determines the exact extent of bone destruction and MRI determines the medullary and extraosseous components of the tumor. Bone scan evaluates the cortical and intraosse
A IAIB
100
Table 1.3 System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for the staging of sarcomas of bone 4
IA G1 or G2 T1 N0 M0
IB G1 or G2 T2 N0 M0
IIA G3 or G4 T1 N0 M0
IIB G3 or G4 T2 N0 M0
III Not defined
IVA Any G Any T N1 M0
IVB Any G Any T Any N M1
aG1 = Well differentiated; G2 = moderately differentiated; G3 = poorly differentiated; G4 = undifferentiated. Ewing’s sarcoma and malignant lymphoma are graded as G4.
T = Tumor confined within the cortex; T2 = tumor extends beyond the cortex.
b 1
Table 1.4 Enneking’s system for the staging of benign bone tumors2
Typical example
A B
Figure 1.17 Plain radiographs, (A) anteroposterior and (B) lateral views of benign giant-cell tumor of the proximal tibia. The
tumor was neglected for 18 months and necessitated proximal tibia resection and reconstruction with endoprosthesis.
Malawer Chapter 01 21/02/2001 14:57 Page 17
Figure 1.18 Various excision types for soft-tissue sarcoma. Figure 1.19 Various excision types for bone sarcoma.
18 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
Fibrosarcoma
Synovial Sarcoma
Fibrosarcoma used to be considered the most common
Synovial sarcoma ranks as the fourth most common
soft-tissue sarcoma. Following the histopathologic
soft-tissue sarcoma. In spite of its name, this tumor
defi- nition of MFH as a distinct entity and the
rarely arises directly from a joint but rather arises in
subsequent assignment of “pleomorphic
proximity to it with a propensity for the distal portion
fibrosarcoma” to that category, fibrosarcoma has
of the extremities. Synovial sarcomas occur in a
become uncommon. Fibro- sarcomas usually arise
younger age group than do most other sarcomas: most
from the fascial and aponeurotic structures of the deep
patients are below the age of 40. The tumor typically
soft tissues. Superficial variants are rare. Relatively
presents as a deep-seated, well-circumscribed, multi-
small tumors present as firm, gray–white, partially to
nodular, firm mass. Contiguity with a synovium-lined
completely circumscribed masses (Figure 1.29). As
space is rare and, occasionally, lymphatic spread
these lesions enlarge, a more diffusely infiltrative
occurs. Unlike most soft-tissue sarcomas, synovial
pattern predominates.
sarcomas may be present as a painless mass for a few
The fundamental cell of this neoplasm is the years. Plain radiographs often show small
fibroblast, which is a spindle cell capable of producing
calcifications within the mass. That finding should
collagen fibers. The collagen matrix, appearing as
alert the physician to the diagnosis.
birefringent wavy fibers, can be easily recognized in
Virtually all synovial sarcomas are high-grade. The
the more differentiated fibrosarcomas (Figure 1.30). Its
poorly differentiated neoplasms usually present as ill-
presence can be confirmed with the application of defined, infiltrative lesions with a soft, somewhat
Masson trichrome stain. Well-differentiated fibrosar- gelatinous consistency. The classic histologic presenta-
coma is characterized by intersecting fascicles of tion of this tumor is a biphasic pattern. This implies
relatively uniform spindle cells showing minimal the presence of coexisting but distinct cell populations,
atypical features and sparse mitotic figures. The namely, spindle cells and epithelioid cells (Figure 1.31).
fascicles often intersect at acute angles to form the
typical herringbone pattern. Differentiating low-grade
B
C
A
Figure 1.36 Parosteal osteosarcoma. Plain radiographs of the distal femur, (A) anteroposterior and (B) lateral views, show a
dense, irregular, sclerotic lesion, attached to the posterior femoral cortex. The posterior aspect of the distal femur is a classical
location for parosteal osteosarcomas and that diagnosis should be considered for any sclerotic lesion in that location.
26 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
A C
Chondrosarcoma
Chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary
bone sarcoma. It is a heterogeneous group of tumors
Figure 1.39 Periosteal osteosarcoma of the proximal
whose basic neoplastic tissue is cartilaginous and
humerus. Plain radiograph shows a typical “scooped-out”
shows no evidence of primary osteoid formation. It is appearance of a cortical lesion (arrows). The center of the
subdivided in a variety of ways, including by lesion has a lytic appearance because of its chondroblastic
histological grade and by whether it is primary or features.
Figure 1.38 Parosteal osteosarcoma belongs to a group of Figure 1.40 A rare variant of high-grade osteosarcoma is
bone surface sarcomas. It is usually a low-grade neoplasm. the so-called small-cell type. It is composed of small round
There are parallel or intersecting osseous trabeculae that blue cells, often with only sparse osteoid matrix to reveal
may be either lamellar or woven-bone-type matrix. The the true diagnosis. Consequently extensive tumor
intervening fibrocollagenous tissue is composed of bland, sampling is necessary to differentiate it from Ewing’s
widely spaced fibroblastic cells. sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and lymphoma.
28 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
A
Figure 1.42 Secondary chondrosarcoma arising from the left proximal femur in a patient with multiple hereditary
enchondromatosis. (A) Plain radiograph shows a large, benign-appearing enchondroma arising from the right proximal femur
and a large, poorly demarcated cartilage tumor, arising from the left. (B) CT shows a marked difference between the two
lesions. The destructive neoplastic tissue has completely replaced the enchondroma on the left, and it is almost fungating
through the skin. The patient underwent modified hemipelvectomy and remains disease-free after more than 10 years of
follow-up.
30 Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery
A B
Figure 1.45 Cross-section of an intramedullary chondro- sarcoma discloses its lobular architecture and translucent, hyaline-like matrix. Note the charact
A B
C
B
Figure 1.50 GCT of the distal femur. (A) Plain radiograph
demonstrating a typical eccentric, osteolytic lesion with a
thinned cortex without periosteal elevation. There is no
evidence of matrix formation. (B) Corresponding T2-
weighted image MRI and (C) gross specimen show hemor-
rhage with an expanded but intact cortex. The major
radiological differential diagnosis is telangiectatic
osteosarc- oma, MFH, or fibrosarcoma of bone.
SUMMARY
The unique biological behavior of soft-tissue and bone
sarcomas is reviewed. In addition to serving as the
basis for the various staging systems, biological
behavior dictates the surgical planning and the choice
of adjuvant treatment modalities such as
chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Although each
soft-tissue and bone sarcoma is a distinct clinical and
pathological entity, the principles of evaluation and
management presented in this chapter apply to all.
Bone and Soft-tissue Sarcomas 35
References
1. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Soft tissues. In:
3. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for
Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al., editors. AJCC
the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin
Cancer Staging Manual, Edition 5. Philadelphia:
Orthop. 1980;153:106–20.
Lippincott-Raven; 1997:149–56.
4. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Bone. In: Fleming
2. Enneking WF. Staging of muskuloskeletal tumors. In:
ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al.., editors. AJCC Cancer
Enneking WF, editor. Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery,
Staging Manual, Edition 5. Philadelphia: Lippincott-
vol.
Raven, 1997:143–7.
1. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1983:87–8.
Malawer Chapter 01 21/02/2001 14:58 Page 36