Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pavement Design
Pavement Design
DESIGN TRAFFIC
Calcutated Note this calculation is From HD 24/26
AADT 2010 T = 365×F×Y×G×W×P×10-6msa
Where:
11,665
F = Flow of Traffic (AADF) for each traffic class at opening
9,665 Y = Design Period (Years)- 40
15,165 G = Growth Factor (from Figure 2.3)
74,190 P = Percentage of vehicles in the heaviest loaded lane (Figure 2.5)
75,190 W = Wear Factor for each traffic class (WM for Maintenance or WN for New
Case) fromTable 2.3
18,690
18,690
24,865
6,444
13,690
24,195
72,095
65,285
Percentage of CV in
Total Daily cv Wearing Factor Wearing Factor for Design Traffic (MSA)
Design period (Y) heaviest Loaded
2018 OGV2 (W) OGV1 + PSV (W) Lane (P) OGV2
FIC
t opening
ne (Figure 2.5)
aintenance or WN for New Design
Design traffic
Design Traffic T in
(MSA) OGV1 +
PSV MSA
17.64 187.33
7.20 76.42
10.81 114.81
43.00 456.71
43.58 462.86
13.17 139.92
17.16 182.23
24.65 261.83
4.90 52.04
10.19 108.25
21.95 233.13
40.95 434.88
43.95 466.79
Road Traffic Design T in % CBR E Foundation Class
msa
A 187.33 15 100 2
B 76.42 15 100 2
114.81 15 100 2
C 456.71 15 100 2
462.86 15 100 2
D 139.92 15 100 2
E 182.23 15 100 2
261.83 15 100 2
F 52.04 15 100 2
G 108.25 15 100 2
H 233.13 15 100 2
M 434.88 15 100 2
466.79 15 100 2
Maximum permissible Layer Stiffness values have also been imposed for
each
Foundation Class to minimise the risk of selecting very thin, very stiff
foundation
layers at lower subgrade CBR values. The maximum permissible Layer
Stiffnesses
to be used in design are:
Foundation Class 1 100 MPa
Foundation Class 2 350 MPa
Foundation Class 3 1000 MPa
Foundation Class 4 3500 MPa
These maximum stiffness values apply whatever method is used to
design the
foundation.
Subbase Capping Foundation Thickness For determining the Perform
150 150 300
150 150 300 E = 17.6 𝑥 〖 (𝐶𝐵𝑅) 〗 ^0.64
150 150 300 E= Performance Design
150 150 300 CBR = California Bearing Ratio (15
150 150 300
150 150 300
150 150 300
150 150 300 For determining the Foundation Th
150 150 300
150 150 300
150 150 300
150 150 300
150 150 300
etermining the Performance Design:
The table below was used to work out the different thickness of each layers in a flexible pavement.
Upper Base Lower Base Total
Course(mm) Course Thickness(mm)
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
100 130 330
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
130 130 360
s in a flexible pavement.
Since 360mm thickness was not presented in the table it was then interp
layers of flexible pavement
f pavement on road F <80 msa
in the table it was then interpolated to find different
Table for Continuously Reinforcement Cocrete Base (CRCB)
Road Design Traffic Foundation Concrete Asphalt( Concrete Design Concrete Design
(msa) class Strength (mpa) mm) Thickness (mm) for calculation
Concrete
Road Design Traffic Foundation Concrete Asphalt( Concrete Design Design for
(msa) class Strength (mpa) mm) Thickness (mm) Calculation
Formula for finding Longitudinal Reinforcement bar spacing for CRCB Formula for finding Longitu
For Road B
Reinforcement Reinforcement Transverse steel
percentage(%) Diameter(mm) Lonitudal
reinforcement Tran
bar spacing sver
0.6 16 125 se
0.6 16 144 stee
l
0.6 16 138 mus
0.6 16 108 t be
0.6 16 108 12m
m
0.6 16 134 dia
0.6 16 126 met
er
0.6 16 117
0.6 16 146 def
0.6 16 140 orm
ed
0.6 16 120 bars
0.6 16 108 at 179
0.6 16 108 600
mm
spa
cing
s
Formula for finding Longitudinal Reinforcement bar spacing for CRCP For Road C
For Road D
207
For Road E
211
For Road F
162
For Road G
195
For Road H
243
For Road M
For the Cocrete Thickness of Each
235 239
202 196
260 280
207 220
211 236 230
200
210
243 249
434 280
213
230 257
Surface Properties
12
14
14
12
12
12
12
12
16
14
12
12
12